ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3881 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 19 18:08:24 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3884 by jmichalk, Tue Mar 19 21:43:34 2013 UTC

# Line 20 | Line 20
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22   \usepackage{multicol}
23 < \usepackage{epstopdf}
23 > \mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
24 > %\usepackage{epstopdf}
25  
26   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
27   % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
# Line 74 | Line 75 | We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) u
75  
76  
77   \begin{abstract}
78 < We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
79 < various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
80 < explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
81 < and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
82 < as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
83 < this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
84 < strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
85 < role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
86 < small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
87 < was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
88 < is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
89 < systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
89 <
90 <
91 < The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557)
92 < and Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO)
93 < were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
94 < interactions were parameterized from experimental data and plane-wave
95 < Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large difference in
96 < binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions was found to play
97 < a significant role in step-edge stability and adatom diffusion constants.
98 < The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface is sufficient to explain the
99 < step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and the lack of such
100 < a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
78 >  The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557) and
79 >  Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO) were
80 >  investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
81 >  interactions were parameterized from experimental data and
82 >  plane-wave Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large
83 >  difference in binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions
84 >  was found to play a significant role in step-edge stability and
85 >  adatom diffusion constants.  Various mechanisms for CO-mediated step
86 >  wandering and step doubling were investigated on the Pt(557)
87 >  surface.  We find that the energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
88 >  can explain the step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and
89 >  the lack of such a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
90   \end{abstract}
91  
92   \newpage
# Line 400 | Line 389 | source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,
389   data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
390   data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
391   systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
392 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
392 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,openmd}
393  
394  
395  
# Line 472 | Line 461 | the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
461  
462   %Evolution of surface
463   \begin{figure}[H]
464 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation.pdf}
464 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation}
465   \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
466    initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
467    (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
# Line 531 | Line 520 | diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}
520  
521   %Diffusion graph
522   \begin{figure}[H]
523 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1.pdf}
523 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1}
524   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
525    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
526    ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
# Line 587 | Line 576 | We have shown that a classical potential model is able
576  
577   %Discussion
578   \section{Discussion}
579 < We have shown that a classical potential model is able to model the
580 < initial reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as
581 < shown by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we were
582 < able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for
583 < this reconstruction. Here we discuss the features of the model that
584 < give rise to the observed dynamical properties of the (557) reconstruction.
579 > We have shown that a classical potential is able to model the initial
580 > reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption, and have
581 > reproduced the double layer structure observed by Tao {\it et
582 >  al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. Additionally, this reconstruction appears to be
583 > rapid -- occurring within 100 ns of the initial exposure to CO.  Here
584 > we discuss the features of the classical potential that are
585 > contributing to the stability and speed of the Pt(557) reconstruction.
586  
587   \subsection{Diffusion}
588 < The perpendicular diffusion constant
589 < appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
590 < formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
591 < formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
592 < site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams {\it et al}.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
593 < the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective edge-edge repulsion that
594 < must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
595 < A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
596 < and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
597 < to create a nucleation point. Parallel diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a nascent double
598 < layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
599 < the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
600 < appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
588 > The perpendicular diffusion constant appears to be the most important
589 > indicator of double layer formation. As highlighted in Figure
590 > \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the formation of the double layer did not begin
591 > until a nucleation site appeared.  Williams {\it et
592 >  al}.\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} cite an effective edge-edge
593 > repulsion arising from the inability of edge crossing.  This repulsion
594 > must be overcome to allow step coalescence.  A larger
595 > $\textbf{D}_\perp$ value implies more step-wandering and a larger
596 > chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges to create a nucleation
597 > point.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a
598 > nascent double layer. This helps explain the rapid time scale for
599 > double layer completion after the appearance of a nucleation site, while
600 > the initial appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
601  
602   \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
603 < Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of
604 < our simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
605 < which did exhibit doubling. A
606 < number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
607 < CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between
608 < adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  
609 < However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and
610 < is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in
611 < a specific orientation relative to each other, through atop adsorption for
612 < example, this explanation would gain credence. The calculated energetic repulsion
613 < between two CO molecules located a distance of 2.77~\AA~apart
614 < (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in a vertical orientation,
615 < is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the second nearest-neighbor distance
616 < of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away
617 < from a purely vertical orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the
618 < carbons are locked at a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is
619 < reached when the angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.
620 < The calculated barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
621 < repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the surface
622 < diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests that these
623 < molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times
624 < larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests that the CO molecules jump
625 < between different Pt atoms throughout the simulation, but will stay bound for
626 < significant periods of time.
603 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of our
604 > simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system which
605 > did exhibit doubling. A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain
606 > the role of adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar
607 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
608 > possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
609 > short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
610 > molecules are ``locked'' in a vertical orientation, through atop
611 > adsorption for example, this explanation would gain credence. The
612 > calculated energetic repulsion between two CO molecules located a
613 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both
614 > in a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the
615 > second nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to
616 > nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical
617 > orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the carbons are locked at
618 > a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached when the
619 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.  The calculated
620 > barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
621 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the
622 > surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests
623 > that the CO molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40
624 > to 2500 times larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests
625 > that the CO molecules jump between different Pt atoms throughout the
626 > simulation, but can stay bound for significant periods of time.
627  
628 < A different interpretation of the above mechanism, taking into account the large
629 < mobility of the CO, looks at how instantaneous and short-lived configurations of
630 < CO on the surface can destabilize Pt-Pt interactions leading to increased step-edge
631 < breakup and diffusion. On the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach
632 < an edge atom is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
633 < \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain configurations, cases
634 < (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to $\sim$23~kcal/mole. In these instances,
635 < it becomes quite energetically favorable to roughen the edge by introducing a small
636 < separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening becomes immediately obvious in
637 < simulations with significant CO populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent
638 < on lower coverage surfaces and even on the bare surfaces, although in these cases it is likely
639 < due to stochastic vibrational processes that squeeze out step-edge atoms. The mechanism
640 < of step-edge breakup suggested by these energy curves is one of the most difficult
641 < processes, a complete break-away from the step-edge in one unbroken movement.
642 < Easier multistep mechanisms likely exist where an adatom moves laterally on the surface
643 < after being ejected so it ends up alongside the ledge. This provides the atom with 5 nearest
644 < neighbors, which while lower than the 7 if it had stayed a part of the step-edge, is higher
645 < than the 3 it could maintain located on the terrace. In this proposed mechanism, the CO
646 < quadrupolar repulsion is still playing a primary role, but for its importance in roughening
647 < the step-edge, rather than maintaining long-term bonds with a single Pt atom which is not
648 < born out by their mobility data. The requirement for a large density of CO on the surface
649 < for some of the more favorable suggested configurations in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}
650 < correspond well with the increased mobility seen on higher coverage surfaces.
628 > A different interpretation of the above mechanism which takes the
629 > large mobility of the CO into account, would be in the destabilization
630 > of Pt-Pt interactions due to bound CO.  Destabilizing Pt-Pt bonds at
631 > the edges could lead to increased step-edge breakup and diffusion. On
632 > the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach an edge atom
633 > is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
634 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain
635 > configurations, cases (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to
636 > $\sim$23~kcal/mol by the presence of bound CO molecules. In these
637 > instances, it becomes energetically favorable to roughen the edge by
638 > introducing a small separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening
639 > becomes immediately obvious in simulations with significant CO
640 > populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent on surfaces
641 > with lower CO coverage (and even on the bare surfaces), although in
642 > these cases it is likely due to random fluctuations that squeeze out
643 > step-edge atoms. Step-edge breakup by continuous single-atom
644 > translations (as suggested by these energy curves) is probably a
645 > worst-case scenario.  Multistep mechanisms in which an adatom moves
646 > laterally on the surface after being ejected would be more
647 > energetically favorable.  This would leave the adatom alongside the
648 > ledge, providing it with 5 nearest neighbors.  While fewer than the 7
649 > neighbors it had as part of the step-edge, it keeps more Pt neighbors
650 > than the 3 an isolated adatom would have on the terrace. In this
651 > proposed mechanism, the CO quadrupolar repulsion still plays a role in
652 > the initial roughening of the step-edge, but not in any long-term
653 > bonds with individual Pt atoms.  Higher CO coverages create more
654 > opportunities for the crowded CO configurations shown in Figure
655 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and this is likely to cause an increased
656 > propensity for step-edge breakup.
657  
658   %Sketch graphic of different configurations
659   \begin{figure}[H]
660 < \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
661 < \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
662 < the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
663 < upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
664 < complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
665 < Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
660 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{COpaths}
661 > \caption{Configurations used to investigate the mechanism of step-edge
662 >  breakup on Pt(557). In each case, the central (starred) atom is
663 >  pulled directly across the surface away from the step edge.  The Pt
664 >  atoms on the upper terrace are colored dark grey, while those on the
665 >  lower terrace are in white.  In each of these configurations, some
666 >  number of the atoms (highlighted in blue) had a CO molecule bound in
667 >  a vertical atop position.  The energies of these configurations as a
668 >  function of central atom displacement are displayed in Figure
669 >  \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
670   \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
671   \end{figure}
672  
673   %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
674   \begin{figure}[H]
675 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison.pdf}
676 < \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
677 < surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
678 < to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
679 < same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
680 < the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
681 < However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
682 < configurations of CO will be more likely. }
675 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison}
676 > \caption{Energies for displacing a single edge atom perpendicular to
677 >  the step edge as a function of atomic displacement. Each of the
678 >  energy curves corresponds to one of the labeled configurations in
679 >  Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and are referenced to the
680 >  unperturbed step-edge.  Certain arrangements of bound CO (notably
681 >  configurations g and h) can lower the energetic barrier for creating
682 >  an adatom relative to the bare surface (configuration a).}
683   \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
684   \end{figure}
685  
686 < While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase diffusion,
687 < this does not immediately provide an explanation for the formation of double
688 < layers. If adatoms were constrained to their terrace then doubling would be
689 < much less likely to occur. Nucleation sites could still potentially form, but there
690 < would not be enough atoms to finish the doubling. For a non-simulated metal surface, where the
691 < step lengths can be assumed to be infinite relative to atomic sizes, local doubling would be possible, but in
692 < our simulations with our periodic treatment of the system, the system is not large enough to experience this effect.
693 < Thus, there must be a mechanism that explains how adatoms are able to move
694 < amongst terraces. Figure \ref{fig:lambda} shows points along a reaction coordinate
695 < where an adatom along the step-edge with an adsorbed CO ``burrows'' into the
696 < edge displacing an atom onto the higher terrace. This mechanism was chosen
697 < because of similar events that were observed during the simulations. The barrier
698 < heights we obtained are only approximations because we constrained the movement
699 < of the highlighted atoms along a specific concerted path. The calculated $\Delta E$'s
700 < are provide a strong energetic support for this modeled lifting mechanism. When CO is not present and
701 < this reaction coordinate is followed, the $\Delta E > 3$~kcal/mol. The example shown
702 < in the figure, where CO is present in the atop position, has a $\Delta E < -15$~kcal/mol.
703 < While the barrier height is comparable for both cases, there is nearly a 20~kcal/mol
704 < difference in energies and makes the process energetically favorable.
686 > While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase
687 > diffusion and the likelihood of edge wandering, this does not provide
688 > a complete explanation for the formation of double layers. If adatoms
689 > were constrained to their original terraces then doubling could not
690 > occur.  A mechanism for vertical displacement of adatoms at the
691 > step-edge is required to explain the doubling.
692  
693 + We have discovered one possible mechanism for a CO-mediated vertical
694 + displacement of Pt atoms at the step edge. Figure \ref{fig:lambda}
695 + shows four points along a reaction coordinate in which a CO-bound
696 + adatom along the step-edge ``burrows'' into the edge and displaces the
697 + original edge atom onto the higher terrace. A number of events similar
698 + to this mechanism were observed during the simulations.  We predict an
699 + energetic barrier of 20~kcal/mol for this process (in which the
700 + displaced edge atom follows a curvilinear path into an adjacent 3-fold
701 + hollow site).  The barrier heights we obtain for this reaction
702 + coordinate are approximate because the exact path is unknown, but the
703 + calculated energy barriers would be easily accessible at operating
704 + conditions.  Additionally, this mechanism is exothermic, with a final
705 + energy 15~kcal/mol below the original $\lambda = 0$ configuration.
706 + When CO is not present and this reaction coordinate is followed, the
707 + process is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol.  The difference in the relative
708 + energies for the $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=1$ case when CO is present
709 + provides strong support for CO-mediated Pt-Pt interactions giving rise
710 + to the doubling reconstruction.
711 +
712   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
713   \begin{figure}[H]
714 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord.pdf}
715 < \caption{ Various points along a reaction coordinate are displayed in the figure.
716 < The mechanism of edge traversal is examined in the presence of CO. The approximate
717 < barrier for the displayed process is 20~kcal/mol. However, the $\Delta E$ of this process
718 < is -15~kcal/mol making it an energetically favorable process.}
714 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord}
715 > \caption{Points along a possible reaction coordinate for CO-mediated
716 >  edge doubling. Here, a CO-bound adatom burrows into an established
717 >  step edge and displaces an edge atom onto the upper terrace along a
718 >  curvilinear path.  The approximate barrier for the process is
719 >  20~kcal/mol, and the complete process is exothermic by 15~kcal/mol
720 >  in the presence of CO, but is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol without.}
721   \label{fig:lambda}
722   \end{figure}
723  
724 < The mechanism for doubling on this surface appears to require the cooperation of at least
725 < these two described processes. For complete doubling of a layer to occur there must
726 < be the equivalent removal of a separate terrace. For those atoms to ``disappear'' from
727 < that terrace they must either rise up on the ledge above them or drop to the ledge below
728 < them. The presence of CO helps with the energetics of both of these situations. There must be sufficient
729 < breakage of the step-edge to increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and
730 < these adatoms must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above or some comparable
731 < mechanism to traverse the step-edge. Over time, these mechanisms working in concert
732 < lead to the formation of a double layer.
724 > The mechanism for doubling on the Pt(557) surface appears to require
725 > the cooperation of at least two distinct processes. For complete
726 > doubling of a layer to occur there must be a breakup of one
727 > terrace. These atoms must then ``disappear'' from that terrace, either
728 > by travelling to the terraces above of below their original levels.
729 > The presence of CO helps explain mechanisms for both of these
730 > situations. There must be sufficient breakage of the step-edge to
731 > increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and these adatoms
732 > must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above (or a comparable
733 > mechanism) to create the double layer.  With sufficient time, these
734 > mechanisms working in concert lead to the formation of a double layer.
735  
736   \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
737 < Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system it
738 < remained for the rest of the simulation time with minimal
739 < movement. There were configurations that showed small
740 < wells or peaks forming, but typically within a few nanoseconds
741 < the feature would smooth away. Within our simulation time,
742 < the formation of the double layer was irreversible and a double
743 < layer was never observed to split back into two single layer
734 < step-edges while CO was present. To further gauge the effect
735 < CO had on this system, additional simulations were run starting
736 < from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt system that had formed
737 < double layers. These simulations then had their CO removed.
738 < The double layer breaks rapidly in these simulations, already
739 < showing a well-defined splitting after 100~ps. Configurations of
740 < this system are shown in Figure \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring
741 < of the top and bottom layers helps to exhibit how much mixing
742 < the edges experience as they split. These systems were only
743 < examined briefly, 10~ns, and within that time despite the initial
744 < rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few \AA~apart.
745 < It is possible with longer simulation times that the
746 < (557) lattice could be recovered as seen by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}
737 > Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system, it remained for
738 > the rest of the simulation time with minimal movement.  Random
739 > fluctuations that involved small clusters or divots were observed, but
740 > these features typically healed within a few nanoseconds.  Within our
741 > simulations, the formation of the double layer appeared to be
742 > irreversible and a double layer was never observed to split back into
743 > two single layer step-edges while CO was present.
744  
745 + To further gauge the effect CO has on this surface, additional
746 + simulations were run starting from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt
747 + system that had already formed double layers. These simulations then
748 + had their CO forcibly removed.  The double layer broke apart rapidly
749 + in these simulations, showing a well-defined edge-splitting after
750 + 100~ps. Configurations of this system are shown in Figure
751 + \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring of the top and bottom layers helps to
752 + exhibit how much mixing the edges experience as they split. These
753 + systems were only examined for 10~ns, and within that time despite the
754 + initial rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few
755 + \AA~apart. It is possible that with longer simulation times, the (557)
756 + surface recovery observed by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} could
757 + also be recovered.
758  
749
759   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
760   \begin{figure}[H]
761 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking.pdf}
762 < \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
763 < helped maintain the stability of the double layer and its microfaceting of the double layer
764 < into a (111) configuration. This microfacet immediately reverts to the original (100) step
765 < edge which is a hallmark of the (557) surface. The separation is not a simple sliding apart, rather
766 < there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
761 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking}
762 > \caption{Dynamics of an established (111) double step after removal of
763 >  the adsorbed CO: (A) 0~ps, (B) 100~ps, and (C) 1~ns after the removal
764 >  of CO. The presence of the CO helped maintain the stability of the
765 >  double step.  Nearly immediately after the CO is removed, the step
766 >  edge reforms in a (100) configuration, which is also the step type
767 >  seen on clean (557) surfaces. The step separation involves
768 >  significant mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
769   \label{fig:breaking}
770   \end{figure}
771  
772  
762
763
773   %Peaks!
774   %\begin{figure}[H]
775   %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
# Line 774 | Line 783 | there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the
783   %Don't think I need this
784   %clean surface...
785   %\begin{figure}[H]
786 < %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
786 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF}
787   %\caption{}
788  
789   %\end{figure}
# Line 782 | Line 791 | The strength of the Pt-CO binding interaction as well
791  
792  
793   \section{Conclusion}
794 < The strength of the Pt-CO binding interaction as well as the large
795 < quadrupolar repulsion between CO molecules are sufficient to
796 < explain the observed increase in surface mobility and the resultant
797 < reconstructions at the highest simulated coverage. The weaker
798 < Au-CO interaction results in lower diffusion constants, less step-wandering,
799 < and a lack of the double layer reconstruction. An in-depth examination
800 < of the energetics shows the important role CO plays in increasing
801 < step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal which are both
793 < necessary for double layer formation.
794 > The strength and directionality of the Pt-CO binding interaction, as
795 > well as the large quadrupolar repulsion between atop-bound CO
796 > molecules, help to explain the observed increase in surface mobility
797 > of Pt(557) and the resultant reconstruction into a double-layer
798 > configuration at the highest simulated CO-coverages.  The weaker Au-CO
799 > interaction results in significantly lower adataom diffusion
800 > constants, less step-wandering, and a lack of the double layer
801 > reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
802  
803 + An in-depth examination of the energetics shows the important role CO
804 + plays in increasing step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal
805 + which are both necessary for double layer formation.
806  
796
807   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
808  
809   %Table of Diffusion Constants
# Line 817 | Line 827 | Support for this project was provided by the National
827   % \end{table}
828  
829   \begin{acknowledgement}
830 < Support for this project was provided by the National Science
831 < Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
832 < Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
833 < Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
830 >  We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. William
831 >  F. Schneider and Dr. Feng Tao.  Support for this project was
832 >  provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243
833 >  and by the Center for Sustainable Energy at Notre Dame
834 >  (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
835 >  Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
836   \end{acknowledgement}
837   \newpage
838   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
# Line 828 | Line 840 | Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University
840  
841   \begin{tocentry}
842   %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
843 + \includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{TOC_doubleLayer.pdf}
844   \end{tocentry}
845  
846   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines