ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3866 by jmichalk, Wed Feb 27 21:15:17 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3886 by jmichalk, Wed Mar 20 19:03:36 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[11pt]{article}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5 > \usepackage{float}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11   \usepackage{amsmath}
12   \usepackage{amssymb}
13   \usepackage{times}
# Line 6 | Line 15
15   \usepackage{setspace}
16   \usepackage{endfloat}
17   \usepackage{caption}
18 < %\usepackage{tabularx}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22 < %\usepackage{booktabs}
23 < %\usepackage{bibentry}
24 < %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
25 < \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23 > \usepackage{wrapfig}
24 > \mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
25 > %\usepackage{epstopdf}
26 >
27 > \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
28 > % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
29   \usepackage{url}
30   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
31   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
32 < 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
32 > 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=1110000
33  
34   % double space list of tables and figures
35   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
36   \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
37   \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
38 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
39  
40 < \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
41 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
40 > %\citestyle{nature}
41 > % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
42  
43 < \begin{document}
43 > \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
44 >  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
45  
46 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
47 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
48 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
49 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
50 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
51 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
52 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
53  
54 + \keywords{}
55 +
56 + \begin{document}
57 +
58 +
59   %%
60   %Introduction
61   %       Experimental observations
# Line 47 | Line 74
74   %Summary
75   %%
76  
50 %Title
51 \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
52  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
77  
54 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre and J. Daniel
55 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
56 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
57 University of Notre Dame\\
58 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
59
60 %Date
61 \date{Dec 15, 2012}
62
63 %authors
64
65 % make the title
66 \maketitle
67
68 \begin{doublespace}
69
78   \begin{abstract}
79 < We examine potential surface reconstructions of Pt and Au (557) under various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to find possible mechanisms and dynamics for the restructuring. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized as part of this work so that a large scale treatment of this system could be undertaken. The relative binding strengths of the metal-CO interactions were found to play a large role with regards to step edge stability and adatom diffusion. A small correlation between coverage and the size of the diffusion constant was also determined. These results appear sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt systems and the lack of reconstructions on the Au systems.
79 >  The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557) and
80 >  Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO) were
81 >  investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
82 >  interactions were parameterized from experimental data and
83 >  plane-wave Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large
84 >  difference in binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions
85 >  was found to play a significant role in step-edge stability and
86 >  adatom diffusion constants.  Various mechanisms for CO-mediated step
87 >  wandering and step doubling were investigated on the Pt(557)
88 >  surface.  We find that the energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
89 >  can explain the step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and
90 >  the lack of such a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
91   \end{abstract}
92  
93   \newpage
# Line 100 | Line 119 | This work is an attempt to understand the mechanism an
119   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
120   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
121  
122 < This work is an attempt to understand the mechanism and timescale for
122 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for the Pt(557) \& Au(557)
123   surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
124   of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
125   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
126   computational efficiency necessary to simulate the process of interest.
127 <
128 < Restructuring can occur as a result of specific interactions of the
110 < catalyst with adsorbates. In this work, two metal systems exposed
127 > Since restructuring typically occurs as a result of specific interactions of the
128 > catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
129   to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
130 < to reconstruct under certain conditions. The Au(557) surface, because
131 < of a weaker interaction with CO, is less likely to undergo this kind
132 < of reconstruction.  MORE HERE ON PT AND AU PREVIOUS WORK.
130 > to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
131 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is less
132 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters {\it et al}.\cite{Peters:2000}
133 > and Piccolo {\it et al}.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
134 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters {\it et al}. saw a relaxation to the
135 > 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
136 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction, while
137 > allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
138 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern on Au(111) being greatly
139 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo {\it et al}. on the other hand, did see a
140 > disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
141 > surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
142 > low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
143  
144 +
145 +
146   %Platinum molecular dynamics
147   %gold molecular dynamics
148  
149   \section{Simulation Methods}
150 < The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface problem is the
150 > The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface is the
151   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
152   model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
153   adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
154 < 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
154 > 10$^4$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
155   molecular dynamics
156   (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
157   methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
# Line 133 | Line 163 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}, while modeling
163   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
164   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
165   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
166 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}, while modeling the CO using a rigid
166 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{Foiles86} The CO was modeled using a rigid
167   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
168   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
169   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 146 | Line 176 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al
176   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
177   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
178   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
179 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al.} is among the
180 < fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
181 < all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
179 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88} is among the
180 > fastest of these density functional approaches. In
181 > all of these models, atoms are treated as a positively charged
182   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
183   calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
184   the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
# Line 179 | Line 209 | properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007
209   The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) potentials
210   have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
211   simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
212 < properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
212 > properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq,mishin99:_inter}
213   melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
214 < fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
215 < propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
216 < dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} All of these potentials have their
217 < strengths and weaknesses.  One of the strengths common to all of the
218 < methods is the relatively large library of metals for which these
219 < potentials have been
220 < parameterized.\cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
214 > fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx,mishin01:cu} crack
215 > propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg,Rifkin1992} and alloying
216 > dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni} One of EAM's strengths
217 > is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
218 > because interactions
219 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account in the parameterization.\cite{Voter95a}
220 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88}
221 > which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
222 > interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
223 > the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
224 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAM's functional
225 > treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
226 > theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
227  
228 +
229 +
230 +
231 +
232   \subsection{Carbon Monoxide model}
233   Previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
234 < the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide.  
234 > the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}  
235   We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
236   the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin because it reproduces
237   the quadrupole moment well.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
238 < Karplus model, treats CO as a rigid three site molecule which places a massless M
239 < site at the center of mass position along the CO bond.  The geometry used along
240 < with the interaction parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:CO}. The effective
238 > Karplus model treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
239 > site at the molecular center of mass. The geometry and interaction
240 > parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:CO}. The effective
241   dipole moment, calculated from the assigned charges, is still
242   small (0.35 D) while the linear quadrupole (-2.40 D~\AA) is close
243   to the experimental (-2.63 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO} and quantum
# Line 206 | Line 246 | mechanical predictions (-2.46 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO
246   \begin{table}[H]
247    \caption{Positions, Lennard-Jones parameters ($\sigma$ and
248      $\epsilon$), and charges for the CO-CO
249 <    interactions borrowed from Ref. \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are
249 >    interactions in Ref.\bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA, energies are
250      in kcal/mol, and charges are in atomic units.}
251   \centering
252   \begin{tabular}{| c | c | ccc |}
253   \hline
254   &  {\it z} & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & q\\
255   \hline
256 < \textbf{C} & -0.6457 &  0.0262  & 3.83   &   -0.75 \\
257 < \textbf{O} &  0.4843 &   0.1591 &   3.12 &   -0.85 \\
256 > \textbf{C} & -0.6457 &  3.83 & 0.0262   &   -0.75 \\
257 > \textbf{O} &  0.4843 &  3.12 &  0.1591  &   -0.85 \\
258   \textbf{M} & 0.0 & -  &  -  &    1.6 \\
259   \hline
260   \end{tabular}
# Line 223 | Line 263 | Since the adsorption of CO onto a platinum surface has
263  
264   \subsection{Cross-Interactions between the metals and carbon monoxide}
265  
266 < Since the adsorption of CO onto a platinum surface has been the focus
266 > Since the adsorption of CO onto a Pt surface has been the focus
267   of much experimental \cite{Yeo, Hopster:1978, Ertl:1977, Kelemen:1979}
268   and theoretical work
269   \cite{Beurden:2002ys,Pons:1986,Deshlahra:2009,Feibelman:2001,Mason:2004}
270   there is a significant amount of data on adsorption energies for CO on
271 < clean metal surfaces. Parameters reported by Korzeniewski {\it et
272 <  al.}\cite{Pons:1986} were a starting point for our fits, which were
271 > clean metal surfaces. An earlier model by Korzeniewski {\it et
272 >  al.}\cite{Pons:1986} served as a starting point for our fits. The parameters were
273   modified to ensure that the Pt-CO interaction favored the atop binding
274 < position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}
275 < This resulted in binding energies that are slightly higher
274 > position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
275 > The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
276   than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
277 < {\it et al.},\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
278 < Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
277 > {\it et al}.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
278 > Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged, partial
279   binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
280 < Pt-O interaction was parameterized to a Morse potential at a larger
281 < minimum distance, ($r_o$).  This was chosen so that the C would be preferred
282 < over O as the binder to the surface. In most cases, this parameterization contributes a weak
280 > Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
281 > equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
282 > over O as the surface-binding atom. In most geometries, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
283   repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
284   surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
285   (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
# Line 250 | Line 290 | The limited experimental data for CO adsorption on Au
290   %same cutoff for slab and slab + CO ? seems low, although feibelmen had values around there...
291   The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were also fit using Lennard-Jones and
292   Morse potentials, respectively, to reproduce Au-CO binding energies.
293 < The limited experimental data for CO adsorption on Au lead us to refine our fits against DFT.
293 > The limited experimental data for CO adsorption on Au required refining the fits against plane-wave DFT calculations.
294   Adsorption energies were obtained from gas-surface DFT calculations with a
295   periodic supercell plane-wave basis approach, as implemented in the
296 < {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores are
296 > {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores were
297   described with the projector augmented-wave (PAW)
298   method,\cite{PhysRevB.50.17953,PhysRevB.59.1758} with plane waves
299   included to an energy cutoff of 20 Ry. Electronic energies are
# Line 267 | Line 307 | zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxe
307   performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
308   was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
309   were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
310 < zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976,PhysRevB.13.5188} The relaxed gold slab was
310 > zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
311   then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
312   heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
313   empirical force field.
314  
315   %Hint at future work
316   The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
317 < are shown in Table~\ref{co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
318 < (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{co_energies}.  Charge transfer
319 < and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
320 < affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be added in
281 < a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire}
317 > are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
318 > (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
319 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects could have
320 > an effect on  binding energies and binding site preferences.
321  
322   %Table  of Parameters
323   %Pt Parameter Set 9
324   %Au Parameter Set 35
325   \begin{table}[H]
326 <  \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-CO cross-interactions.   Metal-C
327 <    interactions are modeled with Lennard-Jones potential, while the
328 <    (mostly-repulsive) metal-O interactions were fit to Morse
326 >  \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-CO cross-interactions. Metal-C
327 >    interactions are modeled with Lennard-Jones potentials. While the
328 >    metal-O interactions were fit to Morse
329      potentials.  Distances are given in \AA~and energies in kcal/mol. }
330   \centering
331   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | c | ccc |}
# Line 303 | Line 342 | a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire}
342  
343   %Table of energies
344   \begin{table}[H]
345 <  \caption{Adsorption energies for CO on M(111) using the potentials
346 <    described in this work.  All values are in eV}
345 >  \caption{Adsorption energies for a single CO at the atop site on M(111) at the atop site using the potentials
346 >    described in this work.  All values are in eV.}
347   \centering
348   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc |}
349    \hline
# Line 313 | Line 352 | a future work.\cite{Deshlahra:2012,StreitzMintmire}
352    \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
353    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
354   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
355 <  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPD_Gold}) \\
355 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
356    \hline
357   \end{tabular}
358   \label{tab:co_energies}
359   \end{table}
360  
361   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
362 <
363 < Our model systems are composed of 3888 Pt atoms and 3384 Au atoms in a
364 < FCC crystal that have been cut along the 557 plane so that they are
365 < periodic in the {\it x} and {\it y} directions, and have been rotated
366 < to expose two parallel 557 cuts along the positive and negative {\it
367 <  z}-axis.  Simulations of the bare metal interfaces at temperatures
368 < ranging from 300~K to 1200~K were done to observe the relative
362 > Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
363 > 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
364 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA. The metal slabs
365 > are 9 and 8 atoms deep respectively, corresponding to a slab
366 > thickness of $\sim$21~\AA~ for Pt and $\sim$19~\AA~for Au.
367 > The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
368 > along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
369 > {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
370 > (557) cuts along the extended {\it z}-axis.  Simulations of the
371 > bare metal interfaces at temperatures ranging from 300~K to
372 > 1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
373   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
374  
375 < The different bulk (and surface) melting temperatures (1337~K for Au
376 < and 2045~K for Pt) suggest that the reconstruction may happen at
377 < different temperatures for the two metals.  To copy experimental
335 < conditions for the CO-exposed surfaces, the bare surfaces were
375 > The different bulk melting temperatures predicted by EAM (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
376 > and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
377 > different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
378   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
379 < respectively for 100 ps.  Each surface was exposed to a range of CO
379 > respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
380 > temperatures when no CO was present, but experienced increased surface
381 > mobility on addition of CO. Each surface was then dosed with different concentrations of CO
382   that was initially placed in the vacuum region.  Upon full adsorption,
383 < these amounts correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
384 < coverage.  Because of the difference in binding energies, the platinum
385 < systems very rarely had CO that was not bound to the surface, while
386 < the gold surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
383 > these concentrations correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
384 > coverage. Higher coverages resulted in the formation of a double layer of CO,
385 > which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
386 > Because of the difference in binding energies, nearly all of the CO was bound to the Pt surface, while
387 > the Au surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
388   phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (over
389 < 5 ns) before being shifted to the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
390 < data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40 ns in the
391 < data collection stage, although simulation times for some of the
392 < systems exceeded 200ns.  All simulations were run using the open
393 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,OpenMD}
389 > 5~ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
390 > data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
391 > data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
392 > systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
393 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,openmd}
394  
395 < % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
396 < % structure
397 < %       Pt: step wandering, double layers, no triangular motifs
398 < %       Au: step wandering, no double layers
399 < % dynamics
355 < %       diffusion
356 < %       time scale, formation, breakage
395 >
396 >
397 >
398 > % RESULTS
399 > %
400   \section{Results}
401   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
402 < Tao {\it et al.} showed experimentally that the Pt(557) surface undergoes
403 < two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010} The first
404 < reconstruction involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length. Similar
405 < behavior has been seen to occur on numerous surfaces at varying conditions.\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
406 < Of the two systems we examined, the Platinum system showed the most surface
407 < reconstruction. Additionally, the amount of reconstruction appears to be
408 < dependent on the amount of CO adsorbed upon the surface. This result is likely
409 < related to the effect that coverage has on surface diffusion. While both systems
410 < displayed step edge wandering, only the Pt surface underwent doubling within
411 < the time scales we were modeling. Specifically only the 50 \% coverage Pt system
412 < was observed to undergo a complete doubling in the time scales we were able to monitor.
370 < This event encouraged us to allow that specific system to run continuously during which two
371 < more double layers were created. The other systems, not displaying any large scale changes
372 < of interest, were all stopped after 40 ns of simulation. Neverthless, the other Platinum systems tended to show
373 < more cumulative lateral movement of the step edges when compared to the Gold systems.
374 < The 50 \% Pt system is highlighted in figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at various times along the
375 < simulation showing the evolution of the system.
402 > The bare metal surfaces experienced minor roughening of the
403 > step-edge because of the elevated temperatures, but the (557)
404 > face was stable throughout the simulations. The surface of both
405 > systems, upon dosage of CO, began to undergo extensive remodeling
406 > that was not observed in the bare systems. Reconstructions of
407 > the Au systems were limited to breakup of the step-edges and
408 > some step wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
409 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent. The 50\% coverage
410 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it formed
411 > well-defined and stable double layers through step coalescence,
412 > similar to results reported by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}
413  
377 The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by Tao involved the
378 formation of triangular clusters that stretched across the plateau between two step edges.
379 Neither system, within our simulated time scales, experiences this reconstruction. A constructed
380 system in which the triangular motifs were constructed on the surface will be explored in future
381 work and is shown in the supporting information.
414  
415 < \subsection{Dynamics}
416 < While atomistic-like simulations of stepped surfaces have been performed before \cite{}, they tend to be
417 < performed using Monte Carlo techniques\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. This allows them to efficiently sample the thermodynamic
418 < landscape but at the expense of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous work, using STM \cite{Pearl},
419 < has been able to visualize the coalescing of steps of (system). The time scale of the image acquisition, ~ 70 s/image
420 < provides an upper bounds for the time required for the doubling to actually occur. While statistical treatments
421 < of step edges are adept at analyzing such systems, it is important to remember that the edges are made
422 < up of individual atoms and thus can be examined in numerous ways.
415 > \subsubsection{Step wandering}
416 > The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417 > step-wandering at their respective temperatures. As the CO
418 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface atoms,
419 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system where step
421 > coalescence occurred, the step-edges in the other simulations
422 > preferred to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in
423 > the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA~for Pt and $\sim$14\AA~for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams {\it et al}.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425 > highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426 > when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 > repulsion is caused by an entropic barrier that arises from
428 > the fact that steps cannot cross over one another. This entropic
429 > repulsion does not completely define the interactions between
430 > steps, however, so it is possible to observe step coalescence
431 > on some surfaces.\cite{Williams:1991} The presence and
432 > concentration of adsorbates, as shown in this work, can
433 > affect step-step interactions, potentially leading to a new
434 > surface structure as the thermodynamic equilibrium.
435  
436 < \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
437 < %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
438 < The movement of a step edge is a cooperative effect arising from the individual movements of the atoms
439 < making up the step. An ideal metal surface displaying a low index facet (111, 100, 110) is unlikely to
440 < experience much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier to lift an atom out of the surface.
441 < For our surfaces however, the presence of step edges provide a source for mobile metal atoms. Breaking away
442 < from the step edge still imposes an energetic penalty around 40 kcal/mole, but is much less than lifting the same metal
443 < atom out from the surface,  > 60 kcal/mole, and the penalty lowers even further when CO is present in sufficient quantities
444 < on the surface, ~20 kcal/mole. Once an adatom exists on the surface, its barrier for diffusion is negligible ( < 4 kcal/mole)
445 < and is well able to explore its terrace. Atoms traversing terraces is more difficult, but can be overcome through a joining and lifting stage.
446 < By tracking the mobility of individual metal atoms on the Platinum and Gold surfaces we were able to determine
447 < the relative diffusion rates and how varying coverages of CO affected the rates. Close
448 < observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in equilibrium with the
449 < step edges, constantly breaking apart and rejoining. Additionally, at times their motion was concerted and
450 < two or more atoms would be observed moving together across the surfaces. The primary challenge in quantifying
451 < the overall surface mobility was in defining ``mobile" vs. ``static" atoms.
436 > \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.
439 > The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on a number of surfaces
441 > at varying conditions, including Ni(977) and Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442 > Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443 > propensity for reconstruction  
444 > because of the larger surface mobility and the greater extent of step wandering.
445 > The amount of reconstruction was strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446 > adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447 > effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. Only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
449 > doubling seen by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
450 > Over a longer time scale (150~ns) two more double layers formed
451 > on this surface. Although double layer formation did not occur
452 > in the other Pt systems, they exhibited more step-wandering and
453 > roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
454 > 50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
455 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
456  
457 < A particle was considered mobile once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~ between saved configurations
458 < of the system (10-100 ps). An atom that was truly mobile would typically travel much greater than this, but
459 < the 2~\AA~ cutoff was to prevent the in-place vibrational movement of atoms from being included in the analysis.
460 < Since diffusion on  a surface is strongly affected by local structures, in this case the presence of single and double
461 < layer step edges, the diffusion parallel to the step edges was determined separately from the diffusion perpendicular
414 < to these edges. The parallel and perpendicular diffusion constants are shown in figure \ref{fig:diff}.
457 > The second reconstruction observed by
458 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
459 > across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither metal, within
460 > the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
461 > the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
462  
416 \subsubsection{Double layer formation}
417 The increased amounts of diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages appears to play a role in the
418 formation of double layers, seeing as how that was the only system within our observed simulation time
419 that showed the formation. Despite this being the only system where this reconstruction occurs, three separate layers
420 were formed over the extended run time of this system. As mentioned earlier, previous experimental work has given some insight into
421 the upper bounds of the time required for enough atoms to move around to allow two steps to coalesce\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}.
422 As seen in figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first appearance of a double layer, a nodal site, appears at 19 ns into
423 the simulation. Within 12 ns, nearly half of the step has formed the double layer and by 86 ns, a smooth complete
424 layer has formed. The double layer is complete by 37 ns but is a bit rough.
425 From the appearance of the first node to the initial doubling of the layers ignoring their roughness took ~20 ns.
426 Another ~40 ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in this simulation form
427 over a period of 22 ns and 42 ns respectively.
428
463   %Evolution of surface
464   \begin{figure}[H]
465 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
465 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation}
466   \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
467 <  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258 ps, (b) 19 ns, (c) 31.2 ns, and
468 <  (d) 86.1 ns. Disruption of the 557 step edges occurs quickly.  The
469 <  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step edges
467 >  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
468 >  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
469 >  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
470    touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
471    step observed in the later configurations.}
472    \label{fig:reconstruct}
473   \end{figure}
474 +
475 + \subsection{Dynamics}
476 + Previous experimental work by Pearl and Sibener\cite{Pearl},
477 + using STM, has been able to capture the coalescence of steps
478 + on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition, $\sim$70~s/image,
479 + provides an upper bound for the time required for the doubling
480 + to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we are able to probe
481 + the dynamics of these reconstructions at elevated temperatures
482 + and in this section we provide data on the timescales for transport
483 + properties, e.g. diffusion and layer formation time.
484 +
485 +
486 + \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
487 + %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
488 + The wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
489 + arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
490 + displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
491 + much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
492 + be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
493 + on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
494 + Single-atom break-away from a step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
495 + energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
496 + the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
497 + The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
498 + on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Discussion, the penalty can fall to as low as
499 + $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
500 + diffusion is negligible (\textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
501 + able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
502 + becoming a part of a different edge. It is an energetically unfavorable process with a high barrier for an atom
503 + to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
504 + energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
505 + metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
506 + diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
507 + observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
508 + equilibrium with the step-edges.
509 + At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
510 + observed moving together across the surfaces.
511  
512 + A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
513 + between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). A mobile atom
514 + would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
515 + was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
516 + movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
517 + local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
518 + step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
519 + the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
520 + diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
521 +
522 + %Diffusion graph
523   \begin{figure}[H]
524 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade.pdf}
524 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1}
525   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
526    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
527 <  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the 557 step edges as a function of CO
528 <  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step edge is higher
527 >  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
528 >  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
529    than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
530 <  barrier associated with going from approximately 7 nearest neighbors
531 <  to 5, as compared to the 3 of an adatom. Additionally, the observed
532 <  maximum and subsequent decrease for the Pt system suggests that the
533 <  CO self-interactions are playing a significant role with regards to
534 <  movement of the platinum atoms around and more importantly across
453 <  the surface. }
530 >  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
531 >  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
532 >  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
533 >  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
534 >  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
535   \label{fig:diff}
536   \end{figure}
537  
538 + The weaker Au-CO interaction is evident in the weak CO-coverage
539 + dependance of Au diffusion. This weak interaction leads to lower
540 + observed coverages when compared to dosage amounts. This further
541 + limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
542 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates shows a near linear relationship
543 + at the earliest times in the simulations. Following double layer formation,
544 + however, there is a precipitous drop in adatom diffusion. As the double
545 + layer forms, many atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have
546 + now been buried resulting in a smaller reported diffusion constant. A
547 + secondary effect of higher coverages is CO-CO cross interactions that
548 + lower the effective mobility of the Pt adatoms that are bound to each CO.
549 + This effect would become evident only at higher coverages. A detailed
550 + account of Pt adatom energetics follows in the Discussion.
551 +
552  
553 + \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
554 + The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages is the primary
555 + contributor to double layer formation. However, this is not a complete
556 + explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system has higher diffusion constants, but
557 + did not show any signs of edge doubling in 40~ns. On the 50\%~Pt
558 + system, one double layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time,
559 + while two more were formed as the system was allowed to run for an
560 + additional 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction
561 + is a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound is a
562 + very large overestimate.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl} In this system the first
563 + appearance of a double layer appears at 19~ns into the simulation.
564 + Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has formed
565 + the double layer and by 86~ns the complete layer has flattened out.
566 + From the appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed
567 + double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another $\sim$40~ns was
568 + necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in
569 + this simulation formed over periods of 22~ns and 42~ns respectively.
570 + A possible explanation for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated
571 + temperatures under which our systems were simulated. The process
572 + would almost certainly take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally,
573 + our measured times for completion of the doubling after the appearance
574 + of a nucleation site are likely affected by our periodic boxes. A longer
575 + step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''.
576  
577  
578   %Discussion
579   \section{Discussion}
580 < In this paper we have shown that we were able to accurately model the initial reconstruction of the
581 < Pt (557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
582 < were able to capture the dynamic processes inherent within this reconstruction.
580 > We have shown that a classical potential is able to model the initial
581 > reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption, and have
582 > reproduced the double layer structure observed by Tao {\it et
583 >  al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. Additionally, this reconstruction appears to be
584 > rapid -- occurring within 100 ns of the initial exposure to CO.  Here
585 > we discuss the features of the classical potential that are
586 > contributing to the stability and speed of the Pt(557) reconstruction.
587  
588 < \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
589 < The increased computational cost to examine this system using molecular dynamics rather than
590 < a Monte Carlo based approach was necessary so that our predictions on possible mechanisms
591 < and driving forces would have support not only from thermodynamic arguments but also from the
592 < actual dynamics of the system.
588 > \subsection{Diffusion}
589 > The perpendicular diffusion constant appears to be the most important
590 > indicator of double layer formation. As highlighted in Figure
591 > \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the formation of the double layer did not begin
592 > until a nucleation site appeared.  Williams {\it et
593 >  al}.\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} cite an effective edge-edge
594 > repulsion arising from the inability of edge crossing.  This repulsion
595 > must be overcome to allow step coalescence.  A larger
596 > $\textbf{D}_\perp$ value implies more step-wandering and a larger
597 > chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges to create a nucleation
598 > point.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a
599 > nascent double layer. This helps explain the rapid time scale for
600 > double layer completion after the appearance of a nucleation site, while
601 > the initial appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
602  
603 < Comparing the results from simulation to those reported previously by
604 < Tao et al. the similarities in the platinum and CO system are quite
605 < strong. As shown in figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the simulated platinum system under a CO
606 < atmosphere will restructure slightly by doubling the terrace
607 < heights. The restructuring appears to occur slowly, one to two
608 < platinum atoms at a time. Looking at individual snapshots, these
478 < adatoms tend to either rise on top of the plateau or break away from
479 < the step edge and then diffuse perpendicularly to the step direction
480 < until reaching another step edge. This combination of growth and decay
481 < of the step edges appears to be in somewhat of a state of dynamic
482 < equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges meet as
483 < shown in figure 1.B, this point tends to act as a focus or growth
484 < point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a
485 < zipper. From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed
486 < during the simulation, measuring from the initial appearance of a
487 < growth point, the double layer tends to be fully formed within
488 < $\sim$~35 ns.
489 <
490 < There are a number of possible mechanisms to explain the role of
491 < adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion
492 < between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
603 > \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
604 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of our
605 > simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system which
606 > did exhibit doubling. A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain
607 > the role of adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar
608 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
609   possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
610   short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
611 < molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation relative to each other however,
612 < this explanation gains some weight.  The energetic repulsion between two CO
613 < located a distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) with both in a
614 < vertical orientation is 8.62 kcal/mole. Moving the CO apart to the second nearest-neighbor
615 < distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to nearly 0 kcal/mole. SHOW A NUMBER FOR ROTATION.
616 < As mentioned above, the energy barrier for surface diffusion of a platinum adatom is only 4 kcal/mole. So this
617 < repulsion between CO can help increase the surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO was examined
618 < and while the majority of the CO is on or near the surface throughout the run, it is extremely mobile. This mobility
619 < suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without necessarily dragging the platinum along
620 < with them.
611 > molecules are ``locked'' in a vertical orientation, through atop
612 > adsorption for example, this explanation would gain credence. The
613 > calculated energetic repulsion between two CO molecules located a
614 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both
615 > in a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the
616 > second nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to
617 > nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical
618 > orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the carbons are locked at
619 > a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached when the
620 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.  The calculated
621 > barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
622 > repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the
623 > surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests
624 > that the CO molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40
625 > to 2500 times larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests
626 > that the CO molecules jump between different Pt atoms throughout the
627 > simulation, but can stay bound for significant periods of time.
628  
629 < Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
630 < destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
631 < Pt atoms.  This could have the effect of increasing surface mobility
632 < of these atoms.  To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
633 < CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
634 < around a step on a otherwise clean Pt (557) surface. One representative
635 < configuration is displayed in figure \ref{fig:lambda}. Single or concerted movement
636 < of platinum atoms was then examined to determine possible barriers. Because
637 < of the forced movement along a pre-defined reaction coordinate that may differ
638 < from the true minimum of this path, only the beginning and ending energies
639 < are displayed in table \ref{tab:energies}. The presence of CO at suitable
640 < sites can lead to lowered barriers for platinum breaking apart from the step edge.
641 < Additionally, as highlighted in figure \ref{fig:lambda}, the presence of CO makes the
642 < burrowing and lifting nature favorable, whereas without CO, the process is neutral
643 < in terms of energetics.
629 > A different interpretation of the above mechanism which takes the
630 > large mobility of the CO into account, would be in the destabilization
631 > of Pt-Pt interactions due to bound CO.  Destabilizing Pt-Pt bonds at
632 > the edges could lead to increased step-edge breakup and diffusion. On
633 > the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach an edge atom
634 > is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
635 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain
636 > configurations, cases (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to
637 > $\sim$23~kcal/mol by the presence of bound CO molecules. In these
638 > instances, it becomes energetically favorable to roughen the edge by
639 > introducing a small separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening
640 > becomes immediately obvious in simulations with significant CO
641 > populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent on surfaces
642 > with lower CO coverage (and even on the bare surfaces), although in
643 > these cases it is likely due to random fluctuations that squeeze out
644 > step-edge atoms. Step-edge breakup by continuous single-atom
645 > translations (as suggested by these energy curves) is probably a
646 > worst-case scenario.  Multistep mechanisms in which an adatom moves
647 > laterally on the surface after being ejected would be more
648 > energetically favorable.  This would leave the adatom alongside the
649 > ledge, providing it with 5 nearest neighbors.  While fewer than the 7
650 > neighbors it had as part of the step-edge, it keeps more Pt neighbors
651 > than the 3 an isolated adatom would have on the terrace. In this
652 > proposed mechanism, the CO quadrupolar repulsion still plays a role in
653 > the initial roughening of the step-edge, but not in any long-term
654 > bonds with individual Pt atoms.  Higher CO coverages create more
655 > opportunities for the crowded CO configurations shown in Figure
656 > \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and this is likely to cause an increased
657 > propensity for step-edge breakup.
658  
659 + %Sketch graphic of different configurations
660 + \begin{figure}[H]
661 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{COpaths}
662 + \caption{Configurations used to investigate the mechanism of step-edge
663 +  breakup on Pt(557). In each case, the central (starred) atom is
664 +  pulled directly across the surface away from the step edge.  The Pt
665 +  atoms on the upper terrace are colored dark grey, while those on the
666 +  lower terrace are in white.  In each of these configurations, some
667 +  number of the atoms (highlighted in blue) had a CO molecule bound in
668 +  a vertical atop position.  The energies of these configurations as a
669 +  function of central atom displacement are displayed in Figure
670 +  \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
671 + \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
672 + \end{figure}
673 +
674 + %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
675 + \begin{figure}[H]
676 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison}
677 + \caption{Energies for displacing a single edge atom perpendicular to
678 +  the step edge as a function of atomic displacement. Each of the
679 +  energy curves corresponds to one of the labeled configurations in
680 +  Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and are referenced to the
681 +  unperturbed step-edge.  Certain arrangements of bound CO (notably
682 +  configurations g and h) can lower the energetic barrier for creating
683 +  an adatom relative to the bare surface (configuration a).}
684 + \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
685 + \end{figure}
686 +
687 + While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase
688 + diffusion and the likelihood of edge wandering, this does not provide
689 + a complete explanation for the formation of double layers. If adatoms
690 + were constrained to their original terraces then doubling could not
691 + occur.  A mechanism for vertical displacement of adatoms at the
692 + step-edge is required to explain the doubling.
693 +
694 + We have discovered one possible mechanism for a CO-mediated vertical
695 + displacement of Pt atoms at the step edge. Figure \ref{fig:lambda}
696 + shows four points along a reaction coordinate in which a CO-bound
697 + adatom along the step-edge ``burrows'' into the edge and displaces the
698 + original edge atom onto the higher terrace. A number of events similar
699 + to this mechanism were observed during the simulations.  We predict an
700 + energetic barrier of 20~kcal/mol for this process (in which the
701 + displaced edge atom follows a curvilinear path into an adjacent 3-fold
702 + hollow site).  The barrier heights we obtain for this reaction
703 + coordinate are approximate because the exact path is unknown, but the
704 + calculated energy barriers would be easily accessible at operating
705 + conditions.  Additionally, this mechanism is exothermic, with a final
706 + energy 15~kcal/mol below the original $\lambda = 0$ configuration.
707 + When CO is not present and this reaction coordinate is followed, the
708 + process is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol.  The difference in the relative
709 + energies for the $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=1$ case when CO is present
710 + provides strong support for CO-mediated Pt-Pt interactions giving rise
711 + to the doubling reconstruction.
712 +
713   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
714   \begin{figure}[H]
715 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO.png}
716 < \caption{A model system of the Pt 557 surface was used as the framework for a reaction coordinate.
717 < Various numbers, placements, and rotations of CO were examined. The one displayed was a
718 < representative sample. As shown in Table , relative to the energy at 0\% there is a slight decrease
719 < upon insertion of the platinum atom into the step edge along with the resultant lifting of the other
720 < platinum atom.}
715 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord}
716 > \caption{Points along a possible reaction coordinate for CO-mediated
717 >  edge doubling. Here, a CO-bound adatom burrows into an established
718 >  step edge and displaces an edge atom onto the upper terrace along a
719 >  curvilinear path.  The approximate barrier for the process is
720 >  20~kcal/mol, and the complete process is exothermic by 15~kcal/mol
721 >  in the presence of CO, but is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol without.}
722   \label{fig:lambda}
723   \end{figure}
724  
725 + The mechanism for doubling on the Pt(557) surface appears to require
726 + the cooperation of at least two distinct processes. For complete
727 + doubling of a layer to occur there must be a breakup of one
728 + terrace. These atoms must then ``disappear'' from that terrace, either
729 + by travelling to the terraces above of below their original levels.
730 + The presence of CO helps explain mechanisms for both of these
731 + situations. There must be sufficient breakage of the step-edge to
732 + increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and these adatoms
733 + must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above (or a comparable
734 + mechanism) to create the double layer.  With sufficient time, these
735 + mechanisms working in concert lead to the formation of a double layer.
736  
737 + \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
738 + Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system, it remained for
739 + the rest of the simulation time with minimal movement.  Random
740 + fluctuations that involved small clusters or divots were observed, but
741 + these features typically healed within a few nanoseconds.  Within our
742 + simulations, the formation of the double layer appeared to be
743 + irreversible and a double layer was never observed to split back into
744 + two single layer step-edges while CO was present.
745  
746 < \subsection{Diffusion}
747 < As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step edge tends to be
748 < much faster than that perpendicular to the step edge. Additionally, the coverage
749 < of CO appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in figure \ref{fig:diff}
750 < Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation
751 < of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it
752 < appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step edge, will allow for
753 < a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on
754 < only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the
755 < more likely a growth point is to be formed.
756 < \\
746 > To further gauge the effect CO has on this surface, additional
747 > simulations were run starting from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt
748 > system that had already formed double layers. These simulations then
749 > had their CO forcibly removed.  The double layer broke apart rapidly
750 > in these simulations, showing a well-defined edge-splitting after
751 > 100~ps. Configurations of this system are shown in Figure
752 > \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring of the top and bottom layers helps to
753 > exhibit how much mixing the edges experience as they split. These
754 > systems were only examined for 10~ns, and within that time despite the
755 > initial rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few
756 > \AA~apart. It is possible that with longer simulation times, the (557)
757 > surface recovery observed by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} could
758 > also be recovered.
759  
547
760   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
761   \begin{figure}[H]
762 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
763 < \caption{Hi}
762 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking}
763 > \caption{Dynamics of an established (111) double step after removal of
764 >  the adsorbed CO: (A) 0~ps, (B) 100~ps, and (C) 1~ns after the removal
765 >  of CO. The presence of the CO helped maintain the stability of the
766 >  double step.  Nearly immediately after the CO is removed, the step
767 >  edge reforms in a (100) configuration, which is also the step type
768 >  seen on clean (557) surfaces. The step separation involves
769 >  significant mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
770   \label{fig:breaking}
771   \end{figure}
772  
773  
556
557
774   %Peaks!
775 < \begin{figure}[H]
776 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
777 < \caption{}
778 < \label{fig:peaks}
779 < \end{figure}
775 > %\begin{figure}[H]
776 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
777 > %\caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
778 > %of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
779 > %aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
780 > %\label{fig:peaks}
781 > %\end{figure}
782  
783 +
784 + %Don't think I need this
785   %clean surface...
786 < \begin{figure}[H]
787 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
788 < \caption{}
786 > %\begin{figure}[H]
787 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF}
788 > %\caption{}
789  
790 < \end{figure}
791 < \label{fig:clean}
790 > %\end{figure}
791 > %\label{fig:clean}
792 >
793 >
794   \section{Conclusion}
795 + The strength and directionality of the Pt-CO binding interaction, as
796 + well as the large quadrupolar repulsion between atop-bound CO
797 + molecules, help to explain the observed increase in surface mobility
798 + of Pt(557) and the resultant reconstruction into a double-layer
799 + configuration at the highest simulated CO-coverages.  The weaker Au-CO
800 + interaction results in significantly lower adataom diffusion
801 + constants, less step-wandering, and a lack of the double layer
802 + reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
803  
804 + An in-depth examination of the energetics shows the important role CO
805 + plays in increasing step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal
806 + which are both necessary for double layer formation.
807  
808   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
809  
# Line 594 | Line 827 | more likely a growth point is to be formed.
827   % \end{tabular}
828   % \end{table}
829  
830 < \section{Acknowledgments}
831 < Support for this project was provided by the National Science
832 < Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
833 < Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
834 < Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
835 <
830 > \begin{acknowledgement}
831 >  We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. William
832 >  F. Schneider and Dr. Feng Tao.  Support for this project was
833 >  provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243
834 >  and by the Center for Sustainable Energy at Notre Dame
835 >  (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
836 >  Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
837 > \end{acknowledgement}
838   \newpage
839   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
840 < \end{doublespace}
840 > %\end{doublespace}
841 >
842 > \begin{tocentry}
843 >
844 > \includegraphics[height=2.8cm]{TOC_doubleLayer}
845 >
846 > A reconstructed Pt(557) surface after having been exposed to a dosage of CO equivalent to half a monolayer of coverage.
847 >
848 > \end{tocentry}
849 >
850   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines