ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3873 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 12 21:33:15 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3877 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 15 13:18:17 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 >
24 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
25 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
26   \usepackage{url}
27   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
28   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
# Line 22 | Line 32
32   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
33   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
34   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
35 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
36  
37 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
38 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
37 > %\citestyle{nature}
38 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
39  
40 < \begin{document}
40 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
41 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
42  
43 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
44 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
45 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
46 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
47 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
48 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
49 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
50  
51 + \keywords{}
52 +
53 + \begin{document}
54 +
55 +
56   %%
57   %Introduction
58   %       Experimental observations
# Line 46 | Line 70
70   %       Causes of 2_layer reordering in Pt
71   %Summary
72   %%
49
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
53
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Mar 5, 2013}
62
63 %authors
73  
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
74  
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
75   \begin{abstract}
76   We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
77   various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
# Line 156 | Line 161 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was mod
161   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
162   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
163   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
164 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was modeled using a rigid
164 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{EAM} The CO was modeled using a rigid
165   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
166   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
167   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 300 | Line 305 | zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxe
305   performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
306   was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
307   were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
308 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
308 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
309   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
310   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
311   empirical force field.
# Line 346 | Line 351 | future work.
351    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
352    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
353   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
354 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
354 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
355    \hline
356   \end{tabular}
357   \label{tab:co_energies}
# Line 364 | Line 369 | The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
369   1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
370   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
371  
372 < The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
373 < and 2045~K for Pt) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
372 > The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
373 > and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
374   different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
375   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
376   respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
# Line 392 | Line 397 | to undergo remodeling that was not observed in the bar
397   \section{Results}
398   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
399   The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
400 < to undergo remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 < metal system. The surfaces which were not exposed to CO
402 < did experience minor roughening of the step-edge because
400 > to undergo extensive remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 > systems. The bare metal surfaces
402 > experienced minor roughening of the step-edge because
403   of the elevated temperatures, but the
404   (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
405   time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
# Line 411 | Line 416 | adatoms and step-edges alike, also increased. Addition
416   The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417   movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
418   coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
419 < adatoms and step-edges alike, also increased. Additionally,
420 < at the higher coverages on both metals, there was more
421 < step-wandering. Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
422 < did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead preferring
423 < to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in the
424 < original (557) lattice. Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
419 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
421 > did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead
422 > preferring to keep nearly the same distance between steps
423 > as in the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA for Pt and $\sim$14\AA for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425   highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426   when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 < repulsion exists because the entropy of the step-edges is constrained
428 < since step-edge crossing is not allowed. This entropic repulsion
429 < does not completely define the interactions between steps,
430 < which is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence,
431 < where additional attractive interactions can overcome the
432 < repulsion\cite{Williams:1991} and others will not. The presence
433 < of adsorbates can affect these step interactions, potentially
434 < leading to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
427 > repulsion arises because step-edge crossing is not allowed
428 > which constrains the entropy. This entropic repulsion does
429 > not completely define the interactions between steps, which
430 > is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence, where
431 > additional attractive interactions can overcome the repulsion.\cite{Williams:1991}
432 > The presence and concentration of adsorbates, as shown in
433 > this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially leading
434 > to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
435  
436   \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 < Tao et al. have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
437 > Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438   undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
439   The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 < Similar behavior has been seen to occur on numerous surfaces
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on numerous surfaces
441   at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442   Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443   propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
444   because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
445 < The amount of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
445 > The amount of reconstruction is strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447   effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448   surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
449   step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
450 < doubling seen by Tao et al. within the time scales studied here.
451 < Over longer periods (150~ns) two more double layers formed
450 > doubling seen by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
451 > Over longer periods, (150~ns) two more double layers formed
452   on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
453   in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454   general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
455   50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
456 < various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a step-edge.
456 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
457  
458   The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
459   Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
# Line 456 | Line 461 | the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
461   the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
462   the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
463  
464 + %Evolution of surface
465 + \begin{figure}[H]
466 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
467 + \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
468 +  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
469 +  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
470 +  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
471 +  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
472 +  step observed in the later configurations.}
473 +  \label{fig:reconstruct}
474 + \end{figure}
475 +
476   \subsection{Dynamics}
477   Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
478 < with the energetics and structures at different conditions
479 < \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
480 < technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo gives an efficient
478 > with the energetics and structures at different conditions.
479 > \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} Consequently, the most common
480 > technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo approaches give an efficient
481   sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
482   of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
483   Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
484   of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
485 < $\sim$70 s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 < the doubling to occur. In this section we give data on dynamic and
485 > $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 > the doubling to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we were able to probe the dynamics of these reconstructions and in this section we give data on dynamic and
487   transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
488  
489  
# Line 477 | Line 494 | on higher-index facets provide a lower energy source f
494   displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
495   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
496   be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
497 < on higher-index facets provide a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
497 > on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
498   Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
499 < energetic penalty around $\sim$~40 kcal/mol, but this is significantly easier than lifting
499 > energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
500   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
501   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
502 < on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, the penalty can fall as low as
502 > on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Figures \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} and \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}, the penalty can fall to as low as
503   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
504 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are
505 < able to explore the terrace before rejoining either the original step-edge or
506 < becoming a part of a different edge. It is a more difficult process for an atom
504 > diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
505 > able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
506 > becoming a part of a different edge. It is a difficult process for an atom
507   to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
508 < energy barrier required to lift or lower the adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
508 > energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
509   metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
510   diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
511   observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
# Line 502 | Line 519 | step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-e
519   was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
520   movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
521   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
522 < step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be different
523 < from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
522 > step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
523 > the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
524   diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
525  
526 < The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data is likely due
527 < to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower
526 > %Diffusion graph
527 > \begin{figure}[H]
528 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
529 > \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
530 >  parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
531 >  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
532 >  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
533 >  than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
534 >  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
535 >  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
536 >  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
537 >  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
538 >  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
539 > \label{fig:diff}
540 > \end{figure}
541 >
542 > The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data in Figure \ref{fig:diff} is likely due
543 > to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower observed
544   coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
545 < then further limits the affects of the surface diffusion. The correlation
545 > then further limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
546   between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
547   definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
548   explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
549   the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
550 < stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms. By
551 < performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
552 < (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer,
553 < provides a $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ diffusion constant of $1.69~\pm~0.08$
554 < and a $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ diffusion constant of $6.30~\pm~0.08$.
550 > stability strongly and many atoms that had been tracked for mobility
551 > data have now been buried. By performing the same diffusion
552 > calculation but on a shorter run time (20~ns), only including data
553 > before the formation of the first double layer, we obtain the larger
554 > values for both $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$
555 > at the 50\% coverage as seen in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
556   This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
557   expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
558   drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
559 < mechanism of double layer formation show the affect that CO on the
559 > mechanism of double layer formation focuses on the effect that CO on the
560   surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
561   coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
562   thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
563 < arrangements of CO on the surface allowing the formation of a path,
563 > arrangements of CO on the surface allowing for the formation of a path,
564   a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
565   As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
566   changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
567   potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
568   their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
569  
570 +
571 +
572   \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
573 < The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
574 < CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
575 < a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
576 < has higher diffusion constants but did not show
577 < any signs of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
578 < 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time, while two more were formed as the system was run for an additional
579 < 110~ns (150~ns total). Previous experimental
580 < work gives insight into the upper bounds of the
581 < time required for step coalescence.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
573 > The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages
574 > plays a primary role in double layer formation. However,
575 > this is not a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
576 > has higher diffusion constants but did not show any signs
577 > of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
578 > 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns
579 > of simulation time, while two more were formed as the
580 > system was allowed to run for an additional
581 > 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction is
582 > a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound
583 > will be lowered as experimental techniques continue to improve.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
584   In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
585   appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
586   into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
# Line 552 | Line 590 | The other two layers in this simulation formed over pe
590   appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
591   $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
592   The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
593 < 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper
556 < bounds of the image scan, it is likely that most aspects of this
557 < reconstruction occur very rapidly. A possible explanation
593 > 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. A possible explanation
594   for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
595   under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
596 < take longer at lower temperatures.
596 > take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally, our measured times for completion
597 > of the doubling after the appearance of a nucleation site are likely affected by our
598 > constrained axes. A longer step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''. However,
599 > the first appearance of a nucleation site will likely occur more quickly due to its stochastic nature.
600  
601 < %Evolution of surface
601 >
602 >
603 >
604 >
605 >
606 > %Sketch graphic of different configurations
607   \begin{figure}[H]
608 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
609 < \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
610 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
611 <  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
612 <  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
613 <  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
614 <  step observed in the later configurations.}
571 <  \label{fig:reconstruct}
608 > \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
609 > \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
610 > the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
611 > upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
612 > complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
613 > Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
614 > \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
615   \end{figure}
616  
617 + %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
618   \begin{figure}[H]
619 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
620 < \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
621 <  parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
622 <  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
623 <  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
624 <  than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
625 <  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
626 <  completely breaking away. Additionally, the observed
627 <  maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
584 <  CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
585 <  movement of the Pt atoms around and across the surface. }
586 < \label{fig:diff}
619 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
620 > \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
621 > surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
622 > to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
623 > same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
624 > the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
625 > However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
626 > configurations of CO will be more likely. }
627 > \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
628   \end{figure}
629  
589
590
591
630   %Discussion
631   \section{Discussion}
632   We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
633   Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
634   were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
635  
636 + \subsection{Diffusion}
637 + As shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}, for the Pt systems, there
638 + is a strong trend toward higher diffusion constants as
639 + surface coverage of CO increases. The drop for the 50\%
640 + case being explained as double layer formation already
641 + beginning to occur in the analyzed 40~ns, which lowered
642 + the calculated diffusion rates. Between the parallel and
643 + perpendicular rates, the perpendicular diffusion constant
644 + appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
645 + formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
646 + formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
647 + site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
648 + the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective repulsion.
649 + This repulsion must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
650 + A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
651 + and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
652 + to form the nucleation point. Upon that appearance, parallel
653 + diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up the double
654 + layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
655 + the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
656 + appearance of said site was unpredictable.
657 +
658   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
659 < Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
660 < our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
661 < which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
662 < Similarities of our results to those reported previously by
663 < Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} are quite
664 < strong. The simulated Pt
665 < system exposed to a large dosage of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace
666 < widths and step heights. The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a time, but is rapid on experimental timescales.
667 < The adatoms either
668 < break away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift
669 < up onto a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace
670 < until reaching another step-edge or rejoining their original edge.  
671 < This combination of growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of
672 < dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges
673 < meet as shown in Figure 1.B, this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
674 < From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
659 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
660 > our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
661 > which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
662 > Similarities of our results to those reported previously by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
663 > are quite strong. The simulated Pt system exposed to a large dosage
664 > of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace widths and step heights.
665 > The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a
666 > time, but is rapid on experimental timescales. The adatoms either break
667 > away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift up onto
668 > a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace until reaching
669 > another step-edge or rejoining their original edge. This combination of
670 > growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
671 > However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in Figure 1.B,
672 > this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
673 > From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the
674 > initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
675  
676   A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
677   CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
# Line 619 | Line 679 | gains some credence.  The energetic repulsion between
679   the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
680   some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
681   relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
682 < gains some credence.  The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
682 > gains some credence. The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
683   distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
684 < a  vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
684 > a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
685   nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
686 < nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO's to leave a purely vertical orientation
687 < also quickly drops the repulsion, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at $\sim$24 degrees between the 2 CO when the carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart.
688 < As mentioned above, the energy barrier for surface diffusion
689 < of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between neighboring CO molecules can
690 < increase the surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt was
691 < examined and while the majority of the CO is on or near the surface throughout
692 < the run, most molecules are mobile. This mobility suggests that the CO are more
693 < likely to shift their positions without necessarily the Pt along with them.
686 > nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical orientation
687 > also lowers the repulsion. A minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at when the
688 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}, when the carbons are
689 > locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart. As mentioned above, the energy barrier
690 > for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between
691 > neighboring CO molecules can increase the surface diffusion. However, the
692 > residence time of CO on Pt was examined and while the majority of the CO is
693 > on or near the surface throughout the run, the molecules are extremely mobile,
694 > with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times larger, depending on coverage. This
695 > mobility suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without
696 > necessarily the Pt along with them.
697  
698   Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
699   destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
700 < Pt atoms.  This would then have the effect of increasing surface mobility
638 < of these atoms.  To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
700 > Pt atoms. To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
701   CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
702 < around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. One representative
703 < configuration is displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}. Single or concerted movement
704 < of Pt atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
705 < the movement was forced along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
706 < from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
707 < are displayed in Table \ref{tab:energies} with the corresponding beginning and ending reaction coordinates in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
708 < locations can lead to lowered barriers for Pt breaking apart from the step-edge.
709 < Additionally, as highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
710 < burrowing and lifting of adatoms favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
711 < in terms of energetics.
702 > around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. A few sample
703 > configurations are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, with
704 > energies at various positions along the path displayed in Table
705 > NO TABLE. Certain configurations of CO, cases B and D for
706 > example, can have quite strong energetic reasons for breaking
707 > away from the step-edge. Although the packing of these configurations
708 > is unlikely until CO coverage has reached a high enough value.
709 > These examples are showing the most difficult cases, immediate
710 > adatom formation through breakage away from the step-edge, which
711 > is why their energies at large distances are relatively high. There are
712 > mechanistic paths where an edge atom could get shifted to onto the
713 > step-edge to form a small peak before fully breaking away. And again,
714 > once the adatom is formed, the barrier for diffusion on the surface is
715 > negligible. These sample configurations help explain CO's effect on
716 > general surface mobility and step wandering, but they are lacking in
717 > providing a mechanism for the formation of double layers. One possible
718 > mechanism is elucidated in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, where a burrowing
719 > and lifting process of an adatom and step-edge atom respectively is
720 > examined. The system, without CO present, is nearly energetically
721 > neutral, whereas with CO present there is a $\sim$ 15 kcal/mol drop
722 > in the energy of the system.
723  
724   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
725   \begin{figure}[H]
# Line 654 | Line 727 | in terms of energetics.
727   \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
728   for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
729   placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
730 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run. As shown
658 < in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord}, relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
730 > The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
731   is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
732   with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
733   \label{fig:lambda}
734   \end{figure}
735  
664 \begin{figure}[H]
665 \includegraphics[totalheight=0.9\textheight]{lambdaTable.png}
666 \caption{}
667 \label{fig:lambdaTable}
668 \end{figure}
736  
737  
671 \subsection{Diffusion}
672 The diffusion parallel to the step-edge tends to be
673 much larger than that perpendicular to the step-edge. The dynamic
674 equilibrium that is established between the step-edge and adatom interface. The coverage
675 of CO also appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
676 The
677 Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation
678 of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it
679 appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step-edge, will allow for
680 a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on
681 only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the
682 more likely a growth point is to be formed.
683 \\
738  
739  
740   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
# Line 741 | Line 795 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
795   % \end{tabular}
796   % \end{table}
797  
798 < \section{Acknowledgments}
798 > \begin{acknowledgement}
799   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
800   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
801   Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
802   Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
803 <
803 > \end{acknowledgement}
804   \newpage
805   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
806 < \end{doublespace}
806 > %\end{doublespace}
807 >
808 > \begin{tocentry}
809 > %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
810 > \end{tocentry}
811 >
812   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines