ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3873 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 12 21:33:15 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3884 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 19 21:43:34 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 > \mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
24 > %\usepackage{epstopdf}
25 >
26 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
27 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
28   \usepackage{url}
29   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
30   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
31 < 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
31 > 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=1110000
32  
33   % double space list of tables and figures
34   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
35   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
36   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
37 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
38  
39 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
40 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
39 > %\citestyle{nature}
40 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
41  
42 < \begin{document}
42 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
43 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
44  
45 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
46 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
47 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
48 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
49 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
50 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
51 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
52  
53 + \keywords{}
54 +
55 + \begin{document}
56 +
57 +
58   %%
59   %Introduction
60   %       Experimental observations
# Line 47 | Line 73
73   %Summary
74   %%
75  
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
76  
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Mar 5, 2013}
62
63 %authors
64
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
67
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
77   \begin{abstract}
78 < We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
79 < various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
80 < explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
81 < and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
82 < as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
83 < this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
84 < strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
85 < role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
86 < small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
87 < was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
88 < is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
89 < systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
83 <
78 >  The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557) and
79 >  Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO) were
80 >  investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
81 >  interactions were parameterized from experimental data and
82 >  plane-wave Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large
83 >  difference in binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions
84 >  was found to play a significant role in step-edge stability and
85 >  adatom diffusion constants.  Various mechanisms for CO-mediated step
86 >  wandering and step doubling were investigated on the Pt(557)
87 >  surface.  We find that the energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
88 >  can explain the step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and
89 >  the lack of such a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
90   \end{abstract}
91  
92   \newpage
# Line 112 | Line 118 | This work is an investigation into the mechanism and t
118   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
119   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
120  
121 < This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for
121 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for the Pt(557) \& Au(557)
122   surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
123   of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
124   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
# Line 121 | Line 127 | The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction w
127   catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
128   to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
129   to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
130 < The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
131 < likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
132 < and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
133 < reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxation to the
130 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is less
131 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters {\it et al}.\cite{Peters:2000}
132 > and Piccolo {\it et al}.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
133 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters {\it et al}. saw a relaxation to the
134   22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
135 < become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
135 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction, while
136   allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
137 < configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern being greatly
138 < affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
137 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern on Au(111) being greatly
138 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo {\it et al}. on the other hand, did see a
139   disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
140   surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
141   low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
# Line 144 | Line 150 | adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite l
150   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
151   model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
152   adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
153 < 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
153 > 10$^4$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
154   molecular dynamics
155   (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
156   methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
# Line 156 | Line 162 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was mod
162   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
163   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
164   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
165 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was modeled using a rigid
165 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{Foiles86} The CO was modeled using a rigid
166   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
167   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
168   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 169 | Line 175 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is
175   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
176   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
177   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
178 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is among the
179 < fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
180 < all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
178 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88} is among the
179 > fastest of these density functional approaches. In
180 > all of these models, atoms are treated as a positively charged
181   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
182   calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
183   the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
# Line 208 | Line 214 | from the original parameterization, where the interact
214   propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
215   dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
216   is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
217 < from the original parameterization, where the interactions
218 < up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
219 < Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
217 > because interactions
218 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account in the parameterization.\cite{Voter95a}
219 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88}
220   which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
221   interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
222   the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
223 < surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
223 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAM's functional
224   treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
225   theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
226   \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
# Line 267 | Line 273 | et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit t
273   position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
274   The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
275   than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
276 < et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
277 < Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
276 > {\it et al}.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
277 > Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged, partial
278   binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
279   Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
280   equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
281 < over O as the surface-binding atom. In most cases, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
281 > over O as the surface-binding atom. In most geometries, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
282   repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
283   surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
284   (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
# Line 300 | Line 306 | zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxe
306   performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
307   was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
308   were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
309 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
309 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
310   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
311   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
312   empirical force field.
# Line 309 | Line 315 | and polarization are neglected in this model, although
315   The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
316   are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
317   (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
318 < and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
319 < affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
314 < future work.
318 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects could have
319 > an effect on  binding energies and binding site preferences.
320  
321   %Table  of Parameters
322   %Pt Parameter Set 9
# Line 346 | Line 351 | future work.
351    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
352    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
353   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
354 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
354 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
355    \hline
356   \end{tabular}
357   \label{tab:co_energies}
# Line 355 | Line 360 | dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
360   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
361   Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
362   54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
363 < dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
363 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA. The metal slabs
364 > are 9 and 8 atoms deep respectively, corresponding to a slab
365 > thickness of $\sim$21~\AA~ for Pt and $\sim$19~\AA~for Au.
366   The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
367   along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
368   {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
# Line 364 | Line 371 | The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
371   1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
372   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
373  
374 < The different bulk melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
375 < and 2045~K for Pt) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
374 > The different bulk melting temperatures predicted by EAM (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
375 > and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
376   different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
377   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
378   respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
# Line 382 | Line 389 | source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,
389   data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
390   data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
391   systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
392 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
392 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,openmd}
393  
394  
395  
# Line 391 | Line 398 | The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
398   %
399   \section{Results}
400   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
401 < The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
402 < to undergo remodeling that was not observed in the bare
403 < metal system. The surfaces which were not exposed to CO
404 < did experience minor roughening of the step-edge because
405 < of the elevated temperatures, but the
406 < (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
407 < time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
408 < roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
409 < wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
410 < similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
411 < compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
405 < Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
406 < formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
407 < similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
401 > The bare metal surfaces experienced minor roughening of the
402 > step-edge because of the elevated temperatures, but the (557)
403 > face was stable throughout the simulations. The surface of both
404 > systems, upon dosage of CO, began to undergo extensive remodeling
405 > that was not observed in the bare systems. Reconstructions of
406 > the Au systems were limited to breakup of the step-edges and
407 > some step wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
408 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent. The 50\% coverage
409 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it formed
410 > well-defined and stable double layers through step coalescence,
411 > similar to results reported by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}
412  
413  
414   \subsubsection{Step wandering}
415   The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
416 < movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
417 < coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
418 < adatoms and step-edges alike, also increased. Additionally,
419 < at the higher coverages on both metals, there was more
420 < step-wandering. Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
421 < did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead preferring
422 < to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in the
423 < original (557) lattice. Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
416 > step-wandering at their respective temperatures. As the CO
417 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface atoms,
418 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
419 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system where step
420 > coalescence occurred, the step-edges in the other simulations
421 > preferred to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in
422 > the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA~for Pt and $\sim$14\AA~for Au.
423 > Previous work by Williams {\it et al}.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
424   highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
425   when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
426 < repulsion exists because the entropy of the step-edges is constrained
427 < since step-edge crossing is not allowed. This entropic repulsion
428 < does not completely define the interactions between steps,
429 < which is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence,
430 < where additional attractive interactions can overcome the
431 < repulsion\cite{Williams:1991} and others will not. The presence
432 < of adsorbates can affect these step interactions, potentially
433 < leading to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
426 > repulsion is caused by an entropic barrier that arises from
427 > the fact that steps cannot cross over one another. This entropic
428 > repulsion does not completely define the interactions between
429 > steps, however, so it is possible to observe step coalescence
430 > on some surfaces.\cite{Williams:1991} The presence and
431 > concentration of adsorbates, as shown in this work, can
432 > affect step-step interactions, potentially leading to a new
433 > surface structure as the thermodynamic equilibrium.
434  
435   \subsubsection{Double layers}
436 < Tao et al. have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
437 < undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
436 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
437 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.
438   The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
439 < Similar behavior has been seen to occur on numerous surfaces
440 < at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
439 > Similar behavior has been seen on a number of surfaces
440 > at varying conditions, including Ni(977) and Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
441   Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
442 < propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
443 < because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
444 < The amount of reconstruction is correlated to the amount of CO
442 > propensity for reconstruction  
443 > because of the larger surface mobility and the greater extent of step wandering.
444 > The amount of reconstruction was strongly correlated to the amount of CO
445   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
446   effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
447 < surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
448 < step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
449 < doubling seen by Tao et al. within the time scales studied here.
450 < Over longer periods (150~ns) two more double layers formed
451 < on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
452 < in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
449 < general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
447 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. Only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
448 > doubling seen by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
449 > Over a longer time scale (150~ns) two more double layers formed
450 > on this surface. Although double layer formation did not occur
451 > in the other Pt systems, they exhibited more step-wandering and
452 > roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
453   50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
454 < various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a step-edge.
454 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
455  
456 < The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
457 < Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
458 < across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
456 > The second reconstruction observed by
457 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
458 > across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither metal, within
459   the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
460   the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
461  
462 + %Evolution of surface
463 + \begin{figure}[H]
464 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation}
465 + \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
466 +  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
467 +  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
468 +  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
469 +  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
470 +  step observed in the later configurations.}
471 +  \label{fig:reconstruct}
472 + \end{figure}
473 +
474   \subsection{Dynamics}
475 < Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
476 < with the energetics and structures at different conditions
477 < \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
478 < technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo gives an efficient
479 < sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
480 < of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
481 < Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
482 < of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
468 < $\sim$70 s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
469 < the doubling to occur. In this section we give data on dynamic and
470 < transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
475 > Previous experimental work by Pearl and Sibener\cite{Pearl},
476 > using STM, has been able to capture the coalescence of steps
477 > on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition, $\sim$70~s/image,
478 > provides an upper bound for the time required for the doubling
479 > to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we are able to probe
480 > the dynamics of these reconstructions at elevated temperatures
481 > and in this section we provide data on the timescales for transport
482 > properties, e.g. diffusion and layer formation time.
483  
484  
485   \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
486   %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
487 < The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
487 > The wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
488   arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
489   displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
490   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
491   be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
492 < on higher-index facets provide a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
493 < Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
494 < energetic penalty around $\sim$~40 kcal/mol, but this is significantly easier than lifting
492 > on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
493 > Single-atom break-away from a step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
494 > energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
495   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
496   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
497 < on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, the penalty can fall as low as
497 > on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Discussion, the penalty can fall to as low as
498   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
499 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are
500 < able to explore the terrace before rejoining either the original step-edge or
501 < becoming a part of a different edge. It is a more difficult process for an atom
499 > diffusion is negligible (\textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
500 > able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
501 > becoming a part of a different edge. It is an energetically unfavorable process with a high barrier for an atom
502   to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
503 < energy barrier required to lift or lower the adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
503 > energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
504   metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
505   diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
506   observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
507 < equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
507 > equilibrium with the step-edges.
508   At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
509   observed moving together across the surfaces.
510  
511   A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
512 < between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
513 < truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
512 > between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). A mobile atom
513 > would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
514   was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
515   movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
516   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
517 < step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be different
518 < from the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
517 > step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
518 > the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
519   diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
520  
521 < The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data is likely due
510 < to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower
511 < coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
512 < then further limits the affects of the surface diffusion. The correlation
513 < between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
514 < definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
515 < explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
516 < the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
517 < stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms. By
518 < performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
519 < (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer,
520 < provides a $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ diffusion constant of $1.69~\pm~0.08$
521 < and a $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ diffusion constant of $6.30~\pm~0.08$.
522 < This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
523 < expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
524 < drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
525 < mechanism of double layer formation show the affect that CO on the
526 < surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
527 < coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
528 < thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
529 < arrangements of CO on the surface allowing the formation of a path,
530 < a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
531 < As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
532 < changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
533 < potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
534 < their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
535 <
536 < \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
537 < The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
538 < CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
539 < a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
540 < has higher diffusion constants but did not show
541 < any signs of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
542 < 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time, while two more were formed as the system was run for an additional
543 < 110~ns (150~ns total). Previous experimental
544 < work gives insight into the upper bounds of the
545 < time required for step coalescence.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
546 < In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
547 < appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
548 < into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
549 < formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
550 < has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
551 < ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
552 < appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
553 < $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
554 < The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
555 < 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper
556 < bounds of the image scan, it is likely that most aspects of this
557 < reconstruction occur very rapidly. A possible explanation
558 < for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
559 < under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
560 < take longer at lower temperatures.
561 <
562 < %Evolution of surface
563 < \begin{figure}[H]
564 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
565 < \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
566 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
567 <  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
568 <  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
569 <  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
570 <  step observed in the later configurations.}
571 <  \label{fig:reconstruct}
572 < \end{figure}
573 <
521 > %Diffusion graph
522   \begin{figure}[H]
523 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
523 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1}
524   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
525    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
526    ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
527    surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
528    than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
529    barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
530 <  completely breaking away. Additionally, the observed
531 <  maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
532 <  CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
533 <  movement of the Pt atoms around and across the surface. }
530 >  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
531 >  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
532 >  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
533 >  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
534   \label{fig:diff}
535   \end{figure}
536  
537 + The weaker Au-CO interaction is evident in the weak CO-coverage
538 + dependance of Au diffusion. This weak interaction leads to lower
539 + observed coverages when compared to dosage amounts. This further
540 + limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
541 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates shows a near linear relationship
542 + at the earliest times in the simulations. Following double layer formation,
543 + however, there is a precipitous drop in adatom diffusion. As the double
544 + layer forms, many atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have
545 + now been buried resulting in a smaller reported diffusion constant. A
546 + secondary effect of higher coverages is CO-CO cross interactions that
547 + lower the effective mobility of the Pt adatoms that are bound to each CO.
548 + This effect would become evident only at higher coverages. A detailed
549 + account of Pt adatom energetics follows in the Discussion.
550 +
551  
552 + \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
553 + The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages is the primary
554 + contributor to double layer formation. However, this is not a complete
555 + explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system has higher diffusion constants, but
556 + did not show any signs of edge doubling in 40~ns. On the 50\%~Pt
557 + system, one double layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time,
558 + while two more were formed as the system was allowed to run for an
559 + additional 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction
560 + is a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound is a
561 + very large overestimate.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl} In this system the first
562 + appearance of a double layer appears at 19~ns into the simulation.
563 + Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has formed
564 + the double layer and by 86~ns the complete layer has flattened out.
565 + From the appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed
566 + double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another $\sim$40~ns was
567 + necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in
568 + this simulation formed over periods of 22~ns and 42~ns respectively.
569 + A possible explanation for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated
570 + temperatures under which our systems were simulated. The process
571 + would almost certainly take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally,
572 + our measured times for completion of the doubling after the appearance
573 + of a nucleation site are likely affected by our periodic boxes. A longer
574 + step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''.
575  
576  
577   %Discussion
578   \section{Discussion}
579 < We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
580 < Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
581 < were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
579 > We have shown that a classical potential is able to model the initial
580 > reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption, and have
581 > reproduced the double layer structure observed by Tao {\it et
582 >  al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. Additionally, this reconstruction appears to be
583 > rapid -- occurring within 100 ns of the initial exposure to CO.  Here
584 > we discuss the features of the classical potential that are
585 > contributing to the stability and speed of the Pt(557) reconstruction.
586  
587 + \subsection{Diffusion}
588 + The perpendicular diffusion constant appears to be the most important
589 + indicator of double layer formation. As highlighted in Figure
590 + \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the formation of the double layer did not begin
591 + until a nucleation site appeared.  Williams {\it et
592 +  al}.\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} cite an effective edge-edge
593 + repulsion arising from the inability of edge crossing.  This repulsion
594 + must be overcome to allow step coalescence.  A larger
595 + $\textbf{D}_\perp$ value implies more step-wandering and a larger
596 + chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges to create a nucleation
597 + point.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a
598 + nascent double layer. This helps explain the rapid time scale for
599 + double layer completion after the appearance of a nucleation site, while
600 + the initial appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
601 +
602   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
603 < Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
604 < our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
605 < which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
606 < Similarities of our results to those reported previously by
607 < Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} are quite
608 < strong. The simulated Pt
609 < system exposed to a large dosage of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace
610 < widths and step heights. The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a time, but is rapid on experimental timescales.
611 < The adatoms either
612 < break away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift
613 < up onto a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace
614 < until reaching another step-edge or rejoining their original edge.  
615 < This combination of growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of
616 < dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges
617 < meet as shown in Figure 1.B, this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
618 < From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
603 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of our
604 > simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system which
605 > did exhibit doubling. A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain
606 > the role of adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar
607 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
608 > possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
609 > short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
610 > molecules are ``locked'' in a vertical orientation, through atop
611 > adsorption for example, this explanation would gain credence. The
612 > calculated energetic repulsion between two CO molecules located a
613 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both
614 > in a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the
615 > second nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to
616 > nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical
617 > orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the carbons are locked at
618 > a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached when the
619 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.  The calculated
620 > barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
621 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the
622 > surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests
623 > that the CO molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40
624 > to 2500 times larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests
625 > that the CO molecules jump between different Pt atoms throughout the
626 > simulation, but can stay bound for significant periods of time.
627  
628 < A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
629 < CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
630 < CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  However,
631 < the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
632 < some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
633 < relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
634 < gains some credence.  The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
635 < distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
636 < a  vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
637 < nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
638 < nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO's to leave a purely vertical orientation
639 < also quickly drops the repulsion, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at $\sim$24 degrees between the 2 CO when the carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart.
640 < As mentioned above, the energy barrier for surface diffusion
641 < of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between neighboring CO molecules can
642 < increase the surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt was
643 < examined and while the majority of the CO is on or near the surface throughout
644 < the run, most molecules are mobile. This mobility suggests that the CO are more
645 < likely to shift their positions without necessarily the Pt along with them.
628 > A different interpretation of the above mechanism which takes the
629 > large mobility of the CO into account, would be in the destabilization
630 > of Pt-Pt interactions due to bound CO.  Destabilizing Pt-Pt bonds at
631 > the edges could lead to increased step-edge breakup and diffusion. On
632 > the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach an edge atom
633 > is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
634 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain
635 > configurations, cases (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to
636 > $\sim$23~kcal/mol by the presence of bound CO molecules. In these
637 > instances, it becomes energetically favorable to roughen the edge by
638 > introducing a small separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening
639 > becomes immediately obvious in simulations with significant CO
640 > populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent on surfaces
641 > with lower CO coverage (and even on the bare surfaces), although in
642 > these cases it is likely due to random fluctuations that squeeze out
643 > step-edge atoms. Step-edge breakup by continuous single-atom
644 > translations (as suggested by these energy curves) is probably a
645 > worst-case scenario.  Multistep mechanisms in which an adatom moves
646 > laterally on the surface after being ejected would be more
647 > energetically favorable.  This would leave the adatom alongside the
648 > ledge, providing it with 5 nearest neighbors.  While fewer than the 7
649 > neighbors it had as part of the step-edge, it keeps more Pt neighbors
650 > than the 3 an isolated adatom would have on the terrace. In this
651 > proposed mechanism, the CO quadrupolar repulsion still plays a role in
652 > the initial roughening of the step-edge, but not in any long-term
653 > bonds with individual Pt atoms.  Higher CO coverages create more
654 > opportunities for the crowded CO configurations shown in Figure
655 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and this is likely to cause an increased
656 > propensity for step-edge breakup.
657  
658 < Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
659 < destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
660 < Pt atoms.  This would then have the effect of increasing surface mobility
661 < of these atoms.  To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
662 < CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
663 < around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. One representative
664 < configuration is displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}. Single or concerted movement
665 < of Pt atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
666 < the movement was forced along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
667 < from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
668 < are displayed in Table \ref{tab:energies} with the corresponding beginning and ending reaction coordinates in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}. These values suggest that the presence of CO at suitable
669 < locations can lead to lowered barriers for Pt breaking apart from the step-edge.
670 < Additionally, as highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
671 < burrowing and lifting of adatoms favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
649 < in terms of energetics.
658 > %Sketch graphic of different configurations
659 > \begin{figure}[H]
660 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{COpaths}
661 > \caption{Configurations used to investigate the mechanism of step-edge
662 >  breakup on Pt(557). In each case, the central (starred) atom is
663 >  pulled directly across the surface away from the step edge.  The Pt
664 >  atoms on the upper terrace are colored dark grey, while those on the
665 >  lower terrace are in white.  In each of these configurations, some
666 >  number of the atoms (highlighted in blue) had a CO molecule bound in
667 >  a vertical atop position.  The energies of these configurations as a
668 >  function of central atom displacement are displayed in Figure
669 >  \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
670 > \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
671 > \end{figure}
672  
673 < %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
673 > %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
674   \begin{figure}[H]
675 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
676 < \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
677 < for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
678 < placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
679 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run. As shown
680 < in Table \ref{tab:rxcoord}, relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
681 < is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
682 < with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
683 < \label{fig:lambda}
675 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison}
676 > \caption{Energies for displacing a single edge atom perpendicular to
677 >  the step edge as a function of atomic displacement. Each of the
678 >  energy curves corresponds to one of the labeled configurations in
679 >  Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and are referenced to the
680 >  unperturbed step-edge.  Certain arrangements of bound CO (notably
681 >  configurations g and h) can lower the energetic barrier for creating
682 >  an adatom relative to the bare surface (configuration a).}
683 > \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
684   \end{figure}
685  
686 + While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase
687 + diffusion and the likelihood of edge wandering, this does not provide
688 + a complete explanation for the formation of double layers. If adatoms
689 + were constrained to their original terraces then doubling could not
690 + occur.  A mechanism for vertical displacement of adatoms at the
691 + step-edge is required to explain the doubling.
692 +
693 + We have discovered one possible mechanism for a CO-mediated vertical
694 + displacement of Pt atoms at the step edge. Figure \ref{fig:lambda}
695 + shows four points along a reaction coordinate in which a CO-bound
696 + adatom along the step-edge ``burrows'' into the edge and displaces the
697 + original edge atom onto the higher terrace. A number of events similar
698 + to this mechanism were observed during the simulations.  We predict an
699 + energetic barrier of 20~kcal/mol for this process (in which the
700 + displaced edge atom follows a curvilinear path into an adjacent 3-fold
701 + hollow site).  The barrier heights we obtain for this reaction
702 + coordinate are approximate because the exact path is unknown, but the
703 + calculated energy barriers would be easily accessible at operating
704 + conditions.  Additionally, this mechanism is exothermic, with a final
705 + energy 15~kcal/mol below the original $\lambda = 0$ configuration.
706 + When CO is not present and this reaction coordinate is followed, the
707 + process is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol.  The difference in the relative
708 + energies for the $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=1$ case when CO is present
709 + provides strong support for CO-mediated Pt-Pt interactions giving rise
710 + to the doubling reconstruction.
711 +
712 + %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
713   \begin{figure}[H]
714 < \includegraphics[totalheight=0.9\textheight]{lambdaTable.png}
715 < \caption{}
716 < \label{fig:lambdaTable}
714 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord}
715 > \caption{Points along a possible reaction coordinate for CO-mediated
716 >  edge doubling. Here, a CO-bound adatom burrows into an established
717 >  step edge and displaces an edge atom onto the upper terrace along a
718 >  curvilinear path.  The approximate barrier for the process is
719 >  20~kcal/mol, and the complete process is exothermic by 15~kcal/mol
720 >  in the presence of CO, but is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol without.}
721 > \label{fig:lambda}
722   \end{figure}
723  
724 + The mechanism for doubling on the Pt(557) surface appears to require
725 + the cooperation of at least two distinct processes. For complete
726 + doubling of a layer to occur there must be a breakup of one
727 + terrace. These atoms must then ``disappear'' from that terrace, either
728 + by travelling to the terraces above of below their original levels.
729 + The presence of CO helps explain mechanisms for both of these
730 + situations. There must be sufficient breakage of the step-edge to
731 + increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and these adatoms
732 + must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above (or a comparable
733 + mechanism) to create the double layer.  With sufficient time, these
734 + mechanisms working in concert lead to the formation of a double layer.
735  
736 < \subsection{Diffusion}
737 < The diffusion parallel to the step-edge tends to be
738 < much larger than that perpendicular to the step-edge. The dynamic
739 < equilibrium that is established between the step-edge and adatom interface. The coverage
740 < of CO also appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
741 < The
742 < Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation
743 < of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it
679 < appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step-edge, will allow for
680 < a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on
681 < only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the
682 < more likely a growth point is to be formed.
683 < \\
736 > \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
737 > Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system, it remained for
738 > the rest of the simulation time with minimal movement.  Random
739 > fluctuations that involved small clusters or divots were observed, but
740 > these features typically healed within a few nanoseconds.  Within our
741 > simulations, the formation of the double layer appeared to be
742 > irreversible and a double layer was never observed to split back into
743 > two single layer step-edges while CO was present.
744  
745 + To further gauge the effect CO has on this surface, additional
746 + simulations were run starting from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt
747 + system that had already formed double layers. These simulations then
748 + had their CO forcibly removed.  The double layer broke apart rapidly
749 + in these simulations, showing a well-defined edge-splitting after
750 + 100~ps. Configurations of this system are shown in Figure
751 + \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring of the top and bottom layers helps to
752 + exhibit how much mixing the edges experience as they split. These
753 + systems were only examined for 10~ns, and within that time despite the
754 + initial rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few
755 + \AA~apart. It is possible that with longer simulation times, the (557)
756 + surface recovery observed by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} could
757 + also be recovered.
758  
759   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
760   \begin{figure}[H]
761 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
762 < \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
763 < helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
764 < and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
765 < there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
761 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking}
762 > \caption{Dynamics of an established (111) double step after removal of
763 >  the adsorbed CO: (A) 0~ps, (B) 100~ps, and (C) 1~ns after the removal
764 >  of CO. The presence of the CO helped maintain the stability of the
765 >  double step.  Nearly immediately after the CO is removed, the step
766 >  edge reforms in a (100) configuration, which is also the step type
767 >  seen on clean (557) surfaces. The step separation involves
768 >  significant mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
769   \label{fig:breaking}
770   \end{figure}
771  
772  
697
698
773   %Peaks!
774   %\begin{figure}[H]
775   %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
# Line 709 | Line 783 | more likely a growth point is to be formed.
783   %Don't think I need this
784   %clean surface...
785   %\begin{figure}[H]
786 < %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
786 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF}
787   %\caption{}
788  
789   %\end{figure}
# Line 717 | Line 791 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
791  
792  
793   \section{Conclusion}
794 < In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
794 > The strength and directionality of the Pt-CO binding interaction, as
795 > well as the large quadrupolar repulsion between atop-bound CO
796 > molecules, help to explain the observed increase in surface mobility
797 > of Pt(557) and the resultant reconstruction into a double-layer
798 > configuration at the highest simulated CO-coverages.  The weaker Au-CO
799 > interaction results in significantly lower adataom diffusion
800 > constants, less step-wandering, and a lack of the double layer
801 > reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
802  
803 + An in-depth examination of the energetics shows the important role CO
804 + plays in increasing step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal
805 + which are both necessary for double layer formation.
806 +
807   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
808  
809   %Table of Diffusion Constants
# Line 741 | Line 826 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
826   % \end{tabular}
827   % \end{table}
828  
829 < \section{Acknowledgments}
830 < Support for this project was provided by the National Science
831 < Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
832 < Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
833 < Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
834 <
829 > \begin{acknowledgement}
830 >  We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. William
831 >  F. Schneider and Dr. Feng Tao.  Support for this project was
832 >  provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243
833 >  and by the Center for Sustainable Energy at Notre Dame
834 >  (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
835 >  Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
836 > \end{acknowledgement}
837   \newpage
838   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
839 < \end{doublespace}
839 > %\end{doublespace}
840 >
841 > \begin{tocentry}
842 > %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
843 > \includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{TOC_doubleLayer.pdf}
844 > \end{tocentry}
845 >
846   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines