ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/fennellDissertation/dissertation.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/fennellDissertation/dissertation.tex (file contents):
Revision 2918 by chrisfen, Mon Jul 3 13:55:25 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2973 by chrisfen, Fri Aug 18 15:49:29 2006 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[12pt]{ndthesis}
1 > \documentclass[11pt]{ndthesis}
2  
3   % some packages for things like equations and graphics
4 + \usepackage[tbtags]{amsmath}
5   \usepackage{amsmath,bm}
6   \usepackage{amssymb}
7   \usepackage{mathrsfs}
8   \usepackage{tabularx}
9   \usepackage{graphicx}
10   \usepackage{booktabs}
11 + \usepackage{cite}
12 + \usepackage{enumitem}
13  
14   \begin{document}
15  
# Line 40 | Line 43 | STUDY OF WATER}    
43  
44   \chapter{\label{chap:intro}INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND}
45  
46 < \chapter{\label{chap:electrostatics}ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTION CORRECTION
44 < TECHNIQUES}
45 <
46 < In molecular simulations, proper accumulation of the electrostatic
47 < interactions is essential and is one of the most
48 < computationally-demanding tasks.  The common molecular mechanics force
49 < fields represent atomic sites with full or partial charges protected
50 < by Lennard-Jones (short range) interactions.  This means that nearly
51 < every pair interaction involves a calculation of charge-charge forces.
52 < Coupled with relatively long-ranged $r^{-1}$ decay, the monopole
53 < interactions quickly become the most expensive part of molecular
54 < simulations.  Historically, the electrostatic pair interaction would
55 < not have decayed appreciably within the typical box lengths that could
56 < be feasibly simulated.  In the larger systems that are more typical of
57 < modern simulations, large cutoffs should be used to incorporate
58 < electrostatics correctly.
59 <
60 < There have been many efforts to address the proper and practical
61 < handling of electrostatic interactions, and these have resulted in a
62 < variety of techniques.\cite{Roux99,Sagui99,Tobias01} These are
63 < typically classified as implicit methods (i.e., continuum dielectrics,
64 < static dipolar fields),\cite{Born20,Grossfield00} explicit methods
65 < (i.e., Ewald summations, interaction shifting or
66 < truncation),\cite{Ewald21,Steinbach94} or a mixture of the two (i.e.,
67 < reaction field type methods, fast multipole
68 < methods).\cite{Onsager36,Rokhlin85} The explicit or mixed methods are
69 < often preferred because they physically incorporate solvent molecules
70 < in the system of interest, but these methods are sometimes difficult
71 < to utilize because of their high computational cost.\cite{Roux99} In
72 < addition to the computational cost, there have been some questions
73 < regarding possible artifacts caused by the inherent periodicity of the
74 < explicit Ewald summation.\cite{Tobias01}
75 <
76 < In this chapter, we focus on a new set of pairwise methods devised by
77 < Wolf {\it et al.},\cite{Wolf99} which we further extend.  These
78 < methods along with a few other mixed methods (i.e. reaction field) are
79 < compared with the smooth particle mesh Ewald
80 < sum,\cite{Onsager36,Essmann99} which is our reference method for
81 < handling long-range electrostatic interactions. The new methods for
82 < handling electrostatics have the potential to scale linearly with
83 < increasing system size since they involve only a simple modification
84 < to the direct pairwise sum.  They also lack the added periodicity of
85 < the Ewald sum, so they can be used for systems which are non-periodic
86 < or which have one- or two-dimensional periodicity.  Below, these
87 < methods are evaluated using a variety of model systems to
88 < establish their usability in molecular simulations.
89 <
90 < \section{The Ewald Sum}
91 <
92 < The complete accumulation of the electrostatic interactions in a system with
93 < periodic boundary conditions (PBC) requires the consideration of the
94 < effect of all charges within a (cubic) simulation box as well as those
95 < in the periodic replicas,
96 < \begin{equation}
97 < V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2} {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime
98 < \left[ \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \phi
99 < \left( \mathbf{r}_{ij} + L\mathbf{n},\bm{\Omega}_i,\bm{\Omega}_j\right)
100 < \right],
101 < \label{eq:PBCSum}
102 < \end{equation}
103 < where the sum over $\mathbf{n}$ is a sum over all periodic box
104 < replicas with integer coordinates $\mathbf{n} = (l,m,n)$, and the
105 < prime indicates $i = j$ are neglected for $\mathbf{n} =
106 < 0$.\cite{deLeeuw80} Within the sum, $N$ is the number of electrostatic
107 < particles, $\mathbf{r}_{ij}$ is $\mathbf{r}_j - \mathbf{r}_i$, $L$ is
108 < the cell length, $\bm{\Omega}_{i,j}$ are the Euler angles for $i$ and
109 < $j$, and $\phi$ is the solution to Poisson's equation
110 < ($\phi(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) = q_i q_j |\mathbf{r}_{ij}|^{-1}$ for
111 < charge-charge interactions). In the case of monopole electrostatics,
112 < eq. (\ref{eq:PBCSum}) is conditionally convergent and is divergent for
113 < non-neutral systems.
114 <
115 < The electrostatic summation problem was originally studied by Ewald
116 < for the case of an infinite crystal.\cite{Ewald21}. The approach he
117 < took was to convert this conditionally convergent sum into two
118 < absolutely convergent summations: a short-ranged real-space summation
119 < and a long-ranged reciprocal-space summation,
120 < \begin{equation}
121 < \begin{split}
122 < V_\textrm{elec} = \frac{1}{2}&
123 < \sum_{i=1}^N\sum_{j=1}^N \Biggr[ q_i q_j\Biggr( {\sum_{\mathbf{n}}}^\prime
124 < \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left( \alpha|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|\right)}
125 < {|\mathbf{r}_{ij}+\mathbf{n}|} \\
126 < &+ \frac{1}{\pi L^3}\sum_{\mathbf{k}\ne 0}\frac{4\pi^2}{|\mathbf{k}|^2}
127 < \exp{\left(-\frac{\pi^2|\mathbf{k}|^2}{\alpha^2}\right)
128 < \cos\left(\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}_{ij}\right)}\Biggr)\Biggr] \\
129 < &- \frac{\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\sum_{i=1}^N q_i^2
130 < + \frac{2\pi}{(2\epsilon_\textrm{S}+1)L^3}
131 < \left|\sum_{i=1}^N q_i\mathbf{r}_i\right|^2,
132 < \end{split}
133 < \label{eq:EwaldSum}
134 < \end{equation}
135 < where $\alpha$ is the damping or convergence parameter with units of
136 < \AA$^{-1}$, $\mathbf{k}$ are the reciprocal vectors and are equal to
137 < $2\pi\mathbf{n}/L^2$, and $\epsilon_\textrm{S}$ is the dielectric
138 < constant of the surrounding medium. The final two terms of
139 < eq. (\ref{eq:EwaldSum}) are a particle-self term and a dipolar term
140 < for interacting with a surrounding dielectric.\cite{Allen87} This
141 < dipolar term was neglected in early applications in molecular
142 < simulations,\cite{Brush66,Woodcock71} until it was introduced by de
143 < Leeuw {\it et al.} to address situations where the unit cell has a
144 < dipole moment which is magnified through replication of the periodic
145 < images.\cite{deLeeuw80,Smith81} If this term is taken to be zero, the
146 < system is said to be using conducting (or ``tin-foil'') boundary
147 < conditions, $\epsilon_{\rm S} = \infty$. Figure
148 < \ref{fig:ewaldTime} shows how the Ewald sum has been applied over
149 < time.  Initially, due to the small system sizes that could be
150 < simulated feasibly, the entire simulation box was replicated to
151 < convergence.  In more modern simulations, the systems have grown large
152 < enough that a real-space cutoff could potentially give convergent
153 < behavior.  Indeed, it has been observed that with the choice of a
154 < small $\alpha$, the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald sum can be
155 < rapidly convergent and small relative to the real-space
156 < portion.\cite{Karasawa89,Kolafa92}
157 <
158 < \begin{figure}
159 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/ewaldProgression.pdf}
160 < \caption{The change in the need for the Ewald sum with
161 < increasing computational power.  A:~Initially, only small systems
162 < could be studied, and the Ewald sum replicated the simulation box to
163 < convergence.  B:~Now, radial cutoff methods should be able to reach
164 < convergence for the larger systems of charges that are common today.}
165 < \label{fig:ewaldTime}
166 < \end{figure}
167 <
168 < The original Ewald summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ algorithm.  The
169 < convergence parameter $(\alpha)$ plays an important role in balancing
170 < the computational cost between the direct and reciprocal-space
171 < portions of the summation.  The choice of this value allows one to
172 < select whether the real-space or reciprocal space portion of the
173 < summation is an $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ calculation (with the other being
174 < $\mathscr{O}(N)$).\cite{Sagui99} With the appropriate choice of
175 < $\alpha$ and thoughtful algorithm development, this cost can be
176 < reduced to $\mathscr{O}(N^{3/2})$.\cite{Perram88} The typical route
177 < taken to reduce the cost of the Ewald summation even further is to set
178 < $\alpha$ such that the real-space interactions decay rapidly, allowing
179 < for a short spherical cutoff. Then the reciprocal space summation is
180 < optimized.  These optimizations usually involve utilization of the
181 < fast Fourier transform (FFT),\cite{Hockney81} leading to the
182 < particle-particle particle-mesh (P3M) and particle mesh Ewald (PME)
183 < methods.\cite{Shimada93,Luty94,Luty95,Darden93,Essmann95} In these
184 < methods, the cost of the reciprocal-space portion of the Ewald
185 < summation is reduced from $\mathscr{O}(N^2)$ down to $\mathscr{O}(N
186 < \log N)$.
187 <
188 < These developments and optimizations have made the use of the Ewald
189 < summation routine in simulations with periodic boundary
190 < conditions. However, in certain systems, such as vapor-liquid
191 < interfaces and membranes, the intrinsic three-dimensional periodicity
192 < can prove problematic.  The Ewald sum has been reformulated to handle
193 < 2-D systems,\cite{Parry75,Parry76,Heyes77,deLeeuw79,Rhee89} but these
194 < methods are computationally expensive.\cite{Spohr97,Yeh99} More
195 < recently, there have been several successful efforts toward reducing
196 < the computational cost of 2-D lattice
197 < summations,\cite{Yeh99,Kawata01,Arnold02,deJoannis02,Brodka04}
198 < bringing them more in line with the cost of the full 3-D summation.
199 <
200 < Several studies have recognized that the inherent periodicity in the
201 < Ewald sum can also have an effect on three-dimensional
202 < systems.\cite{Roberts94,Roberts95,Luty96,Hunenberger99a,Hunenberger99b,Weber00}
203 < Solvated proteins are essentially kept at high concentration due to
204 < the periodicity of the electrostatic summation method.  In these
205 < systems, the more compact folded states of a protein can be
206 < artificially stabilized by the periodic replicas introduced by the
207 < Ewald summation.\cite{Weber00} Thus, care must be taken when
208 < considering the use of the Ewald summation where the assumed
209 < periodicity would introduce spurious effects in the system dynamics.
210 <
211 <
212 < \section{The Wolf and Zahn Methods}
213 <
214 < In a recent paper by Wolf \textit{et al.}, a procedure was outlined
215 < for the accurate accumulation of electrostatic interactions in an
216 < efficient pairwise fashion.  This procedure lacks the inherent
217 < periodicity of the Ewald summation.\cite{Wolf99} Wolf \textit{et al.}
218 < observed that the electrostatic interaction is effectively
219 < short-ranged in condensed phase systems and that neutralization of the
220 < charge contained within the cutoff radius is crucial for potential
221 < stability. They devised a pairwise summation method that ensures
222 < charge neutrality and gives results similar to those obtained with the
223 < Ewald summation.  The resulting shifted Coulomb potential includes
224 < image-charges subtracted out through placement on the cutoff sphere
225 < and a distance-dependent damping function (identical to that seen in
226 < the real-space portion of the Ewald sum) to aid convergence
227 < \begin{equation}
228 < V_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij})= \frac{q_i q_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}
229 < - \lim_{r_{ij}\rightarrow R_\textrm{c}}
230 < \left\{\frac{q_iq_j \textrm{erfc}(\alpha r_{ij})}{r_{ij}}\right\}.
231 < \label{eq:WolfPot}
232 < \end{equation}
233 < Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) is essentially the common form of a shifted
234 < potential.  However, neutralizing the charge contained within each
235 < cutoff sphere requires the placement of a self-image charge on the
236 < surface of the cutoff sphere.  This additional self-term in the total
237 < potential enabled Wolf {\it et al.}  to obtain excellent estimates of
238 < Madelung energies for many crystals.
239 <
240 < In order to use their charge-neutralized potential in molecular
241 < dynamics simulations, Wolf \textit{et al.} suggested taking the
242 < derivative of this potential prior to evaluation of the limit.  This
243 < procedure gives an expression for the forces,
244 < \begin{equation}
245 < \begin{split}
246 < F_{\textrm{Wolf}}(r_{ij}) = q_i q_j \Biggr\{&
247 < \Biggr[\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r^2_{ij}}
248 < + \frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r_{ij}^2\right)}}{r_{ij}}
249 < \Biggr]\\
250 < &-\Biggr[
251 < \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}{R_{\textrm{c}}^2}
252 < + \frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}
253 < \frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}
254 < \Biggr]\Biggr\},
255 < \end{split}
256 < \label{eq:WolfForces}
257 < \end{equation}
258 < that incorporates both image charges and damping of the electrostatic
259 < interaction.
260 <
261 < More recently, Zahn \textit{et al.} investigated these potential and
262 < force expressions for use in simulations involving water.\cite{Zahn02}
263 < In their work, they pointed out that the forces and derivative of
264 < the potential are not commensurate.  Attempts to use both
265 < eqs. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) and (\ref{eq:WolfForces}) together will lead
266 < to poor energy conservation.  They correctly observed that taking the
267 < limit shown in equation (\ref{eq:WolfPot}) {\it after} calculating the
268 < derivatives gives forces for a different potential energy function
269 < than the one shown in eq. (\ref{eq:WolfPot}).
270 <
271 < Zahn \textit{et al.} introduced a modified form of this summation
272 < method as a way to use the technique in Molecular Dynamics
273 < simulations.  They proposed a new damped Coulomb potential,
274 < \begin{equation}
275 < \begin{split}
276 < V_{\textrm{Zahn}}(r_{ij}) = q_iq_j\Biggr\{&
277 < \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r_{ij}\right)}{r_{ij}} \\
278 < &- \left[\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}
279 < + \frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}
280 < \frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}
281 < \right]\left(r_{ij}-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\Biggr\},
282 < \end{split}
283 < \label{eq:ZahnPot}
284 < \end{equation}
285 < and showed that this potential does fairly well at capturing the
286 < structural and dynamic properties of water compared the same
287 < properties obtained using the Ewald sum.
288 <
289 < \section{Simple Forms for Pairwise Electrostatics}
290 <
291 < The potentials proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.} and Zahn \textit{et
292 < al.} are constructed using two different (and separable) computational
293 < tricks:
294 <
295 < \begin{enumerate}
296 < \item shifting through the use of image charges, and
297 < \item damping the electrostatic interaction.
298 < \end{enumerate}  
299 < Wolf \textit{et al.} treated the
300 < development of their summation method as a progressive application of
301 < these techniques,\cite{Wolf99} while Zahn \textit{et al.} founded
302 < their damped Coulomb modification (Eq. (\ref{eq:ZahnPot})) on the
303 < post-limit forces (Eq. (\ref{eq:WolfForces})) which were derived using
304 < both techniques.  It is possible, however, to separate these
305 < tricks and study their effects independently.
306 <
307 < Starting with the original observation that the effective range of the
308 < electrostatic interaction in condensed phases is considerably less
309 < than $r^{-1}$, either the cutoff sphere neutralization or the
310 < distance-dependent damping technique could be used as a foundation for
311 < a new pairwise summation method.  Wolf \textit{et al.} made the
312 < observation that charge neutralization within the cutoff sphere plays
313 < a significant role in energy convergence; therefore we will begin our
314 < analysis with the various shifted forms that maintain this charge
315 < neutralization.  We can evaluate the methods of Wolf
316 < \textit{et al.}  and Zahn \textit{et al.} by considering the standard
317 < shifted potential,
318 < \begin{equation}
319 < V_\textrm{SP}(r) =      \begin{cases}
320 < v(r)-v_\textrm{c} &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r >
321 < R_\textrm{c}  
322 < \end{cases},
323 < \label{eq:shiftingPotForm}
324 < \end{equation}
325 < and shifted force,
326 < \begin{equation}
327 < V_\textrm{SF}(r) = \begin{cases}
328 < v(r) - v_\textrm{c}
329 < - \left(\frac{d v(r)}{d r}\right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}(r-R_\textrm{c})
330 < &\quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c} \\ 0 &\quad r > R_\textrm{c}
331 < \end{cases},
332 < \label{eq:shiftingForm}
333 < \end{equation}
334 < functions where $v(r)$ is the unshifted form of the potential, and
335 < $v_c$ is $v(R_\textrm{c})$.  The Shifted Force ({\sc sf}) form ensures
336 < that both the potential and the forces goes to zero at the cutoff
337 < radius, while the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) form only ensures the
338 < potential is smooth at the cutoff radius
339 < ($R_\textrm{c}$).\cite{Allen87}
340 <
341 < The forces associated with the shifted potential are simply the forces
342 < of the unshifted potential itself (when inside the cutoff sphere),
343 < \begin{equation}
344 < F_{\textrm{SP}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right),
345 < \end{equation}
346 < and are zero outside.  Inside the cutoff sphere, the forces associated
347 < with the shifted force form can be written,
348 < \begin{equation}
349 < F_{\textrm{SF}} = -\left( \frac{d v(r)}{dr} \right) + \left(\frac{d
350 < v(r)}{dr} \right)_{r=R_\textrm{c}}.
351 < \end{equation}
352 <
353 < If the potential, $v(r)$, is taken to be the normal Coulomb potential,
354 < \begin{equation}
355 < v(r) = \frac{q_i q_j}{r},
356 < \label{eq:Coulomb}
357 < \end{equation}
358 < then the Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) forms will give Wolf {\it et
359 < al.}'s undamped prescription:
360 < \begin{equation}
361 < V_\textrm{SP}(r) =
362 < q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}\right) \quad
363 < r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
364 < \label{eq:SPPot}
365 < \end{equation}
366 < with associated forces,
367 < \begin{equation}
368 < F_\textrm{SP}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}\right)
369 < \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
370 < \label{eq:SPForces}
371 < \end{equation}
372 < These forces are identical to the forces of the standard Coulomb
373 < interaction, and cutting these off at $R_c$ was addressed by Wolf
374 < \textit{et al.} as undesirable.  They pointed out that the effect of
375 < the image charges is neglected in the forces when this form is
376 < used,\cite{Wolf99} thereby eliminating any benefit from the method in
377 < molecular dynamics.  Additionally, there is a discontinuity in the
378 < forces at the cutoff radius which results in energy drift during MD
379 < simulations.
380 <
381 < The shifted force ({\sc sf}) form using the normal Coulomb potential
382 < will give,
383 < \begin{equation}
384 < V_\textrm{SF}(r) = q_iq_j\left[\frac{1}{r}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}}
385 < + \left(\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)(r-R_\textrm{c})\right]
386 < \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
387 < \label{eq:SFPot}
388 < \end{equation}
389 < with associated forces,
390 < \begin{equation}
391 < F_\textrm{SF}(r) =  q_iq_j\left(\frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{R_\textrm{c}^2}\right)
392 < \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
393 < \label{eq:SFForces}
394 < \end{equation}
395 < This formulation has the benefits that there are no discontinuities at
396 < the cutoff radius, while the neutralizing image charges are present in
397 < both the energy and force expressions.  It would be simple to add the
398 < self-neutralizing term back when computing the total energy of the
399 < system, thereby maintaining the agreement with the Madelung energies.
400 < A side effect of this treatment is the alteration in the shape of the
401 < potential that comes from the derivative term.  Thus, a degree of
402 < clarity about agreement with the empirical potential is lost in order
403 < to gain functionality in dynamics simulations.
404 <
405 < Wolf \textit{et al.} originally discussed the energetics of the
406 < shifted Coulomb potential (Eq. \ref{eq:SPPot}) and found that it was
407 < insufficient for accurate determination of the energy with reasonable
408 < cutoff distances.  The calculated Madelung energies fluctuated around
409 < the expected value as the cutoff radius was increased, but the
410 < oscillations converged toward the correct value.\cite{Wolf99} A
411 < damping function was incorporated to accelerate the convergence; and
412 < though alternative forms for the damping function could be
413 < used,\cite{Jones56,Heyes81} the complimentary error function was
414 < chosen to mirror the effective screening used in the Ewald summation.
415 < Incorporating this error function damping into the simple Coulomb
416 < potential,
417 < \begin{equation}
418 < v(r) = \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r},
419 < \label{eq:dampCoulomb}
420 < \end{equation}
421 < the shifted potential (eq. (\ref{eq:SPPot})) becomes
422 < \begin{equation}
423 < V_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j\left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}
424 < - \frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\textrm{c}\right)}{R_\textrm{c}}\right)
425 < \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c},
426 < \label{eq:DSPPot}
427 < \end{equation}
428 < with associated forces,
429 < \begin{equation}
430 < F_{\textrm{DSP}}(r) = q_iq_j
431 < \left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}
432 < + \frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right)
433 < \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
434 < \label{eq:DSPForces}
435 < \end{equation}
436 < Again, this damped shifted potential suffers from a
437 < force-discontinuity at the cutoff radius, and the image charges play
438 < no role in the forces.  To remedy these concerns, one may derive a
439 < {\sc sf} variant by including the derivative term in
440 < eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}),
441 < \begin{equation}
442 < \begin{split}
443 < V_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&
444 < \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r}
445 < - \frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}} \\
446 < &+ \left(\frac{\mathrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_\mathrm{c}\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}^2}
447 < + \frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}
448 < \frac{\exp\left(-\alpha^2R_\mathrm{c}^2\right)}{R_\mathrm{c}}
449 < \right)\left(r-R_\mathrm{c}\right)\ \Biggr{]}
450 < \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
451 < \label{eq:DSFPot}
452 < \end{split}
453 < \end{equation}
454 < The derivative of the above potential will lead to the following forces,
455 < \begin{equation}
456 < \begin{split}
457 < F_\mathrm{DSF}(r) = q_iq_j\Biggr{[}&
458 < \left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha r\right)}{r^2}
459 < + \frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}\frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2r^2\right)}}{r}\right) \\
460 < &- \left(\frac{\textrm{erfc}\left(\alpha R_{\textrm{c}}\right)}
461 < {R_{\textrm{c}}^2}
462 < + \frac{2\alpha}{\pi^{1/2}}
463 < \frac{\exp{\left(-\alpha^2R_{\textrm{c}}^2\right)}}{R_{\textrm{c}}}
464 < \right)\Biggr{]}
465 < \quad r\leqslant R_\textrm{c}.
466 < \label{eq:DSFForces}
467 < \end{split}
468 < \end{equation}
469 < If the damping parameter $(\alpha)$ is set to zero, the undamped case,
470 < eqs. (\ref{eq:SPPot} through \ref{eq:SFForces}) are correctly
471 < recovered from eqs. (\ref{eq:DSPPot} through \ref{eq:DSFForces}).
472 <
473 < This new {\sc sf} potential is similar to equation \ref{eq:ZahnPot}
474 < derived by Zahn \textit{et al.}; however, there are two important
475 < differences.\cite{Zahn02} First, the $v_\textrm{c}$ term from
476 < eq. (\ref{eq:shiftingForm}) is equal to eq. (\ref{eq:dampCoulomb})
477 < with $r$ replaced by $R_\textrm{c}$.  This term is {\it not} present
478 < in the Zahn potential, resulting in a potential discontinuity as
479 < particles cross $R_\textrm{c}$.  Second, the sign of the derivative
480 < portion is different.  The missing $v_\textrm{c}$ term would not
481 < affect molecular dynamics simulations (although the computed energy
482 < would be expected to have sudden jumps as particle distances crossed
483 < $R_c$).  The sign problem is a potential source of errors, however.
484 < In fact, it introduces a discontinuity in the forces at the cutoff,
485 < because the force function is shifted in the wrong direction and
486 < doesn't cross zero at $R_\textrm{c}$.
487 <
488 < Eqs. (\ref{eq:DSFPot}) and (\ref{eq:DSFForces}) result in an
489 < electrostatic summation method in which the potential and forces are
490 < continuous at the cutoff radius and which incorporates the damping
491 < function proposed by Wolf \textit{et al.}\cite{Wolf99} In the rest of
492 < this paper, we will evaluate exactly how good these methods ({\sc sp},
493 < {\sc sf}, damping) are at reproducing the correct electrostatic
494 < summation performed by the Ewald sum.
495 <
496 <
497 < \section{Evaluating Pairwise Summation Techniques}
498 <
499 < In classical molecular mechanics simulations, there are two primary
500 < techniques utilized to obtain information about the system of
501 < interest: Monte Carlo (MC) and Molecular Dynamics (MD).  Both of these
502 < techniques utilize pairwise summations of interactions between
503 < particle sites, but they use these summations in different ways.
504 <
505 < In MC, the potential energy difference between configurations dictates
506 < the progression of MC sampling.  Going back to the origins of this
507 < method, the acceptance criterion for the canonical ensemble laid out
508 < by Metropolis \textit{et al.} states that a subsequent configuration
509 < is accepted if $\Delta E < 0$ or if $\xi < \exp(-\Delta E/kT)$, where
510 < $\xi$ is a random number between 0 and 1.\cite{Metropolis53}
511 < Maintaining the correct $\Delta E$ when using an alternate method for
512 < handling the long-range electrostatics will ensure proper sampling
513 < from the ensemble.
514 <
515 < In MD, the derivative of the potential governs how the system will
516 < progress in time.  Consequently, the force and torque vectors on each
517 < body in the system dictate how the system evolves.  If the magnitude
518 < and direction of these vectors are similar when using alternate
519 < electrostatic summation techniques, the dynamics in the short term
520 < will be indistinguishable.  Because error in MD calculations is
521 < cumulative, one should expect greater deviation at longer times,
522 < although methods which have large differences in the force and torque
523 < vectors will diverge from each other more rapidly.
524 <
525 < \subsection{Monte Carlo and the Energy Gap}\label{sec:MCMethods}
526 <
527 < The pairwise summation techniques (outlined in section
528 < \ref{sec:ESMethods}) were evaluated for use in MC simulations by
529 < studying the energy differences between conformations.  We took the
530 < {\sc spme}-computed energy difference between two conformations to be the
531 < correct behavior. An ideal performance by an alternative method would
532 < reproduce these energy differences exactly (even if the absolute
533 < energies calculated by the methods are different).  Since none of the
534 < methods provide exact energy differences, we used linear least squares
535 < regressions of energy gap data to evaluate how closely the methods
536 < mimicked the Ewald energy gaps.  Unitary results for both the
537 < correlation (slope) and correlation coefficient for these regressions
538 < indicate perfect agreement between the alternative method and {\sc spme}.
539 < Sample correlation plots for two alternate methods are shown in
540 < Fig. \ref{fig:linearFit}.
541 <
542 < \begin{figure}
543 < \centering
544 < \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./figures/dualLinear.pdf}
545 < \caption{Example least squares regressions of the configuration energy
546 < differences for SPC/E water systems. The upper plot shows a data set
547 < with a poor correlation coefficient ($R^2$), while the lower plot
548 < shows a data set with a good correlation coefficient.}
549 < \label{fig:linearFit}
550 < \end{figure}
551 <
552 < Each of the seven system types (detailed in section \ref{sec:RepSims})
553 < were represented using 500 independent configurations.  Thus, each of
554 < the alternative (non-Ewald) electrostatic summation methods was
555 < evaluated using an accumulated 873,250 configurational energy
556 < differences.
557 <
558 < Results and discussion for the individual analysis of each of the
559 < system types appear in sections \ref{sec:SystemResults}, while the
560 < cumulative results over all the investigated systems appear below in
561 < sections \ref{sec:EnergyResults}.
562 <
563 < \subsection{Molecular Dynamics and the Force and Torque
564 < Vectors}\label{sec:MDMethods} We evaluated the pairwise methods
565 < (outlined in section \ref{sec:ESMethods}) for use in MD simulations by
566 < comparing the force and torque vectors with those obtained using the
567 < reference Ewald summation ({\sc spme}).  Both the magnitude and the
568 < direction of these vectors on each of the bodies in the system were
569 < analyzed.  For the magnitude of these vectors, linear least squares
570 < regression analyses were performed as described previously for
571 < comparing $\Delta E$ values.  Instead of a single energy difference
572 < between two system configurations, we compared the magnitudes of the
573 < forces (and torques) on each molecule in each configuration.  For a
574 < system of 1000 water molecules and 40 ions, there are 1040 force
575 < vectors and 1000 torque vectors.  With 500 configurations, this
576 < results in 520,000 force and 500,000 torque vector comparisons.
577 < Additionally, data from seven different system types was aggregated
578 < before the comparison was made.
579 <
580 < The {\it directionality} of the force and torque vectors was
581 < investigated through measurement of the angle ($\theta$) formed
582 < between those computed from the particular method and those from {\sc spme},
583 < \begin{equation}
584 < \theta_f = \cos^{-1} \left(\hat{F}_\textrm{SPME}
585 < \cdot \hat{F}_\textrm{M}\right),
586 < \end{equation}
587 < where $\hat{F}_\textrm{M}$ is the unit vector pointing along the force
588 < vector computed using method M.  Each of these $\theta$ values was
589 < accumulated in a distribution function and weighted by the area on the
590 < unit sphere.  Since this distribution is a measure of angular error
591 < between two different electrostatic summation methods, there is no
592 < {\it a priori} reason for the profile to adhere to any specific
593 < shape. Thus, gaussian fits were used to measure the width of the
594 < resulting distributions. The variance ($\sigma^2$) was extracted from
595 < each of these fits and was used to compare distribution widths.
596 < Values of $\sigma^2$ near zero indicate vector directions
597 < indistinguishable from those calculated when using the reference
598 < method ({\sc spme}).
599 <
600 < \subsection{Short-time Dynamics}
601 <
602 < The effects of the alternative electrostatic summation methods on the
603 < short-time dynamics of charged systems were evaluated by considering a
604 < NaCl crystal at a temperature of 1000 K.  A subset of the best
605 < performing pairwise methods was used in this comparison.  The NaCl
606 < crystal was chosen to avoid possible complications from the treatment
607 < of orientational motion in molecular systems.  All systems were
608 < started with the same initial positions and velocities.  Simulations
609 < were performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
610 < autocorrelation functions (Eq. \ref{eq:vCorr}) were computed for each
611 < of the trajectories,
612 < \begin{equation}
613 < C_v(t) = \frac{\langle v(0)\cdot v(t)\rangle}{\langle v^2\rangle}.
614 < \label{eq:vCorr}
615 < \end{equation}
616 < Velocity autocorrelation functions require detailed short time data,
617 < thus velocity information was saved every 2 fs over 10 ps
618 < trajectories. Because the NaCl crystal is composed of two different
619 < atom types, the average of the two resulting velocity autocorrelation
620 < functions was used for comparisons.
621 <
622 < \subsection{Long-Time and Collective Motion}\label{sec:LongTimeMethods}
623 <
624 < The effects of the same subset of alternative electrostatic methods on
625 < the {\it long-time} dynamics of charged systems were evaluated using
626 < the same model system (NaCl crystals at 1000K).  The power spectrum
627 < ($I(\omega)$) was obtained via Fourier transform of the velocity
628 < autocorrelation function, \begin{equation} I(\omega) =
629 < \frac{1}{2\pi}\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}C_v(t)e^{-i\omega t}dt,
630 < \label{eq:powerSpec}
631 < \end{equation}
632 < where the frequency, $\omega=0,\ 1,\ ...,\ N-1$. Again, because the
633 < NaCl crystal is composed of two different atom types, the average of
634 < the two resulting power spectra was used for comparisons. Simulations
635 < were performed under the microcanonical ensemble, and velocity
636 < information was saved every 5~fs over 100~ps trajectories.
637 <
638 < \subsection{Representative Simulations}\label{sec:RepSims}
639 < A variety of representative molecular simulations were analyzed to
640 < determine the relative effectiveness of the pairwise summation
641 < techniques in reproducing the energetics and dynamics exhibited by
642 < {\sc spme}.  We wanted to span the space of typical molecular
643 < simulations (i.e. from liquids of neutral molecules to ionic
644 < crystals), so the systems studied were:
645 <
646 < \begin{enumerate}
647 < \item liquid water (SPC/E),\cite{Berendsen87}
648 < \item crystalline water (Ice I$_\textrm{c}$ crystals of SPC/E),
649 < \item NaCl crystals,
650 < \item NaCl melts,
651 < \item a low ionic strength solution of NaCl in water (0.11 M),
652 < \item a high ionic strength solution of NaCl in water (1.1 M), and
653 < \item a 6\AA\  radius sphere of Argon in water.
654 < \end{enumerate}
655 <
656 < By utilizing the pairwise techniques (outlined in section
657 < \ref{sec:ESMethods}) in systems composed entirely of neutral groups,
658 < charged particles, and mixtures of the two, we hope to discern under
659 < which conditions it will be possible to use one of the alternative
660 < summation methodologies instead of the Ewald sum.
661 <
662 < For the solid and liquid water configurations, configurations were
663 < taken at regular intervals from high temperature trajectories of 1000
664 < SPC/E water molecules.  Each configuration was equilibrated
665 < independently at a lower temperature (300K for the liquid, 200K for
666 < the crystal).  The solid and liquid NaCl systems consisted of 500
667 < $\textrm{Na}^{+}$ and 500 $\textrm{Cl}^{-}$ ions.  Configurations for
668 < these systems were selected and equilibrated in the same manner as the
669 < water systems. In order to introduce measurable fluctuations in the
670 < configuration energy differences, the crystalline simulations were
671 < equilibrated at 1000K, near the $T_\textrm{m}$ for NaCl. The liquid
672 < NaCl configurations needed to represent a fully disordered array of
673 < point charges, so the high temperature of 7000K was selected for
674 < equilibration. The ionic solutions were made by solvating 4 (or 40)
675 < ions in a periodic box containing 1000 SPC/E water molecules.  Ion and
676 < water positions were then randomly swapped, and the resulting
677 < configurations were again equilibrated individually.  Finally, for the
678 < Argon / Water ``charge void'' systems, the identities of all the SPC/E
679 < waters within 6\AA\ of the center of the equilibrated water
680 < configurations were converted to argon.
681 <
682 < These procedures guaranteed us a set of representative configurations
683 < from chemically-relevant systems sampled from appropriate
684 < ensembles. Force field parameters for the ions and Argon were taken
685 < from the force field utilized by {\sc oopse}.\cite{Meineke05}
686 <
687 < \subsection{Comparison of Summation Methods}\label{sec:ESMethods}
688 < We compared the following alternative summation methods with results
689 < from the reference method ({\sc spme}):
690 <
691 < \begin{enumerate}
692 < \item {\sc sp} with damping parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2,
693 < and 0.3\AA$^{-1}$,
694 < \item {\sc sf} with damping parameters ($\alpha$) of 0.0, 0.1, 0.2,
695 < and 0.3\AA$^{-1}$,
696 < \item reaction field with an infinite dielectric constant, and
697 < \item an unmodified cutoff.
698 < \end{enumerate}
699 <
700 < Group-based cutoffs with a fifth-order polynomial switching function
701 < were utilized for the reaction field simulations.  Additionally, we
702 < investigated the use of these cutoffs with the {\sc sp}, {\sc sf}, and pure
703 < cutoff.  The {\sc spme} electrostatics were performed using the {\sc tinker}
704 < implementation of {\sc spme},\cite{Ponder87} while all other calculations
705 < were performed using the {\sc oopse} molecular mechanics
706 < package.\cite{Meineke05} All other portions of the energy calculation
707 < (i.e. Lennard-Jones interactions) were handled in exactly the same
708 < manner across all systems and configurations.
709 <
710 < The alternative methods were also evaluated with three different
711 < cutoff radii (9, 12, and 15\AA).  As noted previously, the
712 < convergence parameter ($\alpha$) plays a role in the balance of the
713 < real-space and reciprocal-space portions of the Ewald calculation.
714 < Typical molecular mechanics packages set this to a value dependent on
715 < the cutoff radius and a tolerance (typically less than $1 \times
716 < 10^{-4}$ kcal/mol).  Smaller tolerances are typically associated with
717 < increasing accuracy at the expense of computational time spent on the
718 < reciprocal-space portion of the summation.\cite{Perram88,Essmann95}
719 < The default {\sc tinker} tolerance of $1 \times 10^{-8}$ kcal/mol was used
720 < in all {\sc spme} calculations, resulting in Ewald coefficients of 0.4200,
721 < 0.3119, and 0.2476\AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff radii of 9, 12, and 15\AA\
722 < respectively.
723 <
724 <
725 < \section{Discussion on the Pairwise Technique Evaluation}
726 <
727 < \subsection{Configuration Energy Differences}\label{sec:EnergyResults}
728 < In order to evaluate the performance of the pairwise electrostatic
729 < summation methods for Monte Carlo simulations, the energy differences
730 < between configurations were compared to the values obtained when using
731 < {\sc spme}.  The results for the combined regression analysis of all
732 < of the systems are shown in figure \ref{fig:delE}.
733 <
734 < \begin{figure}
735 < \centering
736 < \includegraphics[width=4.75in]{./figures/delEplot.pdf}
737 < \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of configurational energy
738 < differences for a given electrostatic method compared with the
739 < reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line)
740 < indicate $\Delta E$ values indistinguishable from those obtained using
741 < {\sc spme}.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with
742 < different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ =
743 < inverted triangles).}
744 < \label{fig:delE}
745 < \end{figure}
746 <
747 < The most striking feature of this plot is how well the Shifted Force
748 < ({\sc sf}) and Shifted Potential ({\sc sp}) methods capture the energy
749 < differences.  For the undamped {\sc sf} method, and the
750 < moderately-damped {\sc sp} methods, the results are nearly
751 < indistinguishable from the Ewald results.  The other common methods do
752 < significantly less well.
753 <
754 < The unmodified cutoff method is essentially unusable.  This is not
755 < surprising since hard cutoffs give large energy fluctuations as atoms
756 < or molecules move in and out of the cutoff
757 < radius.\cite{Rahman71,Adams79} These fluctuations can be alleviated to
758 < some degree by using group based cutoffs with a switching
759 < function.\cite{Adams79,Steinbach94,Leach01} However, we do not see
760 < significant improvement using the group-switched cutoff because the
761 < salt and salt solution systems contain non-neutral groups.  Section
762 < \ref{sec:SystemResults} includes results for systems comprised entirely
763 < of neutral groups.
764 <
765 < For the {\sc sp} method, inclusion of electrostatic damping improves
766 < the agreement with Ewald, and using an $\alpha$ of 0.2\AA $^{-1}$
767 < shows an excellent correlation and quality of fit with the {\sc spme}
768 < results, particularly with a cutoff radius greater than 12
769 < \AA .  Use of a larger damping parameter is more helpful for the
770 < shortest cutoff shown, but it has a detrimental effect on simulations
771 < with larger cutoffs.  
772 <
773 < In the {\sc sf} sets, increasing damping results in progressively {\it
774 < worse} correlation with Ewald.  Overall, the undamped case is the best
775 < performing set, as the correlation and quality of fits are
776 < consistently superior regardless of the cutoff distance.  The undamped
777 < case is also less computationally demanding (because no evaluation of
778 < the complementary error function is required).
779 <
780 < The reaction field results illustrates some of that method's
781 < limitations, primarily that it was developed for use in homogenous
782 < systems; although it does provide results that are an improvement over
783 < those from an unmodified cutoff.
784 <
785 < \sub
786 <
787 < \subsection{Magnitudes of the Force and Torque Vectors}
788 <
789 < Evaluation of pairwise methods for use in Molecular Dynamics
790 < simulations requires consideration of effects on the forces and
791 < torques.  Figures \ref{fig:frcMag} and \ref{fig:trqMag} show the
792 < regression results for the force and torque vector magnitudes,
793 < respectively.  The data in these figures was generated from an
794 < accumulation of the statistics from all of the system types.
795 <
796 < \begin{figure}
797 < \centering
798 < \includegraphics[width=4.75in]{./figures/frcMagplot.pdf}
799 < \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the force vector
800 < magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the
801 < reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line)
802 < indicate force magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained
803 < using {\sc spme}.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with
804 < different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ =
805 < inverted triangles).}
806 < \label{fig:frcMag}
807 < \end{figure}
808 <
809 < Again, it is striking how well the Shifted Potential and Shifted Force
810 < methods are doing at reproducing the {\sc spme} forces.  The undamped and
811 < weakly-damped {\sc sf} method gives the best agreement with Ewald.
812 < This is perhaps expected because this method explicitly incorporates a
813 < smooth transition in the forces at the cutoff radius as well as the
814 < neutralizing image charges.
815 <
816 < Figure \ref{fig:frcMag}, for the most part, parallels the results seen
817 < in the previous $\Delta E$ section.  The unmodified cutoff results are
818 < poor, but using group based cutoffs and a switching function provides
819 < an improvement much more significant than what was seen with $\Delta
820 < E$.
821 <
822 < With moderate damping and a large enough cutoff radius, the {\sc sp}
823 < method is generating usable forces.  Further increases in damping,
824 < while beneficial for simulations with a cutoff radius of 9\AA\ , is
825 < detrimental to simulations with larger cutoff radii.
826 <
827 < The reaction field results are surprisingly good, considering the poor
828 < quality of the fits for the $\Delta E$ results.  There is still a
829 < considerable degree of scatter in the data, but the forces correlate
830 < well with the Ewald forces in general.  We note that the reaction
831 < field calculations do not include the pure NaCl systems, so these
832 < results are partly biased towards conditions in which the method
833 < performs more favorably.
834 <
835 < \begin{figure}
836 < \centering
837 < \includegraphics[width=4.75in]{./figures/trqMagplot.pdf}
838 < \caption{Statistical analysis of the quality of the torque vector
839 < magnitudes for a given electrostatic method compared with the
840 < reference Ewald sum.  Results with a value equal to 1 (dashed line)
841 < indicate torque magnitude values indistinguishable from those obtained
842 < using {\sc spme}.  Different values of the cutoff radius are indicated with
843 < different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares, and 15\AA\ =
844 < inverted triangles).}
845 < \label{fig:trqMag}
846 < \end{figure}
46 > \input{electrostaticsChapter}
47  
848 Molecular torques were only available from the systems which contained
849 rigid molecules (i.e. the systems containing water).  The data in
850 fig. \ref{fig:trqMag} is taken from this smaller sampling pool.
851
852 Torques appear to be much more sensitive to charges at a longer
853 distance.   The striking feature in comparing the new electrostatic
854 methods with {\sc spme} is how much the agreement improves with increasing
855 cutoff radius.  Again, the weakly damped and undamped {\sc sf} method
856 appears to be reproducing the {\sc spme} torques most accurately.  
857
858 Water molecules are dipolar, and the reaction field method reproduces
859 the effect of the surrounding polarized medium on each of the
860 molecular bodies. Therefore it is not surprising that reaction field
861 performs best of all of the methods on molecular torques.
862
863 \subsection{Directionality of the Force and Torque Vectors}
864
865 It is clearly important that a new electrostatic method can reproduce
866 the magnitudes of the force and torque vectors obtained via the Ewald
867 sum. However, the {\it directionality} of these vectors will also be
868 vital in calculating dynamical quantities accurately.  Force and
869 torque directionalities were investigated by measuring the angles
870 formed between these vectors and the same vectors calculated using
871 {\sc spme}.  The results (Fig. \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}) are compared through the
872 variance ($\sigma^2$) of the Gaussian fits of the angle error
873 distributions of the combined set over all system types.
874
875 \begin{figure}
876 \centering
877 \includegraphics[width=4.75in]{./figures/frcTrqAngplot.pdf}
878 \caption{Statistical analysis of the width of the angular distribution
879 that the force and torque vectors from a given electrostatic method
880 make with their counterparts obtained using the reference Ewald sum.
881 Results with a variance ($\sigma^2$) equal to zero (dashed line)
882 indicate force and torque directions indistinguishable from those
883 obtained using {\sc spme}.  Different values of the cutoff radius are
884 indicated with different symbols (9\AA\ = circles, 12\AA\ = squares,
885 and 15\AA\ = inverted triangles).}
886 \label{fig:frcTrqAng}
887 \end{figure}
888
889 Both the force and torque $\sigma^2$ results from the analysis of the
890 total accumulated system data are tabulated in figure
891 \ref{fig:frcTrqAng}. Here it is clear that the Shifted Potential ({\sc
892 sp}) method would be essentially unusable for molecular dynamics
893 unless the damping function is added.  The Shifted Force ({\sc sf})
894 method, however, is generating force and torque vectors which are
895 within a few degrees of the Ewald results even with weak (or no)
896 damping.
897
898 All of the sets (aside from the over-damped case) show the improvement
899 afforded by choosing a larger cutoff radius.  Increasing the cutoff
900 from 9 to 12\AA\ typically results in a halving of the width of the
901 distribution, with a similar improvement when going from 12 to 15
902 \AA .
903
904 The undamped {\sc sf}, group-based cutoff, and reaction field methods
905 all do equivalently well at capturing the direction of both the force
906 and torque vectors.  Using the electrostatic damping improves the
907 angular behavior significantly for the {\sc sp} and moderately for the
908 {\sc sf} methods.  Overdamping is detrimental to both methods.  Again
909 it is important to recognize that the force vectors cover all
910 particles in all seven systems, while torque vectors are only
911 available for neutral molecular groups.  Damping is more beneficial to
912 charged bodies, and this observation is investigated further in
913 section \ref{SystemResults}.
914
915 Although not discussed previously, group based cutoffs can be applied
916 to both the {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} methods.  The group-based cutoffs
917 will reintroduce small discontinuities at the cutoff radius, but the
918 effects of these can be minimized by utilizing a switching function.
919 Though there are no significant benefits or drawbacks observed in
920 $\Delta E$ and the force and torque magnitudes when doing this, there
921 is a measurable improvement in the directionality of the forces and
922 torques. Table \ref{tab:groupAngle} shows the angular variances
923 obtained both without (N) and with (Y) group based cutoffs and a
924 switching function.  Note that the $\alpha$ values have units of
925 \AA$^{-1}$ and the variance values have units of degrees$^2$.  The
926 {\sc sp} (with an $\alpha$ of 0.2\AA$^{-1}$ or smaller) shows much
927 narrower angular distributions when using group-based cutoffs. The
928 {\sc sf} method likewise shows improvement in the undamped and lightly
929 damped cases.
930
931 \begin{table}
932 \caption{STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ANGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS ($\sigma^2$)
933 THAT THE FORCE ({\it upper}) AND TORQUE ({\it lower}) VECTORS FROM A
934 GIVEN ELECTROSTATIC METHOD MAKE WITH THEIR COUNTERPARTS OBTAINED USING
935 THE REFERENCE EWALD SUMMATION}
936
937 \footnotesize
938 \begin{center}
939 \begin{tabular}{@{} ccrrrrrrrr @{}} \\
940 \toprule
941 \toprule
942
943 & &\multicolumn{4}{c}{Shifted Potential} & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Shifted
944 Force} \\
945 \cmidrule(lr){3-6} \cmidrule(l){7-10} $R_\textrm{c}$ & Groups &
946 $\alpha = 0$ & $\alpha = 0.1$ & $\alpha = 0.2$ & $\alpha = 0.3$ &
947 $\alpha = 0$ & $\alpha = 0.1$ & $\alpha = 0.2$ & $\alpha = 0.3$\\
948
949 \midrule
950    
951 9\AA   & N & 29.545 & 12.003 & 5.489 & 0.610 & 2.323 & 2.321 & 0.429 & 0.603 \\
952       & \textbf{Y} & \textbf{2.486} & \textbf{2.160} & \textbf{0.667} & \textbf{0.608} & \textbf{1.768} & \textbf{1.766} & \textbf{0.676} & \textbf{0.609} \\
953 12\AA  & N & 19.381 & 3.097 & 0.190 & 0.608 & 0.920 & 0.736 & 0.133 & 0.612 \\
954       & \textbf{Y} & \textbf{0.515} & \textbf{0.288} & \textbf{0.127} & \textbf{0.586} & \textbf{0.308} & \textbf{0.249} & \textbf{0.127} & \textbf{0.586} \\
955 15\AA  & N & 12.700 & 1.196 & 0.123 & 0.601 & 0.339 & 0.160 & 0.123 & 0.601 \\
956       & \textbf{Y} & \textbf{0.228} & \textbf{0.099} & \textbf{0.121} & \textbf{0.598} & \textbf{0.144} & \textbf{0.090} & \textbf{0.121} & \textbf{0.598} \\
957
958 \midrule
959      
960 9\AA   & N & 262.716 & 116.585 & 5.234 & 5.103 & 2.392 & 2.350 & 1.770 & 5.122 \\
961       & \textbf{Y} & \textbf{2.115} & \textbf{1.914} & \textbf{1.878} & \textbf{5.142} & \textbf{2.076} & \textbf{2.039} & \textbf{1.972} & \textbf{5.146} \\
962 12\AA  & N & 129.576 & 25.560 & 1.369 & 5.080 & 0.913 & 0.790 & 1.362 & 5.124 \\
963       & \textbf{Y} & \textbf{0.810} & \textbf{0.685} & \textbf{1.352} & \textbf{5.082} & \textbf{0.765} & \textbf{0.714} & \textbf{1.360} & \textbf{5.082} \\
964 15\AA  & N & 87.275 & 4.473 & 1.271 & 5.000 & 0.372 & 0.312 & 1.271 & 5.000 \\
965       & \textbf{Y} & \textbf{0.282} & \textbf{0.294} & \textbf{1.272} & \textbf{4.999} & \textbf{0.324} & \textbf{0.318} & \textbf{1.272} & \textbf{4.999} \\
966
967 \bottomrule
968 \end{tabular}
969 \end{center}
970 \label{tab:groupAngle}
971 \end{table}
972
973 One additional trend in table \ref{tab:groupAngle} is that the
974 $\sigma^2$ values for both {\sc sp} and {\sc sf} converge as $\alpha$
975 increases, something that is more obvious with group-based cutoffs.
976 The complimentary error function inserted into the potential weakens
977 the electrostatic interaction as the value of $\alpha$ is increased.
978 However, at larger values of $\alpha$, it is possible to overdamp the
979 electrostatic interaction and to remove it completely.  Kast
980 \textit{et al.}  developed a method for choosing appropriate $\alpha$
981 values for these types of electrostatic summation methods by fitting
982 to $g(r)$ data, and their methods indicate optimal values of 0.34,
983 0.25, and 0.16\AA$^{-1}$ for cutoff values of 9, 12, and 15\AA\
984 respectively.\cite{Kast03} These appear to be reasonable choices to
985 obtain proper MC behavior (Fig. \ref{fig:delE}); however, based on
986 these findings, choices this high would introduce error in the
987 molecular torques, particularly for the shorter cutoffs.  Based on our
988 observations, empirical damping up to 0.2\AA$^{-1}$ is beneficial,
989 but damping may be unnecessary when using the {\sc sf} method.
990
991 \subsection{Short-Time Dynamics: Velocity Autocorrelation Functions of NaCl Crystals}
992
993 Zahn {\it et al.} investigated the structure and dynamics of water
994 using eqs. (\ref{eq:ZahnPot}) and
995 (\ref{eq:WolfForces}).\cite{Zahn02,Kast03} Their results indicated
996 that a method similar (but not identical with) the damped {\sc sf}
997 method resulted in properties very similar to those obtained when
998 using the Ewald summation.  The properties they studied (pair
999 distribution functions, diffusion constants, and velocity and
1000 orientational correlation functions) may not be particularly sensitive
1001 to the long-range and collective behavior that governs the
1002 low-frequency behavior in crystalline systems.  Additionally, the
1003 ionic crystals are the worst case scenario for the pairwise methods
1004 because they lack the reciprocal space contribution contained in the
1005 Ewald summation.  
1006
1007 We are using two separate measures to probe the effects of these
1008 alternative electrostatic methods on the dynamics in crystalline
1009 materials.  For short- and intermediate-time dynamics, we are
1010 computing the velocity autocorrelation function, and for long-time
1011 and large length-scale collective motions, we are looking at the
1012 low-frequency portion of the power spectrum.
1013
1014 \begin{figure}
1015 \centering
1016 \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./figures/vCorrPlot.pdf}
1017 \caption{Velocity autocorrelation functions of NaCl crystals at
1018 1000K using {\sc spme}, {\sc sf} ($\alpha$ = 0.0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc
1019 sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2). The inset is a magnification of the area around
1020 the first minimum.  The times to first collision are nearly identical,
1021 but differences can be seen in the peaks and troughs, where the
1022 undamped and weakly damped methods are stiffer than the moderately
1023 damped and {\sc spme} methods.}
1024 \label{fig:vCorrPlot}
1025 \end{figure}
1026
1027 The short-time decay of the velocity autocorrelation function through
1028 the first collision are nearly identical in figure
1029 \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}, but the peaks and troughs of the functions show
1030 how the methods differ.  The undamped {\sc sf} method has deeper
1031 troughs (see inset in Fig. \ref{fig:vCorrPlot}) and higher peaks than
1032 any of the other methods.  As the damping parameter ($\alpha$) is
1033 increased, these peaks are smoothed out, and the {\sc sf} method
1034 approaches the {\sc spme} results.  With $\alpha$ values of 0.2\AA$^{-1}$,
1035 the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} functions are nearly identical and track the
1036 {\sc spme} features quite well.  This is not surprising because the {\sc sf}
1037 and {\sc sp} potentials become nearly identical with increased
1038 damping.  However, this appears to indicate that once damping is
1039 utilized, the details of the form of the potential (and forces)
1040 constructed out of the damped electrostatic interaction are less
1041 important.
1042
1043 \subsection{Collective Motion: Power Spectra of NaCl Crystals}
1044
1045 To evaluate how the differences between the methods affect the
1046 collective long-time motion, we computed power spectra from long-time
1047 traces of the velocity autocorrelation function. The power spectra for
1048 the best-performing alternative methods are shown in
1049 fig. \ref{fig:methodPS}.  Apodization of the correlation functions via
1050 a cubic switching function between 40 and 50 ps was used to reduce the
1051 ringing resulting from data truncation.  This procedure had no
1052 noticeable effect on peak location or magnitude.
1053
1054 \begin{figure}
1055 \centering
1056 \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./figures/spectraSquare.pdf}
1057 \caption{Power spectra obtained from the velocity auto-correlation
1058 functions of NaCl crystals at 1000K while using {\sc spme}, {\sc sf}
1059 ($\alpha$ = 0, 0.1, \& 0.2), and {\sc sp} ($\alpha$ = 0.2).  The inset
1060 shows the frequency region below 100 cm$^{-1}$ to highlight where the
1061 spectra differ.}
1062 \label{fig:methodPS}
1063 \end{figure}
1064
1065 While the high frequency regions of the power spectra for the
1066 alternative methods are quantitatively identical with Ewald spectrum,
1067 the low frequency region shows how the summation methods differ.
1068 Considering the low-frequency inset (expanded in the upper frame of
1069 figure \ref{fig:dampInc}), at frequencies below 100 cm$^{-1}$, the
1070 correlated motions are blue-shifted when using undamped or weakly
1071 damped {\sc sf}.  When using moderate damping ($\alpha = 0.2$
1072 \AA$^{-1}$) both the {\sc sf} and {\sc sp} methods give nearly identical
1073 correlated motion to the Ewald method (which has a convergence
1074 parameter of 0.3119\AA$^{-1}$).  This weakening of the electrostatic
1075 interaction with increased damping explains why the long-ranged
1076 correlated motions are at lower frequencies for the moderately damped
1077 methods than for undamped or weakly damped methods.
1078
1079 To isolate the role of the damping constant, we have computed the
1080 spectra for a single method ({\sc sf}) with a range of damping
1081 constants and compared this with the {\sc spme} spectrum.
1082 Fig. \ref{fig:dampInc} shows more clearly that increasing the
1083 electrostatic damping red-shifts the lowest frequency phonon modes.
1084 However, even without any electrostatic damping, the {\sc sf} method
1085 has at most a 10 cm$^{-1}$ error in the lowest frequency phonon mode.
1086 Without the {\sc sf} modifications, an undamped (pure cutoff) method
1087 would predict the lowest frequency peak near 325 cm$^{-1}$.  {\it
1088 Most} of the collective behavior in the crystal is accurately captured
1089 using the {\sc sf} method.  Quantitative agreement with Ewald can be
1090 obtained using moderate damping in addition to the shifting at the
1091 cutoff distance.
1092
1093 \begin{figure}
1094 \centering
1095 \includegraphics[width = \linewidth]{./figures/increasedDamping.pdf}
1096 \caption{Effect of damping on the two lowest-frequency phonon modes in
1097 the NaCl crystal at 1000K.  The undamped shifted force ({\sc sf})
1098 method is off by less than 10 cm$^{-1}$, and increasing the
1099 electrostatic damping to 0.25\AA$^{-1}$ gives quantitative agreement
1100 with the power spectrum obtained using the Ewald sum.  Overdamping can
1101 result in underestimates of frequencies of the long-wavelength
1102 motions.}
1103 \label{fig:dampInc}
1104 \end{figure}
1105
1106
48   \chapter{\label{chap:water}SIMPLE MODELS FOR WATER}
49  
50   \chapter{\label{chap:ice}PHASE BEHAVIOR OF WATER IN COMPUTER SIMULATIONS}
# Line 1116 | Line 57 | SIMULATIONS}
57   \backmatter
58  
59   \bibliographystyle{ndthesis}
60 < \bibliography{dissertation}          
60 > \bibliography{dissertation}  
61  
62   \end{document}
63  

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines