ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3826 by gezelter, Wed Dec 19 21:37:51 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 3875 by gezelter, Wed Mar 13 19:18:03 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 >
24 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
25 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
26   \usepackage{url}
27   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
28   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
# Line 22 | Line 32
32   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
33   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
34   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
35 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
36  
37 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
38 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
37 > %\citestyle{nature}
38 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
39  
40 < \begin{document}
40 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
41 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
42  
43 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
44 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
45 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
46 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
47 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
48 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
49 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
50  
51 + \keywords{}
52 +
53 + \begin{document}
54 +
55 +
56   %%
57   %Introduction
58   %       Experimental observations
# Line 47 | Line 71
71   %Summary
72   %%
73  
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
74  
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Dec 15, 2012}
62
63 %authors
64
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
67
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
75   \begin{abstract}
76 + We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
77 + various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
78 + explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
79 + and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
80 + as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
81 + this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
82 + strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
83 + role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
84 + small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
85 + was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
86 + is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
87 + systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
88  
89   \end{abstract}
90  
# Line 100 | Line 117 | This work an effort to understand the mechanism and ti
117   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
118   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
119  
120 < This work an effort to understand the mechanism and timescale for
120 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for
121   surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
122 < of the process is of particular interest, we utilize classical force
122 > of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
123   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
124 < computational efficiency necessary to observe the process of interest.
124 > computational efficiency necessary to simulate the process of interest.
125 > Since restructuring typically occurs as a result of specific interactions of the
126 > catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
127 > to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
128 > to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
129 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
130 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
131 > and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
132 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxation to the
133 > 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
134 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
135 > allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
136 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern being greatly
137 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
138 > disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
139 > surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
140 > low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
141  
142 < Since restructuring occurs as a result of specific interactions of the
110 < catalyst with adsorbates, two metal systems exposed to carbon monoxide
111 < were examined in this work. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
112 < to reconstruct under certain conditions. The Au(557) surface, because
113 < of a weaker interaction with CO, is less likely to undergo this kind
114 < of reconstruction.  MORE HERE ON PT AND AU PREVIOUS WORK.
142 >
143  
144   %Platinum molecular dynamics
145   %gold molecular dynamics
146  
147   \section{Simulation Methods}
148 < The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface problem is the
148 > The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface is the
149   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
150   model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
151   adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
# Line 133 | Line 161 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions, while modeling the CO us
161   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
162   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
163   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
164 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions, while modeling the CO using a rigid
164 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was modeled using a rigid
165   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
166   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
167   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 146 | Line 174 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al
174   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
175   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
176   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
177 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al.} is among the
177 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is among the
178   fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
179   all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
180   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
# Line 164 | Line 192 | $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is an pairwise term that is meant
192   V_i =  F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]  + \sum_{j \neq i} \phi_{ij}(r_{ij})
193   \end{equation*}
194   where $F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]$ is an energy embedding functional, and
195 < $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is an pairwise term that is meant to represent the
196 < overlap of the two positively charged cores.  
195 > $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is a pairwise term that is meant to represent the
196 > repulsive overlap of the two positively charged cores.  
197  
198   % The {\it modified} embedded atom method (MEAM) adds angular terms to
199   % the electron density functions and an angular screening factor to the
# Line 176 | Line 204 | The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen
204   % metals,\cite{Lee:2001qf} and also interfaces.\cite{Beurden:2002ys})
205   % MEAM presents significant additional computational costs, however.
206  
207 < The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen potentials
207 > The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) potentials
208   have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
209   simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
210   properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
211   melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
212   fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
213   propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
214 < dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} All of these potentials have their
215 < strengths and weaknesses.  One of the strengths common to all of the
216 < methods is the relatively large library of metals for which these
217 < potentials have been
218 < parameterized.\cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
214 > dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
215 > is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
216 > from the original parameterization, where the interactions
217 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
218 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
219 > which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
220 > interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
221 > the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
222 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
223 > treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
224 > theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
225 > \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
226  
227 +
228 +
229 +
230   \subsection{Carbon Monoxide model}
231 < Since previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
232 < the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide, the model
233 < chosen for this molecule exhibits this property in an efficient
234 < manner. We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
235 < the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Straub
236 < and Karplus model is a rigid linear three site model which places a
237 < massless (M) site at the center of mass along the CO bond.  The
238 < geometry and interaction parameters are reproduced in Table 1. The
239 < effective dipole moment, calculated from the assigned charges, is
240 < still small (0.35 D) while the linear quadrupole (-2.40 D~\AA) is
241 < close to the experimental (-2.63 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO} and quantum
231 > Previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
232 > the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}  
233 > We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
234 > the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin because it reproduces
235 > the quadrupole moment well.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
236 > Karplus model treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
237 > site at the molecular center of mass. The geometry and interaction
238 > parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:CO}. The effective
239 > dipole moment, calculated from the assigned charges, is still
240 > small (0.35 D) while the linear quadrupole (-2.40 D~\AA) is close
241 > to the experimental (-2.63 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO} and quantum
242   mechanical predictions (-2.46 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCOCalc}.
243   %CO Table
244   \begin{table}[H]
245    \caption{Positions, Lennard-Jones parameters ($\sigma$ and
246      $\epsilon$), and charges for the CO-CO
247 <    interactions borrowed from Ref. \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are
247 >    interactions in Ref.\bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA, energies are
248      in kcal/mol, and charges are in atomic units.}
249   \centering
250   \begin{tabular}{| c | c | ccc |}
251   \hline
252   &  {\it z} & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & q\\
253   \hline
254 < \textbf{C} & -0.6457 &  0.0262  & 3.83   &   -0.75 \\
255 < \textbf{O} &  0.4843 &   0.1591 &   3.12 &   -0.85 \\
254 > \textbf{C} & -0.6457 &  3.83 & 0.0262   &   -0.75 \\
255 > \textbf{O} &  0.4843 &  3.12 &  0.1591  &   -0.85 \\
256   \textbf{M} & 0.0 & -  &  -  &    1.6 \\
257   \hline
258   \end{tabular}
259 + \label{tab:CO}
260   \end{table}
261  
262   \subsection{Cross-Interactions between the metals and carbon monoxide}
263  
264 < Since the adsorption of CO onto a platinum surface has been the focus
264 > Since the adsorption of CO onto a Pt surface has been the focus
265   of much experimental \cite{Yeo, Hopster:1978, Ertl:1977, Kelemen:1979}
266   and theoretical work
267   \cite{Beurden:2002ys,Pons:1986,Deshlahra:2009,Feibelman:2001,Mason:2004}
268   there is a significant amount of data on adsorption energies for CO on
269 < clean metal surfaces. Parameters reported by Korzeniewski {\it et
270 <  al.}\cite{Pons:1986} were a starting point for our fits, which were
269 > clean metal surfaces. An earlier model by Korzeniewski {\it et
270 >  al.}\cite{Pons:1986} served as a starting point for our fits. The parameters were
271   modified to ensure that the Pt-CO interaction favored the atop binding
272 < position on Pt(111). This resulting binding energies are on the higher
273 < side of the experimentally-reported values. Following Korzeniewski
274 < {\it et al.},\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
272 > position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
273 > The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
274 > than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
275 > et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
276   Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
277   binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
278 < Pt-O interaction was parameterized to a Morse potential with a large
279 < range parameter ($r_o$).  In most cases, this contributes a weak
278 > Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
279 > equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
280 > over O as the surface-binding atom. In most cases, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
281   repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
282   surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
283   (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
# Line 245 | Line 286 | The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were fit using Le
286   %where did you actually get the functionals for citation?
287   %scf calculations, so initial relaxation was of the four layers, but two layers weren't kept fixed, I don't think
288   %same cutoff for slab and slab + CO ? seems low, although feibelmen had values around there...
289 < The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were fit using Lennard-Jones and
289 > The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were also fit using Lennard-Jones and
290   Morse potentials, respectively, to reproduce Au-CO binding energies.
291 <
292 < The fits were refined against gas-surface DFT calculations with a
291 > The limited experimental data for CO adsorption on Au required refining the fits against plane-wave DFT calculations.
292 > Adsorption energies were obtained from gas-surface DFT calculations with a
293   periodic supercell plane-wave basis approach, as implemented in the
294 < {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores are
294 > {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores were
295   described with the projector augmented-wave (PAW)
296   method,\cite{PhysRevB.50.17953,PhysRevB.59.1758} with plane waves
297   included to an energy cutoff of 20 Ry. Electronic energies are
298   computed with the PBE implementation of the generalized gradient
299   approximation (GGA) for gold, carbon, and oxygen that was constructed
300   by Rappe, Rabe, Kaxiras, and Joannopoulos.\cite{Perdew_GGA,RRKJ_PP}
301 < Ionic relaxations were performed until the energy difference between
261 < subsequent steps was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.  In testing the CO-Au
262 < interaction, Au(111) supercells were constructed of four layers of 4
301 > In testing the Au-CO interaction, Au(111) supercells were constructed of four layers of 4
302   Au x 2 Au surface planes and separated from vertical images by six
303 < layers of vacuum space. The surface atoms were all allowed to relax.
304 < Supercell calculations were performed nonspin-polarized with a 4 x 4 x
305 < 4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
306 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
303 > layers of vacuum space. The surface atoms were all allowed to relax
304 > before CO was added to the system. Electronic relaxations were
305 > performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
306 > was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
307 > were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
308 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
309   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
310   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
311   empirical force field.
312  
313   %Hint at future work
314 < The parameters employed in this work are shown in Table 2 and the
315 < binding energies on the 111 surfaces are displayed in Table 3.  To
316 < speed up the computations, charge transfer and polarization are not
317 < being treated in this model, although these effects are likely to
318 < affect binding energies and binding site
319 < preferences.\cite{Deshlahra:2012}
314 > The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
315 > are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
316 > (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
317 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
318 > affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
319 > future work.
320  
321   %Table  of Parameters
322   %Pt Parameter Set 9
323   %Au Parameter Set 35
324   \begin{table}[H]
325 <  \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-CO cross-interactions.   Metal-C
326 <    interactions are modeled with Lennard-Jones potential, while the
327 <    (mostly-repulsive) metal-O interactions were fit to Morse
325 >  \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-CO cross-interactions. Metal-C
326 >    interactions are modeled with Lennard-Jones potentials. While the
327 >    metal-O interactions were fit to Morse
328      potentials.  Distances are given in \AA~and energies in kcal/mol. }
329   \centering
330   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | c | ccc |}
# Line 295 | Line 336 | preferences.\cite{Deshlahra:2012}
336  
337   \hline
338   \end{tabular}
339 + \label{tab:co_parameters}
340   \end{table}
341  
342   %Table of energies
343   \begin{table}[H]
344 <  \caption{Adsorption energies for CO on M(111) using the potentials
345 <    described in this work.  All values are in eV}
344 >  \caption{Adsorption energies for a single CO at the atop site on M(111) at the atop site using the potentials
345 >    described in this work.  All values are in eV.}
346   \centering
347   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc |}
348    \hline
# Line 309 | Line 351 | preferences.\cite{Deshlahra:2012}
351    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
352    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
353   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
354 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
354 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
355    \hline
356   \end{tabular}
357 + \label{tab:co_energies}
358   \end{table}
359  
360   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
361 <
362 < Our model systems are composed of 3888 Pt atoms and XXXX Au atoms in a
363 < FCC crystal that have been cut along the 557 plane so that they are
364 < periodic in the {\it x} and {\it y} directions, and have been rotated
365 < to expose two parallel 557 cuts along the positive and negative {\it
366 <  z}-axis.  Simulations of the bare metal interfaces at temperatures
367 < ranging from 300~K to 1200~K were done to observe the relative
361 > Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
362 > 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
363 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
364 > The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
365 > along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
366 > {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
367 > (557) cuts along the extended {\it z}-axis.  Simulations of the
368 > bare metal interfaces at temperatures ranging from 300~K to
369 > 1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
370   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
371  
372 < The different bulk (and surface) melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
373 < and 2045~K for Pt) suggest that the reconstruction may happen at
374 < different temperatures for the two metals.  To copy experimental
330 < conditions for the CO-exposed surfaces, the bare surfaces were
372 > The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
373 > and 2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
374 > different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
375   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
376 < respectively for 100 ps.  Each surface was exposed to a range of CO
376 > respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
377 > temperatures when no CO was present, but experienced increased surface
378 > mobility on addition of CO. Each surface was then dosed with different concentrations of CO
379   that was initially placed in the vacuum region.  Upon full adsorption,
380 < these amounts correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
381 < coverage.  Because of the difference in binding energies, the platinum
382 < systems very rarely had CO that was not bound to the surface, while
383 < the gold surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
380 > these concentrations correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
381 > coverage. Higher coverages resulted in the formation of a double layer of CO,
382 > which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
383 > Because of the difference in binding energies, nearly all of the CO was bound to the Pt surface, while
384 > the Au surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
385   phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (over
386 < 5 ns) before being shifted to the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
387 < data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40 ns in the
388 < data collection stage, although simulation times for some of the
389 < systems exceeded 200ns.  All simulations were run using the open
390 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,OpenMD}
386 > 5~ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
387 > data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
388 > data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
389 > systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
390 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
391  
345 % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
346 \section{Results}
347 Tao {\it et al.} showed experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
348 undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO
349 adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010} The first reconstruction involves a
350 doubling of the step edge height which is accomplished by a doubling
351 of the plateau length. The second reconstruction led to the formation
352 of triangular clusters that arrange themselves along the lengthened
353 plateaus.
392  
355 The primary observation and results of our simulation is that the
356 presence of CO overlayer on Pt(557) causes the same kind of
357 reconstruction observed experimentally. The 6-atom 111 facets
358 initially become disordered, and after 20-40 ns, a double-layer (with
359 a 2-atom step between terraces) forms.  However, we did not observe
360 the triangular cluster formation that was observed at longer times in
361 the experiments.  Without the CO present on the Pt(557) surface, there
362 was some disorder at the step edges, but no significant restructuring
363 was observed.
393  
365 In these simulations, the Au(557) surface did not exhibit any
366 significant restructuring either with or without the presence of a CO
367 overlayer.
394  
395 < \subsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
396 < An ideal metal surface displaying a low energy (111) face is unlikely
397 < to experience much surface diffusion because of the large vacancy
398 < formation energy for atoms at the surface.  This implies that
399 < significant energy must be expended to lift an atom out of the flat
400 < face so it can migrate on the surface.  Rougher surfaces and those
401 < that already contain numerous adatoms, step edges, and kinks, are
402 < expected to have higher surface diffusion rates.  Metal atoms that are
403 < mobile on the surface were observed to leave and then rejoin step
404 < edges or other formations. They may travel together or as isolated
405 < atoms.  The primary challenge of quantifying the overall surface
406 < mobility is in defining ``mobile'' vs. ``static'' atoms.
395 > % RESULTS
396 > %
397 > \section{Results}
398 > \subsection{Structural remodeling}
399 > The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
400 > to undergo remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 > metal system. The surfaces which were not exposed to CO
402 > did experience minor roughening of the step-edge because
403 > of the elevated temperatures, but the
404 > (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
405 > time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
406 > roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
407 > wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
408 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
409 > compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
410 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
411 > formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
412 > similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
413  
382 A particle was considered mobile once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
383 between saved configurations (XX ps). Restricting the transport
384 calculations to only mobile atoms eliminates all of the bulk metal as
385 well as any surface atoms that remain fixed for a significant length
386 of time.  Since diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by local
387 structures, the diffusion parallel to the step edges was determined
388 separately from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges.  The
389 parallel and perpendicular diffusion constants (determined using
390 linear fits to the mean squared displacement) are shown in figure \ref{fig:diff}.
414  
415 < %While an ideal metallic surface is unlikely to experience much surface diffusion, high-index surfaces have large numbers of low-coordinated atoms which have a much easier time overcoming the energetic barriers limiting diffusion, leading to easier surface reconstructions. Surface movement was divided between the parallel ($\parallel$) and perpendicular ($\perp$) directions relative to the step edge. We were then able to calculate diffusion constants as a function of CO coverage. As can be seen in Table 4, the presence and amount of CO directly affects the diffusion constants of surface platinum atoms. The presence of two 50\% coverage systems is to show how the diffusion process is affected by time. The majority of the systems were run for approximately 50 ns while the half monolayer system has been running continuously. The lowered diffusion constant at longer run times will be examined in-depth in the discussion section.
415 > \subsubsection{Step wandering}
416 > The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417 > movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
418 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
419 > adatoms and step-edges alike, also increased. Additionally,
420 > at the higher coverages on both metals, there was more
421 > step-wandering. Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
422 > did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead preferring
423 > to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in the
424 > original (557) lattice. Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425 > highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426 > when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 > repulsion arises because the entropy of the step-edges is constrained,
428 > since step-edge crossing is not allowed. This entropic repulsion
429 > does not completely define the interactions between steps,
430 > which is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence,
431 > where additional attractive interactions can overcome the
432 > repulsion\cite{Williams:1991} and others will not. The presence and concentration
433 > of adsorbates, as shown in this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially
434 > leading to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
435 >
436 > \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 > Tao et al. have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
439 > The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 > Similar behavior has been seen to occur on numerous surfaces
441 > at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442 > Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443 > propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
444 > because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
445 > The amount of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
446 > adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447 > effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
449 > step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
450 > doubling seen by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
451 > Over longer periods, (150~ns) two more double layers formed
452 > on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
453 > in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454 > general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
455 > 50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
456 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a step-edge.
457  
458 + The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
459 + Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
460 + across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
461 + the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
462 + the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
463 +
464 + \subsection{Dynamics}
465 + Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
466 + with the energetics and structures at different conditions
467 + \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
468 + technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo gives an efficient
469 + sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
470 + of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
471 + Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
472 + of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
473 + $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
474 + the doubling to occur. In this section we give data on dynamic and
475 + transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
476 +
477 +
478 + \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
479 + %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
480 + The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
481 + arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
482 + displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
483 + much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
484 + be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
485 + on higher-index facets provide a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
486 + Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
487 + energetic penalty around $\sim$~40 kcal/mol, but this is significantly easier than lifting
488 + the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
489 + The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
490 + on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, the penalty can fall as low as
491 + $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
492 + diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are
493 + able to explore the terrace before rejoining either the original step-edge or
494 + becoming a part of a different edge. It is a more difficult process for an atom
495 + to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
496 + energy barrier required to lift or lower the adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
497 + metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
498 + diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
499 + observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
500 + equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
501 + At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
502 + observed moving together across the surfaces.
503 +
504 + A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
505 + between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
506 + truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
507 + was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
508 + movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
509 + local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
510 + step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be different
511 + from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
512 + diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
513 +
514 + The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data is likely due
515 + to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower
516 + coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
517 + then further limits the affects of the surface diffusion. The correlation
518 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
519 + definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
520 + explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
521 + the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
522 + stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms. By
523 + performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
524 + (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer,
525 + provides a $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ diffusion constant of $1.69~\pm~0.08$
526 + and a $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ diffusion constant of $6.30~\pm~0.08$.
527 + This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
528 + expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
529 + drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
530 + mechanism of double layer formation show the affect that CO on the
531 + surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
532 + coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
533 + thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
534 + arrangements of CO on the surface allowing the formation of a path,
535 + a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
536 + As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
537 + changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
538 + potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
539 + their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
540 +
541 + \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
542 + The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
543 + CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
544 + a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
545 + has higher diffusion constants but did not show
546 + any signs of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
547 + 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time, while two more were formed as the system was run for an additional
548 + 110~ns (150~ns total). Previous experimental
549 + work gives insight into the upper bounds of the
550 + time required for step coalescence.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
551 + In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
552 + appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
553 + into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
554 + formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
555 + has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
556 + ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
557 + appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
558 + $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
559 + The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
560 + 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper
561 + bounds of the image scan, it is likely that most aspects of this
562 + reconstruction occur very rapidly. A possible explanation
563 + for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
564 + under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
565 + take longer at lower temperatures.
566 +
567 + %Evolution of surface
568   \begin{figure}[H]
569 < \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{DiffusionComparison_error.png}
569 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
570 > \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
571 >  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
572 >  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
573 >  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
574 >  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
575 >  step observed in the later configurations.}
576 >  \label{fig:reconstruct}
577 > \end{figure}
578 >
579 > \begin{figure}[H]
580 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
581   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
582    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
583 <  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the 557 step edges as a function of CO
584 <  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step edge is higher
583 >  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
584 >  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
585    than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
586 <  barrier associated with going from approximately 7 nearest neighbors
587 <  to 5, as compared to the 3 of an adatom. Additionally, the observed
586 >  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
587 >  completely breaking away. Additionally, the observed
588    maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
589    CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
590 <  movement of the platinum atoms around and more importantly across
406 <  the surface. }
590 >  movement of the Pt atoms around and across the surface. }
591   \label{fig:diff}
592   \end{figure}
593  
410 %Table of Diffusion Constants
411 %Add gold?M
412 % \begin{table}[H]
413 %   \caption{}
414 %   \centering
415 % \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | cc | }
416 %   \hline
417 %   &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\textbf{Platinum}}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\textbf{Gold}} \\
418 %   \hline
419 %   \textbf{Surface Coverage} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$  \\
420 %   \hline
421 %   50\% & 4.32(2) & 1.185 $\pm$ 0.008 & 1.72 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.455 $\pm$ 0.006 \\
422 %   33\% & 5.18 $\pm$ 0.03 & 1.999 $\pm$ 0.005 & 1.95 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.337 $\pm$ 0.004  \\
423 %   25\% & 5.01 $\pm$ 0.02 & 1.574 $\pm$ 0.004 & 1.26 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.377 $\pm$ 0.006 \\
424 %   5\%   & 3.61 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.355 $\pm$ 0.002 & 1.84 $\pm$ 0.03 & 0.169 $\pm$ 0.004 \\
425 %   0\%   & 3.27 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.147 $\pm$ 0.004 & 1.50 $\pm$ 0.02 & 0.194 $\pm$ 0.002  \\
426 %   \hline
427 % \end{tabular}
428 % \end{table}
594  
595 +
596 +
597   %Discussion
598   \section{Discussion}
599 + We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
600 + Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
601 + were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
602  
603 < Mechanism for restructuring
603 > \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
604 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
605 > our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
606 > which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
607 > Similarities of our results to those reported previously by
608 > Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} are quite
609 > strong. The simulated Pt
610 > system exposed to a large dosage of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace
611 > widths and step heights. The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a time, but is rapid on experimental timescales.
612 > The adatoms either
613 > break away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift
614 > up onto a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace
615 > until reaching another step-edge or rejoining their original edge.  
616 > This combination of growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of
617 > dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges
618 > meet as shown in Figure 1.B, this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
619 > From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
620  
621 < There are a number of possible mechanisms to explain the role of
622 < adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion
623 < between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
624 < possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
625 < short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
626 < molecules are locked in a specific orientation relative to each other,
627 < this explanation gains some weight.  
621 > A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
622 > CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
623 > CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  However,
624 > the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
625 > some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
626 > relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
627 > gains some credence.  The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
628 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
629 > a  vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
630 > nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
631 > nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO's to leave a purely vertical orientation
632 > also quickly drops the repulsion, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at $\sim$24 degrees between the 2 CO when the carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart.
633 > As mentioned above, the energy barrier for surface diffusion
634 > of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between neighboring CO molecules can
635 > increase the surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt was
636 > examined and while the majority of the CO is on or near the surface throughout
637 > the run, most molecules are mobile. This mobility suggests that the CO are more
638 > likely to shift their positions without necessarily the Pt along with them.
639  
640 < Another possible mechanism for the restructuring is in the
640 > Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
641   destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
642 < Pt atoms.  This could have the effect of increasing surface mobility
643 < of these atoms.  
642 > Pt atoms.  This would then have the effect of increasing surface mobility
643 > of these atoms.  To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
644 > CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
645 > around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. One representative
646 > configuration is displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}. Single or concerted movement
647 > of Pt atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
648 > the movement was forced along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
649 > from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
650 > are displayed in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord} with the corresponding beginning and ending reaction coordinates in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
651 > locations can lead to lowered barriers for Pt breaking apart from the step-edge.
652 > Additionally, as highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
653 > burrowing and lifting of adatoms favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
654 > in terms of energetics.
655  
656 < Comparing the results from simulation to those reported previously by
657 < Tao et al. the similarities in the platinum and CO system are quite
658 < strong. As shown in figure, the simulated platinum system under a CO
659 < atmosphere will restructure slightly by doubling the terrace
660 < heights. The restructuring appears to occur slowly, one to two
661 < platinum atoms at a time. Looking at individual snapshots, these
662 < adatoms tend to either rise on top of the plateau or break away from
663 < the step edge and then diffuse perpendicularly to the step direction
664 < until reaching another step edge. This combination of growth and decay
665 < of the step edges appears to be in somewhat of a state of dynamic
666 < equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges meet as
667 < shown in figure 1.B, this point tends to act as a focus or growth
460 < point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a
461 < zipper. From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed
462 < during the simulation, measuring from the initial appearance of a
463 < growth point, the double layer tends to be fully formed within
464 < $\sim$~35 ns.
656 > %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
657 > \begin{figure}[H]
658 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
659 > \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
660 > for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
661 > placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
662 > The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run. As shown
663 > in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord}, relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
664 > is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
665 > with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
666 > \label{fig:lambda}
667 > \end{figure}
668  
669 + \begin{figure}[H]
670 + \includegraphics[totalheight=0.9\textheight]{lambdaTable.png}
671 + \caption{}
672 + \label{fig:lambdaTable}
673 + \end{figure}
674 +
675 +
676 +
677 + \begin{table}[H]
678 + \caption{}
679 + \centering
680 + \begin{tabular}{| c || c | c | c | c |}
681 + \hline
682 + \textbf{System} & 0.5~\AA & 2~\AA & 4~\AA & 6~\AA \\
683 + \hline
684 + A & 6.38 & 38.34 & 44.65 & 47.60 \\
685 + B & -20.72 & 0.67 & 17.33 & 24.28 \\
686 + C & 4.92 & 27.02 & 41.05 & 47.43 \\
687 + D & -16.97 & 21.21 & 35.87 & 40.93 \\
688 + E & 5.92 & 30.96 & 43.69 & 49.23 \\
689 + F & 8.53 & 46.23 & 53.98 & 65.55 \\
690 + \hline
691 + \end{tabular}
692 + \label{tab:rxcoord}
693 + \end{table}
694 +
695 +
696   \subsection{Diffusion}
697 < As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step edge tends to be much faster than that perpendicular to the step edge. Additionally, the coverage of CO appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Table 4. Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step edge, will allow for a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the more likely a growth point is to be formed. One driving force behind this reconstruction appears to be the lowering of surface energy that occurs by doubling the terrace widths. (I'm not really proving this... I have the surface flatness to show it, but surface energy?)
697 > The diffusion parallel to the step-edge tends to be
698 > much larger than that perpendicular to the step-edge. The dynamic
699 > equilibrium that is established between the step-edge and adatom interface. The coverage
700 > of CO also appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
701 > The
702 > Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation
703 > of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it
704 > appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step-edge, will allow for
705 > a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on
706 > only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the
707 > more likely a growth point is to be formed.
708   \\
709 < \\
710 < %Evolution of surface
709 >
710 >
711 > %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
712   \begin{figure}[H]
713 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
714 < \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
715 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258 ps, (b) 19 ns, (c) 31.2 ns, and
716 <  (d) 86.1 ns. Disruption of the 557 step edges occurs quickly.  The
717 <  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step edges
718 <  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
478 <  step observed in the later configurations.}
713 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
714 > \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
715 > helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
716 > and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
717 > there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
718 > \label{fig:breaking}
719   \end{figure}
720  
721  
722 +
723 +
724   %Peaks!
725 < \begin{figure}[H]
726 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
727 < \caption{}
728 < \end{figure}
725 > %\begin{figure}[H]
726 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
727 > %\caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
728 > %of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
729 > %aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
730 > %\label{fig:peaks}
731 > %\end{figure}
732 >
733 >
734 > %Don't think I need this
735 > %clean surface...
736 > %\begin{figure}[H]
737 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
738 > %\caption{}
739 >
740 > %\end{figure}
741 > %\label{fig:clean}
742 >
743 >
744   \section{Conclusion}
745 + In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
746  
747 + %Things I am not ready to remove yet
748  
749 < \section{Acknowledgments}
749 > %Table of Diffusion Constants
750 > %Add gold?M
751 > % \begin{table}[H]
752 > %   \caption{}
753 > %   \centering
754 > % \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | cc | }
755 > %   \hline
756 > %   &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\textbf{Platinum}}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\textbf{Gold}} \\
757 > %   \hline
758 > %   \textbf{Surface Coverage} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$  \\
759 > %   \hline
760 > %   50\% & 4.32(2) & 1.185(8)  & 1.72(2) & 0.455(6) \\
761 > %   33\% & 5.18(3)  & 1.999(5)  & 1.95(2) & 0.337(4)   \\
762 > %   25\% & 5.01(2)  & 1.574(4)  & 1.26(3) & 0.377(6) \\
763 > %   5\%   & 3.61(2)  & 0.355(2)  & 1.84(3)  & 0.169(4)  \\
764 > %   0\%   & 3.27(2)  & 0.147(4)  & 1.50(2)  & 0.194(2)   \\
765 > %   \hline
766 > % \end{tabular}
767 > % \end{table}
768 >
769 > \begin{acknowledgement}
770   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
771   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
772   Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
773   Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
774 <
774 > \end{acknowledgement}
775   \newpage
776   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
777 < \end{doublespace}
777 > %\end{doublespace}
778 >
779 > \begin{tocentry}
780 > %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
781 > \end{tocentry}
782 >
783   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines