ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/interfacial/interfacial.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing interfacial/interfacial.tex (file contents):
Revision 3717 by gezelter, Thu Jan 27 16:29:20 2011 UTC vs.
Revision 3730 by skuang, Tue Jul 5 17:39:21 2011 UTC

# Line 22 | Line 22
22   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
23   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
24  
25 < %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional referenc note
25 > %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
26   \bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{s}{}{;}
27   \bibliographystyle{aip}
28  
# Line 44 | Line 44 | The abstract
44   \begin{doublespace}
45  
46   \begin{abstract}
47 < The abstract
47 >
48 > We have developed a Non-Isotropic Velocity Scaling algorithm for
49 > setting up and maintaining stable thermal gradients in non-equilibrium
50 > molecular dynamics simulations. This approach effectively imposes
51 > unphysical thermal flux even between particles of different
52 > identities, conserves linear momentum and kinetic energy, and
53 > minimally perturbs the velocity profile of a system when compared with
54 > previous RNEMD methods. We have used this method to simulate thermal
55 > conductance at metal / organic solvent interfaces both with and
56 > without the presence of thiol-based capping agents.  We obtained
57 > values comparable with experimental values, and observed significant
58 > conductance enhancement with the presence of capping agents. Computed
59 > power spectra indicate the acoustic impedance mismatch between metal
60 > and liquid phase is greatly reduced by the capping agents and thus
61 > leads to higher interfacial thermal transfer efficiency.
62 >
63   \end{abstract}
64  
65   \newpage
# Line 56 | Line 71 | The abstract
71   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72  
73   \section{Introduction}
74 + [BACKGROUND FOR INTERFACIAL THERMAL CONDUCTANCE PROBLEM]
75 + Interfacial thermal conductance is extensively studied both
76 + experimentally and computationally, and systems with interfaces
77 + present are generally heterogeneous. Although interfaces are commonly
78 + barriers to heat transfer, it has been
79 + reported\cite{doi:10.1021/la904855s} that under specific circustances,
80 + e.g. with certain capping agents present on the surface, interfacial
81 + conductance can be significantly enhanced. However, heat conductance
82 + of molecular and nano-scale interfaces will be affected by the
83 + chemical details of the surface and is challenging to
84 + experimentalist. The lower thermal flux through interfaces is even
85 + more difficult to measure with EMD and forward NEMD simulation
86 + methods. Therefore, developing good simulation methods will be
87 + desirable in order to investigate thermal transport across interfaces.
88  
89 < The intro.
89 > Recently, we have developed the Non-Isotropic Velocity Scaling (NIVS)
90 > algorithm for RNEMD simulations\cite{kuang:164101}. This algorithm
91 > retains the desirable features of RNEMD (conservation of linear
92 > momentum and total energy, compatibility with periodic boundary
93 > conditions) while establishing true thermal distributions in each of
94 > the two slabs. Furthermore, it allows more effective thermal exchange
95 > between particles of different identities, and thus enables extensive
96 > study of interfacial conductance.
97 >
98 > \section{Methodology}
99 > \subsection{Algorithm}
100 > [BACKGROUND FOR MD METHODS]
101 > There have been many algorithms for computing thermal conductivity
102 > using molecular dynamics simulations. However, interfacial conductance
103 > is at least an order of magnitude smaller. This would make the
104 > calculation even more difficult for those slowly-converging
105 > equilibrium methods. Imposed-flux non-equilibrium
106 > methods\cite{MullerPlathe:1997xw} have the flux set {\it a priori} and
107 > the response of temperature or momentum gradients are easier to
108 > measure than the flux, if unknown, and thus, is a preferable way to
109 > the forward NEMD methods. Although the momentum swapping approach for
110 > flux-imposing can be used for exchanging energy between particles of
111 > different identity, the kinetic energy transfer efficiency is affected
112 > by the mass difference between the particles, which limits its
113 > application on heterogeneous interfacial systems.
114 >
115 > The non-isotropic velocity scaling (NIVS)\cite{kuang:164101} approach in
116 > non-equilibrium MD simulations is able to impose relatively large
117 > kinetic energy flux without obvious perturbation to the velocity
118 > distribution of the simulated systems. Furthermore, this approach has
119 > the advantage in heterogeneous interfaces in that kinetic energy flux
120 > can be applied between regions of particles of arbitary identity, and
121 > the flux quantity is not restricted by particle mass difference.
