ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3872 by jmichalk, Mon Mar 11 22:37:32 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3873 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 12 21:33:15 2013 UTC

# Line 378 | Line 378 | phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal eq
378   Because of the difference in binding energies, nearly all of the CO was bound to the Pt surface, while
379   the Au surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
380   phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (over
381 < 5 ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
382 < data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40 ns in the
381 > 5~ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
382 > data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
383   data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
384   systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
385   source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
# Line 393 | Line 393 | metal system. The surfaces to which no CO was exposed
393   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
394   The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
395   to undergo remodeling that was not observed in the bare
396 < metal system. The surfaces to which no CO was exposed
397 < did experience minor roughening of the step-edge, but the
396 > metal system. The surfaces which were not exposed to CO
397 > did experience minor roughening of the step-edge because
398 > of the elevated temperatures, but the
399   (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
400   time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
401   roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
402   wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
403   similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
404   compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
405 < Pt system formed double layers at numerous spots upon its surface.
405 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
406 > formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
407 > similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
408  
409  
410   \subsubsection{Step wandering}
411 < The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed
412 < minimal movement at their respective run temperatures.
413 < As the coverage increased, the mobility of the surface
414 < also increased. Additionally, at the higher coverages
415 < on both metals, there was a large increase in the amount
416 < of observed step-wandering. Previous work by
417 < Williams\cite{Williams:1993} highlighted the entropic
418 < contribution to the repulsion felt between step-edges,
419 < and situations were that repulsion could be negated, or
420 < overcome, to allow for step coalescence or facet formation.
411 > The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
412 > movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
413 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
414 > adatoms and step-edges alike, also increased. Additionally,
415 > at the higher coverages on both metals, there was more
416 > step-wandering. Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
417 > did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead preferring
418 > to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in the
419 > original (557) lattice. Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
420 > highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
421 > when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
422 > repulsion exists because the entropy of the step-edges is constrained
423 > since step-edge crossing is not allowed. This entropic repulsion
424 > does not completely define the interactions between steps,
425 > which is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence,
426 > where additional attractive interactions can overcome the
427 > repulsion\cite{Williams:1991} and others will not. The presence
428 > of adsorbates can affect these step interactions, potentially
429 > leading to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
430  
431   \subsubsection{Double layers}
432   Tao et al. have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
433 < undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO
434 < adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010} The first involves a doubling of
435 < the step height and plateau length. Similar behavior has been
436 < seen to occur on numerous surfaces at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).
437 < \cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl} Of the two systems
438 < we examined, the Pt system showed a greater propensity for
439 < reconstruction when compared to the Au system. The amount
440 < of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
433 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
434 > The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
435 > Similar behavior has been seen to occur on numerous surfaces
436 > at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
437 > Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
438 > propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
439 > because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
440 > The amount of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
441   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
442 < effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the surface
443 < diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed step-edge
444 < wandering, only the Pt surface underwent the doubling seen by
445 < Tao et al. within the time scales studied here.  
446 < Only the 50\% coverage Pt system exhibited
447 < a complete doubling in the time scales we
448 < were able to monitor. Over longer periods (150~ns) two more double layers formed on this interface.
449 < Although double layer formation did not occur in the other Pt systems, they show
450 < more lateral movement of the step-edges
451 < compared to their Au counterparts. The 50\% Pt system is highlighted
440 < in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at various times along the simulation
441 < showing the evolution of a step-edge.
442 > effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
443 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
444 > step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
445 > doubling seen by Tao et al. within the time scales studied here.
446 > Over longer periods (150~ns) two more double layers formed
447 > on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
448 > in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
449 > general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
450 > 50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
451 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a step-edge.
452  
453   The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
454   Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
455   across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
456 < the 40~ns time scale, experienced this reconstruction.
456 > the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
457 > the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
458  
459   \subsection{Dynamics}
460   Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
# Line 451 | Line 462 | of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous work
462   \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
463   technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo gives an efficient
464   sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
465 < of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous work by Pearl and
466 < Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to show the coalescing
465 > of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
466 > Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
467   of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
468   $\sim$70 s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
469   the doubling to occur. In this section we give data on dynamic and
# Line 462 | Line 473 | arising from the individual movements, primarily throu
473   \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
474   %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
475   The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
476 < arising from the individual movements, primarily through surface
466 < diffusion, of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
476 > arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
477   displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
478   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
479 < be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges
480 < on higher-index surfaces provide a source for mobile metal atoms.
479 > be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
480 > on higher-index facets provide a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
481   Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
482   energetic penalty around $\sim$~40 kcal/mol, but this is significantly easier than lifting
483   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
484   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
485   on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, the penalty can fall as low as
486   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
487 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol) and these adatoms are
487 > diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are
488   able to explore the terrace before rejoining either the original step-edge or
489   becoming a part of a different edge. It is a more difficult process for an atom
490   to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
# Line 490 | Line 500 | movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on  a surface is s
500   between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
501   truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
502   was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
503 < movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on  a surface is strongly affected by
503 > movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
504   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
505   step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be different
506   from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
507   diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
508  
509 + The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data is likely due
510 + to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower
511 + coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
512 + then further limits the affects of the surface diffusion. The correlation
513 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
514 + definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
515 + explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
516 + the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
517 + stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms. By
518 + performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
519 + (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer,
520 + provides a $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ diffusion constant of $1.69~\pm~0.08$
521 + and a $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ diffusion constant of $6.30~\pm~0.08$.
522 + This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
523 + expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
524 + drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
525 + mechanism of double layer formation show the affect that CO on the
526 + surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
527 + coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
528 + thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
529 + arrangements of CO on the surface allowing the formation of a path,
530 + a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
531 + As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
532 + changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
533 + potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
534 + their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
535 +
536   \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
537   The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
538   CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
539   a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
540   has higher diffusion constants but did not show
541 < any signs of edge doubling. On the
542 < 50\%~Pt system, three separate layers were formed over
543 < 150~ns of simulation time. Previous experimental
541 > any signs of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
542 > 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time, while two more were formed as the system was run for an additional
543 > 110~ns (150~ns total). Previous experimental
544   work gives insight into the upper bounds of the
545   time required for step coalescence.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
546   In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
547   appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
548   into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
549 < formed the double layer and by 86 ns, the complete layer
549 > formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
550   has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
551   ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
552   appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
# Line 526 | Line 563 | take longer at lower temperatures.
563   \begin{figure}[H]
564   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
565   \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
566 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258 ps, (b) 19 ns, (c) 31.2 ns, and
567 <  (d) 86.1 ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
566 >  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
567 >  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
568    doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
569    touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
570    step observed in the later configurations.}
# Line 574 | Line 611 | From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the tim
611   This combination of growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of
612   dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges
613   meet as shown in Figure 1.B, this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
614 < From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35 ns.
614 > From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
615  
616   A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
617   CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
# Line 605 | Line 642 | are displayed in Table \ref{tab:energies}. These value
642   of Pt atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
643   the movement was forced along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
644   from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
645 < are displayed in Table \ref{tab:energies}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
645 > are displayed in Table \ref{tab:energies} with the corresponding beginning and ending reaction coordinates in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
646   locations can lead to lowered barriers for Pt breaking apart from the step-edge.
647   Additionally, as highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
648   burrowing and lifting of adatoms favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
# Line 613 | Line 650 | in terms of energetics.
650  
651   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
652   \begin{figure}[H]
653 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO.png}
653 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
654   \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
655   for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
656   placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
# Line 624 | Line 661 | in terms of energetics.
661   \label{fig:lambda}
662   \end{figure}
663  
664 + \begin{figure}[H]
665 + \includegraphics[totalheight=0.9\textheight]{lambdaTable.png}
666 + \caption{}
667 + \label{fig:lambdaTable}
668 + \end{figure}
669  
670  
671   \subsection{Diffusion}
# Line 644 | Line 686 | more likely a growth point is to be formed.
686   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
687   \begin{figure}[H]
688   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
689 < %:
648 < \caption{(A)  0 ps, (B) 100 ps, (C) 1 ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
689 > \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
690   helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
691   and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
692   there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines