| 27 |
|
ix86-pc-linux-gnu icc icpc ifort (Intel versions 7-9) |
| 28 |
|
powerpc-apple-darwin8.4.0 gcc g++ xlf (GNU v.4 / IBM XL v. 8.1) |
| 29 |
|
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu pgcc pgCC pgf95 (Portland Group v. 6.0) |
| 30 |
< |
sparc-sun-solaris2.8 cc CC f95 (Sun ONE Studio 10) |
| 30 |
> |
sparc-sun-solaris2.10 cc CC f95 (Sun ONE Studio 10) |
| 31 |
|
|
| 32 |
|
We've successfully compiled OOPSE with the Pathscale c, c++, and |
| 33 |
|
Fortran95 compilers on the x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu architecture, |
| 35 |
|
OOPSE to abort (rather than providing a useful error message) when |
| 36 |
|
an error is found in the meta-data file. |
| 37 |
|
|
| 38 |
< |
The GNU compilers, gcc and g++, work very well, but you will need to |
| 39 |
< |
use a Fortran *95* compler for the fortran side of OOPSE, and |
| 40 |
< |
pgf90 does not implement the required portions of the f95 |
| 41 |
< |
language. Fortran77 and Fortran90 (i.e. g77 and pgf90) are *not* |
| 42 |
< |
sufficient to compile the fortran portions of OOPSE. Gfortran |
| 43 |
< |
does not yet build our fortran code, but g95 might. If you use |
| 44 |
< |
one of these compilers, please let us know of any build or runtime |
| 45 |
< |
errors. |
| 38 |
> |
OOPSE uses features of the Fortran 95 language. The fortran |
| 39 |
> |
portions of our code will not compile if your compiler does not |
| 40 |
> |
support these particular features. Some (but not all) Fortran 90 |
| 41 |
> |
compilers do support these features. None of the Fortran 77 |
| 42 |
> |
compilers can be used to compile OOPSE. |
| 43 |
|
|
| 44 |
+ |
Compilers that are known to fail on OOPSE: g77, Gfortran, Older |
| 45 |
+ |
Portland Group compilers (pgf77, pgf90). |
| 46 |
+ |
|
| 47 |
+ |
Compilers that are known to work on OOPSE: Intel's ifort, |
| 48 |
+ |
Pathscale's pathf95, IBM's xlf95, Portland's pgf95 (version 6 or |
| 49 |
+ |
higher), Sun's f95. There may be others that work also. |
| 50 |
+ |
|
| 51 |
|
2) GNU make (also known as gmake). Regular make won't work. |
| 52 |
|
Really. We've tried. Don't bother with regular make. |
| 53 |
|
Seriously. You need GNU make. Did we mention that you |