122 >
123 > The NIVS algorithm scales the velocity vectors in two separate regions
124 > of a simulation system with respective diagonal scaling matricies. To
125 > determine these scaling factors in the matricies, a set of equations
126 > including linear momentum conservation and kinetic energy conservation
127 > constraints and target momentum/energy flux satisfaction is
128 > solved. With the scaling operation applied to the system in a set
129 > frequency, corresponding momentum/temperature gradients can be built,
130 > which can be used for computing transportation properties and other
131 > applications related to momentum/temperature gradients. The NIVS
132 > algorithm conserves momenta and energy and does not depend on an
133 > external thermostat.
134 >
135 > \subsection{Defining Interfacial Thermal Conductivity $G$}
136 > For interfaces with a relatively low interfacial conductance, the bulk
137 > regions on either side of an interface rapidly come to a state in
138 > which the two phases have relatively homogeneous (but distinct)
139 > temperatures. The interfacial thermal conductivity $G$ can therefore
140 > be approximated as:
141 > \begin{equation}
142 > G = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y \left( \langle T_\mathrm{hot}\rangle -
143 >    \langle T_\mathrm{cold}\rangle \right)}
144 > \label{lowG}
145 > \end{equation}
146 > where ${E_{total}}$ is the imposed non-physical kinetic energy
147 > transfer and ${\langle T_\mathrm{hot}\rangle}$ and ${\langle
148 >  T_\mathrm{cold}\rangle}$ are the average observed temperature of the
149 > two separated phases.
150 >
151 > When the interfacial conductance is {\it not} small, two ways can be
152 > used to define $G$.
153 >
154 > One way is to assume the temperature is discretely different on two
155 > sides of the interface, $G$ can be calculated with the thermal flux
156 > applied $J$ and the maximum temperature difference measured along the
157 > thermal gradient max($\Delta T$), which occurs at the interface, as:
158 > \begin{equation}
159 > G=\frac{J}{\Delta T}
160 > \label{discreteG}
161 > \end{equation}
162 >
163 > The other approach is to assume a continuous temperature profile along
164 > the thermal gradient axis (e.g. $z$) and define $G$ at the point where
165 > the magnitude of thermal conductivity $\lambda$ change reach its
166 > maximum, given that $\lambda$ is well-defined throughout the space:
167 > \begin{equation}
168 > G^\prime = \Big|\frac{\partial\lambda}{\partial z}\Big|
169 >         = \Big|\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(-J_z\Big/
170 >           \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)\right)\Big|
171 >         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2}\Big|
172 >         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)^2
173 > \label{derivativeG}
174 > \end{equation}
175 >
176 > With the temperature profile obtained from simulations, one is able to
177 > approximate the first and second derivatives of $T$ with finite
178 > difference method and thus calculate $G^\prime$.
179 >
180 > In what follows, both definitions are used for calculation and comparison.
181 >
182 > [IMPOSE G DEFINITION INTO OUR SYSTEMS]
183 > To facilitate the use of the above definitions in calculating $G$ and
184 > $G^\prime$, we have a metal slab with its (111) surfaces perpendicular
185 > to the $z$-axis of our simulation cells. With or withour capping
186 > agents on the surfaces, the metal slab is solvated with organic
187 > solvents, as illustrated in Figure \ref{demoPic}.
188 >
189 > \begin{figure}
190 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{demoPic}
191 > \caption{A sample showing how a metal slab has its (111) surface
192 >  covered by capping agent molecules and solvated by hexane.}
193 > \label{demoPic}
194 > \end{figure}
195 >
196 > With a simulation cell setup following the above manner, one is able
197 > to equilibrate the system and impose an unphysical thermal flux
198 > between the liquid and the metal phase with the NIVS algorithm. Under
199 > a stablized thermal gradient induced by periodically applying the
200 > unphysical flux, one is able to obtain a temperature profile and the
201 > physical thermal flux corresponding to it, which equals to the
202 > unphysical flux applied by NIVS. These data enables the evaluation of
203 > the interfacial thermal conductance of a surface. Figure \ref{gradT}
204 > is an example how those stablized thermal gradient can be used to
205 > obtain the 1st and 2nd derivatives of the temperature profile.
206 >
207 > \begin{figure}
208 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gradT}
209 > \caption{The 1st and 2nd derivatives of temperature profile can be
210 >  obtained with finite difference approximation.}
211 > \label{gradT}
212 > \end{figure}
213 >
214 > [MAY INCLUDE POWER SPECTRUM PROTOCOL]
215 >
216 > \section{Computational Details}
217 > \subsection{Simulation Protocol}
218 > In our simulations, Au is used to construct a metal slab with bare
219 > (111) surface perpendicular to the $z$-axis. Different slab thickness
220 > (layer numbers of Au) are simulated. This metal slab is first
221 > equilibrated under normal pressure (1 atm) and a desired
222 > temperature. After equilibration, butanethiol is used as the capping
223 > agent molecule to cover the bare Au (111) surfaces evenly. The sulfur
224 > atoms in the butanethiol molecules would occupy the three-fold sites
225 > of the surfaces, and the maximal butanethiol capacity on Au surface is
226 > $1/3$ of the total number of surface Au atoms[CITATION]. A series of
227 > different coverage surfaces is investigated in order to study the
228 > relation between coverage and conductance.
229 >
230 > [COVERAGE DISCRIPTION] However, since the interactions between surface
231 > Au and butanethiol is non-bonded, the capping agent molecules are
232 > allowed to migrate to an empty neighbor three-fold site during a
233 > simulation. Therefore, the initial configuration would not severely
234 > affect the sampling of a variety of configurations of the same
235 > coverage, and the final conductance measurement would be an average
236 > effect of these configurations explored in the simulations. [MAY NEED FIGURES]
237 >
238 > After the modified Au-butanethiol surface systems are equilibrated
239 > under canonical ensemble, Packmol\cite{packmol} is used to pack
240 > organic solvent molecules in the previously vacuum part of the
241 > simulation cells, which guarantees that short range repulsive
242 > interactions do not disrupt the simulations. Two solvents are
243 > investigated, one which has little vibrational overlap with the
244 > alkanethiol and plane-like shape (toluene), and one which has similar
245 > vibrational frequencies and chain-like shape ({\it n}-hexane). [MAY
246 > EXPLAIN WHY WE CHOOSE THEM]
247 >
248 > The spacing filled by solvent molecules, i.e. the gap between
249 > periodically repeated Au-butanethiol surfaces should be carefully
250 > chosen. A very long length scale for the thermal gradient axis ($z$)
251 > may cause excessively hot or cold temperatures in the middle of the
252 > solvent region and lead to undesired phenomena such as solvent boiling
253 > or freezing when a thermal flux is applied. Conversely, too few
254 > solvent molecules would change the normal behavior of the liquid
255 > phase. Therefore, our $N_{solvent}$ values were chosen to ensure that
256 > these extreme cases did not happen to our simulations. And the
257 > corresponding spacing is usually $35 \sim 60$\AA.
258 >
259 > The initial configurations generated by Packmol are further
260 > equilibrated with the $x$ and $y$ dimensions fixed, only allowing
261 > length scale change in $z$ dimension. This is to ensure that the
262 > equilibration of liquid phase does not affect the metal crystal
263 > structure in $x$ and $y$ dimensions. Further equilibration are run
264 > under NVT and then NVE ensembles.
265 >
266 > After the systems reach equilibrium, NIVS is implemented to impose a
267 > periodic unphysical thermal flux between the metal and the liquid
268 > phase. Most of our simulations are under an average temperature of
269 > $\sim$200K. Therefore, this flux usually comes from the metal to the
270 > liquid so that the liquid has a higher temperature and would not
271 > freeze due to excessively low temperature. This induced temperature
272 > gradient is stablized and the simulation cell is devided evenly into
273 > N slabs along the $z$-axis and the temperatures of each slab are
274 > recorded. When the slab width $d$ of each slab is the same, the
275 > derivatives of $T$ with respect to slab number $n$ can be directly
276 > used for $G^\prime$ calculations:
277 > \begin{equation}
278 > G^\prime = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2}\Big|
279 >         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)^2
280 >         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{1}{d^2}\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial n^2}\Big|
281 >         \Big/\left(\frac{1}{d}\frac{\partial T}{\partial n}\right)^2
282 >         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial n^2}\Big|
283 >         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial n}\right)^2
284 > \label{derivativeG2}
285 > \end{equation}
286 >
287 > \subsection{Force Field Parameters}
288 > Our simulations include various components. Therefore, force field
289 > parameter descriptions are needed for interactions both between the
290 > same type of particles and between particles of different species.
291 >
292 > The Au-Au interactions in metal lattice slab is described by the
293 > quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) formulation.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} The QSC
294 > potentials include zero-point quantum corrections and are
295 > reparametrized for accurate surface energies compared to the
296 > Sutton-Chen potentials\cite{Chen90}.
297 >
298 > Figure [REF] demonstrates how we name our pseudo-atoms of the
299 > molecules in our simulations.
300 > [FIGURE FOR MOLECULE NOMENCLATURE]
301 >
302 > For both solvent molecules, straight chain {\it n}-hexane and aromatic
303 > toluene, United-Atom (UA) and All-Atom (AA) models are used
304 > respectively. The TraPPE-UA
305 > parameters\cite{TraPPE-UA.alkanes,TraPPE-UA.alkylbenzenes} are used
306 > for our UA solvent molecules. In these models, pseudo-atoms are
307 > located at the carbon centers for alkyl groups. By eliminating
308 > explicit hydrogen atoms, these models are simple and computationally
309 > efficient, while maintains good accuracy. However, the TraPPE-UA for
310 > alkanes is known to predict a lower boiling point than experimental
311 > values. Considering that after an unphysical thermal flux is applied
312 > to a system, the temperature of ``hot'' area in the liquid phase would be
313 > significantly higher than the average, to prevent over heating and
314 > boiling of the liquid phase, the average temperature in our
315 > simulations should be much lower than the liquid boiling point. [MORE DISCUSSION]
316 > For UA-toluene model, rigid body constraints are applied, so that the
317 > benzene ring and the methyl-CRar bond are kept rigid. This would save
318 > computational time.[MORE DETAILS]
319 >
320 > Besides the TraPPE-UA models, AA models for both organic solvents are
321 > included in our studies as well. For hexane, the OPLS-AA\cite{OPLSAA}
322 > force field is used. [MORE DETAILS]
323 > For toluene, the United Force Field developed by Rapp\'{e} {\it et
324 >  al.}\cite{doi:10.1021/ja00051a040} is adopted.[MORE DETAILS]
325 >
326 > The capping agent in our simulations, the butanethiol molecules can
327 > either use UA or AA model. The TraPPE-UA force fields includes
328 > parameters for thiol molecules\cite{TraPPE-UA.thiols} and are used for
329 > UA butanethiol model in our simulations. The OPLS-AA also provides
330 > parameters for alkyl thiols. However, alkyl thiols adsorbed on Au(111)
331 > surfaces do not have the hydrogen atom bonded to sulfur. To adapt this
332 > change and derive suitable parameters for butanethiol adsorbed on
333 > Au(111) surfaces, we adopt the S parameters from [CITATION CF VLUGT]
334 > and modify parameters for its neighbor C atom for charge balance in
335 > the molecule. Note that the model choice (UA or AA) of capping agent
336 > can be different from the solvent. Regardless of model choice, the
337 > force field parameters for interactions between capping agent and
338 > solvent can be derived using Lorentz-Berthelot Mixing Rule:
339 >
340 >
341 > To describe the interactions between metal Au and non-metal capping
342 > agent and solvent particles, we refer to an adsorption study of alkyl
343 > thiols on gold surfaces by Vlugt {\it et
344 >  al.}\cite{vlugt:cpc2007154} They fitted an effective Lennard-Jones
345 > form of potential parameters for the interaction between Au and
346 > pseudo-atoms CH$_x$ and S based on a well-established and widely-used
347 > effective potential of Hautman and Klein[CITATION] for the Au(111)
348 > surface. As our simulations require the gold lattice slab to be
349 > non-rigid so that it could accommodate kinetic energy for thermal
350 > transport study purpose, the pair-wise form of potentials is
351 > preferred.
352 >
353 > Besides, the potentials developed from {\it ab initio} calculations by
354 > Leng {\it et al.}\cite{doi:10.1021/jp034405s} are adopted for the
355 > interactions between Au and aromatic C/H atoms in toluene.[MORE DETAILS]
356 >
357 > However, the Lennard-Jones parameters between Au and other types of
358 > particles in our simulations are not yet well-established. For these
359 > interactions, we attempt to derive their parameters using the Mixing
360 > Rule. To do this, the ``Metal-non-Metal'' (MnM) interaction parameters
361 > for Au is first extracted from the Au-CH$_x$ parameters by applying
362 > the Mixing Rule reversely. Table \ref{MnM} summarizes these ``MnM''
363 > parameters in our simulations.
364 >
365 > \begin{table*}
366 >  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
367 >    \begin{center}
368 >      \caption{Lennard-Jones parameters for Au-non-Metal
369 >        interactions in our simulations.}
370 >      
371 >      \begin{tabular}{ccc}
372 >        \hline\hline
373 >        Non-metal & $\sigma$/\AA & $\epsilon$/kcal/mol \\
374 >        \hline
375 >        S    & 2.40   & 8.465   \\
376 >        CH3  & 3.54   & 0.2146  \\
377 >        CH2  & 3.54   & 0.1749  \\
378 >        CT3  & 3.365  & 0.1373  \\
379 >        CT2  & 3.365  & 0.1373  \\
380 >        CTT  & 3.365  & 0.1373  \\
381 >        HC   & 2.865  & 0.09256 \\
382 >        CHar & 3.4625 & 0.1680  \\
383 >        CRar & 3.555  & 0.1604  \\
384 >        CA   & 3.173  & 0.0640  \\
385 >        HA   & 2.746  & 0.0414  \\
386 >        \hline\hline
387 >      \end{tabular}
388 >      \label{MnM}
389 >    \end{center}
390 >  \end{minipage}
391 > \end{table*}
392  
393 +
394 + \section{Results and Discussions}
395 + [MAY HAVE A BRIEF SUMMARY]
396 + \subsection{How Simulation Parameters Affects $G$}
397 + [MAY NOT PUT AT FIRST]
398 + We have varied our protocol or other parameters of the simulations in
399 + order to investigate how these factors would affect the measurement of
400 + $G$'s. It turned out that while some of these parameters would not
401 + affect the results substantially, some other changes to the
402 + simulations would have a significant impact on the measurement
403 + results.
404 +
405 + In some of our simulations, we allowed $L_x$ and $L_y$ to change
406 + during equilibrating the liquid phase. Due to the stiffness of the Au
407 + slab, $L_x$ and $L_y$ would not change noticeably after
408 + equilibration. Although $L_z$ could fluctuate $\sim$1\% after a system
409 + is fully equilibrated in the NPT ensemble, this fluctuation, as well
410 + as those comparably smaller to $L_x$ and $L_y$, would not be magnified
411 + on the calculated $G$'s, as shown in Table \ref{AuThiolHexaneUA}. This
412 + insensivity to $L_i$ fluctuations allows reliable measurement of $G$'s
413 + without the necessity of extremely cautious equilibration process.
414 +
415 + As stated in our computational details, the spacing filled with
416 + solvent molecules can be chosen within a range. This allows some
417 + change of solvent molecule numbers for the same Au-butanethiol
418 + surfaces. We did this study on our Au-butanethiol/hexane
419 + simulations. Nevertheless, the results obtained from systems of
420 + different $N_{hexane}$ did not indicate that the measurement of $G$ is
421 + susceptible to this parameter. For computational efficiency concern,
422 + smaller system size would be preferable, given that the liquid phase
423 + structure is not affected.
424 +
425 + Our NIVS algorithm allows change of unphysical thermal flux both in
426 + direction and in quantity. This feature extends our investigation of
427 + interfacial thermal conductance. However, the magnitude of this
428 + thermal flux is not arbitary if one aims to obtain a stable and
429 + reliable thermal gradient. A temperature profile would be
430 + substantially affected by noise when $|J_z|$ has a much too low
431 + magnitude; while an excessively large $|J_z|$ that overwhelms the
432 + conductance capacity of the interface would prevent a thermal gradient
433 + to reach a stablized steady state. NIVS has the advantage of allowing
434 + $J$ to vary in a wide range such that the optimal flux range for $G$
435 + measurement can generally be simulated by the algorithm. Within the
436 + optimal range, we were able to study how $G$ would change according to
437 + the thermal flux across the interface. For our simulations, we denote
438 + $J_z$ to be positive when the physical thermal flux is from the liquid
439 + to metal, and negative vice versa. The $G$'s measured under different
440 + $J_z$ is listed in Table \ref{AuThiolHexaneUA} and [REF]. These
441 + results do not suggest that $G$ is dependent on $J_z$ within this flux
442 + range. The linear response of flux to thermal gradient simplifies our
443 + investigations in that we can rely on $G$ measurement with only a
444 + couple $J_z$'s and do not need to test a large series of fluxes.
445 +
446 + %ADD MORE TO TABLE
447 + \begin{table*}
448 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
449 +    \begin{center}
450 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$ and
451 +        $G^\prime$) values for the Au/butanethiol/hexane interface
452 +        with united-atom model and different capping agent coverage
453 +        and solvent molecule numbers at different temperatures using a
454 +        range of energy fluxes.}
455 +      
456 +      \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
457 +        \hline\hline
458 +        Thiol & $\langle T\rangle$ & & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\
459 +        coverage (\%) & (K) & $N_{hexane}$ & (GW/m$^2$) &
460 +        \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\
461 +        \hline
462 +        0.0   & 200 & 200 & 0.96 & 43.3 & 42.7 \\
463 +              &     &     & 1.91 & 45.7 & 42.9 \\
464 +              &     & 166 & 0.96 & 43.1 & 53.4 \\
465 +        88.9  & 200 & 166 & 1.94 & 172  & 108  \\
466 +        100.0 & 250 & 200 & 0.96 & 81.8 & 67.0 \\
467 +              &     & 166 & 0.98 & 79.0 & 62.9 \\
468 +              &     &     & 1.44 & 76.2 & 64.8 \\
469 +              & 200 & 200 & 1.92 & 129  & 87.3 \\
470 +              &     &     & 1.93 & 131  & 77.5 \\
471 +              &     & 166 & 0.97 & 115  & 69.3 \\
472 +              &     &     & 1.94 & 125  & 87.1 \\
473 +        \hline\hline
474 +      \end{tabular}
475 +      \label{AuThiolHexaneUA}
476 +    \end{center}
477 +  \end{minipage}
478 + \end{table*}
479 +
480 + Furthermore, we also attempted to increase system average temperatures
481 + to above 200K. These simulations are first equilibrated in the NPT
482 + ensemble under normal pressure. As stated above, the TraPPE-UA model
483 + for hexane tends to predict a lower boiling point. In our simulations,
484 + hexane had diffculty to remain in liquid phase when NPT equilibration
485 + temperature is higher than 250K. Additionally, the equilibrated liquid
486 + hexane density under 250K becomes lower than experimental value. This
487 + expanded liquid phase leads to lower contact between hexane and
488 + butanethiol as well.[MAY NEED FIGURE] And this reduced contact would
489 + probably be accountable for a lower interfacial thermal conductance,
490 + as shown in Table \ref{AuThiolHexaneUA}.
491 +
492 + A similar study for TraPPE-UA toluene agrees with the above result as
493 + well. Having a higher boiling point, toluene tends to remain liquid in
494 + our simulations even equilibrated under 300K in NPT
495 + ensembles. Furthermore, the expansion of the toluene liquid phase is
496 + not as significant as that of the hexane. This prevents severe
497 + decrease of liquid-capping agent contact and the results (Table
498 + \ref{AuThiolToluene}) show only a slightly decreased interface
499 + conductance. Therefore, solvent-capping agent contact should play an
500 + important role in the thermal transport process across the interface
501 + in that higher degree of contact could yield increased conductance.
502 +
503 + [ADD SIGNS AND ERROR ESTIMATE TO TABLE]
504 + \begin{table*}
505 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
506 +    \begin{center}
507 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$ and
508 +        $G^\prime$) values for the Au/butanethiol/toluene interface at
509 +        different temperatures using a range of energy fluxes.}
510 +      
511 +      \begin{tabular}{cccc}
512 +        \hline\hline
513 +        $\langle T\rangle$ & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\
514 +        (K) & (GW/m$^2$) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\
515 +        \hline
516 +        200 & 1.86 & 180 & 135 \\
517 +            & 2.15 & 204 & 113 \\
518 +            & 3.93 & 175 & 114 \\
519 +        300 & 1.91 & 143 & 125 \\
520 +            & 4.19 & 134 & 113 \\
521 +        \hline\hline
522 +      \end{tabular}
523 +      \label{AuThiolToluene}
524 +    \end{center}
525 +  \end{minipage}
526 + \end{table*}
527 +
528 + Besides lower interfacial thermal conductance, surfaces in relatively
529 + high temperatures are susceptible to reconstructions, when
530 + butanethiols have a full coverage on the Au(111) surface. These
531 + reconstructions include surface Au atoms migrated outward to the S
532 + atom layer, and butanethiol molecules embedded into the original
533 + surface Au layer. The driving force for this behavior is the strong
534 + Au-S interactions in our simulations. And these reconstructions lead
535 + to higher ratio of Au-S attraction and thus is energetically
536 + favorable. Furthermore, this phenomenon agrees with experimental
537 + results\cite{doi:10.1021/j100035a033,doi:10.1021/la026493y}. Vlugt
538 + {\it et al.} had kept their Au(111) slab rigid so that their
539 + simulations can reach 300K without surface reconstructions. Without
540 + this practice, simulating 100\% thiol covered interfaces under higher
541 + temperatures could hardly avoid surface reconstructions. However, our
542 + measurement is based on assuming homogeneity on $x$ and $y$ dimensions
543 + so that measurement of $T$ at particular $z$ would be an effective
544 + average of the particles of the same type. Since surface
545 + reconstructions could eliminate the original $x$ and $y$ dimensional
546 + homogeneity, measurement of $G$ is more difficult to conduct under
547 + higher temperatures. Therefore, most of our measurements are
548 + undertaken at $<T>\sim$200K.
549 +
550 + However, when the surface is not completely covered by butanethiols,
551 + the simulated system is more resistent to the reconstruction
552 + above. Our Au-butanethiol/toluene system did not see this phenomena
553 + even at $<T>\sim$300K. The Au(111) surfaces have a 90\% coverage of
554 + butanethiols and have empty three-fold sites. These empty sites could
555 + help prevent surface reconstruction in that they provide other means
556 + of capping agent relaxation. It is observed that butanethiols can
557 + migrate to their neighbor empty sites during a simulation. Therefore,
558 + we were able to obtain $G$'s for these interfaces even at a relatively
559 + high temperature without being affected by surface reconstructions.
560 +
561 + \subsection{Influence of Capping Agent Coverage on $G$}
562 + To investigate the influence of butanethiol coverage on interfacial
563 + thermal conductance, a series of different coverage Au-butanethiol
564 + surfaces is prepared and solvated with various organic
565 + molecules. These systems are then equilibrated and their interfacial
566 + thermal conductivity are measured with our NIVS algorithm. Table
567 + \ref{tlnUhxnUhxnD} lists these results for direct comparison between
568 + different coverages of butanethiol.
569 +
570 + With high coverage of butanethiol on the gold surface,
571 + the interfacial thermal conductance is enhanced
572 + significantly. Interestingly, a slightly lower butanethiol coverage
573 + leads to a moderately higher conductivity. This is probably due to
574 + more solvent/capping agent contact when butanethiol molecules are
575 + not densely packed, which enhances the interactions between the two
576 + phases and lowers the thermal transfer barrier of this interface.
577 + [COMPARE TO AU/WATER IN PAPER]
578 +
579 +
580 + significant conductance enhancement compared to the gold/water
581 + interface without capping agent and agree with available experimental
582 + data. This indicates that the metal-metal potential, though not
583 + predicting an accurate bulk metal thermal conductivity, does not
584 + greatly interfere with the simulation of the thermal conductance
585 + behavior across a non-metal interface.
586 + The results show that the two definitions used for $G$ yield
587 + comparable values, though $G^\prime$ tends to be smaller.
588 +
589 +
590 + \begin{table*}
591 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
592 +    \begin{center}
593 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$ and
594 +        $G^\prime$) values for the Au/butanethiol/hexane interface
595 +        with united-atom model and different capping agent coverage
596 +        and solvent molecule numbers at different temperatures using a
597 +        range of energy fluxes.}
598 +      
599 +      \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
600 +        \hline\hline
601 +        Thiol & $\langle T\rangle$ & & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\
602 +        coverage (\%) & (K) & $N_{hexane}$ & (GW/m$^2$) &
603 +        \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\
604 +        \hline
605 +        0.0   & 200 & 200 & 0.96 & 43.3 & 42.7 \\
606 +              &     &     & 1.91 & 45.7 & 42.9 \\
607 +              &     & 166 & 0.96 & 43.1 & 53.4 \\
608 +        88.9  & 200 & 166 & 1.94 & 172  & 108  \\
609 +        100.0 & 250 & 200 & 0.96 & 81.8 & 67.0 \\
610 +              &     & 166 & 0.98 & 79.0 & 62.9 \\
611 +              &     &     & 1.44 & 76.2 & 64.8 \\
612 +              & 200 & 200 & 1.92 & 129  & 87.3 \\
613 +              &     &     & 1.93 & 131  & 77.5 \\
614 +              &     & 166 & 0.97 & 115  & 69.3 \\
615 +              &     &     & 1.94 & 125  & 87.1 \\
616 +        \hline\hline
617 +      \end{tabular}
618 +      \label{tlnUhxnUhxnD}
619 +    \end{center}
620 +  \end{minipage}
621 + \end{table*}
622 +
623 + \subsection{Influence of Chosen Molecule Model on $G$}
624 + [MAY COMBINE W MECHANISM STUDY]
625 +
626 + For the all-atom model, the liquid hexane phase was not stable under NPT
627 + conditions. Therefore, the simulation length scale parameters are
628 + adopted from previous equilibration results of the united-atom model
629 + at 200K. Table \ref{AuThiolHexaneAA} shows the results of these
630 + simulations. The conductivity values calculated with full capping
631 + agent coverage are substantially larger than observed in the
632 + united-atom model, and is even higher than predicted by
633 + experiments. It is possible that our parameters for metal-non-metal
634 + particle interactions lead to an overestimate of the interfacial
635 + thermal conductivity, although the active C-H vibrations in the
636 + all-atom model (which should not be appreciably populated at normal
637 + temperatures) could also account for this high conductivity. The major
638 + thermal transfer barrier of Au/butanethiol/hexane interface is between
639 + the liquid phase and the capping agent, so extra degrees of freedom
640 + such as the C-H vibrations could enhance heat exchange between these
641 + two phases and result in a much higher conductivity.
642 +
643 + \begin{table*}
644 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
645 +    \begin{center}
646 +      
647 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$ and
648 +        $G^\prime$) values for the Au/butanethiol/hexane interface
649 +        with all-atom model and different capping agent coverage at
650 +        200K using a range of energy fluxes.}
651 +      
652 +      \begin{tabular}{cccc}
653 +        \hline\hline
654 +        Thiol & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\
655 +        coverage (\%) & (GW/m$^2$) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\
656 +        \hline
657 +        0.0   & 0.95 & 28.5 & 27.2 \\
658 +              & 1.88 & 30.3 & 28.9 \\
659 +        100.0 & 2.87 & 551  & 294  \\
660 +              & 3.81 & 494  & 193  \\
661 +        \hline\hline
662 +      \end{tabular}
663 +      \label{AuThiolHexaneAA}
664 +    \end{center}
665 +  \end{minipage}
666 + \end{table*}
667 +
668 +
669 + \subsection{Mechanism of Interfacial Thermal Conductance Enhancement
670 +  by Capping Agent}
671 + [MAY INTRODUCE PROTOCOL IN METHODOLOGY/COMPUTATIONAL DETAIL]
672 +
673 +
674 + %subsubsection{Vibrational spectrum study on conductance mechanism}
675 + To investigate the mechanism of this interfacial thermal conductance,
676 + the vibrational spectra of various gold systems were obtained and are
677 + shown as in the upper panel of Fig. \ref{vibration}. To obtain these
678 + spectra, one first runs a simulation in the NVE ensemble and collects
679 + snapshots of configurations; these configurations are used to compute
680 + the velocity auto-correlation functions, which is used to construct a
681 + power spectrum via a Fourier transform. The gold surfaces covered by
682 + butanethiol molecules exhibit an additional peak observed at a
683 + frequency of $\sim$170cm$^{-1}$, which is attributed to the vibration
684 + of the S-Au bond. This vibration enables efficient thermal transport
685 + from surface Au atoms to the capping agents. Simultaneously, as shown
686 + in the lower panel of Fig. \ref{vibration}, the large overlap of the
687 + vibration spectra of butanethiol and hexane in the all-atom model,
688 + including the C-H vibration, also suggests high thermal exchange
689 + efficiency. The combination of these two effects produces the drastic
690 + interfacial thermal conductance enhancement in the all-atom model.
691 +
692 + \begin{figure}
693 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{vibration}
694 + \caption{Vibrational spectra obtained for gold in different
695 +  environments (upper panel) and for Au/thiol/hexane simulation in
696 +  all-atom model (lower panel).}
697 + \label{vibration}
698 + \end{figure}
699 + % MAY NEED TO CONVERT TO JPEG
700 +
701 + \section{Conclusions}
702 +
703 +
704 + [NECESSITY TO STUDY THERMAL CONDUCTANCE IN NANOCRYSTAL STRUCTURE]\cite{vlugt:cpc2007154}
705 +
706   \section{Acknowledgments}
707   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
708   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by
709   the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre
710 < Dame.  \newpage
710 > Dame. \newpage
711  
712   \bibliography{interfacial}
713  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines