1 |
|
%\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4} |
2 |
|
\documentclass[12pt]{article} |
3 |
< |
\usepackage{endfloat} |
3 |
> |
%\usepackage{endfloat} |
4 |
|
\usepackage{amsmath} |
5 |
|
\usepackage{amssymb} |
6 |
|
\usepackage{epsf} |
23 |
|
|
24 |
|
\begin{document} |
25 |
|
|
26 |
< |
This document includes system based comparisons of the studied methods with smooth particle-mesh Ewald. Each of the seven systems comprises it's own section and has it's own discussion and tabular listing of the results for the $\Delta E$, force and torque vector magnitude, and force and torque vector direction comparisons. |
26 |
> |
This document includes individual system-based comparisons of the |
27 |
> |
studied methods with smooth particle-mesh Ewald. Each of the seven |
28 |
> |
systems comprises its own section and has its own discussion and |
29 |
> |
tabular listing of the results for the $\Delta E$, force and torque |
30 |
> |
vector magnitude, and force and torque vector direction comparisons. |
31 |
|
|
32 |
< |
\section{\label{app-water}Liquid Water} |
32 |
> |
\section{\label{app:water}Liquid Water} |
33 |
|
|
34 |
+ |
500 liquid state configurations were generated as described in the |
35 |
+ |
Methods section using the SPC/E model of water.\cite{Berendsen87} The |
36 |
+ |
results for the energy gap comparisons and the force and torque vector |
37 |
+ |
magnitude comparisons are shown in table \ref{tab:spce}. The force |
38 |
+ |
and torque vector directionality results are displayed separately in |
39 |
+ |
table \ref{tab:spceAng}, where the effect of group-based cutoffs and |
40 |
+ |
switching functions on the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} potentials are |
41 |
+ |
investigated. |
42 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
43 |
|
\centering |
44 |
< |
\caption{Regression results for the liquid water system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
44 |
> |
\caption{Regression results for the liquid water system. Tabulated |
45 |
> |
results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force vector magnitudes |
46 |
> |
(middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure |
47 |
> |
Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group |
48 |
> |
Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx |
49 |
> |
\infty$).} |
50 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
51 |
|
\\ |
52 |
|
\toprule |
66 |
|
& 0.2 & 0.992 & 0.989 & 1.001 & 0.995 & 0.994 & 0.996 \\ |
67 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.984 & 0.980 & 0.996 & 0.985 & 0.982 & 0.987 \\ |
68 |
|
GSC & & 0.918 & 0.862 & 0.852 & 0.756 & 0.801 & 0.700 \\ |
69 |
< |
RF & & 0.971 & 0.958 & 0.975 & 0.987 & 0.959 & 0.983 \\ |
53 |
< |
|
69 |
> |
RF & & 0.971 & 0.958 & 0.975 & 0.987 & 0.959 & 0.983 \\ |
70 |
|
\midrule |
55 |
– |
|
71 |
|
PC & & -1.647 & 0.000 & -0.127 & 0.000 & -0.979 & 0.000 \\ |
72 |
|
SP & 0.0 & 0.735 & 0.368 & 0.813 & 0.537 & 0.865 & 0.659 \\ |
73 |
|
& 0.1 & 0.850 & 0.612 & 0.956 & 0.887 & 0.992 & 0.979 \\ |
79 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.996 & 0.998 & 0.997 & 0.998 & 0.996 & 0.998 \\ |
80 |
|
GSC & & 0.998 & 0.995 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 \\ |
81 |
|
RF & & 0.999 & 0.995 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 \\ |
67 |
– |
|
82 |
|
\midrule |
69 |
– |
|
83 |
|
PC & & 2.387 & 0.000 & 0.183 & 0.000 & 1.282 & 0.000 \\ |
84 |
|
SP & 0.0 & 0.847 & 0.543 & 0.904 & 0.694 & 0.935 & 0.786 \\ |
85 |
|
& 0.1 & 0.922 & 0.749 & 0.980 & 0.934 & 0.996 & 0.988 \\ |
93 |
|
RF & & 0.993 & 0.989 & 0.998 & 0.996 & 1.000 & 0.999 \\ |
94 |
|
\bottomrule |
95 |
|
\end{tabular} |
96 |
< |
\label{spceTabTMag} |
96 |
> |
\label{tab:spce} |
97 |
|
\end{table} |
98 |
|
|
99 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
100 |
|
\centering |
101 |
< |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular distributions of the force and torque vectors in the liquid water system. PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$), GSSP = Group Switched Shifted Potential, and GSSF = Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
101 |
> |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular |
102 |
> |
distributions of the force and torque vectors in the liquid water |
103 |
> |
system. PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, |
104 |
> |
GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon |
105 |
> |
\approx \infty$), GSSP = Group Switched Shifted Potential, and GSSF = |
106 |
> |
Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
107 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
108 |
|
\\ |
109 |
|
\toprule |
134 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.728 & 0.694 & 0.692 & 7.410 & 6.942 & 6.748 \\ |
135 |
|
\bottomrule |
136 |
|
\end{tabular} |
137 |
< |
\label{spceTabAng} |
137 |
> |
\label{tab:spceAng} |
138 |
|
\end{table} |
139 |
|
|
140 |
< |
\section{\label{app-ice}Solid Water: Ice I$_\textrm{c}$} |
140 |
> |
For the most parts, the water results appear to parallel the combined |
141 |
> |
results seen in the discussion in the main paper. There is good |
142 |
> |
agreement with SPME in both energetic and dynamic behavior when using |
143 |
> |
the {\sc sf} method with and without damping. The {\sc sp} method does |
144 |
> |
well with an $\alpha$ around 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$, particularly with cutoff |
145 |
> |
radii greater than 12 \AA. The results for both of these methods also |
146 |
> |
begin to decay as damping gets too large. |
147 |
|
|
148 |
+ |
The pure cutoff (PC) method performs poorly, as seen in the main |
149 |
+ |
discussion section. In contrast to the combined values, however, the |
150 |
+ |
use of a switching function and group based cutoffs really improves |
151 |
+ |
the results for these neutral water molecules. The group switched |
152 |
+ |
cutoff (GSC) shows mimics the energetics of SPME more poorly than the |
153 |
+ |
{\sc sp} (with moderate damping) and {\sc sf} methods, but the |
154 |
+ |
dynamics are quite good. The switching functions corrects |
155 |
+ |
discontinuities in the potential and forces, leading to the improved |
156 |
+ |
results. Such improvements with the use of a switching function has |
157 |
+ |
been recognized in previous studies,\cite{Andrea83,Steinbach94} and it |
158 |
+ |
is a useful tactic for stably incorporating local area electrostatic |
159 |
+ |
effects. |
160 |
+ |
|
161 |
+ |
The reaction field (RF) method simply extends the results observed in |
162 |
+ |
the GSC case. Both methods are similar in form (i.e. neutral groups, |
163 |
+ |
switching function), but RF incorporates an added effect from the |
164 |
+ |
external dielectric. This similarity translates into the same good |
165 |
+ |
dynamic results and improved energetic results. These still fall |
166 |
+ |
short of the moderately damped {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods, but they |
167 |
+ |
display how incorporating some implicit properties of the surroundings |
168 |
+ |
(i.e. $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$) can improve results. |
169 |
+ |
|
170 |
+ |
A final note for the liquid water system, use of group cutoffs and a |
171 |
+ |
switching function also leads to noticeable improvements in the {\sc |
172 |
+ |
sp} and {\sc sf} methods, primarily in directionality of the force and |
173 |
+ |
torque vectors (table \ref{tab:spceAng}). {\sc sp} shows significant |
174 |
+ |
narrowing of the angle distribution in the cases with little to no |
175 |
+ |
damping and only modest improvement for the ideal conditions ($\alpha$ |
176 |
+ |
= 0.2 \AA${-1}$ and $R_\textrm{c} \geqslant 12$~\AA). The {\sc sf} |
177 |
+ |
method simply shows modest narrowing across all damping and cutoff |
178 |
+ |
ranges of interest. Group cutoffs and the switching function do |
179 |
+ |
nothing for cases were error is introduced by overdamping the |
180 |
+ |
potentials. |
181 |
+ |
|
182 |
+ |
\section{\label{app:ice}Solid Water: Ice I$_\textrm{c}$} |
183 |
+ |
|
184 |
+ |
In addition to the disordered molecular system above, the ordered |
185 |
+ |
molecular system of ice I$_\textrm{c}$ was also considered. The |
186 |
+ |
results for the energy gap comparisons and the force and torque vector |
187 |
+ |
magnitude comparisons are shown in table \ref{tab:ice}. The force and |
188 |
+ |
torque vector directionality results are displayed separately in table |
189 |
+ |
\ref{tab:iceAng}, where the effect of group-based cutoffs and |
190 |
+ |
switching functions on the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} potentials are |
191 |
+ |
investigated. |
192 |
+ |
|
193 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
194 |
|
\centering |
195 |
< |
\caption{Regression results for the ice I$_\textrm{c}$ system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
195 |
> |
\caption{Regression results for the ice I$_\textrm{c}$ |
196 |
> |
system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force |
197 |
> |
vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom |
198 |
> |
set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, |
199 |
> |
GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where |
200 |
> |
$\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
201 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
202 |
|
\\ |
203 |
|
\toprule |
244 |
|
RF & & 0.994 & 0.997 & 0.997 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 \\ |
245 |
|
\bottomrule |
246 |
|
\end{tabular} |
247 |
< |
\label{iceTab} |
247 |
> |
\label{tab:ice} |
248 |
|
\end{table} |
249 |
|
|
250 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
280 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.251 & 0.251 & 0.259 & 2.387 & 2.395 & 2.328 \\ |
281 |
|
\bottomrule |
282 |
|
\end{tabular} |
283 |
< |
\label{iceTabAng} |
283 |
> |
\label{tab:iceAng} |
284 |
|
\end{table} |
285 |
|
|
286 |
< |
\section{\label{app-melt}NaCl Melt} |
286 |
> |
Highly ordered systems are a difficult test for the pairwise systems |
287 |
> |
in that they lack the periodicity inherent to the Ewald summation. As |
288 |
> |
expected, the energy gap agreement with SPME reduces for the {\sc sp} |
289 |
> |
and {\sc sf} with parameters that were perfectly acceptable for the |
290 |
> |
disordered liquid system. Moving to higher $R_\textrm{c}$ remedies |
291 |
> |
this degraded performance, though at increase in computational cost. |
292 |
> |
However, the dynamics of this crystalline system (both in magnitude |
293 |
> |
and direction) are little affected. Both methods still reproduce the |
294 |
> |
Ewald behavior with the same parameter recommendations from the |
295 |
> |
previous section. |
296 |
|
|
297 |
+ |
It is also worth noting that RF exhibits a slightly improved energy |
298 |
+ |
gap results over the liquid water system. One possible explanation is |
299 |
+ |
that the ice I$_\textrm{c}$ crystal is ordered such that the net |
300 |
+ |
dipole moment of the crystal is zero. With $\epsilon_\textrm{S} = |
301 |
+ |
\infty$, the reaction field incorporates this structural organization |
302 |
+ |
by actively enforcing a zeroed dipole moment within each cutoff |
303 |
+ |
sphere. |
304 |
+ |
|
305 |
+ |
\section{\label{app:melt}NaCl Melt} |
306 |
+ |
|
307 |
+ |
A high temperature NaCl melt was tested to gauge the accuracy of the |
308 |
+ |
pairwise summation methods in a highly charge disordered system. The |
309 |
+ |
results for the energy gap comparisons and the force and torque vector |
310 |
+ |
magnitude comparisons are shown in table \ref{tab:melt}. The force |
311 |
+ |
and torque vector directionality results are displayed separately in |
312 |
+ |
table \ref{tab:meltAng}, where the effect of group-based cutoffs and |
313 |
+ |
switching functions on the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} potentials are |
314 |
+ |
investigated. |
315 |
+ |
|
316 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
317 |
|
\centering |
318 |
|
\caption{Regression results for the molten NaCl system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set) and force vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, and SF = Shifted Force.} |
326 |
|
Method & $\alpha$ & slope & $R^2$ & slope & $R^2$ & slope & $R^2$ \\ |
327 |
|
\midrule |
328 |
|
PC & & -0.008 & 0.000 & -0.049 & 0.005 & -0.136 & 0.020 \\ |
329 |
< |
SP & 0.0 & 0.937 & 0.996 & 0.880 & 0.995 & 0.971 & 0.999 \\ |
330 |
< |
& 0.1 & 1.004 & 0.999 & 0.958 & 1.000 & 0.928 & 0.994 \\ |
329 |
> |
SP & 0.0 & 0.928 & 0.996 & 0.931 & 0.998 & 0.950 & 0.999 \\ |
330 |
> |
& 0.1 & 0.977 & 0.998 & 0.998 & 1.000 & 0.997 & 1.000 \\ |
331 |
|
& 0.2 & 0.960 & 1.000 & 0.813 & 0.996 & 0.811 & 0.954 \\ |
332 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.671 & 0.994 & 0.439 & 0.929 & 0.535 & 0.831 \\ |
333 |
< |
SF & 0.0 & 1.001 & 1.000 & 0.949 & 1.000 & 1.008 & 1.000 \\ |
334 |
< |
& 0.1 & 1.025 & 1.000 & 0.960 & 1.000 & 0.929 & 0.994 \\ |
333 |
> |
SF & 0.0 & 0.996 & 1.000 & 0.995 & 1.000 & 0.997 & 1.000 \\ |
334 |
> |
& 0.1 & 1.021 & 1.000 & 1.024 & 1.000 & 1.007 & 1.000 \\ |
335 |
|
& 0.2 & 0.966 & 1.000 & 0.813 & 0.996 & 0.811 & 0.954 \\ |
336 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.671 & 0.994 & 0.439 & 0.929 & 0.535 & 0.831 \\ |
337 |
|
\midrule |
338 |
|
PC & & 1.103 & 0.000 & 0.989 & 0.000 & 0.802 & 0.000 \\ |
339 |
< |
SP & 0.0 & 0.976 & 0.983 & 1.001 & 0.991 & 0.985 & 0.995 \\ |
340 |
< |
& 0.1 & 0.996 & 0.997 & 0.997 & 0.998 & 0.996 & 0.996 \\ |
339 |
> |
SP & 0.0 & 0.973 & 0.981 & 0.975 & 0.988 & 0.979 & 0.992 \\ |
340 |
> |
& 0.1 & 0.987 & 0.992 & 0.993 & 0.998 & 0.997 & 0.999 \\ |
341 |
|
& 0.2 & 0.993 & 0.996 & 0.985 & 0.988 & 0.986 & 0.981 \\ |
342 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.956 & 0.956 & 0.940 & 0.912 & 0.948 & 0.929 \\ |
343 |
< |
SF & 0.0 & 0.997 & 0.998 & 0.995 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 1.000 \\ |
344 |
< |
& 0.1 & 1.001 & 0.997 & 0.997 & 0.999 & 0.996 & 0.996 \\ |
343 |
> |
SF & 0.0 & 0.996 & 0.997 & 0.997 & 0.999 & 0.998 & 1.000 \\ |
344 |
> |
& 0.1 & 1.000 & 0.997 & 1.001 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 \\ |
345 |
|
& 0.2 & 0.994 & 0.996 & 0.985 & 0.988 & 0.986 & 0.981 \\ |
346 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.956 & 0.956 & 0.940 & 0.912 & 0.948 & 0.929 \\ |
347 |
|
\bottomrule |
348 |
|
\end{tabular} |
349 |
< |
\label{meltTab} |
349 |
> |
\label{tab:melt} |
350 |
|
\end{table} |
351 |
|
|
352 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
371 |
|
& 0.3 & 23.734 & 67.305 & 57.252 \\ |
372 |
|
\bottomrule |
373 |
|
\end{tabular} |
374 |
< |
\label{meltTabAng} |
374 |
> |
\label{tab:meltAng} |
375 |
|
\end{table} |
376 |
|
|
377 |
< |
\section{\label{app-salt}NaCl Crystal} |
377 |
> |
The molten NaCl system shows more sensitivity to the electrostatic |
378 |
> |
damping than the water systems. The most noticeable point is that the |
379 |
> |
undamped {\sc sf} method does very well at replicating the {\sc spme} |
380 |
> |
configurational energy differences and forces. Light damping appears |
381 |
> |
to minimally improve the dynamics, but this comes with a deterioration |
382 |
> |
of the energy gap results. In contrast, this light damping improves |
383 |
> |
the {\sc sp} energy gaps and forces. Moderate and heavy electrostatic |
384 |
> |
damping reduce the agreement with {\sc spme} for both methods. From |
385 |
> |
these observations, the undamped {\sc sf} method is the best choice |
386 |
> |
for disordered systems of charges. |
387 |
|
|
388 |
+ |
\section{\label{app:salt}NaCl Crystal} |
389 |
+ |
|
390 |
+ |
A 1000K NaCl crystal was used to investigate the accuracy of the |
391 |
+ |
pairwise summation methods in an ordered system of charged |
392 |
+ |
particles. The results for the energy gap comparisons and the force |
393 |
+ |
and torque vector magnitude comparisons are shown in table |
394 |
+ |
\ref{tab:salt}. The force and torque vector directionality results |
395 |
+ |
are displayed separately in table \ref{tab:saltAng}, where the effect |
396 |
+ |
of group-based cutoffs and switching functions on the {\sc sp} and |
397 |
+ |
{\sc sf} potentials are investigated. |
398 |
+ |
|
399 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
400 |
|
\centering |
401 |
< |
\caption{Regression results for the crystalline NaCl system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set) and force vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, and SF = Shifted Force.} |
401 |
> |
\caption{Regression results for the crystalline NaCl |
402 |
> |
system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set) and |
403 |
> |
force vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted |
404 |
> |
Potential, and SF = Shifted Force.} |
405 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
406 |
|
\\ |
407 |
|
\toprule |
432 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.950 & 0.952 & 0.950 & 0.953 & 0.950 & 0.953 \\ |
433 |
|
\bottomrule |
434 |
|
\end{tabular} |
435 |
< |
\label{saltTab} |
435 |
> |
\label{tab:salt} |
436 |
|
\end{table} |
437 |
|
|
438 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
439 |
|
\centering |
440 |
< |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular distributions of the force vectors in the crystalline NaCl system. PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
440 |
> |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular |
441 |
> |
distributions of the force vectors in the crystalline NaCl system. PC |
442 |
> |
= Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group |
443 |
> |
Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx |
444 |
> |
\infty$).} |
445 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
446 |
|
\\ |
447 |
|
\toprule |
461 |
|
& 0.3 & 31.120 & 31.105 & 31.029 \\ |
462 |
|
\bottomrule |
463 |
|
\end{tabular} |
464 |
< |
\label{saltTabAng} |
464 |
> |
\label{tab:saltAng} |
465 |
|
\end{table} |
466 |
|
|
467 |
< |
\section{\label{app-sol1}Weak NaCl Solution} |
467 |
> |
The crystalline NaCl system is the most challenging test case for the |
468 |
> |
pairwise summation methods, as evidenced by the results in tables |
469 |
> |
\ref{tab:salt} and \ref{tab:saltAng}. The undamped and weakly damped |
470 |
> |
{\sc sf} methods with a 12 \AA\ cutoff radius seem to be the best |
471 |
> |
choices. These methods match well with {\sc spme} across the energy |
472 |
> |
gap, force magnitude, and force directionality tests. The {\sc sp} |
473 |
> |
method struggles in all cases with the exception of good dynamics |
474 |
> |
reproduction when using weak electrostatic damping with a large cutoff |
475 |
> |
radius. |
476 |
|
|
477 |
+ |
The moderate electrostatic damping case is not as good as we would |
478 |
+ |
expect given the good long-time dynamics results observed for this |
479 |
+ |
system. Since these results are a test of instantaneous dynamics, this |
480 |
+ |
indicates that good long-time dynamics comes in part at the expense of |
481 |
+ |
short-time dynamics. Further indication of this comes from the full |
482 |
+ |
power spectra shown in the main text. It appears as though a |
483 |
+ |
distortion is introduced between 200 to 300 cm$^{-1}$ with increased |
484 |
+ |
$\alpha$. |
485 |
+ |
|
486 |
+ |
\section{\label{app:solnWeak}Weak NaCl Solution} |
487 |
+ |
|
488 |
+ |
In an effort to bridge the charged atomic and neutral molecular |
489 |
+ |
systems, Na$^+$ and Cl$^-$ ion charge defects were incorporated into |
490 |
+ |
the liquid water system. This low ionic strength system consists of 4 |
491 |
+ |
ions in the 1000 SPC/E water solvent ($\approx$0.11 M). The results |
492 |
+ |
for the energy gap comparisons and the force and torque vector |
493 |
+ |
magnitude comparisons are shown in table \ref{tab:solnWeak}. The |
494 |
+ |
force and torque vector directionality results are displayed |
495 |
+ |
separately in table \ref{tab:solnWeakAng}, where the effect of |
496 |
+ |
group-based cutoffs and switching functions on the {\sc sp} and {\sc |
497 |
+ |
sf} potentials are investigated. |
498 |
+ |
|
499 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
500 |
|
\centering |
501 |
< |
\caption{Regression results for the weak NaCl solution system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$), GSSP = Group Switched Shifted Potential, and GSSF = Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
501 |
> |
\caption{Regression results for the weak NaCl solution |
502 |
> |
system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force |
503 |
> |
vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom |
504 |
> |
set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, |
505 |
> |
GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon |
506 |
> |
\approx \infty$), GSSP = Group Switched Shifted Potential, and GSSF = |
507 |
> |
Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
508 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
509 |
|
\\ |
510 |
|
\toprule |
551 |
|
RF & & 0.984 & 0.975 & 0.996 & 0.995 & 0.998 & 0.998 \\ |
552 |
|
\bottomrule |
553 |
|
\end{tabular} |
554 |
< |
\label{sol1Tab} |
554 |
> |
\label{tab:solnWeak} |
555 |
|
\end{table} |
556 |
|
|
557 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
558 |
|
\centering |
559 |
< |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular distributions of the force and torque vectors in the weak NaCl solution system. PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$), GSSP = Group Switched Shifted Potential, and GSSF = Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
559 |
> |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular |
560 |
> |
distributions of the force and torque vectors in the weak NaCl |
561 |
> |
solution system. PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = |
562 |
> |
Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = Reaction Field (where |
563 |
> |
$\varepsilon \approx \infty$), GSSP = Group Switched Shifted |
564 |
> |
Potential, and GSSF = Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
565 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
566 |
|
\\ |
567 |
|
\toprule |
592 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.954 & 0.759 & 0.780 & 12.337 & 7.684 & 7.849 \\ |
593 |
|
\bottomrule |
594 |
|
\end{tabular} |
595 |
< |
\label{sol1TabAng} |
595 |
> |
\label{tab:solnWeakAng} |
596 |
|
\end{table} |
597 |
|
|
598 |
< |
\section{\label{app-sol10}Strong NaCl Solution} |
598 |
> |
This weak ionic strength system can be considered as a perturbation of |
599 |
> |
the pure liquid water system. The {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods are |
600 |
> |
not significantly affected by the inclusion of a few ions. The aspect |
601 |
> |
of cutoff sphere neutralization aids in the smooth incorporation of |
602 |
> |
these ions; thus, all of the observations regarding these methods |
603 |
> |
carry over from section \ref{app:water}. The differences between these |
604 |
> |
systems are visible for the {\sc rf} method. Though good force |
605 |
> |
reproduction is still maintained, the energy gaps show a significant |
606 |
> |
increase in the data scatter. This foreshadows the breakdown of the |
607 |
> |
method as we introduce system inhomogeneities. |
608 |
|
|
609 |
+ |
\section{\label{app:solnStr}Strong NaCl Solution} |
610 |
+ |
|
611 |
+ |
The bridging of the charged atomic and neutral molecular systems was |
612 |
+ |
further developed by considering a high ionic strength system |
613 |
+ |
consisting of 40 ions in the 1000 SPC/E water solvent ($\approx$1.1 |
614 |
+ |
M). The results for the energy gap comparisons and the force and |
615 |
+ |
torque vector magnitude comparisons are shown in table |
616 |
+ |
\ref{tab:solnWeak}. The force and torque vector directionality |
617 |
+ |
results are displayed separately in table\ref{tab:solnWeakAng}, where |
618 |
+ |
the effect of group-based cutoffs and switching functions on the {\sc |
619 |
+ |
sp} and {\sc sf} potentials are investigated. |
620 |
+ |
|
621 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
622 |
|
\centering |
623 |
< |
\caption{Regression results for the strong NaCl solution system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
623 |
> |
\caption{Regression results for the strong NaCl solution |
624 |
> |
system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force |
625 |
> |
vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom |
626 |
> |
set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, |
627 |
> |
GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where |
628 |
> |
$\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
629 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
630 |
|
\\ |
631 |
|
\toprule |
672 |
|
RF & & 0.949 & 0.939 & 0.988 & 0.988 & 0.992 & 0.993 \\ |
673 |
|
\bottomrule |
674 |
|
\end{tabular} |
675 |
< |
\label{sol10Tab} |
675 |
> |
\label{tab:solnStr} |
676 |
|
\end{table} |
677 |
|
|
678 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
708 |
|
& 0.3 & 1.752 & 1.454 & 1.451 & 23.587 & 14.390 & 14.245 \\ |
709 |
|
\bottomrule |
710 |
|
\end{tabular} |
711 |
< |
\label{sol10TabAng} |
711 |
> |
\label{tab:solnStrAng} |
712 |
|
\end{table} |
713 |
|
|
714 |
< |
\section{\label{app-argon}Argon Sphere in Water} |
714 |
> |
The {\sc rf} method struggles with the jump in ionic strength. The |
715 |
> |
configuration energy difference degrade to unuseable levels while the |
716 |
> |
forces and torques degrade in a more modest fashion. The {\sc rf} |
717 |
> |
method was designed for homogeneous systems, and this restriction is |
718 |
> |
apparent in these results. |
719 |
|
|
720 |
+ |
The {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods require larger cutoffs to maintain |
721 |
+ |
their agreement with {\sc spme}. With these results, we still |
722 |
+ |
recommend no to moderate damping for the {\sc sf} method and moderate |
723 |
+ |
damping for the {\sc sp} method, both with cutoffs greater than 12 |
724 |
+ |
\AA. |
725 |
+ |
|
726 |
+ |
\section{\label{app:argon}Argon Sphere in Water} |
727 |
+ |
|
728 |
+ |
The final model system studied was 6 \AA\ sphere of Argon solvated by |
729 |
+ |
SPC/E water. The results for the energy gap comparisons and the force |
730 |
+ |
and torque vector magnitude comparisons are shown in table |
731 |
+ |
\ref{tab:solnWeak}. The force and torque vector directionality |
732 |
+ |
results are displayed separately in table \ref{tab:solnWeakAng}, where |
733 |
+ |
the effect of group-based cutoffs and switching functions on the {\sc |
734 |
+ |
sp} and {\sc sf} potentials are investigated. |
735 |
+ |
|
736 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
737 |
|
\centering |
738 |
< |
\caption{Regression results for the 6 \AA\ argon sphere in liquid water system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), force vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes (bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
738 |
> |
\caption{Regression results for the 6 \AA\ argon sphere in liquid |
739 |
> |
water system. Tabulated results include $\Delta E$ values (top set), |
740 |
> |
force vector magnitudes (middle set) and torque vector magnitudes |
741 |
> |
(bottom set). PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted |
742 |
> |
Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, and RF = Reaction Field (where |
743 |
> |
$\varepsilon \approx \infty$).} |
744 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
745 |
|
\\ |
746 |
|
\toprule |
787 |
|
RF & & 0.993 & 0.988 & 0.997 & 0.995 & 0.999 & 0.998 \\ |
788 |
|
\bottomrule |
789 |
|
\end{tabular} |
790 |
< |
\label{argonTab} |
790 |
> |
\label{tab:argon} |
791 |
|
\end{table} |
792 |
|
|
793 |
|
\begin{table}[htbp] |
794 |
|
\centering |
795 |
< |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular distributions of the force and torque vectors in the 6 \AA\ sphere of argon in liquid water system. PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$), GSSP = Group Switched Shifted Potential, and GSSF = Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
795 |
> |
\caption{Variance results from Gaussian fits to angular |
796 |
> |
distributions of the force and torque vectors in the 6 \AA\ sphere of |
797 |
> |
argon in liquid water system. PC = Pure Cutoff, SP = Shifted |
798 |
> |
Potential, SF = Shifted Force, GSC = Group Switched Cutoff, RF = |
799 |
> |
Reaction Field (where $\varepsilon \approx \infty$), GSSP = Group |
800 |
> |
Switched Shifted Potential, and GSSF = Group Switched Shifted Force.} |
801 |
|
\begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrr @{}} |
802 |
|
\\ |
803 |
|
\toprule |
828 |
|
& 0.3 & 0.814 & 0.825 & 0.816 & 8.325 & 8.447 & 8.132 \\ |
829 |
|
\bottomrule |
830 |
|
\end{tabular} |
831 |
< |
\label{argonTabAng} |
831 |
> |
\label{tab:argonAng} |
832 |
|
\end{table} |
833 |
|
|
834 |
< |
\end{document} |
834 |
> |
This system appears not to show in any significant deviation in the previously observed results. The {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods give result qualities similar to those observed in section \ref{app:water}. The only significant difference is the improvement for the configuration energy differences for the {\sc rf} method. This is surprising in that we are introducing an inhomogeneity to the system; however, this inhomogeneity is charge-neutral and does not result in charged cutoff spheres. The charge-neutrality, which the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods explicity enforce, seems to play a greater role in the stability of the {\sc rf} method than the necessity of a homogeneous environment. |
835 |
> |
|
836 |
> |
\newpage |
837 |
> |
|
838 |
> |
\bibliographystyle{jcp2} |
839 |
> |
\bibliography{electrostaticMethods} |
840 |
> |
|
841 |
> |
\end{document} |