--- trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex	2006/03/21 15:46:55	2651
+++ trunk/electrostaticMethodsPaper/electrostaticMethods.tex	2006/03/21 19:26:59	2652
@@ -577,8 +577,11 @@ accumulated in a distribution function and weighted by
 where $\hat{f}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the force
 vector computed using method M.  Each of these $\theta$ values was
 accumulated in a distribution function and weighted by the area on the
-unit sphere.  Non-linear Gaussian fits were used to measure the width
-of the resulting distributions.
+unit sphere.  Since this distribution is a measure of angular error
+between two different electrostatic summation methods, there is no
+{\it a priori} reason for the profile to adhere to any specific
+shape. Thus, gaussian fits were used to measure the width of the
+resulting distributions.
 %
 %\begin{figure}
 %\centering