ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2624 by gezelter, Wed Mar 15 17:09:09 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2636 by chrisfen, Sat Mar 18 05:31:17 2006 UTC

# Line 2 | Line 2
2   %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint]{revtex4}
3   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
4   \usepackage{endfloat}
5 < \usepackage{amsmath}
5 > \usepackage{amsmath,bm}
6   \usepackage{amssymb}
7   \usepackage{epsf}
8   \usepackage{times}
# Line 81 | Line 81 | impractical task to perform these calculations.
81   impractical task to perform these calculations.
82  
83   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
84 < blah blah blah Ewald Sum Important blah blah blah
84 > The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the effect of all charges within a simulation box, as well as those in the periodic replicas,
85 > \begin{equation}
86 > V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
87 > \label{eq:PBCSum}
88 > \end{equation}
89 > where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box replicas
90 > with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the prime indicates
91 > $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} = 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the
92 > sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is
93 > $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are
94 > the Euler angles for $i$ and $j$, and $\phi$ is Poisson's equation
95 > ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for charge-charge
96 > interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
97 > eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is discontiuous
98 > for non-neutral systems.
99  
100 + This electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
101 + for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
102 + took was to convert this conditionally convergent sum into two
103 + absolutely convergent summations: a short-ranged real-space summation
104 + and a long-ranged reciprocal-space summation,
105 + \begin{equation}
106 + \begin{split}
107 + V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}& \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \Biggr[ q_i q_j\Biggr( {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left( \alpha|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|\right)}{|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|} \\ &+ \frac{1}{\pi L^3}\sum_{\mathbf{k}\ne 0}\frac{4\pi^2}{|\mathbf{k}|^2} \exp{\left(-\frac{\pi^2|\mathbf{k}|^2}{\alpha^2}\right) \cos\left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}_{ij}\right)}\Biggr)\Biggr] \\ &- \frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\sum_{i=1}^N q_i^2 + \frac{2\pi}{3L^3}\left|\sum_{i=1}^N q_i\mathbf{r}_i\right|^2,
108 + \end{split}
109 + \label{eq:EwaldSum}
110 + \end{equation}
111 + where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter, or separation constant, with
112 + units of \AA$^{-1}$, and $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and
113 + equal $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$. The final two terms of
114 + eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
115 + for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
116 + dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
117 + simulations,\cite{Brush66,Woodcock71} until it was introduced by de
118 + Leeuw {\it et al.} to address situations where the unit cell has a
119 + dipole moment and this dipole moment gets magnified through
120 + replication of the periodic images.\cite{deLeeuw80} This term is zero
121 + for systems where $\epsilon_{\rm S} = \infty$. Figure
122 + \ref{fig:ewaldTime} shows how the Ewald sum has been applied over
123 + time.  Initially, due to the small size of systems, the entire
124 + simulation box was replicated to convergence.  Currently, we balance a
125 + spherical real-space cutoff with the reciprocal sum and consider the
126 + surrounding dielectric.
127   \begin{figure}
128   \centering
129   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./ewaldProgression.pdf}
# Line 96 | Line 137 | a surrounding dielectric term is included.}
137   \label{fig:ewaldTime}
138   \end{figure}
139  
140 + The Ewald summation in the straight-forward form is an
141 + $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The separation constant $(\alpha)$
142 + plays an important role in the computational cost balance between the
143 + direct and reciprocal-space portions of the summation.  The choice of
144 + the magnitude of this value allows one to whether the real-space or
145 + reciprocal space portion of the summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$
146 + calcualtion, with the other being $\mathscr{O}(N)$.\cite{Sagui99} With
147 + appropriate choice of $\alpha$ and thoughtful algorithm development,
148 + this cost can be brought down to
149 + $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route taken to
150 + accelerate the Ewald summation is to se
151 +
152   \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
153   In a recent paper by Wolf \textit{et al.}, a procedure was outlined
154   for the accurate accumulation of electrostatic interactions in an
# Line 126 | Line 179 | procedure gives an expression for the forces,
179   derivative of this potential prior to evaluation of the limit.  This
180   procedure gives an expression for the forces,
181   \begin{equation}
182 < F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2)}}{r_{ij}}\right]+\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
182 > F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2\right)}}{r_{ij}}\right]-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
183   \label{eq:WolfForces}
184   \end{equation}
185   that incorporates both image charges and damping of the electrostatic
# Line 206 | Line 259 | of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cut
259   The forces associated with the shifted potential are simply the forces
260   of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cutoff sphere),
261   \begin{equation}
262 < F_{\textrm{SP}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
262 > f_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
263   \end{equation}
264   and are zero outside.  Inside the cutoff sphere, the forces associated
265   with the shifted force form can be written,
266   \begin{equation}
267 < F_{\textrm{SF}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) - \left(\frac{d
267 > f_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
268   v(r)}{dr} \right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}.
269   \end{equation}
270  
# Line 223 | Line 276 | al.}'s undamped prescription:
276   then the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) forms will give Wolf {\it et
277   al.}'s undamped prescription:
278   \begin{equation}
279 < V_\textrm{SP}(r) =
279 > v_\textrm{SP}(r) =
280   q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad
281   r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
282 < \label{eq:WolfSP}
282 > \label{eq:SPPot}
283   \end{equation}
284   with associated forces,
285   \begin{equation}
286 < F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
287 < \label{eq:FWolfSP}
286 > f_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
287 > \label{eq:SPForces}
288   \end{equation}
289   These forces are identical to the forces of the standard Coulomb
290   interaction, and cutting these off at $R_c$ was addressed by Wolf
# Line 245 | Line 298 | will give,
298   The shifted force ({\sc sf}) form using the normal Coulomb potential
299   will give,
300   \begin{equation}
301 < V_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
301 > v_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
302   \label{eq:SFPot}
303   \end{equation}
304   with associated forces,
305   \begin{equation}
306 < F_\textrm{SF}(r =  q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}+\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
306 > f_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
307   \label{eq:SFForces}
308   \end{equation}
309   This formulation has the benefits that there are no discontinuities at
# Line 264 | Line 317 | Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energeti
317   to gain functionality in dynamics simulations.
318  
319   Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energetics of the
320 < shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfSP}), and they found that
320 > shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}), and they found that
321   it was still insufficient for accurate determination of the energy
322   with reasonable cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies
323   fluctuate around the expected value with increasing cutoff radius, but
# Line 279 | Line 332 | v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
332   v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
333   \label{eq:dampCoulomb}
334   \end{equation}
335 < the shifted potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfSP}) can be recovered
336 < \textit{via} equation \ref{eq:shiftingForm},
335 > the shifted potential (Eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) can be reacquired using
336 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
337   \begin{equation}
338 < v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_\textrm{c})}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
338 > v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
339   \label{eq:DSPPot}
340 < \end{equation},
340 > \end{equation}
341   with associated forces,
342   \begin{equation}
343 < f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}-\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
343 > f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
344   \label{eq:DSPForces}
345   \end{equation}
346   Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a discontinuity and
347   a lack of the image charges in the forces.  To remedy these concerns,
348 < one may derive a Shifted-Force variant by including  the derivative
349 < term in equation \ref{eq:shiftingForm},
348 > one may derive a {\sc sf} variant by including  the derivative
349 > term in eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
350   \begin{equation}
351   \begin{split}
352   v_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
353   \label{eq:DSFPot}
354   \end{split}
355   \end{equation}
356 < The derivative of the above potential gives the following forces,
356 > The derivative of the above potential will lead to the following forces,
357   \begin{equation}
358   \begin{split}
359 < f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}})}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
359 > f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
360   \label{eq:DSFForces}
361   \end{split}
362   \end{equation}
363 + If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is chosen to be zero, the undamped
364 + case, eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot}-\ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly recovered
365 + from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot}-\ref{eq:DSFForces}).
366  
367 < This new Shifted-Force potential is similar to equation
368 < \ref{eq:ZahnPot} derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are
369 < two important differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term
370 < from eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to
371 < eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb}) with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This
372 < term is {\it not} present in the Zahn potential, resulting in a
373 < potential discontinuity as particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second,
374 < the sign of the derivative portion is different.  The missing
375 < $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not affect molecular dynamics simulations
376 < (although the computed energy would be expected to have sudden jumps
377 < as particle distances crossed $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a
378 < potential source of errors, however.  In fact, it introduces a
379 < discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff, because the force function
380 < is shifted in the wrong direction and doesn't cross zero at
325 < $R_\textrm{c}$.  
367 > This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation \ref{eq:ZahnPot}
368 > derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are two important
369 > differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term from
370 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb})
371 > with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This term is {\it not} present
372 > in the Zahn potential, resulting in a potential discontinuity as
373 > particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second, the sign of the derivative
374 > portion is different.  The missing $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not
375 > affect molecular dynamics simulations (although the computed energy
376 > would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle distances crossed
377 > $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a potential source of errors,
378 > however.  In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the
379 > cutoff, because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction
380 > and doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
381  
382   Eqs. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}) and (\ref{eq:DSFForces}) result in an
383   electrostatic summation method that is continuous in both the
# Line 333 | Line 388 | performed by the Ewald sum.
388   performed by the Ewald sum.
389  
390   \subsection{Other alternatives}
391 + In addition to the methods described above, we will consider some
392 + other techniques that commonly get used in molecular simulations.  The
393 + simplest of these is group-based cutoffs.  Though of little use for
394 + non-neutral molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
395 + advantage of the observation that the electrostatic interactions decay
396 + faster than those for monopolar pairs.\cite{Steinbach94} When
397 + considering these molecules as groups, an orientational aspect is
398 + introduced to the interactions.  Consequently, as these molecular
399 + particles move through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward
400 + due to the anisotropy of the net molecular dipole
401 + interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To maintain good energy conservation,
402 + both the potential and derivative need to be smoothly switched to zero
403 + at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79} This is accomplished using a
404 + switching function,
405 + \begin{equation}
406 + S(r) = \begin{cases} 1 &\quad r\leqslant r_\textrm{sw} \\
407 + \frac{(R_\textrm{c}+2r-3r_\textrm{sw})(R_\textrm{c}-r)^2}{(R_\textrm{c}-r_\textrm{sw})^3} &\quad r_\textrm{sw}<r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\
408 + 0 &\quad r>R_\textrm{c}
409 + \end{cases},
410 + \end{equation}
411 + where the above form is for a cubic function.  If a smooth second
412 + derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can be
413 + used.\cite{Andrea83}
414  
415 < Reaction Field blah
415 > Group-based cutoffs neglect the surroundings beyond $R_\textrm{c}$,
416 > and to incorporate their effect, a method like Reaction Field ({\sc
417 > rf}) can be used.  The original theory for {\sc rf} was originally
418 > developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was applied in
419 > simulations for the study of water by Barker and Watts.\cite{Barker73}
420 > In application, it is simply an extension of the group-based cutoff
421 > method where the net dipole within the cutoff sphere polarizes an
422 > external dielectric, which reacts back on the central dipole.  The
423 > same switching function considerations for group-based cutoffs need to
424 > made for {\sc rf}, with the additional pre-specification of a
425 > dielectric constant.
426  
339 Group-based cutoff blah
340
341
427   \section{Methods}
428  
429   In classical molecular mechanics simulations, there are two primary
# Line 521 | Line 606 | Electrostatic summation method comparisons were perfor
606  
607   \subsection{Electrostatic Summation Methods}\label{sec:ESMethods}
608   Electrostatic summation method comparisons were performed using SPME,
609 < the Shifted-Potential and Shifted-Force methods - both with damping
609 > the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods - both with damping
610   parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$ (no, weak,
611   moderate, and strong damping respectively), reaction field with an
612   infinite dielectric constant, and an unmodified cutoff.  Group-based
# Line 540 | Line 625 | tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal
625   the energies and forces calculated.  Typical molecular mechanics
626   packages default this to a value dependent on the cutoff radius and a
627   tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller
628 < tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy in the
629 < real-space portion of the summation.\cite{Essmann95} The default
630 < TINKER tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
628 > tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy, but this
629 > usually means more time spent calculating the reciprocal-space portion
630 > of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95} The default TINKER
631 > tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
632   calculations, resulting in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and
633   0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
634  
# Line 584 | Line 670 | shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations
670   particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12 \AA .  Use of a
671   larger damping parameter is more helpful for the shortest cutoff
672   shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations with larger
673 < cutoffs.  In the Shifted-Force sets, increasing damping results in
673 > cutoffs.  In the {\sc sf} sets, increasing damping results in
674   progressively poorer correlation.  Overall, the undamped case is the
675   best performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are
676   consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  This result
# Line 617 | Line 703 | a improvement much more significant than what was seen
703   in the previous $\Delta E$ section.  The unmodified cutoff results are
704   poor, but using group based cutoffs and a switching function provides
705   a improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta
706 < E$.  Looking at the Shifted-Potential sets, the slope and $R^2$
706 > E$.  Looking at the {\sc sp} sets, the slope and $R^2$
707   improve with the use of damping to an optimal result of 0.2 \AA
708   $^{-1}$ for the 12 and 15 \AA\ cutoffs.  Further increases in damping,
709   while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9 \AA\ , is
710   detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.  The undamped
711 < Shifted-Force method gives forces in line with those obtained using
711 > {\sc sf} method gives forces in line with those obtained using
712   SPME, and use of a damping function results in minor improvement.  The
713   reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor
714   quality of the fits for the $\Delta E$ results.  There is still a
# Line 645 | Line 731 | the improved behavior that comes with increasing the c
731   torque vector magnitude results in figure \ref{fig:trqMag} are still
732   similar to those seen for the forces; however, they more clearly show
733   the improved behavior that comes with increasing the cutoff radius.
734 < Moderate damping is beneficial to the Shifted-Potential and helpful
735 < yet possibly unnecessary with the Shifted-Force method, and they also
734 > Moderate damping is beneficial to the {\sc sp} and helpful
735 > yet possibly unnecessary with the {\sc sf} method, and they also
736   show that over-damping adversely effects all cutoff radii rather than
737   showing an improvement for systems with short cutoffs.  The reaction
738   field method performs well when calculating the torques, better than
# Line 675 | Line 761 | of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement
761   show the improvement afforded by choosing a longer simulation cutoff.
762   Increasing the cutoff from 9 to 12 \AA\ typically results in a halving
763   of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement going from 12
764 < to 15 \AA .  The undamped Shifted-Force, Group Based Cutoff, and
764 > to 15 \AA .  The undamped {\sc sf}, Group Based Cutoff, and
765   Reaction Field methods all do equivalently well at capturing the
766   direction of both the force and torque vectors.  Using damping
767 < improves the angular behavior significantly for the Shifted-Potential
768 < and moderately for the Shifted-Force methods.  Increasing the damping
767 > improves the angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp}
768 > and moderately for the {\sc sf} methods.  Increasing the damping
769   too far is destructive for both methods, particularly to the torque
770   vectors.  Again it is important to recognize that the force vectors
771   cover all particles in the systems, while torque vectors are only
# Line 721 | Line 807 | Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs
807   \end{table}
808  
809   Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
810 < to both the Shifted-Potential and Shifted-Force methods.  Use off a
810 > to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  Use off a
811   switching function corrects for the discontinuities that arise when
812   atoms of a group exit the cutoff before the group's center of mass.
813   Though there are no significant benefit or drawbacks observed in
# Line 730 | Line 816 | results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for compari
816   \ref{tab:groupAngle} shows the angular variance values obtained using
817   group based cutoffs and a switching function alongside the standard
818   results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for comparison purposes.
819 < The Shifted-Potential shows much narrower angular distributions for
819 > The {\sc sp} shows much narrower angular distributions for
820   both the force and torque vectors when using an $\alpha$ of 0.2
821 < \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while Shifted-Force shows improvements in the
821 > \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while {\sc sf} shows improvements in the
822   undamped and lightly damped cases.  Thus, by calculating the
823   electrostatic interactions in terms of molecular pairs rather than
824   atomic pairs, the direction of the force and torque vectors are
825   determined more accurately.
826  
827   One additional trend to recognize in table \ref{tab:groupAngle} is
828 < that the $\sigma^2$ values for both Shifted-Potential and
829 < Shifted-Force converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
828 > that the $\sigma^2$ values for both {\sc sp} and
829 > {\sc sf} converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
830   to see when using group based cutoffs.  Looking back on figures
831   \ref{fig:delE}, \ref{fig:frcMag}, and \ref{fig:trqMag}, show this
832   behavior clearly at large $\alpha$ and cutoff values.  The reason for
# Line 759 | Line 845 | up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damp
845   high would introduce error in the molecular torques, particularly for
846   the shorter cutoffs.  Based on the above findings, empirical damping
847   up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damping is arguably
848 < unnecessary when using the Shifted-Force method.
848 > unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
849  
850   \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
851  
852 < In the previous studies using a Shifted-Force variant of the damped
852 > In the previous studies using a {\sc sf} variant of the damped
853   Wolf coulomb potential, the structure and dynamics of water were
854   investigated rather extensively.\cite{Zahn02,Kast03} Their results
855 < indicated that the damped Shifted-Force method results in properties
855 > indicated that the damped {\sc sf} method results in properties
856   very similar to those obtained when using the Ewald summation.
857   Considering the statistical results shown above, the good performance
858   of this method is not that surprising.  Rather than consider the same
# Line 777 | Line 863 | summation methods from the above results.
863   \begin{figure}
864   \centering
865   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./spectraSquare.pdf}
866 < \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, Shifted-Force ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and Shifted-Potential ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
866 > \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
867   \label{fig:methodPS}
868   \end{figure}
869  
# Line 789 | Line 875 | cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are blue-shifted whe
875   methods differ.  Considering the low-frequency inset (expanded in the
876   upper frame of figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at frequencies below 100
877   cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are blue-shifted when using undamped
878 < or weakly damped Shifted-Force.  When using moderate damping ($\alpha
879 < = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the Shifted-Force and Shifted-Potential
878 > or weakly damped {\sc sf}.  When using moderate damping ($\alpha
879 > = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp}
880   methods give near identical correlated motion behavior as the Ewald
881   method (which has a damping value of 0.3119).  The damping acts as a
882   distance dependent Gaussian screening of the point charges for the
# Line 814 | Line 900 | blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resid
900   shift to higher frequency in exponential fashion.  Though not shown,
901   the spectrum for the simple undamped electrostatic potential is
902   blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resides near 325
903 < cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped Shifted-Force
903 > cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped {\sc sf}
904   method producing low-lying motion peaks within 10 cm$^{-1}$ of SPME is
905   quite respectable; however, it appears as though moderate damping is
906   required for accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
907   \begin{figure}
908   \centering
909   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./comboSquare.pdf}
910 < \caption{Upper: Zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the Shifted-Force potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  Lower: Low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
910 > \caption{Regions of spectra showing the low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K using various electrostatic summation methods.  The upper plot is a zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  The lower plot is of spectra when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
911   \label{fig:dampInc}
912   \end{figure}
913  
# Line 832 | Line 918 | Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02} In particular
918   electrostatic summation techniques than the Ewald summation, chiefly
919   methods derived from the damped Coulombic sum originally proposed by
920   Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02} In particular, the
921 < Shifted-Force method, reformulated above as equation \ref{eq:SFPot},
921 > {\sc sf} method, reformulated above as eq. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}),
922   shows a remarkable ability to reproduce the energetic and dynamic
923   characteristics exhibited by simulations employing lattice summation
924   techniques.  The cumulative energy difference results showed the
925 < undamped Shifted-Force and moderately damped Shifted-Potential methods
925 > undamped {\sc sf} and moderately damped {\sc sp} methods
926   produced results nearly identical to SPME.  Similarly for the dynamic
927 < features, the undamped or moderately damped Shifted-Force and
928 < moderately damped Shifted-Potential methods produce force and torque
927 > features, the undamped or moderately damped {\sc sf} and
928 > moderately damped {\sc sp} methods produce force and torque
929   vector magnitude and directions very similar to the expected values.
930   These results translate into long-time dynamic behavior equivalent to
931   that produced in simulations using SPME.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines