ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3876 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 15 12:51:01 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3882 by gezelter, Tue Mar 19 20:36:34 2013 UTC

# Line 20 | Line 20
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22   \usepackage{multicol}
23 + \mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
24 + %\usepackage{epstopdf}
25  
26   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
27   % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
28   \usepackage{url}
29   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
30   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
31 < 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
31 > 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=1110000
32  
33   % double space list of tables and figures
34   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
# Line 73 | Line 75 | We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) u
75  
76  
77   \begin{abstract}
78 < We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
79 < various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
80 < explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
81 < and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
82 < as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
83 < this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
84 < strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
85 < role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
86 < small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
87 < was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
88 < is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
89 < systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
88 <
78 >  The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557) and
79 >  Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO) were
80 >  investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
81 >  interactions were parameterized from experimental data and
82 >  plane-wave Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large
83 >  difference in binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions
84 >  was found to play a significant role in step-edge stability and
85 >  adatom diffusion constants.  Various mechanisms for CO-mediated step
86 >  wandering and step doubling were investigated on the Pt(557)
87 >  surface.  We find that the energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
88 >  can explain the step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and
89 >  the lack of such a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
90   \end{abstract}
91  
92   \newpage
# Line 117 | Line 118 | This work is an investigation into the mechanism and t
118   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
119   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
120  
121 < This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for
121 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for the Pt(557) \& Au(557)
122   surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
123   of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
124   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
# Line 126 | Line 127 | The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction w
127   catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
128   to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
129   to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
130 < The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
131 < likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
132 < and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
133 < reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxation to the
130 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is less
131 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters {\it et al}.\cite{Peters:2000}
132 > and Piccolo {\it et al}.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
133 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters {\it et al}. saw a relaxation to the
134   22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
135 < become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
135 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction, while
136   allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
137 < configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern being greatly
138 < affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
137 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern on Au(111) being greatly
138 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo {\it et al}. on the other hand, did see a
139   disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
140   surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
141   low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
# Line 149 | Line 150 | adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite l
150   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
151   model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
152   adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
153 < 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
153 > 10$^4$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
154   molecular dynamics
155   (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
156   methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
# Line 161 | Line 162 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was mod
162   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
163   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
164   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
165 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was modeled using a rigid
165 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{Foiles86} The CO was modeled using a rigid
166   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
167   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
168   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 174 | Line 175 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is
175   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
176   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
177   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
178 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is among the
179 < fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
180 < all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
178 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88} is among the
179 > fastest of these density functional approaches. In
180 > all of these models, atoms are treated as a positively charged
181   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
182   calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
183   the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
# Line 213 | Line 214 | from the original parameterization, where the interact
214   propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
215   dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
216   is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
217 < from the original parameterization, where the interactions
218 < up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
219 < Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
217 > because interactions
218 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account in the parameterization.\cite{Voter95a}
219 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88}
220   which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
221   interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
222   the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
223 < surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
223 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAM's functional
224   treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
225   theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
226   \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
# Line 272 | Line 273 | et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit t
273   position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
274   The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
275   than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
276 < et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
277 < Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
276 > {\it et al}.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
277 > Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged, partial
278   binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
279   Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
280   equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
281 < over O as the surface-binding atom. In most cases, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
281 > over O as the surface-binding atom. In most geometries, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
282   repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
283   surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
284   (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
# Line 314 | Line 315 | and polarization are neglected in this model, although
315   The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
316   are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
317   (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
318 < and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
319 < affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
319 < future work.
318 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects could have
319 > an effect on  binding energies and binding site preferences.
320  
321   %Table  of Parameters
322   %Pt Parameter Set 9
# Line 360 | Line 360 | dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
360   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
361   Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
362   54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
363 < dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
363 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA. The metal slabs
364 > are 9 and 8 atoms deep respectively, corresponding to a slab
365 > thickness of $\sim$21~\AA~ for Pt and $\sim$19~\AA~for Au.
366   The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
367   along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
368   {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
# Line 369 | Line 371 | The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10
371   1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
372   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
373  
374 < The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
374 > The different bulk melting temperatures predicted by EAM (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
375   and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
376   different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
377   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
# Line 387 | Line 389 | source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,
389   data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
390   data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
391   systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
392 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
392 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,openmd}
393  
394  
395  
# Line 396 | Line 398 | The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
398   %
399   \section{Results}
400   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
401 < The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
402 < to undergo extensive remodeling that was not observed in the bare
403 < systems. The bare metal surfaces
404 < experienced minor roughening of the step-edge because
405 < of the elevated temperatures, but the
406 < (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
407 < time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
408 < roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
409 < wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
410 < similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
411 < compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
410 < Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
411 < formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
412 < similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
401 > The bare metal surfaces experienced minor roughening of the
402 > step-edge because of the elevated temperatures, but the (557)
403 > face was stable throughout the simulations. The surface of both
404 > systems, upon dosage of CO, began to undergo extensive remodeling
405 > that was not observed in the bare systems. Reconstructions of
406 > the Au systems were limited to breakup of the step-edges and
407 > some step wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
408 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent. The 50\% coverage
409 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it formed
410 > well-defined and stable double layers through step coalescence,
411 > similar to results reported by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}
412  
413  
414   \subsubsection{Step wandering}
415   The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
416 < movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
417 < coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
416 > step-wandering at their respective temperatures. As the CO
417 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface atoms,
418   described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
419 < also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
420 < did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead
421 < preferring to keep nearly the same distance between steps
422 < as in the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA for Pt and $\sim$14\AA for Au.
423 < Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
419 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system where step
420 > coalescence occurred, the step-edges in the other simulations
421 > preferred to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in
422 > the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA~for Pt and $\sim$14\AA~for Au.
423 > Previous work by Williams {\it et al}.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
424   highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
425   when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
426 < repulsion arises because step-edge crossing is not allowed
427 < which constrains the entropy. This entropic repulsion does
428 < not completely define the interactions between steps, which
429 < is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence, where
430 < additional attractive interactions can overcome the repulsion.\cite{Williams:1991}
431 < The presence and concentration of adsorbates, as shown in
432 < this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially leading
433 < to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
426 > repulsion is caused by an entropic barrier that arises from
427 > the fact that steps cannot cross over one another. This entropic
428 > repulsion does not completely define the interactions between
429 > steps, however, so it is possible to observe step coalescence
430 > on some surfaces.\cite{Williams:1991} The presence and
431 > concentration of adsorbates, as shown in this work, can
432 > affect step-step interactions, potentially leading to a new
433 > surface structure as the thermodynamic equilibrium.
434  
435   \subsubsection{Double layers}
436 < Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
437 < undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
436 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
437 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.
438   The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
439 < Similar behavior has been seen on numerous surfaces
440 < at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
439 > Similar behavior has been seen on a number of surfaces
440 > at varying conditions, including Ni(977) and Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
441   Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
442 < propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
443 < because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
444 < The amount of reconstruction is strongly correlated to the amount of CO
442 > propensity for reconstruction  
443 > because of the larger surface mobility and the greater extent of step wandering.
444 > The amount of reconstruction was strongly correlated to the amount of CO
445   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
446   effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
447 < surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
448 < step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
449 < doubling seen by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
450 < Over longer periods, (150~ns) two more double layers formed
451 < on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
452 < in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454 < general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
447 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. Only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
448 > doubling seen by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
449 > Over a longer time scale (150~ns) two more double layers formed
450 > on this surface. Although double layer formation did not occur
451 > in the other Pt systems, they exhibited more step-wandering and
452 > roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
453   50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
454   various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
455  
456 < The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
457 < Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
458 < across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
456 > The second reconstruction observed by
457 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
458 > across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither metal, within
459   the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
460   the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
461  
462   %Evolution of surface
463   \begin{figure}[H]
464 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
464 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation}
465   \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
466    initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
467    (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
# Line 474 | Line 472 | Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dea
472   \end{figure}
473  
474   \subsection{Dynamics}
475 < Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
476 < with the energetics and structures at different conditions
477 < \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
478 < technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo approaches give an efficient
479 < sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
480 < of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
481 < Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
482 < of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
485 < $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 < the doubling to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we were able to probe the dynamics of these reconstructions and in this section we give data on dynamic and
487 < transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
475 > Previous experimental work by Pearl and Sibener\cite{Pearl},
476 > using STM, has been able to capture the coalescence of steps
477 > on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition, $\sim$70~s/image,
478 > provides an upper bound for the time required for the doubling
479 > to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we are able to probe
480 > the dynamics of these reconstructions at elevated temperatures
481 > and in this section we provide data on the timescales for transport
482 > properties, e.g. diffusion and layer formation time.
483  
484  
485   \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
486   %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
487 < The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
487 > The wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
488   arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
489   displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
490   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
491   be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
492   on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
493 < Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
493 > Single-atom break-away from a step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
494   energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
495   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
496   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
497 < on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Figures \ref{fig:sketchGraphic} and \ref{fig:sketchEnergies}, the penalty can fall to as low as
497 > on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Discussion, the penalty can fall to as low as
498   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
499 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
499 > diffusion is negligible (\textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
500   able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
501 < becoming a part of a different edge. It is a difficult process for an atom
501 > becoming a part of a different edge. It is an energetically unfavorable process with a high barrier for an atom
502   to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
503   energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
504   metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
505   diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
506   observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
507 < equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
507 > equilibrium with the step-edges.
508   At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
509   observed moving together across the surfaces.
510  
511   A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
512 < between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
513 < truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
512 > between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). A mobile atom
513 > would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
514   was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
515   movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
516   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
# Line 525 | Line 520 | diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}
520  
521   %Diffusion graph
522   \begin{figure}[H]
523 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
523 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1}
524   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
525    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
526    ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
# Line 539 | Line 534 | The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data
534   \label{fig:diff}
535   \end{figure}
536  
537 < The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data in Figure \ref{fig:diff} is likely due
538 < to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower observed
539 < coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
540 < then further limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
541 < between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
542 < definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
543 < explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
544 < the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
545 < stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms and so
546 < atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have now been buried. By
547 < performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
548 < (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer, we obtain
549 < the larger values for both $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ at the 50\% coverage.
550 < This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
556 < expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
557 < drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
558 < mechanism of double layer formation focuses on the effect that CO on the
559 < surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
560 < coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
561 < thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
562 < arrangements of CO on the surface allowing the formation of a path,
563 < a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
564 < As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
565 < changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
566 < potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
567 < their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
537 > The weaker Au-CO interaction is evident in the weak CO-coverage
538 > dependance of Au diffusion. This weak interaction leads to lower
539 > observed coverages when compared to dosage amounts. This further
540 > limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
541 > between coverage and Pt diffusion rates shows a near linear relationship
542 > at the earliest times in the simulations. Following double layer formation,
543 > however, there is a precipitous drop in adatom diffusion. As the double
544 > layer forms, many atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have
545 > now been buried resulting in a smaller reported diffusion constant. A
546 > secondary effect of higher coverages is CO-CO cross interactions that
547 > lower the effective mobility of the Pt adatoms that are bound to each CO.
548 > This effect would become evident only at higher coverages. A detailed
549 > account of Pt adatom energetics follows in the Discussion.
550 >
551  
569
570
552   \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
553 < The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
554 < CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
555 < a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
556 < has higher diffusion constants but did not show
557 < any signs of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
558 < 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time, while two more were formed as the system was run for an additional
559 < 110~ns (150~ns total). Previous experimental
560 < work gives insight into the upper bounds of the
561 < time required for step coalescence.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
562 < In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
563 < appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
564 < into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
565 < formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
566 < has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
567 < ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
568 < appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
569 < $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
570 < The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
571 < 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper
572 < bounds of the image scan, it is likely that most aspects of this
573 < reconstruction occur very rapidly. A possible explanation
574 < for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
594 < under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
595 < take longer at lower temperatures.
553 > The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages is the primary
554 > contributor to double layer formation. However, this is not a complete
555 > explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system has higher diffusion constants, but
556 > did not show any signs of edge doubling in 40~ns. On the 50\%~Pt
557 > system, one double layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time,
558 > while two more were formed as the system was allowed to run for an
559 > additional 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction
560 > is a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound is a
561 > very large overestimate.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl} In this system the first
562 > appearance of a double layer appears at 19~ns into the simulation.
563 > Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has formed
564 > the double layer and by 86~ns the complete layer has flattened out.
565 > From the appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed
566 > double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another $\sim$40~ns was
567 > necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in
568 > this simulation formed over periods of 22~ns and 42~ns respectively.
569 > A possible explanation for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated
570 > temperatures under which our systems were simulated. The process
571 > would almost certainly take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally,
572 > our measured times for completion of the doubling after the appearance
573 > of a nucleation site are likely affected by our periodic boxes. A longer
574 > step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''.
575  
576  
577 + %Discussion
578 + \section{Discussion}
579 + We have shown that a classical potential is able to model the initial
580 + reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption, and have
581 + reproduced the double layer structure observed by Tao {\it et
582 +  al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. Additionally, this reconstruction appears to be
583 + rapid -- occurring within 100 ns of the initial exposure to CO.  Here
584 + we discuss the features of the classical potential that are
585 + contributing to the stability and speed of the Pt(557) reconstruction.
586  
587 + \subsection{Diffusion}
588 + The perpendicular diffusion constant appears to be the most important
589 + indicator of double layer formation. As highlighted in Figure
590 + \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the formation of the double layer did not begin
591 + until a nucleation site appeared.  Williams {\it et
592 +  al}.\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} cite an effective edge-edge
593 + repulsion arising from the inability of edge crossing.  This repulsion
594 + must be overcome to allow step coalescence.  A larger
595 + $\textbf{D}_\perp$ value implies more step-wandering and a larger
596 + chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges to create a nucleation
597 + point.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a
598 + nascent double layer. This helps explain the rapid time scale for
599 + double layer completion after the appearance of a nucleation site, while
600 + the initial appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
601  
602 + \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
603 + Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of our
604 + simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system which
605 + did exhibit doubling. A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain
606 + the role of adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar
607 + repulsion between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
608 + possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
609 + short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
610 + molecules are ``locked'' in a vertical orientation, through atop
611 + adsorption for example, this explanation would gain credence. The
612 + calculated energetic repulsion between two CO molecules located a
613 + distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both
614 + in a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the
615 + second nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to
616 + nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical
617 + orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the carbons are locked at
618 + a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached when the
619 + angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.  The calculated
620 + barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
621 + repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the
622 + surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests
623 + that the CO molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40
624 + to 2500 times larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests
625 + that the CO molecules jump between different Pt atoms throughout the
626 + simulation, but can stay bound for significant periods of time.
627  
628 + A different interpretation of the above mechanism which takes the
629 + large mobility of the CO into account, would be in the destabilization
630 + of Pt-Pt interactions due to bound CO.  Destabilizing Pt-Pt bonds at
631 + the edges could lead to increased step-edge breakup and diffusion. On
632 + the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach an edge atom
633 + is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
634 + \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain
635 + configurations, cases (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to
636 + $\sim$23~kcal/mol by the presence of bound CO molecules. In these
637 + instances, it becomes energetically favorable to roughen the edge by
638 + introducing a small separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening
639 + becomes immediately obvious in simulations with significant CO
640 + populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent on surfaces
641 + with lower CO coverage (and even on the bare surfaces), although in
642 + these cases it is likely due to random fluctuations that squeeze out
643 + step-edge atoms. Step-edge breakup by continuous single-atom
644 + translations (as suggested by these energy curves) is probably a
645 + worst-case scenario.  Multistep mechanisms in which an adatom moves
646 + laterally on the surface after being ejected would be more
647 + energetically favorable.  This would leave the adatom alongside the
648 + ledge, providing it with 5 nearest neighbors.  While fewer than the 7
649 + neighbors it had as part of the step-edge, it keeps more Pt neighbors
650 + than the 3 an isolated adatom would have on the terrace. In this
651 + proposed mechanism, the CO quadrupolar repulsion still plays a role in
652 + the initial roughening of the step-edge, but not in any long-term
653 + bonds with individual Pt atoms.  Higher CO coverages create more
654 + opportunities for the crowded CO configurations shown in Figure
655 + \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and this is likely to cause an increased
656 + propensity for step-edge breakup.
657  
658   %Sketch graphic of different configurations
659   \begin{figure}[H]
660 < \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
661 < \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
662 < the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
663 < upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
664 < complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
665 < Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
660 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{COpaths}
661 > \caption{Configurations used to investigate the mechanism of step-edge
662 >  breakup on Pt(557). In each case, the central (starred) atom is
663 >  pulled directly across the surface away from the step edge.  The Pt
664 >  atoms on the upper terrace are colored dark grey, while those on the
665 >  lower terrace are in white.  In each of these configurations, some
666 >  number of the atoms (highlighted in blue) had a CO molecule bound in
667 >  a vertical atop position.  The energies of these configurations as a
668 >  function of central atom displacement are displayed in Figure
669 >  \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
670   \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
671   \end{figure}
672  
673   %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
674   \begin{figure}[H]
675 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
676 < \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
677 < surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
678 < to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
679 < same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
680 < the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
681 < However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
682 < configurations of CO will be more likely. }
675 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison}
676 > \caption{Energies for displacing a single edge atom perpendicular to
677 >  the step edge as a function of atomic displacement. Each of the
678 >  energy curves corresponds to one of the labeled configurations in
679 >  Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and are referenced to the
680 >  unperturbed step-edge.  Certain arrangements of bound CO (notably
681 >  configurations g and h) can lower the energetic barrier for creating
682 >  an adatom relative to the bare surface (configuration a).}
683   \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
684   \end{figure}
685  
686 < %Discussion
687 < \section{Discussion}
688 < We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
689 < Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
690 < were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
686 > While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase
687 > diffusion and the likelihood of edge wandering, this does not provide
688 > a complete explanation for the formation of double layers. If adatoms
689 > were constrained to their original terraces then doubling could not
690 > occur.  A mechanism for vertical displacement of adatoms at the
691 > step-edge is required to explain the doubling.
692  
693 < \subsection{Diffusion}
694 < As shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}, for the Pt systems, there
695 < is a strong trend toward higher diffusion constants as
696 < surface coverage of CO increases. The drop for the 50\%
697 < case being explained as double layer formation already
698 < beginning to occur in the analyzed 40~ns, which lowered
699 < the calculated diffusion rates. Between the parallel and
700 < perpendicular rates, the perpendicular diffusion constant
701 < appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
702 < formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
703 < formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
704 < site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
705 < the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective repulsion.
706 < This repulsion must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
707 < A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
708 < and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
709 < to form the nucleation point. Upon that appearance, parallel
710 < diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up the double
650 < layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
651 < the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
652 < appearance of said site was unpredictable.
693 > We have discovered one possible mechanism for a CO-mediated vertical
694 > displacement of Pt atoms at the step edge. Figure \ref{fig:lambda}
695 > shows four points along a reaction coordinate in which a CO-bound
696 > adatom along the step-edge ``burrows'' into the edge and displaces the
697 > original edge atom onto the higher terrace. A number of events similar
698 > to this mechanism were observed during the simulations.  We predict an
699 > energetic barrier of 20~kcal/mol for this process (in which the
700 > displaced edge atom follows a curvilinear path into an adjacent 3-fold
701 > hollow site).  The barrier heights we obtain for this reaction
702 > coordinate are approximate because the exact path is unknown, but the
703 > calculated energy barriers would be easily accessible at operating
704 > conditions.  Additionally, this mechanism is exothermic, with a final
705 > energy 15~kcal/mol below the original $\lambda = 0$ configuration.
706 > When CO is not present and this reaction coordinate is followed, the
707 > process is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol.  The difference in the relative
708 > energies for the $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=1$ case when CO is present
709 > provides strong support for CO-mediated Pt-Pt interactions giving rise
710 > to the doubling reconstruction.
711  
654 \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
655 Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
656 our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
657 which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
658 Similarities of our results to those reported previously by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
659 are quite strong. The simulated Pt system exposed to a large dosage
660 of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace widths and step heights.
661 The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a
662 time, but is rapid on experimental timescales. The adatoms either break
663 away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift up onto
664 a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace until reaching
665 another step-edge or rejoining their original edge. This combination of
666 growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
667 However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in Figure 1.B,
668 this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
669 From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the
670 initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
671
672 A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
673 CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
674 CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  However,
675 the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
676 some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
677 relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
678 gains some credence. The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
679 distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
680 a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
681 nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
682 nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical orientation
683 also lowers the repulsion. A minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at when the
684 angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}, when the carbons are
685 locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart. As mentioned above, the energy barrier
686 for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between
687 neighboring CO molecules can increase the surface diffusion. However, the
688 residence time of CO on Pt was examined and while the majority of the CO is
689 on or near the surface throughout the run, the molecules are extremely mobile,
690 with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times larger, depending on coverage. This
691 mobility suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without
692 necessarily the Pt along with them.
693
694 Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
695 destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
696 Pt atoms. To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
697 CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
698 around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. A few sample
699 configurations are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}, with
700 energies at various positions along the path displayed in Table
701 \ref{tab:rxcoord}. Certain configurations of CO, cases B and D for
702 example, can have quite strong energetic reasons for breaking
703 away from the step-edge. Although the packing of these configurations
704 is unlikely until CO coverage has reached a high enough value.
705 These examples are showing the most difficult cases, immediate
706 adatom formation through breakage away from the step-edge, which
707 is why their energies at large distances are relatively high. There are
708 mechanistic paths where an edge atom could get shifted to onto the
709 step-edge to form a small peak before fully breaking away. And again,
710 once the adatom is formed, the barrier for diffusion on the surface is
711 negligible. These sample configurations help explain CO's effect on
712 general surface mobility and step wandering, but they are lacking in
713 providing a mechanism for the formation of double layers. One possible
714 mechanism is elucidated in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, where a burrowing
715 and lifting process of an adatom and step-edge atom respectively is
716 examined. The system, without CO present, is nearly energetically
717 neutral, whereas with CO present there is a $\sim$ 15 kcal/mol drop
718 in the energy of the system.
719
712   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
713   \begin{figure}[H]
714 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
715 < \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
716 < for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
717 < placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
718 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
719 < is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
720 < with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
714 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord}
715 > \caption{Points along a possible reaction coordinate for CO-mediated
716 >  edge doubling. Here, a CO-bound adatom burrows into an established
717 >  step edge and displaces an edge atom onto the upper terrace along a
718 >  curvilinear path.  The approximate barrier for the process is
719 >  20~kcal/mol, and the complete process is exothermic by 15~kcal/mol
720 >  in the presence of CO, but is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol without.}
721   \label{fig:lambda}
722   \end{figure}
723  
724 + The mechanism for doubling on the Pt(557) surface appears to require
725 + the cooperation of at least two distinct processes. For complete
726 + doubling of a layer to occur there must be a breakup of one
727 + terrace. These atoms must then ``disappear'' from that terrace, either
728 + by travelling to the terraces above of below their original levels.
729 + The presence of CO helps explain mechanisms for both of these
730 + situations. There must be sufficient breakage of the step-edge to
731 + increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and these adatoms
732 + must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above (or a comparable
733 + mechanism) to create the double layer.  With sufficient time, these
734 + mechanisms working in concert lead to the formation of a double layer.
735  
736 + \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
737 + Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system, it remained for
738 + the rest of the simulation time with minimal movement.  Random
739 + fluctuations that involved small clusters or divots were observed, but
740 + these features typically healed within a few nanoseconds.  Within our
741 + simulations, the formation of the double layer appeared to be
742 + irreversible and a double layer was never observed to split back into
743 + two single layer step-edges while CO was present.
744  
745 + To further gauge the effect CO has on this surface, additional
746 + simulations were run starting from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt
747 + system that had already formed double layers. These simulations then
748 + had their CO forcibly removed.  The double layer broke apart rapidly
749 + in these simulations, showing a well-defined edge-splitting after
750 + 100~ps. Configurations of this system are shown in Figure
751 + \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring of the top and bottom layers helps to
752 + exhibit how much mixing the edges experience as they split. These
753 + systems were only examined for 10~ns, and within that time despite the
754 + initial rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few
755 + \AA~apart. It is possible that with longer simulation times, the (557)
756 + surface recovery observed by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} could
757 + also be recovered.
758  
735
759   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
760   \begin{figure}[H]
761 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
762 < \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
763 < helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
764 < and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
765 < there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
761 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking}
762 > \caption{Dynamics of an established (111) double step after removal of
763 >  the adsorbed CO: (A) 0~ps, (B) 100~ps, and (C) 1~ns after the removal
764 >  of CO. The presence of the CO helped maintain the stability of the
765 >  double step.  Nearly immediately after the CO is removed, the step
766 >  edge reforms in a (100) configuration, which is also the step type
767 >  seen on clean (557) surfaces. The step separation involves
768 >  significant mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
769   \label{fig:breaking}
770   \end{figure}
771  
772  
747
748
773   %Peaks!
774   %\begin{figure}[H]
775   %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
# Line 759 | Line 783 | in the energy of the system.
783   %Don't think I need this
784   %clean surface...
785   %\begin{figure}[H]
786 < %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
786 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF}
787   %\caption{}
788  
789   %\end{figure}
# Line 767 | Line 791 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
791  
792  
793   \section{Conclusion}
794 < In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
794 > The strength and directionality of the Pt-CO binding interaction, as
795 > well as the large quadrupolar repulsion between atop-bound CO
796 > molecules, help to explain the observed increase in surface mobility
797 > of Pt(557) and the resultant reconstruction into a double-layer
798 > configuration at the highest simulated CO-coverages.  The weaker Au-CO
799 > interaction results in significantly lower adataom diffusion
800 > constants, less step-wandering, and a lack of the double layer
801 > reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
802  
803 + An in-depth examination of the energetics shows the important role CO
804 + plays in increasing step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal
805 + which are both necessary for double layer formation.
806 +
807   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
808  
809   %Table of Diffusion Constants
# Line 792 | Line 827 | Support for this project was provided by the National
827   % \end{table}
828  
829   \begin{acknowledgement}
830 < Support for this project was provided by the National Science
831 < Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
832 < Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
833 < Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
830 >  We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. William
831 >  F. Schneider and Dr. Feng Tao.  Support for this project was
832 >  provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243
833 >  and by the Center for Sustainable Energy at Notre Dame
834 >  (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
835 >  Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
836   \end{acknowledgement}
837   \newpage
838   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines