ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex (file contents):
Revision 2742 by chrisfen, Wed Apr 26 17:41:25 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2744 by gezelter, Tue May 2 13:11:41 2006 UTC

# Line 28 | Line 28
28   \renewcommand\caption[1]{%
29          \Caption[#1]{}%
30   }
31 + \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{1.2in}
32 + \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{1.2in}
33  
32
34   \begin{document}
35  
36   \title{Is the Ewald summation still necessary? \\
37 < Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for
38 < long-range electrostatics in molecular simulations}
37 > Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard \\
38 > for long-range electrostatics}
39  
40   \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail:
41   gezelter@nd.edu} \\
# Line 59 | Line 60 | variety of simulation types.
60   techniques.  Comparisons were performed with this and other pairwise
61   methods against the smooth particle mesh Ewald ({\sc spme}) summation
62   to see how well they reproduce the energetics and dynamics of a
63 < variety of simulation types.
63 > variety of molecular simulations.
64   \end{abstract}
65  
66   \newpage
# Line 207 | Line 208 | can prove problematic.  The Ewald sum has been reformu
208   conditions. However, in certain systems, such as vapor-liquid
209   interfaces and membranes, the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity
210   can prove problematic.  The Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
211 < 2D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89}, but the
212 < new methods are computationally expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} More
211 > 2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} but these
212 > methods are computationally expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} More
213   recently, there have been several successful efforts toward reducing
214 < the computational cost of 2D lattice summations, often enabling the
215 < use of the mentioned
216 < optimizations.\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04}
214 > the computational cost of 2-D lattice
215 > summations,\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04}
216 > bringing them more in line with the cost of the full 3-D summation.
217  
218 +
219   Several studies have recognized that the inherent periodicity in the
220   Ewald sum can also have an effect on three-dimensional
221   systems.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines