ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/5cb/5CB.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/5cb/5CB.tex (file contents):
Revision 4039 by gezelter, Thu Feb 20 21:23:54 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4040 by gezelter, Fri Feb 21 15:36:40 2014 UTC

# Line 144 | Line 144 | particular, lyotropic liquid crystals (those exhibitin
144   partial bilayers ($S_{\tilde A}$) as well as interdigitated bilayers
145   ($S_{A_{d}}$), and often have a terminal cyano or nitro group.  In
146   particular, lyotropic liquid crystals (those exhibiting liquid crystal
147 < phase transition as a function of water concentration), often have
147 > phase transitions as a function of water concentration), often have
148   polar head groups or zwitterionic charge separated groups that result
149 < in strong dipolar interactions,\cite{Collings:1997rz} and terminal cyano
150 < groups (like the one in 5CB) can induce permanent longitudinal
151 < dipoles.\cite{Levelut:1981eu}
149 > in strong dipolar interactions,\cite{Collings:1997rz} and terminal
150 > cyano groups (like the one in 5CB) can induce permanent longitudinal
151 > dipoles.\cite{Levelut:1981eu} Modeling of the phase behavior of these
152 > molecules either requires additional dipolar
153 > interactions,\cite{Bose:2012eu} or a unified-atom approach utilizing
154 > point charges on the sites that contribute to the dipole
155 > moment.\cite{Zhang:2011hh}
156  
157   Macroscopic electric fields applied using electrodes on opposing sides
158   of a sample of 5CB have demonstrated the phase change of the molecule
# Line 183 | Line 187 | scanning electrochemical microscopy experiments.
187   scanning electrochemical microscopy experiments.
188  
189   \section{Computational Details}
190 < The force field used for 5CB was taken from Guo {\it et
191 <  al.}\cite{Zhang:2011hh} However, for most of the simulations, each
192 < of the phenyl rings was treated as a rigid body to allow for larger
193 < time steps and very long simulation times.  The geometries of the
194 < rigid bodies were taken from equilibrium bond distances and angles.
195 < Although the phenyl rings were held rigid, bonds, bends, torsions and
196 < inversion centers that involved atoms in these substructures (but with
197 < connectivity to the rest of the molecule) were still included in the
198 < potential and force calculations.
190 > The force field used for 5CB was a united-atom model that was
191 > parameterized by Guo {\it et al.}\cite{Zhang:2011hh} However, for most
192 > of the simulations, each of the phenyl rings was treated as a rigid
193 > body to allow for larger time steps and very long simulation times.
194 > The geometries of the rigid bodies were taken from equilibrium bond
195 > distances and angles.  Although the phenyl rings were held rigid,
196 > bonds, bends, torsions and inversion centers that involved atoms in
197 > these substructures (but with connectivity to the rest of the
198 > molecule) were still included in the potential and force calculations.
199  
200   Periodic simulations cells containing 270 molecules in random
201   orientations were constructed and were locked at experimental
# Line 200 | Line 204 | with an energy corresponding to the average energy fro
204   were equilibrated for 1~ns at a temperature of 300K.  Simulations with
205   applied fields were carried out in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble
206   with an energy corresponding to the average energy from the canonical
207 < (NVT) equilibration runs.  Typical applied-field runs were more than
208 < 60ns in length.
207 > (NVT) equilibration runs.  Typical applied-field equilibration runs
208 > were more than 60ns in length.
209  
210   Static electric fields with magnitudes similar to what would be
211   available in an experimental setup were applied to the different
# Line 240 | Line 244 | parameter. This was determined using the tensor
244   primary quantity of interest is the nematic (orientational) order
245   parameter. This was determined using the tensor
246   \begin{equation}
247 < Q_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{1}{2N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \left(3 \hat{e}_{i
248 <    \alpha} \hat{e}_{i \beta} - \delta_{\alpha \beta} \right)
247 > Q_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{1}{2N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \left(3 \hat{u}_{i
248 >    \alpha} \hat{u}_{i \beta} - \delta_{\alpha \beta} \right)
249   \end{equation}
250 < where $\alpha, \beta = x, y, z$, and $\hat{e}_i$ is the molecular
250 > where $\alpha, \beta = x, y, z$, and $\hat{u}_i$ is the molecular
251   end-to-end unit vector for molecule $i$. The nematic order parameter
252   $S$ is the largest eigenvalue of $Q_{\alpha \beta}$, and the
253   corresponding eigenvector defines the director axis for the phase.
254   $S$ takes on values close to 1 in highly ordered (smectic A) phases,
255 < but falls to zero for isotropic fluids.  Note that the nitrogen and
256 < the terminal chain atom were used to define the vectors for each
257 < molecule, so the typical order parameters are lower than if one
258 < defined a vector using only the rigid core of the molecule.  In
259 < nematic phases, typical values for $S$ are close to 0.5.
255 > but falls to much smaller values ($\sim 0-0.2$) for isotropic fluids.
256 > Note that the nitrogen and the terminal chain atom were used to define
257 > the vectors for each molecule, so the typical order parameters are
258 > lower than if one defined a vector using only the rigid core of the
259 > molecule.  In nematic phases, typical values for $S$ are close to 0.5.
260  
261   The field-induced phase transition can be clearly seen over the course
262   of a 60 ns equilibration runs in figure \ref{fig:orderParameter}.  All
# Line 535 | Line 539 | homogeneous distrobution of the local field near the n
539   and subsiquent phase change does cause a narrowing of freuency
540   distrobution. With narrowing, it would indicate an increased
541   homogeneous distrobution of the local field near the nitrile.
538
542  
543 < The angle-dependent pair distribution function,
544 < \begin{equation}
545 < g(r, \cos \omega) = \frac{1}{\rho N} \left< \sum_{i}
546 < \sum_{j} \delta \left(r - r_{ij}\right) \delta\left(\cos \omega_{ij} - \cos \omega\right) \right>
547 < \end{equation}
548 < provides information about the spatial and angular correlations in the
549 < system. The angle $\omega$ is defined by vectors along the CN axis of
550 < each nitrile bond (see figure \ref{fig:definition}).
543 > The angle-dependent pair distribution functions,
544 > \begin{align}
545 > g(r, \cos \omega) = &  \frac{1}{\rho N} \left< \sum_{i}
546 > \sum_{j} \delta \left(r - r_{ij}\right) \delta\left(\cos \omega_{ij} -
547 >  \cos \omega\right) \right> \\ \nonumber \\
548 > g(r, \cos \theta) = & \frac{1}{\rho N} \left< \sum_{i}
549 > \sum_{j} \delta \left(r - r_{ij}\right) \delta\left(\cos \theta_{i} -
550 >  \cos \theta \right) \right>
551 > \end{align}
552 > provide information about the joint spatial and angular correlations
553 > in the system. The angles $\omega$ and $\theta$ are defined by vectors
554 > along the CN axis of each nitrile bond (see figure
555 > \ref{fig:definition}).
556  
557   \begin{figure}
558    \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{definition}
559 <  \caption{Definitions of the angles between two nitrile bonds.  All
552 <    pairs of CN bonds in the simulation have three angles ($\theta_i$,
553 <    $\theta_j$ and $\omega$).  $\cos\omega$ values range from -1
554 <    (anti-aligned) to +1 for aligned nitrile bonds.}
559 >  \caption{Definitions of the angles between two nitrile bonds.}
560    \label{fig:definition}
561   \end{figure}
562  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines