ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3860 by jmichalk, Fri Feb 15 19:15:17 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3877 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 15 13:18:17 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 >
24 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
25 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
26   \usepackage{url}
27   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
28   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
# Line 22 | Line 32
32   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
33   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
34   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
35 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
36  
37 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
38 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
37 > %\citestyle{nature}
38 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
39  
40 < \begin{document}
40 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
41 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
42  
43 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
44 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
45 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
46 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
47 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
48 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
49 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
50  
51 + \keywords{}
52 +
53 + \begin{document}
54 +
55 +
56   %%
57   %Introduction
58   %       Experimental observations
# Line 47 | Line 71
71   %Summary
72   %%
73  
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
74  
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Dec 15, 2012}
62
63 %authors
64
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
67
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
75   \begin{abstract}
76 + We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
77 + various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
78 + explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
79 + and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
80 + as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
81 + this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
82 + strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
83 + role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
84 + small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
85 + was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
86 + is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
87 + systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
88  
89   \end{abstract}
90  
# Line 100 | Line 117 | This work an effort to understand the mechanism and ti
117   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
118   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
119  
120 < This work an effort to understand the mechanism and timescale for
120 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for
121   surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
122 < of the process is of particular interest, we utilize classical force
122 > of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
123   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
124 < computational efficiency necessary to observe the process of interest.
124 > computational efficiency necessary to simulate the process of interest.
125 > Since restructuring typically occurs as a result of specific interactions of the
126 > catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
127 > to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
128 > to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
129 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
130 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
131 > and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
132 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxation to the
133 > 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
134 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
135 > allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
136 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern being greatly
137 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
138 > disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
139 > surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
140 > low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
141  
109 Since restructuring occurs as a result of specific interactions of the
110 catalyst with adsorbates, two metal systems exposed to carbon monoxide
111 were examined in this work. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
112 to reconstruct under certain conditions. The Au(557) surface, because
113 of a weaker interaction with CO, is less likely to undergo this kind
114 of reconstruction.  MORE HERE ON PT AND AU PREVIOUS WORK.
142  
143 +
144   %Platinum molecular dynamics
145   %gold molecular dynamics
146  
147   \section{Simulation Methods}
148 < The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface problem is the
148 > The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface is the
149   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
150   model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
151   adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
# Line 133 | Line 161 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions, while modeling the CO us
161   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
162   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
163   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
164 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions, while modeling the CO using a rigid
164 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{EAM} The CO was modeled using a rigid
165   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
166   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
167   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 146 | Line 174 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al
174   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
175   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
176   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
177 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al.} is among the
177 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is among the
178   fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
179   all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
180   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
# Line 164 | Line 192 | $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is an pairwise term that is meant
192   V_i =  F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]  + \sum_{j \neq i} \phi_{ij}(r_{ij})
193   \end{equation*}
194   where $F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]$ is an energy embedding functional, and
195 < $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is an pairwise term that is meant to represent the
196 < overlap of the two positively charged cores.  
195 > $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is a pairwise term that is meant to represent the
196 > repulsive overlap of the two positively charged cores.  
197  
198   % The {\it modified} embedded atom method (MEAM) adds angular terms to
199   % the electron density functions and an angular screening factor to the
# Line 176 | Line 204 | The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen
204   % metals,\cite{Lee:2001qf} and also interfaces.\cite{Beurden:2002ys})
205   % MEAM presents significant additional computational costs, however.
206  
207 < The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen potentials
207 > The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) potentials
208   have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
209   simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
210   properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
211   melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
212   fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
213   propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
214 < dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} All of these potentials have their
215 < strengths and weaknesses.  One of the strengths common to all of the
216 < methods is the relatively large library of metals for which these
217 < potentials have been
218 < parameterized.\cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
214 > dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
215 > is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
216 > from the original parameterization, where the interactions
217 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
218 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
219 > which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
220 > interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
221 > the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
222 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
223 > treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
224 > theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
225 > \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
226  
227 +
228 +
229 +
230   \subsection{Carbon Monoxide model}
231 < Since previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
232 < the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide, the model
233 < chosen for this molecule exhibits this property in an efficient
234 < manner.  We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
235 < the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
236 < Karplus model is a rigid three site model which places a massless M
237 < site at the center of mass along the CO bond.  The geometry used along
238 < with the interaction parameters are reproduced in Table~1. The effective
231 > Previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
232 > the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}  
233 > We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
234 > the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin because it reproduces
235 > the quadrupole moment well.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
236 > Karplus model treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
237 > site at the molecular center of mass. The geometry and interaction
238 > parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:CO}. The effective
239   dipole moment, calculated from the assigned charges, is still
240   small (0.35 D) while the linear quadrupole (-2.40 D~\AA) is close
241   to the experimental (-2.63 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO} and quantum
# Line 206 | Line 244 | mechanical predictions (-2.46 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO
244   \begin{table}[H]
245    \caption{Positions, Lennard-Jones parameters ($\sigma$ and
246      $\epsilon$), and charges for the CO-CO
247 <    interactions borrowed from Ref. \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are
247 >    interactions in Ref.\bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA, energies are
248      in kcal/mol, and charges are in atomic units.}
249   \centering
250   \begin{tabular}{| c | c | ccc |}
251   \hline
252   &  {\it z} & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & q\\
253   \hline
254 < \textbf{C} & -0.6457 &  0.0262  & 3.83   &   -0.75 \\
255 < \textbf{O} &  0.4843 &   0.1591 &   3.12 &   -0.85 \\
254 > \textbf{C} & -0.6457 &  3.83 & 0.0262   &   -0.75 \\
255 > \textbf{O} &  0.4843 &  3.12 &  0.1591  &   -0.85 \\
256   \textbf{M} & 0.0 & -  &  -  &    1.6 \\
257   \hline
258   \end{tabular}
259 + \label{tab:CO}
260   \end{table}
261  
262   \subsection{Cross-Interactions between the metals and carbon monoxide}
263  
264 < Since the adsorption of CO onto a platinum surface has been the focus
264 > Since the adsorption of CO onto a Pt surface has been the focus
265   of much experimental \cite{Yeo, Hopster:1978, Ertl:1977, Kelemen:1979}
266   and theoretical work
267   \cite{Beurden:2002ys,Pons:1986,Deshlahra:2009,Feibelman:2001,Mason:2004}
268   there is a significant amount of data on adsorption energies for CO on
269 < clean metal surfaces. Parameters reported by Korzeniewski {\it et
270 <  al.}\cite{Pons:1986} were a starting point for our fits, which were
269 > clean metal surfaces. An earlier model by Korzeniewski {\it et
270 >  al.}\cite{Pons:1986} served as a starting point for our fits. The parameters were
271   modified to ensure that the Pt-CO interaction favored the atop binding
272 < position on Pt(111). This resulting binding energies are on the higher
273 < side of the experimentally-reported values. Following Korzeniewski
274 < {\it et al.},\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
272 > position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
273 > The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
274 > than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
275 > et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
276   Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
277   binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
278 < Pt-O interaction was parameterized to a Morse potential with a large
279 < range parameter ($r_o$).  In most cases, this contributes a weak
278 > Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
279 > equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
280 > over O as the surface-binding atom. In most cases, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
281   repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
282   surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
283   (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
# Line 245 | Line 286 | The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were fit using Le
286   %where did you actually get the functionals for citation?
287   %scf calculations, so initial relaxation was of the four layers, but two layers weren't kept fixed, I don't think
288   %same cutoff for slab and slab + CO ? seems low, although feibelmen had values around there...
289 < The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were fit using Lennard-Jones and
289 > The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were also fit using Lennard-Jones and
290   Morse potentials, respectively, to reproduce Au-CO binding energies.
291 <
292 < The fits were refined against gas-surface DFT calculations with a
291 > The limited experimental data for CO adsorption on Au required refining the fits against plane-wave DFT calculations.
292 > Adsorption energies were obtained from gas-surface DFT calculations with a
293   periodic supercell plane-wave basis approach, as implemented in the
294 < {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores are
294 > {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores were
295   described with the projector augmented-wave (PAW)
296   method,\cite{PhysRevB.50.17953,PhysRevB.59.1758} with plane waves
297   included to an energy cutoff of 20 Ry. Electronic energies are
298   computed with the PBE implementation of the generalized gradient
299   approximation (GGA) for gold, carbon, and oxygen that was constructed
300   by Rappe, Rabe, Kaxiras, and Joannopoulos.\cite{Perdew_GGA,RRKJ_PP}
301 < Ionic relaxations were performed until the energy difference between
261 < subsequent steps was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.  In testing the CO-Au
262 < interaction, Au(111) supercells were constructed of four layers of 4
301 > In testing the Au-CO interaction, Au(111) supercells were constructed of four layers of 4
302   Au x 2 Au surface planes and separated from vertical images by six
303 < layers of vacuum space. The surface atoms were all allowed to relax.
304 < Supercell calculations were performed nonspin-polarized with a 4 x 4 x
305 < 4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
306 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
303 > layers of vacuum space. The surface atoms were all allowed to relax
304 > before CO was added to the system. Electronic relaxations were
305 > performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
306 > was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
307 > were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
308 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
309   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
310   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
311   empirical force field.
312  
313   %Hint at future work
314 < The parameters employed in this work are shown in Table 2 and the
315 < binding energies on the 111 surfaces are displayed in Table 3.  To
316 < speed up the computations, charge transfer and polarization are not
317 < being treated in this model, although these effects are likely to
318 < affect binding energies and binding site
319 < preferences.\cite{Deshlahra:2012}
314 > The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
315 > are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
316 > (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
317 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
318 > affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
319 > future work.
320  
321   %Table  of Parameters
322   %Pt Parameter Set 9
323   %Au Parameter Set 35
324   \begin{table}[H]
325 <  \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-CO cross-interactions.   Metal-C
326 <    interactions are modeled with Lennard-Jones potential, while the
327 <    (mostly-repulsive) metal-O interactions were fit to Morse
325 >  \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-CO cross-interactions. Metal-C
326 >    interactions are modeled with Lennard-Jones potentials. While the
327 >    metal-O interactions were fit to Morse
328      potentials.  Distances are given in \AA~and energies in kcal/mol. }
329   \centering
330   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | c | ccc |}
# Line 295 | Line 336 | preferences.\cite{Deshlahra:2012}
336  
337   \hline
338   \end{tabular}
339 + \label{tab:co_parameters}
340   \end{table}
341  
342   %Table of energies
343   \begin{table}[H]
344 <  \caption{Adsorption energies for CO on M(111) using the potentials
345 <    described in this work.  All values are in eV}
344 >  \caption{Adsorption energies for a single CO at the atop site on M(111) at the atop site using the potentials
345 >    described in this work.  All values are in eV.}
346   \centering
347   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc |}
348    \hline
# Line 309 | Line 351 | preferences.\cite{Deshlahra:2012}
351    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
352    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
353   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
354 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
354 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
355    \hline
356   \end{tabular}
357 + \label{tab:co_energies}
358   \end{table}
359  
360   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
361 <
362 < Our model systems are composed of 3888 Pt atoms and 3384 Au atoms in a
363 < FCC crystal that have been cut along the 557 plane so that they are
364 < periodic in the {\it x} and {\it y} directions, and have been rotated
365 < to expose two parallel 557 cuts along the positive and negative {\it
366 <  z}-axis.  Simulations of the bare metal interfaces at temperatures
367 < ranging from 300~K to 1200~K were done to observe the relative
361 > Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
362 > 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
363 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
364 > The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
365 > along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
366 > {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
367 > (557) cuts along the extended {\it z}-axis.  Simulations of the
368 > bare metal interfaces at temperatures ranging from 300~K to
369 > 1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
370   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
371  
372 < The different bulk (and surface) melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
373 < and 2045~K for Pt) suggest that the reconstruction may happen at
374 < different temperatures for the two metals.  To copy experimental
330 < conditions for the CO-exposed surfaces, the bare surfaces were
372 > The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
373 > and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
374 > different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
375   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
376 < respectively for 100 ps.  Each surface was exposed to a range of CO
376 > respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
377 > temperatures when no CO was present, but experienced increased surface
378 > mobility on addition of CO. Each surface was then dosed with different concentrations of CO
379   that was initially placed in the vacuum region.  Upon full adsorption,
380 < these amounts correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
381 < coverage.  Because of the difference in binding energies, the platinum
382 < systems very rarely had CO that was not bound to the surface, while
383 < the gold surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
380 > these concentrations correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
381 > coverage. Higher coverages resulted in the formation of a double layer of CO,
382 > which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
383 > Because of the difference in binding energies, nearly all of the CO was bound to the Pt surface, while
384 > the Au surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
385   phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (over
386 < 5 ns) before being shifted to the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
387 < data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40 ns in the
388 < data collection stage, although simulation times for some of the
389 < systems exceeded 200ns.  All simulations were run using the open
390 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,OpenMD}
386 > 5~ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
387 > data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
388 > data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
389 > systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
390 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
391  
392 < % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
393 < % structure
394 < %       Pt: step wandering, double layers, no triangular motifs
395 < %       Au: step wandering, no double layers
396 < % dynamics
350 < %       diffusion
351 < %       time scale, formation, breakage
392 >
393 >
394 >
395 > % RESULTS
396 > %
397   \section{Results}
398   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
399 < Tao {\it et al.} showed experimentally that the Pt(557) surface undergoes
400 < two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010} The first
401 < reconstruction involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length. Similar
402 < behavior has been seen to occur on numerous surfaces at varying conditions.\cite{}
403 < Of the two systems we examined, the Platinum system showed the most surface
404 < reconstruction. Additionally, the amount of reconstruction appears to be
405 < dependent on the amount of CO adsorbed upon the surface. This result is likely
406 < related to the effect that coverage has on surface diffusion. While both systems
407 < displayed step edge wandering, only the Pt surface underwent doubling within
408 < the time scales we were modeling. Specifically only the 50 \% coverage Pt system
409 < was observed to undergo doubling in the time scales we were able to monitor.
410 < Although, the other Platinum systems tended to show more cumulative lateral movement of
411 < the step edges when compared to the Gold systems. The 50 \% Pt system is highlighted
412 < in figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at various times along the simulation showing
368 < the evolution of the system.
399 > The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
400 > to undergo extensive remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 > systems. The bare metal surfaces
402 > experienced minor roughening of the step-edge because
403 > of the elevated temperatures, but the
404 > (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
405 > time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
406 > roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
407 > wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
408 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
409 > compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
410 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
411 > formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
412 > similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
413  
370 The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by Tao involved the
371 formation of triangular clusters that stretched across the plateau between two step edges.
372 Neither system, within our simulated time scales, experiences this reconstruction. A constructed
373 system in which the triangular motifs were constructed on the surface will be explored in future
374 work and is shown in the supporting information.
414  
415 < \subsection{Dynamics}
416 < While atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces have been performed before \cite{}, they tend to be
417 < performed using Monte Carlo techniques\cite{}. This allows them to efficiently sample the thermodynamic
418 < landscape but at the expense of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous work, using STM (?)\cite{},
419 < has been able to visualize the coalescing of steps of (system). The time scale of the image acquisition
420 < provides an upper bounds for the time required for the doubling to actually occur. While statistical treatments
421 < of step edges are adept at analyzing such systems, it is important to remember that the edges are made
422 < up of individual atoms and thus can be examined in numerous ways.
415 > \subsubsection{Step wandering}
416 > The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417 > movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
418 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
419 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
421 > did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead
422 > preferring to keep nearly the same distance between steps
423 > as in the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA for Pt and $\sim$14\AA for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425 > highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426 > when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 > repulsion arises because step-edge crossing is not allowed
428 > which constrains the entropy. This entropic repulsion does
429 > not completely define the interactions between steps, which
430 > is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence, where
431 > additional attractive interactions can overcome the repulsion.\cite{Williams:1991}
432 > The presence and concentration of adsorbates, as shown in
433 > this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially leading
434 > to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
435  
436 < \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
437 < The movement of a step edge is a cooperative effect arising from the individual movements of the atoms
438 < making up the step. An ideal metal surface displaying a low index facet (111, 100, 110) is unlikely to
439 < experience much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier to lift an atom out of the surface.
440 < For our surfaces, the presence of step edges provide a source for mobile metal atoms. Breaking away
441 < from the step edge is still an energetic penalty around (value) but is much less than lifting the same metal
442 < atom out from the surface and the penalty lowers even further when CO is present in sufficient quantities
443 < on the surface. Once an adatom exists on the surface, its barrier for diffusion is negligible ( < 4 kcal/mole)
444 < and is well able to explore its terrace because both steps act as barriers constraining the area in which
445 < diffusion is allowed. By tracking the mobility of individual metal atoms on the surface we were able to determine
446 < the relative diffusion rates and how varying coverages of CO affected the diffusion constants. Close
447 < observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in equilibrium with the
448 < step edges, constantly breaking apart and rejoining. Additionally, at times their motion was concerted and
449 < two or more atoms would be observed moving together across the surfaces. The primary challenge in quantifying
450 < the overall surface mobility is in defining ``mobile" vs. ``static" atoms.
436 > \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 > Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
439 > The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on numerous surfaces
441 > at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442 > Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443 > propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
444 > because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
445 > The amount of reconstruction is strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446 > adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447 > effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
449 > step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
450 > doubling seen by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
451 > Over longer periods, (150~ns) two more double layers formed
452 > on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
453 > in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454 > general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
455 > 50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
456 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
457  
458 < A particle was considered mobile once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~ between saved configurations
459 < of the system (10-100 ps). An atom that was truly mobile would typically travel much greater than this, but
460 < the 2~\AA~ cutoff was to prevent the in place vibrational movement of atoms from being included in the analysis.
461 < Since diffusion on  a surface is strongly affected by local structures, in this case the presence of single and double
462 < layer step edges, the diffusion parallel to the step edges was determined separately from the diffusion perpendicular
406 < to these edges. The parallel and perpendicular diffusion constants are shown in figure \ref{fig:diff}.
458 > The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
459 > Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
460 > across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
461 > the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
462 > the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
463  
464 < \subsubsection{Double layer formation}
465 < The increased amounts of diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages appears to play a role in the
466 < formation of double layers. Seeing as how that was the only system within our observed simulation time
467 < that showed the formation. As mentioned earlier, previous experimental work has given some insight into
468 < the upper bounds of the time required for enough atoms to move around to allow two steps to coalesce\cite{}.
469 < As seen in figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first appearance of a double layer, a nodal site, appears at 19 ns into
470 < the simulation. Within 10 ns, nearly half of the step has formed the double layer and by 86 ns, the complete
471 < layer has formed. From the appearance of the first node to the complete doubling of the layers, only ~65 ns
472 < have elapsed. The other two layers in this simulation form over a period of ---- and ---- ns respectively.
464 > %Evolution of surface
465 > \begin{figure}[H]
466 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
467 > \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
468 >  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
469 >  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
470 >  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
471 >  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
472 >  step observed in the later configurations.}
473 >  \label{fig:reconstruct}
474 > \end{figure}
475  
476 + \subsection{Dynamics}
477 + Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
478 + with the energetics and structures at different conditions.
479 + \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} Consequently, the most common
480 + technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo approaches give an efficient
481 + sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
482 + of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
483 + Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
484 + of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
485 + $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 + the doubling to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we were able to probe the dynamics of these reconstructions and in this section we give data on dynamic and
487 + transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
488 +
489 +
490 + \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
491 + %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
492 + The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
493 + arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
494 + displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
495 + much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
496 + be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
497 + on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
498 + Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
499 + energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
500 + the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
501 + The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
502 + on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Figures \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} and \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}, the penalty can fall to as low as
503 + $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
504 + diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
505 + able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
506 + becoming a part of a different edge. It is a difficult process for an atom
507 + to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
508 + energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
509 + metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
510 + diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
511 + observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
512 + equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
513 + At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
514 + observed moving together across the surfaces.
515 +
516 + A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
517 + between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
518 + truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
519 + was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
520 + movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
521 + local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
522 + step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
523 + the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
524 + diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
525 +
526 + %Diffusion graph
527   \begin{figure}[H]
528 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
528 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
529   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
530    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
531 <  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the 557 step edges as a function of CO
532 <  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step edge is higher
531 >  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
532 >  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
533    than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
534 <  barrier associated with going from approximately 7 nearest neighbors
535 <  to 5, as compared to the 3 of an adatom. Additionally, the observed
536 <  maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
537 <  CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
538 <  movement of the platinum atoms around and more importantly across
430 <  the surface. }
534 >  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
535 >  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
536 >  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
537 >  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
538 >  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
539   \label{fig:diff}
540   \end{figure}
541  
542 + The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data in Figure \ref{fig:diff} is likely due
543 + to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower observed
544 + coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
545 + then further limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
546 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
547 + definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
548 + explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
549 + the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
550 + stability strongly and many atoms that had been tracked for mobility
551 + data have now been buried. By performing the same diffusion
552 + calculation but on a shorter run time (20~ns), only including data
553 + before the formation of the first double layer, we obtain the larger
554 + values for both $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$
555 + at the 50\% coverage as seen in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
556 + This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
557 + expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
558 + drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
559 + mechanism of double layer formation focuses on the effect that CO on the
560 + surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
561 + coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
562 + thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
563 + arrangements of CO on the surface allowing for the formation of a path,
564 + a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
565 + As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
566 + changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
567 + potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
568 + their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
569 +
570 +
571 +
572 + \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
573 + The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages
574 + plays a primary role in double layer formation. However,
575 + this is not a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
576 + has higher diffusion constants but did not show any signs
577 + of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
578 + 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns
579 + of simulation time, while two more were formed as the
580 + system was allowed to run for an additional
581 + 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction is
582 + a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound
583 + will be lowered as experimental techniques continue to improve.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
584 + In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
585 + appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
586 + into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
587 + formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
588 + has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
589 + ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
590 + appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
591 + $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
592 + The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
593 + 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. A possible explanation
594 + for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
595 + under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
596 + take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally, our measured times for completion
597 + of the doubling after the appearance of a nucleation site are likely affected by our
598 + constrained axes. A longer step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''. However,
599 + the first appearance of a nucleation site will likely occur more quickly due to its stochastic nature.
600 +
601 +
602 +
603 +
604 +
605 +
606 + %Sketch graphic of different configurations
607 + \begin{figure}[H]
608 + \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
609 + \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
610 + the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
611 + upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
612 + complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
613 + Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
614 + \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
615 + \end{figure}
616 +
617 + %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
618 + \begin{figure}[H]
619 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
620 + \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
621 + surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
622 + to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
623 + same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
624 + the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
625 + However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
626 + configurations of CO will be more likely. }
627 + \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
628 + \end{figure}
629 +
630 + %Discussion
631 + \section{Discussion}
632 + We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
633 + Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
634 + were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
635 +
636 + \subsection{Diffusion}
637 + As shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}, for the Pt systems, there
638 + is a strong trend toward higher diffusion constants as
639 + surface coverage of CO increases. The drop for the 50\%
640 + case being explained as double layer formation already
641 + beginning to occur in the analyzed 40~ns, which lowered
642 + the calculated diffusion rates. Between the parallel and
643 + perpendicular rates, the perpendicular diffusion constant
644 + appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
645 + formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
646 + formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
647 + site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
648 + the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective repulsion.
649 + This repulsion must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
650 + A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
651 + and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
652 + to form the nucleation point. Upon that appearance, parallel
653 + diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up the double
654 + layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
655 + the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
656 + appearance of said site was unpredictable.
657 +
658 + \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
659 + Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
660 + our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
661 + which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
662 + Similarities of our results to those reported previously by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
663 + are quite strong. The simulated Pt system exposed to a large dosage
664 + of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace widths and step heights.
665 + The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a
666 + time, but is rapid on experimental timescales. The adatoms either break
667 + away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift up onto
668 + a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace until reaching
669 + another step-edge or rejoining their original edge. This combination of
670 + growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
671 + However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in Figure 1.B,
672 + this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
673 + From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the
674 + initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
675 +
676 + A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
677 + CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
678 + CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  However,
679 + the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
680 + some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
681 + relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
682 + gains some credence. The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
683 + distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
684 + a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
685 + nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
686 + nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical orientation
687 + also lowers the repulsion. A minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at when the
688 + angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}, when the carbons are
689 + locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart. As mentioned above, the energy barrier
690 + for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between
691 + neighboring CO molecules can increase the surface diffusion. However, the
692 + residence time of CO on Pt was examined and while the majority of the CO is
693 + on or near the surface throughout the run, the molecules are extremely mobile,
694 + with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times larger, depending on coverage. This
695 + mobility suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without
696 + necessarily the Pt along with them.
697 +
698 + Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
699 + destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
700 + Pt atoms. To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
701 + CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
702 + around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. A few sample
703 + configurations are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, with
704 + energies at various positions along the path displayed in Table
705 + NO TABLE. Certain configurations of CO, cases B and D for
706 + example, can have quite strong energetic reasons for breaking
707 + away from the step-edge. Although the packing of these configurations
708 + is unlikely until CO coverage has reached a high enough value.
709 + These examples are showing the most difficult cases, immediate
710 + adatom formation through breakage away from the step-edge, which
711 + is why their energies at large distances are relatively high. There are
712 + mechanistic paths where an edge atom could get shifted to onto the
713 + step-edge to form a small peak before fully breaking away. And again,
714 + once the adatom is formed, the barrier for diffusion on the surface is
715 + negligible. These sample configurations help explain CO's effect on
716 + general surface mobility and step wandering, but they are lacking in
717 + providing a mechanism for the formation of double layers. One possible
718 + mechanism is elucidated in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, where a burrowing
719 + and lifting process of an adatom and step-edge atom respectively is
720 + examined. The system, without CO present, is nearly energetically
721 + neutral, whereas with CO present there is a $\sim$ 15 kcal/mol drop
722 + in the energy of the system.
723 +
724 + %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
725 + \begin{figure}[H]
726 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
727 + \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
728 + for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
729 + placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
730 + The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
731 + is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
732 + with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
733 + \label{fig:lambda}
734 + \end{figure}
735 +
736 +
737 +
738 +
739 +
740 + %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
741 + \begin{figure}[H]
742 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
743 + \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
744 + helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
745 + and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
746 + there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
747 + \label{fig:breaking}
748 + \end{figure}
749 +
750 +
751 +
752 +
753 + %Peaks!
754 + %\begin{figure}[H]
755 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
756 + %\caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
757 + %of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
758 + %aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
759 + %\label{fig:peaks}
760 + %\end{figure}
761 +
762 +
763 + %Don't think I need this
764 + %clean surface...
765 + %\begin{figure}[H]
766 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
767 + %\caption{}
768 +
769 + %\end{figure}
770 + %\label{fig:clean}
771 +
772 +
773 + \section{Conclusion}
774 + In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
775 +
776 + %Things I am not ready to remove yet
777 +
778   %Table of Diffusion Constants
779   %Add gold?M
780   % \begin{table}[H]
# Line 451 | Line 795 | have elapsed. The other two layers in this simulation
795   % \end{tabular}
796   % \end{table}
797  
798 < %Discussion
455 < \section{Discussion}
456 <
457 < Mechanism for restructuring
458 <
459 < There are a number of possible mechanisms to explain the role of
460 < adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion
461 < between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
462 < possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
463 < short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
464 < molecules are locked in a specific orientation relative to each other,
465 < this explanation gains some weight.  
466 <
467 < Another possible mechanism for the restructuring is in the
468 < destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
469 < Pt atoms.  This could have the effect of increasing surface mobility
470 < of these atoms.  
471 <
472 < Comparing the results from simulation to those reported previously by
473 < Tao et al. the similarities in the platinum and CO system are quite
474 < strong. As shown in figure, the simulated platinum system under a CO
475 < atmosphere will restructure slightly by doubling the terrace
476 < heights. The restructuring appears to occur slowly, one to two
477 < platinum atoms at a time. Looking at individual snapshots, these
478 < adatoms tend to either rise on top of the plateau or break away from
479 < the step edge and then diffuse perpendicularly to the step direction
480 < until reaching another step edge. This combination of growth and decay
481 < of the step edges appears to be in somewhat of a state of dynamic
482 < equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges meet as
483 < shown in figure 1.B, this point tends to act as a focus or growth
484 < point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a
485 < zipper. From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed
486 < during the simulation, measuring from the initial appearance of a
487 < growth point, the double layer tends to be fully formed within
488 < $\sim$~35 ns.
489 <
490 < \subsection{Diffusion}
491 < As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step edge tends to be much faster than that perpendicular to the step edge. Additionally, the coverage of CO appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Table 4. Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step edge, will allow for a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the more likely a growth point is to be formed. One driving force behind this reconstruction appears to be the lowering of surface energy that occurs by doubling the terrace widths. (I'm not really proving this... I have the surface flatness to show it, but surface energy?)
492 < \\
493 < \\
494 < %Evolution of surface
495 < \begin{figure}[H]
496 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
497 < \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
498 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258 ps, (b) 19 ns, (c) 31.2 ns, and
499 <  (d) 86.1 ns. Disruption of the 557 step edges occurs quickly.  The
500 <  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step edges
501 <  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
502 <  step observed in the later configurations.}
503 <  \label{fig:reconstruct}
504 < \end{figure}
505 <
506 <
507 < %Peaks!
508 < \begin{figure}[H]
509 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
510 < \caption{}
511 < \end{figure}
512 < \begin{figure}[H]
513 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
514 < \caption{}
515 < \end{figure}
516 < \section{Conclusion}
517 <
518 <
519 < \section{Acknowledgments}
798 > \begin{acknowledgement}
799   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
800   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
801   Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
802   Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
803 <
803 > \end{acknowledgement}
804   \newpage
805   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
806 < \end{doublespace}
806 > %\end{doublespace}
807 >
808 > \begin{tocentry}
809 > %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
810 > \end{tocentry}
811 >
812   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines