ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2599 by chrisfen, Tue Feb 28 14:09:55 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2649 by chrisfen, Tue Mar 21 14:58:12 2006 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1   %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2 < \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2 > %\documentclass[aps,prb,preprint]{revtex4}
3 > \documentclass[11pt]{article}
4   \usepackage{endfloat}
5 < \usepackage{amsmath}
5 > \usepackage{amsmath,bm}
6   \usepackage{amssymb}
6 %\usepackage{ifsym}
7   \usepackage{epsf}
8   \usepackage{times}
9 < \usepackage{mathptm}
9 > \usepackage{mathptmx}
10   \usepackage{setspace}
11   \usepackage{tabularx}
12   \usepackage{graphicx}
13   \usepackage{booktabs}
14 < %\usepackage{berkeley}
14 > \usepackage{bibentry}
15 > \usepackage{mathrsfs}
16   \usepackage[ref]{overcite}
17   \pagestyle{plain}
18   \pagenumbering{arabic}
# Line 24 | Line 25
25  
26   \begin{document}
27  
28 < \title{Is the Ewald Summation necessary in typical molecular simulations: Alternatives to the accepted standard of cutoff policies}
28 > \title{Is the Ewald Summation necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics}
29  
30 < \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter \\
30 > \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail:
31 > gezelter@nd.edu} \\
32   Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\
33   University of Notre Dame\\
34   Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
# Line 34 | Line 36 | Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
36   \date{\today}
37  
38   \maketitle
39 < %\doublespacing
39 > \doublespacing
40  
41 + \nobibliography{}
42   \begin{abstract}
43 + A new method for accumulating electrostatic interactions was derived
44 + from the previous efforts described in \bibentry{Wolf99} and
45 + \bibentry{Zahn02} as a possible replacement for lattice sum methods in
46 + molecular simulations.  Comparisons were performed with this and other
47 + pairwise electrostatic summation techniques against the smooth
48 + particle mesh Ewald (SPME) summation to see how well they reproduce
49 + the energetics and dynamics of a variety of simulation types.  The
50 + newly derived Shifted-Force technique shows a remarkable ability to
51 + reproduce the behavior exhibited in simulations using SPME with an
52 + $\mathscr{O}(N)$ computational cost, equivalent to merely the
53 + real-space portion of the lattice summation.
54 +
55   \end{abstract}
56  
57 + \newpage
58 +
59   %\narrowtext
60  
61 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
61 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
62   %                              BODY OF TEXT
63 < %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
63 > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
64  
65   \section{Introduction}
66  
67 < In this paper, a variety of simulation situations were analyzed to determine the relative effectiveness of the adapted Wolf spherical truncation schemes at reproducing the results obtained using a smooth particle mesh Ewald (SPME) summation technique.  In addition to the Shifted-Potential and Shifted-Force adapted Wolf methods, both reaction field and uncorrected cutoff methods were included for comparison purposes.  The general usability of these methods in both Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics calculations was assessed through statistical analysis over the combined results from all of the following studied systems:
68 < \begin{enumerate}
69 < \item Liquid Water
70 < \item Crystalline Water (Ice I$_\textrm{c}$)
71 < \item NaCl Crystal
72 < \item NaCl Melt
73 < \item Low Ionic Strength Solution of NaCl in Water
74 < \item High Ionic Strength Solution of NaCl in Water
75 < \item 6 \AA\  Radius Sphere of Argon in Water
76 < \end{enumerate}
77 < Additional discussion on the results from the individual systems was also performed to identify limitations of the considered methods in specific systems.
67 > In molecular simulations, proper accumulation of the electrostatic
68 > interactions is essential and is one of the most
69 > computationally-demanding tasks.  The common molecular mechanics force
70 > fields represent atomic sites with full or partial charges protected
71 > by Lennard-Jones (short range) interactions.  This means that nearly
72 > every pair interaction involves a calculation of charge-charge forces.
73 > Coupled with relatively long-ranged $r^{-1}$ decay, the monopole
74 > interactions quickly become the most expensive part of molecular
75 > simulations.  Historically, the electrostatic pair interaction would
76 > not have decayed appreciably within the typical box lengths that could
77 > be feasibly simulated.  In the larger systems that are more typical of
78 > modern simulations, large cutoffs should be used to incorporate
79 > electrostatics correctly.
80  
81 < \section{Methods}
81 > There have been many efforts to address the proper and practical
82 > handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have resulted in a
83 > variety of techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are
84 > typically classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics,
85 > static dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods
86 > (i.e., Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
87 > truncation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
88 > reaction field type methods, fast multipole
89 > methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
90 > often preferred because they physically incorporate solvent molecules
91 > in the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult
92 > to utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
93 > addition to the computational cost, there have been some questions
94 > regarding possible artifacts caused by the inherent periodicity of the
95 > explicit Ewald summation.\cite{Tobias01}
96  
97 < In each of the simulated systems, 500 distinct configurations were generated, and the electrostatic summation methods were compared via sequential application on each of these fixed configurations.  The methods compared include SPME, the aforementioned Shifted Potential and Shifted Force methods - both with damping parameters ($\alpha$) of 0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$, reaction field with an infinite dielectric constant, and an unmodified cutoff.  Group-based cutoffs with a fifth-order polynomial switching function were necessary for the reaction field simulations and were utilized in the SP, SF, and pure cutoff methods for comparison to the standard lack of group-based cutoffs with a hard truncation.  
97 > In this paper, we focus on a new set of shifted methods devised by
98 > Wolf {\it et al.},\cite{Wolf99} which we further extend.  These
99 > methods along with a few other mixed methods (i.e. reaction field) are
100 > compared with the smooth particle mesh Ewald
101 > sum,\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} which is our reference method for
102 > handling long-range electrostatic interactions. The new methods for
103 > handling electrostatics have the potential to scale linearly with
104 > increasing system size since they involve only a simple modification
105 > to the direct pairwise sum.  They also lack the added periodicity of
106 > the Ewald sum, so they can be used for systems which are non-periodic
107 > or which have one- or two-dimensional periodicity.  Below, these
108 > methods are evaluated using a variety of model systems to establish
109 > their usability in molecular simulations.
110  
111 < Generation of the system configurations was dependent on the system type.  For the solid and liquid water configurations, configuration snapshots were taken at regular intervals from higher temperature 1000 SPC/E water molecule trajectories and each equilibrated individually.  The solid and liquid NaCl systems consisted of 500 Na+ and 500 Cl- ions and were selected and equilibrated in the same fashion as the water systems.  For the low and high ionic strength NaCl solutions, 4 and 40 ions were first solvated in a 1000 water molecule boxes respectively.  Ion and water positions were then randomly swapped, and the resulting configurations were again equilibrated individually.  Finally, for the Argon/Water "charge void" systems, the identities of all the SPC/E waters within 6 \AA\ of the center of the equilibrated water configurations were converted to argon (Fig. \ref{argonSlice}).
111 > \subsection{The Ewald Sum}
112 > The complete accumulation electrostatic interactions in a system with
113 > periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the
114 > effect of all charges within a (cubic) simulation box as well as those
115 > in the periodic replicas,
116 > \begin{equation}
117 > V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi\left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right) \right],
118 > \label{eq:PBCSum}
119 > \end{equation}
120 > where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box
121 > replicas with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the
122 > prime indicates $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} =
123 > 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic
124 > particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is
125 > the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler angles for $i$ and
126 > $j$, and $\phi$ is the solution to Poisson's equation
127 > ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for
128 > charge-charge interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
129 > eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is divergent for
130 > non-neutral systems.
131  
132 + The electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
133 + for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
134 + took was to convert this conditionally convergent sum into two
135 + absolutely convergent summations: a short-ranged real-space summation
136 + and a long-ranged reciprocal-space summation,
137 + \begin{equation}
138 + \begin{split}
139 + V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}& \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \Biggr[ q_i q_j\Biggr( {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left( \alpha|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|\right)}{|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|} \\ &+ \frac{1}{\pi L^3}\sum_{\mathbf{k}\ne 0}\frac{4\pi^2}{|\mathbf{k}|^2} \exp{\left(-\frac{\pi^2|\mathbf{k}|^2}{\alpha^2}\right) \cos\left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}_{ij}\right)}\Biggr)\Biggr] \\ &- \frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\sum_{i=1}^N q_i^2 + \frac{2\pi}{(2\epsilon_\textrm{S}+1)L^3}\left|\sum_{i=1}^N q_i\mathbf{r}_i\right|^2,
140 + \end{split}
141 + \label{eq:EwaldSum}
142 + \end{equation}
143 + where $\alpha$ is the damping or convergence parameter with units of
144 + \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and are equal to
145 + $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the dielectric
146 + constant of the surrounding medium. The final two terms of
147 + eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
148 + for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
149 + dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
150 + simulations,\cite{Brush66,Woodcock71} until it was introduced by de
151 + Leeuw {\it et al.} to address situations where the unit cell has a
152 + dipole moment which is magnified through replication of the periodic
153 + images.\cite{deLeeuw80,Smith81} If this term is taken to be zero, the
154 + system is said to be using conducting (or ``tin-foil'') boundary
155 + conditions, $\epsilon_{\rm S} = \infty$. Figure
156 + \ref{fig:ewaldTime} shows how the Ewald sum has been applied over
157 + time.  Initially, due to the small sizes of the systems that could be
158 + feasibly simulated, the entire simulation box was replicated to
159 + convergence.  In more modern simulations, the simulation boxes have
160 + grown large enough that a real-space cutoff could potentially give
161 + convergent behavior.  Indeed, it has often been observed that the
162 + reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald sum can be small and rapidly
163 + convergent compared to the real-space portion with the choice of small
164 + $\alpha$.\cite{Karasawa89,Kolafa92}
165 +
166   \begin{figure}
167   \centering
168 < \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{./slice.pdf}
169 < \caption{A slice from the center of a water box used in a charge void simulation.  The darkened region represents the boundary sphere within which the water molecules were converted to argon atoms.}
170 < \label{argonSlice}
168 > \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./ewaldProgression.pdf}
169 > \caption{How the application of the Ewald summation has changed with
170 > the increase in computer power.  Initially, only small numbers of
171 > particles could be studied, and the Ewald sum acted to replicate the
172 > unit cell charge distribution out to convergence.  Now, much larger
173 > systems of charges are investigated with fixed distance cutoffs.  The
174 > calculated structure factor is used to sum out to great distance, and
175 > a surrounding dielectric term is included.}
176 > \label{fig:ewaldTime}
177   \end{figure}
178  
179 < All of these comparisons were performed with three different cutoff radii (9, 12, and 15 \AA) to investigate the cutoff radius dependence of the various techniques.  It should be noted that the damping parameter chosen in SPME, or so called ``Ewald Coefficient", has a significant effect on the energies and forces calculated.  Typical molecular mechanics packages default this to a value dependent on the cutoff radius and a tolerance (typically less than $1 \times 10^{-5}$ kcal/mol).  We chose a tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$, resulting in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and 0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
179 > The original Ewald summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The
180 > convergence parameter $(\alpha)$ plays an important role in balancing
181 > the computational cost between the direct and reciprocal-space
182 > portions of the summation.  The choice of this value allows one to
183 > select whether the real-space or reciprocal space portion of the
184 > summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calculation (with the other being
185 > $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With the appropriate choice of
186 > $\alpha$ and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be
187 > reduced to $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route
188 > taken to reduce the cost of the Ewald summation even further is to set
189 > $\alpha$ such that the real-space interactions decay rapidly, allowing
190 > for a short spherical cutoff. Then the reciprocal space summation is
191 > optimized.  These optimizations usually involve utilization of the
192 > fast Fourier transform (FFT),\cite{Hockney81} leading to the
193 > particle-particle particle-mesh (P3M) and particle mesh Ewald (PME)
194 > methods.\cite{Shimada93,Luty94,Luty95,Darden93,Essmann95} In these
195 > methods, the cost of the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald
196 > summation is reduced from $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ down to $\mathscr{O}(N
197 > \log N)$.
198  
199 < \section{Results and Discussion}
199 > These developments and optimizations have made the use of the Ewald
200 > summation routine in simulations with periodic boundary
201 > conditions. However, in certain systems, such as vapor-liquid
202 > interfaces and membranes, the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity
203 > can prove problematic.  The Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
204 > 2D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89}, but the
205 > new methods are computationally expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99}
206 > Inclusion of a correction term in the Ewald summation is a possible
207 > direction for handling 2D systems while still enabling the use of the
208 > modern optimizations.\cite{Yeh99}
209  
210 < \subsection{$\Delta E$ Comparison}
211 < In order to evaluate the performance of the adapted Wolf Shifted Potential and Shifted Force electrostatic summation methods for Monte Carlo simulations, the energy differences between configurations need to be compared to the results using SPME.  Considering the SPME results to be the correct or desired behavior, ideal performance of a tested method is taken to be agreement between the energy differences calculated.  Linear least squares regression of the $\Delta E$ values between configurations using SPME against $\Delta E$ values using tested methods provides a quantitative comparison of this agreement.  Unitary results for both the correlation and correlation coefficient for these regressions indicate equivalent energetic results between the methods.  The correlation is the slope of the plotted data while the correlation coefficient ($R^2$) is a measure of the of the data scatter around the fitted line and gives an idea of the quality of the fit (Fig. \ref{linearFit}).
210 > Several studies have recognized that the inherent periodicity in the
211 > Ewald sum can also have an effect on three-dimensional
212 > systems.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}
213 > Solvated proteins are essentially kept at high concentration due to
214 > the periodicity of the electrostatic summation method.  In these
215 > systems, the more compact folded states of a protein can be
216 > artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
217 > Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care must be taken when
218 > considering the use of the Ewald summation where the assumed
219 > periodicity would introduce spurious effects in the system dynamics.
220  
221 + \subsection{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
222 + In a recent paper by Wolf \textit{et al.}, a procedure was outlined
223 + for the accurate accumulation of electrostatic interactions in an
224 + efficient pairwise fashion.  This procedure lacks the inherent
225 + periodicity of the Ewald summation.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.}
226 + observed that the electrostatic interaction is effectively
227 + short-ranged in condensed phase systems and that neutralization of the
228 + charge contained within the cutoff radius is crucial for potential
229 + stability. They devised a pairwise summation method that ensures
230 + charge neutrality and gives results similar to those obtained with the
231 + Ewald summation.  The resulting shifted Coulomb potential
232 + (Eq. \ref{eq:WolfPot}) includes image-charges subtracted out through
233 + placement on the cutoff sphere and a distance-dependent damping
234 + function (identical to that seen in the real-space portion of the
235 + Ewald sum) to aid convergence
236 + \begin{equation}
237 + V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}-\lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}\left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
238 + \label{eq:WolfPot}
239 + \end{equation}
240 + Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) is essentially the common form of a shifted
241 + potential.  However, neutralizing the charge contained within each
242 + cutoff sphere requires the placement of a self-image charge on the
243 + surface of the cutoff sphere.  This additional self-term in the total
244 + potential enabled Wolf {\it et al.}  to obtain excellent estimates of
245 + Madelung energies for many crystals.
246 +
247 + In order to use their charge-neutralized potential in molecular
248 + dynamics simulations, Wolf \textit{et al.} suggested taking the
249 + derivative of this potential prior to evaluation of the limit.  This
250 + procedure gives an expression for the forces,
251 + \begin{equation}
252 + F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j\left\{\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r^2_{ij}}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2\right)}}{r_{ij}}\right]-\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right]\right\},
253 + \label{eq:WolfForces}
254 + \end{equation}
255 + that incorporates both image charges and damping of the electrostatic
256 + interaction.
257 +
258 + More recently, Zahn \textit{et al.} investigated these potential and
259 + force expressions for use in simulations involving water.\cite{Zahn02}
260 + In their work, they pointed out that the forces and derivative of
261 + the potential are not commensurate.  Attempts to use both
262 + eqs. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) and (\ref{eq:WolfForces}) together will lead
263 + to poor energy conservation.  They correctly observed that taking the
264 + limit shown in equation (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) {\it after} calculating the
265 + derivatives gives forces for a different potential energy function
266 + than the one shown in eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}).
267 +
268 + Zahn \textit{et al.} introduced a modified form of this summation
269 + method as a way to use the technique in Molecular Dynamics
270 + simulations.  They proposed a new damped Coulomb potential,
271 + \begin{equation}
272 + V_{\textrm{Zahn}}(r_{ij}) = q_iq_j\left\{\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r_{ij}}-\left[\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right]\left(r_{ij}-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\right\},
273 + \label{eq:ZahnPot}
274 + \end{equation}
275 + and showed that this potential does fairly well at capturing the
276 + structural and dynamic properties of water compared the same
277 + properties obtained using the Ewald sum.
278 +
279 + \subsection{Simple Forms for Pairwise Electrostatics}
280 +
281 + The potentials proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.} and Zahn \textit{et
282 + al.} are constructed using two different (and separable) computational
283 + tricks: \begin{enumerate}
284 + \item shifting through the use of image charges, and
285 + \item damping the electrostatic interaction.
286 + \end{enumerate}  Wolf \textit{et al.} treated the
287 + development of their summation method as a progressive application of
288 + these techniques,\cite{Wolf99} while Zahn \textit{et al.} founded
289 + their damped Coulomb modification (Eq. (\ref{eq:ZahnPot})) on the
290 + post-limit forces (Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfForces})) which were derived using
291 + both techniques.  It is possible, however, to separate these
292 + tricks and study their effects independently.
293 +
294 + Starting with the original observation that the effective range of the
295 + electrostatic interaction in condensed phases is considerably less
296 + than $r^{-1}$, either the cutoff sphere neutralization or the
297 + distance-dependent damping technique could be used as a foundation for
298 + a new pairwise summation method.  Wolf \textit{et al.} made the
299 + observation that charge neutralization within the cutoff sphere plays
300 + a significant role in energy convergence; therefore we will begin our
301 + analysis with the various shifted forms that maintain this charge
302 + neutralization.  We can evaluate the methods of Wolf
303 + \textit{et al.}  and Zahn \textit{et al.} by considering the standard
304 + shifted potential,
305 + \begin{equation}
306 + V_\textrm{SP}(r) =      \begin{cases}
307 + v(r)-v_\textrm{c} &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r >
308 + R_\textrm{c}  
309 + \end{cases},
310 + \label{eq:shiftingPotForm}
311 + \end{equation}
312 + and shifted force,
313 + \begin{equation}
314 + V_\textrm{SF}(r) =      \begin{cases}
315 + v(r)-v_\textrm{c}-\left(\frac{d v(r)}{d r}\right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}(r-R_\textrm{c})
316 + &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r > R_\textrm{c}
317 +                                                \end{cases},
318 + \label{eq:shiftingForm}
319 + \end{equation}
320 + functions where $v(r)$ is the unshifted form of the potential, and
321 + $v_c$ is $v(R_\textrm{c})$.  The Shifted Force ({\sc sf}) form ensures
322 + that both the potential and the forces goes to zero at the cutoff
323 + radius, while the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) form only ensures the
324 + potential is smooth at the cutoff radius
325 + ($R_\textrm{c}$).\cite{Allen87}
326 +
327 + The forces associated with the shifted potential are simply the forces
328 + of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cutoff sphere),
329 + \begin{equation}
330 + F_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
331 + \end{equation}
332 + and are zero outside.  Inside the cutoff sphere, the forces associated
333 + with the shifted force form can be written,
334 + \begin{equation}
335 + F_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
336 + v(r)}{dr} \right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}.
337 + \end{equation}
338 +
339 + If the potential, $v(r)$, is taken to be the normal Coulomb potential,
340 + \begin{equation}
341 + v(r) = \frac{q_i q_j}{r},
342 + \label{eq:Coulomb}
343 + \end{equation}
344 + then the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) forms will give Wolf {\it et
345 + al.}'s undamped prescription:
346 + \begin{equation}
347 + V_\textrm{SP}(r) =
348 + q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad
349 + r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
350 + \label{eq:SPPot}
351 + \end{equation}
352 + with associated forces,
353 + \begin{equation}
354 + F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
355 + \label{eq:SPForces}
356 + \end{equation}
357 + These forces are identical to the forces of the standard Coulomb
358 + interaction, and cutting these off at $R_c$ was addressed by Wolf
359 + \textit{et al.} as undesirable.  They pointed out that the effect of
360 + the image charges is neglected in the forces when this form is
361 + used,\cite{Wolf99} thereby eliminating any benefit from the method in
362 + molecular dynamics.  Additionally, there is a discontinuity in the
363 + forces at the cutoff radius which results in energy drift during MD
364 + simulations.
365 +
366 + The shifted force ({\sc sf}) form using the normal Coulomb potential
367 + will give,
368 + \begin{equation}
369 + V_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}+\left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
370 + \label{eq:SFPot}
371 + \end{equation}
372 + with associated forces,
373 + \begin{equation}
374 + F_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
375 + \label{eq:SFForces}
376 + \end{equation}
377 + This formulation has the benefits that there are no discontinuities at
378 + the cutoff radius, while the neutralizing image charges are present in
379 + both the energy and force expressions.  It would be simple to add the
380 + self-neutralizing term back when computing the total energy of the
381 + system, thereby maintaining the agreement with the Madelung energies.
382 + A side effect of this treatment is the alteration in the shape of the
383 + potential that comes from the derivative term.  Thus, a degree of
384 + clarity about agreement with the empirical potential is lost in order
385 + to gain functionality in dynamics simulations.
386 +
387 + Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energetics of the
388 + shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}) and found that it was
389 + insufficient for accurate determination of the energy with reasonable
390 + cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies fluctuated around
391 + the expected value as the cutoff radius was increased, but the
392 + oscillations converged toward the correct value.\cite{Wolf99} A
393 + damping function was incorporated to accelerate the convergence; and
394 + though alternative forms for the damping function could be
395 + used,\cite{Jones56,Heyes81} the complimentary error function was
396 + chosen to mirror the effective screening used in the Ewald summation.
397 + Incorporating this error function damping into the simple Coulomb
398 + potential,
399 + \begin{equation}
400 + v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
401 + \label{eq:dampCoulomb}
402 + \end{equation}
403 + the shifted potential (eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) becomes
404 + \begin{equation}
405 + V_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
406 + \label{eq:DSPPot}
407 + \end{equation}
408 + with associated forces,
409 + \begin{equation}
410 + F_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
411 + \label{eq:DSPForces}
412 + \end{equation}
413 + Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a
414 + force-discontinuity at the cutoff radius, and the image charges play
415 + no role in the forces.  To remedy these concerns, one may derive a
416 + {\sc sf} variant by including the derivative term in
417 + eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
418 + \begin{equation}
419 + \begin{split}
420 + V_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}-\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\ &\left.+\left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}\right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
421 + \label{eq:DSFPot}
422 + \end{split}
423 + \end{equation}
424 + The derivative of the above potential will lead to the following forces,
425 + \begin{equation}
426 + \begin{split}
427 + F_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\ &\left.-\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}+\frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}\right)\right] \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
428 + \label{eq:DSFForces}
429 + \end{split}
430 + \end{equation}
431 + If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is set to zero, the undamped case,
432 + eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot} through \ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly
433 + recovered from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot} through \ref{eq:DSFForces}).
434 +
435 + This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation \ref{eq:ZahnPot}
436 + derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are two important
437 + differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term from
438 + eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb})
439 + with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This term is {\it not} present
440 + in the Zahn potential, resulting in a potential discontinuity as
441 + particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second, the sign of the derivative
442 + portion is different.  The missing $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not
443 + affect molecular dynamics simulations (although the computed energy
444 + would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle distances crossed
445 + $R_c$).  The sign problem is a potential source of errors, however.
446 + In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff,
447 + because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction and
448 + doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
449 +
450 + Eqs. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}) and (\ref{eq:DSFForces}) result in an
451 + electrostatic summation method in which the potential and forces are
452 + continuous at the cutoff radius and which incorporates the damping
453 + function proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99} In the rest of
454 + this paper, we will evaluate exactly how good these methods ({\sc sp},
455 + {\sc sf}, damping) are at reproducing the correct electrostatic
456 + summation performed by the Ewald sum.
457 +
458 + \subsection{Other alternatives}
459 + In addition to the methods described above, we considered some other
460 + techniques that are commonly used in molecular simulations.  The
461 + simplest of these is group-based cutoffs.  Though of little use for
462 + charged molecules, collecting atoms into neutral groups takes
463 + advantage of the observation that the electrostatic interactions decay
464 + faster than those for monopolar pairs.\cite{Steinbach94} When
465 + considering these molecules as neutral groups, the relative
466 + orientations of the molecules control the strength of the interactions
467 + at the cutoff radius.  Consequently, as these molecular particles move
468 + through $R_\textrm{c}$, the energy will drift upward due to the
469 + anisotropy of the net molecular dipole interactions.\cite{Rahman71} To
470 + maintain good energy conservation, both the potential and derivative
471 + need to be smoothly switched to zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.\cite{Adams79}
472 + This is accomplished using a standard switching function.  If a smooth
473 + second derivative is desired, a fifth (or higher) order polynomial can
474 + be used.\cite{Andrea83}
475 +
476 + Group-based cutoffs neglect the surroundings beyond $R_\textrm{c}$,
477 + and to incorporate the effects of the surroundings, a method like
478 + Reaction Field ({\sc rf}) can be used.  The original theory for {\sc
479 + rf} was originally developed by Onsager,\cite{Onsager36} and it was
480 + applied in simulations for the study of water by Barker and
481 + Watts.\cite{Barker73} In modern simulation codes, {\sc rf} is simply
482 + an extension of the group-based cutoff method where the net dipole
483 + within the cutoff sphere polarizes an external dielectric, which
484 + reacts back on the central dipole.  The same switching function
485 + considerations for group-based cutoffs need to made for {\sc rf}, with
486 + the additional pre-specification of a dielectric constant.
487 +
488 + \section{Methods}
489 +
490 + In classical molecular mechanics simulations, there are two primary
491 + techniques utilized to obtain information about the system of
492 + interest: Monte Carlo (MC) and Molecular Dynamics (MD).  Both of these
493 + techniques utilize pairwise summations of interactions between
494 + particle sites, but they use these summations in different ways.
495 +
496 + In MC, the potential energy difference between configurations dictates
497 + the progression of MC sampling.  Going back to the origins of this
498 + method, the acceptance criterion for the canonical ensemble laid out
499 + by Metropolis \textit{et al.} states that a subsequent configuration
500 + is accepted if $\Delta E < 0$ or if $\xi < \exp(-\Delta E/kT)$, where
501 + $\xi$ is a random number between 0 and 1.\cite{Metropolis53}
502 + Maintaining the correct $\Delta E$ when using an alternate method for
503 + handling the long-range electrostatics will ensure proper sampling
504 + from the ensemble.
505 +
506 + In MD, the derivative of the potential governs how the system will
507 + progress in time.  Consequently, the force and torque vectors on each
508 + body in the system dictate how the system evolves.  If the magnitude
509 + and direction of these vectors are similar when using alternate
510 + electrostatic summation techniques, the dynamics in the short term
511 + will be indistinguishable.  Because error in MD calculations is
512 + cumulative, one should expect greater deviation at longer times,
513 + although methods which have large differences in the force and torque
514 + vectors will diverge from each other more rapidly.
515 +
516 + \subsection{Monte Carlo and the Energy Gap}\label{sec:MCMethods}
517 +
518 + The pairwise summation techniques (outlined in section
519 + \ref{sec:ESMethods}) were evaluated for use in MC simulations by
520 + studying the energy differences between conformations.  We took the
521 + SPME-computed energy difference between two conformations to be the
522 + correct behavior. An ideal performance by an alternative method would
523 + reproduce these energy differences exactly (even if the absolute
524 + energies calculated by the methods are different).  Since none of the
525 + methods provide exact energy differences, we used linear least squares
526 + regressions of energy gap data to evaluate how closely the methods
527 + mimicked the Ewald energy gaps.  Unitary results for both the
528 + correlation (slope) and correlation coefficient for these regressions
529 + indicate perfect agreement between the alternative method and SPME.
530 + Sample correlation plots for two alternate methods are shown in
531 + Fig. \ref{fig:linearFit}.
532 +
533   \begin{figure}
534   \centering
535 < \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{./linearFit.pdf}
536 < \caption{Example least squares regression of the $\Delta E$ between configurations for the SF method against SPME in the pure water system.  }
537 < \label{linearFit}
535 > \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./dualLinear.pdf}
536 > \caption{Example least squares regressions of the configuration energy
537 > differences for SPC/E water systems. The upper plot shows a data set
538 > with a poor correlation coefficient ($R^2$), while the lower plot
539 > shows a data set with a good correlation coefficient.}
540 > \label{fig:linearFit}
541   \end{figure}
542  
543 < With 500 independent configurations, 124,750 $\Delta E$ data points are used in a regression of a single system.  Results and discussion for the individual analysis of each of the system types appear in the supporting information.  To probe the applicability of each method in the general case, all the different system types were included in a single regression.  The results for this regression are shown in figure \ref{delE}.  
543 > Each system type (detailed in section \ref{sec:RepSims}) was
544 > represented using 500 independent configurations.  Additionally, we
545 > used seven different system types, so each of the alternative
546 > (non-Ewald) electrostatic summation methods was evaluated using
547 > 873,250 configurational energy differences.
548  
549 + Results and discussion for the individual analysis of each of the
550 + system types appear in the supporting information, while the
551 + cumulative results over all the investigated systems appears below in
552 + section \ref{sec:EnergyResults}.
553 +
554 + \subsection{Molecular Dynamics and the Force and Torque Vectors}\label{sec:MDMethods}
555 + We evaluated the pairwise methods (outlined in section
556 + \ref{sec:ESMethods}) for use in MD simulations by
557 + comparing the force and torque vectors with those obtained using the
558 + reference Ewald summation (SPME).  Both the magnitude and the
559 + direction of these vectors on each of the bodies in the system were
560 + analyzed.  For the magnitude of these vectors, linear least squares
561 + regression analyses were performed as described previously for
562 + comparing $\Delta E$ values.  Instead of a single energy difference
563 + between two system configurations, we compared the magnitudes of the
564 + forces (and torques) on each molecule in each configuration.  For a
565 + system of 1000 water molecules and 40 ions, there are 1040 force
566 + vectors and 1000 torque vectors.  With 500 configurations, this
567 + results in 520,000 force and 500,000 torque vector comparisons.
568 + Additionally, data from seven different system types was aggregated
569 + before the comparison was made.
570 +
571 + The {\it directionality} of the force and torque vectors was
572 + investigated through measurement of the angle ($\theta$) formed
573 + between those computed from the particular method and those from SPME,
574 + \begin{equation}
575 + \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{F}_\textrm{SPME} \cdot \hat{F}_\textrm{M}\right),
576 + \end{equation}
577 + where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the force
578 + vector computed using method M.
579 +
580 + Each of these $\theta$ values was accumulated in a distribution
581 + function and weighted by the area on the unit sphere.  Non-linear
582 + Gaussian fits were used to measure the width of the resulting
583 + distributions.
584 +
585   \begin{figure}
586   \centering
587 < \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{./delEplot.pdf}
588 < \caption{The results from the statistical analysis of the $\Delta$E results for all the system types at 9 \AA\ (${\bullet}$), 12 \AA\ ($\blacksquare$), and 15 \AA\ ($\blacktriangledown$) cutoff radii.  Results close to a value of 1 (dashed line) indicate $\Delta E$ values from that particular method (listed on the left) are nearly indistinguishable from those obtained from SPME.  Reaction Field results do not include NaCl crystal or melt configurations.}
589 < \label{delE}
587 > \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./gaussFit.pdf}
588 > \caption{Sample fit of the angular distribution of the force vectors
589 > accumulated using all of the studied systems.  Gaussian fits were used
590 > to obtain values for the variance in force and torque vectors.}
591 > \label{fig:gaussian}
592   \end{figure}
593  
594 < In figure \ref{delE}, it is apparent that it is unreasonable to expect realistic results using an unmodified cutoff.  This is not all that surprising since this results in large energy fluctuations as atoms move in and out of the cutoff radius.  These fluctuations can be alleviated to some degree by using group based cutoffs with a switching function.  The Group Switch Cutoff row doesn't show a significant improvement in this plot because the salt and salt solution systems contain non-neutral groups, see the accompanying supporting information for a comparison where all groups are neutral.  Correcting the resulting charged cutoff sphere is one of the purposes of the shifted potential proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.}, and this correction indeed improves the results as seen in the Shifted Potental rows.  While the undamped case of this method is a significant improvement over the pure cutoff, it still doesn't correlate that well with SPME.  Inclusion of potential damping improves the results, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$ shows an excellent correlation and quality of fit with the SPME results, particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12 \AA .  Use of a larger damping parameter is more helpful for the shortest cutoff shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations with larger cutoffs.  This trend is repeated in the Shifted Force rows, where increasing damping results in progressively poorer correlation; however, damping looks to be unnecessary with this method.  Overall, the undamped case is the best performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  This result is beneficial in that the undamped case is less computationally prohibitive do to the lack of complimentary error function calculation when performing the electrostatic pair interaction.  The reaction field results illustrates some of that method's limitations, primarily that it was developed for use in homogenous systems; although it does provide results that are an improvement over those from an unmodified cutoff.
594 > Figure \ref{fig:gaussian} shows an example distribution with applied
595 > non-linear fits.  The solid line is a Gaussian profile, while the
596 > dotted line is a Voigt profile, a convolution of a Gaussian and a
597 > Lorentzian.  Since this distribution is a measure of angular error
598 > between two different electrostatic summation methods, there is no
599 > {\it a priori} reason for the profile to adhere to any specific shape.
600 > Gaussian fits was used to compare all the tested methods.  The
601 > variance ($\sigma^2$) was extracted from each of these fits and was
602 > used to compare distribution widths.  Values of $\sigma^2$ near zero
603 > indicate vector directions indistinguishable from those calculated
604 > when using the reference method (SPME).
605  
606 < \subsection{Force Magnitude Comparison}
606 > \subsection{Short-time Dynamics}
607  
608 < While studying the energy differences provides insight into how comparable these methods are energetically, if we want to use these methods in Molecular Dynamics simulations, we also need to consider their effect on forces and torques.  Both the magnitude and the direction of the force and torque vectors of each of the bodies in the system can be compared to those observed while using SPME.  Analysis of the magnitude of these vectors can be performed in the manner described previously for comparing $\Delta E$ values, only instead of a single value between two system configurations, there is a value for each particle in each configuration.  For a system of 1000 water molecules and 40 ions, there are 1040 force vectors and 1000 torque vectors.  With 500 configurations, this results in excess of 500,000 data samples for each system type.  Figures \ref{frcMag} and \ref{trqMag} respectively show the force and torque vector magnitude results for the accumulated analysis over all the system types.
608 > The effects of the alternative electrostatic summation methods on the
609 > short-time dynamics of charged systems were evaluated by considering a
610 > NaCl crystal at a temperature of 1000 K.  A subset of the best
611 > performing pairwise methods was used in this comparison.  The NaCl
612 > crystal was chosen to avoid possible complications from the treatment
613 > of orientational motion in molecular systems.  All systems were
614 > started with the same initial positions and velocities.  Simulations
615 > were performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
616 > autocorrelation functions (Eq. \ref{eq:vCorr}) were computed for each
617 > of the trajectories,
618 > \begin{equation}
619 > C_v(t) = \frac{\langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(t)\rangle}{\langle v_i(0)\cdot v_i(0)\rangle}.
620 > \label{eq:vCorr}
621 > \end{equation}
622 > Velocity autocorrelation functions require detailed short time data,
623 > thus velocity information was saved every 2 fs over 10 ps
624 > trajectories. Because the NaCl crystal is composed of two different
625 > atom types, the average of the two resulting velocity autocorrelation
626 > functions was used for comparisons.
627  
628 + \subsection{Long-Time and Collective Motion}\label{sec:LongTimeMethods}
629 +
630 + The effects of the same subset of alternative electrostatic methods on
631 + the {\it long-time} dynamics of charged systems were evaluated using
632 + the same model system (NaCl crystals at 1000K).  The power spectrum
633 + ($I(\omega)$) was obtained via Fourier transform of the velocity
634 + autocorrelation function, \begin{equation} I(\omega) =
635 + \frac{1}{2\pi}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}C_v(t)e^{-i\omega t}dt,
636 + \label{eq:powerSpec}
637 + \end{equation}
638 + where the frequency, $\omega=0,\ 1,\ ...,\ N-1$. Again, because the
639 + NaCl crystal is composed of two different atom types, the average of
640 + the two resulting power spectra was used for comparisons. Simulations
641 + were performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
642 + information was saved every 5 fs over 100 ps trajectories.
643 +
644 + \subsection{Representative Simulations}\label{sec:RepSims}
645 + A variety of representative simulations were analyzed to determine the
646 + relative effectiveness of the pairwise summation techniques in
647 + reproducing the energetics and dynamics exhibited by SPME.  We wanted
648 + to span the space of modern simulations (i.e. from liquids of neutral
649 + molecules to ionic crystals), so the systems studied were:
650 + \begin{enumerate}
651 + \item liquid water (SPC/E),\cite{Berendsen87}
652 + \item crystalline water (Ice I$_\textrm{c}$ crystals of SPC/E),
653 + \item NaCl crystals,
654 + \item NaCl melts,
655 + \item a low ionic strength solution of NaCl in water (0.11 M),
656 + \item a high ionic strength solution of NaCl in water (1.1 M), and
657 + \item a 6 \AA\  radius sphere of Argon in water.
658 + \end{enumerate}
659 + By utilizing the pairwise techniques (outlined in section
660 + \ref{sec:ESMethods}) in systems composed entirely of neutral groups,
661 + charged particles, and mixtures of the two, we hope to discern under
662 + which conditions it will be possible to use one of the alternative
663 + summation methodologies instead of the Ewald sum.
664 +
665 + For the solid and liquid water configurations, configurations were
666 + taken at regular intervals from high temperature trajectories of 1000
667 + SPC/E water molecules.  Each configuration was equilibrated
668 + independently at a lower temperature (300~K for the liquid, 200~K for
669 + the crystal).  The solid and liquid NaCl systems consisted of 500
670 + $\textrm{Na}^{+}$ and 500 $\textrm{Cl}^{-}$ ions.  Configurations for
671 + these systems were selected and equilibrated in the same manner as the
672 + water systems.  The equilibrated temperatures were 1000~K for the NaCl
673 + crystal and 7000~K for the liquid. The ionic solutions were made by
674 + solvating 4 (or 40) ions in a periodic box containing 1000 SPC/E water
675 + molecules.  Ion and water positions were then randomly swapped, and
676 + the resulting configurations were again equilibrated individually.
677 + Finally, for the Argon / Water ``charge void'' systems, the identities
678 + of all the SPC/E waters within 6 \AA\ of the center of the
679 + equilibrated water configurations were converted to argon
680 + (Fig. \ref{fig:argonSlice}).
681 +
682 + These procedures guaranteed us a set of representative configurations
683 + from chemically-relevant systems sampled from an appropriate
684 + ensemble. Force field parameters for the ions and Argon were taken
685 + from the force field utilized by {\sc oopse}.\cite{Meineke05}
686 +
687   \begin{figure}
688   \centering
689 < \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{./frcMagplot.pdf}
690 < \caption{The results from the statistical analysis of the force vector magnitude results for all the system types at 9 \AA\ (${\bullet}$), 12 \AA\ ($\blacksquare$), and 15 \AA\ ($\blacktriangledown$) cutoff radii.  Results close to a value of 1 (dashed line) indicate force vector magnitude values from that particular method (listed on the left) are nearly indistinguishable from those obtained from SPME.}
691 < \label{frcMag}
689 > \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./slice.pdf}
690 > \caption{A slice from the center of a water box used in a charge void
691 > simulation.  The darkened region represents the boundary sphere within
692 > which the water molecules were converted to argon atoms.}
693 > \label{fig:argonSlice}
694   \end{figure}
695  
696 < The results in figure \ref{frcMag} for the most part parallel those seen in the previous look at the $\Delta E$ results.  The unmodified cutoff results are poor, but using group based cutoffs and a switching function provides a improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta E$.  Looking at the Shifted Potential sets, the slope and R$^2$ improve with the use of damping to an optimal result of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$ for the 12 and 15 \AA\ cutoffs.  Further increases in damping, while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9 \AA\ , is detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.  The undamped Shifted Force method gives forces in line with those obtained using SPME, and use of a damping function gives little to no gain.  The reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor quality of the fits for the $\Delta E$ results.  There is still a considerable degree of scatter in the data, but it correlates well in general.
696 > \subsection{Comparison of Summation Methods}\label{sec:ESMethods}
697 > We compared the following alternative summation methods with results
698 > from the reference method (SPME):
699 > \begin{itemize}
700 > \item {\sc sp} with damping parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2,
701 > and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$,
702 > \item {\sc sf} with damping parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2,
703 > and 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$,
704 > \item reaction field with an infinite dielectric constant, and
705 > \item an unmodified cutoff.
706 > \end{itemize}
707 > Group-based cutoffs with a fifth-order polynomial switching function
708 > were utilized for the reaction field simulations.  Additionally, we
709 > investigated the use of these cutoffs with the SP, SF, and pure
710 > cutoff.  The SPME electrostatics were performed using the TINKER
711 > implementation of SPME,\cite{Ponder87} while all other method
712 > calculations were performed using the OOPSE molecular mechanics
713 > package.\cite{Meineke05} All other portions of the energy calculation
714 > (i.e. Lennard-Jones interactions) were handled in exactly the same
715 > manner across all systems and configurations.
716  
717 < \subsection{Torque Magnitude Comparison}
717 > The althernative methods were also evaluated with three different
718 > cutoff radii (9, 12, and 15 \AA).  As noted previously, the
719 > convergence parameter ($\alpha$) plays a role in the balance of the
720 > real-space and reciprocal-space portions of the Ewald calculation.
721 > Typical molecular mechanics packages set this to a value dependent on
722 > the cutoff radius and a tolerance (typically less than $1 \times
723 > 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller tolerances are typically associated with
724 > increased accuracy at the expense of increased time spent calculating
725 > the reciprocal-space portion of the
726 > summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95} The default TINKER tolerance of $1
727 > \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used in all SPME calculations, resulting
728 > in Ewald Coefficients of 0.4200, 0.3119, and 0.2476 \AA$^{-1}$ for
729 > cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.
730  
731 + \section{Results and Discussion}
732 +
733 + \subsection{Configuration Energy Differences}\label{sec:EnergyResults}
734 + In order to evaluate the performance of the pairwise electrostatic
735 + summation methods for Monte Carlo simulations, the energy differences
736 + between configurations were compared to the values obtained when using
737 + SPME.  The results for the subsequent regression analysis are shown in
738 + figure \ref{fig:delE}.
739 +
740   \begin{figure}
741   \centering
742 < \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{./trqMagplot.pdf}
743 < \caption{The results from the statistical analysis of the torque vector magnitude results for all the system types at 9 \AA\ (${\bullet}$), 12 \AA\ ($\blacksquare$), and 15 \AA\ ($\blacktriangledown$) cutoff radii.  Results close to a value of 1 (dashed line) indicate torque vector magnitude values from that particular method (listed on the left) are nearly indistinguishable from those obtained from SPME.  Torques are only accumulated on the rigid water molecules, so these results exclude NaCl the systems.}
744 < \label{trqMag}
742 > \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./delEplot.pdf}
743 > \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of configurational energy
744 > differences for a given electrostatic method compared with the
745 > reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line)
746 > indicate $\Delta E$ values indistinguishable from those obtained using
747 > SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with
748 > different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ =
749 > inverted triangles).}
750 > \label{fig:delE}
751   \end{figure}
752  
753 < The torque vector magnitude results in figure \ref{trqMag} are similar to those seen for the forces, but more clearly show the improved behavior with increasing cutoff radius.  Moderate damping is beneficial to the Shifted Potential and unnecessary with the Shifted Force method, and they also show that over-damping adversely effects all cutoff radii rather than showing an improvement for systems with short cutoffs.  The reaction field method performs well when calculating the torques, better than the Shifted Force method over this limited data set.
753 > The most striking feature of this plot is how well the Shifted Force
754 > ({\sc sf}) and Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) methods capture the energy
755 > differences.  For the undamped {\sc sf} method, and the
756 > moderately-damped {\sc sp} methods, the results are nearly
757 > indistinguishable from the Ewald results.  The other common methods do
758 > significantly less well.  
759  
760 < \subsection{Force and Torque Direction Comparison}
760 > The unmodified cutoff method is essentially unusable.  This is not
761 > surprising since hard cutoffs give large energy fluctuations as atoms
762 > or molecules move in and out of the cutoff
763 > radius.\cite{Rahman71,Adams79} These fluctuations can be alleviated to
764 > some degree by using group based cutoffs with a switching
765 > function.\cite{Adams79,Steinbach94,Leach01} However, we do not see
766 > significant improvement using the group-switched cutoff because the
767 > salt and salt solution systems contain non-neutral groups.  Interested
768 > readers can consult the accompanying supporting information for a
769 > comparison where all groups are neutral.
770  
771 < Having force and torque vectors with magnitudes that are well correlated to SPME is good, but if they are not pointing in the proper direction the results will be incorrect.  These vector directions were investigated through measurement of the angle formed between them and those from SPME.  The dot product of these unit vectors provides a theta value that is accumulated in a distribution function, weighted by the area on the unit sphere.  Narrow distributions of theta values indicates similar to identical results between the tested method and SPME.  To measure the narrowness of the resulting distributions, non-linear Gaussian fits were performed.
771 > For the {\sc sp} method, inclusion of potential damping improves the
772 > agreement with Ewald, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA $^{-1}$ shows
773 > an excellent correlation and quality of fit with the SPME results,
774 > particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12
775 > \AA .  Use of a larger damping parameter is more helpful for the
776 > shortest cutoff shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations
777 > with larger cutoffs.  
778  
779 + In the {\sc sf} sets, increasing damping results in progressively
780 + worse correlation with Ewald.  Overall, the undamped case is the best
781 + performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are
782 + consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  The undamped
783 + case is also less computationally demanding (because no evaluation of
784 + the complementary error function is required).
785 +
786 + The reaction field results illustrates some of that method's
787 + limitations, primarily that it was developed for use in homogenous
788 + systems; although it does provide results that are an improvement over
789 + those from an unmodified cutoff.
790 +
791 + \subsection{Magnitudes of the Force and Torque Vectors}
792 +
793 + Evaluation of pairwise methods for use in Molecular Dynamics
794 + simulations requires consideration of effects on the forces and
795 + torques.  Investigation of the force and torque vector magnitudes
796 + provides a measure of the strength of these values relative to SPME.
797 + Figures \ref{fig:frcMag} and \ref{fig:trqMag} respectively show the
798 + force and torque vector magnitude regression results for the
799 + accumulated analysis over all the system types.
800 +
801   \begin{figure}
802   \centering
803 < \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{./gaussFit.pdf}
804 < \caption{Example fitting of the angular distribution of the force vectors over all of the studied systems.  The solid and dotted lines show Gaussian and Voigt fits of the distribution data respectively.  Even though the Voigt profile make for a more accurate fit, the Gaussian was used due to more versatile statistical results.}
805 < \label{gaussian}
803 > \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./frcMagplot.pdf}
804 > \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the force vector magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line) indicate force magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
805 > \label{fig:frcMag}
806   \end{figure}
807  
808 < Figure \ref{gaussian} shows an example distribution and the non-linear fit applied.  The solid line is a Gaussian profile, while the dotted line is a Voigt profile, a convolution of a Gaussian and a Lorentzian profile.  Since this distribution is a measure of angular error between two different electrostatic summation methods, there is particular reason for it to adhere to a particular shape.  Because of this and the Gaussian profile's more statistically meaningful properties, Gaussian fitting was used to compare all the methods considered in this study.  The results (Fig. \ref{frcTrqAng}) are compared through the variance ($\sigma^2$) of these non-linear fits.  
808 > Figure \ref{fig:frcMag}, for the most part, parallels the results seen
809 > in the previous $\Delta E$ section.  The unmodified cutoff results are
810 > poor, but using group based cutoffs and a switching function provides
811 > a improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta
812 > E$.  Looking at the {\sc sp} sets, the slope and $R^2$
813 > improve with the use of damping to an optimal result of 0.2 \AA
814 > $^{-1}$ for the 12 and 15 \AA\ cutoffs.  Further increases in damping,
815 > while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9 \AA\ , is
816 > detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.  The undamped
817 > {\sc sf} method gives forces in line with those obtained using
818 > SPME, and use of a damping function results in minor improvement.  The
819 > reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor
820 > quality of the fits for the $\Delta E$ results.  There is still a
821 > considerable degree of scatter in the data, but it correlates well in
822 > general.  To be fair, we again note that the reaction field
823 > calculations do not encompass NaCl crystal and melt systems, so these
824 > results are partly biased towards conditions in which the method
825 > performs more favorably.
826  
827   \begin{figure}
828   \centering
829 < \includegraphics[width=3.25in]{./frcTrqAngplot.pdf}
830 < \caption{The results from the statistical analysis of the force and torque vector angular distributions for all the system types at 9 \AA\ (${\bullet}$), 12 \AA\ ($\blacksquare$), and 15 \AA\ ($\blacktriangledown$) cutoff radii.  Plotted values are the variance ($\sigma^2$) of the Gaussian non-linear fits.  Results close to a value of 0 (dashed line) indicate force or torque vector directions from that particular method (listed on the left) are nearly indistinguishable from those obtained from SPME.  Torques are only accumulated on the rigid water molecules, so the torque vector angle results exclude NaCl the systems.}
831 < \label{frcTrqAng}
829 > \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./trqMagplot.pdf}
830 > \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the torque vector magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line) indicate torque magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
831 > \label{fig:trqMag}
832   \end{figure}
833  
834 < Both the force and torque $\sigma^2$ results from the analysis of the total accumulated system data are tabulated in figure \ref{frcTrqAng}.  All of the sets, aside from the over-damped case show the improvement afforded by choosing a longer simulation cutoff.  Increasing the cutoff from 9 to 12 \AA\ typically results in a halving of $\sigma^2$, with a similar improvement going from 12 to 15 \AA .  The undamped Shifted Force, Group Based Cutoff, and Reaction Field methods all do equivalently well at capturing the direction of both the force and torque vectors.  Using damping improves the angular behavior significantly for the Shifted Potential and moderately for the Shifted Force methods.  Increasing the damping too far is destructive for both methods, particularly to the torque vectors.  Again it is important to recognize that the force vectors cover all particles in the systems, while torque vectors are only available for neutral molecular groups.  Damping appears to have a more beneficial non-neutral bodies, and this observation is investigated further in the accompanying supporting information.  
834 > To evaluate the torque vector magnitudes, the data set from which
835 > values are drawn is limited to rigid molecules in the systems
836 > (i.e. water molecules).  In spite of this smaller sampling pool, the
837 > torque vector magnitude results in figure \ref{fig:trqMag} are still
838 > similar to those seen for the forces; however, they more clearly show
839 > the improved behavior that comes with increasing the cutoff radius.
840 > Moderate damping is beneficial to the {\sc sp} and helpful
841 > yet possibly unnecessary with the {\sc sf} method, and they also
842 > show that over-damping adversely effects all cutoff radii rather than
843 > showing an improvement for systems with short cutoffs.  The reaction
844 > field method performs well when calculating the torques, better than
845 > the Shifted Force method over this limited data set.
846  
847 + \subsection{Directionality of the Force and Torque Vectors}
848 +
849 + Having force and torque vectors with magnitudes that are well
850 + correlated to SPME is good, but if they are not pointing in the proper
851 + direction the results will be incorrect.  These vector directions were
852 + investigated through measurement of the angle formed between them and
853 + those from SPME.  The results (Fig. \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}) are compared
854 + through the variance ($\sigma^2$) of the Gaussian fits of the angle
855 + error distributions of the combined set over all system types.
856 +
857 + \begin{figure}
858 + \centering
859 + \includegraphics[width=5.5in]{./frcTrqAngplot.pdf}
860 + \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the Gaussian fit of the force and torque vector angular distributions for a given electrostatic method compared with the reference Ewald sum.  Results with a variance ($\sigma^2$) equal to zero (dashed line) indicate force and torque directions indistinguishable from those obtained using SPME.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
861 + \label{fig:frcTrqAng}
862 + \end{figure}
863 +
864 + Both the force and torque $\sigma^2$ results from the analysis of the
865 + total accumulated system data are tabulated in figure
866 + \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}.  All of the sets, aside from the over-damped case
867 + show the improvement afforded by choosing a longer simulation cutoff.
868 + Increasing the cutoff from 9 to 12 \AA\ typically results in a halving
869 + of the distribution widths, with a similar improvement going from 12
870 + to 15 \AA .  The undamped {\sc sf}, Group Based Cutoff, and
871 + Reaction Field methods all do equivalently well at capturing the
872 + direction of both the force and torque vectors.  Using damping
873 + improves the angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp}
874 + and moderately for the {\sc sf} methods.  Increasing the damping
875 + too far is destructive for both methods, particularly to the torque
876 + vectors.  Again it is important to recognize that the force vectors
877 + cover all particles in the systems, while torque vectors are only
878 + available for neutral molecular groups.  Damping appears to have a
879 + more beneficial effect on non-neutral bodies, and this observation is
880 + investigated further in the accompanying supporting information.
881 +
882   \begin{table}[htbp]
883     \centering
884     \caption{Variance ($\sigma^2$) of the force (top set) and torque (bottom set) vector angle difference distributions for the Shifted Potential and Shifted Force methods.  Calculations were performed both with (Y) and without (N) group based cutoffs and a switching function.  The $\alpha$ values have units of \AA$^{-1}$ and the variance values have units of degrees$^2$.}  
# Line 173 | Line 909 | Both the force and torque $\sigma^2$ results from the
909  
910        \bottomrule
911     \end{tabular}
912 <   \label{groupAngle}
912 >   \label{tab:groupAngle}
913   \end{table}
914  
915 < Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied to both the Shifted Potential and Force methods.  Use off a switching function corrects for the discontinuities that arise when atoms of a group exit the cutoff before the group's center of mass.  Though there are no significant benefit or drawbacks observed in $\Delta E$ and vector magnitude results when doing this, there is a measurable improvement in the vector angle results.  Table \ref{groupAngle} shows the angular variance values obtained using group based cutoffs and a switching function alongside the standard results seen in figure \ref{frcTrqAng} for comparison purposes.  The Shifted Potential shows much narrower angular distributions for both the force and torque vectors when using an $\alpha$ of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while Shifted Force shows improvements in the undamped and lightly damped cases.  Thus, by calculating the electrostatic interactions in terms of molecular pairs rather than atomic pairs, the direction of the force and torque vectors are determined more accurately.  
915 > Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
916 > to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  Use off a
917 > switching function corrects for the discontinuities that arise when
918 > atoms of a group exit the cutoff before the group's center of mass.
919 > Though there are no significant benefit or drawbacks observed in
920 > $\Delta E$ and vector magnitude results when doing this, there is a
921 > measurable improvement in the vector angle results.  Table
922 > \ref{tab:groupAngle} shows the angular variance values obtained using
923 > group based cutoffs and a switching function alongside the standard
924 > results seen in figure \ref{fig:frcTrqAng} for comparison purposes.
925 > The {\sc sp} shows much narrower angular distributions for
926 > both the force and torque vectors when using an $\alpha$ of 0.2
927 > \AA$^{-1}$ or less, while {\sc sf} shows improvements in the
928 > undamped and lightly damped cases.  Thus, by calculating the
929 > electrostatic interactions in terms of molecular pairs rather than
930 > atomic pairs, the direction of the force and torque vectors are
931 > determined more accurately.
932  
933 < One additional trend to recognize in table \ref{groupAngle} is that the $\sigma^2$ values for both Shifted Potential and Shifted Force converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier to see when using group based cutoffs.  Looking back on figures \ref{delE}, \ref{frcMag}, and \ref{trqMag}, show this behavior clearly at large $\alpha$ and cutoff values.  The reason for this is that the complimentary error function inserted into the potential weakens the electrostatic interaction as $\alpha$ increases.  Thus, at larger values of $\alpha$, both the summation method types progress toward non-interacting functions, so care is required in choosing large damping functions lest one generate an undesirable loss in the pair interaction.  Kast \textit{et al.}  developed a method for choosing appropriate $\alpha$ values for these types of electrostatic summation methods by fitting to $g(r)$ data, and their methods indicate optimal values of 0.34, 0.25, and 0.16 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff values of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.\cite{Kast03}  These appear to be reasonable choices to obtain proper MC behavior (Fig. \ref{delE}); however, based on these findings, choices this high would be introducing error in the molecular torques, particularly for the shorter cutoffs.  Based on the above findings, any empirical damping is arguably unnecessary with the choice of the Shifted Force method.
933 > One additional trend to recognize in table \ref{tab:groupAngle} is
934 > that the $\sigma^2$ values for both {\sc sp} and
935 > {\sc sf} converge as $\alpha$ increases, something that is easier
936 > to see when using group based cutoffs.  Looking back on figures
937 > \ref{fig:delE}, \ref{fig:frcMag}, and \ref{fig:trqMag}, show this
938 > behavior clearly at large $\alpha$ and cutoff values.  The reason for
939 > this is that the complimentary error function inserted into the
940 > potential weakens the electrostatic interaction as $\alpha$ increases.
941 > Thus, at larger values of $\alpha$, both the summation method types
942 > progress toward non-interacting functions, so care is required in
943 > choosing large damping functions lest one generate an undesirable loss
944 > in the pair interaction.  Kast \textit{et al.}  developed a method for
945 > choosing appropriate $\alpha$ values for these types of electrostatic
946 > summation methods by fitting to $g(r)$ data, and their methods
947 > indicate optimal values of 0.34, 0.25, and 0.16 \AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff
948 > values of 9, 12, and 15 \AA\ respectively.\cite{Kast03} These appear
949 > to be reasonable choices to obtain proper MC behavior
950 > (Fig. \ref{fig:delE}); however, based on these findings, choices this
951 > high would introduce error in the molecular torques, particularly for
952 > the shorter cutoffs.  Based on the above findings, empirical damping
953 > up to 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$ proves to be beneficial, but damping is arguably
954 > unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
955  
956 + \subsection{Short-Time Dynamics: Velocity Autocorrelation Functions of NaCl Crystals}
957 +
958 + In the previous studies using a {\sc sf} variant of the damped
959 + Wolf coulomb potential, the structure and dynamics of water were
960 + investigated rather extensively.\cite{Zahn02,Kast03} Their results
961 + indicated that the damped {\sc sf} method results in properties
962 + very similar to those obtained when using the Ewald summation.
963 + Considering the statistical results shown above, the good performance
964 + of this method is not that surprising.  Rather than consider the same
965 + systems and simply recapitulate their results, we decided to look at
966 + the solid state dynamical behavior obtained using the best performing
967 + summation methods from the above results.
968 +
969 + \begin{figure}
970 + \centering
971 + \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./vCorrPlot.pdf}
972 + \caption{Velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0.0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2). The inset is a magnification of the first trough. The times to first collision are nearly identical, but the differences can be seen in the peaks and troughs, where the undamped to weakly damped methods are stiffer than the moderately damped and SPME methods.}
973 + \label{fig:vCorrPlot}
974 + \end{figure}
975 +
976 + The short-time decays through the first collision are nearly identical
977 + in figure \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}, but the peaks and troughs of the
978 + functions show how the methods differ.  The undamped {\sc sf} method
979 + has deeper troughs (see inset in Fig. \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}) and higher
980 + peaks than any of the other methods.  As the damping function is
981 + increased, these peaks are smoothed out, and approach the SPME
982 + curve. The damping acts as a distance dependent Gaussian screening of
983 + the point charges for the pairwise summation methods; thus, the
984 + collisions are more elastic in the undamped {\sc sf} potential, and the
985 + stiffness of the potential is diminished as the electrostatic
986 + interactions are softened by the damping function.  With $\alpha$
987 + values of 0.2 \AA$^{-1}$, the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} functions are
988 + nearly identical and track the SPME features quite well.  This is not
989 + too surprising in that the differences between the {\sc sf} and {\sc
990 + sp} potentials are mitigated with increased damping.  However, this
991 + appears to indicate that once damping is utilized, the form of the
992 + potential seems to play a lesser role in the crystal dynamics.
993 +
994 + \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
995 +
996 + The short time dynamics were extended to evaluate how the differences
997 + between the methods affect the collective long-time motion.  The same
998 + electrostatic summation methods were used as in the short time
999 + velocity autocorrelation function evaluation, but the trajectories
1000 + were sampled over a much longer time. The power spectra of the
1001 + resulting velocity autocorrelation functions were calculated and are
1002 + displayed in figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.
1003 +
1004 + \begin{figure}
1005 + \centering
1006 + \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./spectraSquare.pdf}
1007 + \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation functions of NaCl crystals at 1000 K while using SPME, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  Apodization of the correlation functions via a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to clear up the spectral noise resulting from data truncation, and had no noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.  The inset shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the spectra begin to differ.}
1008 + \label{fig:methodPS}
1009 + \end{figure}
1010 +
1011 + While high frequency peaks of the spectra in this figure overlap,
1012 + showing the same general features, the low frequency region shows how
1013 + the summation methods differ.  Considering the low-frequency inset
1014 + (expanded in the upper frame of figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at
1015 + frequencies below 100 cm$^{-1}$, the correlated motions are
1016 + blue-shifted when using undamped or weakly damped {\sc sf}.  When
1017 + using moderate damping ($\alpha = 0.2$ \AA$^{-1}$) both the {\sc sf}
1018 + and {\sc sp} methods give near identical correlated motion behavior as
1019 + the Ewald method (which has a damping value of 0.3119).  This
1020 + weakening of the electrostatic interaction with increased damping
1021 + explains why the long-ranged correlated motions are at lower
1022 + frequencies for the moderately damped methods than for undamped or
1023 + weakly damped methods.  To see this effect more clearly, we show how
1024 + damping strength alone affects a simple real-space electrostatic
1025 + potential,
1026 + \begin{equation}
1027 + V_\textrm{damped}=\sum^N_i\sum^N_{j\ne i}q_iq_j\left[\frac{\textrm{erfc}({\alpha r})}{r}\right]S(r),
1028 + \end{equation}
1029 + where $S(r)$ is a switching function that smoothly zeroes the
1030 + potential at the cutoff radius.  Figure \ref{fig:dampInc} shows how
1031 + the low frequency motions are dependent on the damping used in the
1032 + direct electrostatic sum.  As the damping increases, the peaks drop to
1033 + lower frequencies.  Incidentally, use of an $\alpha$ of 0.25
1034 + \AA$^{-1}$ on a simple electrostatic summation results in low
1035 + frequency correlated dynamics equivalent to a simulation using SPME.
1036 + When the coefficient lowers to 0.15 \AA$^{-1}$ and below, these peaks
1037 + shift to higher frequency in exponential fashion.  Though not shown,
1038 + the spectrum for the simple undamped electrostatic potential is
1039 + blue-shifted such that the lowest frequency peak resides near 325
1040 + cm$^{-1}$.  In light of these results, the undamped {\sc sf} method
1041 + producing low-lying motion peaks within 10 cm$^{-1}$ of SPME is quite
1042 + respectable and shows that the shifted force procedure accounts for
1043 + most of the effect afforded through use of the Ewald summation.
1044 + However, it appears as though moderate damping is required for
1045 + accurate reproduction of crystal dynamics.
1046 + \begin{figure}
1047 + \centering
1048 + \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./comboSquare.pdf}
1049 + \caption{Regions of spectra showing the low-frequency correlated motions for NaCl crystals at 1000 K using various electrostatic summation methods.  The upper plot is a zoomed inset from figure \ref{fig:methodPS}.  As the damping value for the {\sc sf} potential increases, the low-frequency peaks red-shift.  The lower plot is of spectra when using SPME and a simple damped Coulombic sum with damping coefficients ($\alpha$) ranging from 0.15 to 0.3 \AA$^{-1}$.  As $\alpha$ increases, the peaks are red-shifted toward and eventually beyond the values given by SPME.  The larger $\alpha$ values weaken the real-space electrostatics, explaining this shift towards less strongly correlated motions in the crystal.}
1050 + \label{fig:dampInc}
1051 + \end{figure}
1052 +
1053   \section{Conclusions}
1054  
1055 < \section{Acknowledgments}
1055 > This investigation of pairwise electrostatic summation techniques
1056 > shows that there are viable and more computationally efficient
1057 > electrostatic summation techniques than the Ewald summation, chiefly
1058 > methods derived from the damped Coulombic sum originally proposed by
1059 > Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99,Zahn02} In particular, the
1060 > {\sc sf} method, reformulated above as eq. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}),
1061 > shows a remarkable ability to reproduce the energetic and dynamic
1062 > characteristics exhibited by simulations employing lattice summation
1063 > techniques.  The cumulative energy difference results showed the
1064 > undamped {\sc sf} and moderately damped {\sc sp} methods
1065 > produced results nearly identical to SPME.  Similarly for the dynamic
1066 > features, the undamped or moderately damped {\sc sf} and
1067 > moderately damped {\sc sp} methods produce force and torque
1068 > vector magnitude and directions very similar to the expected values.
1069 > These results translate into long-time dynamic behavior equivalent to
1070 > that produced in simulations using SPME.
1071  
1072 + Aside from the computational cost benefit, these techniques have
1073 + applicability in situations where the use of the Ewald sum can prove
1074 + problematic.  Primary among them is their use in interfacial systems,
1075 + where the unmodified lattice sum techniques artificially accentuate
1076 + the periodicity of the system in an undesirable manner.  There have
1077 + been alterations to the standard Ewald techniques, via corrections and
1078 + reformulations, to compensate for these systems; but the pairwise
1079 + techniques discussed here require no modifications, making them
1080 + natural tools to tackle these problems.  Additionally, this
1081 + transferability gives them benefits over other pairwise methods, like
1082 + reaction field, because estimations of physical properties (e.g. the
1083 + dielectric constant) are unnecessary.
1084 +
1085 + We are not suggesting any flaw with the Ewald sum; in fact, it is the
1086 + standard by which these simple pairwise sums are judged.  However,
1087 + these results do suggest that in the typical simulations performed
1088 + today, the Ewald summation may no longer be required to obtain the
1089 + level of accuracy most researchers have come to expect
1090 +
1091 + \section{Acknowledgments}
1092   \newpage
1093  
1094 < \bibliographystyle{achemso}
1094 > \bibliographystyle{jcp2}
1095   \bibliography{electrostaticMethods}
1096  
1097  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines