ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2629 by chrisfen, Thu Mar 16 03:48:32 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2643 by gezelter, Mon Mar 20 17:32:33 2006 UTC

# Line 2 | Line 2
2   %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint]{revtex4}
3   \documentclass[11pt]{article}
4   \usepackage{endfloat}
5 < \usepackage{amsmath}
5 > \usepackage{amsmath,bm}
6   \usepackage{amssymb}
7   \usepackage{epsf}
8   \usepackage{times}
# Line 65 | Line 65 | In molecular simulations, proper accumulation of the e
65   \section{Introduction}
66  
67   In molecular simulations, proper accumulation of the electrostatic
68 < interactions is considered one of the most essential and
69 < computationally demanding tasks.  The common molecular mechanics force
70 < fields are founded on representation of the atomic sites centered on
71 < full or partial charges shielded by Lennard-Jones type interactions.
72 < This means that nearly every pair interaction involves an
73 < charge-charge calculation.  Coupled with $r^{-1}$ decay, the monopole
74 < interactions quickly become a burden for molecular systems of all
75 < sizes.  For example, in small systems, the electrostatic pair
76 < interaction may not have decayed appreciably within the box length
77 < leading to an effect excluded from the pair interactions within a unit
78 < box.  In large systems, excessively large cutoffs need to be used to
79 < accurately incorporate their effect, and since the computational cost
80 < increases proportionally with the cutoff sphere, it quickly becomes an
81 < impractical task to perform these calculations.
68 > interactions is essential and is one of the most
69 > computationally-demanding tasks.  The common molecular mechanics force
70 > fields represent atomic sites with full or partial charges protected
71 > by Lennard-Jones (short range) interactions.  This means that nearly
72 > every pair interaction involves a calculation of charge-charge forces.
73 > Coupled with relatively long-ranged $r^{-1}$ decay, the monopole
74 > interactions quickly become the most expensive part of molecular
75 > simulations.  Historically, the electrostatic pair interaction would
76 > not have decayed appreciably within the typical box lengths that could
77 > be feasibly simulated.  In the larger systems that are more typical of
78 > modern simulations, large cutoffs should be used to incorporate
79 > electrostatics correctly.
80  
81 + There have been many efforts to address the proper and practical
82 + handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have resulted in a
83 + variety of techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are
84 + typically classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics,
85 + static dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods
86 + (i.e., Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
87 + truncation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
88 + reaction field type methods, fast multipole
89 + methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
90 + often preferred because they physically incorporate solvent molecules
91 + in the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult
92 + to utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
93 + addition to the computational cost, there have been some questions
94 + regarding possible artifacts caused by the inherent periodicity of the
95 + explicit Ewald summation.\cite{Tobias01}
96 +
97 + In this paper, we focus on a new set of shifted methods devised by
98 + Wolf {\it et al.},\cite{Wolf99} which we further extend.  These
99 + methods along with a few other mixed methods (i.e. reaction field) are
100 + compared with the smooth particle mesh Ewald
101 + sum,\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} which is our reference method for
102 + handling long-range electrostatic interactions. The new methods for
103 + handling electrostatics have the potential to scale linearly with
104 + increasing system size since they involve only a simple modification
105 + to the direct pairwise sum.  They also lack the added periodicity of
106 + the Ewald sum, so they can be used for systems which are non-periodic
107 + or which have one- or two-dimensional periodicity.  Below, these
108 + methods are evaluated using a variety of model systems to establish
109 + their usability in molecular simulations.
110 +
111   \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
112 < blah blah blah Ewald Sum Important blah blah blah
112 > The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with
113 > periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the
114 > effect of all charges within a (cubic) simulation box as well as those
115 > in the periodic replicas,
116 > \begin{equation}
117 > V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
118 > \label{eq:PBCSum}
119 > \end{equation}
120 > where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box
121 > replicas with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the
122 > prime indicates $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} =
123 > 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic
124 > particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is
125 > the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler angles for $i$ and
126 > $j$, and $\phi$ is the solution to Poisson's equation
127 > ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for
128 > charge-charge interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
129 > eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is divergent for
130 > non-neutral systems.
131  
132 + The electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
133 + for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
134 + took was to convert this conditionally convergent sum into two
135 + absolutely convergent summations: a short-ranged real-space summation
136 + and a long-ranged reciprocal-space summation,
137 + \begin{equation}
138 + \begin{split}
139 + V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}& \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \Biggr[ q_i q_j\Biggr( {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left( \alpha|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|\right)}{|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|} \\ &+ \frac{1}{\pi L^3}\sum_{\mathbf{k}\ne 0}\frac{4\pi^2}{|\mathbf{k}|^2} \exp{\left(-\frac{\pi^2|\mathbf{k}|^2}{\alpha^2}\right) \cos\left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}_{ij}\right)}\Biggr)\Biggr] \\ &- \frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\sum_{i=1}^N q_i^2 + \frac{2\pi}{(2\epsilon_\textrm{S}+1)L^3}\left|\sum_{i=1}^N q_i\mathbf{r}_i\right|^2,
140 + \end{split}
141 + \label{eq:EwaldSum}
142 + \end{equation}
143 + where $\alpha$ is a damping parameter, or separation constant, with
144 + units of \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and are
145 + equal to $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the
146 + dielectric constant of the surrounding medium. The final two terms of
147 + eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
148 + for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
149 + dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
150 + simulations,\cite{Brush66,Woodcock71} until it was introduced by de
151 + Leeuw {\it et al.} to address situations where the unit cell has a
152 + dipole moment which is magnified through replication of the periodic
153 + images.\cite{deLeeuw80,Smith81} If this term is taken to be zero, the
154 + system is said to be using conducting (or ``tin-foil'') boundary
155 + conditions, $\epsilon_{\rm S} = \infty$. Figure
156 + \ref{fig:ewaldTime} shows how the Ewald sum has been applied over
157 + time.  Initially, due to the small sizes of the systems that could be
158 + feasibly simulated, the entire simulation box was replicated to
159 + convergence.  In more modern simulations, the simulation boxes have
160 + grown large enough that a real-space cutoff could potentially give
161 + convergent behavior.  Indeed, it has often been observed that the
162 + reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald sum can be vanishingly
163 + small compared to the real-space portion.\cite{XXX}
164 +
165   \begin{figure}
166   \centering
167   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./ewaldProgression.pdf}
# Line 96 | Line 175 | a surrounding dielectric term is included.}
175   \label{fig:ewaldTime}
176   \end{figure}
177  
178 + The original Ewald summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The
179 + separation constant $(\alpha)$ plays an important role in balancing
180 + the computational cost between the direct and reciprocal-space
181 + portions of the summation.  The choice of this value allows one to
182 + select whether the real-space or reciprocal space portion of the
183 + summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calculation (with the other being
184 + $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With the appropriate choice of
185 + $\alpha$ and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be
186 + reduced to $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route
187 + taken to reduce the cost of the Ewald summation even further is to set
188 + $\alpha$ such that the real-space interactions decay rapidly, allowing
189 + for a short spherical cutoff. Then the reciprocal space summation is
190 + optimized.  These optimizations usually involve utilization of the
191 + fast Fourier transform (FFT),\cite{Hockney81} leading to the
192 + particle-particle particle-mesh (P3M) and particle mesh Ewald (PME)
193 + methods.\cite{Shimada93,Luty94,Luty95,Darden93,Essmann95} In these
194 + methods, the cost of the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald
195 + summation is reduced from $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ down to $\mathscr{O}(N
196 + \log N)$.
197 +
198 + These developments and optimizations have made the use of the Ewald
199 + summation routine in simulations with periodic boundary
200 + conditions. However, in certain systems, such as vapor-liquid
201 + interfaces and membranes, the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity
202 + can prove problematic.  The Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
203 + 2D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89}, but the
204 + new methods are computationally expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99}
205 + Inclusion of a correction term in the Ewald summation is a possible
206 + direction for handling 2D systems while still enabling the use of the
207 + modern optimizations.\cite{Yeh99}
208 +
209 + Several studies have recognized that the inherent periodicity in the
210 + Ewald sum can also have an effect on three-dimensional
211 + systems.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}
212 + Solvated proteins are essentially kept at high concentration due to
213 + the periodicity of the electrostatic summation method.  In these
214 + systems, the more compact folded states of a protein can be
215 + artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
216 + Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care must be taken when
217 + considering the use of the Ewald summation where the assumed
218 + periodicity would introduce spurious effects in the system dynamics.
219 +
220   \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
221   In a recent paper by Wolf \textit{et al.}, a procedure was outlined
222   for the accurate accumulation of electrostatic interactions in an
223 < efficient pairwise fashion.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.} observed
224 < that the electrostatic interaction is effectively short-ranged in
225 < condensed phase systems and that neutralization of the charge
226 < contained within the cutoff radius is crucial for potential
223 > efficient pairwise fashion.  This procedure lacks the inherent
224 > periodicity of the Ewald summation.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.}
225 > observed that the electrostatic interaction is effectively
226 > short-ranged in condensed phase systems and that neutralization of the
227 > charge contained within the cutoff radius is crucial for potential
228   stability. They devised a pairwise summation method that ensures
229 < charge neutrality and gives results similar to those obtained with
230 < the Ewald summation.  The resulting shifted Coulomb potential
229 > charge neutrality and gives results similar to those obtained with the
230 > Ewald summation.  The resulting shifted Coulomb potential
231   (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes image-charges subtracted out through
232   placement on the cutoff sphere and a distance-dependent damping
233   function (identical to that seen in the real-space portion of the
234   Ewald sum) to aid convergence
235   \begin{equation}
236 < V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
236 > V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
237   \label{eq:WolfPot}
238   \end{equation}
239   Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) is essentially the common form of a shifted
# Line 126 | Line 248 | procedure gives an expression for the forces,
248   derivative of this potential prior to evaluation of the limit.  This
249   procedure gives an expression for the forces,
250   \begin{equation}
251 < F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2)}}{r_{ij}}\right]+\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
251 > F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2\right)}}{r_{ij}}\right]-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
252   \label{eq:WolfForces}
253   \end{equation}
254   that incorporates both image charges and damping of the electrostatic
# Line 136 | Line 258 | the potential are not commensurate.  Attempts to use b
258   force expressions for use in simulations involving water.\cite{Zahn02}
259   In their work, they pointed out that the forces and derivative of
260   the potential are not commensurate.  Attempts to use both
261 < Eqs. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) and (\ref{eq:WolfForces}) together will lead
261 > eqs. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) and (\ref{eq:WolfForces}) together will lead
262   to poor energy conservation.  They correctly observed that taking the
263   limit shown in equation (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) {\it after} calculating the
264   derivatives gives forces for a different potential energy function
265 < than the one shown in Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}).
265 > than the one shown in eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}).
266  
267 < Zahn \textit{et al.} proposed a modified form of this ``Wolf summation
268 < method'' as a way to use this technique in Molecular Dynamics
269 < simulations.  Taking the integral of the forces shown in equation
148 < \ref{eq:WolfForces}, they proposed a new damped Coulomb
149 < potential,
267 > Zahn \textit{et al.} introduced a modified form of this summation
268 > method as a way to use the technique in Molecular Dynamics
269 > simulations.  They proposed a new damped Coulomb potential,
270   \begin{equation}
271 < V_{\textrm{Zahn}}(r_{ij}) = q_iq_j\left\{\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r_{ij}}-\left[\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right]\left(r_{ij}-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\right\}.
271 > V_{\textrm{Zahn}}(r_{ij}) = q_iq_j\left\{\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r_{ij}}-\left[\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right]\left(r_{ij}-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\right\},
272   \label{eq:ZahnPot}
273   \end{equation}
274 < They showed that this potential does fairly well at capturing the
274 > and showed that this potential does fairly well at capturing the
275   structural and dynamic properties of water compared the same
276   properties obtained using the Ewald sum.
277  
# Line 182 | Line 302 | shifted potential,
302   \textit{et al.}  and Zahn \textit{et al.} by considering the standard
303   shifted potential,
304   \begin{equation}
305 < v_\textrm{SP}(r) =      \begin{cases}
305 > V_\textrm{SP}(r) =      \begin{cases}
306   v(r)-v_\textrm{c} &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r >
307   R_\textrm{c}  
308   \end{cases},
# Line 190 | Line 310 | and shifted force,
310   \end{equation}
311   and shifted force,
312   \begin{equation}
313 < v_\textrm{SF}(r) =      \begin{cases}
313 > V_\textrm{SF}(r) =      \begin{cases}
314   v(r)-v_\textrm{c}-\left(\frac{d v(r)}{d r}\right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}(r-R_\textrm{c})
315   &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r > R_\textrm{c}
316                                                  \end{cases},
# Line 206 | Line 326 | of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cut
326   The forces associated with the shifted potential are simply the forces
327   of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cutoff sphere),
328   \begin{equation}
329 < F_{\textrm{SP}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
329 > F_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
330   \end{equation}
331   and are zero outside.  Inside the cutoff sphere, the forces associated
332   with the shifted force form can be written,
333   \begin{equation}
334 < F_{\textrm{SF}} = \left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) - \left(\frac{d
334 > F_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
335   v(r)}{dr} \right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}.
336   \end{equation}
337  
338 < If the potential ($v(r)$) is taken to be the normal Coulomb potential,
338 > If the potential, $v(r)$, is taken to be the normal Coulomb potential,
339   \begin{equation}
340   v(r) = \frac{q_i q_j}{r},
341   \label{eq:Coulomb}
# Line 226 | Line 346 | r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
346   V_\textrm{SP}(r) =
347   q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad
348   r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
349 < \label{eq:WolfSP}
349 > \label{eq:SPPot}
350   \end{equation}
351   with associated forces,
352   \begin{equation}
353 < F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
354 < \label{eq:FWolfSP}
353 > F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
354 > \label{eq:SPForces}
355   \end{equation}
356   These forces are identical to the forces of the standard Coulomb
357   interaction, and cutting these off at $R_c$ was addressed by Wolf
# Line 250 | Line 370 | with associated forces,
370   \end{equation}
371   with associated forces,
372   \begin{equation}
373 < F_\textrm{SF}(r =  q_iq_j\left(-\frac{1}{r^2}+\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
373 > F_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
374   \label{eq:SFForces}
375   \end{equation}
376   This formulation has the benefits that there are no discontinuities at
377 < the cutoff distance, while the neutralizing image charges are present
378 < in both the energy and force expressions.  It would be simple to add
379 < the self-neutralizing term back when computing the total energy of the
377 > the cutoff radius, while the neutralizing image charges are present in
378 > both the energy and force expressions.  It would be simple to add the
379 > self-neutralizing term back when computing the total energy of the
380   system, thereby maintaining the agreement with the Madelung energies.
381   A side effect of this treatment is the alteration in the shape of the
382   potential that comes from the derivative term.  Thus, a degree of
# Line 264 | Line 384 | Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energeti
384   to gain functionality in dynamics simulations.
385  
386   Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energetics of the
387 < shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfSP}), and they found that
388 < it was still insufficient for accurate determination of the energy
389 < with reasonable cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies
390 < fluctuate around the expected value with increasing cutoff radius, but
391 < the oscillations converge toward the correct value.\cite{Wolf99} A
387 > shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}) and found that it was
388 > insufficient for accurate determination of the energy with reasonable
389 > cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies fluctuated around
390 > the expected value as the cutoff radius was increased, but the
391 > oscillations converged toward the correct value.\cite{Wolf99} A
392   damping function was incorporated to accelerate the convergence; and
393 < though alternative functional forms could be
393 > though alternative forms for the damping function could be
394   used,\cite{Jones56,Heyes81} the complimentary error function was
395   chosen to mirror the effective screening used in the Ewald summation.
396   Incorporating this error function damping into the simple Coulomb
# Line 279 | Line 399 | v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
399   v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
400   \label{eq:dampCoulomb}
401   \end{equation}
402 < the shifted potential (Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfSP})) can be recovered
283 < using eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
402 > the shifted potential (eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) becomes
403   \begin{equation}
404 < v_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_\textrm{c})}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
404 > V_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
405   \label{eq:DSPPot}
406   \end{equation}
407   with associated forces,
408   \begin{equation}
409 < f_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(-\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}-\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
409 > F_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
410   \label{eq:DSPForces}
411   \end{equation}
412 < Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a discontinuity and
413 < a lack of the image charges in the forces.  To remedy these concerns,
414 < one may derive a {\sc sf} variant by including  the derivative
415 < term in eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
412 > Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a
413 > force-discontinuity at the cutoff radius, and the image charges play
414 > no role in the forces.  To remedy these concerns, one may derive a
415 > {\sc sf} variant by including the derivative term in
416 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
417   \begin{equation}
418   \begin{split}
419 < v_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
419 > V_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
420   \label{eq:DSFPot}
421   \end{split}
422   \end{equation}
423 < The derivative of the above potential gives the following forces,
423 > The derivative of the above potential will lead to the following forces,
424   \begin{equation}
425   \begin{split}
426 < f_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha r)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{(-\alpha^2r^2)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}})}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
426 > F_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
427   \label{eq:DSFForces}
428   \end{split}
429   \end{equation}
430 + If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is set to zero, the undamped case,
431 + eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot} through \ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly
432 + recovered from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot} through \ref{eq:DSFForces}).
433  
434 < This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation
435 < \ref{eq:ZahnPot} derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are
436 < two important differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term
437 < from eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to
438 < eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb}) with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This
439 < term is {\it not} present in the Zahn potential, resulting in a
440 < potential discontinuity as particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second,
441 < the sign of the derivative portion is different.  The missing
442 < $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not affect molecular dynamics simulations
443 < (although the computed energy would be expected to have sudden jumps
444 < as particle distances crossed $R_c$).  The sign problem would be a
445 < potential source of errors, however.  In fact, it introduces a
446 < discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff, because the force function
447 < is shifted in the wrong direction and doesn't cross zero at
325 < $R_\textrm{c}$.  
434 > This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation \ref{eq:ZahnPot}
435 > derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are two important
436 > differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term from
437 > eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb})
438 > with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This term is {\it not} present
439 > in the Zahn potential, resulting in a potential discontinuity as
440 > particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second, the sign of the derivative
441 > portion is different.  The missing $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not
442 > affect molecular dynamics simulations (although the computed energy
443 > would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle distances crossed
444 > $R_c$).  The sign problem is a potential source of errors, however.
445 > In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff,
446 > because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction and
447 > doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
448  
449   Eqs. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}) and (\ref{eq:DSFForces}) result in an
450 < electrostatic summation method that is continuous in both the
451 < potential and forces and which incorporates the damping function
452 < proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99} In the rest of this
453 < paper, we will evaluate exactly how good these methods ({\sc sp}, {\sc
454 < sf}, damping) are at reproducing the correct electrostatic summation
455 < performed by the Ewald sum.
450 > electrostatic summation method in which the potential and forces are
451 > continuous at the cutoff radius and which incorporates the damping
452 > function proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99} In the rest of
453 > this paper, we will evaluate exactly how good these methods ({\sc sp},
454 > {\sc sf}, damping) are at reproducing the correct electrostatic
455 > summation performed by the Ewald sum.
456  
457   \subsection{Other alternatives}
458 < In addition to the methods described above, we will consider some
459 < other techniques that commonly get used in molecular simulations.  The
458 > In addition to the methods described above, we considered some other
459 > techniques that are commonly used in molecular simulations.  The
460   simplest of these is group-based cutoffs.  Though of little use for
461 < non-neutral molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
461 > charged molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
462   advantage of the observation that the electrostatic interactions decay
463   faster than those for monopolar pairs.\cite{Steinbach94} When
464 < considering these molecules as groups, an orientational aspect is
465 < introduced to the interactions.  Consequently, as these molecular
466 < particles move through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward
467 < due to the anisotropy of the net molecular dipole
468 < interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To maintain good energy conservation,
469 < both the potential and derivative need to be smoothly switched to zero
470 < at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79} This is accomplished using a
471 < switching function,
472 < \begin{equation}
473 < S(r) = \begin{cases} 1 &\quad r\leqslant r_\textrm{sw} \\
352 < \frac{(R_\textrm{c}+2r-3r_\textrm{sw})(R_\textrm{c}-r)^2}{(R_\textrm{c}-r_\textrm{sw})^3} &\quad r_\textrm{sw}<r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\
353 < 0 &\quad r>R_\textrm{c}
354 < \end{cases},
355 < \end{equation}
356 < where the above form is for a cubic function.  If a smooth second
357 < derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can be
358 < used.\cite{Andrea83}
464 > considering these molecules as neutral groups, the relative
465 > orientations of the molecules control the strength of the interactions
466 > at the cutoff radius.  Consequently, as these molecular particles move
467 > through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward due to the
468 > anisotropy of the net molecular dipole interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To
469 > maintain good energy conservation, both the potential and derivative
470 > need to be smoothly switched to zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79}
471 > This is accomplished using a standard switching function.  If a smooth
472 > second derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can
473 > be used.\cite{Andrea83}
474  
475   Group-based cutoffs neglect the surroundings beyond $R_\textrm{c}$,
476 < and to incorporate their effect, a method like Reaction Field ({\sc
477 < rf}) can be used.  The orignal theory for {\sc rf} was originally
478 < developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was applied in
479 < simulations for the study of water by Barker and Watts.\cite{Barker73}
480 < In application, it is simply an extension of the group-based cutoff
481 < method where the net dipole within the cutoff sphere polarizes an
482 < external dielectric, which reacts back on the central dipole.  The
483 < same switching function considerations for group-based cutoffs need to
484 < made for {\sc rf}, with the additional prespecification of a
485 < dielectric constant.
476 > and to incorporate the effects of the surroundings, a method like
477 > Reaction Field ({\sc rf}) can be used.  The original theory for {\sc
478 > rf} was originally developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was
479 > applied in simulations for the study of water by Barker and
480 > Watts.\cite{Barker73} In modern simulation codes, {\sc rf} is simply
481 > an extension of the group-based cutoff method where the net dipole
482 > within the cutoff sphere polarizes an external dielectric, which
483 > reacts back on the central dipole.  The same switching function
484 > considerations for group-based cutoffs need to made for {\sc rf}, with
485 > the additional pre-specification of a dielectric constant.
486  
487   \section{Methods}
488  
# Line 452 | Line 567 | between those computed from the particular method and
567   investigated through measurement of the angle ($\theta$) formed
568   between those computed from the particular method and those from SPME,
569   \begin{equation}
570 < \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method},
570 > \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{f}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{f}_\textrm{Method}\right),
571   \end{equation}
572   where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the
573   force vector computed using method $M$.  
# Line 482 | Line 597 | when using the reference method (SPME).
597   when using the reference method (SPME).
598  
599   \subsection{Short-time Dynamics}
600 <
601 < \subsection{Long-Time and Collective Motion}\label{sec:LongTimeMethods}
487 < Evaluation of the long-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
488 < by considering the NaCl crystal system while using a subset of the
600 > Evaluation of the short-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
601 > by considering the 1000 K NaCl crystal system while using a subset of the
602   best performing pairwise methods.  The NaCl crystal was chosen to
603   avoid possible complications involving the propagation techniques of
604 < orientational motion in molecular systems.  To enhance the atomic
605 < motion, these crystals were equilibrated at 1000 K, near the
606 < experimental $T_m$ for NaCl.  Simulations were performed under the
607 < microcanonical ensemble, and velocity autocorrelation functions
608 < (Eq. \ref{eq:vCorr}) were computed for each of the trajectories,
604 > orientational motion in molecular systems.  All systems were started
605 > with the same initial positions and velocities.  Simulations were
606 > performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
607 > autocorrelation functions (Eq. \ref{eq:vCorr}) were computed for each
608 > of the trajectories,
609   \begin{equation}
610 < C_v(t) = \langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(t)\rangle.
610 > C_v(t) = \frac{\langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(t)\rangle}{\langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(0)\rangle}.
611   \label{eq:vCorr}
612   \end{equation}
613 < Velocity autocorrelation functions require detailed short time data
614 < and long trajectories for good statistics, thus velocity information
615 < was saved every 5 fs over 100 ps trajectories.  The power spectrum
616 < ($I(\omega)$) is obtained via Fourier transform of the autocorrelation
617 < function
613 > Velocity autocorrelation functions require detailed short time data,
614 > thus velocity information was saved every 2 fs over 10 ps
615 > trajectories. Because the NaCl crystal is composed of two different
616 > atom types, the average of the two resulting velocity autocorrelation
617 > functions was used for comparisons.
618 >
619 > \subsection{Long-Time and Collective Motion}\label{sec:LongTimeMethods}
620 > Evaluation of the long-time dynamics of charged systems was performed
621 > by considering the NaCl crystal system, again while using a subset of
622 > the best performing pairwise methods.  To enhance the atomic motion,
623 > these crystals were equilibrated at 1000 K, near the experimental
624 > $T_m$ for NaCl.  Simulations were performed under the microcanonical
625 > ensemble, and velocity information was saved every 5 fs over 100 ps
626 > trajectories.  The power spectrum ($I(\omega)$) was obtained via
627 > Fourier transform of the velocity autocorrelation function
628   \begin{equation}
629   I(\omega) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}C_v(t)e^{-i\omega t}dt,
630   \label{eq:powerSpec}
631   \end{equation}
632 < where the frequency, $\omega=0,\ 1,\ ...,\ N-1$.
632 > where the frequency, $\omega=0,\ 1,\ ...,\ N-1$. Again, because the
633 > NaCl crystal is composed of two different atom types, the average of
634 > the two resulting power spectra was used for comparisons.
635  
636   \subsection{Representative Simulations}\label{sec:RepSims}
637   A variety of common and representative simulations were analyzed to
# Line 530 | Line 655 | snapshots were taken at regular intervals from higher
655   Generation of the system configurations was dependent on the system
656   type.  For the solid and liquid water configurations, configuration
657   snapshots were taken at regular intervals from higher temperature 1000
658 < SPC/E water molecule trajectories and each equilibrated individually.
659 < The solid and liquid NaCl systems consisted of 500 Na+ and 500 Cl-
660 < ions and were selected and equilibrated in the same fashion as the
661 < water systems.  For the low and high ionic strength NaCl solutions, 4
662 < and 40 ions were first solvated in a 1000 water molecule boxes
663 < respectively.  Ion and water positions were then randomly swapped, and
664 < the resulting configurations were again equilibrated individually.
665 < Finally, for the Argon/Water "charge void" systems, the identities of
666 < all the SPC/E waters within 6 \AA\ of the center of the equilibrated
667 < water configurations were converted to argon
668 < (Fig. \ref{fig:argonSlice}).
658 > SPC/E water molecule trajectories and each equilibrated
659 > individually.\cite{Berendsen87} The solid and liquid NaCl systems
660 > consisted of 500 Na+ and 500 Cl- ions and were selected and
661 > equilibrated in the same fashion as the water systems.  For the low
662 > and high ionic strength NaCl solutions, 4 and 40 ions were first
663 > solvated in a 1000 water molecule boxes respectively.  Ion and water
664 > positions were then randomly swapped, and the resulting configurations
665 > were again equilibrated individually.  Finally, for the Argon/Water
666 > "charge void" systems, the identities of all the SPC/E waters within 6
667 > \AA\ of the center of the equilibrated water configurations were
668 > converted to argon (Fig. \ref{fig:argonSlice}).
669  
670   \begin{figure}
671   \centering
# Line 570 | Line 695 | tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal
695   the energies and forces calculated.  Typical molecular mechanics
696   packages default this to a value dependent on the cutoff radius and a
697   tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller
698 < tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy in the
699 < real-space portion of the summation.\cite{Essmann95} The default
700 < TINKER tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
698 > tolerances are typically associated with increased accuracy, but this
699 > usually means more time spent calculating the reciprocal-space portion
700 > of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95} The default TINKER
701 > tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME
702   calculations, resulting in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and
703   0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
704  
# Line 594 | Line 720 | realistic results using an unmodified cutoff.  This is
720  
721   In this figure, it is apparent that it is unreasonable to expect
722   realistic results using an unmodified cutoff.  This is not all that
723 < surprising since this results in large energy fluctuations as atoms
724 < move in and out of the cutoff radius.  These fluctuations can be
725 < alleviated to some degree by using group based cutoffs with a
726 < switching function.\cite{Steinbach94} The Group Switch Cutoff row
727 < doesn't show a significant improvement in this plot because the salt
728 < and salt solution systems contain non-neutral groups, see the
723 > surprising since this results in large energy fluctuations as atoms or
724 > molecules move in and out of the cutoff radius.\cite{Rahman71,Adams79}
725 > These fluctuations can be alleviated to some degree by using group
726 > based cutoffs with a switching
727 > function.\cite{Adams79,Steinbach94,Leach01} The Group Switch Cutoff
728 > row doesn't show a significant improvement in this plot because the
729 > salt and salt solution systems contain non-neutral groups, see the
730   accompanying supporting information for a comparison where all groups
731   are neutral.
732  
733   Correcting the resulting charged cutoff sphere is one of the purposes
734   of the damped Coulomb summation proposed by Wolf \textit{et
735   al.},\cite{Wolf99} and this correction indeed improves the results as
736 < seen in the Shifted-Potental rows.  While the undamped case of this
736 > seen in the {\sc sp} rows.  While the undamped case of this
737   method is a significant improvement over the pure cutoff, it still
738   doesn't correlate that well with SPME.  Inclusion of potential damping
739   improves the results, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$ shows
# Line 791 | Line 918 | unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
918   up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damping is arguably
919   unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
920  
921 < \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
921 > \subsection{Short-Time Dynamics: Velocity Autocorrelation Functions of NaCl Crystals}
922  
923   In the previous studies using a {\sc sf} variant of the damped
924   Wolf coulomb potential, the structure and dynamics of water were
# Line 803 | Line 930 | summation methods from the above results.
930   systems and simply recapitulate their results, we decided to look at
931   the solid state dynamical behavior obtained using the best performing
932   summation methods from the above results.
933 +
934 + \begin{figure}
935 + \centering
936 + \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./vCorrPlot.pdf}
937 + \caption{Velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0.0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2). The inset is a magnification of the first trough. The times to first collision are nearly identical, but the differences can be seen in the peaks and troughs, where the undamped to weakly damped methods are stiffer than the moderately damped and SPME methods.}
938 + \label{fig:vCorrPlot}
939 + \end{figure}
940 +
941 + The short-time decays through the first collision are nearly identical
942 + in figure \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}, but the peaks and troughs of the
943 + functions show how the methods differ.  The undamped {\sc sf} method
944 + has deeper troughs (see inset in Fig. \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}) and higher
945 + peaks than any of the other methods.  As the damping function is
946 + increased, these peaks are smoothed out, and approach the SPME
947 + curve. The damping acts as a distance dependent Gaussian screening of
948 + the point charges for the pairwise summation methods; thus, the
949 + collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potential, and the
950 + stiffness of the potential is diminished as the electrostatic
951 + interactions are softened by the damping function.  With $\alpha$
952 + values of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$, the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} functions are
953 + nearly identical and track the SPME features quite well.  This is not
954 + too surprising in that the differences between the {\sc sf} and {\sc
955 + sp} potentials are mitigated with increased damping.  However, this
956 + appears to indicate that once damping is utilized, the form of the
957 + potential seems to play a lesser role in the crystal dynamics.
958  
959 + \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
960 +
961 + The short time dynamics were extended to evaluate how the differences
962 + between the methods affect the collective long-time motion.  The same
963 + electrostatic summation methods were used as in the short time
964 + velocity autocorrelation function evaluation, but the trajectories
965 + were sampled over a much longer time. The power spectra of the
966 + resulting velocity autocorrelation functions were calculated and are
967 + displayed in figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.
968 +
969   \begin{figure}
970   \centering
971   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./spectraSquare.pdf}
# Line 811 | Line 973 | summation methods from the above results.
973   \label{fig:methodPS}
974   \end{figure}
975  
976 < Figure \ref{fig:methodPS} shows the power spectra for the NaCl
977 < crystals (from averaged Na and Cl ion velocity autocorrelation
978 < functions) using the stated electrostatic summation methods.  While
979 < high frequency peaks of all the spectra overlap, showing the same
980 < general features, the low frequency region shows how the summation
981 < methods differ.  Considering the low-frequency inset (expanded in the
982 < upper frame of figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at frequencies below 100
983 < cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are blue-shifted when using undamped
984 < or weakly damped {\sc sf}.  When using moderate damping ($\alpha
985 < = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp}
986 < methods give near identical correlated motion behavior as the Ewald
987 < method (which has a damping value of 0.3119).  The damping acts as a
988 < distance dependent Gaussian screening of the point charges for the
989 < pairwise summation methods.  This weakening of the electrostatic
990 < interaction with distance explains why the long-ranged correlated
829 < motions are at lower frequencies for the moderately damped methods
830 < than for undamped or weakly damped methods.  To see this effect more
831 < clearly, we show how damping strength affects a simple real-space
832 < electrostatic potential,
976 > While high frequency peaks of the spectra in this figure overlap,
977 > showing the same general features, the low frequency region shows how
978 > the summation methods differ.  Considering the low-frequency inset
979 > (expanded in the upper frame of figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at
980 > frequencies below 100 cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are
981 > blue-shifted when using undamped or weakly damped {\sc sf}.  When
982 > using moderate damping ($\alpha = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the {\sc sf}
983 > and {\sc sp} methods give near identical correlated motion behavior as
984 > the Ewald method (which has a damping value of 0.3119).  This
985 > weakening of the electrostatic interaction with increased damping
986 > explains why the long-ranged correlated motions are at lower
987 > frequencies for the moderately damped methods than for undamped or
988 > weakly damped methods.  To see this effect more clearly, we show how
989 > damping strength alone affects a simple real-space electrostatic
990 > potential,
991   \begin{equation}
992   V_\textrm{damped}=\sum^N_i\sum^N_{j\ne i}q_iq_j\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}({\alpha r})}{r}\right]S(r),
993   \end{equation}
# Line 844 | Line 1002 | blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resid
1002   shift to higher frequency in exponential fashion.  Though not shown,
1003   the spectrum for the simple undamped electrostatic potential is
1004   blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resides near 325
1005 < cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped {\sc sf}
1006 < method producing low-lying motion peaks within 10 cm$^{-1}$ of SPME is
1007 < quite respectable; however, it appears as though moderate damping is
1008 < required for accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
1005 > cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped {\sc sf} method
1006 > producing low-lying motion peaks within 10 cm$^{-1}$ of SPME is quite
1007 > respectable and shows that the shifted force procedure accounts for
1008 > most of the effect afforded through use of the Ewald summation.
1009 > However, it appears as though moderate damping is required for
1010 > accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
1011   \begin{figure}
1012   \centering
1013   \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./comboSquare.pdf}
1014 < \caption{Upper: Zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  Lower: Low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
1014 > \caption{Regions of spectra showing the low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K using various electrostatic summation methods.  The upper plot is a zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  The lower plot is of spectra when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
1015   \label{fig:dampInc}
1016   \end{figure}
1017  
# Line 891 | Line 1051 | today, the Ewald summation may no longer be required t
1051   standard by which these simple pairwise sums are judged.  However,
1052   these results do suggest that in the typical simulations performed
1053   today, the Ewald summation may no longer be required to obtain the
1054 < level of accuracy most researcher have come to expect
1054 > level of accuracy most researchers have come to expect
1055  
1056   \section{Acknowledgments}
1057   \newpage

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines