ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/fennellDissertation/waterChapter.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/fennellDissertation/waterChapter.tex (file contents):
Revision 2980 by chrisfen, Tue Aug 29 02:18:08 2006 UTC vs.
Revision 2981 by chrisfen, Tue Aug 29 23:34:48 2006 UTC

# Line 221 | Line 221 | step plots are shifted from the true energy baseline (
221   \caption{Energy conservation using both quaternion-based integration
222   and the {\sc dlm} method with increasing time step. The larger time
223   step plots are shifted from the true energy baseline (that of $\Delta
224 < t$ = 0.1fs) for clarity.}
224 > t$ = 0.1~fs) for clarity.}
225   \label{fig:timeStepIntegration}
226   \end{figure}
227  
# Line 239 | Line 239 | same configuration, and the only difference was the me
239   at various time steps for both {\sc dlm} and quaternion
240   integration. All of the 1000 SSD particle simulations started with the
241   same configuration, and the only difference was the method used to
242 < handle orientational motion. At time steps of 0.1 and 0.5fs, both
242 > handle orientational motion. At time steps of 0.1 and 0.5~fs, both
243   methods for propagating the orientational degrees of freedom conserve
244   energy fairly well, with the quaternion method showing a slight energy
245 < drift over time in the 0.5fs time step simulation. Time steps of 1 and
246 < 2fs clearly demonstrate the benefits in energy conservation that come
245 > drift over time in the 0.5~fs time step simulation. Time steps of 1 and
246 > 2~fs clearly demonstrate the benefits in energy conservation that come
247   with the {\sc dlm} method. Thus, while maintaining the same degree of
248   energy conservation, one can take considerably longer time steps,
249   leading to an overall reduction in computation time.
250  
251   Energy drifts in water simulations using {\sc dlm} integration were
252 < unnoticeable for time steps up to 3fs. We observed a slight energy
253 < drift on the order of 0.012~kcal/mol per nanosecond with a time step
254 < of 4fs. As expected, this drift increases dramatically with increasing
252 > unnoticeable for time steps up to 3~fs. We observed a slight energy
253 > drift on the order of 0.012~kcal/mol per nanosecond with a time step
254 > of 4~fs. As expected, this drift increases dramatically with increasing
255   time step. To insure accuracy in our {\it NVE} simulations, time steps
256 < were set at 2fs and were also kept at this value for {\it NPT}
256 > were set at 2~fs and were also kept at this value for {\it NPT}
257   simulations.
258  
259   Proton-disordered ice crystals in both the I$_\textrm{h}$ and
# Line 265 | Line 265 | freely about their fixed lattice positions with angula
265   orthorhombic in shape with an edge length ratio of approximately
266   1.00$\times$1.06$\times$1.23. We then allowed the particles to orient
267   freely about their fixed lattice positions with angular momenta values
268 < randomly sampled at 400K. The rotational temperature was then scaled
269 < down in stages to slowly cool the crystals to 25K. The particles were
268 > randomly sampled at 400~K. The rotational temperature was then scaled
269 > down in stages to slowly cool the crystals to 25~K. The particles were
270   then allowed to translate with fixed orientations at a constant
271 < pressure of 1atm for 50ps at 25K. Finally, all constraints were
272 < removed and the ice crystals were allowed to equilibrate for 50ps at
273 < 25K and a constant pressure of 1atm.  This procedure resulted in
271 > pressure of 1atm for 50~ps at 25~K. Finally, all constraints were
272 > removed and the ice crystals were allowed to equilibrate for 50~ps at
273 > 25~K and a constant pressure of 1atm.  This procedure resulted in
274   structurally stable I$_\textrm{h}$ ice crystals that obey the
275   Bernal-Fowler rules.\cite{Bernal33,Rahman72} This method was also
276   utilized in the making of diamond lattice I$_\textrm{c}$ ice crystals,
# Line 294 | Line 294 | acquired, each starting from different ice crystals ge
294  
295   An ensemble average from five separate melting simulations was
296   acquired, each starting from different ice crystals generated as
297 < described previously. All simulations were equilibrated for 100ps
298 < prior to a 200ps data collection run at each temperature setting. The
299 < temperature range of study spanned from 25 to 400K, with a maximum
300 < degree increment of 25K. For regions of interest along this stepwise
301 < progression, the temperature increment was decreased from 25K to 10
302 < and 5K.  The above equilibration and production times were sufficient
297 > described previously. All simulations were equilibrated for 100~ps
298 > prior to a 200~ps data collection run at each temperature setting. The
299 > temperature range of study spanned from 25 to 400~K, with a maximum
300 > degree increment of 25~K. For regions of interest along this stepwise
301 > progression, the temperature increment was decreased from 25~K to 10
302 > and 5~K.  The above equilibration and production times were sufficient
303   in that the fluctuations in the volume autocorrelation function damped
304 < out in all of the simulations in under 20ps.
304 > out in all of the simulations in under 20~ps.
305  
306   Our initial simulations focused on the original SSD water model, and
307   an average density versus temperature plot is shown in figure
308   \ref{fig:ssdDense}. Note that the density maximum when using a
309 < reaction field appears between 255 and 265K.  There were smaller
310 < fluctuations in the density at 260K than at either 255 or 265K, so we
309 > reaction field appears between 255 and 265~K.  There were smaller
310 > fluctuations in the density at 260~K than at either 255 or 265~K, so we
311   report this value as the location of the density maximum. Figure
312   \ref{fig:ssdDense} was constructed using ice I$_\textrm{h}$ crystals
313   for the initial configuration; though not pictured, the simulations
# Line 342 | Line 342 | effect of $R_\textrm{c}$, simulations were performed w
342   the cutoff radius ($R_\textrm{c}$), both with and without the use of a
343   reaction field.\cite{vanderSpoel98} In order to address the possible
344   effect of $R_\textrm{c}$, simulations were performed with a cutoff
345 < radius of 12\AA\, complementing the 9\AA\ $R_\textrm{c}$ used in the
345 > radius of 12~\AA\, complementing the 9~\AA\ $R_\textrm{c}$ used in the
346   previous SSD simulations. All of the resulting densities overlapped
347   within error and showed no significant trend toward lower or higher
348   densities in simulations both with and without reaction field.
# Line 351 | Line 351 | models at the same pressure, behavior which is especia
351   density scaling of SSD relative to other common models at any given
352   temperature. SSD assumes a lower density than any of the other listed
353   models at the same pressure, behavior which is especially apparent at
354 < temperatures greater than 300K. Lower than expected densities have
354 > temperatures greater than 300~K. Lower than expected densities have
355   been observed for other systems using a reaction field for long-range
356   electrostatic interactions, so the most likely reason for the reduced
357   densities is the presence of the reaction
# Line 364 | Line 364 | decreasing densities at higher temperatures; however,
364   water. The shape of the curve is similar to the curve produced from
365   SSD simulations using reaction field, specifically the rapidly
366   decreasing densities at higher temperatures; however, a shift in the
367 < density maximum location, down to 245K, is observed. This is a more
367 > density maximum location, down to 245~K, is observed. This is a more
368   accurate comparison to the other listed water models, in that no long
369   range corrections were applied in those
370   simulations.\cite{Baez94,Jorgensen98b} However, even without the
371 < reaction field, the density around 300K is still significantly lower
371 > reaction field, the density around 300~K is still significantly lower
372   than experiment and comparable water models. This anomalous behavior
373   was what lead Tan {\it et al.} to recently reparametrize
374   SSD.\cite{Tan03} Throughout the remainder of the paper our
# Line 383 | Line 383 | temperature. Simulations started with randomized veloc
383   NVE} simulations were performed at the average densities obtained from
384   the {\it NPT} simulations at an identical target
385   temperature. Simulations started with randomized velocities and
386 < underwent 50ps of temperature scaling and 50ps of constant energy
387 < equilibration before a 200ps data collection run. Diffusion constants
386 > underwent 50~ps of temperature scaling and 50~ps of constant energy
387 > equilibration before a 200~ps data collection run. Diffusion constants
388   were calculated via linear fits to the long-time behavior of the
389   mean-square displacement as a function of time.\cite{Allen87} The
390   averaged results from five sets of {\it NVE} simulations are displayed
# Line 408 | Line 408 | supercooled and liquid regimes.  SPC/E does a respecta
408   strengths of the SSD model. Of the three models shown, the SSD model
409   has the most accurate depiction of self-diffusion in both the
410   supercooled and liquid regimes.  SPC/E does a respectable job by
411 < reproducing values similar to experiment around 290K; however, it
411 > reproducing values similar to experiment around 290~K; however, it
412   deviates at both higher and lower temperatures, failing to predict the
413   correct thermal trend. TIP5P and SSD both start off low at colder
414   temperatures and tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures.
# Line 427 | Line 427 | of the 1024 particle ice I$_\textrm{h}$ simulations, a
427   pressure heat capacity ($C_\textrm{p}$) was monitored to locate
428   $T_\textrm{m}$ in each of the simulations. In the melting simulations
429   of the 1024 particle ice I$_\textrm{h}$ simulations, a large spike in
430 < $C_\textrm{p}$ occurs at 245K, indicating a first order phase
430 > $C_\textrm{p}$ occurs at 245~K, indicating a first order phase
431   transition for the melting of these ice crystals (see figure
432   \ref{fig:ssdCp}. When the reaction field is turned off, the melting
433 < transition occurs at 235K.  These melting transitions are considerably
434 < lower than the experimental value of 273K, indicating that the solid
433 > transition occurs at 235~K.  These melting transitions are considerably
434 > lower than the experimental value of 273~K, indicating that the solid
435   ice I$_\textrm{h}$ is not thermodynamically preferred relative to the
436   liquid state at these lower temperatures.
437   \begin{figure}
438   \centering
439   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/ssdCp.pdf}
440   \caption{Heat capacity versus temperature for the SSD model with an
441 < active reaction field. Note the large spike in $C_p$ around 245K,
441 > active reaction field. Note the large spike in $C_p$ around 245~K,
442   indicating a phase transition from the ordered crystal to disordered
443   liquid.}
444   \label{fig:ssdCp}
# Line 448 | Line 448 | liquid.}
448   \centering
449   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/fullContour.pdf}
450   \caption{ Contour plots of 2D angular pair correlation functions for
451 < 512 SSD molecules at 100K (A \& B) and 300K (C \& D). Dark areas
451 > 512 SSD molecules at 100~K (A \& B) and 300~K (C \& D). Dark areas
452   signify regions of enhanced density while light areas signify
453   depletion relative to the bulk density. White areas have pair
454   correlation values below 0.5 and black areas have values above 1.5.}
# Line 502 | Line 502 | blend together to form one observable peak. At higher
502   $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$.\cite{Liu96b} At low temperatures, the second
503   solvation shell peak appears to have two distinct components that
504   blend together to form one observable peak. At higher temperatures,
505 < this split character alters to show the leading 4\AA\ peak dominated
505 > this split character alters to show the leading 4~\AA\ peak dominated
506   by equatorial anti-parallel dipole orientations. There is also a
507   tightly bunched group of axially arranged dipoles that most likely
508   consist of the smaller fraction of aligned dipole pairs. The trailing
509 < component of the split peak at 5\AA\ is dominated by aligned dipoles
509 > component of the split peak at 5~\AA\ is dominated by aligned dipoles
510   that assume hydrogen bond arrangements similar to those seen in the
511   first solvation shell. This evidence indicates that the dipole pair
512   interaction begins to dominate outside of the range of the dipolar
513   repulsion term.  The energetically favorable dipole arrangements
514   populate the region immediately outside this repulsion region (around
515 < 4\AA), while arrangements that seek to satisfy both the sticky and
515 > 4~\AA), while arrangements that seek to satisfy both the sticky and
516   dipole forces locate themselves just beyond this initial buildup
517 < (around 5\AA).
517 > (around 5~\AA).
518  
519   This analysis indicates that the split second peak is primarily the
520   product of the dipolar repulsion term of the sticky potential. In
521   fact, the inner peak can be pushed out and merged with the outer split
522   peak just by extending the switching function ($s^\prime(r_{ij})$)
523 < from its normal 4\AA\ cutoff to values of 4.5 or even 5\AA. This
523 > from its normal 4~\AA\ cutoff to values of 4.5 or even 5~\AA. This
524   type of correction is not recommended for improving the liquid
525   structure, since the second solvation shell would still be shifted too
526   far out. In addition, this would have an even more detrimental effect
# Line 557 | Line 557 | the liquid structure in simulations without a long-ran
557   \caption{PARAMETERS FOR THE ORIGINAL AND ADJUSTED SSD MODELS}
558  
559   \centering
560 < \begin{tabular}{ lcccc }
560 > \begin{tabular}{ llcccc }
561   \toprule
562   \toprule
563 < Parameters & SSD & SSD1 & SSD/E & SSD/RF \\
563 > Parameters & & SSD & SSD1 & SSD/E & SSD/RF \\
564   \midrule
565 < $\sigma$ (\AA)  & 3.051 & 3.016 & 3.035 & 3.019\\
566 < $\epsilon$ (kcal/mol) & 0.152 & 0.152 & 0.152 & 0.152\\
567 < $\mu$ (D) & 2.35 & 2.35 & 2.42 & 2.48\\
568 < $\nu_0$ (kcal/mol) & 3.7284 & 3.6613 & 3.90 & 3.90\\
569 < $\omega^\circ$ & 0.07715 & 0.07715 & 0.07715 & 0.07715\\
570 < $r_l$ (\AA) & 2.75 & 2.75 & 2.40 & 2.40\\
571 < $r_u$ (\AA) & 3.35 & 3.35 & 3.80 & 3.80\\
572 < $r_l^\prime$ (\AA) & 2.75 & 2.75 & 2.75 & 2.75\\
573 < $r_u^\prime$ (\AA) & 4.00 & 4.00 & 3.35 & 3.35\\
565 > $\sigma$ & (\AA)  & 3.051 & 3.016 & 3.035 & 3.019\\
566 > $\epsilon$ & (kcal mol$^{-1}$) & 0.152 & 0.152 & 0.152 & 0.152\\
567 > $\mu$ & (D) & 2.35 & 2.35 & 2.42 & 2.48\\
568 > $\nu_0$ & (kcal mol$^{-1}$) & 3.7284 & 3.6613 & 3.90 & 3.90\\
569 > $\omega^\circ$ & & 0.07715 & 0.07715 & 0.07715 & 0.07715\\
570 > $r_l$ & (\AA) & 2.75 & 2.75 & 2.40 & 2.40\\
571 > $r_u$ & (\AA) & 3.35 & 3.35 & 3.80 & 3.80\\
572 > $r_l^\prime$ & (\AA) & 2.75 & 2.75 & 2.75 & 2.75\\
573 > $r_u^\prime$ & (\AA) & 4.00 & 4.00 & 3.35 & 3.35\\
574   \bottomrule
575   \end{tabular}
576   \label{tab:ssdParams}
# Line 632 | Line 632 | allowing the persistence of full dipolar character bel
632   bonds''. Aside from improving the shape of the first peak in the
633   $g(r)$, this modification improves the densities considerably by
634   allowing the persistence of full dipolar character below the previous
635 < 4\AA\ cutoff.
635 > 4~\AA\ cutoff.
636  
637   While adjusting the location and shape of the first peak of $g(r)$
638   improves the densities, these changes alone are insufficient to bring
# Line 664 | Line 664 | described previously. Each {\it NPT} simulation was eq
664   simulations of 1024 particle systems, and the melting sequences were
665   started from different ice I$_\textrm{h}$ crystals constructed as
666   described previously. Each {\it NPT} simulation was equilibrated for
667 < 100ps before a 200ps data collection run at each temperature step,
667 > 100~ps before a 200~ps data collection run at each temperature step,
668   and the final configuration from the previous temperature simulation
669   was used as a starting point. All {\it NVE} simulations had the same
670   thermalization, equilibration, and data collection times as stated
# Line 686 | Line 686 | significantly over the original SSD model (see figure
686   calculated densities for both SSD/E and SSD1 have increased
687   significantly over the original SSD model (see figure
688   \ref{fig:ssdDense}) and are in better agreement with the experimental
689 < values. At 298 K, the densities of SSD/E and SSD1 without a long-range
690 < correction are 0.996 g/cm$^3$ and 0.999 g/cm$^3$ respectively.  These
691 < both compare well with the experimental value of 0.997 g/cm$^3$, and
692 < they are considerably better than the SSD value of 0.967 g/cm$^3$. The
689 > values. At 298~K, the densities of SSD/E and SSD1 without a long-range
690 > correction are 0.996~g/cm$^3$ and 0.999~g/cm$^3$ respectively.  These
691 > both compare well with the experimental value of 0.997~g/cm$^3$, and
692 > they are considerably better than the SSD value of 0.967~g/cm$^3$. The
693   changes to the dipole moment and sticky switching functions have
694   improved the structuring of the liquid (as seen in figure
695   \ref{fig:gofrCompare}), but they have shifted the density maximum to
# Line 698 | Line 698 | transition. By monitoring $C_p$ throughout these simul
698   strengthening of the dipolar character. However, this increasing
699   disorder in the SSD/E model has little effect on the melting
700   transition. By monitoring $C_p$ throughout these simulations, we
701 < observed a melting transition for SSD/E at 235K, the same as SSD and
701 > observed a melting transition for SSD/E at 235~K, the same as SSD and
702   SSD1.
703  
704   \begin{figure}
# Line 719 | Line 719 | of SSD/RF and SSD1 show a dramatic increase over norma
719   with an active reaction field is shown in figure \ref{fig:ssdrfDense}.
720   As observed in the simulations without a reaction field, the densities
721   of SSD/RF and SSD1 show a dramatic increase over normal SSD (see
722 < figure \ref{fig:ssdDense}). At 298 K, SSD/RF has a density of 0.997
722 > figure \ref{fig:ssdDense}). At 298~K, SSD/RF has a density of 0.997
723   g/cm$^3$, directly in line with experiment and considerably better
724 < than the original SSD value of 0.941 g/cm$^3$ and the SSD1 value of
725 < 0.972 g/cm$^3$. These results further emphasize the importance of
724 > than the original SSD value of 0.941~g/cm$^3$ and the SSD1 value of
725 > 0.972~g/cm$^3$. These results further emphasize the importance of
726   reparametrization in order to model the density properly under
727   different simulation conditions.  Again, these changes have only a
728 < minor effect on the melting point, which observed at 245K for SSD/RF,
729 < is identical to SSD and only 5K lower than SSD1 with a reaction
728 > minor effect on the melting point, which observed at 245~K for SSD/RF,
729 > is identical to SSD and only 5~K lower than SSD1 with a reaction
730   field. Additionally, the difference in density maxima is not as
731 < extreme, with SSD/RF showing a density maximum at 255K, fairly close
732 < to the density maxima of 260K and 265K, shown by SSD and SSD1
731 > extreme, with SSD/RF showing a density maximum at 255~K, fairly close
732 > to the density maxima of 260~K and 265~K, shown by SSD and SSD1
733   respectively.
734  
735   \subsection{Transport Behavior}
# Line 758 | Line 758 | remains lower than experiment until relatively high te
758   from their respective {\it NPT} simulations at 1 atm. The diffusion
759   constant for SSD/E is consistently higher than experiment, while SSD1
760   remains lower than experiment until relatively high temperatures
761 < (around 360K). Both models follow the shape of the experimental curve
762 < below 300K but tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures, as
763 < seen in SSD1 crossing above 360K.  This increasing diffusion relative
761 > (around 360~K). Both models follow the shape of the experimental curve
762 > below 300~K but tend to diffuse too rapidly at higher temperatures, as
763 > seen in SSD1 crossing above 360~K.  This increasing diffusion relative
764   to the experimental values is caused by the rapidly decreasing system
765   density with increasing temperature.  Both SSD1 and SSD/E show this
766   deviation in particle mobility, but this trend has different
# Line 793 | Line 793 | more slowly at low temperatures and deviates to diffus
793   throughout most of the temperature range shown and exhibiting only a
794   slight increasing trend at higher temperatures. SSD1 tends to diffuse
795   more slowly at low temperatures and deviates to diffuse too rapidly at
796 < temperatures greater than 330K.  As stated above, this deviation away
796 > temperatures greater than 330~K.  As stated above, this deviation away
797   from the ideal trend is due to a rapid decrease in density at higher
798   temperatures. SSD/RF does not suffer from this problem as much as SSD1
799   because the calculated densities are closer to the experimental
# Line 866 | Line 866 | performed at the ambient conditions for each of the re
866   regime ($t > \tau_l$).\cite{Rothschild84} Calculation of these time
867   constants were averaged over five detailed {\it NVE} simulations
868   performed at the ambient conditions for each of the respective
869 < models. It should be noted that the commonly cited value of 1.9 ps for
869 > models. It should be noted that the commonly cited value of 1.9~ps for
870   $\tau_2$ was determined from the NMR data in Ref. \cite{Krynicki66} at
871   a temperature near 34$^\circ$C.\cite{Rahman71} Because of the strong
872   temperature dependence of $\tau_2$, it is necessary to recalculate it
873 < at 298K to make proper comparisons. The value shown in Table
873 > at 298~K to make proper comparisons. The value shown in Table
874   \ref{tab:liquidProperties} was calculated from the same NMR data in the
875   fashion described in Ref. \cite{Krynicki66}. Similarly, $\tau_1$ was
876 < recomputed for 298K from the data in Ref. \cite{Eisenberg69}.
876 > recomputed for 298~K from the data in Ref. \cite{Eisenberg69}.
877   Again, SSD/E and SSD/RF show improved behavior over SSD1, both with
878   and without an active reaction field. Turning on the reaction field
879   leads to much improved time constants for SSD1; however, these results
# Line 882 | Line 882 | can be attributed to the use of the Ewald sum.\cite{Ch
882   paper are smaller than the values observed here, and this difference
883   can be attributed to the use of the Ewald sum.\cite{Chandra99}
884  
885 < \subsection{SSD/RF and Damped Electrostatics}
885 > \subsection{SSD/RF and Damped Electrostatics}\label{sec:ssdrfDamped}
886  
887   In section \ref{sec:dampingMultipoles}, a method was described for
888   applying the damped {\sc sf} or {\sc sp} techniques to for systems
# Line 906 | Line 906 | CORRECTION METHODS}
906   \toprule
907   \toprule
908   & & Reaction Field & Damped Electrostatics & Experiment [Ref.] \\
909 < & & $\epsilon = 80$ & $\alpha = 0.2125$\AA$^{-1}$ & \\
909 > & & $\epsilon = 80$ & $\alpha = 0.2125$~\AA$^{-1}$ & \\
910   \midrule
911   $\rho$ & (g cm$^{-3}$) & 0.997(1) & 1.004(4) & 0.997 \cite{CRC80}\\
912   $C_p$ & (cal mol$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$) & 23.8(2) & 27(1) & 18.005 \cite{Wagner02} \\
913   $D$ & ($10^{-5}$ cm$^2$ s$^{-1}$) & 2.32(6) & 2.33(2) & 2.299 \cite{Mills73}\\
914 < $n_C$ & & 4.4 & 4.4 & 4.7 \cite{Hura00}\\
914 > $n_C$ & & 4.4 & 4.2 & 4.7 \cite{Hura00}\\
915   $n_H$ & & 3.7 & 3.7 & 3.5 \cite{Soper86}\\
916   $\tau_1$ & (ps) & 7.2(4) & 5.86(8) & 5.7 \cite{Eisenberg69}\\
917   $\tau_2$ & (ps) & 3.2(2) & 2.45(7) & 2.3 \cite{Krynicki66}\\
# Line 937 | Line 937 | homogeneous systems, SSD/RF can be used effectively wi
937   encouraging result because of the more varied applicability of damping
938   over the reaction field technique. Rather than be limited to
939   homogeneous systems, SSD/RF can be used effectively with mixed
940 < systems, such as dissolved ions, small organic molecules, or even
940 > systems, such as dissolved ions, dissolved organic molecules, or even
941   proteins.
942  
943   In addition to the properties tabulated in table
944   \ref{tab:dampedSSDRF}, we calculated the static dielectric constant
945 < from a 5ns simulation of SSD/RF using the damped electrostatics. The
945 > from a 5~ns simulation of SSD/RF using the damped electrostatics. The
946   resulting value of 82.6(6) compares very favorably with the
947   experimental value of 78.3.\cite{Malmberg56} This value is closer to
948   the experimental value than what was expected according to figure
# Line 952 | Line 952 | nature of contour plotting.
952  
953   \section{Tetrahedrally Restructured Elongated Dipole (TRED) Water Model}
954  
955 < The SSD/RF model works well with damped electrostatics, but because of its point multipole character, there is no charge neutralization correction at $R_\textrm{c}$. This has the effect of increasing the density, since there is no consideration of the ``surroundings''.
955 > The SSD/RF model works well with damped electrostatics, but because of
956 > its point multipole character, there is no charge neutralization
957 > correction at $R_\textrm{c}$. This has the effect of increasing the
958 > density, since there is no consideration of the ``surroundings''. In
959 > an attempt to optimize a water model for these conditions, we decided
960 > to both simplify the parameters of the SSD type models and break the
961 > point dipole into a charge pair so that it will gain some effect from
962 > the shifting action in the {\sc sf} technique. This process resulted
963 > in a two-point model that we are calling the Tetrahedrally
964 > Restructured Elongated Dipole (TRED) water model.
965  
966 + \begin{figure}
967 + \centering
968 + \includegraphics[width=2.75in]{./figures/tredLayout.pdf}
969 + \caption{Geometry of TRED water. In this two-point model, the origin
970 + is the center-of-mass of the water molecule with the same moments of
971 + inertia as SSD/RF. The negatively charged site at the origin is also
972 + both a Lennard-Jones and sticky interaction site.}
973 + \label{fig:tredLayout}
974 + \end{figure}
975   \begin{table}
976 + \centering
977 + \caption{PARAMETERS FOR THE TRED WATER MODEL}
978 + \begin{tabular}{ llr }
979 + \toprule
980 + \toprule
981 + $\sigma$ & (\AA) & 2.980 \\
982 + $\epsilon$ & (kcal mol$^{-1}$) & 0.2045 \\
983 + $q$ & ($e$) & 1.041 \\
984 + $v_0$ & (kcal mol$^{-1}$) & 4.22 \\
985 + $\omega^\circ$ & & 0.07715 \\
986 + $r_l$ \& $r_l^\prime$ & (\AA) & 2.4 \\
987 + $r_u$ \& $r_u^\prime$ & (\AA) & 4.0 \\
988 + Q$_xx$ & (D \AA) & -1.682 \\
989 + Q$_yy$ & (D \AA) & 1.762 \\
990 + Q$_zz$ & (D \AA) & -0.080 \\
991 + \bottomrule
992 + \end{tabular}
993 + \label{tab:tredParams}
994 + \end{table}
995 + \begin{figure}
996 + \centering
997 + \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{./figures/tredGofR.pdf}
998 + \caption{The $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ for TRED water. The first peak has a
999 + closer to the experimental plot; however, the second and third peaks
1000 + exhibit a more expanded structure similar to SSD/RF. The minimum
1001 + following the first peak is located at 3.55~\AA , which is further out
1002 + than both experiment and SSD/RF (3.42 and 3.3~\AA\ respectively),
1003 + leading to a larger coordination number. If all the curves were
1004 + integrated to the experimental minimum, the $n_C$ results would all be
1005 + similar, with TRED having an $n_C$ only 0.2 larger than experiment.}
1006 + \label{fig:tredGofR}
1007 + \end{figure}
1008 + The geometric layout of TRED water is shown in figure
1009 + \ref{fig:tredLayout} and the electrostatic, Lennard-Jones, and sticky
1010 + parameters are displayed in table \ref{tab:tredParams}. The negatively
1011 + charged site is located at the center of mass of the molecule and is
1012 + also home to the Lennard-Jones and sticky interactions. The charge
1013 + separation distance of 0.5~\AA\ along the dipolar ($z$) axis combined
1014 + with the charge magnitude ($q$) results in a dipole moment of
1015 + 2.5~D. This value is simply the value used for SSD/RF (2.48~D) rounded
1016 + to the tenths place. We also unified the sticky parameters for the
1017 + switching functions on the repulsive and attractive interactions in
1018 + the interest of simplicity, and we left the quadrupole moment elements
1019 + and $\omega^\circ$ unaltered. Finally, the strength of the sticky
1020 + interaction ($v_0$) was modified to improve the shape of the first
1021 + peaks in $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ and $g_\textrm{OH}(r)$, while the $\sigma$
1022 + and $\epsilon$ values were varied to adjust the location of the first
1023 + peak of $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ (see figure \ref{fig:tredGofR}) and the
1024 + density. The $\sigma$ and $epsilon$ optimization was carried out by
1025 + separating the Lennard-Jones potential into near entirely repulsive
1026 + ($A$) and attractive ($C$) parts, such that
1027 + \begin{equation}
1028 + \sigma = \left(\frac{A}{C}\right)^\frac{1}{6},
1029 + \end{equation}
1030 + and
1031 + \begin{equation}
1032 + \epsilon = \frac{C^2}{4A}.
1033 + \end{equation}
1034 + The location of the peak is adjusted through $A$, while the
1035 + interaction strength is modified through $C$. All of the above changes
1036 + were made with the goal of capturing the experimental density and
1037 + translational diffusion constant at 298~K and 1~atm.
1038 +
1039 + Being that TRED is a two-point water model, we expect its
1040 + computational efficiency to fall some place in between the single and
1041 + three-point water models. In comparative simulations, TRED was
1042 + approximately 85\% slower than SSD/RF, while SPC/E was 225\% slower
1043 + than SSD/RF. While TRED loses some of the performance advantage of
1044 + SSD, it is still nearly twice as computationally efficient as SPC/E
1045 + and TIP3P.
1046 +
1047 + \begin{table}
1048   \caption{PROPERTIES OF TRED COMPARED WITH SSD/RF AND EXPERIMENT}
1049   \footnotesize
1050   \centering
# Line 962 | Line 1052 | The SSD/RF model works well with damped electrostatics
1052   \toprule
1053   \toprule
1054   & & SSD/RF & TRED & Experiment [Ref.]\\
1055 < & & $\alpha = 0.2125$\AA$^{-1}$ & $\alpha = 0.2125$\AA$^{-1}$ & \\
1055 > & & $\alpha = 0.2125$~\AA$^{-1}$ & $\alpha = 0.2125$~\AA$^{-1}$ & \\
1056   \midrule
1057   $\rho$ & (g cm$^{-3}$) & 1.004(4) & 0.995(5) & 0.997 \cite{CRC80}\\
1058   $C_p$ & (cal mol$^{-1}$ K$^{-1}$) & 27(1) & 23(1) & 18.005 \cite{Wagner02} \\
1059   $D$ & ($10^{-5}$ cm$^2$ s$^{-1}$) & 2.33(2) & 2.30(5) & 2.299 \cite{Mills73}\\
1060 < $n_C$ & & 4.4 & 5.3 & 4.7 \cite{Hura00}\\
1060 > $n_C$ & & 4.2 & 5.3 & 4.7 \cite{Hura00}\\
1061   $n_H$ & & 3.7 & 4.1 & 3.5 \cite{Soper86}\\
1062   $\tau_1$ & (ps) & 5.86(8) & 6.0(1) & 5.7 \cite{Eisenberg69}\\
1063   $\tau_2$ & (ps) & 2.45(7) & 2.49(5) & 2.3 \cite{Krynicki66}\\
# Line 975 | Line 1065 | $\tau_D$ & (ps) & 9.1(2) & 10.6(3) & 8.2(4) \cite{Kind
1065   $\tau_D$ & (ps) & 9.1(2) & 10.6(3) & 8.2(4) \cite{Kindt96}\\
1066   \bottomrule
1067   \end{tabular}
1068 < \label{tab:tredProps}
1068 > \label{tab:tredProperties}
1069   \end{table}
1070 + We calculated thermodynamic and dynamic properties in the same manner
1071 + described in section \ref{sec:ssdrfDamped} for SSD/RF, and the results
1072 + are presented in table \ref{tab:tredProperties}. These results show that
1073 + TRED improves upon the $\rho$ and $C_p$ properties of SSD/RF with
1074 + damped electrostatics while maintaining the excellent dynamics
1075 + behavior of both the translational self-diffusivity and the
1076 + reorientational time constants, $\tau_1$ and $\tau_2$. The structural
1077 + results show some differences between the two models. Despite the
1078 + improved peak shape for the first solvation shell (see figure
1079 + \ref{fig:tredGofR}), $n_C$ and $n_H$ counts increase because of the
1080 + further first minimum distance locations. This results in the
1081 + integration extending over a larger water volume. If we integrate to
1082 + the first minimum value of the experimental $g_\textrm{OO}(r)$ (3.42
1083 + \AA ) in both the SSD/RF and TRED plots, the $n_C$ values for both are
1084 + much closer to experiment (4.7 for SSD/RF and 4.9 for TRED).
1085  
1086 + \begin{figure}
1087 + \centering
1088 + \includegraphics[width=3in]{./figures/tredDielectric.pdf}
1089 + \caption{Contour map of the dielectric constant for TRED as a function
1090 + of damping parameter and cutoff radius. The dielectric behavior for TRED
1091 + is very similar to SSD/RF (see figure \ref{fig:dielectricMap}D), which
1092 + is to be expected due to the similar dipole moment and sticky interaction
1093 + strength.}
1094 + \label{fig:tredDielectric}
1095 + \end{figure}
1096 + A comparison of the dielectric behavior was also included at the
1097 + bottom of table \ref{tab:tredProperties}. The static dielectric
1098 + constant results for SSD/RF and TRED are identical within error. This
1099 + is not surprising given the similar dipole moment, similar sticky
1100 + interaction strength, and identical applied damping constant. Comparing the static dielectric constant contour map (figure \ref{fig:tredDielectric}) with the dielectric map for SSD/RF
1101 +
1102   \section{Conclusions}
1103  
1104   In the above sections, the density maximum and temperature dependence
1105   of the self-diffusion constant were studied for the SSD water model,
1106   both with and without the use of reaction field, via a series of {\it
1107   NPT} and {\it NVE} simulations. The constant pressure simulations
1108 < showed a density maximum near 260K. In most cases, the calculated
1108 > showed a density maximum near 260~K. In most cases, the calculated
1109   densities were significantly lower than the densities obtained from
1110   other water models (and experiment). Analysis of self-diffusion showed
1111   SSD to capture the transport properties of water well in both the
# Line 999 | Line 1120 | interactions.  
1120   when changing the method of calculating long-range electrostatic
1121   interactions.  
1122  
1123 < These simple water models are excellent choices for representing
1124 < explicit water in large scale simulations of biochemical systems. They
1125 < are more computationally efficient than the common charge based water
1126 < models, and, in many cases, exhibit more realistic bulk phase fluid
1127 < properties. These models are one of the few cases in which maximizing
1128 < efficiency does not result in a loss in realistic representation.
1123 > The simple water models investigated here are excellent choices for
1124 > representing explicit water in large scale simulations of biochemical
1125 > systems. They are more computationally efficient than the common
1126 > charge based water models, and, in many cases, exhibit more realistic
1127 > bulk phase fluid properties. These models are one of the few cases in
1128 > which maximizing efficiency does not result in a loss in realistic
1129 > representation.

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines