| 113 |
|
J_{z}(p_{x})=-\lambda_{ice}v_{x}(y_{ice}). |
| 114 |
|
\end{equation} |
| 115 |
|
|
| 116 |
< |
In Figure \ref{fig:CoeffFric}, the average velocity of the ice is plotted against the imposed momentum flux for the basal (black circles) and prismatic (red circles) systems. From the equation above, the slope of the linear fit of the data is $\lamda_{wall}$. The coefficient of friction of the interface for the basal face was calculated to be 11.02808 $\pm$ 0.4489844 (units), and the $\lambda_{wall}$ for the prismatic face was determined to be 19.95948, $\pm$ 0.5370894 (units). |
| 116 |
> |
In Figure \ref{fig:CoeffFric}, the average velocity of the ice is plotted against the imposed momentum flux for the basal (black circles) and prismatic (red circles) systems. From the equation above, the slope of the linear fit of the data is $\lamda_{wall}$. The coefficient of friction of the interface for the basal face was calculated to be 11.0 $\pm$ 0.4 \AA^{-2}fs^{-1}, and the $\lambda_{wall}$ for the prismatic face was determined to be 19.9, $\pm$ 0.5 \AA^{-2}fs^{-1}. |
| 117 |
|
|
| 118 |
|
%Ask dan about truncating versus rounding the values for lambda. |
| 119 |
+ |
%The coefficient of friction of the interface for the basal face was calculated to be 11.02808 $\pm$ 0.4489844 \AA^{-2}fs^{-1}, and the $\lambda_{wall}$ for the prismatic face was determined to be 19.95948, $\pm$ 0.5370894 \AA^{-2}fs^{-1}. |
| 120 |
|
|
| 121 |
+ |
|
| 122 |
|
\section{Conclusion} |
| 123 |
|
Write your conclusion here. |
| 124 |
|
|
