ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/fennellDissertation/dissertation.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/fennellDissertation/dissertation.tex (file contents):
Revision 2956 by chrisfen, Sat Jul 8 13:13:27 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2957 by chrisfen, Fri Jul 21 22:18:24 2006 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[12pt]{ndthesis}
1 > \documentclass[11pt]{ndthesis}
2  
3   % some packages for things like equations and graphics
4   \usepackage{amsmath,bm}
# Line 7 | Line 7
7   \usepackage{tabularx}
8   \usepackage{graphicx}
9   \usepackage{booktabs}
10 + \usepackage{cite}
11  
12   \begin{document}
13  
# Line 286 | Line 287 | properties obtained using the Ewald sum.
287   structural and dynamic properties of water compared the same
288   properties obtained using the Ewald sum.
289  
290 < \section{Simple Forms for Pairwise Electrostatics}
290 > \section{Simple Forms for Pairwise Electrostatics}\label{sec:PairwiseDerivation}
291  
292   The potentials proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.} and Zahn \textit{et
293   al.} are constructed using two different (and separable) computational
# Line 776 | Line 777 | limitations, primarily that it was developed for use i
777   the complementary error function is required).
778  
779   The reaction field results illustrates some of that method's
780 < limitations, primarily that it was developed for use in homogenous
780 > limitations, primarily that it was developed for use in homogeneous
781   systems; although it does provide results that are an improvement over
782   those from an unmodified cutoff.
783  
# Line 901 | Line 902 | angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp} and mo
902   all do equivalently well at capturing the direction of both the force
903   and torque vectors.  Using the electrostatic damping improves the
904   angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp} and moderately for the
905 < {\sc sf} methods.  Overdamping is detrimental to both methods.  Again
905 > {\sc sf} methods.  Over-damping is detrimental to both methods.  Again
906   it is important to recognize that the force vectors cover all
907   particles in all seven systems, while torque vectors are only
908   available for neutral molecular groups.  Damping is more beneficial to
909   charged bodies, and this observation is investigated further in
910 < section \ref{IndividualResults}.
910 > section \ref{sec:IndividualResults}.
911  
912   Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
913   to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  The group-based cutoffs
# Line 971 | Line 972 | However, at larger values of $\alpha$, it is possible
972   increases, something that is more obvious with group-based cutoffs.
973   The complimentary error function inserted into the potential weakens
974   the electrostatic interaction as the value of $\alpha$ is increased.
975 < However, at larger values of $\alpha$, it is possible to overdamp the
975 > However, at larger values of $\alpha$, it is possible to over-damp the
976   electrostatic interaction and to remove it completely.  Kast
977   \textit{et al.}  developed a method for choosing appropriate $\alpha$
978   values for these types of electrostatic summation methods by fitting
# Line 1121 | Line 1122 | with cutoff radii greater than 12\AA. Overdamping the
1122   agreement with {\sc spme} in both energetic and dynamic behavior when
1123   using the {\sc sf} method with and without damping. The {\sc sp}
1124   method does well with an $\alpha$ around 0.2\AA$^{-1}$, particularly
1125 < with cutoff radii greater than 12\AA. Overdamping the electrostatics
1125 > with cutoff radii greater than 12\AA. Over-damping the electrostatics
1126   reduces the agreement between both these methods and {\sc spme}.
1127  
1128   The pure cutoff ({\sc pc}) method performs poorly, again mirroring the
# Line 1154 | Line 1155 | ranges of interest.  When overdamping these methods, g
1155   no damping and only modest improvement for the recommended conditions
1156   ($\alpha = 0.2$\AA$^{-1}$ and $R_\textrm{c}~\geqslant~12$\AA).  The
1157   {\sc sf} method shows modest narrowing across all damping and cutoff
1158 < ranges of interest.  When overdamping these methods, group cutoffs and
1158 > ranges of interest.  When over-damping these methods, group cutoffs and
1159   the switching function do not improve the force and torque
1160   directionalities.
1161  
# Line 1833 | Line 1834 | have aggrements similar to those observed in section
1834  
1835   This system does not appear to show any significant deviations from
1836   the previously observed results. The {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods
1837 < have aggrements similar to those observed in section
1837 > have agreements similar to those observed in section
1838   \ref{sec:WaterResults}. The only significant difference is the
1839   improvement in the configuration energy differences for the {\sc rf}
1840   method. This is surprising in that we are introducing an inhomogeneity
# Line 1953 | Line 1954 | with the power spectrum obtained using the Ewald sum.
1954   the NaCl crystal at 1000K.  The undamped shifted force ({\sc sf})
1955   method is off by less than 10 cm$^{-1}$, and increasing the
1956   electrostatic damping to 0.25\AA$^{-1}$ gives quantitative agreement
1957 < with the power spectrum obtained using the Ewald sum.  Overdamping can
1957 > with the power spectrum obtained using the Ewald sum.  Over-damping can
1958   result in underestimates of frequencies of the long-wavelength
1959   motions.}
1960   \label{fig:dampInc}
1961   \end{figure}
1962  
1963 < \section{Synopsis of the Pairwise Method Evaluation}\label{sec:PairwiseSynopsis}
1963 > \section{An Application: TIP5P-E Water}\label{sec:t5peApplied}
1964 >
1965 > The above sections focused on the energetics and dynamics of a variety
1966 > of systems when utilizing the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} pairwise
1967 > techniques.  A unitary correlation with results obtained using the
1968 > Ewald summation should result in a successful reproduction of both the
1969 > static and dynamic properties of any selected system.  To test this,
1970 > we decided to calculate a series of properties for the TIP5P-E water
1971 > model when using the {\sc sf} technique.
1972 >
1973 > The TIP5P-E water model is a variant of Mahoney and Jorgensen's
1974 > five-point transferable intermolecular potential (TIP5P) model for
1975 > water.\cite{Mahoney00} TIP5P was developed to reproduce the density
1976 > maximum anomaly present in liquid water near 4$^\circ$C. As with many
1977 > previous point charge water models (such as ST2, TIP3P, TIP4P, SPC,
1978 > and SPC/E), TIP5P was parametrized using a simple cutoff with no
1979 > long-range electrostatic
1980 > correction.\cite{Stillinger74,Jorgensen83,Berendsen81,Berendsen87}
1981 > Without this correction, the pressure term on the central particle
1982 > from the surroundings is missing. Because they expand to compensate
1983 > for this added pressure term when this correction is included, systems
1984 > composed of these particles tend to underpredict the density of water
1985 > under standard conditions. When using any form of long-range
1986 > electrostatic correction, it has become common practice to develop or
1987 > utilize a reparametrized water model that corrects for this
1988 > effect.\cite{vanderSpoel98,Fennell04,Horn04} The TIP5P-E model follows
1989 > this practice and was optimized specifically for use with the Ewald
1990 > summation.\cite{Rick04} In his publication, Rick preserved the
1991 > geometry and point charge magnitudes in TIP5P and focused on altering
1992 > the Lennard-Jones parameters to correct the density at
1993 > 298K.\cite{Rick04} With the density corrected, he compared common
1994 > water properties for TIP5P-E using the Ewald sum with TIP5P using a
1995 > 9\AA\ cutoff.
1996 >
1997 > In the following sections, we compared these same water properties
1998 > calculated from TIP5P-E using the Ewald sum with TIP5P-E using the
1999 > {\sc sf} technique.  In the above evaluation of the pairwise
2000 > techniques, we observed some flexibility in the choice of parameters.
2001 > Because of this, the following comparisons include the {\sc sf}
2002 > technique with a 12\AA\ cutoff and an $\alpha$ = 0.0, 0.1, and
2003 > 0.2\AA$^{-1}$, as well as a 9\AA\ cutoff with an $\alpha$ =
2004 > 0.2\AA$^{-1}$.
2005 >
2006 > \subsection{Density}\label{sec:t5peDensity}
2007 >
2008 > As stated previously, the property that prompted the development of
2009 > TIP5P-E was the density at 1 atm.  The density depends upon the
2010 > internal pressure of the system in the $NPT$ ensemble, and the
2011 > calculation of the pressure includes a components from both the
2012 > kinetic energy and the virial. More specifically, the instantaneous
2013 > molecular pressure ($P(t)$) is given by
2014 > \begin{equation}
2015 > P(t) =  \frac{1}{\textrm{d}V}\sum_\mu
2016 >        \left[\frac{\mathbf{P}_{\mu}^2}{M_{\mu}}
2017 >        + \mathbf{R}_{\mu}\cdot\sum_i\mathbf{F}_{\mu i}\right],
2018 > \label{eq:MolecularPressure}
2019 > \end{equation}
2020 > where $V$ is the volume, $\mathbf{P}_{\mu}$ is the momentum of
2021 > molecule $\mu$, $\mathbf{R}_\mu$ is the position of the center of mass
2022 > ($M_\mu$) of molecule $\mu$, and $\mathbf{F}_{\mu i}$ is the force on
2023 > atom $i$ of molecule $\mu$.\cite{Melchionna93} The virial term (the
2024 > right term in the brackets of eq. \ref{eq:MolecularPressure}) is
2025 > directly dependent on the interatomic forces.  Since the {\sc sp}
2026 > method does not modify the forces (see
2027 > sec. \ref{sec:PairwiseDerivation}), the pressure using {\sc sp} will
2028 > be identical to that obtained without an electrostatic correction.
2029 > The {\sc sf} method does alter the virial component and, by way of the
2030 > modified pressures, should provide densities more in line with those
2031 > obtained using the Ewald summation.
2032 >
2033 > To compare densities, $NPT$ simulations were performed with the same
2034 > temperatures as those selected by Rick in his Ewald summation
2035 > simulations.\cite{Rick04} In order to improve statistics around the
2036 > density maximum, 3ns trajectories were accumulated at 0, 12.5, and
2037 > 25$^\circ$C, while 2ns trajectories were obtained at all other
2038 > temperatures. The average densities were calculated from the later
2039 > three-fourths of each trajectory. Similar to Mahoney and Jorgensen's
2040 > method for accumulating statistics, these sequences were spliced into
2041 > 200 segments to calculate the average density and standard deviation
2042 > at each temperature.\cite{Mahoney00}
2043 >
2044 > \begin{figure}
2045 > \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/tip5peDensities.pdf}
2046 > \caption{Density versus temperature for the TIP5P-E water model when
2047 > using the Ewald summation (Ref. \cite{Rick04}) and the {\sc sf} method
2048 > with various parameters. The pressure term from the image-charge shell
2049 > is larger than that provided by the reciprocal-space portion of the
2050 > Ewald summation, leading to slightly lower densities. This effect is
2051 > more visible with the 9\AA\ cutoff, where the image charges exert a
2052 > greater force on the central particle. The error bars for the {\sc sf}
2053 > methods show plus or minus the standard deviation of the density
2054 > measurement at each temperature.}
2055 > \label{fig:t5peDensities}
2056 > \end{figure}
2057  
2058 + Figure \ref{fig:t5peDensities} shows the densities calculated for
2059 + TIP5P-E using differing electrostatic corrections overlaid on the
2060 + experimental values.\cite{CRC80} The densities when using the {\sc sf}
2061 + technique are close to, though typically lower than, those calculated
2062 + while using the Ewald summation. These slightly reduced densities
2063 + indicate that the pressure component from the image charges at
2064 + R$_\textrm{c}$ is larger than that exerted by the reciprocal-space
2065 + portion of the Ewald summation. Bringing the image charges closer to
2066 + the central particle by choosing a 9\AA\ R$_\textrm{c}$ (rather than
2067 + the preferred 12\AA\ R$_\textrm{c}$) increases the strength of their
2068 + interactions, resulting in a further reduction of the densities.
2069 +
2070 + Because the strength of the image charge interactions has a noticable
2071 + effect on the density, we would expect the use of electrostatic
2072 + damping to also play a role in these calculations. Larger values of
2073 + $\alpha$ weaken the pair-interactions; and since electrostatic damping
2074 + is distance-dependent, force components from the image charges will be
2075 + reduced more than those from particles close the the central
2076 + charge. This effect is visible in figure \ref{fig:t5peDensities} with
2077 + the damped {\sc sf} sums showing slightly higher densities; however,
2078 + it is apparent that the choice of cutoff radius plays a much more
2079 + important role in the resulting densities.
2080 +
2081 + As a final note, all of the above density calculations were performed
2082 + with systems of 512 water molecules. Rick observed a system sized
2083 + dependence of the computed densities when using the Ewald summation,
2084 + most likely due to his tying of the convergence parameter to the box
2085 + dimensions.\cite{Rick04} For systems of 256 water molecules, the
2086 + calculated densities were on average 0.002 to 0.003 g/cm$^3$ lower. A
2087 + system size of 256 molecules would force the use of a shorter
2088 + R$_\textrm{c}$ when using the {\sc sf} technique, and this would also
2089 + lower the densities. Moving to larger systems, as long as the
2090 + R$_\textrm{c}$ remains at a fixed value, we would expect the densities
2091 + to remain constant.
2092 +
2093 + \subsection{Liquid Structure}\label{sec:t5peLiqStructure}
2094 +
2095 + A common function considered when developing and comparing water
2096 + models is the oxygen-oxygen radial distribution function
2097 + ($g_\textrm{OO}(r)$). The $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ is the probability of
2098 + finding a pair of oxygen atoms some distance ($r$) apart relative to a
2099 + random distribution at the same density.\cite{Allen87} It is
2100 + calculated via
2101 + \begin{equation}
2102 + g_\textrm{OO}(r) = \frac{V}{N^2}\left\langle\sum_i\sum_{j\ne i}
2103 +        \delta(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}_{ij})\right\rangle,
2104 + \label{eq:GOOofR}
2105 + \end{equation}
2106 + where the double sum is over all $i$ and $j$ pairs of $N$ oxygen
2107 + atoms. The $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ can be directly compared to X-ray or
2108 + neutron scattering experiments through the oxygen-oxygen structure
2109 + factor ($S_\textrm{OO}(k)$) by the following relationship:
2110 + \begin{equation}
2111 + S_\textrm{OO}(k) = 1 + 4\pi\rho
2112 +        \int_0^\infty r^2\frac{\sin kr}{kr}g_\textrm{OO}(r)\textrm{d}r.
2113 + \label{eq:SOOofK}
2114 + \end{equation}
2115 + Thus, $S_\textrm{OO}(k)$ is related to the Fourier transform of
2116 + $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$.
2117 +
2118 + The expermentally determined $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ for liquid water has
2119 + been compared in great detail with the various common water models,
2120 + and TIP5P was found to be in better agreement than other rigid,
2121 + non-polarizable models.\cite{Sorenson00} This excellent agreement with
2122 + experiment was maintained when Rick developed TIP5P-E.\cite{Rick04} To
2123 + check whether the choice of using the Ewald summation or the {\sc sf}
2124 + technique alters the liquid structure, the $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$s at 298K
2125 + and 1atm were determined for the systems compared in the previous
2126 + section.
2127 +
2128 + \begin{figure}
2129 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/tip5peGofR.pdf}
2130 + \caption{The $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$s calculated for TIP5P-E at 298K and
2131 + 1atm while using the Ewald summation (Ref. \cite{Rick04}) and the {\sc
2132 + sf} technique with varying parameters. Even with the reduced densities
2133 + using the {\sc sf} technique, the $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$s are essentially
2134 + identical.}
2135 + \label{fig:t5peGofRs}
2136 + \end{figure}
2137 +
2138 + The $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$s calculated for TIP5P-E while using the {\sc
2139 + sf} technique with a various parameters are overlaid on the
2140 + $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ while using the Ewald summation. The differences in
2141 + density do not appear to have any effect on the liquid structure as
2142 + the $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$s are indistinquishable. These results indicate
2143 + that the $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ is insensitive to the choice of
2144 + electrostatic correction.
2145 +
2146 + \subsection{Thermodynamic Properties}
2147 +
2148 + \subsection{Dynamic Properties}
2149 +
2150 + \section{Conclusions}\label{sec:PairwiseConclusions}
2151 +
2152   The above investigation of pairwise electrostatic summation techniques
2153   shows that there are viable and computationally efficient alternatives
2154   to the Ewald summation.  These methods are derived from the damped and
# Line 2013 | Line 2201 | expect.
2201   required to obtain the level of accuracy most researchers have come to
2202   expect.
2203  
2016 \section{An Application: TIP5P-E Water}
2204  
2205  
2206 +
2207   \chapter{\label{chap:water}SIMPLE MODELS FOR WATER}
2208  
2209   \chapter{\label{chap:ice}PHASE BEHAVIOR OF WATER IN COMPUTER SIMULATIONS}

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines