ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3874 by jmichalk, Wed Mar 13 14:57:09 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3876 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 15 12:51:01 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 >
24 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
25 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
26   \usepackage{url}
27   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
28   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
# Line 22 | Line 32
32   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
33   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
34   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
35 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
36  
37 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
38 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
37 > %\citestyle{nature}
38 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
39  
40 < \begin{document}
40 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
41 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
42  
43 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
44 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
45 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
46 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
47 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
48 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
49 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
50  
51 + \keywords{}
52 +
53 + \begin{document}
54 +
55 +
56   %%
57   %Introduction
58   %       Experimental observations
# Line 47 | Line 71
71   %Summary
72   %%
73  
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
74  
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Mar 5, 2013}
62
63 %authors
64
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
67
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
75   \begin{abstract}
76   We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
77   various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
# Line 300 | Line 305 | zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxe
305   performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
306   was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
307   were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
308 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
308 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
309   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
310   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
311   empirical force field.
# Line 346 | Line 351 | future work.
351    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
352    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
353   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
354 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
354 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
355    \hline
356   \end{tabular}
357   \label{tab:co_energies}
# Line 364 | Line 369 | The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
369   1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
370   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
371  
372 < The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
373 < and 2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
372 > The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
373 > and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
374   different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
375   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
376   respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
# Line 392 | Line 397 | to undergo remodeling that was not observed in the bar
397   \section{Results}
398   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
399   The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
400 < to undergo remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 < metal system. The surfaces which were not exposed to CO
402 < did experience minor roughening of the step-edge because
400 > to undergo extensive remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 > systems. The bare metal surfaces
402 > experienced minor roughening of the step-edge because
403   of the elevated temperatures, but the
404   (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
405   time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
# Line 411 | Line 416 | adatoms and step-edges alike, also increased. Addition
416   The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417   movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
418   coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
419 < adatoms and step-edges alike, also increased. Additionally,
420 < at the higher coverages on both metals, there was more
421 < step-wandering. Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
422 < did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead preferring
423 < to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in the
424 < original (557) lattice. Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
419 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
421 > did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead
422 > preferring to keep nearly the same distance between steps
423 > as in the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA for Pt and $\sim$14\AA for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425   highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426   when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 < repulsion arises because the entropy of the step-edges is constrained,
428 < since step-edge crossing is not allowed. This entropic repulsion
429 < does not completely define the interactions between steps,
430 < which is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence,
431 < where additional attractive interactions can overcome the
432 < repulsion\cite{Williams:1991} and others will not. The presence and concentration
433 < of adsorbates, as shown in this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially
434 < leading to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
427 > repulsion arises because step-edge crossing is not allowed
428 > which constrains the entropy. This entropic repulsion does
429 > not completely define the interactions between steps, which
430 > is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence, where
431 > additional attractive interactions can overcome the repulsion.\cite{Williams:1991}
432 > The presence and concentration of adsorbates, as shown in
433 > this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially leading
434 > to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
435  
436   \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 < Tao et al. have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
437 > Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438   undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
439   The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 < Similar behavior has been seen to occur on numerous surfaces
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on numerous surfaces
441   at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442   Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443   propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
444   because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
445 < The amount of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
445 > The amount of reconstruction is strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447   effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448   surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
# Line 448 | Line 453 | various times along the simulation showing the evoluti
453   in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454   general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
455   50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
456 < various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a step-edge.
456 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
457  
458   The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
459   Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
# Line 456 | Line 461 | the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
461   the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
462   the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
463  
464 + %Evolution of surface
465 + \begin{figure}[H]
466 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
467 + \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
468 +  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
469 +  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
470 +  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
471 +  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
472 +  step observed in the later configurations.}
473 +  \label{fig:reconstruct}
474 + \end{figure}
475 +
476   \subsection{Dynamics}
477   Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
478   with the energetics and structures at different conditions
479   \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
480 < technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo gives an efficient
480 > technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo approaches give an efficient
481   sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
482   of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
483   Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
484   of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
485   $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 < the doubling to occur. In this section we give data on dynamic and
486 > the doubling to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we were able to probe the dynamics of these reconstructions and in this section we give data on dynamic and
487   transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
488  
489  
# Line 477 | Line 494 | on higher-index facets provide a lower energy source f
494   displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
495   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
496   be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
497 < on higher-index facets provide a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
497 > on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
498   Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
499 < energetic penalty around $\sim$~40 kcal/mol, but this is significantly easier than lifting
499 > energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
500   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
501   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
502 < on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, the penalty can fall as low as
502 > on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Figures \ref{fig:sketchGraphic} and \ref{fig:sketchEnergies}, the penalty can fall to as low as
503   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
504 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are
505 < able to explore the terrace before rejoining either the original step-edge or
506 < becoming a part of a different edge. It is a more difficult process for an atom
504 > diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
505 > able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
506 > becoming a part of a different edge. It is a difficult process for an atom
507   to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
508 < energy barrier required to lift or lower the adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
508 > energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
509   metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
510   diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
511   observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
# Line 502 | Line 519 | step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-e
519   was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
520   movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
521   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
522 < step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be different
523 < from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
522 > step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
523 > the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
524   diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
525  
526 < The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data is likely due
527 < to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower
526 > %Diffusion graph
527 > \begin{figure}[H]
528 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
529 > \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
530 >  parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
531 >  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
532 >  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
533 >  than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
534 >  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
535 >  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
536 >  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
537 >  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
538 >  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
539 > \label{fig:diff}
540 > \end{figure}
541 >
542 > The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data in Figure \ref{fig:diff} is likely due
543 > to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower observed
544   coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
545 < then further limits the affects of the surface diffusion. The correlation
545 > then further limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
546   between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
547   definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
548   explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
549   the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
550 < stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms. By
550 > stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms and so
551 > atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have now been buried. By
552   performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
553 < (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer,
554 < provides a $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ diffusion constant of $1.69~\pm~0.08$
521 < and a $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ diffusion constant of $6.30~\pm~0.08$.
553 > (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer, we obtain
554 > the larger values for both $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ at the 50\% coverage.
555   This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
556   expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
557   drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
558 < mechanism of double layer formation show the affect that CO on the
558 > mechanism of double layer formation focuses on the effect that CO on the
559   surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
560   coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
561   thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
# Line 533 | Line 566 | their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
566   potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
567   their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
568  
569 +
570 +
571   \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
572   The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
573   CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
# Line 559 | Line 594 | take longer at lower temperatures.
594   under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
595   take longer at lower temperatures.
596  
597 < %Evolution of surface
597 >
598 >
599 >
600 >
601 >
602 > %Sketch graphic of different configurations
603   \begin{figure}[H]
604 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
605 < \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
606 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
607 <  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
608 <  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
609 <  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
610 <  step observed in the later configurations.}
571 <  \label{fig:reconstruct}
604 > \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
605 > \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
606 > the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
607 > upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
608 > complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
609 > Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
610 > \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
611   \end{figure}
612  
613 + %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
614   \begin{figure}[H]
615 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
616 < \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
617 <  parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
618 <  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
619 <  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
620 <  than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
621 <  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
622 <  completely breaking away. Additionally, the observed
623 <  maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
584 <  CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
585 <  movement of the Pt atoms around and across the surface. }
586 < \label{fig:diff}
615 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
616 > \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
617 > surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
618 > to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
619 > same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
620 > the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
621 > However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
622 > configurations of CO will be more likely. }
623 > \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
624   \end{figure}
625  
589
590
591
626   %Discussion
627   \section{Discussion}
628   We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
629   Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
630   were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
631  
632 + \subsection{Diffusion}
633 + As shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}, for the Pt systems, there
634 + is a strong trend toward higher diffusion constants as
635 + surface coverage of CO increases. The drop for the 50\%
636 + case being explained as double layer formation already
637 + beginning to occur in the analyzed 40~ns, which lowered
638 + the calculated diffusion rates. Between the parallel and
639 + perpendicular rates, the perpendicular diffusion constant
640 + appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
641 + formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
642 + formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
643 + site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
644 + the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective repulsion.
645 + This repulsion must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
646 + A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
647 + and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
648 + to form the nucleation point. Upon that appearance, parallel
649 + diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up the double
650 + layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
651 + the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
652 + appearance of said site was unpredictable.
653 +
654   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
655 < Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
656 < our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
657 < which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
658 < Similarities of our results to those reported previously by
659 < Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} are quite
660 < strong. The simulated Pt
661 < system exposed to a large dosage of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace
662 < widths and step heights. The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a time, but is rapid on experimental timescales.
663 < The adatoms either
664 < break away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift
665 < up onto a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace
666 < until reaching another step-edge or rejoining their original edge.  
667 < This combination of growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of
668 < dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges
669 < meet as shown in Figure 1.B, this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
670 < From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
655 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
656 > our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
657 > which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
658 > Similarities of our results to those reported previously by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
659 > are quite strong. The simulated Pt system exposed to a large dosage
660 > of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace widths and step heights.
661 > The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a
662 > time, but is rapid on experimental timescales. The adatoms either break
663 > away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift up onto
664 > a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace until reaching
665 > another step-edge or rejoining their original edge. This combination of
666 > growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
667 > However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in Figure 1.B,
668 > this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
669 > From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the
670 > initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
671  
672   A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
673   CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
# Line 619 | Line 675 | gains some credence.  The energetic repulsion between
675   the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
676   some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
677   relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
678 < gains some credence.  The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
678 > gains some credence. The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
679   distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
680 < a  vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
680 > a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
681   nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
682 < nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO's to leave a purely vertical orientation
683 < also quickly drops the repulsion, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at $\sim$24 degrees between the 2 CO when the carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart.
684 < As mentioned above, the energy barrier for surface diffusion
685 < of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between neighboring CO molecules can
686 < increase the surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt was
687 < examined and while the majority of the CO is on or near the surface throughout
688 < the run, most molecules are mobile. This mobility suggests that the CO are more
689 < likely to shift their positions without necessarily the Pt along with them.
682 > nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical orientation
683 > also lowers the repulsion. A minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at when the
684 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}, when the carbons are
685 > locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart. As mentioned above, the energy barrier
686 > for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between
687 > neighboring CO molecules can increase the surface diffusion. However, the
688 > residence time of CO on Pt was examined and while the majority of the CO is
689 > on or near the surface throughout the run, the molecules are extremely mobile,
690 > with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times larger, depending on coverage. This
691 > mobility suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without
692 > necessarily the Pt along with them.
693  
694   Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
695   destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
696 < Pt atoms.  This would then have the effect of increasing surface mobility
638 < of these atoms.  To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
696 > Pt atoms. To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
697   CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
698 < around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. One representative
699 < configuration is displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}. Single or concerted movement
700 < of Pt atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
701 < the movement was forced along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
702 < from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
703 < are displayed in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord} with the corresponding beginning and ending reaction coordinates in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
704 < locations can lead to lowered barriers for Pt breaking apart from the step-edge.
705 < Additionally, as highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
706 < burrowing and lifting of adatoms favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
707 < in terms of energetics.
698 > around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. A few sample
699 > configurations are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}, with
700 > energies at various positions along the path displayed in Table
701 > \ref{tab:rxcoord}. Certain configurations of CO, cases B and D for
702 > example, can have quite strong energetic reasons for breaking
703 > away from the step-edge. Although the packing of these configurations
704 > is unlikely until CO coverage has reached a high enough value.
705 > These examples are showing the most difficult cases, immediate
706 > adatom formation through breakage away from the step-edge, which
707 > is why their energies at large distances are relatively high. There are
708 > mechanistic paths where an edge atom could get shifted to onto the
709 > step-edge to form a small peak before fully breaking away. And again,
710 > once the adatom is formed, the barrier for diffusion on the surface is
711 > negligible. These sample configurations help explain CO's effect on
712 > general surface mobility and step wandering, but they are lacking in
713 > providing a mechanism for the formation of double layers. One possible
714 > mechanism is elucidated in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, where a burrowing
715 > and lifting process of an adatom and step-edge atom respectively is
716 > examined. The system, without CO present, is nearly energetically
717 > neutral, whereas with CO present there is a $\sim$ 15 kcal/mol drop
718 > in the energy of the system.
719  
720   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
721   \begin{figure}[H]
# Line 654 | Line 723 | in terms of energetics.
723   \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
724   for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
725   placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
726 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run. As shown
658 < in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord}, relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
726 > The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
727   is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
728   with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
729   \label{fig:lambda}
730   \end{figure}
731  
664 \begin{figure}[H]
665 \includegraphics[totalheight=0.9\textheight]{lambdaTable.png}
666 \caption{}
667 \label{fig:lambdaTable}
668 \end{figure}
732  
733  
734  
672 \begin{table}[H]
673 \caption{}
674 \centering
675 \begin{tabular}{| c || c | c | c | c |}
676 \hline
677 \textbf{System} & 0.5~\AA & 2~\AA & 4~\AA & 6~\AA \\
678 \hline
679 A & 6.38 & 38.34 & 44.65 & 47.60 \\
680 B & -20.72 & 0.67 & 17.33 & 24.28 \\
681 C & 4.92 & 27.02 & 41.05 & 47.43 \\
682 D & -16.97 & 21.21 & 35.87 & 40.93 \\
683 E & 5.92 & 30.96 & 43.69 & 49.23 \\
684 F & 8.53 & 46.23 & 53.98 & 65.55 \\
685 \hline
686 \end{tabular}
687 \label{tab:rxcoord}
688 \end{table}
735  
690
691 \subsection{Diffusion}
692 The diffusion parallel to the step-edge tends to be
693 much larger than that perpendicular to the step-edge. The dynamic
694 equilibrium that is established between the step-edge and adatom interface. The coverage
695 of CO also appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
696 The
697 Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation
698 of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it
699 appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step-edge, will allow for
700 a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on
701 only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the
702 more likely a growth point is to be formed.
703 \\
704
705
736   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
737   \begin{figure}[H]
738   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
# Line 761 | Line 791 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
791   % \end{tabular}
792   % \end{table}
793  
794 < \section{Acknowledgments}
794 > \begin{acknowledgement}
795   Support for this project was provided by the National Science
796   Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
797   Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
798   Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
799 <
799 > \end{acknowledgement}
800   \newpage
801   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
802 < \end{doublespace}
802 > %\end{doublespace}
803 >
804 > \begin{tocentry}
805 > %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
806 > \end{tocentry}
807 >
808   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines