1 |
\documentclass[11pt]{article} |
2 |
\usepackage{amsmath} |
3 |
\usepackage{amssymb} |
4 |
\usepackage{setspace} |
5 |
\usepackage{endfloat} |
6 |
\usepackage{caption} |
7 |
%\usepackage{tabularx} |
8 |
\usepackage{graphicx} |
9 |
\usepackage{multirow} |
10 |
%\usepackage{booktabs} |
11 |
%\usepackage{bibentry} |
12 |
%\usepackage{mathrsfs} |
13 |
%\usepackage[ref]{overcite} |
14 |
\usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib} |
15 |
\usepackage{url} |
16 |
\pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm |
17 |
\evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight |
18 |
9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000 |
19 |
|
20 |
% double space list of tables and figures |
21 |
\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}} |
22 |
\setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt} |
23 |
\setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt} |
24 |
|
25 |
%\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note |
26 |
\bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{;} |
27 |
\bibliographystyle{achemso} |
28 |
|
29 |
\begin{document} |
30 |
|
31 |
\title{Simulating Interfacial Thermal Conductance at Metal-Solvent |
32 |
Interfaces: the Role of Chemical Capping Agents} |
33 |
|
34 |
\author{Shenyu Kuang and J. Daniel |
35 |
Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\ |
36 |
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\ |
37 |
University of Notre Dame\\ |
38 |
Notre Dame, Indiana 46556} |
39 |
|
40 |
%\date{\today} |
41 |
|
42 |
\maketitle |
43 |
|
44 |
\begin{doublespace} |
45 |
|
46 |
\newpage |
47 |
|
48 |
%\narrowtext |
49 |
|
50 |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
51 |
% BODY OF TEXT |
52 |
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% |
53 |
|
54 |
\begin{table*} |
55 |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
56 |
\begin{center} |
57 |
\caption{Non-bonded interaction parameters (including cross |
58 |
interactions with Au atoms) for both force fields used in this |
59 |
work.} |
60 |
\begin{tabular}{lllllll} |
61 |
\hline\hline |
62 |
& Site & $\sigma_{ii}$ & $\epsilon_{ii}$ & $q_i$ & |
63 |
$\sigma_{Au-i}$ & $\epsilon_{Au-i}$ \\ |
64 |
& & (\AA) & (kcal/mol) & ($e$) & (\AA) & (kcal/mol) \\ |
65 |
\hline |
66 |
United Atom (UA) |
67 |
&CH3 & 3.75 & 0.1947 & - & 3.54 & 0.2146 \\ |
68 |
&CH2 & 3.95 & 0.0914 & - & 3.54 & 0.1749 \\ |
69 |
&CHar & 3.695 & 0.1003 & - & 3.4625 & 0.1680 \\ |
70 |
&CRar & 3.88 & 0.04173 & - & 3.555 & 0.1604 \\ |
71 |
\hline |
72 |
All Atom (AA) |
73 |
&CT3 & 3.50 & 0.066 & -0.18 & 3.365 & 0.1373 \\ |
74 |
&CT2 & 3.50 & 0.066 & -0.12 & 3.365 & 0.1373 \\ |
75 |
&CTT & 3.50 & 0.066 & -0.065 & 3.365 & 0.1373 \\ |
76 |
&HC & 2.50 & 0.030 & 0.06 & 2.865 & 0.09256 \\ |
77 |
&CA & 3.55 & 0.070 & -0.115 & 3.173 & 0.0640 \\ |
78 |
&HA & 2.42 & 0.030 & 0.115 & 2.746 & 0.0414 \\ |
79 |
\hline |
80 |
Both UA and AA |
81 |
& S & 4.45 & 0.25 & - & 2.40 & 8.465 \\ |
82 |
\hline\hline |
83 |
\end{tabular} |
84 |
\label{MnM} |
85 |
\end{center} |
86 |
\end{minipage} |
87 |
\end{table*} |
88 |
|
89 |
{\bf MAY NOT NEED $J_z$ IN TABLE} |
90 |
\begin{table*} |
91 |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
92 |
\begin{center} |
93 |
|
94 |
\caption{Computed interfacial thermal conductance ($G$ and |
95 |
$G^\prime$) values for interfaces using various models for |
96 |
solvent and capping agent (or without capping agent) at |
97 |
$\langle T\rangle\sim$200K. Here ``D'' stands for deuterated |
98 |
solvent or capping agent molecules; ``Avg.'' denotes results |
99 |
that are averages of simulations under different applied |
100 |
thermal flux $(J_z)$ values. Error estimates are indicated in |
101 |
parentheses.} |
102 |
|
103 |
\begin{tabular}{llccc} |
104 |
\hline\hline |
105 |
Butanethiol model & Solvent & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\ |
106 |
(or bare surface) & model & (GW/m$^2$) & |
107 |
\multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\ |
108 |
\hline |
109 |
UA & UA hexane & Avg. & 131(9) & 87(10) \\ |
110 |
& UA hexane(D) & 1.95 & 153(5) & 136(13) \\ |
111 |
& AA hexane & Avg. & 131(6) & 122(10) \\ |
112 |
& UA toluene & 1.96 & 187(16) & 151(11) \\ |
113 |
& AA toluene & 1.89 & 200(36) & 149(53) \\ |
114 |
\hline |
115 |
AA & UA hexane & 1.94 & 116(9) & 129(8) \\ |
116 |
& AA hexane & Avg. & 442(14) & 356(31) \\ |
117 |
& AA hexane(D) & 1.93 & 222(12) & 234(54) \\ |
118 |
& UA toluene & 1.98 & 125(25) & 97(60) \\ |
119 |
& AA toluene & 3.79 & 487(56) & 290(42) \\ |
120 |
\hline |
121 |
AA(D) & UA hexane & 1.94 & 158(25) & 172(4) \\ |
122 |
& AA hexane & 1.92 & 243(29) & 191(11) \\ |
123 |
& AA toluene & 1.93 & 364(36) & 322(67) \\ |
124 |
\hline |
125 |
bare & UA hexane & Avg. & 46.5(3.2) & 49.4(4.5) \\ |
126 |
& UA hexane(D) & 0.98 & 43.9(4.6) & 43.0(2.0) \\ |
127 |
& AA hexane & 0.96 & 31.0(1.4) & 29.4(1.3) \\ |
128 |
& UA toluene & 1.99 & 70.1(1.3) & 65.8(0.5) \\ |
129 |
\hline\hline |
130 |
\end{tabular} |
131 |
\label{modelTest} |
132 |
\end{center} |
133 |
\end{minipage} |
134 |
\end{table*} |
135 |
|
136 |
\begin{table*} |
137 |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
138 |
\begin{center} |
139 |
\caption{In the hexane-solvated interfaces, the system size has |
140 |
little effect on the calculated values for interfacial |
141 |
conductance ($G$ and $G^\prime$), but the direction of heat |
142 |
flow (i.e. the sign of $J_z$) can alter the average |
143 |
temperature of the liquid phase and this can alter the |
144 |
computed conductivity.} |
145 |
|
146 |
\begin{tabular}{ccccccc} |
147 |
\hline\hline |
148 |
$\langle T\rangle$ & $N_{hexane}$ & $\rho_{hexane}$ & |
149 |
$J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\ |
150 |
(K) & & (g/cm$^3$) & (GW/m$^2$) & |
151 |
\multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\ |
152 |
\hline |
153 |
200 & 266 & 0.672 & -0.96 & 102(3) & 80.0(0.8) \\ |
154 |
& 200 & 0.688 & 0.96 & 125(16) & 90.2(15) \\ |
155 |
& & & 1.91 & 139(10) & 101(10) \\ |
156 |
& & & 2.83 & 141(6) & 89.9(9.8) \\ |
157 |
& 166 & 0.681 & 0.97 & 141(30) & 78(22) \\ |
158 |
& & & 1.92 & 138(4) & 98.9(9.5) \\ |
159 |
\hline |
160 |
250 & 200 & 0.560 & 0.96 & 75(10) & 61.8(7.3) \\ |
161 |
& & & -0.95 & 49.4(0.3) & 45.7(2.1) \\ |
162 |
& 166 & 0.569 & 0.97 & 80.3(0.6) & 67(11) \\ |
163 |
& & & 1.44 & 76.2(5.0) & 64.8(3.8) \\ |
164 |
& & & -0.95 & 56.4(2.5) & 54.4(1.1) \\ |
165 |
& & & -1.85 & 47.8(1.1) & 53.5(1.5) \\ |
166 |
\hline\hline |
167 |
\end{tabular} |
168 |
\label{AuThiolHexaneUA} |
169 |
\end{center} |
170 |
\end{minipage} |
171 |
\end{table*} |
172 |
|
173 |
\begin{table*} |
174 |
\begin{minipage}{\linewidth} |
175 |
\begin{center} |
176 |
\caption{When toluene is the solvent, the interfacial thermal |
177 |
conductivity is less sensitive to temperature, but again, the |
178 |
direction of the heat flow can alter the solvent temperature |
179 |
and can change the computed conductance values.} |
180 |
|
181 |
\begin{tabular}{ccccc} |
182 |
\hline\hline |
183 |
$\langle T\rangle$ & $\rho_{toluene}$ & $J_z$ & $G$ & $G^\prime$ \\ |
184 |
(K) & (g/cm$^3$) & (GW/m$^2$) & \multicolumn{2}{c}{(MW/m$^2$/K)} \\ |
185 |
\hline |
186 |
200 & 0.933 & 2.15 & 204(12) & 113(12) \\ |
187 |
& & -1.86 & 180(3) & 135(21) \\ |
188 |
& & -3.93 & 176(5) & 113(12) \\ |
189 |
\hline |
190 |
300 & 0.855 & -1.91 & 143(5) & 125(2) \\ |
191 |
& & -4.19 & 135(9) & 113(12) \\ |
192 |
\hline\hline |
193 |
\end{tabular} |
194 |
\label{AuThiolToluene} |
195 |
\end{center} |
196 |
\end{minipage} |
197 |
\end{table*} |
198 |
|
199 |
\end{doublespace} |
200 |
\end{document} |