1 |
\section{Conclusions} |
2 |
\label{sec:conclusion} |
3 |
|
4 |
Our heat-transfer calculations have utilized the best current |
5 |
estimates of the interfacial heat transfer coefficient (G) from recent |
6 |
experiments. Using reasonable values for thermal conductivity in both |
7 |
the metallic particle and the surrounding solvent, we have obtained |
8 |
cooling rates for laser-heated nanoparticles that are in excess of |
9 |
10$^{13}$ K / s. To test whether or not this cooling rate can form |
10 |
glassy nanoparticles, we have performed a mixed molecular dynamics |
11 |
simulation in which the atoms in contact with the solvent or capping |
12 |
agent are evolved under Langevin dynamics while the remaining atoms |
13 |
are evolved under Newtonian dynamics. The effective solvent viscosity |
14 |
($\eta$) is a free parameter which we have tuned so that the particles |
15 |
in the simulation follow the same cooling curve as their experimental |
16 |
counterparts. From the local icosahedral ordering around the atoms in |
17 |
the nanoparticles (particularly Copper atoms), we deduce that it is |
18 |
likely that glassy nanobeads are created via laser heating of |
19 |
bimetallic nanoparticles, particularly when the initial temperature of |
20 |
the particles approaches the melting temperature of the bulk metal |
21 |
alloy. |
22 |
|
23 |
Improvements to our calculations would require: 1) explicit treatment |
24 |
of the capping agent and solvent, 2) another radial region to handle |
25 |
the heat transfer to the solvent vapor layer that is likely to form |
26 |
immediately surrounding the hot |
27 |
particle,\cite{Hu:2004lr,kotaidis:184702} and 3) larger particles in |
28 |
the size range most easily studied via laser heating experiments. |
29 |
|
30 |
The local icosahedral ordering we observed in these bimetallic |
31 |
particles is centered almost completely around the copper atoms, and |
32 |
this is likely due to the size mismatch leading to a more efficient |
33 |
packing of 5-membered rings of silver around a central copper atom. |
34 |
This size mismatch should be reflected in bulk calculations, and work |
35 |
is ongoing in our lab to confirm this observation in bulk |
36 |
glass-formers. |
37 |
|
38 |
The physical properties (bulk modulus, frequency of the breathing |
39 |
mode, and density) of glassy nanobeads should be somewhat different |
40 |
from their crystalline counterparts. However, observation of these |
41 |
differences may require single-particle resolution of the ultrafast |
42 |
vibrational spectrum of one particle both before and after the |
43 |
crystallite has been converted into a glassy bead. |
44 |
|