ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/chuckDissertation/nanoglass.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/chuckDissertation/nanoglass.tex (file contents):
Revision 3483 by chuckv, Tue Jan 13 14:39:50 2009 UTC vs.
Revision 3496 by chuckv, Wed Apr 8 19:13:41 2009 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 +
2 +
3   %!TEX root = /Users/charles/Documents/chuckDissertation/dissertation.tex
4   \chapter{\label{chap:nanoglass}GLASS FORMATION IN METALLIC NANOPARTICLES}
5  
6 < \section{INTRODUCTION}
6 > \section{Introduction}
7  
8 < Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has
7 < attracted enormous interest in the past several years. This is partly
8 < due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles
9 < in a wide range of sizes and geometries. Living tissue is nearly
10 < transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an
11 < unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both
12 < diagnostic and therapeutic settings.\cite{West:2003fk,Hu:2006lr} One
13 < of the side effects of absorption of laser radiation at these
14 < frequencies is the rapid (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic
15 < degrees of freedom in the metal. This hot electron gas quickly
16 < transfers heat to the phonon modes of the particle, resulting in a
17 < rapid heating of the lattice of the metal particles.  Since metallic
18 < nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume ratio, many of the
19 < metal atoms are at surface locations and experience relatively weak
20 < bonding. This is observable in a lowering of the melting temperatures
21 < of these particles when compared with bulk metallic
22 < samples.\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} One of the side effects of
23 < the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at the plasmon
24 < resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal
25 < droplets.\cite{Mafune01,HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Link:2000lr,Plech:2003yq,plech:195423,Plech:2007rt}
8 > Excitation of the plasmon resonance in metallic nanoparticles has attracted enormous interest in the past several years. This is partly due to the location of the plasmon band in the near IR for particles in a wide range of sizes and geometries. Living tissue is nearly transparent in the near IR, and for this reason, there is an unrealized potential for metallic nanoparticles to be used in both diagnostic and therapeutic settings.\cite{West:2003fk,Hu:2006lr} One of the side effects of absorption of laser radiation at these frequencies is the rapid (sub-picosecond) heating of the electronic degrees of freedom in the metal. This hot electron gas quickly transfers heat to the phonon modes of the particle, resulting in a rapid heating of the lattice of the metal particles. Since metallic nanoparticles have a large surface area to volume ratio, many of the metal atoms are at surface locations and experience relatively weak bonding. This is observable in a lowering of the melting temperatures of these particles when compared with bulk metallic samples.\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} One of the side effects of the excitation of small metallic nanoparticles at the plasmon resonance is the facile creation of liquid metal droplets.\cite{Mafune01,HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Link:2000lr,Plech:2003yq,plech:195423,Plech:2007rt}
9  
10 < Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in
28 < the Hartland, El-Sayed and Plech
29 < groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003lr,Petrova:2007qy,Link:2000lr,plech:195423,Plech:2007rt}
30 < These experiments mostly use the technique of time-resolved optical
31 < pump-probe spectroscopy, where a pump laser pulse serves to excite
32 < conduction band electrons in the nanoparticle and a following probe
33 < laser pulse allows observation of the time evolution of the
34 < electron-phonon coupling. Hu and Hartland have observed a direct
35 < relation between the size of the nanoparticle and the observed cooling
36 < rate using such pump-probe techniques.\cite{Hu:2004lr} Plech {\it et
37 < al.} have use pulsed x-ray scattering as a probe to directly access
38 < changes to atomic structure following pump
39 < excitation.\cite{plech:195423} They further determined that heat
40 < transfer in nanoparticles to the surrounding solvent is goverened by
41 < interfacial dynamics and not the thermal transport properties of the
42 < solvent.  This is in agreement with Cahill,\cite{Wilson:2002uq}
43 < but opposite to the conclusions in Reference \citen{Hu:2004lr}.
10 > Much of the experimental work on this subject has been carried out in the Hartland, El-Sayed and Plech groups.\cite{HartlandG.V._jp0276092,Hodak:2000rb,Hartland:2003lr,Petrova:2007qy,Link:2000lr,plech:195423,Plech:2007rt} These experiments mostly use the technique of time-resolved optical pump-probe spectroscopy, where a pump laser pulse serves to excite conduction band electrons in the nanoparticle and a following probe laser pulse allows observation of the time evolution of the electron-phonon coupling. Hu and Hartland have observed a direct relation between the size of the nanoparticle and the observed cooling rate using such pump-probe techniques.\cite{Hu:2004lr} Plech {\it et al.} have use pulsed x-ray scattering as a probe to directly access changes to atomic structure following pump excitation.\cite{plech:195423} They further determined that heat transfer in nanoparticles to the surrounding solvent is goverened by interfacial dynamics and not the thermal transport properties of the solvent. This is in agreement with Cahill,\cite{Wilson:2002uq} but opposite to the conclusions in Reference \cite{Hu:2004lr}.
11  
12 < Since these experiments are carried out in condensed phase
46 < surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat
47 < transfer to the surrounding solvent a relatively rapid process. In our
48 < recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold
49 < nanoparticles,\cite{VardemanC.F._jp051575r} we observed that the
50 < cooling rate for these particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in
51 < excess of the cooling rate required for glass formation in bulk
52 < metallic alloys.\cite{Greer:1995qy} Given this fact, it may be
53 < possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and quench metallic
54 < nanoparticles in order to form glassy nanobeads.
12 > Since these experiments are carried out in condensed phase surroundings, the large surface area to volume ratio makes the heat transfer to the surrounding solvent a relatively rapid process. In a recent simulation study of the laser excitation of gold nanoparticles,\cite{VardemanC.F._jp051575r} it is observed that the cooling rate for these particles (10$^{11}$-10$^{12}$ K/s) is in excess of the cooling rate required for glass formation in bulk metallic alloys.\cite{Greer:1995qy} Given this fact, it may be possible to use laser excitation to melt, alloy and quench metallic nanoparticles in order to form glassy nanobeads.
13  
14 < To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, we have
57 < chosen the bimetallic alloy of Silver (60\%) and Copper (40\%) as a
58 < model system because it is an experimentally known glass former, and
59 < has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy
60 < dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that
61 < alloys composed of Copper and Silver should be miscible in the solid
62 < state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each
63 < another.\cite{Kittel:1996fk} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are
64 < a well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the
65 < liquid state given equilibrium conditions.\cite{Massalski:1986rt}
66 < Below the eutectic temperature of 779 $^\circ$C and composition
67 < (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase
68 < separate into Ag and Cu rich $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases,
69 < respectively.\cite{Banhart:1992sv,Ma:2005fk} This behavior is due to a
70 < positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the
71 < one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ is on
72 < the order of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005fk} Non-equilibrium solid
73 < solutions may be formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a
74 < compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be
75 < formed.\cite{najafabadi:3144}
14 > To study whether or not glass nanobead formation is feasible, the bimetallic alloy of silver (60\%) and copper (40\%) has been chosen as a model system because it is an experimentally known glass former, and has been used previously as a theoretical model for glassy dynamics.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} The Hume-Rothery rules suggest that alloys composed of copper and silver should be miscible in the solid state, because their lattice constants are within 15\% of each another.\cite{Kittel:1996fk} Experimentally, however Ag-Cu alloys are a well-known exception to this rule and are only miscible in the liquid state given equilibrium conditions.\cite{Massalski:1986rt} Below the eutectic temperature of 779 $^\circ$C and composition (60.1\% Ag, 39.9\% Cu), the solid alloys of Ag and Cu will phase separate into Ag and Cu rich $\alpha$ and $\beta$ phases, respectively.\cite{Banhart:1992sv,Ma:2005fk} This behavior is due to a positive heat of mixing in both the solid and liquid phases. For the one-to-one composition fcc solid solution, $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ is on the order of +6~kJ/mole.\cite{Ma:2005fk} Non-equilibrium solid solutions may be formed by undercooling, and under these conditions, a compositionally-disordered $\gamma$ fcc phase can be formed.\cite{najafabadi:3144}
15  
16 < Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in
78 < 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in
79 < which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled
80 < metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive
81 < $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are
82 < typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta
83 < H_{\rm mix}$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid
84 < states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than
85 < Ag-Cu. If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the
86 < minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique
87 < crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely
88 < studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat
89 < quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical
90 < alloying. Both structural \cite{sheng:184203} and
91 < dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} computational studies have also been
92 < performed on this system.
16 > Metastable alloys composed of Ag-Cu were first reported by Duwez in 1960 and were created by using a ``splat quenching'' technique in which a liquid droplet is propelled by a shock wave against a cooled metallic target.\cite{duwez:1136} Because of the small positive $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$, supersaturated crystalline solutions are typically obtained rather than an amorphous phase. Higher $\Delta H_{\rm mix}$ systems, such as Ag-Ni, are immiscible even in liquid states, but they tend to form metastable alloys much more readily than Ag-Cu.\cite{Ma:2005fk} If present, the amorphous Ag-Cu phase is usually seen as the minority phase in most experiments. Because of this unique crystalline-amorphous behavior, the Ag-Cu system has been widely studied. Methods for creating such bulk phase structures include splat quenching, vapor deposition, ion beam mixing and mechanical alloying. Both structural \cite{sheng:184203} and dynamic\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn} computational studies have also been performed on this system.
17  
18 < Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has
95 < been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials. The literature on
96 < alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which
97 < has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid
98 < phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been
99 < successfully constructed using techniques such as laser
100 < ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of
101 < metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has
102 < been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from
103 < core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003lr} To date, attempts at
104 < creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed
105 < nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These
106 < attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy
107 < nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell
108 < structures.
18 > Although bulk Ag-Cu alloys have been studied widely, this alloy has been mostly overlooked in nanoscale materials. The literature on alloyed metallic nanoparticles has dealt with the Ag-Au system, which has the useful property of being miscible on both solid and liquid phases. Nanoparticles of another miscible system, Au-Cu, have been successfully constructed using techniques such as laser ablation,\cite{Malyavantham:2004cu} and the synthetic reduction of metal ions in solution.\cite{Kim:2003lv} Laser induced alloying has been used as a technique for creating Au-Ag alloy particles from core-shell particles.\cite{Hartland:2003lr} To date, attempts at creating Ag-Cu nanoparticles have used ion implantation to embed nanoparticles in a glass matrix.\cite{De:1996ta,Magruder:1994rg} These attempts have been largely unsuccessful in producing mixed alloy nanoparticles, and instead produce phase segregated or core-shell structures.
19  
20 < One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu
111 < nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in
112 < an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon
113 < resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two
114 < distinct resonance peaks where mixed particles show a single shifted
115 < and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver
116 < occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.\cite{HengleinA._jp992950g}
117 < On Al$_2$O$_3$ films, these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for
118 < the pure metals. For bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an
119 < absorption peak is seen between 400-550 nm. With increasing Ag
120 < content, the SPR shifts towards the blue, with the peaks nearly
121 < coincident at a composition of 57\% Ag. Gonzalo {\it et al.} cited the
122 < existence of a single broad resonance peak as evidence of an alloyed
123 < particle rather than a phase segregated system.  However, spectroscopy
124 < may not be able to tell the difference between alloyed particles and
125 < mixtures of segregated particles.  High-resolution electron microscopy
126 < has so far been unable to determine whether the mixed nanoparticles
127 < were an amorphous phase or a supersaturated crystalline phase.
20 > One of the more successful attempts at creating intermixed Ag-Cu nanoparticles used alternate pulsed laser ablation and deposition in an amorphous Al$_2$O$_3$ matrix.\cite{gonzalo:5163} Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) of bimetallic core-shell structures typically show two distinct resonance peaks where as mixed particles show a single shifted and broadened resonance.\cite{Hodak:2000rb} The SPR for pure silver occurs at 400 nm and for copper at 570 nm.\cite{HengleinA._jp992950g} On Al$_2$O$_3$ films, these resonances move to 424 nm and 572 nm for the pure metals. For bimetallic nanoparticles with 40\% Ag an absorption peak is seen between 400-550 nm. With increasing Ag content, the SPR shifts towards the blue, with the peaks nearly coincident to the pure silver surface plasmon at a composition of 57\% Ag. Gonzalo {\it et al.} cited the existence of a single broad resonance peak as evidence of an alloyed particle rather than a phase segregated system. However, spectroscopy may not be able to tell the difference between alloyed particles and mixtures of segregated particles. High-resolution electron microscopy has so far been unable to determine whether the mixed nanoparticles were an amorphous phase or a supersaturated crystalline phase.
21  
22 < Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations
130 < is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared
131 < displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared
132 < displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials
133 < deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times,
134 < entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the
135 < infinite time limit.\cite{Kob:1999fk} However, diffusion in
136 < nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are
137 < confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region
138 < larger than the particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries,
139 < $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of
140 < $3R^2/40$.\cite{ShibataT._ja026764r} This limits the utility of
141 < dynamical measures of glass formation when studying nanoparticles.
22 > Characterization of glassy behavior by molecular dynamics simulations is typically done using dynamic measurements such as the mean squared displacement, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$. Liquids exhibit a mean squared displacement that is linear in time (at long times). Glassy materials deviate significantly from this linear behavior at intermediate times, entering a sub-linear regime with a return to linear behavior in the infinite time limit.\cite{Kob:1999fk} However, diffusion in nanoparticles differs significantly from the bulk in that atoms are confined to a roughly spherical volume and cannot explore any region larger than the particle radius ($R$). In these confined geometries, $\langle r^2(t) \rangle$ approaches a limiting value of $3R^2/40$.\cite{ShibataT._ja026764r} This limits the utility of dynamical measures of glass formation when studying nanoparticles.
23  
24 < However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among
144 < nearest-neghbors (in contrast with crystalline and liquid-like
145 < configurations). Local icosahedral structures are the
146 < three-dimensional equivalent of covering a two-dimensional plane with
147 < 5-sided tiles; they cannot be used to tile space in a periodic
148 < fashion, and are therefore an indicator of non-periodic packing in
149 < amorphous solids. Steinhart {\it et al.} defined an orientational bond
150 < order parameter that is sensitive to icosahedral
151 < ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond order parameter can
152 < therefore be used to characterize glass formation in liquid and solid
153 < solutions.\cite{wolde:9932}
24 > However, glassy materials exhibit strong icosahedral ordering among nearest-neghbors (in contrast with crystalline and liquid-like configurations). Local icosahedral structures are the three-dimensional equivalent of covering a two-dimensional plane with 5-sided tiles; they cannot be used to tile space in a periodic fashion, and are therefore an indicator of non-periodic packing in amorphous solids. Steinhart {\it et al.} defined an orientational bond order parameter that is sensitive to icosahedral ordering.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This bond order parameter can therefore be used to characterize glass formation in liquid and solid solutions.\cite{wolde:9932}
25  
26 < Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the
156 < formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either
157 < gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or
158 < nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim
159 < 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found
160 < icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this
161 < rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of an amorphous
162 < structure.\cite{Strandburg:1992qy} The nearest neighbor information
163 < was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis
164 < and bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted
165 < that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates
166 < that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes
167 < less than 20\AA. Single component systems are known to form amorphous
168 < states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form
169 < amorphous structures in bulk materials.
26 > Theoretical molecular dynamics studies have been performed on the formation of amorphous single component nanoclusters of either gold,\cite{Chen:2004ec,Cleveland:1997jb,Cleveland:1997gu} or nickel,\cite{Gafner:2004bg,Qi:2001nn} by rapid cooling($\thicksim 10^{12}-10^{13}$ K/s) from a liquid state. All of these studies found icosahedral ordering in the resulting structures produced by this rapid cooling which can be evidence of the formation of an amorphous structure.\cite{Strandburg:1992qy} The nearest neighbor information was obtained from pair correlation functions, common neighbor analysis and bond order parameters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} It should be noted that these studies used single component systems with cooling rates that are only obtainable in computer simulations and particle sizes less than 20\AA. Single component systems are known to form amorphous states in small clusters,\cite{Breaux:rz} but do not generally form amorphous structures in bulk materials.
27  
28 < Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many
172 < interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of
173 < such a system. Does the large surface area to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu
174 < nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state?
175 < Nanoparticles have been shown to have a size dependent melting
176 < transition ($T_m$),\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} so we might expect
177 < a similar trend to follow for the glass transition temperature
178 < ($T_g$). By analogy, bulk metallic glasses exhibit a correlation
179 < between $T_m$ and $T_g$ although such dependence is difficult to
180 < establish because of the dependence of $T_g$ on cooling rate and the
181 < process by which the glass is formed.\cite{Wang:2003fk} It has also
182 < been demonstrated that there is a finite size effect depressing $T_g$
183 < in polymer glasses in confined geometries.\cite{Alcoutlabi:2005kx}
28 > Since the nanoscale Ag-Cu alloy has been largely unexplored, many interesting questions remain about the formation and properties of such a system. Does the large surface area to volume ratio aid Ag-Cu nanoparticles in rapid cooling and formation of an amorphous state? Nanoparticles have been shown to have a size dependent melting transition ($T_m$),\cite{Buffat:1976yq,Dick:2002qy} so it might be expected that a similar trend would follow for the glass transition temperature ($T_g$). By analogy, bulk metallic glasses exhibit a correlation between $T_m$ and $T_g$ although such dependence is difficult to establish because of the dependence of $T_g$ on cooling rate and the process by which the glass is formed.\cite{Wang:2003fk} It has also been demonstrated that there is a finite size effect depressing $T_g$ in polymer glasses in confined geometries.\cite{Alcoutlabi:2005kx}
29  
30 < In the sections below, we describe our modeling of the laser
186 < excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles {\it in silico} to
187 < mimic real experimental conditions. The simulation parameters have
188 < been tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions,
189 < and we discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well
190 < as the clustering of icosahedral centers that we observed.
30 > In the sections below, the modeling of the laser excitation and subsequent cooling of the particles {\it in silico} to mimic real experimental conditions will be described. The simulation parameters have been tuned to the degree possible to match experimental conditions, and we discusss both the icosahedral ordering in the system, as well as the clustering of icosahedral centers that is observed.
31  
32 < \section{COMPUTATIONAL METHODOLOGY}
193 < \label{nanoglass:sec:details}
32 > \section{Computer Methodology} \label{nanoglass:sec:details}
33  
34 < \subsection{INITIAL GEOMETRIES AND HEATING}
34 > \subsection{Initial Geometries and Heating}
35  
36 + Cu-core / Ag-shell and random alloy structures were constructed on an underlying FCC lattice (4.09 {\AA}) at the bulk eutectic composition $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$. Both initial geometries were considered although experimental results suggest that the random structure is the most likely structure to be found following synthesis.\cite{Jiang:2005lr,gonzalo:5163} Three different sizes of nanoparticles corresponding to a 20 {\AA} radius (2382 atoms), 30 {\AA} radius (6603 atoms) and 40 {\AA} radius (15683 atoms) were constructed. These initial structures were relaxed to their equilibrium structures at 20 K for 20 ps and again at 300 K for 100 ps sampling from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at each temperature. All simulations were conducted using the {\sc oopse} molecular dynamics package.\cite{Meineke:2004uq}
37  
38 < Cu-core / Ag-shell and random alloy structures were constructed on an
199 < underlying FCC lattice (4.09 {\AA}) at the bulk eutectic composition
200 < $\mathrm{Ag}_6\mathrm{Cu}_4$.  Both initial geometries were considered
201 < although experimental results suggest that the random structure is the
202 < most likely structure to be found following
203 < synthesis.\cite{Jiang:2005lr,gonzalo:5163} Three different sizes of
204 < nanoparticles corresponding to a 20 \AA radius (2382 atoms), 30 {\AA}
205 < radius (6603 atoms) and 40 {\AA} radius (15683 atoms) were
206 < constructed.  These initial structures were relaxed to their
207 < equilibrium structures at 20 K for 20 ps and again at 300 K for 100 ps
208 < sampling from a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at each
209 < temperature. All simulations were conducted using the {\sc oopse}
210 < molecular dynamics package.\cite{Meineke:2004uq}
38 > To mimic the effects of the heating due to laser irradiation, the particles were allowed to melt by sampling velocities from the Maxwell Boltzmann distribution at a temperature of 900 K. The particles were run under microcanonical simulation conditions for 1 ns of simulation time prior to studying the effects of heat transfer to the solvent. In all cases, center of mass translational and rotational motion of the particles were set to zero before any data collection was undertaken. Structural features (pair distribution functions) were used to verify that the particles were indeed liquid droplets before cooling simulations took place.
39  
40 < To mimic the effects of the heating due to laser irradiation, the
213 < particles were allowed to melt by sampling velocities from the Maxwell
214 < Boltzmann distribution at a temperature of 900 K.  The particles were
215 < run under microcanonical simulation conditions for 1 ns of simualtion
216 < time prior to studying the effects of heat transfer to the solvent.
217 < In all cases, center of mass translational and rotational motion of
218 < the particles were set to zero before any data collection was
219 < undertaken.  Structural features (pair distribution functions) were
220 < used to verify that the particles were indeed liquid droplets before
221 < cooling simulations took place.
40 > \subsection{Modeling Random Alloy and Core Shell Particles in Solution Phase Environments}
41  
42 < \subsection{MODELING RANDOM ALLOY AND CORE SHELL PARTICLES IN SOLUTION PHASE ENVIRONMENTS}
224 <
225 <
226 <
227 < To approximate the effects of rapid heat transfer to the solvent
228 < following a heating at the plasmon resonance, we utilized a
229 < methodology in which atoms contained in the outer $4$ {\AA} radius of
230 < the nanoparticle evolved under Langevin Dynamics,
42 > To approximate the effects of rapid heat transfer to the solvent following a heating at the plasmon resonance, a methodology was utilized in which atoms contained in the outer $4$ {\AA} radius of the nanoparticle evolved under Langevin Dynamics
43   \begin{equation}
44 < m \frac{\partial^2 \vec{x}}{\partial t^2} = F_\textrm{sys}(\vec{x}(t))
45 < - 6 \pi a \eta \vec{v}(t)  + F_\textrm{ran}
46 < \label{eq:langevin}
44 >        m \frac{
45 >        \partial^2 \vec{x}}{
46 >        \partial t^2} = F_\textrm{sys}(\vec{x}(t)) - 6 \pi a \eta \vec{v}(t) + F_\textrm{ran} \label{eq:langevin}
47   \end{equation}
48 < with a solvent friction ($\eta$) approximating the contribution from
237 < the solvent and capping agent.  Atoms located in the interior of the
238 < nanoparticle evolved under Newtonian dynamics.  The set-up of our
239 < simulations is nearly identical with the ``stochastic boundary
240 < molecular dynamics'' ({\sc sbmd}) method that has seen wide use in the
241 < protein simulation
242 < community.\cite{BROOKS:1985kx,BROOKS:1983uq,BRUNGER:1984fj} A sketch
243 < of this setup can be found in Fig. \ref{fig:langevinSketch}.  In
244 < Eq. (\ref{eq:langevin}) the frictional forces of a spherical atom
245 < of radius $a$ depend on the solvent viscosity.  The random forces are
246 < usually taken as gaussian random variables with zero mean and a
247 < variance tied to the solvent viscosity and temperature,
48 > with a solvent friction ($\eta$) approximating the contribution from the solvent and generic capping agent. Langevin Dynamics is described in Section \ref{introSec:LD} of this dissertation. Atoms located in the interior of the nanoparticle evolved under Newtonian dynamics. The set-up of our simulations is nearly identical with the ``stochastic boundary molecular dynamics'' ({\sc sbmd}) method that has seen wide use in the protein simulation community.\cite{BROOKS:1985kx,BROOKS:1983uq,BRUNGER:1984fj} A sketch of this setup can be found in Fig. \ref{fig:langevinSketch}. In Eq. (\ref{eq:langevin}) the frictional forces of a spherical atom of radius $a$ depend on the solvent viscosity. The random forces are usually taken as gaussian random variables with zero mean and a variance tied to the solvent viscosity and temperature,
49   \begin{equation}
50 < \langle F_\textrm{ran}(t) \cdot F_\textrm{ran} (t')
250 < \rangle = 2 k_B T (6 \pi \eta a) \delta(t - t')
251 < \label{eq:stochastic}
50 >        \langle F_\textrm{ran}(t) \cdot F_\textrm{ran} (t') \rangle = 2 k_B T (6 \pi \eta a) \delta(t - t') \label{eq:stochastic}
51   \end{equation}
52 < Due to the presence of the capping agent and the lack of details about
53 < the atomic-scale interactions between the metallic atoms and the
54 < solvent, the effective viscosity is a essentially a free parameter
55 < that must be tuned to give experimentally relevant simulations.
257 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
258 < \centering
259 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/stochbound.pdf}
260 < \caption{Methodology used to mimic the experimental cooling conditions
261 < of a hot nanoparticle surrounded by a solvent.  Atoms in the core of
262 < the particle evolved under Newtonian dynamics, while atoms that were
263 < in the outer skin of the particle evolved under Langevin dynamics.
264 < The radius of the spherical region operating under Newtonian dynamics,
265 < $r_\textrm{Newton}$ was set to be 4 {\AA} smaller than the original
266 < radius ($R$) of the liquid droplet.}
267 < \label{fig:langevinSketch}
52 > Due to the presence of the capping agent and the lack of details about the atomic-scale interactions between the metallic atoms and the solvent, the effective viscosity is a essentially a free parameter that must be tuned to give experimentally relevant simulations.
53 > \begin{figure}
54 >        [htbp] \centering
55 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/stochbound.pdf} \caption{Methodology used to mimic the experimental cooling conditions of a hot nanoparticle surrounded by a solvent. Atoms in the core of the particle evolved under Newtonian dynamics, while atoms that were in the outer skin of the particle evolved under Langevin dynamics. The radius of the spherical region operating under Newtonian dynamics, $r_\textrm{Newton}$ was set to be 4 {\AA} smaller than the original radius ($R$) of the liquid droplet.} \label{fig:langevinSketch}
56   \end{figure}
57  
58 < The viscosity ($\eta$) can be tuned by comparing the cooling rate that
59 < a set of nanoparticles experience with the known cooling rates for
60 < similar particles obtained via the laser heating experiments.
273 < Essentially, we tune the solvent viscosity until the thermal decay
274 < profile matches a heat-transfer model using reasonable values for the
275 < interfacial conductance and the thermal conductivity of the solvent.
276 <
277 < Cooling rates for the experimentally-observed nanoparticles were
278 < calculated from the heat transfer equations for a spherical particle
279 < embedded in a ambient medium that allows for diffusive heat transport.
280 < Following Plech {\it et al.},\cite{plech:195423} we use a heat
281 < transfer model that consists of two coupled differential equations
282 < in the Laplace domain,
58 > The viscosity ($\eta$) can be tuned by comparing the cooling rate that a set of nanoparticles experience with the known cooling rates for similar particles obtained via the laser heating experiments. Essentially, the solvent viscosity is tuned until the thermal decay profile matches a heat-transfer model using reasonable values for the interfacial conductance and the thermal conductivity of the solvent.
59 >
60 > Cooling rates for the experimentally-observed nanoparticles were calculated from the heat transfer equations for a spherical particle embedded in a ambient medium that allows for diffusive heat transport. Following Plech {\it et al.},\cite{plech:195423} a heat transfer model is used that consists of two coupled differential equations in the Laplace domain,
61   \begin{eqnarray}
62 < Mc_{P}\cdot(s\cdot T_{p}(s)-T_{0})+4\pi R^{2} G\cdot(T_{p}(s)-T_{f}(r=R,s)=0\\
63 < \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial r} T_{f}(r,s)\right)_{r=R} +
64 < \frac{G}{K}(T_{p}(s)-T_{f}(r,s) = 0
65 < \label{eq:heateqn}
62 >        Mc_{P}\cdot(s\cdot T_{p}(s)-T_{0})+4\pi R^{2} G\cdot(T_{p}(s)-T_{f}(r=R,s)=0\\
63 >        \left(\frac{
64 >        \partial}{
65 >        \partial r} T_{f}(r,s)\right)_{r=R} + \frac{G}{K}(T_{p}(s)-T_{f}(r,s) = 0 \label{eq:heateqn}
66   \end{eqnarray}
67 < where $s$ is the time-conjugate variable in Laplace space. The
290 < variables in these equations describe a nanoparticle of radius $R$,
291 < mass $M$, and specific heat $c_{p}$ at an initial temperature
292 < $T_0$. The surrounding solvent has a thermal profile $T_f(r,t)$,
293 < thermal conductivity $K$, density $\rho$, and specific heat $c$. $G$
294 < is the interfacial conductance between the nanoparticle and the
295 < surrounding solvent, and contains information about heat transfer to
296 < the capping agent as well as the direct metal-to-solvent heat loss.
297 < The temperature of the nanoparticle as a function of time can then
298 < obtained by the inverse Laplace transform,
67 > where $s$ is the time-conjugate variable in Laplace space. The variables in these equations describe a nanoparticle of radius $R$, mass $M$, and specific heat $c_{p}$ at an initial temperature $T_0$. The surrounding solvent has a thermal profile $T_f(r,t)$, thermal conductivity $K$, density $\rho$, and specific heat $c$. $G$ is the interfacial conductance between the nanoparticle and the surrounding solvent, and contains information about heat transfer to the capping agent as well as the direct metal-to-solvent heat loss. The temperature of the nanoparticle as a function of time can then obtained by the inverse Laplace transform,
68   \begin{equation}
69 < T_{p}(t)=\frac{2 k R^2 g^2
301 < T_0}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(-\kappa u^2
302 < t/R^2)u^2}{(u^2(1 + R g) - k R g)^2+(u^3 - k R g u)^2}\mathrm{d}u.
303 < \label{eq:laplacetransform}
69 >        T_{p}(t)=\frac{2 k R^2 g^2 T_0}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(-\kappa u^2 t/R^2)u^2}{(u^2(1 + R g) - k R g)^2+(u^3 - k R g u)^2}\mathrm{d}u. \label{eq:laplacetransform}
70   \end{equation}
71 < For simplicity, we have introduced the thermal diffusivity $\kappa =
306 < K/(\rho c)$,  and defined $k=4\pi R^3 \rho c /(M c_p)$ and $g = G/K$ in
307 < Eq. (\ref{eq:laplacetransform}).
71 > For simplicity, the thermal diffusivity $\kappa = K/(\rho c)$ has been introduced, and  $k=4\pi R^3 \rho c /(M c_p)$ and $g = G/K$ has been defined in Eq. (\ref{eq:heateqn}).
72  
73 < Eq. (\ref{eq:laplacetransform}) was solved numerically for the Ag-Cu
310 < system using mole-fraction weighted values for $c_p$ and $\rho_p$ of
311 < 0.295 $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$ and $9.826\times 10^6$ $(\mathrm{g
312 < m^{-3}})$ respectively. Since most of the laser excitation experiments
313 < have been done in aqueous solutions, parameters used for the fluid are
314 < $K$ of $0.6$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-1}K^{-1}})$, $\rho$ of $1.0\times10^6$
315 < $(\mathrm{g m^{-3}})$ and $c$ of $4.184$ $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$.
73 > Eq. (\ref{eq:laplacetransform}) was solved numerically for the Ag-Cu system using mole-fraction weighted values for $c_p$ and $\rho_p$ of 0.295 $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$ and $9.826\times 10^6$ $(\mathrm{g m^{-3}})$ respectively. Since most of the laser excitation experiments have been done in aqueous solutions, parameters used for the fluid are $K$ of $0.6$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-1}K^{-1}})$, $\rho$ of $1.0\times10^6$ $(\mathrm{g m^{-3}})$ and $c$ of $4.184$ $(\mathrm{J g^{-1} K^{-1}})$.
74  
75 < Values for the interfacial conductance have been determined by a
318 < number of groups for similar nanoparticles and range from a low
319 < $87.5\times 10^{6} (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ to $130\times 10^{6}
320 < (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.\cite{Wilson:2002uq} Wilson {\it
321 < et al.}  worked with Au, Pt, and AuPd nanoparticles and obtained an
322 < estimate for the interfacial conductance of $G=130
323 < (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.\cite{Wilson:2002uq} Similarly, Plech {\it
324 < et al.}  reported a value for the interfacial conductance of $G=105\pm
325 < 15 (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ for Au nanoparticles.\cite{plech:195423}
75 > Values for the interfacial conductance have been determined by a number of groups for similar nanoparticles and range from a low $87.5\times 10^{6} (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ to $130\times 10^{6} (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.\cite{Wilson:2002uq} Wilson {\it et al.} worked with Au, Pt, and AuPd nanoparticles and obtained an estimate for the interfacial conductance of $G=130 (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.\cite{Wilson:2002uq} Similarly, Plech {\it et al.} reported a value for the interfacial conductance of $G=105\pm 15 (\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ for Au nanoparticles.\cite{plech:195423}
76  
77 < We conducted our simulations at both ends of the range of
328 < experimentally-determined values for the interfacial conductance.
329 < This allows us to observe both the slowest and fastest heat transfers
330 < from the nanoparticle to the solvent that are consistent with
331 < experimental observations.  For the slowest heat transfer, a value for
332 < G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ was used and for
333 < the fastest heat transfer, a value of $117\times 10^{6}$
334 < $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ was used.  Based on calculations we have
335 < done using raw data from the Hartland group's thermal half-time
336 < experiments on Au nanospheres,\cite{HuM._jp020581+} the true G values
337 < are probably in the faster regime: $117\times 10^{6}$
338 < $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.
77 > Simulations were conducted at both ends of the range of experimentally-determined values for the interfacial conductance. This allows us to observe both the slowest and fastest heat transfers from the nanoparticle to the solvent that are consistent with experimental observations. For the slowest heat transfer, a value for G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ was used and for the fastest heat transfer, a value of $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ was used. Based on calculations performed using raw data from the Hartland group's thermal half-time experiments on Au nanospheres,\cite{HuM._jp020581+} the true G values are probably in the faster regime: $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.
78  
79 < The rate of cooling for the nanoparticles in a molecular dynamics
341 < simulation can then be tuned by changing the effective solvent
342 < viscosity ($\eta$) until the nanoparticle cooling rate matches the
343 < cooling rate described by the heat-transfer Eq.
344 < (\ref{eq:heateqn}). The effective solvent viscosity (in Pa s) for a G
345 < of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ is $4.2 \times
346 < 10^{-6}$, $5.0 \times 10^{-6}$, and
347 < $5.5 \times 10^{-6}$ for 20 {\AA}, 30 {\AA}, and 40 {\AA} particles, respectively. The
348 < effective solvent viscosity (again in Pa s) for an interfacial
349 < conductance of $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ is $5.7
350 < \times 10^{-6}$, $7.2 \times 10^{-6}$, and $7.5 \times 10^{-6}$
351 < for 20 {\AA}, 30 {\AA} and 40 {\AA} particles.  These viscosities are
352 < essentially gas-phase values, a fact which is consistent with the
353 < initial temperatures of the particles being well into the
354 < super-critical region for the aqueous environment.  Gas bubble
355 < generation has also been seen experimentally around gold nanoparticles
356 < in water.\cite{kotaidis:184702} Instead of a single value for the
357 < effective viscosity, a time-dependent parameter might be a better
358 < mimic of the cooling vapor layer that surrounds the hot particles.
359 < This may also be a contributing factor to the size-dependence of the
360 < effective viscosities in our simulations.
79 > The rate of cooling for the nanoparticles in a molecular dynamics simulation can then be tuned by changing the effective solvent viscosity ($\eta$) until the nanoparticle cooling rate matches the cooling rate described by the heat-transfer Eq. (\ref{eq:heateqn}). The effective solvent viscosity (in Pa s) for a G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ is $4.2 \times 10^{-6}$, $5.0 \times 10^{-6}$, and $5.5 \times 10^{-6}$ for 20 {\AA}, 30 {\AA}, and 40 {\AA} particles, respectively. The effective solvent viscosity (again in Pa s) for an interfacial conductance of $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ is $5.7 \times 10^{-6}$, $7.2 \times 10^{-6}$, and $7.5 \times 10^{-6}$ for 20 {\AA}, 30 {\AA} and 40 {\AA} particles. These viscosities are essentially gas-phase values, a fact which is consistent with the initial temperatures of the particles being well into the super-critical region for the aqueous environment. Gas bubble generation has also been seen experimentally around gold nanoparticles in water.\cite{kotaidis:184702} Instead of a single value for the effective viscosity, a time-dependent parameter might be a better mimic of the cooling vapor layer that surrounds the hot particles. This may also be a contributing factor to the size-dependence of the effective viscosities in our simulations.
80  
81 < Cooling traces for each particle size are presented in
82 < Fig. \ref{fig:images_cooling_plot}. It should be noted that the
83 < Langevin thermostat produces cooling curves that are consistent with
84 < Newtonian (single-exponential) cooling, which cannot match the cooling
366 < profiles from Eq. (\ref{eq:laplacetransform}) exactly. Fitting the
367 < Langevin cooling profiles to a single-exponential produces
368 < $\tau=25.576$ ps, $\tau=43.786$ ps, and $\tau=56.621$ ps for the 20,
369 < 30 and 40 {\AA} nanoparticles and a G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$
370 < $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.  For comparison's sake, similar
371 < single-exponential fits with an interfacial conductance of G of
372 < $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ produced a $\tau=13.391$
373 < ps, $\tau=30.426$ ps, $\tau=43.857$ ps for the 20, 30 and 40 {\AA}
374 < nanoparticles.
375 <
376 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
377 < \centering
378 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/cooling_plot.pdf}
379 < \caption{Thermal cooling curves obtained from the inverse Laplace
380 < transform heat model in Eq. (\ref{eq:laplacetransform}) (solid line) as
381 < well as from molecular dynamics simulations (circles).  Effective
382 < solvent viscosities of 4.2-7.5 $\times 10^{-6}$ Pa s (depending on the
383 < radius of the particle) give the best fit to the experimental cooling
384 < curves.  This viscosity suggests that the nanoparticles in these
385 < experiments are surrounded by a vapor layer (which is a reasonable
386 < assumptions given the initial temperatures of the particles).  }
387 < \label{fig:images_cooling_plot}
81 > Cooling traces for each particle size are presented in Fig. \ref{fig:images_cooling_plot}. It should be noted that the Langevin thermostat produces cooling curves that are consistent with Newtonian (single-exponential) cooling, which cannot match the cooling profiles from Eq. (\ref{eq:laplacetransform}) exactly. Fitting the Langevin cooling profiles to a single-exponential produces $\tau=25.576$ ps, $\tau=43.786$ ps, and $\tau=56.621$ ps for the 20, 30 and 40 {\AA} nanoparticles and a G of $87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$. For comparison's sake, similar single-exponential fits with an interfacial conductance of G of $117\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$ produced a $\tau=13.391$ ps, $\tau=30.426$ ps, $\tau=43.857$ ps for the 20, 30 and 40 {\AA} nanoparticles.
82 > \begin{figure}
83 >        [htbp] \centering
84 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/cooling_plot.pdf} \caption{Thermal cooling curves obtained from the inverse Laplace transform heat model in Eq. (\ref{eq:laplacetransform}) (solid line) as well as from molecular dynamics simulations (circles). Effective solvent viscosities of 4.2-7.5 $\times 10^{-6}$ Pa s (depending on the radius of the particle) give the best fit to the experimental cooling curves. This viscosity suggests that the nanoparticles in these experiments are surrounded by a vapor layer (which is a reasonable assumption given the initial temperatures of the particles). } \label{fig:images_cooling_plot}
85   \end{figure}
86  
87 < \subsection{POTENIALS FOR CLASSICAL SIMULATIONS OF BIMETALLIC NANOPARTICLES}
87 > \subsection{Potential For Simulations of Bimetallic Nanoparticles}
88  
89 < Several different potential models have been developed that reasonably
393 < describe interactions in transition metals. In particular, the
394 < Embedded Atom Model ({\sc eam})~\cite{PhysRevB.33.7983} and
395 < Sutton-Chen ({\sc sc})~\cite{Chen90} potential have been used to study
396 < a wide range of phenomena in both bulk materials and
397 < nanoparticles.\cite{Vardeman-II:2001jn,ShibataT._ja026764r,Sankaranarayanan:2005lr,Chui:2003fk,Wang:2005qy,Medasani:2007uq} Both
398 < potentials are based on a model of a metal which treats the nuclei and
399 < core electrons as pseudo-atoms embedded in the electron density due to
400 < the valence electrons on all of the other atoms in the system. The
401 < {\sc sc} potential has a simple form that closely resembles that of
402 < the ubiquitous Lennard Jones potential,
403 < \begin{equation}
404 < \label{eq:SCP1}
405 < U_{tot}=\sum _{i}\left[ \frac{1}{2}\sum _{j\neq i}D_{ij}V^{pair}_{ij}(r_{ij})-c_{i}D_{ii}\sqrt{\rho_{i}}\right] ,
406 < \end{equation}
407 < where $V^{pair}_{ij}$ and $\rho_{i}$ are given by
408 < \begin{equation}
409 < \label{eq:SCP2}
410 < V^{pair}_{ij}(r)=\left( \frac{\alpha_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right)^{n_{ij}}, \rho_{i}=\sum_{j\neq i}\left( \frac{\alpha_{ij}}{r_{ij}}\right) ^{m_{ij}}.
411 < \end{equation}
412 < $V^{pair}_{ij}$ is a repulsive pairwise potential that accounts for
413 < interactions between the pseudoatom cores. The $\sqrt{\rho_i}$ term in
414 < Eq. (\ref{eq:SCP1}) is an attractive many-body potential that models
415 < the interactions between the valence electrons and the cores of the
416 < pseudo-atoms. $D_{ij}$, $D_{ii}$ set the appropriate overall energy
417 < scale, $c_i$ scales the attractive portion of the potential relative
418 < to the repulsive interaction and $\alpha_{ij}$ is a length parameter
419 < that assures a dimensionless form for $\rho$. These parameters are
420 < tuned to various experimental properties such as the density, cohesive
421 < energy, and elastic moduli for FCC transition metals. The quantum
422 < Sutton-Chen ({\sc q-sc}) formulation matches these properties while
423 < including zero-point quantum corrections for different transition
424 < metals.\cite{PhysRevB.59.3527} This particular parametarization has
425 < been shown to reproduce the experimentally available heat of mixing
426 < data for both FCC solid solutions of Ag-Cu and the high-temperature
427 < liquid.\cite{sheng:184203} In contrast, the {\sc eam} potential does
428 < not reproduce the experimentally observed heat of mixing for the
429 < liquid alloy.\cite{MURRAY:1984lr} In this work, we have utilized the
430 < {\sc q-sc} formulation for our potential energies and forces.
431 < Combination rules for the alloy were taken to be the arithmetic
432 < average of the atomic parameters with the exception of $c_i$ since its
433 < values is only dependent on the identity of the atom where the density
434 < is evaluated.  For the {\sc q-sc} potential, cutoff distances are
435 < traditionally taken to be $2\alpha_{ij}$ and include up to the sixth
436 < coordination shell in FCC metals.
89 > The Quantum Sutton-Chen model ({\sc q-sc}) for metallic interactions has been chosen as the potential model for these simulations. ({\sc q-sc}) is discussed in some detail in section Section~\ref{introSec:tightbind} This particular parametarization has been shown to reproduce the experimentally available heat of mixing data for both FCC solid solutions of Ag-Cu and the high-temperature liquid.\cite{sheng:184203} In contrast, the {\sc eam} potential does not reproduce the experimentally observed heat of mixing for the liquid alloy.\cite{MURRAY:1984lr} Combination rules for the alloy were taken to be the arithmetic average of the atomic parameters with the exception of $c_i$ since its values is only dependent on the identity of the atom where the density is evaluated. For the {\sc q-sc} potential, cutoff distances are traditionally taken to be $2\alpha_{ij}$ and include up to the sixth coordination shell in FCC metals.
90  
91   %\subsection{Sampling single-temperature configurations from a cooling
92   %trajectory}
93 <
94 < To better understand the structural changes occurring in the
95 < nanoparticles throughout the cooling trajectory, configurations were
96 < sampled at regular intervals during the cooling trajectory. These
444 < configurations were then allowed to evolve under NVE dynamics to
445 < sample from the proper distribution in phase space. Fig.
446 < \ref{fig:images_cooling_time_traces} illustrates this sampling.
447 <
448 <
449 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
450 <        \centering
451 <                \includegraphics[height=3in]{images/cooling_time_traces.pdf}
452 <        \caption{Illustrative cooling profile for the 40 {\AA}
453 < nanoparticle evolving under stochastic boundary conditions
454 < corresponding to $G=$$87.5\times 10^{6}$
455 < $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$. At temperatures along the cooling
456 < trajectory, configurations were sampled and allowed to evolve in the
457 < NVE ensemble. These subsequent trajectories were analyzed for
458 < structural features associated with bulk glass formation.}
459 <        \label{fig:images_cooling_time_traces}
93 > To better understand the structural changes occurring in the nanoparticles throughout the cooling trajectory, configurations were sampled at regular intervals during the cooling trajectory. These configurations were then allowed to evolve under NVE dynamics to sample from the proper distribution in phase space. Fig. \ref{fig:images_cooling_time_traces} illustrates this sampling. These subsequent trajectories were analyzed for structural features associated with bulk glass formation.
94 > \begin{figure}
95 >        [htbp] \centering
96 >        \includegraphics[height=3in]{images/cooling_time_traces.pdf} \caption{Illustrative cooling profile for the 40 {\AA} nanoparticle evolving under stochastic boundary conditions corresponding to $G=$$87.5\times 10^{6}$ $(\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}})$.} \label{fig:images_cooling_time_traces}
97   \end{figure}
98 <
99 <
100 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
464 < \centering
465 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/cross_section_array.jpg}
466 < \caption{Cutaway views of 30 \AA\ Ag-Cu nanoparticle structures for
467 < random alloy (top) and Cu (core) / Ag (shell) initial conditions
468 < (bottom).  Shown from left to right are the crystalline, liquid
469 < droplet, and final glassy bead configurations.}
470 < \label{fig:cross_sections}
98 > \begin{figure}
99 >        [htbp] \centering
100 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/cross_section_array.jpg} \caption{Cutaway views of 30 \AA\ Ag-Cu nanoparticle structures for random alloy (top) and Cu (core) / Ag (shell) initial conditions (bottom). Shown from left to right are the crystalline, liquid droplet, and final glassy bead configurations.} \label{fig:cross_sections}
101   \end{figure}
102  
103 < \section{ANALYSIS}
103 > \section{Analysis}
104  
105 < Frank first proposed local icosahedral ordering of atoms as an
476 < explanation for supercooled atomic (specifically metallic) liquids,
477 < and further showed that a 13-atom icosahedral cluster has a 8.4\%
478 < higher binding energy the either a face centered cubic ({\sc fcc}) or
479 < hexagonal close-packed ({\sc hcp}) crystal structures.\cite{19521106}
480 < Icosahedra also have six five-fold symmetry axes that cannot be
481 < extended indefinitely in three dimensions; long-range translational
482 < order is therefore incommensurate with local icosahedral ordering.
483 < This does not preclude icosahedral clusters from possessing long-range
484 < {\it orientational} order. The ``frustrated'' packing of these
485 < icosahedral structures into dense clusters has been proposed as a
486 < model for glass formation.\cite{19871127} The size of the icosahedral
487 < clusters is thought to increase until frustration prevents any further
488 < growth.\cite{HOARE:1976fk} Molecular dynamics simulations of a
489 < two-component Lennard-Jones glass showed that clusters of face-sharing
490 < icosahedra are distributed throughout the
491 < material.\cite{PhysRevLett.60.2295} Simulations of freezing of single
492 < component metalic nanoclusters have shown a tendency for icosohedral
493 < structure formation particularly at the surfaces of these
494 < clusters.\cite{Gafner:2004bg,PhysRevLett.89.275502,Chen:2004ec}
495 < Experimentally, the splitting (or shoulder) on the second peak of the
496 < X-ray structure factor in binary metallic glasses has been attributed
497 < to the formation of tetrahedra that share faces of adjoining
498 < icosahedra.\cite{Waal:1995lr}
105 > Frank first proposed local icosahedral ordering of atoms as an explanation for supercooled atomic (specifically metallic) liquids, and further showed that a 13-atom icosahedral cluster has a 8.4\% higher binding energy the either a face centered cubic ({\sc fcc}) or hexagonal close-packed ({\sc hcp}) crystal structures.\cite{19521106} Icosahedra also have six five-fold symmetry axes that cannot be extended indefinitely in three dimensions; long-range translational order is therefore incommensurate with local icosahedral ordering. This does not preclude icosahedral clusters from possessing long-range {\it orientational} order. The ``frustrated'' packing of these icosahedral structures into dense clusters has been proposed as a model for glass formation.\cite{19871127} The size of the icosahedral clusters is thought to increase until frustration prevents any further growth.\cite{HOARE:1976fk} Molecular dynamics simulations of a two-component Lennard-Jones glass showed that clusters of face-sharing icosahedra are distributed throughout the material.\cite{PhysRevLett.60.2295} Simulations of freezing of single component metalic nanoclusters have shown a tendency for icosohedral structure formation particularly at the surfaces of these clusters.\cite{Gafner:2004bg,PhysRevLett.89.275502,Chen:2004ec} Experimentally, the splitting (or shoulder) on the second peak of the X-ray structure factor in binary metallic glasses has been attributed to the formation of tetrahedra that share faces of adjoining icosahedra.\cite{Waal:1995lr}
106  
107 < Various structural probes have been used to characterize structural
501 < order in molecular systems including: common neighbor analysis,
502 < Voronoi tesselations, and orientational bond-order
503 < parameters.\cite{HoneycuttJ.Dana_j100303a014,Iwamatsu:2007lr,hsu:4974,nose:1803}
504 < The method that has been used most extensively for determining local
505 < and extended orientational symmetry in condensed phases is the
506 < bond-orientational analysis formulated by Steinhart {\it et
507 < al.}\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} In this model, a set of spherical
508 < harmonics is associated with each of the near neighbors of a central
509 < atom.  Neighbors (or ``bonds'') are defined as having a distance from
510 < the central atom that is within the first peak in the radial
511 < distribution function. The spherical harmonic between a central atom
512 < $i$ and a neighboring atom $j$ is
107 > Various structural probes have been used to characterize structural order in molecular systems including: common neighbor analysis, Voronoi tesselations, and orientational bond-order parameters.\cite{HoneycuttJ.Dana_j100303a014,Iwamatsu:2007lr,hsu:4974,nose:1803} The method that has been used most extensively for determining local and extended orientational symmetry in condensed phases is the bond-orientational analysis formulated by Steinhart {\it et al.}\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} In this model, a set of spherical harmonics is associated with each of the near neighbors of a central atom. Neighbors (or ``bonds'') are defined as having a distance from the central atom that is within the first peak in the radial distribution function. The spherical harmonic between a central atom $i$ and a neighboring atom $j$ is
108   \begin{equation}
109 < Y_{lm}\left(\vec{r}_{ij}\right)=Y_{lm}\left(\theta(\vec{r}_{ij}),\phi(\vec{r}_{ij})\right)
515 < \label{eq:spharm}
109 >        Y_{lm}\left(\vec{r}_{ij}\right)=Y_{lm}\left(\theta(\vec{r}_{ij}),\phi(\vec{r}_{ij})\right) \label{eq:spharm}
110   \end{equation}
111 < where, $\{ Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)\}$ are spherical harmonics, and
518 < $\theta(\vec{r})$ and $\phi(\vec{r})$ are the polar and azimuthal
519 < angles made by the bond vector $\vec{r}$ with respect to a reference
520 < coordinate system. We chose for simplicity the origin as defined by
521 < the coordinates for our nanoparticle. (Only even-$l$ spherical
522 < harmonics are considered since permutation of a pair of identical
523 < particles should not affect the bond-order parameter.) The local
524 < environment surrounding atom $i$ can be defined by
525 < the average over all neighbors, $N_b(i)$, surrounding that atom,
111 > where, $\{ Y_{lm}(\theta,\phi)\}$ are spherical harmonics, and $\theta(\vec{r})$ and $\phi(\vec{r})$ are the polar and azimuthal angles made by the bond vector $\vec{r}$ with respect to a reference coordinate system. For simplicity the origin is chosen as defined by the coordinates for our nanoparticle. (Only even-$l$ spherical harmonics are considered since permutation of a pair of identical particles should not affect the bond-order parameter.) The local environment surrounding atom $i$ can be defined by the average over all neighbors, $N_b(i)$, surrounding that atom,
112   \begin{equation}
113 < \bar{q}_{lm}(i) = \frac{1}{N_{b}(i)}\sum_{j=1}^{N_b(i)} Y_{lm}(\vec{r}_{ij}).
528 < \label{eq:local_avg_bo}
113 >        \bar{q}_{lm}(i) = \frac{1}{N_{b}(i)}\sum_{j=1}^{N_b(i)} Y_{lm}(\vec{r}_{ij}). \label{eq:local_avg_bo}
114   \end{equation}
115 < We can further define a global average orientational-bond order over
531 < all $\bar{q}_{lm}$ by calculating the average of $\bar{q}_{lm}(i)$
532 < over all $N$ particles
115 > A global average orientational-bond order over all $\bar{q}_{lm}$ by calculating the average of $\bar{q}_{lm}(i)$ over all $N$ particles can be further defined as
116   \begin{equation}
117 < \bar{Q}_{lm} = \frac{\sum^{N}_{i=1}N_{b}(i)\bar{q}_{lm}(i)}{\sum^{N}_{i=1}N_{b}(i)}
535 < \label{eq:sys_avg_bo}
117 >        \bar{Q}_{lm} = \frac{\sum^{N}_{i=1}N_{b}(i)\bar{q}_{lm}(i)}{\sum^{N}_{i=1}N_{b}(i)}. \label{eq:sys_avg_bo}
118   \end{equation}
119 < The $\bar{Q}_{lm}$ contained in Eq. (\ref{eq:sys_avg_bo}) is not
538 < necessarily invariant under rotations of the arbitrary reference
539 < coordinate system.  Second- and third-order rotationally invariant
540 < combinations, $Q_l$ and $W_l$, can be taken by summing over $m$ values
541 < of $\bar{Q}_{lm}$,
119 > The $\bar{Q}_{lm}$ contained in Eq. (\ref{eq:sys_avg_bo}) is not necessarily invariant under rotations of the arbitrary reference coordinate system. Second- and third-order rotationally invariant combinations, $Q_l$ and $W_l$, can be taken by summing over $m$ values of $\bar{Q}_{lm}$,
120   \begin{equation}
121 < Q_{l} = \left( \frac{4\pi}{2 l+1} \sum^{l}_{m=-l} \left| \bar{Q}_{lm} \right|^2\right)^{1/2}
544 < \label{eq:sec_ord_inv}
121 >        Q_{l} = \left( \frac{4\pi}{2 l+1} \sum^{l}_{m=-l} \left| \bar{Q}_{lm} \right|^2\right)^{1/2} \label{eq:sec_ord_inv}
122   \end{equation}
123 < and
124 < \begin{equation}
125 < \hat{W}_{l} = \frac{W_{l}}{\left( \sum^{l}_{m=-l} \left| \bar{Q}_{lm} \right|^2\right)^{3/2}}
549 < \label{eq:third_ord_inv}
123 > and
124 > \begin{equation}
125 >        \hat{W}_{l} = \frac{W_{l}}{\left( \sum^{l}_{m=-l} \left| \bar{Q}_{lm} \right|^2\right)^{3/2}} \label{eq:third_ord_inv}
126   \end{equation}
127 < where
128 < \begin{equation}
129 < W_{l} = \sum_{\substack{m_1,m_2,m_3 \\m_1 + m_2 + m_3 = 0}} \left( \begin{array}{ccc} l & l & l \\ m_1 & m_2 & m_3 \end{array}\right) \\ \times \bar{Q}_{lm_1}\bar{Q}_{lm_2}\bar{Q}_{lm_3}.
130 < \label{eq:third_inv}
127 > where
128 > \begin{equation}
129 >        W_{l} = \sum_{\substack{m_1,m_2,m_3 \\m_1 + m_2 + m_3 = 0}} \left(
130 >        \begin{array}{ccc}
131 >                l & l & l \\
132 >                m_1 & m_2 & m_3
133 >        \end{array}
134 >        \right) \\
135 >        \times \bar{Q}_{lm_1}\bar{Q}_{lm_2}\bar{Q}_{lm_3}. \label{eq:third_inv}
136   \end{equation}
137 < The factor in parentheses in Eq. (\ref{eq:third_inv}) is the Wigner-3$j$
557 < symbol, and the sum is over all valid ($|m| \leq l$) values of $m_1$,
558 < $m_2$, and $m_3$ which sum to zero.
559 <
137 > The factor in parentheses in Eq. (\ref{eq:third_inv}) is the Wigner-3$j$ symbol, and the sum is over all valid ($|m| \leq l$) values of $m_1$, $m_2$, and $m_3$ which sum to zero.
138   \begin{table}
139 < \caption{Values of bond orientational order parameters for
140 < simple structures cooresponding to $l=4$ and $l=6$ spherical harmonic
141 < functions.\cite{wolde:9932} $Q_4$ and $\hat{W}_4$ have values for {\it
142 < individual} icosahedral clusters, but these values are not invariant
143 < under rotations of the reference coordinate systems.  Similar behavior
144 < is observed in the bond-orientational order parameters for individual
145 < liquid-like structures.}
146 < \begin{center}
147 < \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
148 < \hline
149 < \hline
150 <   & $Q_4$ & $Q_6$ & $\hat{W}_4$ & $\hat{W}_6$\\
139 >        \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
140 >                \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
141 >                \caption[VALUES OF BOND ORIENTATIONAL ORDER PARAMETERS FOR SIMPLE STRUCTURES]{VALUES OF BOND ORIENTATIONAL ORDER PARAMETERS FOR SIMPLE STRUCTURES\footnote{Corresponding to $l=4$ AND $l=6$ spherical harmonic functions.\cite{wolde:9932}}\footnote{$Q_4$ and $\hat{W}_4$ have values for {\it individual} icosahedral clusters, but these values are not invariant under rotations of the reference coordinate system.}}
142 >                        
143 >        \centering
144 >                \begin{tabular}
145 >                        {ccccc} \hline \hline & $Q_4$ & $Q_6$ & $\hat{W}_4$ & $\hat{W}_6$\\
146 >                        
147 >                        fcc & 0.191 & 0.575 & -0.159 & -0.013\\
148 >                        
149 >                        hcp & 0.097 & 0.485 & 0.134 & -0.012\\
150 >                        
151 >                        bcc & 0.036 & 0.511 & 0.159 & 0.013\\
152 >                        
153 >                        sc & 0.764 & 0.354 & 0.159 & 0.013\\
154 >                        
155 >                        Icosahedral & - & 0.663 & - & -0.170\\
156 >                        
157 >                        (liquid) & - & - & - & -\\
158 >                        \hline
159 >                \end{tabular}
160 >        \renewcommand{\footnoterule}{}
161 >        \end{minipage}
162 >        \label{table:bopval}
163 > \end{table}
164  
165 < fcc & 0.191 & 0.575 & -0.159 & -0.013\\
165 > For ideal face-centered cubic ({\sc fcc}), body-centered cubic ({\sc bcc}) and simple cubic ({\sc sc}) as well as hexagonally close-packed ({\sc hcp}) structures, these rotationally invariant bond order parameters have fixed values independent of the choice of coordinate reference frames. For ideal icosahedral structures, the $l=6$ invariants, $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ are also independent of the coordinate system. $Q_4$ and $\hat{W}_4$ will have non-vanishing values for {\it individual} icosahedral clusters, but these values are not invariant under rotations of the reference coordinate systems. Similar behavior is observed in the bond-orientational order parameters for individual liquid-like structures. Additionally, both $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ are thought to have extreme values for the icosahedral clusters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This makes the $l=6$ bond-orientational order parameters particularly useful in identifying the extent of local icosahedral ordering in condensed phases. For example, a local structure which exhibits $\hat{W}_6$ values near -0.17 is easily identified as an icosahedral cluster and cannot be mistaken for distorted cubic or liquid-like structures.
166  
167 < hcp & 0.097 & 0.485 & 0.134 & -0.012\\
167 > One may use these bond orientational order parameters as an averaged property to obtain the extent of icosahedral ordering in a supercooled liquid or cluster. It is also possible to accumulate information about the {\it distributions} of local bond orientational order parameters, $p(\hat{W}_6)$ and $p(Q_6)$, which provide information about individual atomic sites that are central to local icosahedral structures.
168  
169 < bcc & 0.036 & 0.511 & 0.159 & 0.013\\
170 <
171 < sc & 0.764 & 0.354 & 0.159 & 0.013\\
172 <
582 < Icosahedral & - & 0.663 & - & -0.170\\
583 <
584 < (liquid) & - & - & - &  -\\
585 < \hline
586 < \end{tabular}
587 < \end{center}
588 < \label{table:bopval}
589 < \end{table}
590 <
591 < For ideal face-centered cubic ({\sc fcc}), body-centered cubic ({\sc
592 < bcc}) and simple cubic ({\sc sc}) as well as hexagonally close-packed
593 < ({\sc hcp}) structures, these rotationally invariant bond order
594 < parameters have fixed values independent of the choice of coordinate
595 < reference frames.  For ideal icosahedral structures, the $l=6$
596 < invariants, $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ are also independent of the
597 < coordinate system.  $Q_4$ and $\hat{W}_4$ will have non-vanishing
598 < values for {\it individual} icosahedral clusters, but these values are
599 < not invariant under rotations of the reference coordinate systems.
600 < Similar behavior is observed in the bond-orientational order
601 < parameters for individual liquid-like structures.  Additionally, both
602 < $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ are thought to have extreme values for the
603 < icosahedral clusters.\cite{Steinhardt:1983mo} This makes the $l=6$
604 < bond-orientational order parameters particularly useful in identifying
605 < the extent of local icosahedral ordering in condensed phases.  For
606 < example, a local structure which exhibits $\hat{W}_6$ values near
607 < -0.17 is easily identified as an icosahedral cluster and cannot be
608 < mistaken for distorted cubic or liquid-like structures.
609 <
610 < One may use these bond orientational order parameters as an averaged
611 < property to obtain the extent of icosahedral ordering in a supercooled
612 < liquid or cluster.  It is also possible to accumulate information
613 < about the {\it distributions} of local bond orientational order
614 < parameters, $p(\hat{W}_6)$ and $p(Q_6)$, which provide information
615 < about individual atomic sites that are central to local icosahedral
616 < structures.
617 <
618 < The distributions of atomic $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ values are plotted
619 < as a function of temperature for our nanoparticles in Fig.
620 < \ref{fig:q6} and \ref{fig:w6}.   At high temperatures, the
621 < distributions are unstructured and are broadly distributed across the
622 < entire range of values.  As the particles are cooled, however, there
623 < is a dramatic increase in the fraction of atomic sites which have
624 < local icosahedral ordering around them.  (This corresponds to the
625 < sharp peak appearing in Fig. \ref{fig:w6} at $\hat{W}_6=-0.17$ and
626 < to the broad shoulder appearing in Fig. \ref{fig:q6} at $Q_6 =
627 < 0.663$.)
628 <
629 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
630 < \centering
631 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/w6_stacked_plot.pdf}
632 < \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter
633 < ($\hat{W}_6$) at different temperatures.  The upper, middle, and lower
634 < panels are for 20, 30, and 40 \AA\ particles, respectively.  The
635 < left-hand column used cooling rates commensurate with a low
636 < interfacial conductance ($87.5 \times 10^{6}$
637 < $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$), while the right-hand column used a more
638 < physically reasonable value of $117 \times 10^{6}$
639 < $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$.  The peak at $\hat{W}_6 \approx -0.17$ is
640 < due to local icosahedral structures.  The different curves in each of
641 < the panels indicate the distribution of $\hat{W}_6$ values for samples
642 < taken at different times along the cooling trajectory.  The initial
643 < and final temperatures (in K) are indicated on the plots adjacent to
644 < their respective distributions.}
645 < \label{fig:w6}
169 > The distributions of atomic $Q_6$ and $\hat{W}_6$ values are plotted as a function of temperature for our nanoparticles in Fig. \ref{fig:w6} and \ref{fig:q6}. At high temperatures, the distributions are unstructured and are broadly distributed across the entire range of values. As the particles are cooled, however, there is a dramatic increase in the fraction of atomic sites which have local icosahedral ordering around them. (This corresponds to the sharp peak appearing in Fig. \ref{fig:w6} at $\hat{W}_6=-0.17$ and to the broad shoulder appearing in Fig. \ref{fig:q6} at $Q_6 = 0.663$.)
170 > \begin{figure}
171 >        [htbp] \centering
172 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/w6_stacked_plot.pdf} \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter ($\hat{W}_6$) at different temperatures (colors). The upper, middle, and lower panels are for 20, 30, and 40 \AA\ particles, respectively. The left-hand column used cooling rates commensurate with a low interfacial conductance ($87.5 \times 10^{6}$ $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$), while the right-hand column used a more physically reasonable value of $117 \times 10^{6}$ $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$. The peak at $\hat{W}_6 \approx -0.17$ is due to local icosahedral structures. The different curves in each of the panels indicate the distribution of $\hat{W}_6$ values for samples taken at different times along the cooling trajectory. The initial and final temperatures (in K) are indicated on the plots adjacent to their respective distributions.} \label{fig:w6}
173   \end{figure}
174 <
175 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
176 < \centering
650 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/q6_stacked_plot.pdf}
651 < \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter
652 < ($Q_6$) at different temperatures.  The curves in the six panels in
653 < this figure were computed at identical conditions to the same panels in
654 < figure \ref{fig:w6}.}
655 < \label{fig:q6}
174 > \begin{figure}
175 >        [htbp] \centering
176 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/q6_stacked_plot.pdf} \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter ($Q_6$) at different temperatures (colors). The curves in the six panels in this figure were computed at identical conditions to the same panels in figure \ref{fig:w6}.} \label{fig:q6}
177   \end{figure}
178  
179 < The probability distributions of local order can be used to generate
659 < free energy surfaces using the local orientational ordering as a
660 < reaction coordinate.  By making the simple statistical equivalence
661 < between the free energy and the probabilities of occupying certain
662 < states,
179 > The probability distributions of local order can be used to generate free energy surfaces using the local orientational ordering as a reaction coordinate. By making the simple statistical equivalence between the free energy and the probabilities of occupying certain states,
180   \begin{equation}
181 < g(\hat{W}_6) = - k_B T \ln p(\hat{W}_6),
181 >        g(\hat{W}_6) = - k_B T \ln p(\hat{W}_6),
182   \end{equation}
183 < we can obtain a sequence of free energy surfaces (as a function of
184 < temperature) for the local ordering around central atoms within our
185 < particles.  Free energy surfaces for the 40 \AA\ particle at a range
186 < of temperatures are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:freeEnergy}.  Note that
670 < at all temperatures, the liquid-like structures are global minima on
671 < the free energy surface, while the local icosahedra appear as local
672 < minima once the temperature has fallen below 528 K.  As the
673 < temperature falls, it is possible for substructures to become trapped
674 < in the local icosahedral well, and if the cooling is rapid enough,
675 < this trapping leads to vitrification.  A similar analysis of the free
676 < energy surface for orientational order in bulk glass formers can be
677 < found in the work of van~Duijneveldt and
678 < Frenkel.\cite{duijneveldt:4655}
679 <
680 <
681 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
682 < \centering
683 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/freeEnergyVsW6.pdf}
684 < \caption{Free energy as a function of the orientational order
685 < parameter ($\hat{W}_6$) for 40 {\AA} bimetallic nanoparticles as they
686 < are cooled from 902 K to 310 K.  As the particles cool below 528 K, a
687 < local minimum in the free energy surface appears near the perfect
688 < icosahedral ordering ($\hat{W}_6 = -0.17$).  At all temperatures,
689 < liquid-like structures are a global minimum on the free energy
690 < surface, but if the cooling rate is fast enough, substructures
691 < may become trapped with local icosahedral order, leading to the
692 < formation of a glass.}
693 < \label{fig:freeEnergy}
183 > a sequence of free energy surfaces (as a function of temperature) was obtained for the local ordering around central atoms within our particles. Free energy surfaces for the 40 \AA\ particle at a range of temperatures are shown in Fig. \ref{fig:freeEnergy}. Note that at all temperatures, the liquid-like structures are global minima on the free energy surface, while the local icosahedra appear as local minima once the temperature has fallen below 528 K. As the temperature falls, it is possible for substructures to become trapped in the local icosahedral well, and if the cooling is rapid enough, this trapping leads to vitrification. A similar analysis of the free energy surface for orientational order in bulk glass formers can be found in the work of van~Duijneveldt and Frenkel.\cite{duijneveldt:4655}
184 > \begin{figure}
185 >        [htbp] \centering
186 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/freeEnergyVsW6.pdf} \caption{Free energy as a function of the orientational order parameter ($\hat{W}_6$) for 40 {\AA} bimetallic nanoparticles as they are cooled from 902 K to 310 K. As the particles cool below 528 K, a local minimum in the free energy surface appears near the perfect icosahedral ordering ($\hat{W}_6 = -0.17$). At all temperatures, liquid-like structures are a global minimum on the free energy surface, but if the cooling rate is fast enough, substructures may become trapped with local icosahedral order, leading to the formation of a glass.} \label{fig:freeEnergy}
187   \end{figure}
188  
189 < We have also calculated the fraction of atomic centers which have
697 < strong local icosahedral order:
189 > The fraction of atomic centers which have strong local icosahedral order have also been calculated:
190   \begin{equation}
191 < f_\textrm{icos} = \int_{-\infty}^{w_i} p(\hat{W}_6) d \hat{W}_6
700 < \label{eq:ficos}
191 >        f_\textrm{icos} = \int_{-\infty}^{w_i} p(\hat{W}_6) d \hat{W}_6 \label{eq:ficos}
192   \end{equation}
193 < where $w_i$ is a cutoff value in $\hat{W}_6$ for atomic centers that
194 < are displaying icosahedral environments.  We have chosen a (somewhat
195 < arbitrary) value of $w_i= -0.15$ for the purposes of this work.  A
196 < plot of $f_\textrm{icos}(T)$ as a function of temperature of the
197 < particles is given in Fig. \ref{fig:ficos}.  As the particles cool,
707 < the fraction of local icosahedral ordering rises smoothly to a plateau
708 < value.  The smaller particles (particularly the ones that were cooled
709 < in a higher viscosity solvent) show a slightly larger tendency towards
710 < icosahedral ordering.
193 > where $w_i$ is a cutoff value in $\hat{W}_6$ for atomic centers that are displaying icosahedral environments. A (somewhat arbitrary) value of $w_i= -0.15$ has been chosen for the purposes of this work. A plot of $f_\textrm{icos}(T)$ as a function of temperature of the particles is given in Fig. \ref{fig:ficos}. As the particles cool, the fraction of local icosahedral ordering rises smoothly to a plateau value. The smaller particles (particularly the ones that were cooled in a higher viscosity solvent) show a slightly larger tendency towards icosahedral ordering.
194 > \begin{figure}
195 >        [htbp] \centering
196 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/fraction_icos.pdf} \caption{Temperature dependence of the fraction of atoms with local icosahedral ordering, $f_\textrm{icos}(T)$ for 20, 30, and 40 \AA\ particles cooled at two different values of the interfacial conductance.} \label{fig:ficos}
197 > \end{figure}
198  
199 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
200 < \centering
201 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/fraction_icos.pdf}
202 < \caption{Temperautre dependence of the fraction of atoms with local
716 < icosahedral ordering, $f_\textrm{icos}(T)$ for 20, 30, and 40 \AA\
717 < particles cooled at two different values of the interfacial
718 < conductance.}
719 < \label{fig:ficos}
199 > Since atomic-level resolution of the local bond-orientational ordering information is available, the local ordering as a function of the identities of the central atoms can be determined. In figure \ref{fig:AgVsCu} the distributions of $\hat{W}_6$ values for both the silver and copper atoms is displayed, and it should be noted that there is a strong predilection for the copper atoms to be central to icosahedra. This is probably due to local packing competition of the larger silver atoms around the copper, which would tend to favor icosahedral structures over the more densely packed cubic structures.
200 > \begin{figure}
201 >        [htbp] \centering
202 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/w6_stacked_bytype_plot.pdf} \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter ($\hat{W}_6$) for the two different elements present in the nanoparticles. This distribution was taken from the fully-cooled 40 \AA\ nanoparticle. Local icosahedral ordering around copper atoms is much more prevalent than around silver atoms.} \label{fig:AgVsCu}
203   \end{figure}
204  
205 < Since we have atomic-level resolution of the local bond-orientational
723 < ordering information, we can also look at the local ordering as a
724 < function of the identities of the central atoms.  In figure
725 < \ref{fig:AgVsCu} we display the distributions of $\hat{W}_6$ values
726 < for both the silver and copper atoms, and we note a strong
727 < predilection for the copper atoms to be central to icosahedra.  This
728 < is probably due to local packing competition of the larger silver
729 < atoms around the copper, which would tend to favor icosahedral
730 < structures over the more densely packed cubic structures.
205 > The locations of these icosahedral centers are not uniformly distrubted throughout the particles. In Fig. \ref{fig:icoscluster} we show snapshots of the centers of the local icosahedra (i.e. any atom which exhibits a local bond orientational order parameter $\hat{W}_6 < -0.15$). At high temperatures, the icosahedral centers are transitory, existing only for a few fs before being reabsorbed into the liquid droplet. As the particle cools, these centers become fixed at certain locations, and additional icosahedra develop throughout the particle, clustering around the sites where the structures originated. There is a strong preference for icosahedral ordering near the surface of the particles. Identification of these structures by the type of atom shows that the silver-centered icosahedra are evident only at the surface of the particles.
206  
732 \begin{figure}[htbp]
733 \centering
734 \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/w6_stacked_bytype_plot.pdf}
735 \caption{Distributions of the bond orientational order parameter
736 ($\hat{W}_6$) for the two different elements present in the
737 nanoparticles.  This distribution was taken from the fully-cooled 40
738 \AA\ nanoparticle.  Local icosahedral ordering around copper atoms is
739 much more prevalent than around silver atoms.}
740 \label{fig:AgVsCu}
741 \end{figure}
207  
208 < The locations of these icosahedral centers are not uniformly
209 < distrubted throughout the particles.  In Fig. \ref{fig:icoscluster}
210 < we show snapshots of the centers of the local icosahedra (i.e. any
211 < atom which exhibits a local bond orientational order parameter
212 < $\hat{W}_6 < -0.15$).  At high temperatures, the icosahedral centers
213 < are transitory, existing only for a few fs before being reabsorbed
214 < into the liquid droplet.  As the particle cools, these centers become
215 < fixed at certain locations, and additional icosahedra develop
216 < throughout the particle, clustering around the sites where the
217 < structures originated.  There is a strong preference for icosahedral
753 < ordering near the surface of the particles.  Identification of these
754 < structures by the type of atom shows that the silver-centered
755 < icosahedra are evident only at the surface of the particles.
208 > \begin{sidewaysfigure}  
209 >        \centering
210 >        \begin{tabular}
211 >                {c c c}
212 >                \includegraphics[width=2.1in]{images/Cu_Ag_random_30A_liq_icosonly.pdf}
213 >                \includegraphics[width=2.1in]{images/Cu_Ag_random_30A__0007_icosonly.pdf}
214 >                \includegraphics[width=2.1in]{images/Cu_Ag_random_30A_glass_icosonly.pdf}
215 >        \end{tabular}
216 >        \caption{Centers of local icosahedral order ($\hat{W}_6<0.15$) at 900 K, 471 K and 315 K for the 30 \AA\ nanoparticle cooled with an interfacial conductance $G = 87.5 \times 10^{6}$ $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$. Silver atoms (blue) exhibit icosahedral order at the surface of the nanoparticle while copper icosahedral centers (green) are distributed throughout the nanoparticle. The icosahedral centers appear to cluster together and these clusters increase in size with decreasing temperature.} \label{fig:icoscluster}
217 > \end{sidewaysfigure}
218  
757 \begin{figure}[htbp]
758 \centering
759 \begin{tabular}{c c c}
760 \includegraphics[width=2.1in]{images/Cu_Ag_random_30A_liq_icosonly.pdf}
761 \includegraphics[width=2.1in]{images/Cu_Ag_random_30A__0007_icosonly.pdf}
762 \includegraphics[width=2.1in]{images/Cu_Ag_random_30A_glass_icosonly.pdf}
763 \end{tabular}
764 \caption{Centers of local icosahedral order ($\hat{W}_6<0.15$) at 900
765 K, 471 K and 315 K for the 30 \AA\ nanoparticle cooled with an
766 interfacial conductance $G = 87.5 \times 10^{6}$
767 $\mathrm{Wm^{-2}K^{-1}}$. Silver atoms (blue) exhibit icosahedral
768 order at the surface of the nanoparticle while copper icosahedral
769 centers (green) are distributed throughout the nanoparticle.  The
770 icosahedral centers appear to cluster together and these clusters
771 increase in size with decreasing temperature.}
772 \label{fig:icoscluster}
773 \end{figure}
219  
775 In contrast with the silver ordering behavior, the copper atoms which
776 have local icosahedral ordering are distributed more evenly throughout
777 the nanoparticles.  Fig. \ref{fig:Surface} shows this tendency as a
778 function of distance from the center of the nanoparticle.  Silver,
779 since it has a lower surface free energy than copper, tends to coat
780 the skins of the mixed particles.\cite{Zhu:1997lr} This is true even
781 for bimetallic particles that have been prepared in the Ag (core) / Cu
782 (shell) configuration.  Upon forming a liquid droplet, approximately 1
783 monolayer of Ag atoms will rise to the surface of the particles.  This
784 can be seen visually in Fig. \ref{fig:cross_sections} as well as in
785 the density plots in the bottom panel of Fig. \ref{fig:Surface}.
786 This observation is consistent with previous experimental and
787 theoretical studies on bimetallic alloys composed of noble
788 metals.\cite{MainardiD.S._la0014306,HuangS.-P._jp0204206,Ramirez-Caballero:2006lr}
789 Bond order parameters for surface atoms are averaged only over the
790 neighboring atoms, so packing constraints that may prevent icosahedral
791 ordering around silver in the bulk are removed near the surface.  It
792 would certainly be interesting to see if the relative tendency of
793 silver and copper to form local icosahedral structures in a bulk glass
794 differs from our observations on nanoparticles.
220  
221 < \begin{figure}[htbp]
222 < \centering
223 < \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/dens_fracr_stacked_plot.pdf}
224 < \caption{Appearance of icosahedral clusters around central silver atoms
800 < is largely due to the presence of these silver atoms at or near the
801 < surface of the nanoparticle. The upper panel shows the fraction of
802 < icosahedral atoms ($f_\textrm{icos}(r)$ for each of the two metallic
803 < atoms as a function of distance from the center of the nanoparticle
804 < ($r$).  The lower panel shows the radial density of the two
805 < constituent metals (relative to the overall density of the
806 < nanoparticle).  Icosahedral clustering around copper atoms are more
807 < evenly distributed throughout the particle, while icosahedral
808 < clustering around silver is largely confined to the silver atoms at
809 < the surface.}
810 < \label{fig:Surface}
221 > In contrast with the silver ordering behavior, the copper atoms which have local icosahedral ordering are distributed more evenly throughout the nanoparticles. Fig. \ref{fig:Surface} shows this tendency as a function of distance from the center of the nanoparticle. Silver, since it has a lower surface free energy than copper, tends to coat the skins of the mixed particles.\cite{Zhu:1997lr} This is true even for bimetallic particles that have been prepared in the Ag (core) / Cu (shell) configuration. Upon forming a liquid droplet, approximately 1 monolayer of Ag atoms will rise to the surface of the particles. This can be seen visually in Fig. \ref{fig:cross_sections} as well as in the density plots in the bottom panel of Fig. \ref{fig:Surface}. This observation is consistent with previous experimental and theoretical studies on bimetallic alloys composed of noble metals.\cite{MainardiD.S._la0014306,HuangS.-P._jp0204206,Ramirez-Caballero:2006lr} Bond order parameters for surface atoms are averaged only over the neighboring atoms, so packing constraints that may prevent icosahedral ordering around silver in the bulk are removed near the surface. It would certainly be interesting to see if the relative tendency of silver and copper to form local icosahedral structures in a bulk glass differs from our observations on nanoparticles.
222 > \begin{figure}
223 >        [htbp] \centering
224 >        \includegraphics[width=5in]{images/dens_fracr_stacked_plot.pdf} \caption{Appearance of icosahedral clusters around central silver atoms is largely due to the presence of these silver atoms at or near the surface of the nanoparticle. The upper panel shows the fraction of icosahedral atoms ($f_\textrm{icos}(r)$ for each of the two metallic atoms as a function of distance from the center of the nanoparticle ($r$). The lower panel shows the radial density of the two constituent metals (relative to the overall density of the nanoparticle). Icosahedral clustering around copper atoms are more evenly distributed throughout the particle, while icosahedral clustering around silver is largely confined to the silver atoms at the surface.} \label{fig:Surface}
225   \end{figure}
226  
227 < The methods used by Sheng, He, and Ma to estimate the glass transition
814 < temperature, $T_g$, in bulk Ag-Cu alloys involve finding
815 < discontinuities in the slope of the average atomic volume, $\langle V
816 < \rangle / N$, or enthalpy when plotted against the temperature of the
817 < alloy.  They obtained a bulk glass transition temperature, $T_g$ = 510
818 < K for a quenching rate of $2.5 \times 10^{13}$ K/s.
227 > The methods used by Sheng, He, and Ma to estimate the glass transition temperature, $T_g$, in bulk Ag-Cu alloys involve finding discontinuities in the slope of the average atomic volume, $\langle V \rangle / N$, or enthalpy when plotted against the temperature of the alloy. They obtained a bulk glass transition temperature, $T_g$ = 510 K for a quenching rate of $2.5 \times 10^{13}$ K/s.
228  
229 < For simulations of nanoparticles, there is no periodic box, and
821 < therefore, no easy way to compute the volume exactly.  Instead, we
822 < estimate the volume of our nanoparticles using Barber {\it et al.}'s
823 < very fast quickhull algorithm to obtain the convex hull for the
824 < collection of 3-d coordinates of all of atoms at each point in
825 < time.~\cite{barber96quickhull,qhull} The convex hull is the smallest convex
826 < polyhedron which includes all of the atoms, so the volume of this
827 < polyhedron is an excellent estimate of the volume of the nanoparticle.
828 < This method of estimating the volume will be problematic if the
829 < nanoparticle breaks into pieces (i.e. if the bounding surface becomes
830 < concave), but for the relatively short trajectories used in this
831 < study, it provides an excellent measure of particle volume as a
832 < function of time (and temperature).
229 > For simulations of nanoparticles, there is no periodic box, and therefore, no easy way to compute the volume exactly. Instead, the volume of our nanoparticles is estimated using Barber {\it et al.}'s very fast quickhull algorithm to obtain the convex hull for the collection of 3-d coordinates of all of atoms at each point in time.~\cite{barber96quickhull,qhull} The convex hull is the smallest convex polyhedron which includes all of the atoms, so the volume of this polyhedron is an excellent estimate of the volume of the nanoparticle. This method of estimating the volume will be problematic if the nanoparticle breaks into pieces (i.e. if the bounding surface becomes concave), but for the relatively short trajectories used in this study, it provides an excellent measure of particle volume as a function of time (and temperature).
230  
231 < Using the discontinuity in the slope of the average atomic volume
835 < vs. temperature, we arrive at an estimate of $T_g$ that is
836 < approximately 488 K.  We note that this temperature is somewhat below
837 < the onset of icosahedral ordering exhibited in the bond orientational
838 < order parameters. It appears that icosahedral ordering sets in while
839 < the system is still somewhat fluid, and is locked in place once the
840 < temperature falls below $T_g$.  We did not observe any dependence of
841 < our estimates for $T_g$ on either the nanoparticle size or the value
842 < of the interfacial conductance.  However, the cooling rates and size
843 < ranges we utilized are all sampled from a relatively narrow range, and
844 < it is possible that much larger particles would have substantially
845 < different values for $T_g$.  Our estimates for the glass transition
846 < temperatures for all three particle sizes and both interfacial
847 < conductance values are shown in table \ref{table:Tg}.
231 > Using the discontinuity in the slope of the average atomic volume vs. temperature, an estimate of $T_g$ is arrived at that is approximately 488 K. It should be noted that this temperature is somewhat below the onset of icosahedral ordering exhibited in the bond orientational order parameters. It appears that icosahedral ordering sets in while the system is still somewhat fluid, and is locked in place once the temperature falls below $T_g$. No dependence of our estimates for $T_g$ on either the nanoparticle size or the value of the interfacial conductance was observed. However, the cooling rates and size ranges utilized in these simulations are all sampled from a relatively narrow range, and it is possible that much larger particles would have substantially different values for $T_g$. Estimates for the glass transition temperatures for all three particle sizes and both interfacial conductance values are shown in table \ref{table:Tg}.
232  
233 < \begin{table}
234 < \caption{Estimates of the glass transition temperatures $T_g$ for
235 < three different sizes of bimetallic Ag$_6$Cu$_4$ nanoparticles cooled
236 < under two different values of the interfacial conductance, $G$.}
237 < \begin{center}
238 < \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
239 < \hline
240 < \hline
241 < Radius (\AA\ ) & Interfacial conductance & Effective cooling rate
242 < (K/s $\times 10^{13}$) &  & $T_g$ (K) \\
243 < 20 & 87.5 & 2.4 & 477 \\
244 < 20 & 117  & 4.5 & 502 \\
245 < 30 & 87.5 & 1.3 & 491 \\
246 < 30 & 117  & 1.9 & 493 \\
247 < 40 & 87.5 & 1.0 & 476 \\
248 < 40 & 117  & 1.3 & 487 \\
249 < \hline
250 < \end{tabular}
251 < \end{center}
868 < \label{table:Tg}
869 < \end{table}
233 > \begin{sidewaystable}
234 >        \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
235 >                \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
236 >                \caption[ESTIMATES OF THE GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURES $T_G$]{ ESTIMATES OF THE GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURES $T_G$\footnote{Cooled under two different values of the interfacial conductance, $G$}}  
237 >        \centering      
238 >                \begin{tabular}
239 >                        {ccccc} \hline \hline Radius (\AA\ ) & Interfacial conductance & Effective cooling rate (K/s $\times 10^{13}$) & & $T_g$ (K) \\
240 >                        20 & 87.5 & 2.4 & 477 \\
241 >                        20 & 117 & 4.5 & 502 \\
242 >                        30 & 87.5 & 1.3 & 491 \\
243 >                        30 & 117 & 1.9 & 493 \\
244 >                        40 & 87.5 & 1.0 & 476 \\
245 >                        40 & 117 & 1.3 & 487 \\
246 >                        \hline
247 >                \end{tabular}
248 >        \renewcommand{\footnoterule}{}
249 >        \end{minipage}
250 >        \label{table:Tg}
251 > \end{sidewaystable}
252  
253 < \section{CONCLUSIONS}
872 < \label{metglass:sec:conclusion}
253 > \section{Conclusions} \label{metglass:sec:conclusion}
254  
255 < Our heat-transfer calculations have utilized the best current
875 < estimates of the interfacial heat transfer coefficient (G) from recent
876 < experiments.  Using reasonable values for thermal conductivity in both
877 < the metallic particle and the surrounding solvent, we have obtained
878 < cooling rates for laser-heated nanoparticles that are in excess of
879 < 10$^{13}$ K / s.  To test whether or not this cooling rate can form
880 < glassy nanoparticles, we have performed a mixed molecular dynamics
881 < simulation in which the atoms in contact with the solvent or capping
882 < agent are evolved under Langevin dynamics while the remaining atoms
883 < are evolved under Newtonian dynamics.  The effective solvent viscosity
884 < ($\eta$) is a free parameter which we have tuned so that the particles
885 < in the simulation follow the same cooling curve as their experimental
886 < counterparts.  From the local icosahedral ordering around the atoms in
887 < the nanoparticles (particularly Copper atoms), we deduce that it is
888 < likely that glassy nanobeads are created via laser heating of
889 < bimetallic nanoparticles, particularly when the initial temperature of
890 < the particles approaches the melting temperature of the bulk metal
891 < alloy.
255 > Heat-transfer calculations have utilized the best current estimates of the interfacial heat transfer coefficient (G) from recent experiments. Using reasonable values for thermal conductivity in both the metallic particle and the surrounding solvent, cooling rates for laser-heated nanoparticles that are in excess of 10$^{13}$ K / s have been obtained. To test whether or not this cooling rate can form glassy nanoparticles, a mixed molecular dynamics simulation has been performed in which the atoms in contact with the solvent or capping agent are evolved under Langevin dynamics while the remaining atoms are evolved under Newtonian dynamics. The effective solvent viscosity ($\eta$) is a free parameter which we have tuned so that the particles in the simulation follow the same cooling curve as their experimental counterparts. From the local icosahedral ordering around the atoms in the nanoparticles (particularly Copper atoms), it has been deduced that it is likely that glassy nanobeads are created via laser heating of bimetallic nanoparticles, particularly when the initial temperature of the particles approaches the melting temperature of the bulk metal alloy.
256  
257 < Improvements to our calculations would require: 1) explicit treatment
894 < of the capping agent and solvent, 2) another radial region to handle
895 < the heat transfer to the solvent vapor layer that is likely to form
896 < immediately surrounding the hot
897 < particle,\cite{Hu:2004lr,kotaidis:184702} and 3) larger particles in
898 < the size range most easily studied via laser heating experiments.
257 > Improvements to these calculations would require: 1) explicit treatment of the capping agent and solvent, 2) another radial region to handle the heat transfer to the solvent vapor layer that is likely to form immediately surrounding the hot particle,\cite{Hu:2004lr,kotaidis:184702} and 3) larger particles in the size range most easily studied via laser heating experiments.
258  
259 < The local icosahedral ordering we observed in these bimetallic
901 < particles is centered almost completely around the copper atoms, and
902 < this is likely due to the size mismatch leading to a more efficient
903 < packing of 5-membered rings of silver around a central copper atom.
904 < This size mismatch should be reflected in bulk calculations, and work
905 < is ongoing in our lab to confirm this observation in bulk
906 < glass-formers.
259 > The local icosahedral ordering we observed in these bimetallic particles is centered almost completely around the copper atoms, and this is likely due to the size mismatch leading to a more efficient packing of 5-membered rings of silver around a central copper atom. This size mismatch should be reflected in bulk calculations.
260  
261 < The physical properties (bulk modulus, frequency of the breathing
909 < mode, and density) of glassy nanobeads should be somewhat different
910 < from their crystalline counterparts.  However, observation of these
911 < differences may require single-particle resolution of the ultrafast
912 < vibrational spectrum of one particle both before and after the
913 < crystallite has been converted into a glassy bead.
261 > The physical properties (bulk modulus, frequency of the breathing mode, and density) of glassy nanobeads should be somewhat different from their crystalline counterparts. However, observation of these differences may require single-particle resolution of the ultrafast vibrational spectrum of one particle both before and after the crystallite has been converted into a glassy bead.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines