ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/interfacial/interfacial.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing interfacial/interfacial.tex (file contents):
Revision 3725 by skuang, Mon May 9 19:08:08 2011 UTC vs.
Revision 3729 by skuang, Wed Jun 29 18:14:23 2011 UTC

# Line 22 | Line 22
22   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
23   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
24  
25 < %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional referenc note
25 > %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
26   \bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{s}{}{;}
27   \bibliographystyle{aip}
28  
# Line 71 | Line 71 | leads to higher interfacial thermal transfer efficienc
71   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72  
73   \section{Introduction}
74 <
74 > [BACKGROUND FOR INTERFACIAL THERMAL CONDUCTANCE PROBLEM]
75   Interfacial thermal conductance is extensively studied both
76   experimentally and computationally, and systems with interfaces
77   present are generally heterogeneous. Although interfaces are commonly
# Line 97 | Line 97 | There have been many algorithms for computing thermal
97  
98   \section{Methodology}
99   \subsection{Algorithm}
100 + [BACKGROUND FOR MD METHODS]
101   There have been many algorithms for computing thermal conductivity
102   using molecular dynamics simulations. However, interfacial conductance
103   is at least an order of magnitude smaller. This would make the
# Line 131 | Line 132 | external thermostat.
132   algorithm conserves momenta and energy and does not depend on an
133   external thermostat.
134  
135 < (wondering how much detail of algorithm should be put here...)
135 > \subsection{Defining Interfacial Thermal Conductivity $G$}
136 > For interfaces with a relatively low interfacial conductance, the bulk
137 > regions on either side of an interface rapidly come to a state in
138 > which the two phases have relatively homogeneous (but distinct)
139 > temperatures. The interfacial thermal conductivity $G$ can therefore
140 > be approximated as:
141 > \begin{equation}
142 > G = \frac{E_{total}}{2 t L_x L_y \left( \langle T_\mathrm{hot}\rangle -
143 >    \langle T_\mathrm{cold}\rangle \right)}
144 > \label{lowG}
145 > \end{equation}
146 > where ${E_{total}}$ is the imposed non-physical kinetic energy
147 > transfer and ${\langle T_\mathrm{hot}\rangle}$ and ${\langle
148 >  T_\mathrm{cold}\rangle}$ are the average observed temperature of the
149 > two separated phases.
150  
151 < \subsection{Force Field Parameters}
152 < Our simulation systems consists of metal gold lattice slab solvated by
138 < organic solvents. In order to study the role of capping agents in
139 < interfacial thermal conductance, butanethiol is chosen to cover gold
140 < surfaces in comparison to no capping agent present.
151 > When the interfacial conductance is {\it not} small, two ways can be
152 > used to define $G$.
153  
154 < The Au-Au interactions in metal lattice slab is described by the
155 < quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) formulation.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} The QSC
156 < potentials include zero-point quantum corrections and are
157 < reparametrized for accurate surface energies compared to the
146 < Sutton-Chen potentials\cite{Chen90}.
147 <
148 < Straight chain {\it n}-hexane and aromatic toluene are respectively
149 < used as solvents. For hexane, both United-Atom\cite{TraPPE-UA.alkanes}
150 < and All-Atom\cite{OPLSAA} force fields are used for comparison; for
151 < toluene, United-Atom\cite{TraPPE-UA.alkylbenzenes} force fields are
152 < used with rigid body constraints applied. (maybe needs more details
153 < about rigid body)
154 <
155 < Buatnethiol molecules are used as capping agent for some of our
156 < simulations. United-Atom\cite{TraPPE-UA.thiols} and All-Atom models
157 < are respectively used corresponding to the force field type of
158 < solvent.
159 <
160 < To describe the interactions between metal Au and non-metal capping
161 < agent and solvent, we refer to Vlugt\cite{vlugt:cpc2007154} and derive
162 < other interactions which are not parametrized in their work. (can add
163 < hautman and klein's paper here and more discussion; need to put
164 < aromatic-metal interaction approximation here)
165 <
166 < [TABULATED FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS NEEDED]
167 <
168 < \section{Computational Details}
169 < \subsection{System Geometry}
170 < Our simulation systems consists of a lattice Au slab with the (111)
171 < surface perpendicular to the $z$-axis, and a solvent layer between the
172 < periodic Au slabs along the $z$-axis. To set up the interfacial
173 < system, the Au slab is first equilibrated without solvent under room
174 < pressure and a desired temperature. After the metal slab is
175 < equilibrated, United-Atom or All-Atom butanethiols are replicated on
176 < the Au surface, each occupying the (??) among three Au atoms, and is
177 < equilibrated under NVT ensemble. According to (CITATION), the maximal
178 < thiol capacity on Au surface is $1/3$ of the total number of surface
179 < Au atoms.
180 <
181 < \cite{packmol}
182 <
183 < \subsection{Simulation Parameters}
184 <
185 < When the interfacial conductance is {\it not} small, there are two
186 < ways to define $G$. If we assume the temperature is discretely
187 < different on two sides of the interface, $G$ can be calculated with
188 < the thermal flux applied $J$ and the temperature difference measured
189 < $\Delta T$ as:
154 > One way is to assume the temperature is discretely different on two
155 > sides of the interface, $G$ can be calculated with the thermal flux
156 > applied $J$ and the maximum temperature difference measured along the
157 > thermal gradient max($\Delta T$), which occurs at the interface, as:
158   \begin{equation}
159   G=\frac{J}{\Delta T}
160   \label{discreteG}
161   \end{equation}
162 < We can as well assume a continuous temperature profile along the
163 < thermal gradient axis $z$ and define $G$ as the change of bulk thermal
164 < conductivity $\lambda$ at a defined interfacial point:
162 >
163 > The other approach is to assume a continuous temperature profile along
164 > the thermal gradient axis (e.g. $z$) and define $G$ at the point where
165 > the magnitude of thermal conductivity $\lambda$ change reach its
166 > maximum, given that $\lambda$ is well-defined throughout the space:
167   \begin{equation}
168   G^\prime = \Big|\frac{\partial\lambda}{\partial z}\Big|
169           = \Big|\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(-J_z\Big/
170             \left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)\right)\Big|
171 <         = J_z\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2}\Big|
171 >         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2}\Big|
172           \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)^2
173   \label{derivativeG}
174   \end{equation}
175 +
176   With the temperature profile obtained from simulations, one is able to
177   approximate the first and second derivatives of $T$ with finite
178   difference method and thus calculate $G^\prime$.
179  
180   In what follows, both definitions are used for calculation and comparison.
181  
182 + [IMPOSE G DEFINITION INTO OUR SYSTEMS]
183 + To facilitate the use of the above definitions in calculating $G$ and
184 + $G^\prime$, we have a metal slab with its (111) surfaces perpendicular
185 + to the $z$-axis of our simulation cells. With or withour capping
186 + agents on the surfaces, the metal slab is solvated with organic
187 + solvents, as illustrated in Figure \ref{demoPic}.
188 +
189 + \begin{figure}
190 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{demoPic}
191 + \caption{A sample showing how a metal slab has its (111) surface
192 +  covered by capping agent molecules and solvated by hexane.}
193 + \label{demoPic}
194 + \end{figure}
195 +
196 + With a simulation cell setup following the above manner, one is able
197 + to equilibrate the system and impose an unphysical thermal flux
198 + between the liquid and the metal phase with the NIVS algorithm. Under
199 + a stablized thermal gradient induced by periodically applying the
200 + unphysical flux, one is able to obtain a temperature profile and the
201 + physical thermal flux corresponding to it, which equals to the
202 + unphysical flux applied by NIVS. These data enables the evaluation of
203 + the interfacial thermal conductance of a surface. Figure \ref{gradT}
204 + is an example how those stablized thermal gradient can be used to
205 + obtain the 1st and 2nd derivatives of the temperature profile.
206 +
207 + \begin{figure}
208 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{gradT}
209 + \caption{The 1st and 2nd derivatives of temperature profile can be
210 +  obtained with finite difference approximation.}
211 + \label{gradT}
212 + \end{figure}
213 +
214 + \section{Computational Details}
215 + \subsection{System Geometry}
216 + In our simulations, Au is used to construct a metal slab with bare
217 + (111) surface perpendicular to the $z$-axis. Different slab thickness
218 + (layer numbers of Au) are simulated. This metal slab is first
219 + equilibrated under normal pressure (1 atm) and a desired
220 + temperature. After equilibration, butanethiol is used as the capping
221 + agent molecule to cover the bare Au (111) surfaces evenly. The sulfur
222 + atoms in the butanethiol molecules would occupy the three-fold sites
223 + of the surfaces, and the maximal butanethiol capacity on Au surface is
224 + $1/3$ of the total number of surface Au atoms[CITATION]. A series of
225 + different coverage surfaces is investigated in order to study the
226 + relation between coverage and conductance.
227 +
228 + [COVERAGE DISCRIPTION] However, since the interactions between surface
229 + Au and butanethiol is non-bonded, the capping agent molecules are
230 + allowed to migrate to an empty neighbor three-fold site during a
231 + simulation. Therefore, the initial configuration would not severely
232 + affect the sampling of a variety of configurations of the same
233 + coverage, and the final conductance measurement would be an average
234 + effect of these configurations explored in the simulations. [MAY NEED FIGURES]
235 +
236 + After the modified Au-butanethiol surface systems are equilibrated
237 + under canonical ensemble, Packmol\cite{packmol} is used to pack
238 + organic solvent molecules in the previously vacuum part of the
239 + simulation cells, which guarantees that short range repulsive
240 + interactions do not disrupt the simulations. Two solvents are
241 + investigated, one which has little vibrational overlap with the
242 + alkanethiol and plane-like shape (toluene), and one which has similar
243 + vibrational frequencies and chain-like shape ({\it n}-hexane). The
244 + spacing filled by solvent molecules, i.e. the gap between periodically
245 + repeated Au-butanethiol surfaces should be carefully chosen so that it
246 + would not be too short to affect the liquid phase structure, nor too
247 + long, leading to over cooling (freezing) or heating (boiling) when a
248 + thermal flux is applied. In our simulations, this spacing is usually
249 + $35 \sim 60$\AA.
250 +
251 + The initial configurations generated by Packmol are further
252 + equilibrated with the $x$ and $y$ dimensions fixed, only allowing
253 + length scale change in $z$ dimension. This is to ensure that the
254 + equilibration of liquid phase does not affect the metal crystal
255 + structure in $x$ and $y$ dimensions. Further equilibration are run
256 + under NVT and then NVE ensembles.
257 +
258 + After the systems reach equilibrium, NIVS is implemented to impose a
259 + periodic unphysical thermal flux between the metal and the liquid
260 + phase. Most of our simulations are under an average temperature of
261 + $\sim$200K. Therefore, this flux usually comes from the metal to the
262 + liquid so that the liquid has a higher temperature and would not
263 + freeze due to excessively low temperature. This induced temperature
264 + gradient is stablized and the simulation cell is devided evenly into
265 + N slabs along the $z$-axis and the temperatures of each slab are
266 + recorded. When the slab width $d$ of each slab is the same, the
267 + derivatives of $T$ with respect to slab number $n$ can be directly
268 + used for $G^\prime$ calculations:
269 + \begin{equation}
270 + G^\prime = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial z^2}\Big|
271 +         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial z}\right)^2
272 +         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{1}{d^2}\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial n^2}\Big|
273 +         \Big/\left(\frac{1}{d}\frac{\partial T}{\partial n}\right)^2
274 +         = |J_z|\Big|\frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial n^2}\Big|
275 +         \Big/\left(\frac{\partial T}{\partial n}\right)^2
276 + \label{derivativeG2}
277 + \end{equation}
278 +
279 + \subsection{Force Field Parameters}
280 + Our simulations include various components. Therefore, force field
281 + parameter descriptions are needed for interactions both between the
282 + same type of particles and between particles of different species.
283 +
284 + The Au-Au interactions in metal lattice slab is described by the
285 + quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) formulation.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} The QSC
286 + potentials include zero-point quantum corrections and are
287 + reparametrized for accurate surface energies compared to the
288 + Sutton-Chen potentials\cite{Chen90}.
289 +
290 + For both solvent molecules, straight chain {\it n}-hexane and aromatic
291 + toluene, United-Atom (UA) and All-Atom (AA) models are used
292 + respectively. The TraPPE-UA
293 + parameters\cite{TraPPE-UA.alkanes,TraPPE-UA.alkylbenzenes} are used
294 + for our UA solvent molecules. In these models, pseudo-atoms are
295 + located at the carbon centers for alkyl groups. By eliminating
296 + explicit hydrogen atoms, these models are simple and computationally
297 + efficient, while maintains good accuracy. However, the TraPPE-UA for
298 + alkanes is known to predict a lower boiling point than experimental
299 + values. Considering that after an unphysical thermal flux is applied
300 + to a system, the temperature of ``hot'' area in the liquid phase would be
301 + significantly higher than the average, to prevent over heating and
302 + boiling of the liquid phase, the average temperature in our
303 + simulations should be much lower than the liquid boiling point. [NEED MORE DISCUSSION]
304 + For UA-toluene model, rigid body constraints are applied, so that the
305 + benzene ring and the methyl-C(aromatic) bond are kept rigid. This
306 + would save computational time.[MORE DETAILS NEEDED]
307 +
308 + Besides the TraPPE-UA models, AA models for both organic solvents are
309 + included in our studies as well. For hexane, the OPLS
310 + all-atom\cite{OPLSAA} force field is used. [MORE DETAILS]
311 + For toluene, the United Force Field developed by Rapp\'{e} {\it et
312 +  al.}\cite{doi:10.1021/ja00051a040} is adopted.[MORE DETAILS]
313 +
314 + The capping agent in our simulations, the butanethiol molecules can
315 + either use UA or AA model. The TraPPE-UA force fields includes
316 + parameters for thiol molecules\cite{TraPPE-UA.thiols} and are used in
317 + our simulations corresponding to our TraPPE-UA models for solvent.
318 + and All-Atom models [NEED CITATIONS]
319 + However, the model choice (UA or AA) of capping agent can be different
320 + from the solvent. Regardless of model choice, the force field
321 + parameters for interactions between capping agent and solvent can be
322 + derived using Lorentz-Berthelot Mixing Rule.
323 +
324 + To describe the interactions between metal Au and non-metal capping
325 + agent and solvent, we refer to Vlugt\cite{vlugt:cpc2007154} and derive
326 + other interactions which are not yet finely parametrized. [can add
327 + hautman and klein's paper here and more discussion; need to put
328 + aromatic-metal interaction approximation here]\cite{doi:10.1021/jp034405s}
329 +
330 + [TABULATED FORCE FIELD PARAMETERS NEEDED]
331 +
332 +
333 + [SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION PREVENTS SIMULATION TEMP TO GO HIGHER]
334 +
335 +
336   \section{Results}
337 + [REARRANGEMENT NEEDED]
338   \subsection{Toluene Solvent}
339  
340 < The simulations follow a protocol similar to the previous gold/water
215 < interfacial systems. The results (Table \ref{AuThiolToluene}) show a
340 > The results (Table \ref{AuThiolToluene}) show a
341   significant conductance enhancement compared to the gold/water
342   interface without capping agent and agree with available experimental
343   data. This indicates that the metal-metal potential, though not

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines