ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3879 by jmichalk, Mon Mar 18 21:20:12 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3880 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 19 15:01:59 2013 UTC

# Line 86 | Line 86 | systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au syst
86   is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
87   systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
88  
89 +
90 + The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557)
91 + and Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO)
92 + were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
93 + interactions were parameterized from experimental data and plane-wave
94 + Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large difference in
95 + binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions was found to play
96 + a significant role in step-edge stability and adatom diffusion constants.
97 + The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface is sufficient to explain the
98 + step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and the lack of such
99 + a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
100   \end{abstract}
101  
102   \newpage
# Line 161 | Line 172 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{EAM} The CO was mod
172   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
173   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
174   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
175 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{EAM} The CO was modeled using a rigid
175 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{Foiles86} The CO was modeled using a rigid
176   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
177   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
178   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 174 | Line 185 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al
185   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
186   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
187   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
188 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}. is among the
189 < fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
188 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88} is among the
189 > fastest of these density functional approaches. In
190   all of these models, atoms are treated as a positively charged
191   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
192   calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
# Line 600 | Line 611 | which did exhibit doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig
611   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
612   Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of
613   our simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
614 < which did exhibit doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}. A
614 > which did exhibit doubling. A
615   number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
616   CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between
617   adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  
618   However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and
619   is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in
620   a specific orientation relative to each other, through atop adsorption for
621 < example, this explanation would gain credence. The energetic repulsion
621 > example, this explanation would gain credence. The calculated energetic repulsion
622   between two CO molecules located a distance of 2.77~\AA~apart
623   (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in a vertical orientation,
624   is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the second nearest-neighbor distance
# Line 615 | Line 626 | The barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is on
626   from a purely vertical orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the
627   carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is
628   reached when the angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.
629 < The barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
629 > The calculated barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
630   repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the surface
631   diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests that these
632   molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times
633 < larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests that the CO are more
634 < likely to shift their positions without dragging the Pt along with them.
633 > larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests that the CO molecules jump
634 > between different Pt atoms throughout the simulation, but will stay bound for
635 > significant periods of time.
636  
637   A different interpretation of the above mechanism, taking into account the large
638   mobility of the CO, looks at how instantaneous and short-lived configurations of
639   CO on the surface can destabilize Pt-Pt interactions leading to increased step-edge
640   breakup and diffusion. On the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach
641 < an edge atom is $\sim$~43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
641 > an edge atom is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
642   \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain configurations, cases
643 < (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to $\sim$~23~kcal/mole. In these instances,
643 > (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to $\sim$23~kcal/mole. In these instances,
644   it becomes quite energetically favorable to roughen the edge by introducing a small
645   separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening becomes immediately obvious in
646 < simulations with significant CO populations, although it is present to a lesser extent
647 < on lower coverage surfaces and even on the bare surfaces. In these cases it is likely
646 > simulations with significant CO populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent
647 > on lower coverage surfaces and even on the bare surfaces, although in these cases it is likely
648   due to stochastic vibrational processes that squeeze out step-edge atoms. The mechanism
649 < of step-edge breakup suggested by these energy curves is one the most difficult
649 > of step-edge breakup suggested by these energy curves is one of the most difficult
650   processes, a complete break-away from the step-edge in one unbroken movement.
651   Easier multistep mechanisms likely exist where an adatom moves laterally on the surface
652 < after being ejected so it is sitting on the edge. This provides the atom with 5 nearest
652 > after being ejected so it ends up alongside the ledge. This provides the atom with 5 nearest
653   neighbors, which while lower than the 7 if it had stayed a part of the step-edge, is higher
654   than the 3 it could maintain located on the terrace. In this proposed mechanism, the CO
655   quadrupolar repulsion is still playing a primary role, but for its importance in roughening
656   the step-edge, rather than maintaining long-term bonds with a single Pt atom which is not
657   born out by their mobility data. The requirement for a large density of CO on the surface
658 < for some of the more favorable suggested mechanisms in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}
658 > for some of the more favorable suggested configurations in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}
659   correspond well with the increased mobility seen on higher coverage surfaces.
660  
661   %Sketch graphic of different configurations
# Line 674 | Line 686 | would not be enough atoms to finish the doubling. Real
686   this does not immediately provide an explanation for the formation of double
687   layers. If adatoms were constrained to their terrace then doubling would be
688   much less likely to occur. Nucleation sites could still potentially form, but there
689 < would not be enough atoms to finish the doubling. Real materials, where the
690 < step lengths can be taken as infinite, local doubling would be possible, but in
691 < our simulations with our periodic treatment of the system, this is not possible.
689 > would not be enough atoms to finish the doubling. For a non-simulated metal surface, where the
690 > step lengths can be assumed to be infinite relative to atomic sizes, local doubling would be possible, but in
691 > our simulations with our periodic treatment of the system, the system is not large enough to experience this effect.
692   Thus, there must be a mechanism that explains how adatoms are able to move
693   amongst terraces. Figure \ref{fig:lambda} shows points along a reaction coordinate
694   where an adatom along the step-edge with an adsorbed CO ``burrows'' into the
# Line 684 | Line 696 | are the more interesting results from this investigati
696   because of similar events that were observed during the simulations. The barrier
697   heights we obtained are only approximations because we constrained the movement
698   of the highlighted atoms along a specific concerted path. The calculated $\Delta E$'s
699 < are the more interesting results from this investigation. When CO is not present and
699 > are provide a strong energetic support for this modeled lifting mechanism. When CO is not present and
700   this reaction coordinate is followed, the $\Delta E > 3$~kcal/mol. The example shown
701   in the figure, where CO is present in the atop position, has a $\Delta E < -15$~kcal/mol.
702 < While the barrier height is comparable to the non-CO case, that is a nearly a 20~kcal/mol
703 < difference in energies and moves the process from slightly unfavorable to energetically favorable.
702 > While the barrier height is comparable for both cases, there is nearly a 20~kcal/mol
703 > difference in energies and makes the process energetically favorable.
704  
705   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
706   \begin{figure}[H]
707   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
708 < \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
709 < for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
710 < placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
711 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
700 < is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
701 < with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
708 > \caption{ Various points along a reaction coordinate are displayed in the figure.
709 > The mechanism of edge traversal is examined in the presence of CO. The approximate
710 > barrier for the displayed process is 20~kcal/mol. However, the $\Delta E$ of this process
711 > is -15~kcal/mol making it an energetically favorable process.}
712   \label{fig:lambda}
713   \end{figure}
714  
715 < The mechanism for doubling on this surface appears to be a convolution of at least
715 > The mechanism for doubling on this surface appears to require the cooperation of at least
716   these two described processes. For complete doubling of a layer to occur there must
717   be the equivalent removal of a separate terrace. For those atoms to ``disappear'' from
718   that terrace they must either rise up on the ledge above them or drop to the ledge below
719 < them. The presence of CO helps with both of these situations. There must be sufficient
720 < breakage of the step-edge to increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface.
721 < These adatoms must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above or some comparable
719 > them. The presence of CO helps with the energetics of both of these situations. There must be sufficient
720 > breakage of the step-edge to increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and
721 > these adatoms must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above or some comparable
722   mechanism to traverse the step-edge. Over time, these mechanisms working in concert
723 < led to the formation of a double layer.
723 > lead to the formation of a double layer.
724  
725   \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
726   Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system it
# Line 740 | Line 750 | It is possible with longer simulation times that the
750   \begin{figure}[H]
751   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
752   \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
753 < helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
754 < and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
755 < there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
753 > helped maintain the stability of the double layer and its microfaceting of the double layer
754 > into a (111) configuration. This microfacet immediately reverts to the original (100) step
755 > edge which is a hallmark of the (557) surface. The separation is not a simple sliding apart, rather
756 > there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
757   \label{fig:breaking}
758   \end{figure}
759  
# Line 770 | Line 781 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
781  
782  
783   \section{Conclusion}
784 < In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
784 > The strength of the Pt-CO binding interaction as well as the large
785 > quadrupolar repulsion between CO molecules are sufficient to
786 > explain the observed increase in surface mobility and the resultant
787 > reconstructions at the highest simulated coverage. The weaker
788 > Au-CO interaction results in lower diffusion constants, less step-wandering,
789 > and a lack of the double layer reconstruction. An in-depth examination
790 > of the energetics shows the important role CO plays in increasing
791 > step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal which are both
792 > necessary for double layer formation.
793  
794 +
795 +
796   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
797  
798   %Table of Diffusion Constants

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines