ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/interfacial/interfacial.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing interfacial/interfacial.tex (file contents):
Revision 3717 by gezelter, Thu Jan 27 16:29:20 2011 UTC vs.
Revision 3729 by skuang, Wed Jun 29 18:14:23 2011 UTC

# Line 22 | Line 22
22   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
23   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
24  
25 < %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional referenc note
25 > %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
26   \bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{s}{}{;}
27   \bibliographystyle{aip}
28  
# Line 44 | Line 44 | The abstract
44   \begin{doublespace}
45  
46   \begin{abstract}
47 < The abstract
47 >
48 > We have developed a Non-Isotropic Velocity Scaling algorithm for
49 > setting up and maintaining stable thermal gradients in non-equilibrium
50 > molecular dynamics simulations. This approach effectively imposes
51 > unphysical thermal flux even between particles of different
52 > identities, conserves linear momentum and kinetic energy, and
53 > minimally perturbs the velocity profile of a system when compared with
54 > previous RNEMD methods. We have used this method to simulate thermal
55 > conductance at metal / organic solvent interfaces both with and
56 > without the presence of thiol-based capping agents.  We obtained
57 > values comparable with experimental values, and observed significant
58 > conductance enhancement with the presence of capping agents. Computed
59 > power spectra indicate the acoustic impedance mismatch between metal
60 > and liquid phase is greatly reduced by the capping agents and thus
61 > leads to higher interfacial thermal transfer efficiency.
62 >
63   \end{abstract}
64  
65   \newpage
# Line 56 | Line 71 | The abstract
71   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72  
73   \section{Introduction}
74 + [BACKGROUND FOR INTERFACIAL THERMAL CONDUCTANCE PROBLEM]
75 + Interfacial thermal conductance is extensively studied both
76 + experimentally and computationally, and systems with interfaces
77 + present are generally heterogeneous. Although interfaces are commonly
78 + barriers to heat transfer, it has been
79 + reported\cite{doi:10.1021/la904855s} that under specific circustances,
80 + e.g. with certain capping agents present on the surface, interfacial
81 + conductance can be significantly enhanced. However, heat conductance
82 + of molecular and nano-scale interfaces will be affected by the
83 + chemical details of the surface and is challenging to
84 + experimentalist. The lower thermal flux through interfaces is even
85 + more difficult to measure with EMD and forward NEMD simulation
86 + methods. Therefore, developing good simulation methods will be
87 + desirable in order to investigate thermal transport across interfaces.
88  
89 < The intro.
89 > Recently, we have developed the Non-Isotropic Velocity Scaling (NIVS)
90 > algorithm for RNEMD simulations\cite{kuang:164101}. This algorithm
91 > retains the desirable features of RNEMD (conservation of linear
92 > momentum and total energy, compatibility with periodic boundary
93 > conditions) while establishing true thermal distributions in each of
94 > the two slabs. Furthermore, it allows more effective thermal exchange
95 > between particles of different identities, and thus enables extensive
96 > study of interfacial conductance.
97 >
98 > \section{Methodology}
99 > \subsection{Algorithm}
100 > [BACKGROUND FOR MD METHODS]
101 > There have been many algorithms for computing thermal conductivity
102 > using molecular dynamics simulations. However, interfacial conductance
103 > is at least an order of magnitude smaller. This would make the
104 > calculation even more difficult for those slowly-converging
105 > equilibrium methods. Imposed-flux non-equilibrium
106 > methods\cite{MullerPlathe:1997xw} have the flux set {\it a priori} and
107 > the response of temperature or momentum gradients are easier to
108 > measure than the flux, if unknown, and thus, is a preferable way to
109 > the forward NEMD methods. Although the momentum swapping approach for
110 > flux-imposing can be used for exchanging energy between particles of
111 > different identity, the kinetic energy transfer efficiency is affected
112 > by the mass difference between the particles, which limits its
113 > application on heterogeneous interfacial systems.
114 >
115 > The non-isotropic velocity scaling (NIVS)\cite{kuang:164101} approach in
116 > non-equilibrium MD simulations is able to impose relatively large
117 > kinetic energy flux without obvious perturbation to the velocity
118 > distribution of the simulated systems. Furthermore, this approach has
119 > the advantage in heterogeneous interfaces in that kinetic energy flux
120 > can be applied between regions of particles of arbitary identity, and
121 > the flux quantity is not restricted by particle mass difference.
122 >
123 > The NIVS algorithm scales the velocity vectors in two separate regions
124 > of a simulation system with respective diagonal scaling matricies. To
125 > determine these scaling factors in the matricies, a set of equations
126 > including linear momentum conservation and kinetic energy conservation
127 > constraints and target momentum/energy flux satisfaction is
128 > solved. With the scaling operation applied to the system in a set
129 > frequency, corresponding momentum/temperature gradients can be built,
130 > which can be used for computing transportation properties and other
131 > applications related to momentum/temperature gradients. The NIVS
132 > algorithm conserves momenta and energy and does not depend on an
133 > external thermostat.
134 >
135 > \subsection{Defining Interfacial Thermal Conductivity $G$}
136 > For interfaces with a relatively low interfacial conductance, the bulk
137 > regions on either side of an interface rapidly come to a state in
138 > which the two phases have relatively homogeneous (but distinct)
139 > temperatures. The interfacial thermal conductivity $G$ can therefore
140 > be approximated as:
141 > \begin{equation}
142 > G = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y \left( \langle T_\mathrm{hot}\rangle -
143 >    \langle T_\mathrm{cold}\rangle \right)}
144 > \label{lowG}
145 > \end{equation}
146 > where ${E_{total}}$ is the imposed non-physical kinetic energy
147 > transfer and ${\langle T_\mathrm{hot}\rangle}$ and ${\langle
148 >  T_\mathrm{cold}\rangle}$ are the average observed temperature of the
149 > two separated phases.
150 >
151 > When the interfacial conductance is {\it not} small, two ways can be
152 > used to define $G$.
153 >
154 > One way is to assume the temperature is discretely different on two
155 > sides of the interface, $G$ can be calculated with the thermal flux
156 > applied $J$ and the maximum temperature difference measured along the
157 > thermal gradient max($\Delta T$), which occurs at the interface, as:
158 > \begin{equation}
159 > G=\frac{J}{\Delta T}
160 > \label{discreteG}
161 > \end{equation}
162 >
163 > The other approach is to assume a continuous temperature profile along
164 > the thermal gradient axis (e.g. $z$) and define $G$ at the point where
165 > the magnitude of thermal conductivity $\lambda$ change reach its
166 > maximum, given that $\lambda$ is well-defined throughout the space:
167 > \begin{equation}
168 > G^\prime = \Big|\frac{\partial\lambda}{\partial z}\Big|
169 >         = \Big|\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(-J_z\Big/
170 >           \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)\right)\Big|
171 >         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2}\Big|
172 >         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)^2
173 > \label{derivativeG}
174 > \end{equation}
175 >
176 > With the temperature profile obtained from simulations, one is able to
177 > approximate the first and second derivatives of $T$ with finite
178 > difference method and thus calculate $G^\prime$.
179 >
180 > In what follows, both definitions are used for calculation and comparison.
181 >
182 > [IMPOSE G DEFINITION INTO OUR SYSTEMS]
183 > To facilitate the use of the above definitions in calculating $G$ and
184 > $G^\prime$, we have a metal slab with its (111) surfaces perpendicular
185 > to the $z$-axis of our simulation cells. With or withour capping
186 > agents on the surfaces, the metal slab is solvated with organic
187 > solvents, as illustrated in Figure \ref{demoPic}.
188 >
189 > \begin{figure}
190 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{demoPic}
191 > \caption{A sample showing how a metal slab has its (111) surface
192 >  covered by capping agent molecules and solvated by hexane.}
193 > \label{demoPic}
194 > \end{figure}
195 >
196 > With a simulation cell setup following the above manner, one is able
197 > to equilibrate the system and impose an unphysical thermal flux
198 > between the liquid and the metal phase with the NIVS algorithm. Under
199 > a stablized thermal gradient induced by periodically applying the
200 > unphysical flux, one is able to obtain a temperature profile and the
201 > physical thermal flux corresponding to it, which equals to the
202 > unphysical flux applied by NIVS. These data enables the evaluation of
203 > the interfacial thermal conductance of a surface. Figure \ref{gradT}
204 > is an example how those stablized thermal gradient can be used to
205 > obtain the 1st and 2nd derivatives of the temperature profile.
206 >
207 > \begin{figure}
208 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gradT}
209 > \caption{The 1st and 2nd derivatives of temperature profile can be
210 >  obtained with finite difference approximation.}
211 > \label{gradT}
212 > \end{figure}
213 >
214 > \section{Computational Details}
215 > \subsection{System Geometry}
216 > In our simulations, Au is used to construct a metal slab with bare
217 > (111) surface perpendicular to the $z$-axis. Different slab thickness
218 > (layer numbers of Au) are simulated. This metal slab is first
219 > equilibrated under normal pressure (1 atm) and a desired
220 > temperature. After equilibration, butanethiol is used as the capping
221 > agent molecule to cover the bare Au (111) surfaces evenly. The sulfur
222 > atoms in the butanethiol molecules would occupy the three-fold sites
223 > of the surfaces, and the maximal butanethiol capacity on Au surface is
224 > $1/3$ of the total number of surface Au atoms[CITATION]. A series of
225 > different coverage surfaces is investigated in order to study the
226 > relation between coverage and conductance.
227 >
228 > [COVERAGE DISCRIPTION] However, since the interactions between surface
229 > Au and butanethiol is non-bonded, the capping agent molecules are
230 > allowed to migrate to an empty neighbor three-fold site during a
231 > simulation. Therefore, the initial configuration would not severely
232 > affect the sampling of a variety of configurations of the same
233 > coverage, and the final conductance measurement would be an average
234 > effect of these configurations explored in the simulations. [MAY NEED FIGURES]
235 >
236 > After the modified Au-butanethiol surface systems are equilibrated
237 > under canonical ensemble, Packmol\cite{packmol} is used to pack
238 > organic solvent molecules in the previously vacuum part of the
239 > simulation cells, which guarantees that short range repulsive
240 > interactions do not disrupt the simulations. Two solvents are
241 > investigated, one which has little vibrational overlap with the
242 > alkanethiol and plane-like shape (toluene), and one which has similar
243 > vibrational frequencies and chain-like shape ({\it n}-hexane). The
244 > spacing filled by solvent molecules, i.e. the gap between periodically
245 > repeated Au-butanethiol surfaces should be carefully chosen so that it
246 > would not be too short to affect the liquid phase structure, nor too
247 > long, leading to over cooling (freezing) or heating (boiling) when a
248 > thermal flux is applied. In our simulations, this spacing is usually
249 > $35 \sim 60$\AA.
250 >
251 > The initial configurations generated by Packmol are further
252 > equilibrated with the $x$ and $y$ dimensions fixed, only allowing
253 > length scale change in $z$ dimension. This is to ensure that the
254 > equilibration of liquid phase does not affect the metal crystal
255 > structure in $x$ and $y$ dimensions. Further equilibration are run
256 > under NVT and then NVE ensembles.
257 >
258 > After the systems reach equilibrium, NIVS is implemented to impose a
259 > periodic unphysical thermal flux between the metal and the liquid
260 > phase. Most of our simulations are under an average temperature of
261 > $\sim$200K. Therefore, this flux usually comes from the metal to the
262 > liquid so that the liquid has a higher temperature and would not
263 > freeze due to excessively low temperature. This induced temperature
264 > gradient is stablized and the simulation cell is devided evenly into
265 > N slabs along the $z$-axis and the temperatures of each slab are
266 > recorded. When the slab width $d$ of each slab is the same, the
267 > derivatives of $T$ with respect to slab number $n$ can be directly
268 > used for $G^\prime$ calculations:
269 > \begin{equation}
270 > G^\prime = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2}\Big|
271 >         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)^2
272 >         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{1}{d^2}\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial n^2}\Big|
273 >         \Big/\left(\frac{1}{d}\frac{\partial T}{\partial n}\right)^2
274 >         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial n^2}\Big|
275 >         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial n}\right)^2
276 > \label{derivativeG2}
277 > \end{equation}
278 >
279 > \subsection{Force Field Parameters}
280 > Our simulations include various components. Therefore, force field
281 > parameter descriptions are needed for interactions both between the
282 > same type of particles and between particles of different species.
283 >
284 > The Au-Au interactions in metal lattice slab is described by the
285 > quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) formulation.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} The QSC
286 > potentials include zero-point quantum corrections and are
287 > reparametrized for accurate surface energies compared to the
288 > Sutton-Chen potentials\cite{Chen90}.
289 >
290 > For both solvent molecules, straight chain {\it n}-hexane and aromatic
291 > toluene, United-Atom (UA) and All-Atom (AA) models are used
292 > respectively. The TraPPE-UA
293 > parameters\cite{TraPPE-UA.alkanes,TraPPE-UA.alkylbenzenes} are used
294 > for our UA solvent molecules. In these models, pseudo-atoms are
295 > located at the carbon centers for alkyl groups. By eliminating
296 > explicit hydrogen atoms, these models are simple and computationally
297 > efficient, while maintains good accuracy. However, the TraPPE-UA for
298 > alkanes is known to predict a lower boiling point than experimental
299 > values. Considering that after an unphysical thermal flux is applied
300 > to a system, the temperature of ``hot'' area in the liquid phase would be
301 > significantly higher than the average, to prevent over heating and
302 > boiling of the liquid phase, the average temperature in our
303 > simulations should be much lower than the liquid boiling point. [NEED MORE DISCUSSION]
304 > For UA-toluene model, rigid body constraints are applied, so that the
305 > benzene ring and the methyl-C(aromatic) bond are kept rigid. This
306 > would save computational time.[MORE DETAILS NEEDED]
307  
308 + Besides the TraPPE-UA models, AA models for both organic solvents are
309 + included in our studies as well. For hexane, the OPLS
310 + all-atom\cite{OPLSAA} force field is used. [MORE DETAILS]
311 + For toluene, the United Force Field developed by Rapp\'{e} {\it et
312 +  al.}\cite{doi:10.1021/ja00051a040} is adopted.[MORE DETAILS]
313 +
314 + The capping agent in our simulations, the butanethiol molecules can
315 + either use UA or AA model. The TraPPE-UA force fields includes
316 + parameters for thiol molecules\cite{TraPPE-UA.thiols} and are used in
317 + our simulations corresponding to our TraPPE-UA models for solvent.
318 + and All-Atom models [NEED CITATIONS]
319 + However, the model choice (UA or AA) of capping agent can be different
320 + from the solvent. Regardless of model choice, the force field
321 + parameters for interactions between capping agent and solvent can be
322 + derived using Lorentz-Berthelot Mixing Rule.
323 +
324 + To describe the interactions between metal Au and non-metal capping
325 + agent and solvent, we refer to Vlugt\cite{vlugt:cpc2007154} and derive
326 + other interactions which are not yet finely parametrized. [can add
327 + hautman and klein's paper here and more discussion; need to put
328 + aromatic-metal interaction approximation here]\cite{doi:10.1021/jp034405s}
329 +
330 + [TABULATED FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS NEEDED]
331 +
332 +
333 + [SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION PREVENTS SIMULATION TEMP TO GO HIGHER]
334 +
335 +
336 + \section{Results}
337 + [REARRANGEMENT NEEDED]
338 + \subsection{Toluene Solvent}
339 +
340 + The results (Table \ref{AuThiolToluene}) show a
341 + significant conductance enhancement compared to the gold/water
342 + interface without capping agent and agree with available experimental
343 + data. This indicates that the metal-metal potential, though not
344 + predicting an accurate bulk metal thermal conductivity, does not
345 + greatly interfere with the simulation of the thermal conductance
346 + behavior across a non-metal interface. The solvent model is not
347 + particularly volatile, so the simulation cell does not expand
348 + significantly under higher temperature. We did not observe a
349 + significant conductance decrease when the temperature was increased to
350 + 300K. The results show that the two definitions used for $G$ yield
351 + comparable values, though $G^\prime$ tends to be smaller.
352 +
353 + \begin{table*}
354 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
355 +    \begin{center}
356 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$ and
357 +        $G^\prime$) values for the Au/butanethiol/toluene interface at
358 +        different temperatures using a range of energy fluxes.}
359 +      
360 +      \begin{tabular}{cccc}
361 +        \hline\hline
362 +        $\langle T\rangle$ & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\
363 +        (K) & (GW/m$^2$) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\
364 +        \hline
365 +        200 & 1.86 & 180 & 135 \\
366 +            & 2.15 & 204 & 113 \\
367 +            & 3.93 & 175 & 114 \\
368 +        300 & 1.91 & 143 & 125 \\
369 +            & 4.19 & 134 & 113 \\
370 +        \hline\hline
371 +      \end{tabular}
372 +      \label{AuThiolToluene}
373 +    \end{center}
374 +  \end{minipage}
375 + \end{table*}
376 +
377 + \subsection{Hexane Solvent}
378 +
379 + Using the united-atom model, different coverages of capping agent,
380 + temperatures of simulations and numbers of solvent molecules were all
381 + investigated and Table \ref{AuThiolHexaneUA} shows the results of
382 + these computations. The number of hexane molecules in our simulations
383 + does not affect the calculations significantly. However, a very long
384 + length scale for the thermal gradient axis ($z$) may cause excessively
385 + hot or cold temperatures in the middle of the solvent region and lead
386 + to undesired phenomena such as solvent boiling or freezing, while too
387 + few solvent molecules would change the normal behavior of the liquid
388 + phase. Our $N_{hexane}$ values were chosen to ensure that these
389 + extreme cases did not happen to our simulations.
390 +
391 + Table \ref{AuThiolHexaneUA} enables direct comparison between
392 + different coverages of capping agent, when other system parameters are
393 + held constant. With high coverage of butanethiol on the gold surface,
394 + the interfacial thermal conductance is enhanced
395 + significantly. Interestingly, a slightly lower butanethiol coverage
396 + leads to a moderately higher conductivity. This is probably due to
397 + more solvent/capping agent contact when butanethiol molecules are
398 + not densely packed, which enhances the interactions between the two
399 + phases and lowers the thermal transfer barrier of this interface.
400 + % [COMPARE TO AU/WATER IN PAPER]
401 +
402 + It is also noted that the overall simulation temperature is another
403 + factor that affects the interfacial thermal conductance. One
404 + possibility of this effect may be rooted in the decrease in density of
405 + the liquid phase. We observed that when the average temperature
406 + increases from 200K to 250K, the bulk hexane density becomes lower
407 + than experimental value, as the system is equilibrated under NPT
408 + ensemble. This leads to lower contact between solvent and capping
409 + agent, and thus lower conductivity.
410 +
411 + Conductivity values are more difficult to obtain under higher
412 + temperatures. This is because the Au surface tends to undergo
413 + reconstructions in relatively high temperatures. Surface Au atoms can
414 + migrate outward to reach higher Au-S contact; and capping agent
415 + molecules can be embedded into the surface Au layer due to the same
416 + driving force. This phenomenon agrees with experimental
417 + results\cite{doi:10.1021/j100035a033,doi:10.1021/la026493y}. A surface
418 + fully covered in capping agent is more susceptible to reconstruction,
419 + possibly because fully coverage prevents other means of capping agent
420 + relaxation, such as migration to an empty neighbor three-fold site.
421 +
422 + %MAY ADD MORE DATA TO TABLE
423 + \begin{table*}
424 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
425 +    \begin{center}
426 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$ and
427 +        $G^\prime$) values for the Au/butanethiol/hexane interface
428 +        with united-atom model and different capping agent coverage
429 +        and solvent molecule numbers at different temperatures using a
430 +        range of energy fluxes.}
431 +      
432 +      \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
433 +        \hline\hline
434 +        Thiol & $\langle T\rangle$ & & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\
435 +        coverage (\%) & (K) & $N_{hexane}$ & (GW/m$^2$) &
436 +        \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\
437 +        \hline
438 +        0.0   & 200 & 200 & 0.96 & 43.3 & 42.7 \\
439 +              &     &     & 1.91 & 45.7 & 42.9 \\
440 +              &     & 166 & 0.96 & 43.1 & 53.4 \\
441 +        88.9  & 200 & 166 & 1.94 & 172  & 108  \\
442 +        100.0 & 250 & 200 & 0.96 & 81.8 & 67.0 \\
443 +              &     & 166 & 0.98 & 79.0 & 62.9 \\
444 +              &     &     & 1.44 & 76.2 & 64.8 \\
445 +              & 200 & 200 & 1.92 & 129  & 87.3 \\
446 +              &     &     & 1.93 & 131  & 77.5 \\
447 +              &     & 166 & 0.97 & 115  & 69.3 \\
448 +              &     &     & 1.94 & 125  & 87.1 \\
449 +        \hline\hline
450 +      \end{tabular}
451 +      \label{AuThiolHexaneUA}
452 +    \end{center}
453 +  \end{minipage}
454 + \end{table*}
455 +
456 + For the all-atom model, the liquid hexane phase was not stable under NPT
457 + conditions. Therefore, the simulation length scale parameters are
458 + adopted from previous equilibration results of the united-atom model
459 + at 200K. Table \ref{AuThiolHexaneAA} shows the results of these
460 + simulations. The conductivity values calculated with full capping
461 + agent coverage are substantially larger than observed in the
462 + united-atom model, and is even higher than predicted by
463 + experiments. It is possible that our parameters for metal-non-metal
464 + particle interactions lead to an overestimate of the interfacial
465 + thermal conductivity, although the active C-H vibrations in the
466 + all-atom model (which should not be appreciably populated at normal
467 + temperatures) could also account for this high conductivity. The major
468 + thermal transfer barrier of Au/butanethiol/hexane interface is between
469 + the liquid phase and the capping agent, so extra degrees of freedom
470 + such as the C-H vibrations could enhance heat exchange between these
471 + two phases and result in a much higher conductivity.
472 +
473 + \begin{table*}
474 +  \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
475 +    \begin{center}
476 +      
477 +      \caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductivity ($G$ and
478 +        $G^\prime$) values for the Au/butanethiol/hexane interface
479 +        with all-atom model and different capping agent coverage at
480 +        200K using a range of energy fluxes.}
481 +      
482 +      \begin{tabular}{cccc}
483 +        \hline\hline
484 +        Thiol & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\
485 +        coverage (\%) & (GW/m$^2$) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\
486 +        \hline
487 +        0.0   & 0.95 & 28.5 & 27.2 \\
488 +              & 1.88 & 30.3 & 28.9 \\
489 +        100.0 & 2.87 & 551  & 294  \\
490 +              & 3.81 & 494  & 193  \\
491 +        \hline\hline
492 +      \end{tabular}
493 +      \label{AuThiolHexaneAA}
494 +    \end{center}
495 +  \end{minipage}
496 + \end{table*}
497 +
498 + %subsubsection{Vibrational spectrum study on conductance mechanism}
499 + To investigate the mechanism of this interfacial thermal conductance,
500 + the vibrational spectra of various gold systems were obtained and are
501 + shown as in the upper panel of Fig. \ref{vibration}. To obtain these
502 + spectra, one first runs a simulation in the NVE ensemble and collects
503 + snapshots of configurations; these configurations are used to compute
504 + the velocity auto-correlation functions, which is used to construct a
505 + power spectrum via a Fourier transform. The gold surfaces covered by
506 + butanethiol molecules exhibit an additional peak observed at a
507 + frequency of $\sim$170cm$^{-1}$, which is attributed to the vibration
508 + of the S-Au bond. This vibration enables efficient thermal transport
509 + from surface Au atoms to the capping agents. Simultaneously, as shown
510 + in the lower panel of Fig. \ref{vibration}, the large overlap of the
511 + vibration spectra of butanethiol and hexane in the all-atom model,
512 + including the C-H vibration, also suggests high thermal exchange
513 + efficiency. The combination of these two effects produces the drastic
514 + interfacial thermal conductance enhancement in the all-atom model.
515 +
516 + \begin{figure}
517 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{vibration}
518 + \caption{Vibrational spectra obtained for gold in different
519 +  environments (upper panel) and for Au/thiol/hexane simulation in
520 +  all-atom model (lower panel).}
521 + \label{vibration}
522 + \end{figure}
523 + % 600dpi, letter size. too large?
524 +
525 +
526   \section{Acknowledgments}
527   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
528   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines