ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2639 by chrisfen, Mon Mar 20 02:00:26 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2640 by chrisfen, Mon Mar 20 13:31:52 2006 UTC

# Line 87 | Line 87 | trucation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of
87   classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics, static
88   dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods (i.e.,
89   Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
90 < trucation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
90 > truncation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
91   reaction field type methods, fast multipole
92   methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
93   often preferred because they incorporate dynamic solvent molecules in
# Line 106 | Line 106 | their useability in molecular simulations.
106   modification to the direct pairwise sum, and they lack the added
107   periodicity of the Ewald sum. Below, these methods are evaluated using
108   a variety of model systems and comparison methodologies to establish
109 < their useability in molecular simulations.
109 > their usability in molecular simulations.
110  
111   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
112   The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with
# Line 126 | Line 126 | conditionally convergent and is discontiuous for non-n
126   $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i
127   q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge interactions). In the
128   case of monopole electrostatics, eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is
129 < conditionally convergent and is discontiuous for non-neutral systems.
129 > conditionally convergent and is discontinuous for non-neutral systems.
130  
131   This electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
132   for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
# Line 176 | Line 176 | $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calcualtion (with the other being
176   direct and reciprocal-space portions of the summation.  The choice of
177   the magnitude of this value allows one to select whether the
178   real-space or reciprocal space portion of the summation is an
179 < $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calcualtion (with the other being
179 > $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calculation (with the other being
180   $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With appropriate choice of $\alpha$
181   and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be brought down to
182   $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route taken to
# Line 212 | Line 212 | perodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
212   artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
213   Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care ought to be taken when
214   considering the use of the Ewald summation where the intrinsic
215 < perodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
215 > periodicity may negatively affect the system dynamics.
216  
217  
218   \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
# Line 230 | Line 230 | V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(
230   and a distance-dependent damping function (identical to that seen in
231   the real-space portion of the Ewald sum) to aid convergence
232   \begin{equation}
233 < V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
233 > V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
234   \label{eq:WolfPot}
235   \end{equation}
236   Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) is essentially the common form of a shifted
# Line 738 | Line 738 | seen in the Shifted-Potental rows.  While the undamped
738   Correcting the resulting charged cutoff sphere is one of the purposes
739   of the damped Coulomb summation proposed by Wolf \textit{et
740   al.},\cite{Wolf99} and this correction indeed improves the results as
741 < seen in the Shifted-Potental rows.  While the undamped case of this
741 > seen in the {\sc sp} rows.  While the undamped case of this
742   method is a significant improvement over the pure cutoff, it still
743   doesn't correlate that well with SPME.  Inclusion of potential damping
744   improves the results, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$ shows
# Line 951 | Line 951 | collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} p
951   increased, these peaks are smoothed out, and approach the SPME
952   curve. The damping acts as a distance dependent Gaussian screening of
953   the point charges for the pairwise summation methods; thus, the
954 < collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potental, and the
954 > collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potential, and the
955   stiffness of the potential is diminished as the electrostatic
956   interactions are softened by the damping function.  With $\alpha$
957   values of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$, the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} functions are

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines