ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex (file contents):
Revision 3889 by jmichalk, Tue Jun 4 18:29:55 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3892 by gezelter, Wed Jun 5 21:22:46 2013 UTC

# Line 324 | Line 324 | an effect on binding energies and binding site prefere
324    \hline
325    & Calculated & Experimental \\
326    \hline
327 <  \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
327 >  \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.84} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
328    (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
329   & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
330    \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
# Line 334 | Line 334 | an effect on binding energies and binding site prefere
334   \end{table}
335  
336  
337 < \subsection{Validation of forcefield selections}
338 < By calculating minimum energies for commensurate systems of
339 < single and double layer Pt and Au systems with 0 and 50\% coverages
340 < (arranged in a c(2x4) pattern), our forcefield selections were able to be
341 < indirectly compared to results shown in the supporting information of Tao
342 < {\it et al.} \cite{Tao:2010}. Five layer thick systems, displaying a 557 facet
343 < were constructed, each composed of 480 metal atoms. Double layers systems
344 < were constructed from six layer thick systems where an entire layer was
345 < removed from both displayed facets to create a double step. By design, the
346 < double step system also contains 480 atoms, five layers thick, so energy
347 < comparisons between the arrangements can be made directly. The positions
348 < of the atoms were allowed to relax, along with the box sizes, before a
349 < minimum energy was calculated. Carbon monoxide, equivalent to 50\%
350 < coverage on one side of the metal system was added in a c(2x4) arrangement
351 < and again allowed to relax before a minimum energy was calculated.
337 > \subsection{Forcefield validation}
338 > The CO-metal cross interactions were compared directly to DFT results
339 > found in the supporting information of Tao {\it et al.}
340 > \cite{Tao:2010} These calculations are estimates of the stabilization
341 > energy provided to double-layer reconstructions of the perfect 557
342 > surface by an overlayer of CO molecules in a $c (2 \times 4)$ pattern.
343 > To make the comparison, metal slabs that were five atoms thick and
344 > which displayed a 557 facet were constructed.  Double-layer
345 > (reconstructed) systems were created using six atomic layers where
346 > enough of a layer was removed from both exposed 557 facets to create
347 > the double step.  In all cases, the metal slabs contained 480 atoms
348 > and were minimized using steepest descent under the EAM force
349 > field. Both the bare metal slabs and slabs with 50\% carbon monoxide
350 > coverage (arranged in the $c (2 \times 4)$ pattern) were used.  The
351 > systems are periodic along and perpendicular to the step-edge axes
352 > with a large vacuum above the displayed 557 facet.
353  
354 < Energies for the various systems are displayed in Table ~\ref{tab:steps}. Examining
355 < the Pt systems first, it is apparent that the double layer system is slightly less stable
356 < then the original single step. However, upon addition of carbon monoxide, the
357 < stability is reversed and the double layer system becomes more stable. This result
358 < is in agreement with DFT calculations in Tao {\it et al.}\cite{Tao:2010}, who also show
359 < that the addition of CO leads to a reversal in the most stable system. While our
360 < results agree qualitatively, quantitatively, they are approximately an order of magnitude
361 < different. Looking at additional stability per atom in kcal/mol, the DFT calculations suggest
362 < an increased stability of 0.1 kcal/mol per Pt atom, whereas we are seeing closer to a 0.4 kcal/mol
363 < increase in stability per Pt atom.
363 <
364 < The gold systems show a much smaller energy difference between the single and double
365 < systems, likely arising from their lower energy per atom values. Additionally, the weaker
366 < binding of CO to Au is evidenced by the much smaller energy change between the two systems,
367 < when compared to the Pt results. This limited change helps explain our lack of any reconstruction
368 < on the Au systems.
354 > Energies using our force field for the various systems are displayed
355 > in Table ~\ref{tab:steps}.  The relative energies are calculated as
356 > $E_{relative} = E_{system} - E_{M-557-S} - N_{CO} E_{CO-M}$,
357 > where $E_{CO-M}$ is -1.84 eV for CO-Pt and -0.39 eV for CO-Au. For
358 > platinum, the bare double layer is slightly less stable then the
359 > original single (557) step. However, addition of carbon monoxide
360 > stabilizes the reconstructed double layer relative to the perfect 557.
361 > This result is in qualitative agreement with DFT calculations in Tao
362 > {\it et al.}\cite{Tao:2010}, who also showed that the addition of CO
363 > leads to a reversal in stability.
364  
365 + The DFT calculations suggest an increased stability of 0.08 kcal/mol
366 + (0.7128 eV) per Pt atom for going from the single to double step
367 + structure in the presence of carbon monoxide.
368  
369 + The gold systems show much smaller energy differences between the
370 + single and double layers. The weaker binding of CO to Au is evidenced
371 + by the much smaller change in relative energy between the structures
372 + when carbon monoxide is present.  Additionally, as CO-Au binding is
373 + much weaker than CO-Pt, it would be unlikely that CO would approach
374 + the 50\% coverage levels operating temperatures for the gold surfaces.
375 +
376   %Table of single step double step calculations
377   \begin{table}[H]
378 < \caption{Minimized single point energies of unit cell crystals displaying (S)ingle or (D)double steps. Systems are periodic along and perpendicular to the step-edge axes with a large vacuum above the displayed 557 facet. The addition of CO in a 50\% c(2x4) coverage acts as a stabilizing presence and suggests a driving force for the observed reconstruction on the highest coverage Pt system. All energies are in kcal/mol.}
378 >  \caption{Minimized single point energies of (S)ingle and (D)ouble
379 >    steps.  The addition of CO in a 50\% $c(2 \times 4)$ coverage acts as a
380 >    stabilizing presence and suggests a driving force for the observed
381 >    reconstruction on the highest coverage Pt system. All energies are
382 >    in kcal/mol.}
383   \centering
384 < \begin{tabular}{| c | c | c | c | c | c | c |}
384 > \begin{tabular}{| c | c | c | c | c | c |}
385   \hline
386 < \textbf{Step} & \textbf{N}\textsubscript{M} & \textbf{N\textsubscript{CO}} & \textbf{Unit-Cell Energy} & \textbf{Energy per M} & \textbf{Energy per CO} & \textbf{Difference per M} \\
386 > \textbf{Step} & \textbf{N}\textsubscript{M} & \textbf{N\textsubscript{CO}} & \textbf{Relative Energy} & \textbf{$\Delta$E/M} & \textbf{$\Delta$E/CO} \\
387   \hline
388 < Pt(557)-S & 480 & 0 & -61142.624 & -127.381 & - & 0 \\
389 < Pt(557)-D & 480 & 0 & -61027.841 & -127.141 & - & 0.240 \\
390 < \hline
391 < Pt(557)-S & 480 & 40 & -62960.289 & -131.167 & -45.442 & 0 \\
383 < Pt(557)-D & 480 & 44 & -63040.007 & -131.333 & -45.731 & -0.166\\
388 > Pt(557)-S & 480 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - \\
389 > Pt(557)-D & 480 & 0 & 114.783 & 0.239 & -\\
390 > Pt(557)-S & 480 & 40 & -124.546 & -0.259 & -3.114\\
391 > Pt(557)-D & 480 & 44 & -34.953 & -0.073 & -0.794\\
392   \hline
393   \hline
394 < Au(557)-S & 480 & 0 & -41879.286 & -87.249 & - &0 \\
395 < Au(557)-D & 480 & 0 & -41799.714 & -87.084 & - & 0.165 \\
396 < \hline
397 < Au(557)-S & 480 & 40 & -42423.899 & -88.381 & -13.615 & 0 \\
390 < Au(557)-D & 480 & 44 & -42428.738 & -88.393 & -14.296 & -0.012 \\
394 > Au(557)-S & 480 & 0 & 0 & 0 & - \\
395 > Au(557)-D & 480 & 0 & 79.572 & 0.166 & - \\
396 > Au(557)-S & 480 & 40 & -157.199 & -0.327 & -3.930\\
397 > Au(557)-D & 480 & 44 & -123.297 & -0.257 & -2.802 \\
398   \hline
399   \end{tabular}
400   \label{tab:steps}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines