ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/chrisDissertation/Ice.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/chrisDissertation/Ice.tex (file contents):
Revision 3022 by chrisfen, Fri Sep 22 13:45:24 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 3023 by chrisfen, Tue Sep 26 03:07:59 2006 UTC

# Line 107 | Line 107 | isobaric-isothermal ({\it NPT}) simulations performed
107   isobaric-isothermal ({\it NPT}) simulations performed at 1 atm and
108   200~K. Each model (and each crystal structure) was allowed to relax for
109   300~ps in the {\it NPT} ensemble before averaging the density to obtain
110 < the volumes for the {\it NVT} simulations.All molecules were treated
110 > the volumes for the {\it NVT} simulations. All molecules were treated
111   as rigid bodies, with orientational motion propagated using the
112   symplectic DLM integration method described in section
113   \ref{sec:IntroIntegrate}.
# Line 119 | Line 119 | materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,V
119   been used extensively in the calculation of free energies for
120   condensed phases of
121   materials.\cite{Frenkel84,Hermens88,Meijer90,Baez95a,Vlot99}.  This
122 < method uses a sequence of simulations over which the system of
122 > method uses a sequence of simulations during which the system of
123   interest is converted into a reference system for which the free
124   energy is known analytically ($A_0$).  The difference in potential
125   energy between the reference system and the system of interest
# Line 316 | Line 316 | the experimental values; however, the solid phases sho
316   \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
317   regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
318   the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
319 < experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
319 > experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice I are
320   higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
321   \label{fig:tp3PhaseDia}
322   \end{figure}
# Line 359 | Line 359 | Ice-{\it i} is calculated to be 262~K, indicating that
359   B and Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_\textrm{m}$ value around 200~K
360   would be predicted from this work.  However, the $T_\textrm{m}$ from
361   Ice-{\it i} is calculated to be 262~K, indicating that these
362 < simulation based structures ought to be included in studies probing
362 > simulation-based structures ought to be included in studies probing
363   phase transitions with this model.  Also of interest in these results
364   is that SSD/E does not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm but does
365   sublime at 355~K.  This is due to the significant stability of
# Line 458 | Line 458 | show similar behavior to the Ewald results in figure
458   The results of these calculations in table \ref{tab:dampedFreeEnergy}
459   show similar behavior to the Ewald results in figure
460   \ref{fig:incCutoff}, at least for SSD/RF and SPC/E which are present
461 < in both. The ice polymorph Helmholtz free energies for SSD/RF order in
462 < the same fashion; however Ice-$i$ and ice B are quite a bit closer in
463 < free energy (nearly isoenergetic). The free energy differences between
464 < ice polymorphs for TRED water parallel SSD/RF, with the exception that
465 < ice B is destabilized such that it is not very close to Ice-$i$. The
466 < SPC/E results really show the near isoenergetic behavior when using
467 < the electrostatics correction. Ice B has the lowest Helmholtz free
468 < energy; however, all the polymorph results overlap within error.
461 > in both. The Helmholtz free energies of the ice polymorphs for SSD/RF
462 > order in the same fashion; however Ice-$i$ and ice B are quite a bit
463 > closer in free energy (nearly isoenergetic). The free energy
464 > differences between ice polymorphs for TRED water parallel SSD/RF,
465 > with the exception that ice B is destabilized such that it is not very
466 > close to Ice-$i$. The SPC/E results really show the near isoenergetic
467 > behavior when using the electrostatic correction. Ice B has the lowest
468 > Helmholtz free energy; however, all the polymorph results overlap
469 > within error.
470  
471   The most interesting results from these calculations come from the
472   more expensive TIP4P-Ew and TIP5P-E results. Both of these models were
# Line 483 | Line 484 | higher in energy, though overlapping within error, and
484   water model, the experimentally observed polymorph (ice
485   I$_\textrm{h}$) is the preferred form with ice I$_\textrm{c}$ slightly
486   higher in energy, though overlapping within error, and the less
487 < realistic ice B and Ice-$i^\prime$ are destabilized relative to these
488 < polymorphs. TIP5P-E shows similar behavior to SPC/E, where there is no
489 < real free energy distinction between the various polymorphs because
490 < many overlap within error. While ice B is close in free energy to the
491 < other polymorphs, these results fail to support the findings of other
492 < researchers indicating the preferred form of TIP5P at 1~atm is a
493 < structure similar to ice B.\cite{Yamada02,Vega05,Abascal05} It should
494 < be noted that we are looking at TIP5P-E rather than TIP5P, and the
495 < differences in the Lennard-Jones parameters could be a reason for this
496 < dissimilarity.  Overall, these results indicate that TIP4P-Ew is a
497 < better mimic of real water than these other models when studying
498 < crystallization and solid forms of water.
487 > realistic ice B and Ice-$i^\prime$ structures are destabilized
488 > relative to these polymorphs. TIP5P-E shows similar behavior to SPC/E,
489 > where there is no real free energy distinction between the various
490 > polymorphs because many overlap within error. While ice B is close in
491 > free energy to the other polymorphs, these results fail to support the
492 > findings of other researchers indicating the preferred form of TIP5P
493 > at 1~atm is a structure similar to ice
494 > B.\cite{Yamada02,Vega05,Abascal05} It should be noted that we are
495 > looking at TIP5P-E rather than TIP5P, and the differences in the
496 > Lennard-Jones parameters could be a reason for this dissimilarity.
497 > Overall, these results indicate that TIP4P-Ew is a better mimic of
498 > real water than these other models when studying crystallization and
499 > solid forms of water.
500  
501   \section{Conclusions}
502  
# Line 520 | Line 522 | polarizable or flexible models. It is entirely possibl
522  
523   We also note that none of the water models used in this study are
524   polarizable or flexible models. It is entirely possible that the
525 < polarizability of real water makes Ice-$i$ substantially less stable
526 < than ice I$_\textrm{h}$. The dipole moment of the water molecules
527 < increases as the system becomes more condensed, and the increasing
528 < dipole moment should destabilize the tetramer structures in
525 > polarizability of real water makes the Ice-$i$ structure substantially
526 > less stable than ice I$_\textrm{h}$. The dipole moment of the water
527 > molecules increases as the system becomes more condensed, and the
528 > increasing dipole moment should destabilize the tetramer structures in
529   Ice-$i$. Right now, using TIP4P-Ew with an electrostatic correction
530   gives the proper thermodynamically preferred state, and we recommend
531   this arrangement for study of crystallization processes if the
# Line 545 | Line 547 | for the two Ice-{\it i} variants (along with example i
547   results, we have calculated the oxygen-oxygen pair correlation
548   function, $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$, and the structure factor, $S(\vec{q})$
549   for the two Ice-{\it i} variants (along with example ice
550 < I$_\textrm{h}$ and I$_\textrm{c}$ plots) at 77~K, and they are shown in
551 < figures \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} respectively.  It is
550 > I$_\textrm{h}$ and I$_\textrm{c}$ plots) at 77~K, and they are shown
551 > in figures \ref{fig:gofr} and \ref{fig:sofq} respectively.  It is
552   interesting to note that the structure factors for Ice-$i^\prime$ and
553   Ice-I$_c$ are quite similar.  The primary differences are small peaks
554   at 1.125, 2.29, and 2.53~\AA$^{-1}$, so particular attention to these
555 < regions would be needed to identify the new $i^\prime$ variant from
556 < the I$_\textrm{c}$ polymorph.
555 > regions would be needed to distinguish Ice-$i^\prime$ from ice
556 > I$_\textrm{c}$.
557  
558  
559   \begin{figure}
# Line 566 | Line 568 | I$_\textrm{c}$ at 77~K.  The raw structure factors hav
568   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/sofq.pdf}
569   \caption{Predicted structure factors for Ice-{\it i} and ice
570   I$_\textrm{c}$ at 77~K.  The raw structure factors have been
571 < convoluted with a gaussian instrument function (0.075~\AA$^{-1}$
571 > convoluted with a Gaussian instrument function (0.075~\AA$^{-1}$
572   width) to compensate for the truncation effects in our finite size
573 < simulations. The labeled peaks compared favorably with ``spurious''
572 < peaks observed in experimental studies of amorphous solid
573 < water.\cite{Bizid87}}
573 > simulations.}
574   \label{fig:sofq}
575   \end{figure}
576  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines