ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3877 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 15 13:18:17 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3886 by jmichalk, Wed Mar 20 19:03:36 2013 UTC

# Line 20 | Line 20
20   \usepackage{graphicx}
21   \usepackage{multirow}
22   \usepackage{multicol}
23 + \usepackage{wrapfig}
24 + \mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
25 + %\usepackage{epstopdf}
26  
27   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
28   % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
29   \usepackage{url}
30   \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
31   \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
32 < 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
32 > 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=1110000
33  
34   % double space list of tables and figures
35   %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
# Line 73 | Line 76 | We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) u
76  
77  
78   \begin{abstract}
79 < We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
80 < various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
81 < explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
82 < and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
83 < as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
84 < this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
85 < strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
86 < role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
87 < small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
88 < was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
89 < is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
90 < systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
88 <
79 >  The mechanism and dynamics of surface reconstructions of Pt(557) and
80 >  Au(557) exposed to various coverages of carbon monoxide (CO) were
81 >  investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. Metal-CO
82 >  interactions were parameterized from experimental data and
83 >  plane-wave Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations.  The large
84 >  difference in binding strengths of the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions
85 >  was found to play a significant role in step-edge stability and
86 >  adatom diffusion constants.  Various mechanisms for CO-mediated step
87 >  wandering and step doubling were investigated on the Pt(557)
88 >  surface.  We find that the energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
89 >  can explain the step-doubling reconstruction observed on Pt(557) and
90 >  the lack of such a reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
91   \end{abstract}
92  
93   \newpage
# Line 117 | Line 119 | This work is an investigation into the mechanism and t
119   reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
120   carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
121  
122 < This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for
122 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for the Pt(557) \& Au(557)
123   surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
124   of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
125   fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
# Line 126 | Line 128 | The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction w
128   catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
129   to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
130   to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
131 < The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
132 < likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
133 < and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
134 < reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxation to the
131 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is less
132 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters {\it et al}.\cite{Peters:2000}
133 > and Piccolo {\it et al}.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
134 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters {\it et al}. saw a relaxation to the
135   22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
136 < become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
136 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction, while
137   allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
138 < configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern being greatly
139 < affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
138 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern on Au(111) being greatly
139 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo {\it et al}. on the other hand, did see a
140   disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
141   surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
142   low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
# Line 149 | Line 151 | adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite l
151   development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
152   model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
153   adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
154 < 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
154 > 10$^4$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
155   molecular dynamics
156   (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
157   methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
# Line 161 | Line 163 | Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{EAM} The CO was mod
163   Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
164   dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
165   for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
166 < Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{EAM} The CO was modeled using a rigid
166 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions.\cite{Foiles86} The CO was modeled using a rigid
167   three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
168   photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
169   Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
# Line 174 | Line 176 | parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is
176   methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
177   but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
178   the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
179 < parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is among the
180 < fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
181 < all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
179 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88} is among the
180 > fastest of these density functional approaches. In
181 > all of these models, atoms are treated as a positively charged
182   core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
183   calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
184   the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
# Line 207 | Line 209 | properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007
209   The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) potentials
210   have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
211   simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
212 < properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
212 > properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq,mishin99:_inter}
213   melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
214 < fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
215 < propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
216 < dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
214 > fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx,mishin01:cu} crack
215 > propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg,Rifkin1992} and alloying
216 > dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni} One of EAM's strengths
217   is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
218 < from the original parameterization, where the interactions
219 < up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
220 < Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
218 > because interactions
219 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account in the parameterization.\cite{Voter95a}
220 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al}.\cite{Ercolessi88}
221   which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
222   interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
223   the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
224 < surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
224 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAM's functional
225   treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
226   theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
225 \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
227  
228  
229  
230  
231 +
232   \subsection{Carbon Monoxide model}
233   Previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
234   the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}  
# Line 272 | Line 274 | et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit t
274   position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
275   The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
276   than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
277 < et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
278 < Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
277 > {\it et al}.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
278 > Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged, partial
279   binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
280   Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
281   equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
282 < over O as the surface-binding atom. In most cases, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
282 > over O as the surface-binding atom. In most geometries, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
283   repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
284   surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
285   (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
# Line 314 | Line 316 | and polarization are neglected in this model, although
316   The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
317   are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
318   (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
319 < and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
320 < affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
319 < future work.
319 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects could have
320 > an effect on  binding energies and binding site preferences.
321  
322   %Table  of Parameters
323   %Pt Parameter Set 9
# Line 360 | Line 361 | dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
361   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
362   Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
363   54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
364 < dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
364 > dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA. The metal slabs
365 > are 9 and 8 atoms deep respectively, corresponding to a slab
366 > thickness of $\sim$21~\AA~ for Pt and $\sim$19~\AA~for Au.
367   The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
368   along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
369   {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
# Line 369 | Line 372 | The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10
372   1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
373   stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
374  
375 < The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
375 > The different bulk melting temperatures predicted by EAM (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
376   and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
377   different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
378   initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
# Line 387 | Line 390 | source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,
390   data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
391   data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
392   systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
393 < source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
393 > source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE,openmd}
394  
395  
396  
# Line 396 | Line 399 | The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
399   %
400   \section{Results}
401   \subsection{Structural remodeling}
402 < The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
403 < to undergo extensive remodeling that was not observed in the bare
404 < systems. The bare metal surfaces
405 < experienced minor roughening of the step-edge because
406 < of the elevated temperatures, but the
407 < (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
408 < time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
409 < roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
410 < wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
411 < similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
412 < compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
410 < Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
411 < formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
412 < similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
402 > The bare metal surfaces experienced minor roughening of the
403 > step-edge because of the elevated temperatures, but the (557)
404 > face was stable throughout the simulations. The surface of both
405 > systems, upon dosage of CO, began to undergo extensive remodeling
406 > that was not observed in the bare systems. Reconstructions of
407 > the Au systems were limited to breakup of the step-edges and
408 > some step wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
409 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent. The 50\% coverage
410 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it formed
411 > well-defined and stable double layers through step coalescence,
412 > similar to results reported by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010}
413  
414  
415   \subsubsection{Step wandering}
416   The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417 < movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
418 < coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
417 > step-wandering at their respective temperatures. As the CO
418 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface atoms,
419   described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 < also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
421 < did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead
422 < preferring to keep nearly the same distance between steps
423 < as in the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA for Pt and $\sim$14\AA for Au.
424 < Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system where step
421 > coalescence occurred, the step-edges in the other simulations
422 > preferred to keep nearly the same distance between steps as in
423 > the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA~for Pt and $\sim$14\AA~for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams {\it et al}.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425   highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426   when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 < repulsion arises because step-edge crossing is not allowed
428 < which constrains the entropy. This entropic repulsion does
429 < not completely define the interactions between steps, which
430 < is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence, where
431 < additional attractive interactions can overcome the repulsion.\cite{Williams:1991}
432 < The presence and concentration of adsorbates, as shown in
433 < this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially leading
434 < to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
427 > repulsion is caused by an entropic barrier that arises from
428 > the fact that steps cannot cross over one another. This entropic
429 > repulsion does not completely define the interactions between
430 > steps, however, so it is possible to observe step coalescence
431 > on some surfaces.\cite{Williams:1991} The presence and
432 > concentration of adsorbates, as shown in this work, can
433 > affect step-step interactions, potentially leading to a new
434 > surface structure as the thermodynamic equilibrium.
435  
436   \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 < Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 < undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
437 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.
439   The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 < Similar behavior has been seen on numerous surfaces
441 < at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on a number of surfaces
441 > at varying conditions, including Ni(977) and Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442   Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443 < propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
444 < because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
445 < The amount of reconstruction is strongly correlated to the amount of CO
443 > propensity for reconstruction  
444 > because of the larger surface mobility and the greater extent of step wandering.
445 > The amount of reconstruction was strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446   adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447   effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448 < surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
449 < step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
450 < doubling seen by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
451 < Over longer periods, (150~ns) two more double layers formed
452 < on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
453 < in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454 < general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
448 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. Only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
449 > doubling seen by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
450 > Over a longer time scale (150~ns) two more double layers formed
451 > on this surface. Although double layer formation did not occur
452 > in the other Pt systems, they exhibited more step-wandering and
453 > roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
454   50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
455   various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
456  
457 < The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
458 < Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
459 < across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
457 > The second reconstruction observed by
458 > Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
459 > across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither metal, within
460   the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
461   the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
462  
463   %Evolution of surface
464   \begin{figure}[H]
465 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
465 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation}
466   \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
467    initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
468    (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
# Line 474 | Line 473 | Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dea
473   \end{figure}
474  
475   \subsection{Dynamics}
476 < Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
477 < with the energetics and structures at different conditions.
478 < \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} Consequently, the most common
479 < technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo approaches give an efficient
480 < sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
481 < of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
482 < Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
483 < of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
485 < $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 < the doubling to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we were able to probe the dynamics of these reconstructions and in this section we give data on dynamic and
487 < transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
476 > Previous experimental work by Pearl and Sibener\cite{Pearl},
477 > using STM, has been able to capture the coalescence of steps
478 > on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition, $\sim$70~s/image,
479 > provides an upper bound for the time required for the doubling
480 > to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we are able to probe
481 > the dynamics of these reconstructions at elevated temperatures
482 > and in this section we provide data on the timescales for transport
483 > properties, e.g. diffusion and layer formation time.
484  
485  
486   \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
487   %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
488 < The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
488 > The wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
489   arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
490   displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
491   much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
492   be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
493   on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
494 < Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
494 > Single-atom break-away from a step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
495   energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
496   the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
497   The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
498 < on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Figures \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} and \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}, the penalty can fall to as low as
498 > on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Discussion, the penalty can fall to as low as
499   $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
500 < diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
500 > diffusion is negligible (\textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
501   able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
502 < becoming a part of a different edge. It is a difficult process for an atom
502 > becoming a part of a different edge. It is an energetically unfavorable process with a high barrier for an atom
503   to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
504   energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
505   metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
506   diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
507   observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
508 < equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
508 > equilibrium with the step-edges.
509   At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
510   observed moving together across the surfaces.
511  
512   A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
513 < between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
514 < truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
513 > between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). A mobile atom
514 > would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
515   was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
516   movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
517   local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
# Line 525 | Line 521 | diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}
521  
522   %Diffusion graph
523   \begin{figure}[H]
524 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
524 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_DiffusionComparison_1}
525   \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
526    parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
527    ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
# Line 539 | Line 535 | The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data
535   \label{fig:diff}
536   \end{figure}
537  
538 < The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data in Figure \ref{fig:diff} is likely due
539 < to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower observed
540 < coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
541 < then further limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
542 < between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
543 < definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
544 < explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
545 < the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
546 < stability strongly and many atoms that had been tracked for mobility
547 < data have now been buried. By performing the same diffusion
548 < calculation but on a shorter run time (20~ns), only including data
549 < before the formation of the first double layer, we obtain the larger
550 < values for both $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$
551 < at the 50\% coverage as seen in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
556 < This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
557 < expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
558 < drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
559 < mechanism of double layer formation focuses on the effect that CO on the
560 < surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
561 < coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
562 < thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
563 < arrangements of CO on the surface allowing for the formation of a path,
564 < a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
565 < As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
566 < changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
567 < potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
568 < their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
538 > The weaker Au-CO interaction is evident in the weak CO-coverage
539 > dependance of Au diffusion. This weak interaction leads to lower
540 > observed coverages when compared to dosage amounts. This further
541 > limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
542 > between coverage and Pt diffusion rates shows a near linear relationship
543 > at the earliest times in the simulations. Following double layer formation,
544 > however, there is a precipitous drop in adatom diffusion. As the double
545 > layer forms, many atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have
546 > now been buried resulting in a smaller reported diffusion constant. A
547 > secondary effect of higher coverages is CO-CO cross interactions that
548 > lower the effective mobility of the Pt adatoms that are bound to each CO.
549 > This effect would become evident only at higher coverages. A detailed
550 > account of Pt adatom energetics follows in the Discussion.
551 >
552  
570
571
553   \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
554 < The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages
555 < plays a primary role in double layer formation. However,
556 < this is not a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
557 < has higher diffusion constants but did not show any signs
558 < of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
559 < 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns
560 < of simulation time, while two more were formed as the
561 < system was allowed to run for an additional
562 < 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction is
563 < a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound
564 < will be lowered as experimental techniques continue to improve.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
565 < In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
566 < appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
567 < into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
568 < formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
569 < has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
570 < ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
571 < appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
572 < $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
573 < The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
574 < 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. A possible explanation
575 < for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
595 < under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
596 < take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally, our measured times for completion
597 < of the doubling after the appearance of a nucleation site are likely affected by our
598 < constrained axes. A longer step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''. However,
599 < the first appearance of a nucleation site will likely occur more quickly due to its stochastic nature.
554 > The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher CO coverages is the primary
555 > contributor to double layer formation. However, this is not a complete
556 > explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system has higher diffusion constants, but
557 > did not show any signs of edge doubling in 40~ns. On the 50\%~Pt
558 > system, one double layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time,
559 > while two more were formed as the system was allowed to run for an
560 > additional 110~ns (150~ns total). This suggests that this reconstruction
561 > is a rapid process and that the previously mentioned upper bound is a
562 > very large overestimate.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl} In this system the first
563 > appearance of a double layer appears at 19~ns into the simulation.
564 > Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has formed
565 > the double layer and by 86~ns the complete layer has flattened out.
566 > From the appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed
567 > double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another $\sim$40~ns was
568 > necessary for the layer to completely straighten. The other two layers in
569 > this simulation formed over periods of 22~ns and 42~ns respectively.
570 > A possible explanation for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated
571 > temperatures under which our systems were simulated. The process
572 > would almost certainly take longer at lower temperatures. Additionally,
573 > our measured times for completion of the doubling after the appearance
574 > of a nucleation site are likely affected by our periodic boxes. A longer
575 > step-edge will likely take longer to ``zipper''.
576  
577  
578 + %Discussion
579 + \section{Discussion}
580 + We have shown that a classical potential is able to model the initial
581 + reconstruction of the Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption, and have
582 + reproduced the double layer structure observed by Tao {\it et
583 +  al}.\cite{Tao:2010}. Additionally, this reconstruction appears to be
584 + rapid -- occurring within 100 ns of the initial exposure to CO.  Here
585 + we discuss the features of the classical potential that are
586 + contributing to the stability and speed of the Pt(557) reconstruction.
587  
588 + \subsection{Diffusion}
589 + The perpendicular diffusion constant appears to be the most important
590 + indicator of double layer formation. As highlighted in Figure
591 + \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the formation of the double layer did not begin
592 + until a nucleation site appeared.  Williams {\it et
593 +  al}.\cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994} cite an effective edge-edge
594 + repulsion arising from the inability of edge crossing.  This repulsion
595 + must be overcome to allow step coalescence.  A larger
596 + $\textbf{D}_\perp$ value implies more step-wandering and a larger
597 + chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges to create a nucleation
598 + point.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up a
599 + nascent double layer. This helps explain the rapid time scale for
600 + double layer completion after the appearance of a nucleation site, while
601 + the initial appearance of the nucleation site was unpredictable.
602  
603 + \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
604 + Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring in any of our
605 + simulations, our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system which
606 + did exhibit doubling. A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain
607 + the role of adsorbed CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar
608 + repulsion between adjacent CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one
609 + possibility.  However, the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is
610 + short-ranged and is attractive for some orientations.  If the CO
611 + molecules are ``locked'' in a vertical orientation, through atop
612 + adsorption for example, this explanation would gain credence. The
613 + calculated energetic repulsion between two CO molecules located a
614 + distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both
615 + in a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO to the
616 + second nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~drops the repulsion to
617 + nearly 0. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical
618 + orientation also lowers the repulsion. When the carbons are locked at
619 + a distance of 2.77~\AA, a minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached when the
620 + angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}.  The calculated
621 + barrier for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol, so
622 + repulsion between adjacent CO molecules bound to Pt could increase the
623 + surface diffusion. However, the residence time of CO on Pt suggests
624 + that the CO molecules are extremely mobile, with diffusion constants 40
625 + to 2500 times larger than surface Pt atoms. This mobility suggests
626 + that the CO molecules jump between different Pt atoms throughout the
627 + simulation, but can stay bound for significant periods of time.
628  
629 + A different interpretation of the above mechanism which takes the
630 + large mobility of the CO into account, would be in the destabilization
631 + of Pt-Pt interactions due to bound CO.  Destabilizing Pt-Pt bonds at
632 + the edges could lead to increased step-edge breakup and diffusion. On
633 + the bare Pt(557) surface the barrier to completely detach an edge atom
634 + is $\sim$43~kcal/mol, as is shown in configuration (a) in Figures
635 + \ref{fig:SketchGraphic} \& \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}. For certain
636 + configurations, cases (e), (g), and (h), the barrier can be lowered to
637 + $\sim$23~kcal/mol by the presence of bound CO molecules. In these
638 + instances, it becomes energetically favorable to roughen the edge by
639 + introducing a small separation of 0.5 to 1.0~\AA. This roughening
640 + becomes immediately obvious in simulations with significant CO
641 + populations. The roughening is present to a lesser extent on surfaces
642 + with lower CO coverage (and even on the bare surfaces), although in
643 + these cases it is likely due to random fluctuations that squeeze out
644 + step-edge atoms. Step-edge breakup by continuous single-atom
645 + translations (as suggested by these energy curves) is probably a
646 + worst-case scenario.  Multistep mechanisms in which an adatom moves
647 + laterally on the surface after being ejected would be more
648 + energetically favorable.  This would leave the adatom alongside the
649 + ledge, providing it with 5 nearest neighbors.  While fewer than the 7
650 + neighbors it had as part of the step-edge, it keeps more Pt neighbors
651 + than the 3 an isolated adatom would have on the terrace. In this
652 + proposed mechanism, the CO quadrupolar repulsion still plays a role in
653 + the initial roughening of the step-edge, but not in any long-term
654 + bonds with individual Pt atoms.  Higher CO coverages create more
655 + opportunities for the crowded CO configurations shown in Figure
656 + \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and this is likely to cause an increased
657 + propensity for step-edge breakup.
658  
659   %Sketch graphic of different configurations
660   \begin{figure}[H]
661 < \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
662 < \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
663 < the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
664 < upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
665 < complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
666 < Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
661 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{COpaths}
662 > \caption{Configurations used to investigate the mechanism of step-edge
663 >  breakup on Pt(557). In each case, the central (starred) atom is
664 >  pulled directly across the surface away from the step edge.  The Pt
665 >  atoms on the upper terrace are colored dark grey, while those on the
666 >  lower terrace are in white.  In each of these configurations, some
667 >  number of the atoms (highlighted in blue) had a CO molecule bound in
668 >  a vertical atop position.  The energies of these configurations as a
669 >  function of central atom displacement are displayed in Figure
670 >  \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
671   \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
672   \end{figure}
673  
674   %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
675   \begin{figure}[H]
676 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
677 < \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
678 < surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
679 < to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
680 < same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
681 < the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
682 < However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
683 < configurations of CO will be more likely. }
676 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Portrait_SeparationComparison}
677 > \caption{Energies for displacing a single edge atom perpendicular to
678 >  the step edge as a function of atomic displacement. Each of the
679 >  energy curves corresponds to one of the labeled configurations in
680 >  Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, and are referenced to the
681 >  unperturbed step-edge.  Certain arrangements of bound CO (notably
682 >  configurations g and h) can lower the energetic barrier for creating
683 >  an adatom relative to the bare surface (configuration a).}
684   \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
685   \end{figure}
686  
687 < %Discussion
688 < \section{Discussion}
689 < We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
690 < Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
691 < were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
687 > While configurations of CO on the surface are able to increase
688 > diffusion and the likelihood of edge wandering, this does not provide
689 > a complete explanation for the formation of double layers. If adatoms
690 > were constrained to their original terraces then doubling could not
691 > occur.  A mechanism for vertical displacement of adatoms at the
692 > step-edge is required to explain the doubling.
693  
694 < \subsection{Diffusion}
695 < As shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}, for the Pt systems, there
696 < is a strong trend toward higher diffusion constants as
697 < surface coverage of CO increases. The drop for the 50\%
698 < case being explained as double layer formation already
699 < beginning to occur in the analyzed 40~ns, which lowered
700 < the calculated diffusion rates. Between the parallel and
701 < perpendicular rates, the perpendicular diffusion constant
702 < appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
703 < formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
704 < formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
705 < site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
706 < the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective repulsion.
707 < This repulsion must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
708 < A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
709 < and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
710 < to form the nucleation point. Upon that appearance, parallel
711 < diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up the double
654 < layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
655 < the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
656 < appearance of said site was unpredictable.
694 > We have discovered one possible mechanism for a CO-mediated vertical
695 > displacement of Pt atoms at the step edge. Figure \ref{fig:lambda}
696 > shows four points along a reaction coordinate in which a CO-bound
697 > adatom along the step-edge ``burrows'' into the edge and displaces the
698 > original edge atom onto the higher terrace. A number of events similar
699 > to this mechanism were observed during the simulations.  We predict an
700 > energetic barrier of 20~kcal/mol for this process (in which the
701 > displaced edge atom follows a curvilinear path into an adjacent 3-fold
702 > hollow site).  The barrier heights we obtain for this reaction
703 > coordinate are approximate because the exact path is unknown, but the
704 > calculated energy barriers would be easily accessible at operating
705 > conditions.  Additionally, this mechanism is exothermic, with a final
706 > energy 15~kcal/mol below the original $\lambda = 0$ configuration.
707 > When CO is not present and this reaction coordinate is followed, the
708 > process is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol.  The difference in the relative
709 > energies for the $\lambda=0$ and $\lambda=1$ case when CO is present
710 > provides strong support for CO-mediated Pt-Pt interactions giving rise
711 > to the doubling reconstruction.
712  
658 \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
659 Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
660 our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
661 which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
662 Similarities of our results to those reported previously by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
663 are quite strong. The simulated Pt system exposed to a large dosage
664 of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace widths and step heights.
665 The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a
666 time, but is rapid on experimental timescales. The adatoms either break
667 away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift up onto
668 a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace until reaching
669 another step-edge or rejoining their original edge. This combination of
670 growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
671 However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in Figure 1.B,
672 this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
673 From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the
674 initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
675
676 A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
677 CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
678 CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  However,
679 the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
680 some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
681 relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
682 gains some credence. The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
683 distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
684 a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
685 nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
686 nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical orientation
687 also lowers the repulsion. A minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at when the
688 angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}, when the carbons are
689 locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart. As mentioned above, the energy barrier
690 for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between
691 neighboring CO molecules can increase the surface diffusion. However, the
692 residence time of CO on Pt was examined and while the majority of the CO is
693 on or near the surface throughout the run, the molecules are extremely mobile,
694 with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times larger, depending on coverage. This
695 mobility suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without
696 necessarily the Pt along with them.
697
698 Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
699 destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
700 Pt atoms. To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
701 CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
702 around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. A few sample
703 configurations are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}, with
704 energies at various positions along the path displayed in Table
705 NO TABLE. Certain configurations of CO, cases B and D for
706 example, can have quite strong energetic reasons for breaking
707 away from the step-edge. Although the packing of these configurations
708 is unlikely until CO coverage has reached a high enough value.
709 These examples are showing the most difficult cases, immediate
710 adatom formation through breakage away from the step-edge, which
711 is why their energies at large distances are relatively high. There are
712 mechanistic paths where an edge atom could get shifted to onto the
713 step-edge to form a small peak before fully breaking away. And again,
714 once the adatom is formed, the barrier for diffusion on the surface is
715 negligible. These sample configurations help explain CO's effect on
716 general surface mobility and step wandering, but they are lacking in
717 providing a mechanism for the formation of double layers. One possible
718 mechanism is elucidated in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, where a burrowing
719 and lifting process of an adatom and step-edge atom respectively is
720 examined. The system, without CO present, is nearly energetically
721 neutral, whereas with CO present there is a $\sim$ 15 kcal/mol drop
722 in the energy of the system.
723
713   %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
714   \begin{figure}[H]
715 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
716 < \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
717 < for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
718 < placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
719 < The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
720 < is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
721 < with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
715 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_rxnCoord}
716 > \caption{Points along a possible reaction coordinate for CO-mediated
717 >  edge doubling. Here, a CO-bound adatom burrows into an established
718 >  step edge and displaces an edge atom onto the upper terrace along a
719 >  curvilinear path.  The approximate barrier for the process is
720 >  20~kcal/mol, and the complete process is exothermic by 15~kcal/mol
721 >  in the presence of CO, but is endothermic by 3~kcal/mol without.}
722   \label{fig:lambda}
723   \end{figure}
724  
725 + The mechanism for doubling on the Pt(557) surface appears to require
726 + the cooperation of at least two distinct processes. For complete
727 + doubling of a layer to occur there must be a breakup of one
728 + terrace. These atoms must then ``disappear'' from that terrace, either
729 + by travelling to the terraces above of below their original levels.
730 + The presence of CO helps explain mechanisms for both of these
731 + situations. There must be sufficient breakage of the step-edge to
732 + increase the concentration of adatoms on the surface and these adatoms
733 + must then undergo the burrowing highlighted above (or a comparable
734 + mechanism) to create the double layer.  With sufficient time, these
735 + mechanisms working in concert lead to the formation of a double layer.
736  
737 + \subsection{CO Removal and double layer stability}
738 + Once a double layer had formed on the 50\%~Pt system, it remained for
739 + the rest of the simulation time with minimal movement.  Random
740 + fluctuations that involved small clusters or divots were observed, but
741 + these features typically healed within a few nanoseconds.  Within our
742 + simulations, the formation of the double layer appeared to be
743 + irreversible and a double layer was never observed to split back into
744 + two single layer step-edges while CO was present.
745  
746 + To further gauge the effect CO has on this surface, additional
747 + simulations were run starting from a late configuration of the 50\%~Pt
748 + system that had already formed double layers. These simulations then
749 + had their CO forcibly removed.  The double layer broke apart rapidly
750 + in these simulations, showing a well-defined edge-splitting after
751 + 100~ps. Configurations of this system are shown in Figure
752 + \ref{fig:breaking}. The coloring of the top and bottom layers helps to
753 + exhibit how much mixing the edges experience as they split. These
754 + systems were only examined for 10~ns, and within that time despite the
755 + initial rapid splitting, the edges only moved another few
756 + \AA~apart. It is possible that with longer simulation times, the (557)
757 + surface recovery observed by Tao {\it et al}.\cite{Tao:2010} could
758 + also be recovered.
759  
739
760   %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
761   \begin{figure}[H]
762 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
763 < \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
764 < helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
765 < and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
766 < there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
762 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{EPS_doubleLayerBreaking}
763 > \caption{Dynamics of an established (111) double step after removal of
764 >  the adsorbed CO: (A) 0~ps, (B) 100~ps, and (C) 1~ns after the removal
765 >  of CO. The presence of the CO helped maintain the stability of the
766 >  double step.  Nearly immediately after the CO is removed, the step
767 >  edge reforms in a (100) configuration, which is also the step type
768 >  seen on clean (557) surfaces. The step separation involves
769 >  significant mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
770   \label{fig:breaking}
771   \end{figure}
772  
773  
751
752
774   %Peaks!
775   %\begin{figure}[H]
776   %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
# Line 763 | Line 784 | in the energy of the system.
784   %Don't think I need this
785   %clean surface...
786   %\begin{figure}[H]
787 < %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
787 > %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF}
788   %\caption{}
789  
790   %\end{figure}
# Line 771 | Line 792 | In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the P
792  
793  
794   \section{Conclusion}
795 < In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
795 > The strength and directionality of the Pt-CO binding interaction, as
796 > well as the large quadrupolar repulsion between atop-bound CO
797 > molecules, help to explain the observed increase in surface mobility
798 > of Pt(557) and the resultant reconstruction into a double-layer
799 > configuration at the highest simulated CO-coverages.  The weaker Au-CO
800 > interaction results in significantly lower adataom diffusion
801 > constants, less step-wandering, and a lack of the double layer
802 > reconstruction on the Au(557) surface.
803  
804 + An in-depth examination of the energetics shows the important role CO
805 + plays in increasing step-breakup and in facilitating edge traversal
806 + which are both necessary for double layer formation.
807 +
808   %Things I am not ready to remove yet
809  
810   %Table of Diffusion Constants
# Line 796 | Line 828 | Support for this project was provided by the National
828   % \end{table}
829  
830   \begin{acknowledgement}
831 < Support for this project was provided by the National Science
832 < Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
833 < Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
834 < Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
831 >  We gratefully acknowledge conversations with Dr. William
832 >  F. Schneider and Dr. Feng Tao.  Support for this project was
833 >  provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243
834 >  and by the Center for Sustainable Energy at Notre Dame
835 >  (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the Center for Research
836 >  Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
837   \end{acknowledgement}
838   \newpage
839   \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
840   %\end{doublespace}
841  
842   \begin{tocentry}
843 < %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
843 >
844 > \includegraphics[height=2.8cm]{TOC_doubleLayer}
845 >
846 > A reconstructed Pt(557) surface after having been exposed to a dosage of CO equivalent to half a monolayer of coverage.
847 >
848   \end{tocentry}
849  
850   \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines