ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/COonPtAu.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex (file contents):
Revision 3802 by jmichalk, Wed Dec 5 17:47:27 2012 UTC vs.
Revision 3876 by jmichalk, Fri Mar 15 12:51:01 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
2 <
3 < \usepackage{setspace}
1 > \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 > \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 > \usepackage{achemso}
4 > \usepackage{caption}
5   \usepackage{float}
6 < \usepackage{cite}
7 < \usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
8 < \usepackage[font=small,labelfont=bf]{caption}
6 > \usepackage{geometry}
7 > \usepackage{natbib}
8 > \usepackage{setspace}
9 > \usepackage{xkeyval}
10 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11 > \usepackage{amsmath}
12 > \usepackage{amssymb}
13 > \usepackage{times}
14 > \usepackage{mathptm}
15 > \usepackage{setspace}
16 > \usepackage{endfloat}
17 > \usepackage{caption}
18 > \usepackage{tabularx}
19 > \usepackage{longtable}
20 > \usepackage{graphicx}
21 > \usepackage{multirow}
22 > \usepackage{multicol}
23  
24 + \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
25 + % \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
26 + \usepackage{url}
27 + \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
28 + \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
29 + 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
30 +
31 + % double space list of tables and figures
32 + %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcomand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
33 + \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
34 + \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
35 + % \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
36 +
37 + %\citestyle{nature}
38 + % \bibliographystyle{achemso}
39 +
40 + \title{Molecular Dynamics simulations of the surface reconstructions
41 +  of Pt(557) and Au(557) under exposure to CO}
42 +
43 + \author{Joseph R. Michalka}
44 + \author{Patrick W. McIntyre}
45 + \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
46 + \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
47 + \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
48 +  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
49 +  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
50 +
51 + \keywords{}
52 +
53 + \begin{document}
54 +
55 +
56   %%
57   %Introduction
58   %       Experimental observations
# Line 25 | Line 72
72   %%
73  
74  
75 + \begin{abstract}
76 + We examine surface reconstructions of Pt and Au(557) under
77 + various CO coverages using molecular dynamics in order to
78 + explore possible mechanisms for any observed reconstructions
79 + and their dynamics. The metal-CO interactions were parameterized
80 + as part of this work so that an efficient large-scale treatment of
81 + this system could be undertaken. The large difference in binding
82 + strengths of the metal-CO interactions was found to play a significant
83 + role with regards to step-edge stability and adatom diffusion. A
84 + small correlation between coverage and the diffusion constant
85 + was also determined. The energetics of CO adsorbed to the surface
86 + is sufficient to explain the reconstructions observed on the Pt
87 + systems and the lack  of reconstruction of the Au systems.
88  
89 < \begin{document}
30 < %Title
31 < \title{Investigation of the Pt and Au 557 Surface Reconstructions under a CO Atmosphere}
32 < %Date
33 < \date{Dec 15,  2012}
34 < %authors
35 < \author{Joseph R.~Michalka, Patrick W. McIntyre, \& J.~Daniel Gezelter}
36 < % make the title
37 < \maketitle
89 > \end{abstract}
90  
91 < \doublespacing
91 > \newpage
92  
93  
42
94   \section{Introduction}
95   % Importance: catalytically active metals are important
96   %       Sub: Knowledge of how their surface structure affects their ability to catalytically facilitate certain reactions is growing, but is more reactionary than predictive
# Line 48 | Line 99
99   %       Sub: Also, easier to observe what is going on and provide reasons and explanations
100   %
101  
102 + Industrial catalysts usually consist of small particles that exhibit a
103 + high concentration of steps, kink sites, and vacancies at the edges of
104 + the facets.  These sites are thought to be the locations of catalytic
105 + activity.\cite{ISI:000083038000001,ISI:000083924800001} There is now
106 + significant evidence that solid surfaces are often structurally,
107 + compositionally, and chemically modified by reactants under operating
108 + conditions.\cite{Tao2008,Tao:2010,Tao2011} The coupling between
109 + surface oxidation states and catalytic activity for CO oxidation on
110 + Pt, for instance, is widely documented.\cite{Ertl08,Hendriksen:2002}
111 + Despite the well-documented role of these effects on reactivity, the
112 + ability to capture or predict them in atomistic models is somewhat
113 + limited.  While these effects are perhaps unsurprising on the highly
114 + disperse, multi-faceted nanoscale particles that characterize
115 + industrial catalysts, they are manifest even on ordered, well-defined
116 + surfaces. The Pt(557) surface, for example, exhibits substantial and
117 + reversible restructuring under exposure to moderate pressures of
118 + carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
119  
120 < High-index surfaces of catalytically active metals are an important area of exploration because they are typically more reactive than an ideal surface of the same metal. The greater number of low-coordinated surface atoms is likely responsible for this increased reactivity \cite{}. Additionally, the activity and specificity of many metals towards certain chemical processes has been shown to strongly depend on the structure of the surface \cite{}. Prior work has also shown that reaction conditions: high pressures, temperatures, etc. are able to cause reconstructions of the surface, either through changing the displayed surface facets or by changing the number and types of high-index sites available for reactions \cite{doi:10.1126/science.1197461,doi:10.1021/nn3015322, doi:10.1021/jp302379x}. A greater understanding of these high-index surfaces and the restructuring processes they undergo is needed as a prerequisite for more intelligent catalyst design. While current experimental work has started exploring systems at \emph{in situ} conditions, for a long time such experiments were limited to ideal surfaces in high vacuum. New techniques, such as ambient pressure XPS (AP-XPS) \cite{}, high-pressure XPS (HP-XPS) \cite{}, high-pressure STM \cite{}, environmental transmission electron microscopy (E-TEM) \cite{} and many others, are giving a clearer picture of what processes are occurring on metal surfaces when exposed to \emph{in situ} conditions. But all of these techniques still have difficulties, especially in observing what is occurring on the surfaces at an atomic level. Theoretical models and simulations in combination with experiment have proven their worth in explaining the underlying reasons for some of these reconstructions \cite{}.
121 < \\
122 < By examining two different metal-CO systems the effect the metal and the metal-CO interaction plays can be elucidated. Our first system is composed of Platinum and CO and has been the subject of many experimental and theoretical studies primarily because of Platinum's strong reactivity toward CO oxidation. The focus has primarily been on absorption energies, preferred absorption sites, and catalytic activities. The second system we examined is composed of Gold and CO. The Gold-CO interaction is much weaker than the Platinum-CO interaction and it seems likely that this difference in attraction would lead to differences in any potential surface reconstructions.
123 < %It has also been a good test for new quantum methods because of the difficulty with modeling the preference CO has for the atop binding site \cite{doi:10.1021/jp002302t}.
124 < %Now that dynamic surface events are known to play a role in many catalytic systems, additional research is being done to more closely examine many systems. Recent work by Tao et al. \cite{doi:10.1126/science.1182122} shows that a high-index platinum surface will undergo surface reconstructions when exposed to a small amount of CO, $\sim$~1 torr. Unexpectedly,  the reconstruction was metastable and reverted upon removal of the CO. Work by McCarthy et al. \cite{doi:10.1021/jp302379x} examined temperature programmed desorption's of CO from various Platinum samples and saw that species which had large amounts of low-coordinated surface atoms, highly sputtered surfaces or small nano particles, developed a higher temperature desorption peak, suggesting that binding of CO to the Platinum surface is strongly dependent on local geometry.
120 > This work is an investigation into the mechanism and timescale for
121 > surface restructuring using molecular simulations.  Since the dynamics
122 > of the process are of particular interest, we employ classical force
123 > fields that represent a compromise between chemical accuracy and the
124 > computational efficiency necessary to simulate the process of interest.
125 > Since restructuring typically occurs as a result of specific interactions of the
126 > catalyst with adsorbates, in this work, two metal systems exposed
127 > to carbon monoxide were examined. The Pt(557) surface has already been shown
128 > to undergo a large scale reconstruction under certain conditions.\cite{Tao:2010}
129 > The Au(557) surface, because of a weaker interaction with CO, is seen as less
130 > likely to undergo this kind of reconstruction. However, Peters et al.\cite{Peters:2000}
131 > and Piccolo et al.\cite{Piccolo:2004} have both observed CO-induced
132 > reconstruction of a Au(111) surface. Peters et al. saw a relaxation to the
133 > 22 x $\sqrt{3}$ cell. They argued that only a few Au atoms
134 > become adatoms, limiting the stress of this reconstruction while
135 > allowing the rest to relax and approach the ideal (111)
136 > configuration. They did not see the usual herringbone pattern being greatly
137 > affected by this relaxation. Piccolo et al. on the other hand, did see a
138 > disruption of the herringbone pattern as CO was adsorbed to the
139 > surface. Both groups suggested that the preference CO shows for
140 > low-coordinated Au atoms was the primary driving force for the reconstruction.
141  
142  
143  
144 + %Platinum molecular dynamics
145 + %gold molecular dynamics
146  
61
147   \section{Simulation Methods}
148 < Our model systems are composed of nearly 4000 metal atoms cut along the 557 plane. This cut creates a stepped surface of 6x(111) surface plateaus separated by a single (100) atomic step height. The large number of low-coordination atoms along the step edges provide a suitable model for industrial catalysts which tend to have a prevalence of lower CN, i.e. more reactive, sites. Drawing from experimental conclusions, the reconstructions seen for the Pt 557 surface involve doubling of the step height and the formation of triangular motifs along the steps \cite{doi:10.1126/science.1182122}. To properly observe these changes, our system size need to be greater than the periodic phenomena we are examining. The large size and the long time scales needed precluded us from using expensive quantum approaches. Thus, a forcefield describing the Metal-Metal, CO-CO, and CO-Metal interactions was parameterized.
149 < %Metal
150 < \subsection{Metal}
151 < Recent metallic forcefields, inspired by density-functional theory, including EAM\cite{doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983} and QSC\cite{} have become very popular for modeling novel metallic systems.  What makes these forcefields more suitable for metals than their pair-wise predecessors is that they work with the total electron density of the system in a manner akin to DFT. The energy contributed by a single atom is a function of the total background electron density at the point where the atom is to be embedded. The density at any given point is well-approximated by a linear superposition of the electron density as contributed by all the other atoms in the system. This description of the embedding energy allows this method to more accurately treat surfaces, alloys, and other non-bulk systems. The function describing the energy as related to the density is parameterized for each element, rather than by solving the Kohn-Sham equations which is what allows this method to be used for large systems. The embedding energy is completely enclosed within the functional $F_i[\rho_{h,i}]$ which is dependent on the host density $\rho_{h}$ at atom $i$. The density at $i$ is the sum of the density as generated by the rest of the metal. The $\phi_{ij}$ term is a purely repulsive pair-pair interaction parameterized from effective charge repulsions.
152 < %Can I increase the \sum size, not sure how...
153 < \begin{equation}
154 < E_{tot} = \sum_i F_i[\rho_{h,i}] + \frac{1}{2}\sum_i\sum_{j(\ne i)} \phi_{ij}(R_{ij})
155 < \end{equation}
156 < \begin{equation}
157 < \rho_{h,i} = \sum_{j (\ne i)} \rho_j^a(R_{ij})
158 < \end{equation}
159 < The EAM functional forms are used to model the Au and Pt self-interactions in all of our simulations.
160 < %CO
161 < \subsection{CO}
162 < Our CO model was obtained from work done by Karplus and Straub\cite{}. In their description of the biological importance of CO they developed an accurate quadrupolar model of CO which we make use of in this work. It has been suggested that the strong electrostatic repulsion that arises from this linear quadrupole may play an important role in the restructuring of metal surfaces to which CO is bound\cite{}.
148 > The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface is the
149 > development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
150 > model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
151 > adsorbates.  Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
152 > 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
153 > molecular dynamics
154 > (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
155 > methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
156 > mechanical potential energy surfaces remain out of reach.
157 > Additionally, the ``bonds'' between metal atoms at a surface are
158 > typically not well represented in terms of classical pairwise
159 > interactions in the same way that bonds in a molecular material are,
160 > nor are they captured by simple non-directional interactions like the
161 > Coulomb potential.  For this work, we have used classical molecular
162 > dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are specifically tuned
163 > for transition metals.  In particular, we used the EAM potential for
164 > Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions\cite{EAM}. The CO was modeled using a rigid
165 > three-site model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
166 > photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and
167 > Pt-CO cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
168 >  
169 > \subsection{Metal-metal interactions}
170 > Many of the potentials used for modeling transition metals are based
171 > on a non-pairwise additive functional of the local electron
172 > density. The embedded atom method (EAM) is perhaps the best known of
173 > these
174 > methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
175 > but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
176 > the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
177 > parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi et al. is among the
178 > fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
179 > all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
180 > core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
181 > calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
182 > the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
183 > atomic sites is computed at atom $i$'s location,
184 > \begin{equation*}
185 > \bar{\rho}_i = \sum_{j\neq i} \rho_j(r_{ij})
186 > \end{equation*}
187 > Here, $\rho_j(r_{ij})$ is the function that describes the distance
188 > dependence of the valence electron distribution of atom $j$. The
189 > contribution to the potential that comes from placing atom $i$ at that
190 > location is then
191 > \begin{equation*}
192 > V_i =  F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]  + \sum_{j \neq i} \phi_{ij}(r_{ij})
193 > \end{equation*}
194 > where $F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]$ is an energy embedding functional, and
195 > $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is a pairwise term that is meant to represent the
196 > repulsive overlap of the two positively charged cores.  
197 >
198 > % The {\it modified} embedded atom method (MEAM) adds angular terms to
199 > % the electron density functions and an angular screening factor to the
200 > % pairwise interaction between two
201 > % atoms.\cite{BASKES:1994fk,Lee:2000vn,Thijsse:2002ly,Timonova:2011ve}
202 > % MEAM has become widely used to simulate systems in which angular
203 > % interactions are important (e.g. silicon,\cite{Timonova:2011ve} bcc
204 > % metals,\cite{Lee:2001qf} and also interfaces.\cite{Beurden:2002ys})
205 > % MEAM presents significant additional computational costs, however.
206 >
207 > The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen (QSC) potentials
208 > have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
209 > simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
210 > properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
211 > melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
212 > fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
213 > propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
214 > dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} One of EAM's strengths
215 > is its sensitivity to small changes in structure. This arises
216 > from the original parameterization, where the interactions
217 > up to the third nearest neighbor were taken into account.\cite{Voter95a}
218 > Comparing that to the glue model of Ercolessi et al.\cite{Ercolessi88}
219 > which is only parameterized up to the nearest-neighbor
220 > interactions, EAM is a suitable choice for systems where
221 > the bulk properties are of secondary importance to low-index
222 > surface structures. Additionally, the similarity of EAMs functional
223 > treatment of the embedding energy to standard density functional
224 > theory (DFT) makes fitting DFT-derived cross potentials with adsorbates somewhat easier.
225 > \cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}  
226 >
227 >
228 >
229 >
230 > \subsection{Carbon Monoxide model}
231 > Previous explanations for the surface rearrangements center on
232 > the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}  
233 > We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
234 > the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin because it reproduces
235 > the quadrupole moment well.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
236 > Karplus model treats CO as a rigid three site molecule with a massless M
237 > site at the molecular center of mass. The geometry and interaction
238 > parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:CO}. The effective
239 > dipole moment, calculated from the assigned charges, is still
240 > small (0.35 D) while the linear quadrupole (-2.40 D~\AA) is close
241 > to the experimental (-2.63 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCO} and quantum
242 > mechanical predictions (-2.46 D~\AA)\cite{QuadrupoleCOCalc}.
243   %CO Table
244   \begin{table}[H]
245 < \caption{$\sigma$, $\epsilon$ and charges for CO self-interactions\cite{}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are in kcal/mol, and charges are in $e$.}
245 >  \caption{Positions, Lennard-Jones parameters ($\sigma$ and
246 >    $\epsilon$), and charges for the CO-CO
247 >    interactions in Ref.\bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\cite{Straub}. Distances are in \AA, energies are
248 >    in kcal/mol, and charges are in atomic units.}
249   \centering
250 < \begin{tabular}{| c | ccc |}
250 > \begin{tabular}{| c | c | ccc |}
251   \hline
252 < \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{\textbf{Self-Interactions}}\\
252 > &  {\it z} & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & q\\
253   \hline
254 < &  $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & q\\
254 > \textbf{C} & -0.6457 &  3.83 & 0.0262   &   -0.75 \\
255 > \textbf{O} &  0.4843 &  3.12 &  0.1591  &   -0.85 \\
256 > \textbf{M} & 0.0 & -  &  -  &    1.6 \\
257   \hline
88 \textbf{C} &  0.0262  & 3.83   &   -0.75 \\
89 \textbf{O} &   0.1591 &   3.12 &   -0.85 \\
90 \textbf{M} & -  &  -  &    1.6 \\
91 \hline
258   \end{tabular}
259 + \label{tab:CO}
260   \end{table}
94 %Cross
95 \subsection{Cross-Interactions}
96 To finish the forcefield, the cross-interactions between the metals and the CO needed to be parameterized. Previous attempts at parameterization have used two different functional forms to model these interactions\cite{}. A LJ model was fit for the Metal-Carbon interaction and a Morse potential was parameterized for the Metal-Oxygen interaction. The parameter sets chosen, as shown in Table 2, did a suitable job at reproducing experimental adsorption energies as shown in Table 3, but more importantly, they were able to capture the binding site preference. The Pt-CO parameters show a slight preference for the atop binding site which matches the experimental observations.
261  
262 + \subsection{Cross-Interactions between the metals and carbon monoxide}
263  
264 + Since the adsorption of CO onto a Pt surface has been the focus
265 + of much experimental \cite{Yeo, Hopster:1978, Ertl:1977, Kelemen:1979}
266 + and theoretical work
267 + \cite{Beurden:2002ys,Pons:1986,Deshlahra:2009,Feibelman:2001,Mason:2004}
268 + there is a significant amount of data on adsorption energies for CO on
269 + clean metal surfaces. An earlier model by Korzeniewski {\it et
270 +  al.}\cite{Pons:1986} served as a starting point for our fits. The parameters were
271 + modified to ensure that the Pt-CO interaction favored the atop binding
272 + position on Pt(111). These parameters are reproduced in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters}.
273 + The modified parameters yield binding energies that are slightly higher
274 + than the experimentally-reported values as shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}. Following Korzeniewski
275 + et al.,\cite{Pons:1986} the Pt-C interaction was fit to a deep
276 + Lennard-Jones interaction to mimic strong, but short-ranged partial
277 + binding between the Pt $d$ orbitals and the $\pi^*$ orbital on CO. The
278 + Pt-O interaction was modeled with a Morse potential with a large
279 + equilibrium distance, ($r_o$).  These choices ensure that the C is preferred
280 + over O as the surface-binding atom. In most cases, the Pt-O parameterization contributes a weak
281 + repulsion which favors the atop site.  The resulting potential-energy
282 + surface suitably recovers the calculated Pt-C separation length
283 + (1.6~\AA)\cite{Beurden:2002ys} and affinity for the atop binding
284 + position.\cite{Deshlahra:2012, Hopster:1978}
285  
286 + %where did you actually get the functionals for citation?
287 + %scf calculations, so initial relaxation was of the four layers, but two layers weren't kept fixed, I don't think
288 + %same cutoff for slab and slab + CO ? seems low, although feibelmen had values around there...
289 + The Au-C and Au-O cross-interactions were also fit using Lennard-Jones and
290 + Morse potentials, respectively, to reproduce Au-CO binding energies.
291 + The limited experimental data for CO adsorption on Au required refining the fits against plane-wave DFT calculations.
292 + Adsorption energies were obtained from gas-surface DFT calculations with a
293 + periodic supercell plane-wave basis approach, as implemented in the
294 + {\sc Quantum ESPRESSO} package.\cite{QE-2009} Electron cores were
295 + described with the projector augmented-wave (PAW)
296 + method,\cite{PhysRevB.50.17953,PhysRevB.59.1758} with plane waves
297 + included to an energy cutoff of 20 Ry. Electronic energies are
298 + computed with the PBE implementation of the generalized gradient
299 + approximation (GGA) for gold, carbon, and oxygen that was constructed
300 + by Rappe, Rabe, Kaxiras, and Joannopoulos.\cite{Perdew_GGA,RRKJ_PP}
301 + In testing the Au-CO interaction, Au(111) supercells were constructed of four layers of 4
302 + Au x 2 Au surface planes and separated from vertical images by six
303 + layers of vacuum space. The surface atoms were all allowed to relax
304 + before CO was added to the system. Electronic relaxations were
305 + performed until the energy difference between subsequent steps
306 + was less than $10^{-8}$ Ry.   Nonspin-polarized supercell calculations
307 + were performed with a 4~x~4~x~4 Monkhorst-Pack {\bf k}-point sampling of the first Brillouin
308 + zone.\cite{Monkhorst:1976} The relaxed gold slab was
309 + then used in numerous single point calculations with CO at various
310 + heights (and angles relative to the surface) to allow fitting of the
311 + empirical force field.
312  
313 < %\subsection{System}
314 < %Once equilibration was reached, the systems were exposed to various sub-monolayer coverage of CO: $0, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{3},\frac{1}{2}$. The CO was started many \AA~above the surface with random velocity and rotational velocity vectors sampling from a Gaussian distribution centered on the temperature of the equilibrated metal block.  Full adsorption occurred over the period of approximately 10 ps for Pt, while the binding energy between Au and CO is smaller and led to an incomplete adsorption. The metal-metal interactions were treated using the Embedded Atom Method while the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions were fit to experimental data and quantum calculations. The raised temperature helped shorten the length of the simulations by allowing the activation barrier of reconstruction to be more easily overcome. A few runs at lower temperatures showed the very beginnings of reconstructions, but their simulation lengths limited their usefulness.
313 > %Hint at future work
314 > The parameters employed for the metal-CO cross-interactions in this work
315 > are shown in Table~\ref{tab:co_parameters} and the binding energies on the
316 > (111) surfaces are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:co_energies}.  Charge transfer
317 > and polarization are neglected in this model, although these effects are likely to
318 > affect binding energies and binding site preferences, and will be addressed in
319 > future work.
320  
104
321   %Table  of Parameters
322   %Pt Parameter Set 9
323   %Au Parameter Set 35
324   \begin{table}[H]
325 < \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-adsorbate interactions. Distances are in \AA~and energies are in kcal/mol}
325 >  \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-CO cross-interactions. Metal-C
326 >    interactions are modeled with Lennard-Jones potentials. While the
327 >    metal-O interactions were fit to Morse
328 >    potentials.  Distances are given in \AA~and energies in kcal/mol. }
329   \centering
330   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | c | ccc |}
331   \hline
332 < \multicolumn{7}{| c |}{\textbf{Cross-Interactions} }\\
332 > &  $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & & $r$ & $D$ & $\gamma$ (\AA$^{-1}$) \\
333   \hline
115 &  $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & & $r$ & $D$ & $\gamma$ \\
116 \hline
334   \textbf{Pt-C} & 1.3 & 15  & \textbf{Pt-O} & 3.8 & 3.0 & 1 \\
335   \textbf{Au-C} & 1.9 & 6.5  & \textbf{Au-O} & 3.8 & 0.37 & 0.9\\
336  
337   \hline
338   \end{tabular}
339 + \label{tab:co_parameters}
340   \end{table}
341  
342   %Table of energies
343   \begin{table}[H]
344 < \caption{Absorption energies in eV}
344 >  \caption{Adsorption energies for a single CO at the atop site on M(111) at the atop site using the potentials
345 >    described in this work.  All values are in eV.}
346   \centering
347   \begin{tabular}{| c | cc |}
348 < \hline
349 < & Calc. & Exp. \\
350 < \hline
351 < \textbf{Pt-CO} & -1.9 & -1.4~\cite{Kelemen}-- -1.9~\cite{Yeo} \\
352 < \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.44~\cite{TPD_Gold_CO} \\
353 < \hline
348 >  \hline
349 >  & Calculated & Experimental \\
350 >  \hline
351 >  \multirow{2}{*}{\textbf{Pt-CO}} & \multirow{2}{*}{-1.9} & -1.4 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}
352 >  (Ref. \protect\cite{Kelemen:1979}) \\
353 > & &  -1.9 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} (Ref. \protect\cite{Yeo}) \\ \hline
354 >  \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.40 \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,}  (Ref. \protect\cite{TPDGold}) \\
355 >  \hline
356   \end{tabular}
357 + \label{tab:co_energies}
358   \end{table}
359  
360 + \subsection{Pt(557) and Au(557) metal interfaces}
361 + Our Pt system is an orthorhombic periodic box of dimensions
362 + 54.482~x~50.046~x~120.88~\AA~while our Au system has
363 + dimensions of 57.4~x~51.9285~x~100~\AA.
364 + The systems are arranged in a FCC crystal that have been cut
365 + along the (557) plane so that they are periodic in the {\it x} and
366 + {\it y} directions, and have been oriented to expose two aligned
367 + (557) cuts along the extended {\it z}-axis.  Simulations of the
368 + bare metal interfaces at temperatures ranging from 300~K to
369 + 1200~K were performed to confirm the relative
370 + stability of the surfaces without a CO overlayer.  
371  
372 + The different bulk melting temperatures (1345~$\pm$~10~K for Au\cite{Au:melting}
373 + and $\sim$~2045~K for Pt\cite{Pt:melting}) suggest that any possible reconstruction should happen at
374 + different temperatures for the two metals.  The bare Au and Pt surfaces were
375 + initially run in the canonical (NVT) ensemble at 800~K and 1000~K
376 + respectively for 100 ps. The two surfaces were relatively stable at these
377 + temperatures when no CO was present, but experienced increased surface
378 + mobility on addition of CO. Each surface was then dosed with different concentrations of CO
379 + that was initially placed in the vacuum region.  Upon full adsorption,
380 + these concentrations correspond to 0\%, 5\%, 25\%, 33\%, and 50\% surface
381 + coverage. Higher coverages resulted in the formation of a double layer of CO,
382 + which introduces artifacts that are not relevant to (557) reconstruction.
383 + Because of the difference in binding energies, nearly all of the CO was bound to the Pt surface, while
384 + the Au surfaces often had a significant CO population in the gas
385 + phase.  These systems were allowed to reach thermal equilibrium (over
386 + 5~ns) before being run in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble for
387 + data collection. All of the systems examined had at least 40~ns in the
388 + data collection stage, although simulation times for some Pt of the
389 + systems exceeded 200~ns.  Simulations were carried out using the open
390 + source molecular dynamics package, OpenMD.\cite{Ewald,OOPSE}
391  
392  
393  
394  
395 < % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
395 > % RESULTS
396 > %
397   \section{Results}
398 < \subsection{Diffusion}
399 < While an ideal metallic surface is unlikely to experience much surface diffusion, high-index surfaces have large numbers of low-coordinated atoms which have a much easier time overcoming the energetic barriers limiting diffusion, leading to easier surface reconstructions. Surface movement was divided between the parallel ($\parallel$) and perpendicular ($\perp$) directions relative to the step edge. We were then able to calculate diffusion constants as a function of CO coverage. As can be seen in Table 4, the presence and amount of CO directly affects the diffusion constants of surface Platinum atoms. The presence of two 50\% coverage systems is to show how the diffusion process is affected by time. The majority of the systems were run for approximately 50 ns while the half monolayer system been running continuously. The lowered diffusion constant at longer run times will be examined in-depth in the discussion section.
398 > \subsection{Structural remodeling}
399 > The surfaces of both systems, upon dosage of CO, began
400 > to undergo extensive remodeling that was not observed in the bare
401 > systems. The bare metal surfaces
402 > experienced minor roughening of the step-edge because
403 > of the elevated temperatures, but the
404 > (557) lattice was well-maintained throughout the simulation
405 > time. The Au systems were limited to greater amounts of
406 > roughening, i.e. breakup of the step-edge, and some step
407 > wandering. The lower coverage Pt systems experienced
408 > similar restructuring but to a greater extent when
409 > compared to the Au systems. The 50\% coverage
410 > Pt system was unique among our simulations in that it
411 > formed numerous double layers through step coalescence,
412 > similar to results reported by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
413 >
414 >
415 > \subsubsection{Step wandering}
416 > The 0\% coverage surfaces for both metals showed minimal
417 > movement at their respective run temperatures. As the CO
418 > coverage increased however, the mobility of the surface,
419 > described through adatom diffusion and step-edge wandering,
420 > also increased.  Except for the 50\% Pt system, the step-edges
421 > did not coalesce in any of the other simulations, instead
422 > preferring to keep nearly the same distance between steps
423 > as in the original (557) lattice, $\sim$13\AA for Pt and $\sim$14\AA for Au.
424 > Previous work by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994}
425 > highlights the repulsion that exists between step-edges even
426 > when no direct interactions are present in the system. This
427 > repulsion arises because step-edge crossing is not allowed
428 > which constrains the entropy. This entropic repulsion does
429 > not completely define the interactions between steps, which
430 > is why some surfaces will undergo step coalescence, where
431 > additional attractive interactions can overcome the repulsion.\cite{Williams:1991}
432 > The presence and concentration of adsorbates, as shown in
433 > this work, can affect these step interactions, potentially leading
434 > to a new surface structure as the thermodynamic minimum.
435  
436 < %Table of Diffusion Constants
437 < %Add gold?M
438 < \begin{table}[H]
439 < \caption{Platinum diffusion constants parallel and perpendicular to the 557 step edge. As the coverage increases, the diffusion constants parallel and  perpendicular to the step edge both initially increase and then decrease slightly. There were two approaches of analysis. One looking at the surface atoms that had moved more than a prescribed amount over the run time and the other looking at all surface atoms. Units are \AA\textsuperscript{2}/ns}
440 < \centering
441 < \begin{tabular}{| c | ccc | ccc | c |}
442 < \hline
443 < \textbf{System Coverage} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & \textbf{Atoms} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & \textbf{Atoms} & \textbf{Time (ns)}\\
444 < \hline
445 < &\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\textbf{Mobile}}&\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\textbf{Surface Atoms}} & \\
446 < \hline
447 < 50\% & 3.74 & 0.89 & 497 & 2.05 & 0.49 & 912 & 116 \\
448 < 50\% & 5.81 & 1.59 & 365 & 2.41 & 0.68 & 912 & 46   \\
449 < 33\% & 6.73 & 2.47 & 332 & 2.51 & 0.93 & 912 & 46   \\
450 < 25\% & 5.38 & 2.04 & 361 & 2.18 & 0.84 & 912 & 46  \\
451 < 5\% & 5.54 & 0.63 & 230 & 1.44 & 0.19 & 912 & 46  \\
452 < 0\% & 3.53 & 0.61 & 282 & 1.11 & 0.22 & 912 & 56  \\
453 < \hline
454 < 50\%-r & 6.91 & 2.00 & 198 & 2.23 & 0.68  & 925 & 25\\
455 < 0\%-r  & 4.73 & 0.27 & 128 & 0.72 & 0.05 & 925 & 43\\
456 < \hline
169 < \end{tabular}
170 < \end{table}
436 > \subsubsection{Double layers}
437 > Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} have shown experimentally that the Pt(557) surface
438 > undergoes two separate reconstructions upon CO adsorption.\cite{Tao:2010}
439 > The first involves a doubling of the step height and plateau length.
440 > Similar behavior has been seen on numerous surfaces
441 > at varying conditions: Ni(977), Si(111).\cite{Williams:1994,Williams:1991,Pearl}
442 > Of the two systems we examined, the Pt system showed a greater
443 > propensity for reconstruction when compared to the Au system
444 > because of the larger surface mobility and extent of step wandering.
445 > The amount of reconstruction is strongly correlated to the amount of CO
446 > adsorbed upon the surface.  This appears to be related to the
447 > effect that adsorbate coverage has on edge breakup and on the
448 > surface diffusion of metal adatoms. While both systems displayed
449 > step-edge wandering, only the 50\% Pt surface underwent the
450 > doubling seen by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010} within the time scales studied here.
451 > Over longer periods, (150~ns) two more double layers formed
452 > on this interface. Although double layer formation did not occur
453 > in the other Pt systems, they show more step-wandering and
454 > general roughening compared to their Au counterparts. The
455 > 50\% Pt system is highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct} at
456 > various times along the simulation showing the evolution of a double layer step-edge.
457  
458 + The second reconstruction on the Pt(557) surface observed by
459 + Tao involved the formation of triangular clusters that stretched
460 + across the plateau between two step-edges. Neither system, within
461 + the 40~ns time scale or the extended simulation time of 150~ns for
462 + the 50\% Pt system, experienced this reconstruction.
463  
464 + %Evolution of surface
465 + \begin{figure}[H]
466 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
467 + \caption{The Pt(557) / 50\% CO system at a sequence of times after
468 +  initial exposure to the CO: (a) 258~ps, (b) 19~ns, (c) 31.2~ns, and
469 +  (d) 86.1~ns. Disruption of the (557) step-edges occurs quickly.  The
470 +  doubling of the layers appears only after two adjacent step-edges
471 +  touch.  The circled spot in (b) nucleated the growth of the double
472 +  step observed in the later configurations.}
473 +  \label{fig:reconstruct}
474 + \end{figure}
475  
476 + \subsection{Dynamics}
477 + Previous atomistic simulations of stepped surfaces dealt largely
478 + with the energetics and structures at different conditions
479 + \cite{Williams:1991,Williams:1994}. Consequently, the most common
480 + technique utilized to date has been Monte Carlo sampling. Monte Carlo approaches give an efficient
481 + sampling of the equilibrium thermodynamic landscape at the expense
482 + of ignoring the dynamics of the system. Previous experimental work by Pearl and
483 + Sibener\cite{Pearl}, using STM, has been able to capture the coalescing
484 + of steps on Ni(977). The time scale of the image acquisition,
485 + $\sim$70~s/image provides an upper bound for the time required for
486 + the doubling to occur. By utilizing Molecular Dynamics we were able to probe the dynamics of these reconstructions and in this section we give data on dynamic and
487 + transport properties, e.g. diffusion, layer formation time, etc.
488 +
489 +
490 + \subsubsection{Transport of surface metal atoms}
491 + %forcedSystems/stepSeparation
492 + The movement or wandering of a step-edge is a cooperative effect
493 + arising from the individual movements of the atoms making up the steps. An ideal metal surface
494 + displaying a low index facet, (111) or (100), is unlikely to experience
495 + much surface diffusion because of the large energetic barrier that must
496 + be overcome to lift an atom out of the surface. The presence of step-edges and other surface features
497 + on higher-index facets provides a lower energy source for mobile metal atoms.
498 + Breaking away from the step-edge on a clean surface still imposes an
499 + energetic penalty around $\sim$~45 kcal/mol, but this is easier than lifting
500 + the same metal atom vertically out of the surface,  \textgreater~60 kcal/mol.
501 + The penalty lowers significantly when CO is present in sufficient quantities
502 + on the surface. For certain distributions of CO, see Figures \ref{fig:sketchGraphic} and \ref{fig:sketchEnergies}, the penalty can fall to as low as
503 + $\sim$~20 kcal/mol. Once an adatom exists on the surface, the barrier for
504 + diffusion is negligible ( \textless~4 kcal/mol for a Pt adatom). These adatoms are then
505 + able to explore the terrace before rejoining either their original step-edge or
506 + becoming a part of a different edge. It is a difficult process for an atom
507 + to traverse to a separate terrace although the presence of CO can lower the
508 + energy barrier required to lift or lower an adatom. By tracking the mobility of individual
509 + metal atoms on the Pt and Au surfaces we were able to determine the relative
510 + diffusion constants, as well as how varying coverages of CO affect the diffusion. Close
511 + observation of the mobile metal atoms showed that they were typically in
512 + equilibrium with the step-edges, dynamically breaking apart and rejoining the edges.
513 + At times, their motion was concerted and two or more adatoms would be
514 + observed moving together across the surfaces.
515 +
516 + A particle was considered ``mobile'' once it had traveled more than 2~\AA~
517 + between saved configurations of the system (typically 10-100 ps). An atom that was
518 + truly mobile would typically travel much greater distances than this, but the 2~\AA~cutoff
519 + was used to prevent swamping the diffusion data with the in-place vibrational
520 + movement of buried atoms. Diffusion on a surface is strongly affected by
521 + local structures and in this work, the presence of single and double layer
522 + step-edges causes the diffusion parallel to the step-edges to be larger than
523 + the diffusion perpendicular to these edges. Parallel and perpendicular
524 + diffusion constants are shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}.
525 +
526 + %Diffusion graph
527 + \begin{figure}[H]
528 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{DiffusionComparison_errorXY_remade_20ns.pdf}
529 + \caption{Diffusion constants for mobile surface atoms along directions
530 +  parallel ($\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$) and perpendicular
531 +  ($\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$) to the (557) step-edges as a function of CO
532 +  surface coverage.  Diffusion parallel to the step-edge is higher
533 +  than that perpendicular to the edge because of the lower energy
534 +  barrier associated with traversing along the edge as compared to
535 +  completely breaking away. The two reported diffusion constants for
536 +  the 50\% Pt system arise from different sample sets. The lower values
537 +  correspond to the same 40~ns amount that all of the other systems were
538 +  examined at, while the larger values correspond to a 20~ns period }
539 + \label{fig:diff}
540 + \end{figure}
541 +
542 + The lack of a definite trend in the Au diffusion data in Figure \ref{fig:diff} is likely due
543 + to the weaker bonding between Au and CO. This leads to a lower observed
544 + coverage ({\it x}-axis) when compared to dosage amount, which
545 + then further limits the effect the CO can have on surface diffusion. The correlation
546 + between coverage and Pt diffusion rates conversely shows a
547 + definite trend marred by the highest coverage surface. Two
548 + explanations arise for this drop. First, upon a visual inspection of
549 + the system, after a double layer has been formed, it maintains its
550 + stability strongly and is no longer a good source for adatoms and so
551 + atoms that had been tracked for mobility data have now been buried. By
552 + performing the same diffusion calculation but on a shorter run time
553 + (20~ns), only including data before the formation of the double layer, we obtain
554 + the larger values for both $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ and $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ at the 50\% coverage.
555 + This places the parallel diffusion constant more closely in line with the
556 + expected trend, while the perpendicular diffusion constant does not
557 + drop as far. A secondary explanation arising from our analysis of the
558 + mechanism of double layer formation focuses on the effect that CO on the
559 + surface has with respect to overcoming surface diffusion of Pt. If the
560 + coverage is too sparse, the Pt engages in minimal interactions and
561 + thus minimal diffusion. As coverage increases, there are more favorable
562 + arrangements of CO on the surface allowing the formation of a path,
563 + a minimum energy trajectory, for the adatom to explore the surface.
564 + As the CO is constantly moving on the surface, this path is constantly
565 + changing. If the coverage becomes too great, the paths could
566 + potentially be clogged leading to a decrease in diffusion despite
567 + their being more adatoms and step-wandering.
568 +
569 +
570 +
571 + \subsubsection{Dynamics of double layer formation}
572 + The increased diffusion on Pt at the higher
573 + CO coverages plays a primary role in double layer formation. However, this is not
574 + a complete explanation -- the 33\%~Pt system
575 + has higher diffusion constants but did not show
576 + any signs of edge doubling in the observed run time. On the
577 + 50\%~Pt system, one layer formed within the first 40~ns of simulation time, while two more were formed as the system was run for an additional
578 + 110~ns (150~ns total). Previous experimental
579 + work gives insight into the upper bounds of the
580 + time required for step coalescence.\cite{Williams:1991,Pearl}
581 + In this system, as seen in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the first
582 + appearance of a double layer, appears at 19~ns
583 + into the simulation. Within 12~ns of this nucleation event, nearly half of the step has
584 + formed the double layer and by 86~ns, the complete layer
585 + has been flattened out. The double layer could be considered
586 + ``complete" by 37~ns but remains a bit rough. From the
587 + appearance of the first nucleation event to the first observed double layer, the process took $\sim$20~ns. Another
588 + $\sim$40~ns was necessary for the layer to completely straighten.
589 + The other two layers in this simulation formed over periods of
590 + 22~ns and 42~ns respectively. Comparing this to the upper
591 + bounds of the image scan, it is likely that most aspects of this
592 + reconstruction occur very rapidly. A possible explanation
593 + for this rapid reconstruction is the elevated temperatures
594 + under which our systems were simulated. It is probable that the process would
595 + take longer at lower temperatures.
596 +
597 +
598 +
599 +
600 +
601 +
602 + %Sketch graphic of different configurations
603 + \begin{figure}[H]
604 + \includegraphics[width=0.8\linewidth, height=0.8\textheight]{COpathsSketch.pdf}
605 + \caption{The dark grey atoms refer to the upper ledge, while the white atoms are
606 + the lower terrace. The blue highlighted atoms had a CO in a vertical atop position
607 + upon them. These are a sampling of the configurations examined to gain a more
608 + complete understanding of the effects CO has on surface diffusion and edge breakup.
609 + Energies associated with each configuration are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:SketchEnergies}.}
610 + \label{fig:SketchGraphic}
611 + \end{figure}
612 +
613 + %energy graph corresponding to sketch graphic
614 + \begin{figure}[H]
615 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{stepSeparationComparison.pdf}
616 + \caption{The energy curves directly correspond to the labeled model
617 + surface in Figure \ref{fig:SketchGraphic}. All energy curves are relative
618 + to their initial configuration so the energy of a and h do not have the
619 + same zero value. As is seen, certain arrangements of CO can lower
620 + the energetic barrier that must be overcome to create an adatom.
621 + However, it is the highest coverages where these higher-energy
622 + configurations of CO will be more likely. }
623 + \label{fig:SketchEnergies}
624 + \end{figure}
625 +
626   %Discussion
627   \section{Discussion}
628 < Comparing the results from simulation to those reported previously by Tao et al. the similarities in the Platinum and CO system are quite strong. As shown in figure 1, the simulated platinum system under a CO atmosphere will restructure slightly by doubling the terrace heights. The restructuring appears to occur slowly, one to two Platinum atoms at a time. Looking at individual snapshots, these adatoms tend to either rise on top of the plateau or break away from the step edge and then diffuse perpendicularly to the step direction until reaching another step edge. This combination of growth and decay of the step edges appears to be in somewhat of a state of dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in figure 1.B, this point tends to act as a focus or growth point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a zipper. From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed during the simulation. Measuring from the initial appearance of a growth point, the double layer tends to be fully formed within $\sim$~35 ns.
628 > We have shown that the classical potential models are able to model the initial reconstruction of the
629 > Pt(557) surface upon CO adsorption as shown by Tao et al. \cite{Tao:2010}. More importantly, we
630 > were able to observe features of the dynamic processes necessary for this reconstruction.
631  
632   \subsection{Diffusion}
633 < As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step edge tends to be much faster than that perpendicular to the step edge. Additionally, the coverage of CO appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Table 4. Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step edge, will allow for a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the more likely a growth point is to be formed. One driving force behind this reconstruction appears to be the lowering of surface energy that occurs by doubling the terrace widths. (I'm not really proving this... I have the surface flatness to show it, but surface energy?)
634 < \\
635 < \\
636 < %Evolution of surface
633 > As shown in Figure \ref{fig:diff}, for the Pt systems, there
634 > is a strong trend toward higher diffusion constants as
635 > surface coverage of CO increases. The drop for the 50\%
636 > case being explained as double layer formation already
637 > beginning to occur in the analyzed 40~ns, which lowered
638 > the calculated diffusion rates. Between the parallel and
639 > perpendicular rates, the perpendicular diffusion constant
640 > appears to be the most important indicator of double layer
641 > formation. As highlighted in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}, the
642 > formation of the double layer did not begin until a nucleation
643 > site appeared. And as mentioned by Williams et al.\cite{Williams:1991, Williams:1994},
644 > the inability for edges to cross leads to an effective repulsion.
645 > This repulsion must be overcome to allow step coalescence.
646 > A greater $\textbf{D}_\perp$ implies more step-wandering
647 > and a larger chance for the stochastic meeting of two edges
648 > to form the nucleation point. Upon that appearance, parallel
649 > diffusion along the step-edge can help ``zipper'' up the double
650 > layer. This helps explain why the time scale for formation after
651 > the appearance of a nucleation site was rapid, while the initial
652 > appearance of said site was unpredictable.
653 >
654 > \subsection{Mechanism for restructuring}
655 > Since the Au surface showed no large scale restructuring throughout
656 > our simulation time our discussion will focus on the 50\% Pt-CO system
657 > which did undergo the doubling featured in Figure \ref{fig:reconstruct}.
658 > Similarities of our results to those reported previously by Tao et al.\cite{Tao:2010}
659 > are quite strong. The simulated Pt system exposed to a large dosage
660 > of CO readily restructures by doubling the terrace widths and step heights.
661 > The restructuring occurs in a piecemeal fashion, one to two Pt atoms at a
662 > time, but is rapid on experimental timescales. The adatoms either break
663 > away from the step-edge and stay on the lower terrace or they lift up onto
664 > a higher terrace. Once ``free'', they diffuse on the terrace until reaching
665 > another step-edge or rejoining their original edge. This combination of
666 > growth and decay of the step-edges is in a state of dynamic equilibrium.
667 > However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in Figure 1.B,
668 > this nucleates the rest of the edge to meet up, forming a double layer.
669 > From simulations which exhibit a double layer, the time delay from the
670 > initial appearance of a nucleation point to a fully formed double layer is $\sim$35~ns.
671 >
672 > A number of possible mechanisms exist to explain the role of adsorbed
673 > CO in restructuring the Pt surface. Quadrupolar repulsion between adjacent
674 > CO molecules adsorbed on the surface is one possibility.  However,
675 > the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction is short-ranged and is attractive for
676 > some orientations.  If the CO molecules are ``locked'' in a specific orientation
677 > relative to each other, through atop adsorption for example, this explanation
678 > gains some credence. The energetic repulsion between two CO located a
679 > distance of 2.77~\AA~apart (nearest-neighbor distance of Pt) and both in
680 > a vertical orientation, is 8.62 kcal/mol. Moving the CO apart to the second
681 > nearest-neighbor distance of 4.8~\AA~or 5.54~\AA~drops the repulsion to
682 > nearly 0 kcal/mol. Allowing the CO to rotate away from a purely vertical orientation
683 > also lowers the repulsion. A minimum of 6.2 kcal/mol is reached at when the
684 > angle between the 2 CO is $\sim$24\textsuperscript{o}, when the carbons are
685 > locked at a distance of 2.77 \AA apart. As mentioned above, the energy barrier
686 > for surface diffusion of a Pt adatom is only 4 kcal/mol. So this repulsion between
687 > neighboring CO molecules can increase the surface diffusion. However, the
688 > residence time of CO on Pt was examined and while the majority of the CO is
689 > on or near the surface throughout the run, the molecules are extremely mobile,
690 > with diffusion constants 40 to 2500 times larger, depending on coverage. This
691 > mobility suggests that the CO are more likely to shift their positions without
692 > necessarily the Pt along with them.
693 >
694 > Another possible and more likely mechanism for the restructuring is in the
695 > destabilization of strong Pt-Pt interactions by CO adsorbed on surface
696 > Pt atoms. To test this hypothesis, numerous configurations of
697 > CO in varying quantities were arranged on the higher and lower plateaus
698 > around a step on a otherwise clean Pt(557) surface. A few sample
699 > configurations are displayed in Figure \ref{fig:lambdaTable}, with
700 > energies at various positions along the path displayed in Table
701 > \ref{tab:rxcoord}. Certain configurations of CO, cases B and D for
702 > example, can have quite strong energetic reasons for breaking
703 > away from the step-edge. Although the packing of these configurations
704 > is unlikely until CO coverage has reached a high enough value.
705 > These examples are showing the most difficult cases, immediate
706 > adatom formation through breakage away from the step-edge, which
707 > is why their energies at large distances are relatively high. There are
708 > mechanistic paths where an edge atom could get shifted to onto the
709 > step-edge to form a small peak before fully breaking away. And again,
710 > once the adatom is formed, the barrier for diffusion on the surface is
711 > negligible. These sample configurations help explain CO's effect on
712 > general surface mobility and step wandering, but they are lacking in
713 > providing a mechanism for the formation of double layers. One possible
714 > mechanism is elucidated in Figure \ref{fig:lambda}, where a burrowing
715 > and lifting process of an adatom and step-edge atom respectively is
716 > examined. The system, without CO present, is nearly energetically
717 > neutral, whereas with CO present there is a $\sim$ 15 kcal/mol drop
718 > in the energy of the system.
719 >
720 > %lambda progression of Pt -> shoving its way into the step
721   \begin{figure}[H]
722 < \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
723 < \caption{Four snapshots at various times a) 258 ps b) 19 ns c) 31.2 ns d) 86.1 ns. Slight disruption of the surface occurs fairly quickly. However, the doubling of the layers seems to be very dependent on the initial linking of two separate step edges. The focal point in b, appears to be a growth spot for the rest of the double layer.}
722 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{lambdaProgression_atopCO_withLambda.png}
723 > \caption{A model system of the Pt(557) surface was used as the framework
724 > for exploring energy barriers along a reaction coordinate. Various numbers,
725 > placements, and rotations of CO were examined as they affect Pt movement.
726 > The coordinate displayed in this Figure was a representative run.  relative to the energy of the system at 0\%, there
727 > is a slight decrease upon insertion of the Pt atom into the step-edge along
728 > with the resultant lifting of the other Pt atom when CO is present at certain positions.}
729 > \label{fig:lambda}
730   \end{figure}
731  
732  
733  
734  
191 %Peaks!
192 \includegraphics[scale=0.25]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
193 \section{Conclusion}
735  
736 + %breaking of the double layer upon removal of CO
737 + \begin{figure}[H]
738 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doubleLayerBreaking_greenBlue_whiteLetters.png}
739 + \caption{(A)  0~ps, (B) 100~ps, (C) 1~ns, after the removal of CO. The presence of the CO
740 + helped maintain the stability of the double layer and upon removal the two layers break
741 + and begin separating. The separation is not a simple pulling apart however, rather
742 + there is a mixing of the lower and upper atoms at the edge.}
743 + \label{fig:breaking}
744 + \end{figure}
745  
746  
747  
748  
749 + %Peaks!
750 + %\begin{figure}[H]
751 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
752 + %\caption{At the initial formation of this double layer  ( $\sim$ 37 ns) there is a degree
753 + %of roughness inherent to the edge. The next $\sim$ 40 ns show the edge with
754 + %aspects of waviness and by 80 ns the double layer is completely formed and smooth. }
755 + %\label{fig:peaks}
756 + %\end{figure}
757  
758  
759 + %Don't think I need this
760 + %clean surface...
761 + %\begin{figure}[H]
762 + %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{557_300K_cleanPDF.pdf}
763 + %\caption{}
764  
765 + %\end{figure}
766 + %\label{fig:clean}
767  
768  
769 + \section{Conclusion}
770 + In this work we have shown the reconstruction of the Pt(557) crystalline surface upon adsorption of CO in less than a $\mu s$. Only the highest coverage Pt system showed this initial reconstruction similar to that seen previously. The strong interaction between Pt and CO and the limited interaction between Au and CO helps explain the differences between the two systems.
771  
772 < \end{document}
772 > %Things I am not ready to remove yet
773 >
774 > %Table of Diffusion Constants
775 > %Add gold?M
776 > % \begin{table}[H]
777 > %   \caption{}
778 > %   \centering
779 > % \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | cc | }
780 > %   \hline
781 > %   &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\textbf{Platinum}}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{\textbf{Gold}} \\
782 > %   \hline
783 > %   \textbf{Surface Coverage} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$  \\
784 > %   \hline
785 > %   50\% & 4.32(2) & 1.185(8)  & 1.72(2) & 0.455(6) \\
786 > %   33\% & 5.18(3)  & 1.999(5)  & 1.95(2) & 0.337(4)   \\
787 > %   25\% & 5.01(2)  & 1.574(4)  & 1.26(3) & 0.377(6) \\
788 > %   5\%   & 3.61(2)  & 0.355(2)  & 1.84(3)  & 0.169(4)  \\
789 > %   0\%   & 3.27(2)  & 0.147(4)  & 1.50(2)  & 0.194(2)   \\
790 > %   \hline
791 > % \end{tabular}
792 > % \end{table}
793 >
794 > \begin{acknowledgement}
795 > Support for this project was provided by the National Science
796 > Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
797 > Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
798 > Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
799 > \end{acknowledgement}
800 > \newpage
801 > \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
802 > %\end{doublespace}
803 >
804 > \begin{tocentry}
805 > %\includegraphics[height=3.5cm]{timelapse}
806 > \end{tocentry}
807 >
808 > \end{document}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines