ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3817 by jmichalk, Sat Dec 15 22:41:13 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 3820 by gezelter, Mon Dec 17 18:45:57 2012 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2   \usepackage{amsmath}
3   \usepackage{amssymb}
4 + \usepackage{times}
5 + \usepackage{mathptm}
6   \usepackage{setspace}
7 < \usepackage{endfloat}
7 > \usepackage{float}
8   \usepackage{caption}
9  
10   %\usepackage{tabularx}
# Line 11 | Line 13
13   %\usepackage{booktabs}
14   %\usepackage{bibentry}
15   %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
14 %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
16   \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
17   \usepackage{url}
18   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
# Line 19 | Line 20
20   9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
21  
22   % double space list of tables and figures
23 < \AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
23 > %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
24   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
25   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
26  
27 < %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
27 < \bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{;}
27 > \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
28   \bibliographystyle{achemso}
29  
30   \begin{document}
# Line 49 | Line 49
49   %%
50  
51   %Title
52 < \title{Investigation of the Pt and Au 557 Surface Reconstructions
53 <  under a CO Atmosphere}
52 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
53 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
54 >
55   \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
56   Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
57   Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
58   University of Notre Dame\\
59   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
60 +
61   %Date
62 < \date{Dec 15,  2012}
62 > \date{Dec 15, 2012}
63 >
64   %authors
65  
66   % make the title
# Line 117 | Line 120 | weaker interaction with CO, is less likely to undergo
120  
121  
122  
120
121
122
123   \section{Simulation Methods}
124   The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface problem is the
125   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
# Line 248 | Line 248 | The Au-C and Au-O interaction parameters were also fit
248   %where did you actually get the functionals for citation?
249   %scf calculations, so initial relaxation was of the four layers, but two layers weren't kept fixed, I don't think
250   %same cutoff for slab and slab + CO ? seems low, although feibelmen had values around there...
251 < The Au-C and Au-O interaction parameters were also fit to a Lennard-Jones
252 < and Morse potential respectively, to reproduce Au-CO binding energies.
253 < These energies were obtained from quantum calculations carried out using
254 < the PBE GGA exchange-correlation functionals\cite{Perdew_GGA} for gold, carbon, and oxygen
255 < constructed by Rappe, Rabe, Kaxiras, and Joannopoulos. \cite{RRKJ_PP}.
256 < All calculations were run using the {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package. \cite{QE-2009}  
257 < First, a four layer slab of gold comprised of 32 atoms displaying a (111) surface was
258 < converged using a 4X4X4 grid of Monkhorst-Pack \emph{k}-points.\cite{Monkhorst:1976}
259 < The kinetic energy of the wavefunctions were truncated at 20 Ry while the
260 < cutoff for the charge density and potential was set at 80 Ry. This relaxed
261 < gold slab was then used in numerous single point calculations  with CO at various heights
262 < to create a potential energy surface for the Au-CO interaction.
251 > The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were fit using Lennard-Jones and
252 > Morse potentials, respectively, to reproduce Au-CO binding energies.
253  
254 + The fits were refined against gas-surface calculations using DFT with
255 + a periodic supercell plane-wave basis approach, as implemented in the
256 + {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores are
257 + described with the projector augmented-wave (PAW)
258 + method,\cite{PhysRevB.50.17953,PhysRevB.59.1758} with plane waves
259 + included to an energy cutoff of 20 Ry. Electronic energies are
260 + computed with the PBE implementation of the generalized gradient
261 + approximation (GGA) for gold, carbon, and oxygen that was constructed
262 + by Rappe, Rabe, Kaxiras, and Joannopoulos.\cite{Perdew_GGA,RRKJ_PP}
263 + Ionic relaxations were performed until the energy difference between
264 + subsequent steps was less than 0.0001 eV.  In testing the CO-Au
265 + interaction, Au(111) supercells were constructed of four layers of 4
266 + Au x 2 Au surface planes and separated from vertical images by six
267 + layers of vacuum space. The surface atoms were all allowed to relax.
268 + Supercell calculations were performed nonspin-polarized, and energies
269 + were converged to within 0.03 meV per Au atom with a 4 x 4 x 4
270 + Monkhorst-Pack\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} {\bf k}-point
271 + sampling of the first Brillouin zone.  The relaxed gold slab was then
272 + used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various heights
273 + (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the empirical
274 + force field.
275 +
276   %Hint at future work
277   The fit parameter sets employed in this work are shown in Table 2 and their
278   reproduction of the binding energies are displayed in Table 3. Currently,

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines