ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/5cb/5CB.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/5cb/5CB.tex (file contents):
Revision 4048 by gezelter, Tue Feb 25 18:52:18 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4051 by gezelter, Tue Feb 25 21:07:04 2014 UTC

# Line 493 | Line 493 | field-induced nematic ordering of the 4-cyano-4'-penty
493  
494   Our simulations show that the united-atom model can reproduce the
495   field-induced nematic ordering of the 4-cyano-4'-pentylbiphenyl.
496 < Because we are simulating what is in effect a small electrode
497 < separation (5nm), a voltage drop as low as 1.2 V was sufficient to
498 < induce the phase change.  This potential is significantly lower than
499 < the 500V that is known to cause dielectric breakdown in 5CB.\cite{XXX}
496 > Because we are simulating a very small electrode separation (5nm), a
497 > voltage drop as low as 1.2 V was sufficient to induce the phase
498 > change. This potential is significantly lower than the 500V that is
499 > known to cause dielectric breakdown in 5CB.\cite{XXX}
500  
501   Both the classical correlation function and the isolated cluster
502   approaches to estimating the field-induced changes to the IR spectrum
503   show an increase in the population of nitrile stretches that appear at
504   a shift of $\sim 40 \mathrm{cm}^{-1}$ to the red of the unperturbed
505 < vibrational line. The cause of this shift does not appear to be
506 < related to the alignment of those nitrile bonds with the field, but
507 < rather to the change in local environment that is brought about by the
508 < isotropic-nematic transition.
509 <
510 < The angle-dependent pair distribution functions,
505 > vibrational line.  To understand the origin of this shift, a more
506 > complete picture of the spatial ordering around the nitrile bonds is
507 > required.  The angle-dependent pair distribution functions,
508   \begin{align}
509   g(r, \cos \omega) = &  \frac{1}{\rho N} \left< \sum_{i}
510   \sum_{j} \delta \left(r - r_{ij}\right) \delta\left(\cos \omega_{ij} -
# Line 528 | Line 525 | In figure \ref{fig:gofromega}, one of the structural e
525   \end{figure}
526  
527   In figure \ref{fig:gofromega}, one of the structural effects of the
528 < field-induced phase transition is clear.  The nematic ordering
529 < transfers population from the perpendicular or unaligned region in the
530 < center of the plot to the nitrile-alinged peak near $\cos\omega =
531 < 1$. Most other features are undisturbed.  The major change visible is
532 < the increased population of aligned nitrile bonds in the first
533 < solvation shells.
537 <
528 > field-induced phase transition is clear. The nematic ordering
529 > transfers population from the perpendicular or unaligned region ($\cos
530 > \omega \approx 0$) to the nitrile-alinged peak near $\cos\omega = 1$,
531 > leaving most other features are undisturbed.  This change is visible
532 > in the simulations as an increased population of aligned nitrile bonds
533 > in the first solvation shell.  
534   \begin{figure}
535    \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Figure4}
536    \caption{Contours of the angle-dependent pair distribution functions
# Line 544 | Line 540 | solvation shells.
540      the bulk density.}
541    \label{fig:gofromega}
542   \end{figure}
547
543   Although it is possible that the coupling between closely-spaced
544   nitrile pairs is responsible for some of the red-shift, that is not
545 < the complete picture.  The other two dimensional pair distribution
546 < function, $g(r,\cos\theta)$, shows that nematic ordering also
547 < transfers population that is directly in line with the nitrile bond
548 < (see figure \ref{fig:gofrtheta}) to the sides of the molecule, thereby
549 < freeing steric blockage that directly blocks the nitrile vibratio
545 > the only structural change that is taking place.  The other two
546 > dimensional pair distribution function, $g(r,\cos\theta)$, shows that
547 > nematic ordering also transfers population that is directly in line
548 > with the nitrile bond (see figure \ref{fig:gofrtheta}) to the sides of
549 > the molecule, thereby freeing steric blockage that is more directly
550 > influencing the nitrile vibration.
551   \begin{figure}
552 <
557 <  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Figure5}
552 >  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Figure6}
553    \caption{Contours of the angle-dependent pair distribution function,
554      $g(r,\cos \theta)$, for finding any atom at a distance and angular
555 <    deviation from the nitrile bond centroid.  The right side of each
556 <    plot corresponds to local density directly the direction of
557 <    nitrile bond.  Increased density at $\cos\theta = 1$ corresponds
558 <    to steric hindrance of the nitrile bond.}
559 <  \label{fig:gofromega}
555 >    deviation from the centrile of a nitrile bond.  The top of each
556 >    contour plot corresponds to local density along the direction of
557 >    the nitrogen in the CN bond, while the bottom is in the direction
558 >    of the carbon atom.  $g(z)$ data taken by following the
559 >    \ce{C -> N} vector for each nitrile bond (bottom panel) shows
560 >    that the field-induced phase transition reduces the population
561 >    atoms that are directly in line with the vibrational motion.}
562 >  \label{fig:gofrtheta}
563   \end{figure}
564  
567 .At the same time, the system exhibits an increase in aligned
568 and anti-a
565  
566  
567  
568 + The cause of this shift does not appear to be
569 + related to the alignment of those nitrile bonds with the field, but
570 + rather to the change in local environment that is brought about by the
571 + isotropic-nematic transition.
572  
573  
574
575
574   While this makes the application of nitrile Stark effects in
575   simulations without water harder, these data show
576   that it is not a deal breaker. The classically calculated nitrile

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines