ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3880 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 19 15:01:59 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3885 by jmichalk, Wed Mar 20 17:50:18 2013 UTC

# Line 20 | Line 20
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22   \usepackage{multicol}
23 + \usepackage{wrapfig}
24 + \mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
25 + %\usepackage{epstopdf}
26  
27   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
28   % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
29   \usepackage{url}
30   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
31   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
32 < 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
32 > 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=1110000
33  
34   % double space list of tables and figures
35   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
# Line 73 | Line 76 | We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) u
76  
77  
78   \begin{abstract}
79 < We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
80 < various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
81 < explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
82 < and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
83 < as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
84 < this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
85 < strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
86 < role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
87 < small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
88 < was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
89 < is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
90 < systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
88 <
89 <
90 < The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557)
91 < and Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO)
92 < were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
93 < interactions were parameterized from experimental data and plane-wave
94 < Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large difference in
95 < binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions was found to play
96 < a significant role in step-edge stability and adatom diffusion constants.
97 < The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface is sufficient to explain the
98 < step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and the lack of such
99 < a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
79 >  The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557) and
80 >  Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO) were
81 >  investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
82 >  interactions were parameterized from experimental data and
83 >  plane-wave Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large
84 >  difference in binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions
85 >  was found to play a significant role in step-edge stability and
86 >  adatom diffusion constants.  Various mechanisms for CO-mediated step
87 >  wandering and step doubling were investigated on the Pt(557)
88 >  surface.  We find that the energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
89 >  can explain the step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and
90 >  the lack of such a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
91   \end{abstract}
92  
93   \newpage
# Line 218 | Line 209 | properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007
209   The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) potentials
210   have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
211   simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
212 < properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
212 > properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq,mishin99:_inter}
213   melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
214 < fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
215 < propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
216 < dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
214 > fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx,mishin01:cu} crack
215 > propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg,Rifkin1992} and alloying
216 > dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni} One of EAM's strengths
217   is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
218   because interactions
219   up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account in the parameterization.\cite{Voter95a}
# Line 233 | Line 224 | theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potential
224   surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAM's functional
225   treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
226   theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
227 < \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
227 >
228  
229  
230  
# Line 399 | Line 390 | source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,
390   data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
391   data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
392   systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
393 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
393 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,openmd}
394  
395  
396  
# Line 471 | Line 462 | the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
462  
463   %Evolution of surface
464   \begin{figure}[H]
465 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
465 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation}
466   \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
467    initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
468    (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
# Line 530 | Line 521 | diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}
521  
522   %Diffusion graph
523   \begin{figure}[H]
524 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
524 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1}
525   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
526    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
527    ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
# Line 586 | Line 577 | We have shown that a classical potential model is able
577  
578   %Discussion
579   \section{Discussion}
580 < We have shown that a classical potential model is able to model the
581 < initial reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as
582 < shown by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we were
583 < able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for
584 < this reconstruction. Here we discuss the features of the model that
585 < give rise to the observed dynamical properties of the (557) reconstruction.
580 > We have shown that a classical potential is able to model the initial
581 > reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption, and have
582 > reproduced the double layer structure observed by Tao {\it et
583 >  al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. Additionally, this reconstruction appears to be
584 > rapid -- occurring within 100 ns of the initial exposure to CO.  Here
585 > we discuss the features of the classical potential that are
586 > contributing to the stability and speed of the Pt(557) reconstruction.
587  
588   \subsection{Diffusion}
589 < The perpendicular diffusion constant
590 < appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
591 < formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
592 < formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
593 < site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams {\it et al}.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
594 < the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective edge-edge repulsion that
595 < must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
596 < A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
597 < and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
598 < to create a nucleation point. Parallel diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a nascent double
599 < layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
600 < the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
601 < appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
589 > The perpendicular diffusion constant appears to be the most important
590 > indicator of double layer formation. As highlighted in Figure
591 > \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the formation of the double layer did not begin
592 > until a nucleation site appeared.  Williams {\it et
593 >  al}.\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} cite an effective edge-edge
594 > repulsion arising from the inability of edge crossing.  This repulsion
595 > must be overcome to allow step coalescence.  A larger
596 > $\textbf{D}_\perp$ value implies more step-wandering and a larger
597 > chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges to create a nucleation
598 > point.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a
599 > nascent double layer. This helps explain the rapid time scale for
600 > double layer completion after the appearance of a nucleation site, while
601 > the initial appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
602  
603   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
604 < Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of
605 < our simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
606 < which did exhibit doubling. A
607 < number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
608 < CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between
609 < adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  
610 < However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and
611 < is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in
612 < a specific orientation relative to each other, through atop adsorption for
613 < example, this explanation would gain credence. The calculated energetic repulsion
614 < between two CO molecules located a distance of 2.77~\AA~apart
615 < (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in a vertical orientation,
616 < is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the second nearest-neighbor distance
617 < of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away
618 < from a purely vertical orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the
619 < carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is
620 < reached when the angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.
621 < The calculated barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
622 < repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the surface
623 < diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests that these
624 < molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times
625 < larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests that the CO molecules jump
626 < between different Pt atoms throughout the simulation, but will stay bound for
627 < significant periods of time.
604 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of our
605 > simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system which
606 > did exhibit doubling. A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain
607 > the role of adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar
608 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
609 > possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
610 > short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
611 > molecules are ``locked'' in a vertical orientation, through atop
612 > adsorption for example, this explanation would gain credence. The
613 > calculated energetic repulsion between two CO molecules located a
614 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both
615 > in a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the
616 > second nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to
617 > nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical
618 > orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the carbons are locked at
619 > a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached when the
620 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.  The calculated
621 > barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
622 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the
623 > surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests
624 > that the CO molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40
625 > to 2500 times larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests
626 > that the CO molecules jump between different Pt atoms throughout the
627 > simulation, but can stay bound for significant periods of time.
628  
629 < A different interpretation of the above mechanism, taking into account the large
630 < mobility of the CO, looks at how instantaneous and short-lived configurations of
631 < CO on the surface can destabilize Pt-Pt interactions leading to increased step-edge
632 < breakup and diffusion. On the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach
633 < an edge atom is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
634 < \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain configurations, cases
635 < (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to $\sim$23~kcal/mole. In these instances,
636 < it becomes quite energetically favorable to roughen the edge by introducing a small
637 < separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening becomes immediately obvious in
638 < simulations with significant CO populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent
639 < on lower coverage surfaces and even on the bare surfaces, although in these cases it is likely
640 < due to stochastic vibrational processes that squeeze out step-edge atoms. The mechanism
641 < of step-edge breakup suggested by these energy curves is one of the most difficult
642 < processes, a complete break-away from the step-edge in one unbroken movement.
643 < Easier multistep mechanisms likely exist where an adatom moves laterally on the surface
644 < after being ejected so it ends up alongside the ledge. This provides the atom with 5 nearest
645 < neighbors, which while lower than the 7 if it had stayed a part of the step-edge, is higher
646 < than the 3 it could maintain located on the terrace. In this proposed mechanism, the CO
647 < quadrupolar repulsion is still playing a primary role, but for its importance in roughening
648 < the step-edge, rather than maintaining long-term bonds with a single Pt atom which is not
649 < born out by their mobility data. The requirement for a large density of CO on the surface
650 < for some of the more favorable suggested configurations in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}
651 < correspond well with the increased mobility seen on higher coverage surfaces.
629 > A different interpretation of the above mechanism which takes the
630 > large mobility of the CO into account, would be in the destabilization
631 > of Pt-Pt interactions due to bound CO.  Destabilizing Pt-Pt bonds at
632 > the edges could lead to increased step-edge breakup and diffusion. On
633 > the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach an edge atom
634 > is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
635 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain
636 > configurations, cases (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to
637 > $\sim$23~kcal/mol by the presence of bound CO molecules. In these
638 > instances, it becomes energetically favorable to roughen the edge by
639 > introducing a small separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening
640 > becomes immediately obvious in simulations with significant CO
641 > populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent on surfaces
642 > with lower CO coverage (and even on the bare surfaces), although in
643 > these cases it is likely due to random fluctuations that squeeze out
644 > step-edge atoms. Step-edge breakup by continuous single-atom
645 > translations (as suggested by these energy curves) is probably a
646 > worst-case scenario.  Multistep mechanisms in which an adatom moves
647 > laterally on the surface after being ejected would be more
648 > energetically favorable.  This would leave the adatom alongside the
649 > ledge, providing it with 5 nearest neighbors.  While fewer than the 7
650 > neighbors it had as part of the step-edge, it keeps more Pt neighbors
651 > than the 3 an isolated adatom would have on the terrace. In this
652 > proposed mechanism, the CO quadrupolar repulsion still plays a role in
653 > the initial roughening of the step-edge, but not in any long-term
654 > bonds with individual Pt atoms.  Higher CO coverages create more
655 > opportunities for the crowded CO configurations shown in Figure
656 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and this is likely to cause an increased
657 > propensity for step-edge breakup.
658  
659   %Sketch graphic of different configurations
660   \begin{figure}[H]
661 < \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
662 < \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
663 < the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
664 < upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
665 < complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
666 < Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
661 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{COpaths}
662 > \caption{Configurations used to investigate the mechanism of step-edge
663 >  breakup on Pt(557). In each case, the central (starred) atom is
664 >  pulled directly across the surface away from the step edge.  The Pt
665 >  atoms on the upper terrace are colored dark grey, while those on the
666 >  lower terrace are in white.  In each of these configurations, some
667 >  number of the atoms (highlighted in blue) had a CO molecule bound in
668 >  a vertical atop position.  The energies of these configurations as a
669 >  function of central atom displacement are displayed in Figure
670 >  \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
671   \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
672   \end{figure}
673  
674   %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
675   \begin{figure}[H]
676 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
677 < \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
678 < surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
679 < to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
680 < same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
681 < the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
682 < However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
683 < configurations of CO will be more likely. }
676 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison}
677 > \caption{Energies for displacing a single edge atom perpendicular to
678 >  the step edge as a function of atomic displacement. Each of the
679 >  energy curves corresponds to one of the labeled configurations in
680 >  Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and are referenced to the
681 >  unperturbed step-edge.  Certain arrangements of bound CO (notably
682 >  configurations g and h) can lower the energetic barrier for creating
683 >  an adatom relative to the bare surface (configuration a).}
684   \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
685   \end{figure}
686  
687 < While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase diffusion,
688 < this does not immediately provide an explanation for the formation of double
689 < layers. If adatoms were constrained to their terrace then doubling would be
690 < much less likely to occur. Nucleation sites could still potentially form, but there
691 < would not be enough atoms to finish the doubling. For a non-simulated metal surface, where the
692 < step lengths can be assumed to be infinite relative to atomic sizes, local doubling would be possible, but in
691 < our simulations with our periodic treatment of the system, the system is not large enough to experience this effect.
692 < Thus, there must be a mechanism that explains how adatoms are able to move
693 < amongst terraces. Figure \ref{fig:lambda} shows points along a reaction coordinate
694 < where an adatom along the step-edge with an adsorbed CO ``burrows'' into the
695 < edge displacing an atom onto the higher terrace. This mechanism was chosen
696 < because of similar events that were observed during the simulations. The barrier
697 < heights we obtained are only approximations because we constrained the movement
698 < of the highlighted atoms along a specific concerted path. The calculated $\Delta E$'s
699 < are provide a strong energetic support for this modeled lifting mechanism. When CO is not present and
700 < this reaction coordinate is followed, the $\Delta E > 3$~kcal/mol. The example shown
701 < in the figure, where CO is present in the atop position, has a $\Delta E < -15$~kcal/mol.
702 < While the barrier height is comparable for both cases, there is nearly a 20~kcal/mol
703 < difference in energies and makes the process energetically favorable.
687 > While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase
688 > diffusion and the likelihood of edge wandering, this does not provide
689 > a complete explanation for the formation of double layers. If adatoms
690 > were constrained to their original terraces then doubling could not
691 > occur.  A mechanism for vertical displacement of adatoms at the
692 > step-edge is required to explain the doubling.
693  
694 + We have discovered one possible mechanism for a CO-mediated vertical
695 + displacement of Pt atoms at the step edge. Figure \ref{fig:lambda}
696 + shows four points along a reaction coordinate in which a CO-bound
697 + adatom along the step-edge ``burrows'' into the edge and displaces the
698 + original edge atom onto the higher terrace. A number of events similar
699 + to this mechanism were observed during the simulations.  We predict an
700 + energetic barrier of 20~kcal/mol for this process (in which the
701 + displaced edge atom follows a curvilinear path into an adjacent 3-fold
702 + hollow site).  The barrier heights we obtain for this reaction
703 + coordinate are approximate because the exact path is unknown, but the
704 + calculated energy barriers would be easily accessible at operating
705 + conditions.  Additionally, this mechanism is exothermic, with a final
706 + energy 15~kcal/mol below the original $\lambda = 0$ configuration.
707 + When CO is not present and this reaction coordinate is followed, the
708 + process is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol.  The difference in the relative
709 + energies for the $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=1$ case when CO is present
710 + provides strong support for CO-mediated Pt-Pt interactions giving rise
711 + to the doubling reconstruction.
712 +
713   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
714   \begin{figure}[H]
715 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
716 < \caption{ Various points along a reaction coordinate are displayed in the figure.
717 < The mechanism of edge traversal is examined in the presence of CO. The approximate
718 < barrier for the displayed process is 20~kcal/mol. However, the $\Delta E$ of this process
719 < is -15~kcal/mol making it an energetically favorable process.}
715 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord}
716 > \caption{Points along a possible reaction coordinate for CO-mediated
717 >  edge doubling. Here, a CO-bound adatom burrows into an established
718 >  step edge and displaces an edge atom onto the upper terrace along a
719 >  curvilinear path.  The approximate barrier for the process is
720 >  20~kcal/mol, and the complete process is exothermic by 15~kcal/mol
721 >  in the presence of CO, but is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol without.}
722   \label{fig:lambda}
723   \end{figure}
724  
725 < The mechanism for doubling on this surface appears to require the cooperation of at least
726 < these two described processes. For complete doubling of a layer to occur there must
727 < be the equivalent removal of a separate terrace. For those atoms to ``disappear'' from
728 < that terrace they must either rise up on the ledge above them or drop to the ledge below
729 < them. The presence of CO helps with the energetics of both of these situations. There must be sufficient
730 < breakage of the step-edge to increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and
731 < these adatoms must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above or some comparable
732 < mechanism to traverse the step-edge. Over time, these mechanisms working in concert
733 < lead to the formation of a double layer.
725 > The mechanism for doubling on the Pt(557) surface appears to require
726 > the cooperation of at least two distinct processes. For complete
727 > doubling of a layer to occur there must be a breakup of one
728 > terrace. These atoms must then ``disappear'' from that terrace, either
729 > by travelling to the terraces above of below their original levels.
730 > The presence of CO helps explain mechanisms for both of these
731 > situations. There must be sufficient breakage of the step-edge to
732 > increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and these adatoms
733 > must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above (or a comparable
734 > mechanism) to create the double layer.  With sufficient time, these
735 > mechanisms working in concert lead to the formation of a double layer.
736  
737   \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
738 < Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system it
739 < remained for the rest of the simulation time with minimal
740 < movement. There were configurations that showed small
741 < wells or peaks forming, but typically within a few nanoseconds
742 < the feature would smooth away. Within our simulation time,
743 < the formation of the double layer was irreversible and a double
744 < layer was never observed to split back into two single layer
733 < step-edges while CO was present. To further gauge the effect
734 < CO had on this system, additional simulations were run starting
735 < from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt system that had formed
736 < double layers. These simulations then had their CO removed.
737 < The double layer breaks rapidly in these simulations, already
738 < showing a well-defined splitting after 100~ps. Configurations of
739 < this system are shown in Figure \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring
740 < of the top and bottom layers helps to exhibit how much mixing
741 < the edges experience as they split. These systems were only
742 < examined briefly, 10~ns, and within that time despite the initial
743 < rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few \AA~apart.
744 < It is possible with longer simulation times that the
745 < (557) lattice could be recovered as seen by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}
738 > Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system, it remained for
739 > the rest of the simulation time with minimal movement.  Random
740 > fluctuations that involved small clusters or divots were observed, but
741 > these features typically healed within a few nanoseconds.  Within our
742 > simulations, the formation of the double layer appeared to be
743 > irreversible and a double layer was never observed to split back into
744 > two single layer step-edges while CO was present.
745  
746 + To further gauge the effect CO has on this surface, additional
747 + simulations were run starting from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt
748 + system that had already formed double layers. These simulations then
749 + had their CO forcibly removed.  The double layer broke apart rapidly
750 + in these simulations, showing a well-defined edge-splitting after
751 + 100~ps. Configurations of this system are shown in Figure
752 + \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring of the top and bottom layers helps to
753 + exhibit how much mixing the edges experience as they split. These
754 + systems were only examined for 10~ns, and within that time despite the
755 + initial rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few
756 + \AA~apart. It is possible that with longer simulation times, the (557)
757 + surface recovery observed by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} could
758 + also be recovered.
759  
748
760   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
761   \begin{figure}[H]
762 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
763 < \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
764 < helped maintain the stability of the double layer and its microfaceting of the double layer
765 < into a (111) configuration. This microfacet immediately reverts to the original (100) step
766 < edge which is a hallmark of the (557) surface. The separation is not a simple sliding apart, rather
767 < there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
762 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking}
763 > \caption{Dynamics of an established (111) double step after removal of
764 >  the adsorbed CO: (A) 0~ps, (B) 100~ps, and (C) 1~ns after the removal
765 >  of CO. The presence of the CO helped maintain the stability of the
766 >  double step.  Nearly immediately after the CO is removed, the step
767 >  edge reforms in a (100) configuration, which is also the step type
768 >  seen on clean (557) surfaces. The step separation involves
769 >  significant mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
770   \label{fig:breaking}
771   \end{figure}
772  
773  
761
762
774   %Peaks!
775   %\begin{figure}[H]
776   %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
# Line 773 | Line 784 | there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the
784   %Don't think I need this
785   %clean surface...
786   %\begin{figure}[H]
787 < %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
787 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF}
788   %\caption{}
789  
790   %\end{figure}
# Line 781 | Line 792 | The strength of the Pt-CO binding interaction as well
792  
793  
794   \section{Conclusion}
795 < The strength of the Pt-CO binding interaction as well as the large
796 < quadrupolar repulsion between CO molecules are sufficient to
797 < explain the observed increase in surface mobility and the resultant
798 < reconstructions at the highest simulated coverage. The weaker
799 < Au-CO interaction results in lower diffusion constants, less step-wandering,
800 < and a lack of the double layer reconstruction. An in-depth examination
801 < of the energetics shows the important role CO plays in increasing
802 < step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal which are both
792 < necessary for double layer formation.
795 > The strength and directionality of the Pt-CO binding interaction, as
796 > well as the large quadrupolar repulsion between atop-bound CO
797 > molecules, help to explain the observed increase in surface mobility
798 > of Pt(557) and the resultant reconstruction into a double-layer
799 > configuration at the highest simulated CO-coverages.  The weaker Au-CO
800 > interaction results in significantly lower adataom diffusion
801 > constants, less step-wandering, and a lack of the double layer
802 > reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
803  
804 + An in-depth examination of the energetics shows the important role CO
805 + plays in increasing step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal
806 + which are both necessary for double layer formation.
807  
795
808   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
809  
810   %Table of Diffusion Constants
# Line 816 | Line 828 | Support for this project was provided by the National
828   % \end{table}
829  
830   \begin{acknowledgement}
831 < Support for this project was provided by the National Science
832 < Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
833 < Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
834 < Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
831 >  We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. William
832 >  F. Schneider and Dr. Feng Tao.  Support for this project was
833 >  provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243
834 >  and by the Center for Sustainable Energy at Notre Dame
835 >  (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
836 >  Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
837   \end{acknowledgement}
838   \newpage
839   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
840   %\end{doublespace}
841  
842   \begin{tocentry}
843 < %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
843 > A reconstructed Pt(557) surface after having been exposed to a dosage of CO equivalent to half a monolayer of coverage is observed to undergo a doubling of the step-edge height and terrace length.
844 > \includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{TOC_doubleLayer}
845   \end{tocentry}
846  
847   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines