ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/COonPt/firstTry.tex
Revision: 3808
Committed: Mon Dec 10 16:46:27 2012 UTC (11 years, 6 months ago) by gezelter
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 22314 byte(s)
Log Message:
FIrst round of edits

File Contents

# Content
1 \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2 \usepackage{amsmath}
3 \usepackage{amssymb}
4 \usepackage{setspace}
5 \usepackage{endfloat}
6 \usepackage{caption}
7 %\usepackage{tabularx}
8 \usepackage{graphicx}
9 \usepackage{multirow}
10 %\usepackage{booktabs}
11 %\usepackage{bibentry}
12 %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
13 %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
14 \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
15 \usepackage{url}
16 \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
17 \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
18 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
19
20 % double space list of tables and figures
21 \AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
22 \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
23 \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
24
25 %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
26 \bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{;}
27 \bibliographystyle{achemso}
28
29 \begin{document}
30
31
32 %%
33 %Introduction
34 % Experimental observations
35 % Previous work on Pt, CO, etc.
36 %
37 %Simulation Methodology
38 % FF (fits and parameters)
39 % MD (setup, equilibration, collection)
40 %
41 % Analysis of trajectories!!!
42 %Discussion
43 % CO preferences for specific locales
44 % CO-CO interactions
45 % Differences between Au & Pt
46 % Causes of 2_layer reordering in Pt
47 %Summary
48 %%
49
50 %Title
51 \title{Investigation of the Pt and Au 557 Surface Reconstructions
52 under a CO Atmosphere}
53 \author{Joseph R. Michalka, Patrick W. MacIntyre and J. Daniel
54 Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu} \\
55 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
56 University of Notre Dame\\
57 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
58 %Date
59 \date{Dec 15, 2012}
60 %authors
61
62 % make the title
63 \maketitle
64
65 \begin{doublespace}
66
67 \begin{abstract}
68
69 \end{abstract}
70
71 \newpage
72
73
74 \section{Introduction}
75 % Importance: catalytically active metals are important
76 % Sub: Knowledge of how their surface structure affects their ability to catalytically facilitate certain reactions is growing, but is more reactionary than predictive
77 % Sub: Designing catalysis is the future, and will play an important role in numerous processes (ones that are currently seen to be impractical, or at least inefficient)
78 % Theory can explore temperatures and pressures which are difficult to work with in experiments
79 % Sub: Also, easier to observe what is going on and provide reasons and explanations
80 %
81
82 Industrial catalysts usually consist of small particles exposing
83 different atomic terminations that exhibit a high concentration of
84 step, kink sites, and vacancies at the edges of the facets. These
85 sites are thought to be the locations catalytic
86 activity.\cite{ISI:000083038000001,ISI:000083924800001} There is now
87 significant evidence to demonstrate that solid surfaces are often
88 structurally, compositionally, and chemically {\it modified} by
89 reactants under operating conditions.\cite{Tao2008,Tao:2010,Tao2011}
90 The coupling between surface oxidation state and catalytic activity
91 for CO oxidation on Pt, for instance, is widely
92 documented.\cite{Ertl08,Hendriksen:2002} Despite the well-documented
93 role of these effects on reactivity, the ability to capture or predict
94 them in atomistic models is currently somewhat limited. While these
95 effects are perhaps unsurprising on the highly disperse, multi-faceted
96 nanoscale particles that characterize industrial catalysts, they are
97 manifest even on ordered, well-defined surfaces. The Pt(557) surface,
98 for example, exhibits substantial and reversible restructuring under
99 exposure to moderate pressures of carbon monoxide.\cite{Tao:2010}
100
101 This work is part of an ongoing effort to understand the causes,
102 mechanisms and timescales for surface restructuring using molecular
103 simulation methods. Since the dynamics of the process is of
104 particular interest, we utilize classical molecular dynamic methods
105 with force fields that represent a compromise between chemical
106 accuracy and the computational efficiency necessary to observe the
107 process of interest.
108
109 High-index surfaces of catalytically active metals are an important area of exploration because they are typically more reactive than an ideal surface of the same metal. The greater number of low-coordinated surface atoms is believed responsible for this increased reactivity \cite{}. Additionally, the activity and specificity of many metals towards certain chemical processes has been shown to strongly depend on the structure of the surface \cite{}. Prior work has also shown that reaction conditions, such as high pressures and high temperatures are able to cause reconstructions of the metallic surface, either through changing the displayed surface facets or by changing the number and types of high-index sites available for reactions \cite{doi:10.1126/science.1197461,doi:10.1021/nn3015322, doi:10.1021/jp302379x}. A greater understanding of these high-index surfaces and the restructuring processes they undergo is needed as a prerequisite for more intelligent catalyst design. While current experimental work has started exploring systems at \emph{in situ} conditions, for a long time such experiments were limited to ideal surfaces in high vacuum. New techniques, such as ambient pressure XPS (AP-XPS) \cite{}, high-pressure XPS (HP-XPS) \cite{}, high-pressure STM \cite{}, environmental transmission electron microscopy (E-TEM) \cite{} and many others, are providing clearer pictures of the processes that are occurring on metal surfaces under these conditions. Nevertheless, all of these techniques still have limitations, especially in observing what is occurring at an atomic level. Theoretical models and simulations in combination with experiment have proven their worth in explaining the underlying reasons for some of these reconstructions \cite{}.
110 \\
111 By examining two different metal-CO systems the effect that the metal and the metal-CO interaction plays can be elucidated. Our first system is composed of platinum and CO and has been the subject of many experimental and theoretical studies primarily because of platinum's strong reactivity toward CO oxidation. The focus has primarily been on adsorption energies, preferred adsorption sites, and catalytic activities. The second system we examined is composed of gold and CO. The gold-CO interaction is much weaker than the platinum-CO interaction and it seems likely that this difference in attraction would lead to differences in any potential surface reconstructions.
112 %It has also been a good test for new quantum methods because of the difficulty with modeling the preference CO has for the atop binding site \cite{doi:10.1021/jp002302t}.
113 %Now that dynamic surface events are known to play a role in many catalytic systems, additional research is being done to more closely examine many systems. Recent work by Tao et al. \cite{doi:10.1126/science.1182122} shows that a high-index platinum surface undergoes surface reconstructions when exposed to a small amount of CO, $\sim$~1 torr. Unexpectedly, the reconstruction was metastable and reverted upon removal of the CO. Work by McCarthy et al. \cite{doi:10.1021/jp302379x} examined temperature programmed desorption's of CO from various platinum samples and saw that species which had large amounts of low-coordinated surface atoms, highly sputtered surfaces or small nano particles, developed a higher temperature desorption peak, suggesting that binding of CO to the platinum surface is strongly dependent on local geometry.
114
115
116
117
118
119 \section{Simulation Methods}
120 The challenge in modeling any solid/gas interface problem is the
121 development of a sufficiently general yet computationally tractable
122 model of the chemical interactions between the surface atoms and
123 adsorbates. Since the interfaces involved are quite large (10$^3$ -
124 10$^6$ atoms) and respond slowly to perturbations, {\it ab initio}
125 molecular dynamics
126 (AIMD),\cite{KRESSE:1993ve,KRESSE:1993qf,KRESSE:1994ul} Car-Parrinello
127 methods,\cite{CAR:1985bh,Izvekov:2000fv,Guidelli:2000fy} and quantum
128 mechanical potential energy surfaces remain out of reach.
129 Additionally, the ``bonds'' between metal atoms at a surface are
130 typically not well represented in terms of classical pairwise
131 interactions in the same way that bonds in a molecular material are,
132 nor are they captured by simple non-directional interactions like the
133 Coulomb potential. For this work, we have been using classical
134 molecular dynamics with potential energy surfaces that are
135 specifically tuned for transition metals. In particular, we use the
136 EAM potential for Au-Au and Pt-Pt interactions, while modeling the CO
137 using a model developed by Straub and Karplus for studying
138 photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Au-CO and Pt-CO
139 cross interactions were parameterized as part of this work.
140
141 \subsection{Metal-metal interactions}
142 Many of the potentials used for classical simulation of transition
143 metals are based on a non-pairwise additive functional of the local
144 electron density. The embedded atom method (EAM) is perhaps the best
145 known of these
146 methods,\cite{Daw84,Foiles86,Johnson89,Daw89,Plimpton93,Voter95a,Lu97,Alemany98}
147 but other models like the Finnis-Sinclair\cite{Finnis84,Chen90} and
148 the quantum-corrected Sutton-Chen method\cite{QSC,Qi99} have simpler
149 parameter sets. The glue model of Ercolessi {\it et al.} is among the
150 fastest of these density functional approaches.\cite{Ercolessi88} In
151 all of these models, atoms are conceptualized as a positively charged
152 core with a radially-decaying valence electron distribution. To
153 calculate the energy for embedding the core at a particular location,
154 the electron density due to the valence electrons at all of the other
155 atomic sites is computed at atom $i$'s location,
156 \begin{equation*}
157 \bar{\rho}_i = \sum_{j\neq i} \rho_j(r_{ij})
158 \end{equation*}
159 Here, $\rho_j(r_{ij})$ is the function that describes the distance
160 dependence of the valence electron distribution of atom $j$. The
161 contribution to the potential that comes from placing atom $i$ at that
162 location is then
163 \begin{equation*}
164 V_i = F[ \bar{\rho}_i ] + \sum_{j \neq i} \phi_{ij}(r_{ij})
165 \end{equation*}
166 where $F[ \bar{\rho}_i ]$ is an energy embedding functional, and
167 $\phi_{ij}(r_{ij})$ is an pairwise term that is meant to represent the
168 overlap of the two positively charged cores.
169
170 The {\it modified} embedded atom method (MEAM) adds angular terms to
171 the electron density functions and an angular screening factor to the
172 pairwise interaction between two
173 atoms.\cite{BASKES:1994fk,Lee:2000vn,Thijsse:2002ly,Timonova:2011ve}
174 MEAM has become widely used to simulate systems in which angular
175 interactions are important (e.g. silicon,\cite{Timonova:2011ve} bcc
176 metals,\cite{Lee:2001qf} and also interfaces.\cite{Beurden:2002ys})
177 MEAM presents significant additional computational costs, however.
178
179 The EAM, Finnis-Sinclair, MEAM, and the Quantum Sutton-Chen potentials
180 have all been widely used by the materials simulation community for
181 simulations of bulk and nanoparticle
182 properties,\cite{Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq}
183 melting,\cite{Belonoshko00,sankaranarayanan:155441,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr}
184 fracture,\cite{Shastry:1996qg,Shastry:1998dx} crack
185 propagation,\cite{BECQUART:1993rg} and alloying
186 dynamics.\cite{Shibata:2002hh} All of these potentials have their
187 strengths and weaknesses. One of the strengths common to all of the
188 methods is the relatively large library of metals for which these
189 potentials have been
190 parameterized.\cite{Foiles86,PhysRevB.37.3924,Rifkin1992,mishin99:_inter,mishin01:cu,mishin02:b2nial,zope03:tial_ap,mishin05:phase_fe_ni}
191
192 \subsection{CO}
193 Since one explanation for the strong surface CO repulsion on metals is
194 the large linear quadrupole moment of carbon monoxide, the model
195 chosen for this molecule exhibits this property in an efficient
196 manner. We used a model first proposed by Karplus and Straub to study
197 the photodissociation of CO from myoglobin.\cite{Straub} The Straub and
198 Karplus model is a rigid three site model which places a massless M
199 site WHERE? GEOMETRY NEEDED. The effective dipole moment is still
200 small (WHAT VALUE) while the linear quadrupole (WHAT VALUE) is close
201 to the quantum mechanical predicition (WHAT VALUE).
202 %CO Table
203 \begin{table}[H]
204 \caption{$\sigma$, $\epsilon$ and charges for CO self-interactions\cite{}. Distances are in \AA~, energies are in kcal/mol, and charges are in $e$.}
205 \centering
206 \begin{tabular}{| c | ccc |}
207 \hline
208 \multicolumn{4}{|c|}{\textbf{Self-Interactions}}\\
209 \hline
210 & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & q\\
211 \hline
212 \textbf{C} & 0.0262 & 3.83 & -0.75 \\
213 \textbf{O} & 0.1591 & 3.12 & -0.85 \\
214 \textbf{M} & - & - & 1.6 \\
215 \hline
216 \end{tabular}
217 \end{table}
218
219 \subsection{Cross-Interactions}
220 The cross-interactions between the metals and the CO needed to be parameterized. Previous attempts at parameterization have used two different functional forms to model these interactions\cite{}. A LJ model was fit for the Metal-Carbon interaction and a Morse potential was parameterized for the Metal-Oxygen interaction. The parameter sets chosen, as shown in Table 2, did a suitable job at reproducing experimental adsorption energies as shown in Table 3, but more importantly, they were able to capture the binding site preference. The Pt-CO parameters show a slight preference for the atop binding site which matches the experimental observations.
221
222 \subsection{Construction and Equilibration of 557 Metal interfaces}
223
224 Our model systems are composed of approximately 4000 metal atoms cut along the 557 plane. The bare crystals were initially run in the Canonical ensemble at 1000K and 800K respectively for Pt and Au. The difference in temperature is necessary because of the two metals different melting points. Various amounts of CO were added to the simulation box and allowed to absorb to the metal surfaces over a short period of 100 ps. After further thermal relaxation the simulations were all run for at least 40 ns. A subset of the runs that showed interesting effects were allowed to run longer. The system
225
226
227 Our model systems are composed of approximately 4000 metal atoms cut along the 557 plane. This cut creates a stepped surface of 6x(111) surface plateaus separated by a single (100) atomic step height. The abundance of low-coordination atoms along the step edges acts as a suitable model for industrial catalysts which tend to have a high concentration of high-index sites. Experimental work has shown that such surfaces are notable for reconstructing upon adsorption\cite{}. Reconstructions have been seen for the Pt 557 surface that involve doubling of the step height and further formation of nano clusters with a triangular motif \cite{doi:10.1126/science.1182122}. To shed insight on whether this reconstruction is limited to the platinum surface, simulations of gold under similar conditions will also be examined. To properly observe these changes, our system size needs to be greater than the periodic phenomena we are examining. The large size and the long time scales needed precluded us from using quantum approaches. Thus, a forcefield describing the Metal-Metal, CO-CO, and CO-Metal interactions was parameterized and the simulations were run using OpenMD\cite{} an open-source molecular dynamics package.
228
229
230
231
232 %\subsection{System}
233 %Once equilibration was reached, the systems were exposed to various sub-monolayer coverage of CO: $0, \frac{1}{10}, \frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{3},\frac{1}{2}$. The CO was started many \AA~above the surface with random velocity and rotational velocity vectors sampling from a Gaussian distribution centered on the temperature of the equilibrated metal block. Full adsorption occurred over the period of approximately 10 ps for Pt, while the binding energy between Au and CO is smaller and led to an incomplete adsorption. The metal-metal interactions were treated using the Embedded Atom Method while the Pt-CO and Au-CO interactions were fit to experimental data and quantum calculations. The raised temperature helped shorten the length of the simulations by allowing the activation barrier of reconstruction to be more easily overcome. A few runs at lower temperatures showed the very beginnings of reconstructions, but their simulation lengths limited their usefulness.
234
235
236 %Table of Parameters
237 %Pt Parameter Set 9
238 %Au Parameter Set 35
239 \begin{table}[H]
240 \caption{Best fit parameters for metal-adsorbate interactions. Distances are in \AA~and energies are in kcal/mol}
241 \centering
242 \begin{tabular}{| c | cc | c | ccc |}
243 \hline
244 \multicolumn{7}{| c |}{\textbf{Cross-Interactions} }\\
245 \hline
246 & $\sigma$ & $\epsilon$ & & $r$ & $D$ & $\gamma$ \\
247 \hline
248 \textbf{Pt-C} & 1.3 & 15 & \textbf{Pt-O} & 3.8 & 3.0 & 1 \\
249 \textbf{Au-C} & 1.9 & 6.5 & \textbf{Au-O} & 3.8 & 0.37 & 0.9\\
250
251 \hline
252 \end{tabular}
253 \end{table}
254
255 %Table of energies
256 \begin{table}[H]
257 \caption{Adsorption energies in eV}
258 \centering
259 \begin{tabular}{| c | cc |}
260 \hline
261 & Calc. & Exp. \\
262 \hline
263 \textbf{Pt-CO} & -1.9 & -1.4~\cite{Kelemen}-- -1.9~\cite{Yeo} \\
264 \textbf{Au-CO} & -0.39 & -0.44~\cite{TPD_Gold_CO} \\
265 \hline
266 \end{tabular}
267 \end{table}
268
269
270
271
272
273
274 % Just results, leave discussion for discussion section
275 \section{Results}
276 \subsection{Diffusion}
277 While an ideal metallic surface is unlikely to experience much surface diffusion, high-index surfaces have large numbers of low-coordinated atoms which have a much easier time overcoming the energetic barriers limiting diffusion, leading to easier surface reconstructions. Surface movement was divided between the parallel ($\parallel$) and perpendicular ($\perp$) directions relative to the step edge. We were then able to calculate diffusion constants as a function of CO coverage. As can be seen in Table 4, the presence and amount of CO directly affects the diffusion constants of surface platinum atoms. The presence of two 50\% coverage systems is to show how the diffusion process is affected by time. The majority of the systems were run for approximately 50 ns while the half monolayer system been running continuously. The lowered diffusion constant at longer run times will be examined in-depth in the discussion section.
278
279 %Table of Diffusion Constants
280 %Add gold?M
281 \begin{table}[H]
282 \caption{Platinum diffusion constants parallel and perpendicular to the 557 step edge. As the coverage increases, the diffusion constants parallel and perpendicular to the step edge both initially increase and then decrease slightly. There were two approaches of analysis. One looking at the surface atoms that had moved more than a prescribed amount over the run time and the other looking at all surface atoms. Units are \AA\textsuperscript{2}/ns}
283 \centering
284 \begin{tabular}{| c | ccc | ccc | c |}
285 \hline
286 \textbf{System Coverage} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & \textbf{Atoms} & $\mathbf{D}_{\parallel}$ & $\mathbf{D}_{\perp}$ & \textbf{Atoms} & \textbf{Time (ns)}\\
287 \hline
288 &\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\textbf{Mobile}}&\multicolumn{3}{c|}{\textbf{Surface Atoms}} & \\
289 \hline
290 50\% & 3.74 & 0.89 & 497 & 2.05 & 0.49 & 912 & 116 \\
291 50\% & 5.81 & 1.59 & 365 & 2.41 & 0.68 & 912 & 46 \\
292 33\% & 6.73 & 2.47 & 332 & 2.51 & 0.93 & 912 & 46 \\
293 25\% & 5.38 & 2.04 & 361 & 2.18 & 0.84 & 912 & 46 \\
294 5\% & 5.54 & 0.63 & 230 & 1.44 & 0.19 & 912 & 46 \\
295 0\% & 3.53 & 0.61 & 282 & 1.11 & 0.22 & 912 & 56 \\
296 \hline
297 50\%-r & 6.91 & 2.00 & 198 & 2.23 & 0.68 & 925 & 25\\
298 0\%-r & 4.73 & 0.27 & 128 & 0.72 & 0.05 & 925 & 43\\
299 \hline
300 \end{tabular}
301 \end{table}
302
303
304
305 %Discussion
306 \section{Discussion}
307 Comparing the results from simulation to those reported previously by Tao et al. the similarities in the platinum and CO system are quite strong. As shown in figure 1, the simulated platinum system under a CO atmosphere will restructure slightly by doubling the terrace heights. The restructuring appears to occur slowly, one to two platinum atoms at a time. Looking at individual snapshots, these adatoms tend to either rise on top of the plateau or break away from the step edge and then diffuse perpendicularly to the step direction until reaching another step edge. This combination of growth and decay of the step edges appears to be in somewhat of a state of dynamic equilibrium. However, once two previously separated edges meet as shown in figure 1.B, this point tends to act as a focus or growth point for the rest of the edge to meet up, akin to that of a zipper. From the handful of cases where a double layer was formed during the simulation. Measuring from the initial appearance of a growth point, the double layer tends to be fully formed within $\sim$~35 ns.
308
309 \subsection{Diffusion}
310 As shown in the results section, the diffusion parallel to the step edge tends to be much faster than that perpendicular to the step edge. Additionally, the coverage of CO appears to play a slight role in relative rates of diffusion, as shown in Table 4. Thus, the bottleneck of the double layer formation appears to be the initial formation of this growth point, which seems to be somewhat of a stochastic event. Once it appears, parallel diffusion, along the now slightly angled step edge, will allow for a faster formation of the double layer than if the entire process were dependent on only perpendicular diffusion across the plateaus. Thus, the larger $D_{\perp}$, the more likely a growth point is to be formed. One driving force behind this reconstruction appears to be the lowering of surface energy that occurs by doubling the terrace widths. (I'm not really proving this... I have the surface flatness to show it, but surface energy?)
311 \\
312 \\
313 %Evolution of surface
314 \begin{figure}[H]
315 \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{ProgressionOfDoubleLayerFormation_yellowCircle.png}
316 \caption{Four snapshots at various times a) 258 ps b) 19 ns c) 31.2 ns d) 86.1 ns. Slight disruption of the surface occurs fairly quickly. However, the doubling of the layers seems to be very dependent on the initial linking of two separate step edges. The focal point in b, appears to be a growth spot for the rest of the double layer.}
317 \end{figure}
318
319
320
321
322 %Peaks!
323 \includegraphics[scale=0.25]{doublePeaks_noCO.png}
324 \section{Conclusion}
325
326
327 \section{Acknowledgments}
328 Support for this project was provided by the National Science
329 Foundation under grant CHE-0848243 and by the Center for Sustainable
330 Energy at Notre Dame (cSEND). Computational time was provided by the
331 Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
332
333 \newpage
334 \bibliography{firstTryBibliography}
335 \end{doublespace}
336 \end{document}