ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/NPthiols/NPthiols.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/NPthiols/NPthiols.tex (file contents):
Revision 4359 by gezelter, Tue Oct 20 19:15:21 2015 UTC vs.
Revision 4360 by gezelter, Wed Oct 21 13:35:29 2015 UTC

# Line 529 | Line 529 | The computed corrugation factors are shown in Figure
529   dramatically inward ($c \rightarrow$ 1).
530  
531   The computed corrugation factors are shown in Figure
532 < \ref{fig:NPthiols_combo} for bare nanoparticles and for
532 > \ref{fig:NPthiols_corrugation} for bare nanoparticles and for
533   ligand-protected particles as a function of ligand chain length. The
534   largest nanoparticles are only slightly restructured by the presence
535   of ligands on the surface, while the smallest particle ($r$ = 10 \AA)
# Line 544 | Line 544 | covered with a half-monolayer of thiol ligands.
544      \AA ) particles show significant disruption to their crystal
545      structures, and the length and stiffness of the ligands is a
546      contributing factor to the surface disruption.}
547 <  \label{fig:NPthiols_combo}
548 < \end{figure}
549 <
550 < \begin{figure}
551 <  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/P2_3.pdf}
552 <  \caption{Computed ligand and interfacial solvent orientational $P_2$
553 <    values for 4 sizes of solvated nanoparticles that are bare or
554 <    protected with a 50\% coverage of C$_{4}$, C$_{8}$, or C$_{12}$
555 <    alkanethiolate ligands. Increasing stiffness of the ligand orients
556 <    these molecules normal to the particle surface, while the length
557 <    of the ligand chains works to prevent solvent from lying flat on
558 <    the surface.}
559 <  \label{fig:NPthiols_combo}
547 >  \label{fig:NPthiols_corrugation}
548   \end{figure}
549  
550   Because the thiolate ligands do not significantly alter the larger
# Line 613 | Line 601 | at the interface when ligands are added.
601   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
602   \subsection{Orientation of Ligand Chains}
603  
604 < As the ligand chain length increases in length, it exhibits
604 > As the saturated ligand chain length increases in length, it exhibits
605   significantly more conformational flexibility. Thus, different lengths
606   of ligands should favor different chain orientations on the surface of
607   the nanoparticle. To determine the distribution of ligand orientations
608 < relative to the particle surface we examine the probability of
609 < finding a ligand with a particular orientation relative to the surface
610 < normal of the nanoparticle,
608 > relative to the particle surface we examine the probability of finding
609 > a ligand with a particular orientation relative to the surface normal
610 > of the nanoparticle,
611   \begin{equation}
612   \cos{(\theta)}=\frac{\vec{r}_i\cdot\hat{u}_i}{|\vec{r}_i||\hat{u}_i|}
613   \end{equation}
# Line 637 | Line 625 | population at $\cos{(\theta)} = 0$.
625  
626   \begin{figure}
627    \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/NP_pAngle}
628 <  \caption{{\bf The two extreme cases of ligand orientation relative
629 <      to the nanoparticle surface: the ligand completely
630 <      outstretched ($\cos{(\theta)} = -1$) and the ligand fully
631 <      lying down on the particle surface ($\cos{(\theta)} = 0$).}}
628 >  \caption{The two extreme cases of ligand orientation relative to the
629 >    nanoparticle surface: the ligand completely outstretched
630 >    ($\cos{(\theta)} = -1$) and the ligand fully lying down on the
631 >    particle surface ($\cos{(\theta)} = 0$).}
632    \label{fig:NP_pAngle}
633   \end{figure}
634  
647
648
649 % \begin{figure}
650 %       \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/thiol_pAngle}
651 %       \caption{}
652 %       \label{fig:thiol_pAngle}
653 % \end{figure}
654
635   An order parameter describing the average ligand chain orientation relative to
636   the nanoparticle surface is available using the second order Legendre
637   parameter,
# Line 663 | Line 643 | layers will exhibit mean $P_2$ values of 0. As shown i
643   $P_2$ values of 1, while ligand populations lying flat on the
644   nanoparticle surface have $P_2$ values of $-0.5$. Disordered ligand
645   layers will exhibit mean $P_2$ values of 0. As shown in Figure
646 < \ref{fig:NPthiols_combo} the ligand $P_2$ values approaches 0 as
646 > \ref{fig:NPthiols_P2} the ligand $P_2$ values approaches 0 as
647   ligand chain length -- and ligand flexibility -- increases.
648  
649   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
# Line 701 | Line 681 | lengths.
681   bare particles, but are not as randomly oriented as the longer ligand
682   lengths.
683  
684 + \begin{figure}
685 +  \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{figures/P2_3.pdf}
686 +  \caption{Computed ligand and interfacial solvent orientational $P_2$
687 +    values for 4 sizes of solvated nanoparticles that are bare or
688 +    protected with a 50\% coverage of C$_{4}$, C$_{8}$, or C$_{12}$
689 +    alkanethiolate ligands. Increasing stiffness of the ligand orients
690 +    these molecules normal to the particle surface, while the length
691 +    of the ligand chains works to prevent solvent from lying flat on
692 +    the surface.}
693 +  \label{fig:NPthiols_P2}
694 + \end{figure}
695 +
696   These results are particularly interesting in light of our previous
697   results\cite{Stocker:2013cl}, where solvent molecules readily filled
698   the vertical gaps between neighboring ligand chains and there was a
# Line 798 | Line 790 | dramatically.
790   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
791   % **ACKNOWLEDGMENTS**
792   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
793 < \begin{acknowledgements}
793 > \begin{acknowledgments}
794    Support for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation
795    under grant CHE-1362211. Computational time was provided by the
796    Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame.
797 < \end{acknowledgements}
797 > \end{acknowledgments}
798  
799   \newpage
800   \bibliographystyle{aip}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines