ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3870 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 8 22:06:22 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3886 by jmichalk, Wed Mar 20 19:03:36 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 > \usepackage{wrapfig}
24 > \mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
25 > %\usepackage{epstopdf}
26 >
27 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
28 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
29   \usepackage{url}
30   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
31   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
32 < 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
32 > 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=1110000
33  
34   % double space list of tables and figures
35   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
36   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
37   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
38 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
39  
40 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
41 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
40 > %\citestyle{nature}
41 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
42  
43 < \begin{document}
43 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
44 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
45  
46 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
47 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
48 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
49 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
50 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
51 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
52 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
53  
54 + \keywords{}
55 +
56 + \begin{document}
57 +
58 +
59   %%
60   %Introduction
61   %       Experimental observations
# Line 47 | Line 74
74   %Summary
75   %%
76  
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
77  
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Mar 5, 2013}
62
63 %authors
64
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
67
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
78   \begin{abstract}
79 < We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
80 < various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
81 < explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
82 < and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
83 < as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
84 < this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
85 < strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
86 < role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
87 < small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
88 < was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
89 < is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
90 < systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
83 <
79 >  The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557) and
80 >  Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO) were
81 >  investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
82 >  interactions were parameterized from experimental data and
83 >  plane-wave Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large
84 >  difference in binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions
85 >  was found to play a significant role in step-edge stability and
86 >  adatom diffusion constants.  Various mechanisms for CO-mediated step
87 >  wandering and step doubling were investigated on the Pt(557)
88 >  surface.  We find that the energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
89 >  can explain the step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and
90 >  the lack of such a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
91   \end{abstract}
92  
93   \newpage
# Line 112 | Line 119 | This work is an attempt to understand the mechanism an
119   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
120   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
121  
122 < This work is an attempt to understand the mechanism and timescale for
123 < surface restructuring by using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
122 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for the Pt(557) \& Au(557)
123 > surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
124   of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
125   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
126   computational efficiency necessary to simulate the process of interest.
# Line 121 | Line 128 | The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction w
128   catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
129   to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
130   to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
131 < The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
132 < likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
133 < and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO induced
134 < reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxing of the
135 < 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that a very small number of Au atoms
136 < would become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
137 < allowing the rest of the row to relax and approach the ideal (111)
138 < configuration. They did not see the ``herringbone'' pattern being greatly
139 < affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
140 < disruption of the ``herringbone'' pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
131 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is less
132 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters {\it et al}.\cite{Peters:2000}
133 > and Piccolo {\it et al}.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
134 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters {\it et al}. saw a relaxation to the
135 > 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
136 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction, while
137 > allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
138 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern on Au(111) being greatly
139 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo {\it et al}. on the other hand, did see a
140 > disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
141   surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
142 < low-coordinated Au particles was the primary driving force for these reconstructions.
142 > low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
143  
144  
145  
# Line 144 | Line 151 | adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite l
151   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
152   model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
153   adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
154 < 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
154 > 10$^4$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
155   molecular dynamics
156   (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
157   methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
# Line 156 | Line 163 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was mod
163   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
164   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
165   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
166 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was modeled using a rigid
166 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{Foiles86} The CO was modeled using a rigid
167   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
168   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
169   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 169 | Line 176 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is
176   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
177   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
178   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
179 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is among the
180 < fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
181 < all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
179 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88} is among the
180 > fastest of these density functional approaches. In
181 > all of these models, atoms are treated as a positively charged
182   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
183   calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
184   the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
# Line 202 | Line 209 | properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007
209   The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) potentials
210   have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
211   simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
212 < properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
212 > properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq,mishin99:_inter}
213   melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
214 < fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
215 < propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
216 < dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
214 > fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx,mishin01:cu} crack
215 > propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg,Rifkin1992} and alloying
216 > dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni} One of EAM's strengths
217   is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
218 < from the original parameterization, where the interactions
219 < up to the third nearest-neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
220 < Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
221 < which only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
218 > because interactions
219 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account in the parameterization.\cite{Voter95a}
220 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88}
221 > which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
222   interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
223   the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
224 < surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
224 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAM's functional
225   treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
226 < theory (DFT) approaches gives EAM, and conclusions derived, a firm theoretical footing.
220 < \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
226 > theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
227  
228  
229  
230  
231 +
232   \subsection{Carbon Monoxide model}
233   Previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
234   the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}  
235   We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
236   the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin because it reproduces
237   the quadrupole moment well.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
238 < Karplus model, treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
238 > Karplus model treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
239   site at the molecular center of mass. The geometry and interaction
240   parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:CO}. The effective
241   dipole moment, calculated from the assigned charges, is still
# Line 267 | Line 274 | et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit t
274   position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
275   The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
276   than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
277 < et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
278 < Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
277 > {\it et al}.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
278 > Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged, partial
279   binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
280   Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
281   equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
282 < over O as the surface-binding atom. In most cases, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
282 > over O as the surface-binding atom. In most geometries, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
283   repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
284   surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
285   (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
# Line 300 | Line 307 | zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxe
307   performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
308   was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
309   were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
310 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
310 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
311   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
312   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
313   empirical force field.
# Line 309 | Line 316 | and polarization are neglected in this model, although
316   The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
317   are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
318   (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
319 < and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
320 < affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
314 < a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire:1994}
319 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects could have
320 > an effect on  binding energies and binding site preferences.
321  
322   %Table  of Parameters
323   %Pt Parameter Set 9
# Line 346 | Line 352 | a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire:199
352    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
353    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
354   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
355 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
355 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
356    \hline
357   \end{tabular}
358   \label{tab:co_energies}
359   \end{table}
360  
361   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
362 < Our Pt system has dimensions of 18~x~24~x~9 in a box of size
363 < 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA while our Au system has
364 < dimensions of 18~x~24~x~8 in a box of size 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
362 > Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
363 > 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
364 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA. The metal slabs
365 > are 9 and 8 atoms deep respectively, corresponding to a slab
366 > thickness of $\sim$21~\AA~ for Pt and $\sim$19~\AA~for Au.
367   The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
368   along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
369   {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
370   (557) cuts along the extended {\it z}-axis.  Simulations of the
371   bare metal interfaces at temperatures ranging from 300~K to
372 < 1200~K were performed to observe the relative
372 > 1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
373   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
374  
375 < The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
376 < and 2045~K for Pt) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
375 > The different bulk melting temperatures predicted by EAM (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
376 > and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
377   different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
378   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
379   respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
# Line 373 | Line 381 | coverage. Higher coverages resulted in CO double layer
381   mobility on addition of CO. Each surface was then dosed with different concentrations of CO
382   that was initially placed in the vacuum region.  Upon full adsorption,
383   these concentrations correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
384 < coverage. Higher coverages resulted in CO double layer formation, which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
384 > coverage. Higher coverages resulted in the formation of a double layer of CO,
385 > which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
386   Because of the difference in binding energies, nearly all of the CO was bound to the Pt surface, while
387   the Au surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
388   phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (over
389 < 5 ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
390 < data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40 ns in the
391 < data collection stage, although simulation times for some of the
392 < systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were run using the open
393 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
389 > 5~ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
390 > data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
391 > data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
392 > systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
393 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,openmd}
394  
395 < % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
396 < % structure
397 < %       Pt: step wandering, double layers, no triangular motifs
398 < %       Au: step wandering, no double layers
399 < % dynamics
391 < %       diffusion
392 < %       time scale, formation, breakage
395 >
396 >
397 >
398 > % RESULTS
399 > %
400   \section{Results}
401   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
402 < Tao et al. have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
403 < undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO
404 < adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010} The first involves a doubling of
405 < the step height and plateau length. Similar behavior has been
406 < seen to occur on numerous surfaces at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).
407 < \cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl} Of the two systems
408 < we examined, the Pt system showed a larger amount of
409 < reconstruction when compared to the Au system. The amount
410 < of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
402 > The bare metal surfaces experienced minor roughening of the
403 > step-edge because of the elevated temperatures, but the (557)
404 > face was stable throughout the simulations. The surface of both
405 > systems, upon dosage of CO, began to undergo extensive remodeling
406 > that was not observed in the bare systems. Reconstructions of
407 > the Au systems were limited to breakup of the step-edges and
408 > some step wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
409 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent. The 50\% coverage
410 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it formed
411 > well-defined and stable double layers through step coalescence,
412 > similar to results reported by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}
413 >
414 >
415 > \subsubsection{Step wandering}
416 > The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417 > step-wandering at their respective temperatures. As the CO
418 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface atoms,
419 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system where step
421 > coalescence occurred, the step-edges in the other simulations
422 > preferred to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in
423 > the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA~for Pt and $\sim$14\AA~for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams {\it et al}.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425 > highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426 > when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 > repulsion is caused by an entropic barrier that arises from
428 > the fact that steps cannot cross over one another. This entropic
429 > repulsion does not completely define the interactions between
430 > steps, however, so it is possible to observe step coalescence
431 > on some surfaces.\cite{Williams:1991} The presence and
432 > concentration of adsorbates, as shown in this work, can
433 > affect step-step interactions, potentially leading to a new
434 > surface structure as the thermodynamic equilibrium.
435 >
436 > \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.
439 > The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on a number of surfaces
441 > at varying conditions, including Ni(977) and Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442 > Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443 > propensity for reconstruction  
444 > because of the larger surface mobility and the greater extent of step wandering.
445 > The amount of reconstruction was strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447 < effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the surface
448 < diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed step-edge
449 < wandering, only the Pt surface underwent the doubling seen by
450 < Tao et al. within the time scales studied here.  
451 < Only the 50\% coverage Pt system exhibited
452 < a complete doubling in the time scales we
453 < were able to monitor. Over longer periods (150~ns) two more double layers formed on this interface.
454 < Although double layer formation did not occur in the other Pt systems, they show
455 < more lateral movement of the step-edges
414 < compared to their Au counterparts. The 50\% Pt system is highlighted
415 < in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at various times along the simulation
416 < showing the evolution of a step-edge.
447 > effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. Only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
449 > doubling seen by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
450 > Over a longer time scale (150~ns) two more double layers formed
451 > on this surface. Although double layer formation did not occur
452 > in the other Pt systems, they exhibited more step-wandering and
453 > roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
454 > 50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
455 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
456  
457 < The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
458 < Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
459 < across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
460 < the 40~ns time scale, experienced this reconstruction.
457 > The second reconstruction observed by
458 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
459 > across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither metal, within
460 > the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
461 > the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
462  
463 + %Evolution of surface
464 + \begin{figure}[H]
465 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation}
466 + \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
467 +  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
468 +  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
469 +  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
470 +  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
471 +  step observed in the later configurations.}
472 +  \label{fig:reconstruct}
473 + \end{figure}
474 +
475   \subsection{Dynamics}
476 < Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces were largely
477 < concerned with the energetics and structures at different conditions
478 < \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
479 < technique has been Monte Carlo. Monte Carlo gives an efficient
480 < sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
481 < of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous work by Pearl and
482 < Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to show the coalescing
483 < of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
432 < $\sim$70 s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
433 < the doubling to occur. In this section we give data on dynamic and
434 < transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
476 > Previous experimental work by Pearl and Sibener\cite{Pearl},
477 > using STM, has been able to capture the coalescence of steps
478 > on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition, $\sim$70~s/image,
479 > provides an upper bound for the time required for the doubling
480 > to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we are able to probe
481 > the dynamics of these reconstructions at elevated temperatures
482 > and in this section we provide data on the timescales for transport
483 > properties, e.g. diffusion and layer formation time.
484  
485  
486   \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
487   %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
488 < The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
489 < arising from the individual movements, primarily through surface
490 < diffusion, of the atoms making up the steps An ideal metal surface
442 < displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100) is unlikely to experience
488 > The wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
489 > arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
490 > displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
491   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
492 < be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges
493 < on higher-index surfaces provide a source for mobile metal atoms.
494 < Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
495 < energetic penalty around $\sim$~40 kcal/mol, but is much less than lifting
492 > be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
493 > on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
494 > Single-atom break-away from a step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
495 > energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
496   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
497   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
498 < on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, the penalty can be as low as
498 > on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Discussion, the penalty can fall to as low as
499   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
500 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol) and these adatoms are well
501 < able to explore the terrace before rejoining either the original step-edge or becoming a part
502 < of a different edge. Atoms traversing separate terraces is a more difficult
503 < process, but can be overcome through a joining and lifting stage which is
504 < examined in the discussion section. By tracking the mobility of individual
500 > diffusion is negligible (\textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
501 > able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
502 > becoming a part of a different edge. It is an energetically unfavorable process with a high barrier for an atom
503 > to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
504 > energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
505   metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
506   diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
507   observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
508 < equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
508 > equilibrium with the step-edges.
509   At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
510 < observed moving together across the surfaces. The primary challenge in
463 < quantifying the overall surface mobility was in defining ``mobile" vs. ``static" atoms.
510 > observed moving together across the surfaces.
511  
512 < A particle was considered mobile once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
513 < between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
514 < truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~ cutoff
515 < was to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
516 < movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on  a surface is strongly affected by
512 > A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
513 > between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). A mobile atom
514 > would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
515 > was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
516 > movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
517   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
518 < step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be different
519 < from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
518 > step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
519 > the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
520   diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
474
475 \subsubsection{Double layer formation dynamics}
476 The increased amounts of diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages plays a primary role in the formation of the double layers observed on Pt. However, this is not a complete explanation as seen by the 33\% Pt system which has higher diffusion constants but did not show any signs of undergoing the doubling. This difference will be explored more fully in the discussion. On the 50\% Pt system, three separate layers were formed over the extended run time of this system. Previous experimental work has given some insight into the upper bounds of the time required for step coalescing.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl} In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first appearance of a double layer, a nodal site, appears at 19 ns into the simulation. Within 12 ns, nearly half of the step has formed the double layer and by 86 ns, the complete layer has been smoothed. The double layer could be considered ``complete" by 37 ns but is a bit rough or wavy. From the appearance of the first node to the first observed double layer, ignoring roughening, the process took $\sim$20 ns. Another $\sim$40 ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in this simulation form over a period of 22 ns and 42 ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper bounds of the image scan, it is likely that aspects of this reconstruction occur very quickly. A possible explanation for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures our systems were run at. It is likely that the process would take longer at lower temperatures and is an area of exploration for future work.
477
478 %Evolution of surface
479 \begin{figure}[H]
480 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
481 \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
482  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258 ps, (b) 19 ns, (c) 31.2 ns, and
483  (d) 86.1 ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
484  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
485  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
486  step observed in the later configurations.}
487  \label{fig:reconstruct}
488 \end{figure}
521  
522 + %Diffusion graph
523   \begin{figure}[H]
524 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
524 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1}
525   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
526    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
527    ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
528    surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
529    than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
530    barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
531 <  completely breaking away. Additionally, the observed
532 <  maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
533 <  CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
534 <  movement of the Pt atoms around and across the surface. }
531 >  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
532 >  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
533 >  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
534 >  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
535   \label{fig:diff}
536   \end{figure}
537  
538 + The weaker Au-CO interaction is evident in the weak CO-coverage
539 + dependance of Au diffusion. This weak interaction leads to lower
540 + observed coverages when compared to dosage amounts. This further
541 + limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
542 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates shows a near linear relationship
543 + at the earliest times in the simulations. Following double layer formation,
544 + however, there is a precipitous drop in adatom diffusion. As the double
545 + layer forms, many atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have
546 + now been buried resulting in a smaller reported diffusion constant. A
547 + secondary effect of higher coverages is CO-CO cross interactions that
548 + lower the effective mobility of the Pt adatoms that are bound to each CO.
549 + This effect would become evident only at higher coverages. A detailed
550 + account of Pt adatom energetics follows in the Discussion.
551 +
552  
553 + \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
554 + The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages is the primary
555 + contributor to double layer formation. However, this is not a complete
556 + explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system has higher diffusion constants, but
557 + did not show any signs of edge doubling in 40~ns. On the 50\%~Pt
558 + system, one double layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time,
559 + while two more were formed as the system was allowed to run for an
560 + additional 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction
561 + is a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound is a
562 + very large overestimate.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl} In this system the first
563 + appearance of a double layer appears at 19~ns into the simulation.
564 + Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has formed
565 + the double layer and by 86~ns the complete layer has flattened out.
566 + From the appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed
567 + double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another $\sim$40~ns was
568 + necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in
569 + this simulation formed over periods of 22~ns and 42~ns respectively.
570 + A possible explanation for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated
571 + temperatures under which our systems were simulated. The process
572 + would almost certainly take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally,
573 + our measured times for completion of the doubling after the appearance
574 + of a nucleation site are likely affected by our periodic boxes. A longer
575 + step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''.
576  
577  
578   %Discussion
579   \section{Discussion}
580 < In this paper we have shown that we were able to accurately model the initial reconstruction of the
581 < Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
582 < were able to observe the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
580 > We have shown that a classical potential is able to model the initial
581 > reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption, and have
582 > reproduced the double layer structure observed by Tao {\it et
583 >  al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. Additionally, this reconstruction appears to be
584 > rapid -- occurring within 100 ns of the initial exposure to CO.  Here
585 > we discuss the features of the classical potential that are
586 > contributing to the stability and speed of the Pt(557) reconstruction.
587  
588 + \subsection{Diffusion}
589 + The perpendicular diffusion constant appears to be the most important
590 + indicator of double layer formation. As highlighted in Figure
591 + \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the formation of the double layer did not begin
592 + until a nucleation site appeared.  Williams {\it et
593 +  al}.\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} cite an effective edge-edge
594 + repulsion arising from the inability of edge crossing.  This repulsion
595 + must be overcome to allow step coalescence.  A larger
596 + $\textbf{D}_\perp$ value implies more step-wandering and a larger
597 + chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges to create a nucleation
598 + point.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a
599 + nascent double layer. This helps explain the rapid time scale for
600 + double layer completion after the appearance of a nucleation site, while
601 + the initial appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
602 +
603   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
604 < Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
605 < our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
606 < which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
607 < Comparing the results from this simulation to those reported previously by
608 < Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} the similarities in the Pt-CO system are quite
609 < strong. As shown in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the simulated Pt
610 < system exposed to a large dosage of CO will restructure by doubling the terrace
611 < widths and step heights. The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a time and as such is a fairly stochastic event.
612 < Looking at individual configurations of the system, the adatoms either
613 < break away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift
614 < up onto the higher terrace. Once ``free'', they will diffuse on the terrace
615 < until reaching another step-edge or rejoining their original edge.  
616 < This combination of growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of
617 < dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges
618 < meet as shown in Figure 1.B, this meeting point tends to act as a focus
619 < or growth point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a zipper.
620 < From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed during the
621 < simulation, measuring from the initial appearance of a growth point, the
622 < double layer tends to be fully formed within $\sim$35 ns.
604 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of our
605 > simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system which
606 > did exhibit doubling. A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain
607 > the role of adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar
608 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
609 > possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
610 > short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
611 > molecules are ``locked'' in a vertical orientation, through atop
612 > adsorption for example, this explanation would gain credence. The
613 > calculated energetic repulsion between two CO molecules located a
614 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both
615 > in a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the
616 > second nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to
617 > nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical
618 > orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the carbons are locked at
619 > a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached when the
620 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.  The calculated
621 > barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
622 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the
623 > surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests
624 > that the CO molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40
625 > to 2500 times larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests
626 > that the CO molecules jump between different Pt atoms throughout the
627 > simulation, but can stay bound for significant periods of time.
628  
629 < A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
630 < CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
631 < CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one likely possibility.  However,
632 < the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
633 < some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
634 < relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
635 < gains some weight.  The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
636 < distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) with both in
637 < a  vertical orientation is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
638 < nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
639 < nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO's to leave a purely vertical orientation
640 < also quickly drops the repulsion, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at $\sim$24 degrees between the 2 CO when the carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart.
641 < As mentioned above, the energy barrier for surface diffusion
642 < of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between CO can help
643 < increase the surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt was
644 < examined and while the majority of the CO is on or near the surface throughout
645 < the run, it is extremely mobile. This mobility suggests that the CO are more
646 < likely to shift their positions without necessarily dragging the Pt along with them.
629 > A different interpretation of the above mechanism which takes the
630 > large mobility of the CO into account, would be in the destabilization
631 > of Pt-Pt interactions due to bound CO.  Destabilizing Pt-Pt bonds at
632 > the edges could lead to increased step-edge breakup and diffusion. On
633 > the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach an edge atom
634 > is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
635 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain
636 > configurations, cases (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to
637 > $\sim$23~kcal/mol by the presence of bound CO molecules. In these
638 > instances, it becomes energetically favorable to roughen the edge by
639 > introducing a small separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening
640 > becomes immediately obvious in simulations with significant CO
641 > populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent on surfaces
642 > with lower CO coverage (and even on the bare surfaces), although in
643 > these cases it is likely due to random fluctuations that squeeze out
644 > step-edge atoms. Step-edge breakup by continuous single-atom
645 > translations (as suggested by these energy curves) is probably a
646 > worst-case scenario.  Multistep mechanisms in which an adatom moves
647 > laterally on the surface after being ejected would be more
648 > energetically favorable.  This would leave the adatom alongside the
649 > ledge, providing it with 5 nearest neighbors.  While fewer than the 7
650 > neighbors it had as part of the step-edge, it keeps more Pt neighbors
651 > than the 3 an isolated adatom would have on the terrace. In this
652 > proposed mechanism, the CO quadrupolar repulsion still plays a role in
653 > the initial roughening of the step-edge, but not in any long-term
654 > bonds with individual Pt atoms.  Higher CO coverages create more
655 > opportunities for the crowded CO configurations shown in Figure
656 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and this is likely to cause an increased
657 > propensity for step-edge breakup.
658  
659 < Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
660 < destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
661 < Pt atoms.  This would then have the effect of increasing surface mobility
662 < of these atoms.  To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
663 < CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
664 < around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. One representative
665 < configuration is displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}. Single or concerted movement
666 < of Pt atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
667 < the movement was forced along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
668 < from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
669 < are displayed in Table \ref{tab:energies}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
670 < locations can lead to lowered barriers for Pt breaking apart from the step-edge.
671 < Additionally, as highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
672 < burrowing and lifting of adatoms favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
568 < in terms of energetics.
659 > %Sketch graphic of different configurations
660 > \begin{figure}[H]
661 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{COpaths}
662 > \caption{Configurations used to investigate the mechanism of step-edge
663 >  breakup on Pt(557). In each case, the central (starred) atom is
664 >  pulled directly across the surface away from the step edge.  The Pt
665 >  atoms on the upper terrace are colored dark grey, while those on the
666 >  lower terrace are in white.  In each of these configurations, some
667 >  number of the atoms (highlighted in blue) had a CO molecule bound in
668 >  a vertical atop position.  The energies of these configurations as a
669 >  function of central atom displacement are displayed in Figure
670 >  \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
671 > \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
672 > \end{figure}
673  
674 + %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
675 + \begin{figure}[H]
676 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison}
677 + \caption{Energies for displacing a single edge atom perpendicular to
678 +  the step edge as a function of atomic displacement. Each of the
679 +  energy curves corresponds to one of the labeled configurations in
680 +  Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and are referenced to the
681 +  unperturbed step-edge.  Certain arrangements of bound CO (notably
682 +  configurations g and h) can lower the energetic barrier for creating
683 +  an adatom relative to the bare surface (configuration a).}
684 + \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
685 + \end{figure}
686 +
687 + While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase
688 + diffusion and the likelihood of edge wandering, this does not provide
689 + a complete explanation for the formation of double layers. If adatoms
690 + were constrained to their original terraces then doubling could not
691 + occur.  A mechanism for vertical displacement of adatoms at the
692 + step-edge is required to explain the doubling.
693 +
694 + We have discovered one possible mechanism for a CO-mediated vertical
695 + displacement of Pt atoms at the step edge. Figure \ref{fig:lambda}
696 + shows four points along a reaction coordinate in which a CO-bound
697 + adatom along the step-edge ``burrows'' into the edge and displaces the
698 + original edge atom onto the higher terrace. A number of events similar
699 + to this mechanism were observed during the simulations.  We predict an
700 + energetic barrier of 20~kcal/mol for this process (in which the
701 + displaced edge atom follows a curvilinear path into an adjacent 3-fold
702 + hollow site).  The barrier heights we obtain for this reaction
703 + coordinate are approximate because the exact path is unknown, but the
704 + calculated energy barriers would be easily accessible at operating
705 + conditions.  Additionally, this mechanism is exothermic, with a final
706 + energy 15~kcal/mol below the original $\lambda = 0$ configuration.
707 + When CO is not present and this reaction coordinate is followed, the
708 + process is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol.  The difference in the relative
709 + energies for the $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=1$ case when CO is present
710 + provides strong support for CO-mediated Pt-Pt interactions giving rise
711 + to the doubling reconstruction.
712 +
713   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
714   \begin{figure}[H]
715 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO.png}
716 < \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
717 < for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
718 < placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
719 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run. As shown
720 < in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord}, relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
721 < is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
579 < with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
715 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord}
716 > \caption{Points along a possible reaction coordinate for CO-mediated
717 >  edge doubling. Here, a CO-bound adatom burrows into an established
718 >  step edge and displaces an edge atom onto the upper terrace along a
719 >  curvilinear path.  The approximate barrier for the process is
720 >  20~kcal/mol, and the complete process is exothermic by 15~kcal/mol
721 >  in the presence of CO, but is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol without.}
722   \label{fig:lambda}
723   \end{figure}
724  
725 + The mechanism for doubling on the Pt(557) surface appears to require
726 + the cooperation of at least two distinct processes. For complete
727 + doubling of a layer to occur there must be a breakup of one
728 + terrace. These atoms must then ``disappear'' from that terrace, either
729 + by travelling to the terraces above of below their original levels.
730 + The presence of CO helps explain mechanisms for both of these
731 + situations. There must be sufficient breakage of the step-edge to
732 + increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and these adatoms
733 + must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above (or a comparable
734 + mechanism) to create the double layer.  With sufficient time, these
735 + mechanisms working in concert lead to the formation of a double layer.
736  
737 + \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
738 + Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system, it remained for
739 + the rest of the simulation time with minimal movement.  Random
740 + fluctuations that involved small clusters or divots were observed, but
741 + these features typically healed within a few nanoseconds.  Within our
742 + simulations, the formation of the double layer appeared to be
743 + irreversible and a double layer was never observed to split back into
744 + two single layer step-edges while CO was present.
745  
746 < \subsection{Diffusion}
747 < As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step-edge tends to be
748 < much larger than that perpendicular to the step-edge, likely because of the dynamic
749 < equilibrium that is established between the step-edge and adatom interface. The coverage
750 < of CO also appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
751 < The
752 < Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation
753 < of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it
754 < appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step-edge, will allow for
755 < a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on
756 < only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the
757 < more likely a growth point is to be formed.
758 < \\
746 > To further gauge the effect CO has on this surface, additional
747 > simulations were run starting from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt
748 > system that had already formed double layers. These simulations then
749 > had their CO forcibly removed.  The double layer broke apart rapidly
750 > in these simulations, showing a well-defined edge-splitting after
751 > 100~ps. Configurations of this system are shown in Figure
752 > \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring of the top and bottom layers helps to
753 > exhibit how much mixing the edges experience as they split. These
754 > systems were only examined for 10~ns, and within that time despite the
755 > initial rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few
756 > \AA~apart. It is possible that with longer simulation times, the (557)
757 > surface recovery observed by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} could
758 > also be recovered.
759  
599
760   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
761   \begin{figure}[H]
762 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
763 < %:
764 < \caption{(A)  0 ps, (B) 100 ps, (C) 1 ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
765 < helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
766 < and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
767 < there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
762 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking}
763 > \caption{Dynamics of an established (111) double step after removal of
764 >  the adsorbed CO: (A) 0~ps, (B) 100~ps, and (C) 1~ns after the removal
765 >  of CO. The presence of the CO helped maintain the stability of the
766 >  double step.  Nearly immediately after the CO is removed, the step
767 >  edge reforms in a (100) configuration, which is also the step type
768 >  seen on clean (557) surfaces. The step separation involves
769 >  significant mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
770   \label{fig:breaking}
771   \end{figure}
772  
773  
612
613
774   %Peaks!
775 < \begin{figure}[H]
776 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
777 < \caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
778 < of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
779 < aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
780 < \label{fig:peaks}
781 < \end{figure}
775 > %\begin{figure}[H]
776 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
777 > %\caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
778 > %of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
779 > %aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
780 > %\label{fig:peaks}
781 > %\end{figure}
782  
783  
784   %Don't think I need this
785   %clean surface...
786   %\begin{figure}[H]
787 < %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
787 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF}
788   %\caption{}
789  
790   %\end{figure}
# Line 632 | Line 792 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
792  
793  
794   \section{Conclusion}
795 < In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
795 > The strength and directionality of the Pt-CO binding interaction, as
796 > well as the large quadrupolar repulsion between atop-bound CO
797 > molecules, help to explain the observed increase in surface mobility
798 > of Pt(557) and the resultant reconstruction into a double-layer
799 > configuration at the highest simulated CO-coverages.  The weaker Au-CO
800 > interaction results in significantly lower adataom diffusion
801 > constants, less step-wandering, and a lack of the double layer
802 > reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
803  
804 + An in-depth examination of the energetics shows the important role CO
805 + plays in increasing step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal
806 + which are both necessary for double layer formation.
807 +
808   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
809  
810   %Table of Diffusion Constants
# Line 656 | Line 827 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
827   % \end{tabular}
828   % \end{table}
829  
830 < \section{Acknowledgments}
831 < Support for this project was provided by the National Science
832 < Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
833 < Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
834 < Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
835 <
830 > \begin{acknowledgement}
831 >  We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. William
832 >  F. Schneider and Dr. Feng Tao.  Support for this project was
833 >  provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243
834 >  and by the Center for Sustainable Energy at Notre Dame
835 >  (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
836 >  Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
837 > \end{acknowledgement}
838   \newpage
839   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
840 < \end{doublespace}
840 > %\end{doublespace}
841 >
842 > \begin{tocentry}
843 >
844 > \includegraphics[height=2.8cm]{TOC_doubleLayer}
845 >
846 > A reconstructed Pt(557) surface after having been exposed to a dosage of CO equivalent to half a monolayer of coverage.
847 >
848 > \end{tocentry}
849 >
850   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines