ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
Revision: 3811
Committed: Thu Dec 13 22:42:37 2012 UTC (11 years, 6 months ago) by jmichalk
Content type: application/x-tex
Original Path: trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex
File size: 20098 byte(s)
Log Message:
Working on simulation methodology, specifically cross interactions and the simulation protocol

File Contents

# Content
1 \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2 \usepackage{amsmath}
3 \usepackage{amssymb}
4 \usepackage{setspace}
5 \usepackage{endfloat}
6 \usepackage{caption}
7 %\usepackage{tabularx}
8 \usepackage{graphicx}
9 \usepackage{multirow}
10 %\usepackage{booktabs}
11 %\usepackage{bibentry}
12 %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
13 %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
14 \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
15 \usepackage{url}
16 \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
17 \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
18 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
19
20 % double space list of tables and figures
21 \AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
22 \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
23 \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
24
25 %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
26 \bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{;}
27 \bibliographystyle{achemso}
28
29 \begin{document}
30
31
32 %%
33 %Introduction
34 % Experimental observations
35 % Previous work on Pt, CO, etc.
36 %
37 %Simulation Methodology
38 % FF (fits and parameters)
39 % MD (setup, equilibration, collection)
40 %
41 % Analysis of trajectories!!!
42 %Discussion
43 % CO preferences for specific locales
44 % CO-CO interactions
45 % Differences between Au & Pt
46 % Causes of 2_layer reordering in Pt
47 %Summary
48 %%
49
50 %Title
51 \title{Investigation of the Pt and Au 557 Surface Reconstructions
52 under a CO Atmosphere}
53 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. MacIntyre and J. Daniel
54 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
55 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
56 University of Notre Dame\\
57 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
58 %Date
59 \date{Dec 15, 2012}
60 %authors
61
62 % make the title
63 \maketitle
64
65 \begin{doublespace}
66
67 \begin{abstract}
68
69 \end{abstract}
70
71 \newpage
72
73
74 \section{Introduction}
75 % Importance: catalytically active metals are important
76 % Sub: Knowledge of how their surface structure affects their ability to catalytically facilitate certain reactions is growing, but is more reactionary than predictive
77 % Sub: Designing catalysis is the future, and will play an important role in numerous processes (ones that are currently seen to be impractical, or at least inefficient)
78 % Theory can explore temperatures and pressures which are difficult to work with in experiments
79 % Sub: Also, easier to observe what is going on and provide reasons and explanations
80 %
81
82 Industrial catalysts usually consist of small particles exposing
83 different atomic terminations that exhibit a high concentration of
84 step, kink sites, and vacancies at the edges of the facets. These
85 sites are thought to be the locations of catalytic
86 activity.\cite{ISI:000083038000001,ISI:000083924800001} There is now
87 significant evidence to demonstrate that solid surfaces are often
88 structurally, compositionally, and chemically {\it modified} by
89 reactants under operating conditions.\cite{Tao2008,Tao:2010,Tao2011}
90 The coupling between surface oxidation state and catalytic activity
91 for CO oxidation on Pt, for instance, is widely
92 documented.\cite{Ertl08,Hendriksen:2002} Despite the well-documented
93 role of these effects on reactivity, the ability to capture or predict
94 them in atomistic models is currently somewhat limited. While these
95 effects are perhaps unsurprising on the highly disperse, multi-faceted
96 nanoscale particles that characterize industrial catalysts, they are
97 manifest even on ordered, well-defined surfaces. The Pt(557) surface,
98 for example, exhibits substantial and reversible restructuring under
99 exposure to moderate pressures of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
100
101 This work is part of an ongoing effort to understand the causes,
102 mechanisms and timescales for surface restructuring using molecular
103 simulation methods. Since the dynamics of the process is of
104 particular interest, we utilize classical molecular dynamic methods
105 with force fields that represent a compromise between chemical
106 accuracy and the computational efficiency necessary to observe the
107 process of interest.
108
109 Since restructuring occurs as a result of specific interactions of the catalyst
110 with adsorbates, two metals systems exposed to the same adsorbate, CO,
111 were examined in this work. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown to
112 reconstruct under certain conditions. The Au(557) surface will provide a
113 useful counterpoint
114
115 %Platinum molecular dynamics
116 %gold molecular dynamics
117
118
119
120
121
122
123 \section{Simulation Methods}
124 The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface problem is the
125 development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
126 model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
127 adsorbates. Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
128 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
129 molecular dynamics
130 (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
131 methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
132 mechanical potential energy surfaces remain out of reach.
133 Additionally, the ``bonds'' between metal atoms at a surface are
134 typically not well represented in terms of classical pairwise
135 interactions in the same way that bonds in a molecular material are,
136 nor are they captured by simple non-directional interactions like the
137 Coulomb potential. For this work, we have been using classical
138 molecular dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are
139 specifically tuned for transition metals. In particular, we use the
140 EAM potential for Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions, while modeling the CO
141 using a model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
142 photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and Pt-CO
143 cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
144
145 \subsection{Metal-metal interactions}
146 Many of the potentials used for classical simulation of transition
147 metals are based on a non-pairwise additive functional of the local
148 electron density. The embedded atom method (EAM) is perhaps the best
149 known of these
150 methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
151 but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
152 the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
153 parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al.} is among the
154 fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
155 all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
156 core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
157 calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
158 the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
159 atomic sites is computed at atom $i$'s location,
160 \begin{equation*}
161 \bar{\rho}_i = \sum_{j\neq i} \rho_j(r_{ij})
162 \end{equation*}
163 Here, $\rho_j(r_{ij})$ is the function that describes the distance
164 dependence of the valence electron distribution of atom $j$. The
165 contribution to the potential that comes from placing atom $i$ at that
166 location is then
167 \begin{equation*}
168 V_i = F[ \bar{\rho}_i ] + \sum_{j \neq i} \phi_{ij}(r_{ij})
169 \end{equation*}
170 where $F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]$ is an energy embedding functional, and
171 $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is an pairwise term that is meant to represent the
172 overlap of the two positively charged cores.
173
174 The {\it modified} embedded atom method (MEAM) adds angular terms to
175 the electron density functions and an angular screening factor to the
176 pairwise interaction between two
177 atoms.\cite{BASKES:1994fk,Lee:2000vn,Thijsse:2002ly,Timonova:2011ve}
178 MEAM has become widely used to simulate systems in which angular
179 interactions are important (e.g. silicon,\cite{Timonova:2011ve} bcc
180 metals,\cite{Lee:2001qf} and also interfaces.\cite{Beurden:2002ys})
181 MEAM presents significant additional computational costs, however.
182
183 The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, MEAM, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen potentials
184 have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
185 simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
186 properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
187 melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
188 fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
189 propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
190 dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} All of these potentials have their
191 strengths and weaknesses. One of the strengths common to all of the
192 methods is the relatively large library of metals for which these
193 potentials have been
194 parameterized.\cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}
195
196 \subsection{CO}
197 Since one explanation for the strong surface CO repulsion on metals is
198 the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide, the model
199 chosen for this molecule exhibits this property in an efficient
200 manner. We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
201 the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
202 Karplus model is a rigid three site model which places a massless M
203 site at the center of mass along the CO bond. The geometry along with the interaction
204 parameters are reproduced in Table 1. The effective dipole moment is still
205 small (0.35 D) while the linear quadrupole (-2.40 D~\AA) is close
206 to the experimental (-2.63 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO} and quantum mechanical predictions (-2.46 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCOCalc}.
207 %CO Table
208 \begin{table}[H]
209 \caption{Positions, $\sigma$, $\epsilon$ and charges for CO geometry and self-interactions\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are in kcal/mol, and charges are in $e$.}
210 \centering
211 \begin{tabular}{| c | c | ccc |}
212 \hline
213 \multicolumn{5}{|c|}{\textbf{Self-Interactions}}\\
214 \hline
215 & r & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & q\\
216 \hline
217 \textbf{C} & 0.0 & 0.0262 & 3.83 & -0.75 \\
218 \textbf{O} & 1.13 & 0.1591 & 3.12 & -0.85 \\
219 \textbf{M} & 0.6457 & - & - & 1.6 \\
220 \hline
221 \end{tabular}
222 \end{table}
223
224 \subsection{Cross-Interactions}
225
226 One hurdle that must be overcome in classical molecular simulations
227 is the proper parameterization of all of the potential interactions present
228 in the system. CO adsorbed on a platinum surface has been the focus of
229 many experimental \cite{Yeo, Hopster:1978, Ertl:1977, Kelemen:1979} and theoretical studies.
230 \cite{Beurden:2002ys,Pons:1986,Deshlahra:2009,Feibelman:2001,Mason:2004}
231 We started with parameters reported by Korzeniewski et al. \cite{Pons:1986} and then
232 modified them to ensure that the Pt-CO interaction favored
233 an atop binding position for the CO upon the Pt surface. Following the method
234 laid out by Korzeniewski, the Pt-C interaction was fit to a strong
235 Lennard-Jones 12-6 interaction to mimic binding, while the Pt-O interaction
236 was parameterized to a Morse potential. The resultant potential-energy
237 surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-CO bond length (1.1 \AA)\cite{Deshlahra:2012} and affinity
238 for the atop binding position.\cite{Deshlahra:2012, Hopster:1978}
239
240 The Au-C and Au-O interaction parameters were fit to a Lennard-Jones and Morse potential respectively. The binding energies were obtained from quantum calculations carried out using <functional> for gold.
241
242 Numerous single point calculations were performed at various distances of the CO
243
244
245
246 \subsection{Construction and Equilibration of 557 Metal interfaces}
247
248 Our model systems are composed of approximately 4000 metal atoms cut along the 557 plane. The bare crystals were initially run in the Canonical ensemble at 1000K and 800K respectively for Pt and Au. The difference in temperature is necessary because of the two metals different melting points. Various amounts of CO were added to the simulation box and allowed to absorb to the metal surfaces over a short period of 100 ps. After further thermal relaxation the simulations were all run for at least 40 ns. A subset of the runs that showed interesting effects were allowed to run longer. The system
249
250
251 Our model systems are composed of approximately 4000 metal atoms cut along the 557 plane. This cut creates a stepped surface of 6x(111) surface plateaus separated by a single (100) atomic step height. The abundance of low-coordination atoms along the step edges acts as a suitable model for industrial catalysts which tend to have a high concentration of high-index sites. Experimental work has shown that such surfaces are notable for reconstructing upon adsorption\cite{}. Reconstructions have been seen for the Pt 557 surface that involve doubling of the step height and further formation of nano clusters with a triangular motif \cite{doi:10.1126/science.1182122}. To shed insight on whether this reconstruction is limited to the platinum surface, simulations of gold under similar conditions will also be examined. To properly observe these changes, our system size needs to be greater than the periodic phenomena we are examining. The large size and the long time scales needed precluded us from using quantum approaches. Thus, a forcefield describing the Metal-Metal, CO-CO, and CO-Metal interactions was parameterized and the simulations were run using OpenMD\cite{} an open-source molecular dynamics package.
252
253
254
255
256 %\subsection{System}
257 %Once equilibration was reached, the systems were exposed to various sub-monolayer coverage of CO: $0, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{3},\frac{1}{2}$. The CO was started many \AA~above the surface with random velocity and rotational velocity vectors sampling from a Gaussian distribution centered on the temperature of the equilibrated metal block. Full adsorption occurred over the period of approximately 10 ps for Pt, while the binding energy between Au and CO is smaller and led to an incomplete adsorption. The metal-metal interactions were treated using the Embedded Atom Method while the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions were fit to experimental data and quantum calculations. The raised temperature helped shorten the length of the simulations by allowing the activation barrier of reconstruction to be more easily overcome. A few runs at lower temperatures showed the very beginnings of reconstructions, but their simulation lengths limited their usefulness.
258
259
260 %Table of Parameters
261 %Pt Parameter Set 9
262 %Au Parameter Set 35
263 \begin{table}[H]
264 \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-adsorbate interactions. Distances are in \AA~and energies are in kcal/mol}
265 \centering
266 \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | c | ccc |}
267 \hline
268 \multicolumn{7}{| c |}{\textbf{Cross-Interactions} }\\
269 \hline
270 & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & & $r$ & $D$ & $\gamma$ \\
271 \hline
272 \textbf{Pt-C} & 1.3 & 15 & \textbf{Pt-O} & 3.8 & 3.0 & 1 \\
273 \textbf{Au-C} & 1.9 & 6.5 & \textbf{Au-O} & 3.8 & 0.37 & 0.9\\
274
275 \hline
276 \end{tabular}
277 \end{table}
278
279 %Table of energies
280 \begin{table}[H]
281 \caption{Adsorption energies in eV}
282 \centering
283 \begin{tabular}{| c | cc |}
284 \hline
285 & Calc. & Exp. \\
286 \hline
287 \textbf{Pt-CO} & -1.9 & -1.4~\cite{Kelemen:1979}-- -1.9~\cite{Yeo} \\
288 \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.44~\cite{TPD_Gold_CO} \\
289 \hline
290 \end{tabular}
291 \end{table}
292
293
294
295
296
297
298 % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
299 \section{Results}
300 \subsection{Diffusion}
301 While an ideal metallic surface is unlikely to experience much surface diffusion, high-index surfaces have large numbers of low-coordinated atoms which have a much easier time overcoming the energetic barriers limiting diffusion, leading to easier surface reconstructions. Surface movement was divided between the parallel ($\parallel$) and perpendicular ($\perp$) directions relative to the step edge. We were then able to calculate diffusion constants as a function of CO coverage. As can be seen in Table 4, the presence and amount of CO directly affects the diffusion constants of surface platinum atoms. The presence of two 50\% coverage systems is to show how the diffusion process is affected by time. The majority of the systems were run for approximately 50 ns while the half monolayer system been running continuously. The lowered diffusion constant at longer run times will be examined in-depth in the discussion section.
302
303 %Table of Diffusion Constants
304 %Add gold?M
305 \begin{table}[H]
306 \caption{Platinum diffusion constants parallel and perpendicular to the 557 step edge. As the coverage increases, the diffusion constants parallel and perpendicular to the step edge both initially increase and then decrease slightly. There were two approaches of analysis. One looking at the surface atoms that had moved more than a prescribed amount over the run time and the other looking at all surface atoms. Units are \AA\textsuperscript{2}/ns}
307 \centering
308 \begin{tabular}{| c | ccc | ccc | c |}
309 \hline
310 \textbf{System Coverage} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & \textbf{Atoms} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & \textbf{Atoms} & \textbf{Time (ns)}\\
311 \hline
312 &\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\textbf{Mobile}}&\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\textbf{Surface Atoms}} & \\
313 \hline
314 50\% & 3.74 & 0.89 & 497 & 2.05 & 0.49 & 912 & 116 \\
315 50\% & 5.81 & 1.59 & 365 & 2.41 & 0.68 & 912 & 46 \\
316 33\% & 6.73 & 2.47 & 332 & 2.51 & 0.93 & 912 & 46 \\
317 25\% & 5.38 & 2.04 & 361 & 2.18 & 0.84 & 912 & 46 \\
318 5\% & 5.54 & 0.63 & 230 & 1.44 & 0.19 & 912 & 46 \\
319 0\% & 3.53 & 0.61 & 282 & 1.11 & 0.22 & 912 & 56 \\
320 \hline
321 50\%-r & 6.91 & 2.00 & 198 & 2.23 & 0.68 & 925 & 25\\
322 0\%-r & 4.73 & 0.27 & 128 & 0.72 & 0.05 & 925 & 43\\
323 \hline
324 \end{tabular}
325 \end{table}
326
327
328
329 %Discussion
330 \section{Discussion}
331 Comparing the results from simulation to those reported previously by Tao et al. the similarities in the platinum and CO system are quite strong. As shown in figure 1, the simulated platinum system under a CO atmosphere will restructure slightly by doubling the terrace heights. The restructuring appears to occur slowly, one to two platinum atoms at a time. Looking at individual snapshots, these adatoms tend to either rise on top of the plateau or break away from the step edge and then diffuse perpendicularly to the step direction until reaching another step edge. This combination of growth and decay of the step edges appears to be in somewhat of a state of dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in figure 1.B, this point tends to act as a focus or growth point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a zipper. From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed during the simulation. Measuring from the initial appearance of a growth point, the double layer tends to be fully formed within $\sim$~35 ns.
332
333 \subsection{Diffusion}
334 As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step edge tends to be much faster than that perpendicular to the step edge. Additionally, the coverage of CO appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Table 4. Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step edge, will allow for a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the more likely a growth point is to be formed. One driving force behind this reconstruction appears to be the lowering of surface energy that occurs by doubling the terrace widths. (I'm not really proving this... I have the surface flatness to show it, but surface energy?)
335 \\
336 \\
337 %Evolution of surface
338 \begin{figure}[H]
339 \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
340 \caption{Four snapshots at various times a) 258 ps b) 19 ns c) 31.2 ns d) 86.1 ns. Slight disruption of the surface occurs fairly quickly. However, the doubling of the layers seems to be very dependent on the initial linking of two separate step edges. The focal point in b, appears to be a growth spot for the rest of the double layer.}
341 \end{figure}
342
343
344
345
346 %Peaks!
347 \includegraphics[scale=0.25]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
348 \section{Conclusion}
349
350
351 \section{Acknowledgments}
352 Support for this project was provided by the National Science
353 Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
354 Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
355 Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
356
357 \newpage
358 \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
359 \end{doublespace}
360 \end{document}