ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex (file contents):
Revision 3887 by gezelter, Thu Mar 21 15:28:49 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3891 by gezelter, Wed Jun 5 18:27:19 2013 UTC

# Line 4 | Line 4
4   \usepackage{natbib}
5   \usepackage{multirow}
6   \usepackage{wrapfig}
7 + \usepackage{fixltx2e}
8   %\mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
9  
10   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
# Line 323 | Line 324 | an effect on binding energies and binding site prefere
324    \hline
325    & Calculated & Experimental \\
326    \hline
327 <  \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
327 >  \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.84} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
328    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
329   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
330    \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
# Line 331 | Line 332 | an effect on binding energies and binding site prefere
332   \end{tabular}
333   \label{tab:co_energies}
334   \end{table}
335 +
336  
337 + \subsection{Forcefield validation}
338 + The CO-metal cross interactions were compared directly to DFT results
339 + found in the supporting information of Tao {\it et al.}
340 + \cite{Tao:2010} These calculations are estimates of the stabilization
341 + energy provided to double-layer reconstructions of the perfect 557
342 + surface by an overlayer of CO molecules in a $c (2 \times 4)$ pattern.
343 + To make the comparison, metal slabs that were five atoms thick and
344 + which displayed a 557 facet were constructed.  Double-layer
345 + (reconstructed) systems were created using six atomic layers where
346 + enough of a layer was removed from both exposed 557 facets to create
347 + the double step.  In all cases, the metal slabs contained 480 atoms
348 + and were minimized using steepest descent under the EAM force
349 + field. Both the bare metal slabs and slabs with 50\% carbon monoxide
350 + coverage (arranged in the $c (2 \times 4)$ pattern) were used.  The
351 + systems are periodic along and perpendicular to the step-edge axes
352 + with a large vacuum above the displayed 557 facet.
353 +
354 + Energies using our force field for the various systems are displayed
355 + in Table ~\ref{tab:steps}.  The relative energies are calculated as
356 + $E_{relative} = E_{system} - E_{M-557-S} - N_{CO} E_{CO-M}$,
357 + where $E_{CO-M}$ is -1.84 eV for CO-Pt and -0.39 eV for CO-Au. For
358 + platinum, the bare double layer is slightly less stable then the
359 + original single (557) step. However, addition of carbon monoxide
360 + stabilizes the reconstructed double layer relative to the perfect 557.
361 + This result is in qualitative agreement with DFT calculations in Tao
362 + {\it et al.}\cite{Tao:2010}, who also showed that the addition of CO
363 + leads to a reversal in stability.
364 +
365 + The DFT calculations suggest an increased stability of 0.1 kcal/mol
366 + per Pt atom, while our force field gives an approximately 0.4 kcal/mol
367 + increase in stability per Pt atom.  
368 +
369 + The gold systems show much smaller energy differences between the
370 + single and double layers. The weaker binding of CO to Au is evidenced
371 + by the much smaller change in relative energy between the structures
372 + when carbon monoxide is present.  Additionally, as CO-Au binding is
373 + much weaker, it would be unlikely that CO would approach the 50\%
374 + coverage levels operating temperatures.
375 +
376 + %Table of single step double step calculations
377 + \begin{table}[H]
378 +  \caption{Minimized single point energies of (S)ingle and (D)ouble
379 +    steps.  The addition of CO in a 50\% $c(2 \times 4)$ coverage acts as a
380 +    stabilizing presence and suggests a driving force for the observed
381 +    reconstruction on the highest coverage Pt system. All energies are
382 +    in kcal/mol.}
383 + \centering
384 + \begin{tabular}{| c | c | c | c | c | c |}
385 + \hline
386 + \textbf{Step} & \textbf{N}\textsubscript{M} & \textbf{N\textsubscript{CO}} & \textbf{Relative Energy} & \textbf{$\Delta$E/M} & \textbf{$\Delta$E/CO} \\
387 + \hline
388 + Pt(557)-S & 480 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - \\
389 + Pt(557)-D & 480 & 0 & 114.783 & 0.239 & -\\
390 + Pt(557)-S & 480 & 40 & -124.546 & -0.259 & -3.114\\
391 + Pt(557)-D & 480 & 44 & -34.953 & -0.073 & -0.794\\
392 + \hline
393 + \hline
394 + Au(557)-S & 480 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - \\
395 + Au(557)-D & 480 & 0 & 79.572 & 0.166 & - \\
396 + Au(557)-S & 480 & 40 & -157.199 & -0.327 & -3.930\\
397 + Au(557)-D & 480 & 44 & -123.297 & -0.257 & -2.802 \\
398 + \hline
399 + \end{tabular}
400 + \label{tab:steps}
401 + \end{table}
402 +
403 +
404   \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
405   Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
406   54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines