ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2638 by chrisfen, Sun Mar 19 19:34:53 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2639 by chrisfen, Mon Mar 20 02:00:26 2006 UTC

# Line 77 | Line 77 | accurately incorporate their effect, and since the com
77   leading to an effect excluded from the pair interactions within a unit
78   box.  In large systems, excessively large cutoffs need to be used to
79   accurately incorporate their effect, and since the computational cost
80 < increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes an
81 < impractical task to perform these calculations.
80 > increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes
81 > very time-consuming to perform these calculations.
82  
83 + There have been many efforts to address this issue of both proper and
84 + practical handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have
85 + resulted in the availability of a variety of
86 + techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are typically
87 + classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics, static
88 + dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods (i.e.,
89 + Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
90 + trucation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
91 + reaction field type methods, fast multipole
92 + methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
93 + often preferred because they incorporate dynamic solvent molecules in
94 + the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult to
95 + utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
96 + addition to this cost, there has been some question of the inherent
97 + periodicity of the explicit Ewald summation artificially influencing
98 + systems dynamics.\cite{Tobias01}
99 +
100 + In this paper, we focus on the common mixed and explicit methods of
101 + reaction filed and smooth particle mesh
102 + Ewald\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} and a new set of shifted methods
103 + devised by Wolf {\it et al.} which we further extend.\cite{Wolf99}
104 + These new methods for handling electrostatics are quite
105 + computationally efficient, since they involve only a simple
106 + modification to the direct pairwise sum, and they lack the added
107 + periodicity of the Ewald sum. Below, these methods are evaluated using
108 + a variety of model systems and comparison methodologies to establish
109 + their useability in molecular simulations.
110 +
111   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
112 < The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the periodic replicas,
112 > The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with
113 > periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the
114 > effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the
115 > periodic replicas,
116   \begin{equation}
117   V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
118   \label{eq:PBCSum}
119   \end{equation}
120 < where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box replicas
121 < with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the prime indicates
122 < $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} = 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the
123 < sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is
124 < $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are
125 < the Euler angles for $i$ and $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation
126 < ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge
127 < interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
128 < eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is discontiuous
129 < for non-neutral systems.
120 > where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box
121 > replicas with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the
122 > prime indicates $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} =
123 > 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic
124 > particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is
125 > the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler angles for $i$ and
126 > $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i
127 > q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge interactions). In the
128 > case of monopole electrostatics, eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is
129 > conditionally convergent and is discontiuous for non-neutral systems.
130  
131   This electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
132   for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
# Line 542 | Line 573 | between those computed from the particular method and
573   investigated through measurement of the angle ($\theta$) formed
574   between those computed from the particular method and those from SPME,
575   \begin{equation}
576 < \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method},
576 > \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method}\right),
577   \end{equation}
578   where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the
579   force vector computed using method $M$.  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines