ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3816 by jmichalk, Sat Dec 15 00:06:33 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 3817 by jmichalk, Sat Dec 15 22:41:13 2012 UTC

# Line 4 | Line 4
4   \usepackage{setspace}
5   \usepackage{endfloat}
6   \usepackage{caption}
7 +
8   %\usepackage{tabularx}
9   \usepackage{graphicx}
10   \usepackage{multirow}
# Line 60 | Line 61 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
61   %authors
62  
63   % make the title
64 < \maketitle/
64 > \maketitle
65  
66   \begin{doublespace}
67  
# Line 207 | Line 208 | mechanical predictions (-2.46 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO
208   mechanical predictions (-2.46 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCOCalc}.
209   %CO Table
210   \begin{table}[H]
211 < \caption{Positions, $\sigma$, $\epsilon$ and charges for CO geometry and self-interactions\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are in kcal/mol, and charges are in $e$.}
211 > \caption{Positions, $\sigma$, $\epsilon$ and charges for CO geometry
212 > and self-interactions\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are
213 > in kcal/mol, and charges are in $e$.}
214   \centering
215   \begin{tabular}{| c | c | ccc |}
216   \hline
# Line 326 | Line 329 | All simulations were run using the open source molecul
329   & Calc. & Exp. \\
330   \hline
331   \textbf{Pt-CO} & -1.9 & -1.4~\cite{Kelemen:1979}-- -1.9~\cite{Yeo} \\
332 < \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.44~\cite{TPD_Gold} \\
332 > \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40~\cite{TPD_Gold} \\
333   \hline
334   \end{tabular}
335   \end{table}
# Line 339 | Line 342 | While an ideal metallic surface is unlikely to experie
342   % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
343   \section{Results}
344   \subsection{Diffusion}
345 < While an ideal metallic surface is unlikely to experience much surface diffusion, high-index surfaces have large numbers of low-coordinated atoms which have a much easier time overcoming the energetic barriers limiting diffusion, leading to easier surface reconstructions. Surface movement was divided between the parallel ($\parallel$) and perpendicular ($\perp$) directions relative to the step edge. We were then able to calculate diffusion constants as a function of CO coverage. As can be seen in Table 4, the presence and amount of CO directly affects the diffusion constants of surface platinum atoms. The presence of two 50\% coverage systems is to show how the diffusion process is affected by time. The majority of the systems were run for approximately 50 ns while the half monolayer system has been running continuously. The lowered diffusion constant at longer run times will be examined in-depth in the discussion section.
345 > An ideal metal surface displaying a low-energy facet, a (111) face for
346 > instance, is unlikely to experience much surface diffusion because of
347 > the large energy barrier associated with atoms 'lifting' from the top
348 > layer to then be able to explore the surface. Rougher surfaces, those
349 > that already contain numerous adatoms, step edges, and kinks, should
350 > have concomitantly higher surface diffusion rates. Tao et al. showed
351 > that the platinum 557 surface undergoes two separate reconstructions
352 > upon CO adsorption. \cite{Tao:2010} The first reconstruction involves a
353 > doubling of the step edge height which is accomplished by a doubling
354 > of the plateau length. The second reconstruction led to the formation of
355 > triangular motifs stretching across the lengthened plateaus.
356  
357 + As shown in Figure 2, over a period of approximately 100 ns, the surface
358 + has reconstructed from a 557 surface by doubling the step height and
359 + step length. Focusing on only the platinum, or gold, atoms that were
360 + deemed mobile on the surface, an analysis of the surface diffusion was
361 + performed. A particle was considered mobile once it had traveled more
362 + than 2~\AA between snapshots. This immediately eliminates all of the
363 + bulk metal and greatly limits the number of surface atoms examined.
364 + Since diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by overcoming energy
365 + barriers, the diffusion parallel to the step edge axis was determined
366 + separately from the diffusion perpendicular to the step edge. The results
367 + at various coverages on both platinum and gold are shown in Table 4.
368 +
369 + %While an ideal metallic surface is unlikely to experience much surface diffusion, high-index surfaces have large numbers of low-coordinated atoms which have a much easier time overcoming the energetic barriers limiting diffusion, leading to easier surface reconstructions. Surface movement was divided between the parallel ($\parallel$) and perpendicular ($\perp$) directions relative to the step edge. We were then able to calculate diffusion constants as a function of CO coverage. As can be seen in Table 4, the presence and amount of CO directly affects the diffusion constants of surface platinum atoms. The presence of two 50\% coverage systems is to show how the diffusion process is affected by time. The majority of the systems were run for approximately 50 ns while the half monolayer system has been running continuously. The lowered diffusion constant at longer run times will be examined in-depth in the discussion section.
370 +
371   \begin{figure}[H]
372   \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{DiffusionComparison_error.png}
373   \caption{Diffusion parallel to the step edge will always be higher than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy barrier associated with going from approximately 7 nearest neighbors to 5, as compared to the 3 of an adatom. Additionally, the observed maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to movement of the platinum atoms around and more importantly across the surface. }
# Line 379 | Line 406 | As shown in the results section, the diffusion paralle
406   %Evolution of surface
407   \begin{figure}[H]
408   \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
409 < \caption{Four snapshots at various times a) 258 ps b) 19 ns c) 31.2 ns d) 86.1 ns. Slight disruption of the surface occurs fairly quickly. However, the doubling of the layers seems to be very dependent on the initial linking of two separate step edges. The focal point in b, appears to be a growth spot for the rest of the double layer.}
409 > \caption{Four snapshots of the $\frac{1}{2}$ monolayer system at various times a) 258 ps b) 19 ns c) 31.2 ns and d) 86.1 ns. Slight disruption of the surface occurs fairly quickly. However, the doubling of the layers seems to be very dependent on the initial linking of two separate step edges. The focal point in b, appears to be a growth spot for the rest of the double layer.}
410   \end{figure}
411  
412  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines