ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3870 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 8 22:06:22 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3876 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 15 12:51:01 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 >
24 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
25 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
26   \usepackage{url}
27   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
28   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
# Line 22 | Line 32
32   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
33   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
34   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
35 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
36  
37 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
38 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
37 > %\citestyle{nature}
38 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
39  
40 < \begin{document}
40 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
41 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
42  
43 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
44 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
45 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
46 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
47 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
48 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
49 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
50  
51 + \keywords{}
52 +
53 + \begin{document}
54 +
55 +
56   %%
57   %Introduction
58   %       Experimental observations
# Line 47 | Line 71
71   %Summary
72   %%
73  
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
74  
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Mar 5, 2013}
62
63 %authors
64
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
67
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
75   \begin{abstract}
76   We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
77   various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
# Line 112 | Line 117 | This work is an attempt to understand the mechanism an
117   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
118   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
119  
120 < This work is an attempt to understand the mechanism and timescale for
121 < surface restructuring by using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
120 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for
121 > surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
122   of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
123   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
124   computational efficiency necessary to simulate the process of interest.
# Line 123 | Line 128 | and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observ
128   to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
129   The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
130   likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
131 < and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO induced
132 < reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxing of the
133 < 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that a very small number of Au atoms
134 < would become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
135 < allowing the rest of the row to relax and approach the ideal (111)
136 < configuration. They did not see the ``herringbone'' pattern being greatly
137 < affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
138 < disruption of the ``herringbone'' pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
131 > and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
132 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxation to the
133 > 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
134 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
135 > allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
136 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern being greatly
137 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
138 > disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
139   surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
140 < low-coordinated Au particles was the primary driving force for these reconstructions.
140 > low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
141  
142  
143  
# Line 209 | Line 214 | up to the third nearest-neighbor were taken into accou
214   dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
215   is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
216   from the original parameterization, where the interactions
217 < up to the third nearest-neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
217 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
218   Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
219 < which only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
219 > which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
220   interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
221   the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
222   surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
223   treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
224 < theory (DFT) approaches gives EAM, and conclusions derived, a firm theoretical footing.
224 > theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
225   \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
226  
227  
# Line 228 | Line 233 | Karplus model, treats CO as a rigid three site molecul
233   We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
234   the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin because it reproduces
235   the quadrupole moment well.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
236 < Karplus model, treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
236 > Karplus model treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
237   site at the molecular center of mass. The geometry and interaction
238   parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:CO}. The effective
239   dipole moment, calculated from the assigned charges, is still
# Line 300 | Line 305 | zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxe
305   performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
306   was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
307   were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
308 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
308 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
309   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
310   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
311   empirical force field.
# Line 311 | Line 316 | a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire:199
316   (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
317   and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
318   affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
319 < a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire:1994}
319 > future work.
320  
321   %Table  of Parameters
322   %Pt Parameter Set 9
# Line 346 | Line 351 | a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire:199
351    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
352    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
353   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
354 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
354 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
355    \hline
356   \end{tabular}
357   \label{tab:co_energies}
358   \end{table}
359  
360   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
361 < Our Pt system has dimensions of 18~x~24~x~9 in a box of size
362 < 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA while our Au system has
363 < dimensions of 18~x~24~x~8 in a box of size 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
361 > Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
362 > 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
363 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
364   The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
365   along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
366   {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
367   (557) cuts along the extended {\it z}-axis.  Simulations of the
368   bare metal interfaces at temperatures ranging from 300~K to
369 < 1200~K were performed to observe the relative
369 > 1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
370   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
371  
372 < The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
373 < and 2045~K for Pt) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
372 > The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
373 > and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
374   different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
375   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
376   respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
# Line 373 | Line 378 | coverage. Higher coverages resulted in CO double layer
378   mobility on addition of CO. Each surface was then dosed with different concentrations of CO
379   that was initially placed in the vacuum region.  Upon full adsorption,
380   these concentrations correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
381 < coverage. Higher coverages resulted in CO double layer formation, which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
381 > coverage. Higher coverages resulted in the formation of a double layer of CO,
382 > which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
383   Because of the difference in binding energies, nearly all of the CO was bound to the Pt surface, while
384   the Au surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
385   phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (over
386 < 5 ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
387 < data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40 ns in the
388 < data collection stage, although simulation times for some of the
389 < systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were run using the open
386 > 5~ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
387 > data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
388 > data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
389 > systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
390   source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
391  
392 < % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
393 < % structure
394 < %       Pt: step wandering, double layers, no triangular motifs
395 < %       Au: step wandering, no double layers
396 < % dynamics
391 < %       diffusion
392 < %       time scale, formation, breakage
392 >
393 >
394 >
395 > % RESULTS
396 > %
397   \section{Results}
398   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
399 < Tao et al. have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
400 < undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO
401 < adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010} The first involves a doubling of
402 < the step height and plateau length. Similar behavior has been
403 < seen to occur on numerous surfaces at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).
404 < \cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl} Of the two systems
405 < we examined, the Pt system showed a larger amount of
406 < reconstruction when compared to the Au system. The amount
407 < of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
399 > The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
400 > to undergo extensive remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 > systems. The bare metal surfaces
402 > experienced minor roughening of the step-edge because
403 > of the elevated temperatures, but the
404 > (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
405 > time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
406 > roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
407 > wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
408 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
409 > compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
410 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
411 > formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
412 > similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
413 >
414 >
415 > \subsubsection{Step wandering}
416 > The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417 > movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
418 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
419 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
421 > did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead
422 > preferring to keep nearly the same distance between steps
423 > as in the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA for Pt and $\sim$14\AA for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425 > highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426 > when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 > repulsion arises because step-edge crossing is not allowed
428 > which constrains the entropy. This entropic repulsion does
429 > not completely define the interactions between steps, which
430 > is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence, where
431 > additional attractive interactions can overcome the repulsion.\cite{Williams:1991}
432 > The presence and concentration of adsorbates, as shown in
433 > this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially leading
434 > to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
435 >
436 > \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 > Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
439 > The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on numerous surfaces
441 > at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442 > Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443 > propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
444 > because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
445 > The amount of reconstruction is strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447 < effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the surface
448 < diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed step-edge
449 < wandering, only the Pt surface underwent the doubling seen by
450 < Tao et al. within the time scales studied here.  
451 < Only the 50\% coverage Pt system exhibited
452 < a complete doubling in the time scales we
453 < were able to monitor. Over longer periods (150~ns) two more double layers formed on this interface.
454 < Although double layer formation did not occur in the other Pt systems, they show
455 < more lateral movement of the step-edges
456 < compared to their Au counterparts. The 50\% Pt system is highlighted
415 < in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at various times along the simulation
416 < showing the evolution of a step-edge.
447 > effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
449 > step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
450 > doubling seen by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
451 > Over longer periods, (150~ns) two more double layers formed
452 > on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
453 > in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454 > general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
455 > 50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
456 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
457  
458   The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
459   Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
460   across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
461 < the 40~ns time scale, experienced this reconstruction.
461 > the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
462 > the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
463  
464 + %Evolution of surface
465 + \begin{figure}[H]
466 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
467 + \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
468 +  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
469 +  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
470 +  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
471 +  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
472 +  step observed in the later configurations.}
473 +  \label{fig:reconstruct}
474 + \end{figure}
475 +
476   \subsection{Dynamics}
477 < Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces were largely
478 < concerned with the energetics and structures at different conditions
477 > Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
478 > with the energetics and structures at different conditions
479   \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
480 < technique has been Monte Carlo. Monte Carlo gives an efficient
480 > technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo approaches give an efficient
481   sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
482 < of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous work by Pearl and
483 < Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to show the coalescing
482 > of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
483 > Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
484   of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
485 < $\sim$70 s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 < the doubling to occur. In this section we give data on dynamic and
485 > $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 > the doubling to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we were able to probe the dynamics of these reconstructions and in this section we give data on dynamic and
487   transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
488  
489  
490   \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
491   %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
492   The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
493 < arising from the individual movements, primarily through surface
494 < diffusion, of the atoms making up the steps An ideal metal surface
442 < displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100) is unlikely to experience
493 > arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
494 > displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
495   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
496 < be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges
497 < on higher-index surfaces provide a source for mobile metal atoms.
496 > be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
497 > on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
498   Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
499 < energetic penalty around $\sim$~40 kcal/mol, but is much less than lifting
499 > energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
500   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
501   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
502 < on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, the penalty can be as low as
502 > on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Figures \ref{fig:sketchGraphic} and \ref{fig:sketchEnergies}, the penalty can fall to as low as
503   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
504 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol) and these adatoms are well
505 < able to explore the terrace before rejoining either the original step-edge or becoming a part
506 < of a different edge. Atoms traversing separate terraces is a more difficult
507 < process, but can be overcome through a joining and lifting stage which is
508 < examined in the discussion section. By tracking the mobility of individual
504 > diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
505 > able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
506 > becoming a part of a different edge. It is a difficult process for an atom
507 > to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
508 > energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
509   metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
510   diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
511   observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
512   equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
513   At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
514 < observed moving together across the surfaces. The primary challenge in
463 < quantifying the overall surface mobility was in defining ``mobile" vs. ``static" atoms.
514 > observed moving together across the surfaces.
515  
516 < A particle was considered mobile once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
516 > A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
517   between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
518 < truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~ cutoff
519 < was to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
520 < movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on  a surface is strongly affected by
518 > truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
519 > was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
520 > movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
521   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
522 < step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be different
523 < from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
524 < diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
474 <
475 < \subsubsection{Double layer formation dynamics}
476 < The increased amounts of diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages plays a primary role in the formation of the double layers observed on Pt. However, this is not a complete explanation as seen by the 33\% Pt system which has higher diffusion constants but did not show any signs of undergoing the doubling. This difference will be explored more fully in the discussion. On the 50\% Pt system, three separate layers were formed over the extended run time of this system. Previous experimental work has given some insight into the upper bounds of the time required for step coalescing.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl} In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first appearance of a double layer, a nodal site, appears at 19 ns into the simulation. Within 12 ns, nearly half of the step has formed the double layer and by 86 ns, the complete layer has been smoothed. The double layer could be considered ``complete" by 37 ns but is a bit rough or wavy. From the appearance of the first node to the first observed double layer, ignoring roughening, the process took $\sim$20 ns. Another $\sim$40 ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in this simulation form over a period of 22 ns and 42 ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper bounds of the image scan, it is likely that aspects of this reconstruction occur very quickly. A possible explanation for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures our systems were run at. It is likely that the process would take longer at lower temperatures and is an area of exploration for future work.
477 <
478 < %Evolution of surface
479 < \begin{figure}[H]
480 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
481 < \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
482 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258 ps, (b) 19 ns, (c) 31.2 ns, and
483 <  (d) 86.1 ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
484 <  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
485 <  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
486 <  step observed in the later configurations.}
487 <  \label{fig:reconstruct}
488 < \end{figure}
522 > step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
523 > the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
524 > diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
525  
526 + %Diffusion graph
527   \begin{figure}[H]
528 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
528 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
529   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
530    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
531    ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
532    surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
533    than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
534    barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
535 <  completely breaking away. Additionally, the observed
536 <  maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
537 <  CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
538 <  movement of the Pt atoms around and across the surface. }
535 >  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
536 >  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
537 >  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
538 >  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
539   \label{fig:diff}
540   \end{figure}
541  
542 + The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data in Figure \ref{fig:diff} is likely due
543 + to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower observed
544 + coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
545 + then further limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
546 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
547 + definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
548 + explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
549 + the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
550 + stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms and so
551 + atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have now been buried. By
552 + performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
553 + (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer, we obtain
554 + the larger values for both $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ at the 50\% coverage.
555 + This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
556 + expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
557 + drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
558 + mechanism of double layer formation focuses on the effect that CO on the
559 + surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
560 + coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
561 + thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
562 + arrangements of CO on the surface allowing the formation of a path,
563 + a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
564 + As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
565 + changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
566 + potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
567 + their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
568  
569  
570  
571 + \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
572 + The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
573 + CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
574 + a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
575 + has higher diffusion constants but did not show
576 + any signs of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
577 + 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time, while two more were formed as the system was run for an additional
578 + 110~ns (150~ns total). Previous experimental
579 + work gives insight into the upper bounds of the
580 + time required for step coalescence.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
581 + In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
582 + appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
583 + into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
584 + formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
585 + has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
586 + ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
587 + appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
588 + $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
589 + The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
590 + 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper
591 + bounds of the image scan, it is likely that most aspects of this
592 + reconstruction occur very rapidly. A possible explanation
593 + for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
594 + under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
595 + take longer at lower temperatures.
596 +
597 +
598 +
599 +
600 +
601 +
602 + %Sketch graphic of different configurations
603 + \begin{figure}[H]
604 + \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
605 + \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
606 + the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
607 + upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
608 + complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
609 + Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
610 + \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
611 + \end{figure}
612 +
613 + %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
614 + \begin{figure}[H]
615 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
616 + \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
617 + surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
618 + to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
619 + same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
620 + the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
621 + However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
622 + configurations of CO will be more likely. }
623 + \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
624 + \end{figure}
625 +
626   %Discussion
627   \section{Discussion}
628 < In this paper we have shown that we were able to accurately model the initial reconstruction of the
628 > We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
629   Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
630 < were able to observe the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
630 > were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
631  
632 + \subsection{Diffusion}
633 + As shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}, for the Pt systems, there
634 + is a strong trend toward higher diffusion constants as
635 + surface coverage of CO increases. The drop for the 50\%
636 + case being explained as double layer formation already
637 + beginning to occur in the analyzed 40~ns, which lowered
638 + the calculated diffusion rates. Between the parallel and
639 + perpendicular rates, the perpendicular diffusion constant
640 + appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
641 + formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
642 + formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
643 + site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
644 + the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective repulsion.
645 + This repulsion must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
646 + A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
647 + and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
648 + to form the nucleation point. Upon that appearance, parallel
649 + diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up the double
650 + layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
651 + the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
652 + appearance of said site was unpredictable.
653 +
654   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
655 < Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
656 < our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
657 < which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
658 < Comparing the results from this simulation to those reported previously by
659 < Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} the similarities in the Pt-CO system are quite
660 < strong. As shown in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the simulated Pt
661 < system exposed to a large dosage of CO will restructure by doubling the terrace
662 < widths and step heights. The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a time and as such is a fairly stochastic event.
663 < Looking at individual configurations of the system, the adatoms either
664 < break away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift
665 < up onto the higher terrace. Once ``free'', they will diffuse on the terrace
666 < until reaching another step-edge or rejoining their original edge.  
667 < This combination of growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of
668 < dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges
669 < meet as shown in Figure 1.B, this meeting point tends to act as a focus
670 < or growth point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a zipper.
531 < From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed during the
532 < simulation, measuring from the initial appearance of a growth point, the
533 < double layer tends to be fully formed within $\sim$35 ns.
655 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
656 > our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
657 > which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
658 > Similarities of our results to those reported previously by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
659 > are quite strong. The simulated Pt system exposed to a large dosage
660 > of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace widths and step heights.
661 > The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a
662 > time, but is rapid on experimental timescales. The adatoms either break
663 > away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift up onto
664 > a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace until reaching
665 > another step-edge or rejoining their original edge. This combination of
666 > growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
667 > However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in Figure 1.B,
668 > this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
669 > From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the
670 > initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
671  
672   A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
673   CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
674 < CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one likely possibility.  However,
674 > CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  However,
675   the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
676   some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
677   relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
678 < gains some weight.  The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
679 < distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) with both in
680 < a  vertical orientation is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
678 > gains some credence. The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
679 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
680 > a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
681   nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
682 < nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO's to leave a purely vertical orientation
683 < also quickly drops the repulsion, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at $\sim$24 degrees between the 2 CO when the carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart.
684 < As mentioned above, the energy barrier for surface diffusion
685 < of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between CO can help
686 < increase the surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt was
687 < examined and while the majority of the CO is on or near the surface throughout
688 < the run, it is extremely mobile. This mobility suggests that the CO are more
689 < likely to shift their positions without necessarily dragging the Pt along with them.
682 > nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical orientation
683 > also lowers the repulsion. A minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at when the
684 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}, when the carbons are
685 > locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart. As mentioned above, the energy barrier
686 > for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between
687 > neighboring CO molecules can increase the surface diffusion. However, the
688 > residence time of CO on Pt was examined and while the majority of the CO is
689 > on or near the surface throughout the run, the molecules are extremely mobile,
690 > with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times larger, depending on coverage. This
691 > mobility suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without
692 > necessarily the Pt along with them.
693  
694   Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
695   destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
696 < Pt atoms.  This would then have the effect of increasing surface mobility
557 < of these atoms.  To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
696 > Pt atoms. To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
697   CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
698 < around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. One representative
699 < configuration is displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}. Single or concerted movement
700 < of Pt atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
701 < the movement was forced along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
702 < from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
703 < are displayed in Table \ref{tab:energies}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
704 < locations can lead to lowered barriers for Pt breaking apart from the step-edge.
705 < Additionally, as highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
706 < burrowing and lifting of adatoms favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
707 < in terms of energetics.
698 > around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. A few sample
699 > configurations are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}, with
700 > energies at various positions along the path displayed in Table
701 > \ref{tab:rxcoord}. Certain configurations of CO, cases B and D for
702 > example, can have quite strong energetic reasons for breaking
703 > away from the step-edge. Although the packing of these configurations
704 > is unlikely until CO coverage has reached a high enough value.
705 > These examples are showing the most difficult cases, immediate
706 > adatom formation through breakage away from the step-edge, which
707 > is why their energies at large distances are relatively high. There are
708 > mechanistic paths where an edge atom could get shifted to onto the
709 > step-edge to form a small peak before fully breaking away. And again,
710 > once the adatom is formed, the barrier for diffusion on the surface is
711 > negligible. These sample configurations help explain CO's effect on
712 > general surface mobility and step wandering, but they are lacking in
713 > providing a mechanism for the formation of double layers. One possible
714 > mechanism is elucidated in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, where a burrowing
715 > and lifting process of an adatom and step-edge atom respectively is
716 > examined. The system, without CO present, is nearly energetically
717 > neutral, whereas with CO present there is a $\sim$ 15 kcal/mol drop
718 > in the energy of the system.
719  
720   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
721   \begin{figure}[H]
722 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO.png}
722 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
723   \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
724   for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
725   placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
726 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run. As shown
577 < in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord}, relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
726 > The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
727   is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
728   with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
729   \label{fig:lambda}
# Line 582 | Line 731 | in terms of energetics.
731  
732  
733  
585 \subsection{Diffusion}
586 As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step-edge tends to be
587 much larger than that perpendicular to the step-edge, likely because of the dynamic
588 equilibrium that is established between the step-edge and adatom interface. The coverage
589 of CO also appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
590 The
591 Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation
592 of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it
593 appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step-edge, will allow for
594 a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on
595 only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the
596 more likely a growth point is to be formed.
597 \\
734  
735  
736   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
737   \begin{figure}[H]
738   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
739 < %:
604 < \caption{(A)  0 ps, (B) 100 ps, (C) 1 ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
739 > \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
740   helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
741   and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
742   there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
# Line 612 | Line 747 | more likely a growth point is to be formed.
747  
748  
749   %Peaks!
750 < \begin{figure}[H]
751 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
752 < \caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
753 < of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
754 < aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
755 < \label{fig:peaks}
756 < \end{figure}
750 > %\begin{figure}[H]
751 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
752 > %\caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
753 > %of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
754 > %aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
755 > %\label{fig:peaks}
756 > %\end{figure}
757  
758  
759   %Don't think I need this
# Line 656 | Line 791 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
791   % \end{tabular}
792   % \end{table}
793  
794 < \section{Acknowledgments}
794 > \begin{acknowledgement}
795   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
796   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
797   Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
798   Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
799 <
799 > \end{acknowledgement}
800   \newpage
801   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
802 < \end{doublespace}
802 > %\end{doublespace}
803 >
804 > \begin{tocentry}
805 > %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
806 > \end{tocentry}
807 >
808   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines