ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceWater/iceWater.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceWater/iceWater.tex (file contents):
Revision 3945 by gezelter, Tue Sep 3 21:16:58 2013 UTC vs.
Revision 3966 by plouden, Wed Oct 23 17:29:18 2013 UTC

# Line 1 | Line 1
1 < \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
2 < \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
3 < \usepackage{achemso}
4 < \usepackage{natbib}
1 > \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2 > \usepackage{amsmath}
3 > \usepackage{amssymb}
4 > \usepackage{setspace}
5 > %\usepackage{endfloat}
6 > \usepackage{caption}
7 > %\usepackage{epsf}
8 > %\usepackage{tabularx}
9 > \usepackage{graphicx}
10   \usepackage{multirow}
11   \usepackage{wrapfig}
12 < \usepackage{fixltx2e}
13 < %\mciteErrorOnUnknownfalse
12 > %\usepackage{booktabs}
13 > %\usepackage{bibentry}
14 > %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
15 > %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
16 > \usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib}
17 > \usepackage{url}
18 > \pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm
19 > \evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight
20 > 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000
21  
22 + % double space list of tables and figures
23 + %\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}}
24 + \setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt}
25 + \setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt}
26 +
27 + %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional referenc note
28 + \bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;}
29 + \bibliographystyle{aip}
30 +
31 +
32 + % \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso}
33 + % \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true}
34 + % \usepackage{achemso}
35 + % \usepackage{natbib}
36 + % \usepackage{multirow}
37 + % \usepackage{wrapfig}
38 + % \usepackage{fixltx2e}
39 +
40   \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}  % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions
41   \usepackage{url}
42  
43  
44 < \title{Solid-liquid friction at ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ / water interfaces}
44 > \begin{document}
45  
46 < \author{P. B. Louden}
47 < \author{J. Daniel Gezelter}
18 < \email{gezelter@nd.edu}
19 < \affiliation[University of Notre Dame]{251 Nieuwland Science Hall\\
20 <  Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre
21 <  Dame\\ Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
46 > \title{Simulations of solid-liquid friction at ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ /
47 >  water interfaces}
48  
49 < \keywords{}
49 > \author{Patrick B. Louden and J. Daniel
50 > Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail:
51 >  gezelter@nd.edu} \\
52 > Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\
53 > University of Notre Dame\\
54 > Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
55  
56 < \begin{document}
56 > \date{\today}
57 > \maketitle
58 > \begin{doublespace}
59  
60 +
61   \begin{abstract}
62    We have investigated the structural and dynamic properties of the
63 <  basal and prismatic facets of an ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ / water
64 <  interface when the solid phase is being drawn through the liquid
63 >  basal and prismatic facets of the ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ / water
64 >  interface when the solid phase is drawn through the liquid
65    (i.e. sheared relative to the fluid phase). To impose the shear, we
66    utilized a velocity-shearing and scaling (VSS) approach to reverse
67    non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (RNEMD).  This method can create
68    simultaneous temperature and velocity gradients and allow the
69    measurement of transport properties at interfaces.  The interfacial
70 <  width was found to be independent of relative velocity of the ice
71 <  and liquid layers over a wide range of shear rates.  Decays of
72 <  molecular orientational time correlation functions for gave very
73 <  similar estimates for the width of the interfaces, although the
74 <  short- and longer-time decay components of the orientational
75 <  correlation functions behave differently closer to the interface.
76 <  Although both facets of ice are in ``stick'' boundary conditions in
77 <  liquid water, the solid-liquid friction coefficient was found to be
78 <  different for the basal and prismatic facets of ice.
70 >  width was found to be independent of the relative velocity of the
71 >  ice and liquid layers over a wide range of shear rates.  Decays of
72 >  molecular orientational time correlation functions gave similar
73 >  estimates for the width of the interfaces, although the short- and
74 >  longer-time decay components behave differently closer to the
75 >  interface.  Although both facets of ice are in ``stick'' boundary
76 >  conditions in liquid water, the solid-liquid friction coefficients
77 >  were found to be significantly different for the basal and prismatic
78 >  facets of ice.
79   \end{abstract}
80  
81   \newpage
# Line 67 | Line 101 | interface for the SPC, SPC/E, CF1, and TIP4P models fo
101   of quiescent ice/water interfaces utilizing both theory and
102   experiment.  Haymet \emph{et al.} have done extensive work on ice I$_\mathrm{h}$,
103   including characterizing and determining the width of the ice/water
104 < interface for the SPC, SPC/E, CF1, and TIP4P models for
105 < water.\cite{Karim87,Karim88,Karim90,Hayward01,Bryk02,Hayward02,Gay02}
104 > interface for the SPC,\cite{Karim90} SPC/E,\cite{Gay02,Bryk02} CF1,\cite{Hayward01,Hayward02} and TIP4P~\cite{Karim88} models for
105 > water.
106   More recently, Haymet \emph{et al.} have investigated the effects
107   cations and anions have on crystal
108 < nucleation\cite{Bryk04,Smith05,Wilson08,Wilson10}. Nada \emph{et al.}
108 > nucleation.\cite{Bryk04,Smith05,Wilson08,Wilson10} Nada \emph{et al.}
109   have also studied ice/water
110   interfaces,\cite{Nada95,Nada00,Nada03,Nada12} and have found that the
111   differential growth rates of the facets of ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ are due to the the
112 < reordering of the hydrogen bonding network\cite{Nada05}.
112 > reordering of the hydrogen bonding network.\cite{Nada05}
113  
114   The movement of liquid water over the facets of ice has been less
115   thoroughly studied than the quiescent surfaces. This process is
# Line 109 | Line 143 | The structure of ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ is very well under
143  
144   \subsection{Stable ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ / water interfaces under shear}
145  
146 < The structure of ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ is very well understood; it
146 > The structure of ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ is well understood; it
147   crystallizes in a hexagonal space group P$6_3/mmc$, and the hexagonal
148   crystals of ice have two faces that are commonly exposed, the basal
149   face $\{0~0~0~1\}$, which forms the top and bottom of each hexagonal
150   plate, and the prismatic $\{1~0~\bar{1}~0\}$ face which forms the
151   sides of the plate. Other less-common, but still important, faces of
152   ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ are the secondary prism, $\{1~1~\bar{2}~0\}$, and
153 < the prismatic, $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$, faces.  Ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ is
154 < normally proton disordered in bulk crystals, although the surfaces
155 < probably have a preference for proton ordering along strips of
156 < dangling H-atoms and Oxygen lone pairs.\cite{Buch:2008fk}
153 > pyramidal, $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$, faces.  Ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ is normally
154 > proton disordered in bulk crystals, although the surfaces probably
155 > have a preference for proton ordering along strips of dangling H-atoms
156 > and Oxygen lone pairs.\cite{Buch:2008fk}
157  
158 < For small simulated ice interfaces, it is useful to have a
159 < proton-ordered, but zero-dipole crystal that exposes these strips of
126 < dangling H-atoms and lone pairs.  When placing another material in
127 < contact with one of the ice crystalline planes, it is useful to have
128 < an orthorhombic (rectangular) box.  A recent paper by Hirsch and
129 < Ojam\"{a}e describes how to create proton-ordered bulk ice
130 < I$_\mathrm{h}$ in alternative orthorhombic cells.\cite{Hirsch04}
131 <
132 < We are using Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e's structure 6 which is an
133 < orthorhombic cell ($P2_12_12_1$) that produces a proton-ordered
134 < version of ice I$_\mathrm{h}$.  Table \ref{tab:equiv} contains a mapping between
135 < the Miller indices in the P$6_3/mmc$ crystal system and those in the
136 < Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e $P2_12_12_1$ system.
137 <
138 < \begin{wraptable}{r}{3.5in}
158 > \begin{table}[h]
159 > \centering
160    \caption{Mapping between the Miller indices of four facets of ice in
161      the $P6_3/mmc$ crystal system to the orthorhombic $P2_12_12_1$
162 <    system in reference \protect\cite{Hirsch04}}
162 >    system in reference \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\citep{Hirsch04}.}
163   \label{tab:equiv}
164   \begin{tabular}{|ccc|} \hline
165   & hexagonal & orthorhombic \\
# Line 147 | Line 168 | pryamidal & $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$ & $\{2~0~1\}$ \\ \hlin
168   basal & $\{0~0~0~1\}$ & $\{0~0~1\}$ \\
169   prism & $\{1~0~\bar{1}~0\}$ & $\{1~0~0\}$ \\
170   secondary prism & $\{1~1~\bar{2}~0\}$ & $\{1~3~0\}$ \\
171 < pryamidal & $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$ & $\{2~0~1\}$ \\ \hline
171 > pyramidal & $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$ & $\{2~0~1\}$ \\ \hline
172   \end{tabular}
173 < \end{wraptable}
173 > \end{table}
174 > For small simulated ice interfaces, it is useful to work with
175 > proton-ordered, but zero-dipole crystal that exposes these strips of
176 > dangling H-atoms and lone pairs.  When placing another material in
177 > contact with one of the ice crystalline planes, it is also quite
178 > useful to have an orthorhombic (rectangular) box. Recent work by
179 > Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e describes a number of alternative crystal
180 > systems for proton-ordered bulk ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ using orthorhombic
181 > cells.\cite{Hirsch04}
182  
183 + In this work, we are using Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e's structure 6 which
184 + is an orthorhombic cell ($P2_12_12_1$) that produces a proton-ordered
185 + version of ice I$_\mathrm{h}$.  Table \ref{tab:equiv} contains a
186 + mapping between the Miller indices of common ice facets in the
187 + P$6_3/mmc$ crystal system and those in the Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e
188 + $P2_12_12_1$ system.
189 +
190   Structure 6 from the Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e paper has lattice
191 < parameters $a = 4.49225$, $b = 7.78080$, $c = 7.33581$ and two water
192 < molecules whose atoms reside at fractional coordinates given in table
193 < \ref{tab:p212121}.  To construct the basal and prismatic interfaces,
194 < these crystallographic coordinates were used to construct an
195 < orthorhombic unit cell which was then replicated in all three
191 > parameters $a = 4.49225$ \AA\ , $b = 7.78080$ \AA\ , $c = 7.33581$ \AA\
192 > and two water molecules whose atoms reside at fractional coordinates
193 > given in table \ref{tab:p212121}. To construct the basal and prismatic
194 > interfaces, these crystallographic coordinates were used to construct
195 > an orthorhombic unit cell which was then replicated in all three
196   dimensions yielding a proton-ordered block of ice I$_{h}$. To expose
197   the desired face, the orthorhombic representation was then cut along
198   the ($001$) or ($100$) planes for the basal and prismatic faces
199 < respectively.  The resulting block was rotated so that the exposed
200 < faces were aligned with the $z$-dimension normal to the exposed face.
201 < The block was then cut along two perpendicular directions in a way
202 < that allowed for perfect periodic replication in the $x$ and $y$ axes,
199 > respectively. The resulting block was rotated so that the exposed
200 > faces were aligned with the $z$-axis normal to the exposed face. The
201 > block was then cut along two perpendicular directions in a way that
202 > allowed for perfect periodic replication in the $x$ and $y$ axes,
203   creating a slab with either the basal or prismatic faces exposed along
204 < the $z$ axis.  The slab was then replicated in the $x$ and $y$
204 > the $z$ axis. The slab was then replicated in the $x$ and $y$
205   dimensions until a desired sample size was obtained.
206  
207 < \begin{wraptable}{r}{3.25in}
207 > \begin{table}[h]
208 > \centering
209    \caption{Fractional coordinates for water in the orthorhombic
210 <    $P2_12_12_1$ system for ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ in reference
174 <    \protect\cite{Hirsch04}}
210 >    $P2_12_12_1$ system for ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ in reference \bibpunct{}{}{,}{n}{}{,} \protect\citep{Hirsch04}.}
211   \label{tab:p212121}
212   \begin{tabular}{|cccc|}  \hline
213   atom type & x & y & z \\ \hline
214 < O & 0.75 & 0.1667 & 0.4375 \\
214 > O & 0.7500 & 0.1667 & 0.4375 \\
215   H & 0.5735 & 0.2202 & 0.4836 \\
216   H & 0.7420 & 0.0517 & 0.4836 \\
217 < O & 0.25 & 0.6667 & 0.4375 \\
217 > O & 0.2500 & 0.6667 & 0.4375 \\
218   H & 0.2580 & 0.6693 & 0.3071 \\
219   H & 0.4265 & 0.7255 & 0.4756 \\ \hline
220   \end{tabular}
221 < \end{wraptable}
221 > \end{table}
222  
223 < Although experimental solid/liquid coexistant temperature under normal
224 < pressure are close to 273K, Haymet \emph{et al.} have done extensive
225 < work on characterizing the ice/water
226 < interface.\cite{Karim88,Karim90,Hayward01,Bryk02,Hayward02} They have
227 < found that for the SPC/E water model,\cite{Berendsen87} which is also
228 < used in this study, the ice/water interface is most stable at
229 < 225$\pm$5K.\cite{Bryk02} Therefore, we created our ice / water
230 < interfaces, utilizing a box of liquid water that had the same
231 < dimensions in $x$ and $y$ was equilibrated at 225 K and 1 atm of
232 < pressure in the NPAT ensemble (with the $z$ axis allowed to fluctuate
233 < to equilibrate to the correct pressure).  The liquid and solid systems
234 < were combined by carving out any water molecule from the liquid
235 < simulation cell that was within 3 \AA\ of any atom in the ice slab.
223 > Our ice / water interfaces were created using a box of liquid water
224 > that had the same dimensions (in $x$ and $y$) as the ice block.
225 > Although the experimental solid/liquid coexistence temperature under
226 > atmospheric pressure is close to 273~K, Haymet \emph{et al.} have done
227 > extensive work on characterizing the ice/water interface, and find
228 > that the coexistence temperature for simulated water is often quite a
229 > bit different.\cite{Karim88,Karim90,Hayward01,Bryk02,Hayward02} They
230 > have found that for the SPC/E water model,\cite{Berendsen87} which is
231 > also used in this study, the ice/water interface is most stable at
232 > 225~$\pm$5~K.\cite{Bryk02} This liquid box was therefore equilibrated at
233 > 225~K and 1~atm of pressure in the NPAT ensemble (with the $z$ axis
234 > allowed to fluctuate to equilibrate to the correct pressure).  The
235 > liquid and solid systems were combined by carving out any water
236 > molecule from the liquid simulation cell that was within 3~\AA\ of any
237 > atom in the ice slab. The resulting basal system was 24 \AA\ x 36 \AA\ x 99 \AA\ with 900 SPC/E molecules in the ice slab and 1846 SPC/E molecules in the liquid phase. Similarly, the prismatic system was constructed as 36 \AA\ x 36 \AA\ x 86 \AA\ with 1000 SPC/E molecules in the ice slab and 2684 SPC/E molecules in the liquid phase.
238  
239   Molecular translation and orientational restraints were applied in the
240   early stages of equilibration to prevent melting of the ice slab.
# Line 208 | Line 246 | it is necessary to apply a weak thermal gradient along
246   As a solid is dragged through a liquid, there is frictional heating
247   that will act to melt the interface.  To study the behavior of the
248   interface under a shear stress without causing the interface to melt,
249 < it is necessary to apply a weak thermal gradient along with the
250 < momentum gradient.  This can be accomplished using he velocity
249 > it is necessary to apply a weak thermal gradient in combination with
250 > the momentum gradient.  This can be accomplished using the velocity
251   shearing and scaling (VSS) variant of reverse non-equilibrium
252   molecular dynamics (RNEMD), which utilizes a series of simultaneous
253   velocity exchanges between two regions within the simulation
254   cell.\cite{Kuang12} One of these regions is centered within the ice
255 < slab, while the other is centrally located in the liquid phase
255 > slab, while the other is centrally located in the liquid
256   region. VSS-RNEMD provides a set of conservation constraints for
257 < simultaneously creating either a momentum flux or a thermal flux (or
258 < both) between the two slabs.  Satisfying the constraint equations
259 < ensures that the new configurations are sampled from the same NVE
260 < ensemble as before the VSS move.
257 > creating either a momentum flux or a thermal flux (or both
258 > simultaneously) between the two slabs.  Satisfying the constraint
259 > equations ensures that the new configurations are sampled from the
260 > same NVE ensemble as before the VSS move.
261  
262   The VSS moves are applied periodically to scale and shift the particle
263   velocities ($\mathbf{v}_i$ and $\mathbf{v}_j$) in two slabs ($H$ and
# Line 284 | Line 322 | temperatures (90~K) with a single 1 ns simulation.\cit
322   minimal, as is thermal anisotropy.  This ability to generate
323   simultaneous thermal and shear fluxes has been previously utilized to
324   map out the shear viscosity of SPC/E water over a wide range of
325 < temperatures (90~K) with a single 1 ns simulation.\cite{Kuang12}
325 > temperatures (90~K) with a single 1~ns simulation.\cite{Kuang12}
326  
327   For this work, we are using the VSS-RNEMD method primarily to generate
328   a shear between the ice slab and the liquid phase, while using a weak
329 < thermal gradient to maintaining the interface at the 225K target
330 < value. This will insure minimal melting of the bulk ice phase and
331 < allows us to control the exact temperature of the interface.
329 > thermal gradient to maintain the interface at the 225~K target
330 > value. This ensures minimal melting of the bulk ice phase and allows
331 > us to control the exact temperature of the interface.
332  
333   \subsection{Computational Details}
334   All simulations were performed using OpenMD,\cite{OOPSE,openmd} with a
# Line 298 | Line 336 | which were attempted every 50 fs.
336   dimensions.  Electrostatics were handled using the damped-shifted
337   force real-space electrostatic kernel.\cite{Ewald} The systems were
338   divided into 100 bins along the $z$-axis for the VSS-RNEMD moves,
339 < which were attempted every 50 fs.
339 > which were attempted every 50~fs.
340  
341   The interfaces were equilibrated for a total of 10 ns at equilibrium
342   conditions before being exposed to either a shear or thermal gradient.
343   This consisted of 5 ns under a constant temperature (NVT) integrator
344   set to 225K followed by 5 ns under a microcanonical integrator.  Weak
345   thermal gradients were allowed to develop using the VSS-RNEMD (NVE)
346 < integrator using a a small thermal flux ($-2.0\times 10^{-6}$
346 > integrator using a small thermal flux ($-2.0\times 10^{-6}$
347   kcal/mol/\AA$^2$/fs) for a duration of 5 ns to allow the gradient to
348 < stabilize.  The resulting temperature gradient was less than 5K over
349 < the entire 1 nm box length, which was sufficient to keep the
348 > stabilize.  The resulting temperature gradient was $\approx$ 10K over
349 > the entire 100 \AA\  box length, which was sufficient to keep the
350   temperature at the interface within $\pm 1$ K of the 225K target.
351  
352   Velocity gradients were then imposed using the VSS-RNEMD (NVE)
353   integrator with a range of momentum fluxes.  These gradients were
354 < allowed to stabilize for 1 ns before data collection began. Once
355 < established, four successive 0.5 ns runs were performed for each shear
354 > allowed to stabilize for 1~ns before data collection began. Once
355 > established, four successive 0.5~ns runs were performed for each shear
356   rate.  During these simulations, snapshots of the system were taken
357 < every 1 ps, and statistics on the structure and dynamics in each bin
357 > every 1~ps, and statistics on the structure and dynamics in each bin
358   were accumulated throughout the simulations.
359  
360   \section{Results and discussion}
361  
362 < \subsection{Measuring the Width of the Interface}
363 < Any order parameter or correlation function that varies across the
364 < interface from a bulk liquid to a solid can be used as a measure of
365 < the width of the interface.  However, because VSS-RNEMD imposes a
366 < lateral flow, parameters that depend on translational motion of the
367 < molecules (e.g. the diffusion constant) may be artifically skewed by
368 < the RNEMD moves.  A structural parameter like a radial distribution
369 < function is not influenced by the RNEMD perturbations to the same
370 < degree. Here, we have used the local tetraherdal order parameter as
371 < described by Kumar\cite{Kumar09} and Errington\cite{Errington01} as a
362 > \subsection{Interfacial width}
363 > Any order parameter or time correlation function that changes as one
364 > crosses an interface from a bulk liquid to a solid can be used to
365 > measure the width of the interface.  In previous work on the ice/water
366 > interface, Haymet {\it et al.}\cite{Bryk02} have utilized structural
367 > features (including the density) as well as dynamic properties
368 > (including the diffusion constant) to estimate the width of the
369 > interfaces for a number of facets of the ice crystals.  Because
370 > VSS-RNEMD imposes a lateral flow, parameters that depend on
371 > translational motion of the molecules (e.g. diffusion) may be
372 > artificially skewed by the RNEMD moves.  A structural parameter is not
373 > influenced by the RNEMD perturbations to the same degree. Here, we
374 > have used the local tetrahedral order parameter as described by
375 > Kumar\cite{Kumar09} and Errington\cite{Errington01} as our principal
376   measure of the interfacial width.
377  
378   The local tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z)$, is given by
379   \begin{equation}
380 < q(z) \equiv \int_0^L \sum_{k=1}^{N} \Bigg(1 -\frac{3}{8}\sum_{i=1}^{3}
381 < \sum_{j=i+1}^{4} \bigg[\cos\psi_{ikj}+\frac{1}{3}\bigg]^2\Bigg)
382 < \delta(z_{k}-z)\mathrm{d}z
380 > q(z) = \int_0^L \sum_{k=1}^{N} \Bigg(1 -\frac{3}{8}\sum_{i=1}^{3}
381 > \sum_{j=i+1}^{4} \bigg(\cos\psi_{ikj}+\frac{1}{3}\bigg)^2\Bigg)
382 > \delta(z_{k}-z)\mathrm{d}z \Bigg/ N_z
383   \label{eq:qz}
384   \end{equation}
385   where $\psi_{ikj}$ is the angle formed between the oxygen site on
386 < molecule $k$, and the oxygen sites on its two closest neighbors,
387 < molecules $i$ and $j$.  The local tetrahedral order parameter function
388 < has a range of (0,1), where the larger the value $q$ has the more
389 < tetrahedral the ordering of the local environment is.  A $q$ value of
390 < one describes a perfectly tetrahedral environment relative to it and
391 < its four nearest neighbors, and the parameter's value decreases as the
392 < local ordering becomes less tetrahedral.   Equation \ref{eq:qz}
393 < describes a $z$-binned tetrahedral order parameter in which the $z$
394 < coordinate of the central molecule is used to give a spatial
395 < description of the local orientational ordering.
386 > central molecule $k$, and the oxygen sites on two of the four closest
387 > molecules, $i$ and $j$.  Molecules $i$ and $j$ are further restricted
388 > to lie within the first solvation shell of molecule $k$.  $N_z = \int
389 > \delta(z_k - z) \mathrm{d}z$ is a normalization factor to account for
390 > the varying population of molecules within each finite-width bin.  The
391 > local tetrahedral order parameter has a range of $(0,1)$, where the
392 > larger values of $q$ indicate a larger degree of tetrahedral ordering
393 > of the local environment.  In perfect ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ structures,
394 > the parameter can approach 1 at low temperatures, while in liquid
395 > water, the ordering is significantly less tetrahedral, and values of
396 > $q(z) \approx 0.75$ are more common.
397  
398 < The system was divided into 100 bins along the $z$-dimension, and a
399 < cutoff radius for the neighboring molecules was set to 3.41 \AA\ .
400 < The $q_{z}$ values for each snapshot were then averaged to give a
401 < tetrahedrality profile of the system about the $z$-dimension. The
402 < profile was then fit with a hyperbolic tangent function given by
403 <
398 > To estimate the interfacial width, the system was divided into 100
399 > bins along the $z$-dimension, and a cutoff radius for the first
400 > solvation shell was set to 3.41~\AA\ .  The $q_{z}$ function was
401 > time-averaged to give yield a tetrahedrality profile of the
402 > system. The profile was then fit to a hyperbolic tangent that smoothly
403 > links the liquid and solid states,
404   \begin{equation}\label{tet_fit}
405 < q_{z} \approx q_{liq}+\frac{q_{ice}-q_{liq}}{2}\Bigg[\tanh\bigg(\frac{z-I_{L,m}}{w}\bigg)-\tanh\bigg(\frac{z-I_{R,m}}{w}\bigg)\Bigg]+\beta|(z-z_{mid})|
405 > q(z) \approx
406 > q_{liq}+\frac{q_{ice}-q_{liq}}{2}\left[\tanh\left(\frac{z-l}{w}\right)-\tanh\left(\frac{z-r}{w}\right)\right]+\beta\left|z-
407 > \frac{r+l}{2}\right|.
408   \end{equation}
409 + Here $q_{liq}$ and $q_{ice}$ are the local tetrahedral order parameter
410 + for the bulk liquid and ice domains, respectively, $w$ is the width of
411 + the interface.  $l$ and $r$ are the midpoints of the left and right
412 + interfaces, respectively.  The last term in eq. \eqref{tet_fit}
413 + accounts for the influence that the weak thermal gradient has on the
414 + tetrahedrality profile in the liquid region.  To estimate the
415 + 10\%-90\% widths commonly used in previous studies,\cite{Bryk02} it is
416 + a simple matter to scale the widths obtained from the hyperbolic
417 + tangent fits to obtain $w_{10-90} = 2.1971 \times w$.\cite{Bryk02}
418  
419 < where $q_{liq}$ and $q_{ice}$ are fitting parameters for the local tetrahedral order parameter for the liquid and ice, $w$ is the width of the interface, and $I_{L,m}$ and $I_{R,m}$ are the midpoints of the left and right interface. The last term in \eqref{tet_fit} accounts for the influence  the thermal gradient has on the tetrahedrality profile in the liquid region; where $\beta$ is a fitting parameter and $z_{mid}$ is the midpoint of the $z$-dimension of the simulation box.
420 <
421 < In Figures \ref{fig:bComic} and \ref{fig:pComic} we see the $z$-dimensional profiles for several components of the basal and prismatic systems. In panel (a) of the figures we see the tetrahedrality profile of the systems (black circles). In the liquid region of the system, the local tetrahedral order parameter is approximately 0.75 while in the solid region the parameter is approximately 0.94, indicating a more tetrahedral structure of the water molecules. The hyperbolic tangent function used to fit the tetrahedrality profiles is in red and the verticle dotted lines denote the midpoint of the interfaces. The weak thermal gradient applied to the systems in order to keep the interface at a stable temperature, 225$\pm$5K, can be seen in panel (b).  Lastly, the velocity gradient across the systems can be seen in panel (c). From panel (c), we can see liquid phase water molecules 10 \AA\ to 15 \AA\ from the interfaces are being dragged along with the ice block, indicating that the shearing of ice water is in the stick boundary condition.  
419 > In Figures \ref{fig:bComic} and \ref{fig:pComic} we see the
420 > $z$-coordinate profiles for tetrahedrality, temperature, and the
421 > $x$-component of the velocity for the basal and prismatic interfaces.
422 > The lower panels show the $q(z)$ (black circles) along with the
423 > hyperbolic tangent fits (red lines). In the liquid region, the local
424 > tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z) \approx 0.75$ while in the
425 > crystalline region, $q(z) \approx 0.94$, indicating a more tetrahedral
426 > environment.  The vertical dotted lines denote the midpoint of the
427 > interfaces ($r$ and $l$ in eq. \eqref{tet_fit}). The weak thermal
428 > gradient applied to the systems in order to keep the interface at
429 > 225~$\pm$~5K, can be seen in middle panels.  The transverse velocity
430 > profile is shown in the upper panels.  It is clear from the upper
431 > panels that water molecules in close proximity to the surface (i.e.
432 > within 10~\AA\ to 15~\AA~of the interfaces) have transverse
433 > velocities quite close to the velocities within the ice block.  There
434 > is no velocity discontinuity at the interface, which indicates that
435 > the shearing of ice/water interfaces occurs in the ``stick'' or
436 > no-slip boundary conditions.
437  
438   \begin{figure}
439   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{bComicStrip}
440 < \caption{\label{fig:bComic} The basal system: (a) The local tetrahedral order parameter,$q$, (black circles) fit by a hyperbolic tangent (red line), (b) the thermal gradient imposed on the system to maintain a stable interfacial temperature, and (c) the velocity gradient imposed on the system. The verticle dotted lines indicate the midpoint of the interfaces.}
440 > \caption{\label{fig:bComic} The basal interfaces.  Lower panel: the
441 >  local tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z)$, (black circles) and the
442 >  hyperbolic tangent fit (red line).  Middle panel: the imposed
443 >  thermal gradient required to maintain a fixed interfacial
444 >  temperature.  Upper panel: the transverse velocity gradient that
445 >  develops in response to an imposed momentum flux.  The vertical
446 >  dotted lines indicate the locations of the midpoints of the two
447 >  interfaces.}
448   \end{figure}
449  
450   \begin{figure}
451   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{pComicStrip}
452 < \caption{\label{fig:pComic} The prismatic system: (a) The local tetrahedral order parameter,$q$, (black circles) fit by a hyperbolic tangent (red line), (b) the thermal gradient imposed on the system to maintain a stable interfacial temperature, and (c) the velocity gradient imposed on the system.The verticle dotted lines indicate the midpoint of the interfaces.}
452 > \caption{\label{fig:pComic} The prismatic interfaces.  Panel
453 >  descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:bComic}}
454   \end{figure}
455  
456 < From the tetrahedrality fits, we found the interfacial width for the basal and prismatic systems to be 3.2$\pm$0.4 \AA\ and 3.6$\pm$0.2 \AA\ with no applied momentum flux. Over the range of shear rates investigated, 0.6$\pm$0.3 ms\textsuperscript{-1} to 5.3$\pm$0.5 ms\textsuperscript{-1} for the basal system and 0.9$\pm$0.2 ms\textsuperscript{-1} to 4.5$\pm$0.1 ms\textsuperscript{-1} for the prismatic, there was no appreciable change in the interface width found. The calculated values for the interfacial width over all shear rates investigated contained the control values within their error bars.
456 > From the fits using eq. \eqref{tet_fit}, we find the interfacial
457 > width for the basal and prismatic systems to be 3.2~$\pm$~0.4~\AA\ and
458 > 3.6~$\pm$~0.2~\AA\ , respectively, with no applied momentum flux. Over
459 > the range of shear rates investigated, $0.6 \pm 0.3 \mathrm{ms}^{-1}
460 > \rightarrow 5.3 \pm 0.5 \mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the basal system and
461 > $0.9 \pm 0.2 \mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow 4.5 \pm 0.1
462 > \mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the prismatic, we found no appreciable change in
463 > the interface width. The fit values for the interfacial width ($w$)
464 > over all shear rates contained the values reported above within their
465 > error bars.
466  
467 < \subsubsection{Orientational Time Correlation Function}
468 < The orientational time correlation function (OTCF) gives insight of the local environment of molecules. The rate at which the function decays corresponds to how hindered the motions of a molecule are. The more hindered a molecules motion is the slower the function will decay, and the function decays more rapidly for molecules with less constrained motions.
467 > \subsubsection{Orientational Dynamics}
468 > The orientational time correlation function,
469   \begin{equation}\label{C(t)1}
470 < C_{2}(t)=\langle P_{2}(\mathbf{v}_{i}(t)\mathbf{v}_{i}(t=0))\rangle
470 >  C_{2}(t)=\langle P_{2}(\mathbf{u}(0) \cdot \mathbf{u}(t)) \rangle,
471   \end{equation}
472 < In eq. \eqref{C(t)1}, $P_{2}$ is the Legendre polynomial of the second order and $\mathbf{v}_{i}$ is the bisecting unit vector of the $i$th water molecule in the lab frame.
472 > gives insight into the local dynamic environment around the water
473 > molecules.  The rate at which the function decays provides information
474 > about hindered motions and the timescales for relaxation.  In
475 > eq. \eqref{C(t)1}, $P_{2}$ is the second-order Legendre polynomial,
476 > the vector $\mathbf{u}$ is often taken as HOH bisector, although
477 > slightly different behavior can be observed when $\mathbf{u}$ is the
478 > vector along one of the OH bonds.  The angle brackets denote an
479 > ensemble average over all water molecules in a given spatial region.
480  
481 < Here, we are evaluating this function across the $z$-dimension of the system as another measure of the change in the local environment and behavior of water molecules from the liquid region to the slushy interfacial region. After each of the 0.5 ns simulations, the systems were run for an additional 200 ps where the positions of every molecule in the system were recorded every 0.1 ps. The systems were then divided into 30 bins and the OTCF was evaluated for each bin.
481 > To investigate the dynamic behavior of water at the ice interfaces, we
482 > have computed $C_{2}(z,t)$ for molecules that are present within a
483 > particular slab along the $z$- axis at the initial time.  The change
484 > in the decay behavior as a function of the $z$ coordinate is another
485 > measure of the change of how the local environment changes across the
486 > ice/water interface.  To compute these correlation functions, each of
487 > the 0.5 ns simulations was followed by a shorter 200 ps microcanonical
488 > (NVE) simulation in which the positions and orientations of every
489 > molecule in the system were recorded every 0.1 ps. The systems were
490 > then divided into 30 bins along the $z$-axis and $C_2(t)$ was
491 > evaluated for each bin.
492  
493 < It has been shown that the OTCF for water can be fit by a triexponential decay\cite{Furse08}, where the three components of the decay correspond to a fast (<200 fs) reorientational piece driven by the restoring forces of existing hydrogen bonds, a middle (on the order of several ps) piece describing the large angle jumps that occur during the breaking and formation of new hydrogen bonds\cite{Laage08,Laage11}, and a slow (on the order of tens of ps) contribution describing the translational motion of the molecules. The OTCF data for each bin were truncated at 100 ps, and fit to the triexponential decay
493 > In simulations of water at biological interfaces, Furse {\em et al.}
494 > fit $C_2(t)$ functions for water with triexponential
495 > functions,\cite{Furse08} where the three components of the decay
496 > correspond to a fast ($<$200 fs) reorientational piece driven by the
497 > restoring forces of existing hydrogen bonds, a middle (on the order of
498 > several ps) piece describing the large angle jumps that occur during
499 > the breaking and formation of new hydrogen bonds,and a slow (on the
500 > order of tens of ps) contribution describing the translational motion
501 > of the molecules.  The model for orientational decay presented
502 > recently by Laage and Hynes {\em et al.}\cite{Laage08,Laage11} also
503 > includes three similar decay constants, although two of the time
504 > constants are linked, and the resulting decay curve has two parameters
505 > governing the dynamics of decay.
506 >
507 > In our ice/water interfaces, we are at substantially lower
508 > temperatures, and the water molecules are further perturbed by the
509 > presence of the ice phase nearby.  We have obtained the most
510 > reasonable fits using triexponential functions with three distinct
511 > time domains, as well as a constant piece to account for the water
512 > stuck in the ice phase that does not experience any long-time
513 > orientational decay,
514   \begin{equation}
515 < C_{2}(t) \approx a_{1}e^{-t/\tau_{short}}+a_{2}e^{-t/\tau_{middle}}+a_{3}e^{-t/\tau_{long}}+a_{4}
515 > C_{2}(t) \approx a e^{-t/\tau_\mathrm{short}} + b e^{-t/\tau_\mathrm{middle}} + c
516 > e^{-t/\tau_\mathrm{long}} + (1-a-b-c)
517   \end{equation}
518 < where $a_{1}+a_{2}+a_{3}+a_{4}=1$. An average value and standard deviation for each $\tau$ was obtained for each bin from the four runs. Lastly, the means and standard deviations were averaged about the center of the system.
518 > Average values for the three decay constants (and error estimates)
519 > were obtained for each bin. In figures \ref{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip}
520 > and \ref{fig:prismatic_Tau_comic_strip}, the three orientational decay
521 > times are shown as a function of distance from the center of the ice
522 > slab.
523  
524   \begin{figure}
525   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{basal_Tau_comic_strip}
526 < \caption{\label{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip} The orientational time correlation function for the basal system fit by the triexponential decay $a_{1}e^{-t/\tau_{short}}+a_{2}e^{-t/\tau_{middle}}+a_{3}e^{-t/\tau_{long}}+a_{4}$ where $a_{1}+a_{2}+a_{3}+a_{4}=1$. The verticle dotted line indicates the average midpoint of the interface as determined by the tetrahedrality fit. In (b) and (c) $\tau_{middle}$ and $\tau_{long}$ have a consistent value of about 5.5 ps and 50 ps in the liquid region, and increase in value approaching the interface. $\tau_{middle}$ corresponds to the breaking and making of hydrogen bonds as explained by extended jump model proposed by Laage and Hynes\cite{Laage08,Laage11} and $\tau_{long}$ relates to the translational motion of the molecules. In (a), we see that $\tau_{short}$ has a value of about 71 fs in the liquid region, and decreases in value approaching the interface. This component of the decay corresponds to the reorientational forces of existing hydrogen bonds on the inertial rotational of the molecules. Thus $\tau_{short}$ decreases approaching the interface due to the hindered range of motion of the molecules. }
526 > \caption{\label{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip} The three decay constants
527 >  of the orientational time correlation function, $C_2(t)$, for water
528 >  as a function of distance from the center of the ice slab.  The
529 >  dashed line indicates the location of the basal face (as determined
530 >  from the tetrahedrality order parameter).  The moderate and long
531 >  time contributions slow down close to the interface which would be
532 >  expected under reorganizations that involve large motions of the
533 >  molecules (e.g. frame-reorientations and jumps).  The observed
534 >  speed-up in the short time contribution is surprising, but appears
535 >  to reflect the restricted motion of librations closer to the
536 >  interface.}
537   \end{figure}
538  
539   \begin{figure}
540   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{prismatic_Tau_comic_strip}
541 < \caption{\label{fig:prismatic_Tau_comic_strip} The orientational time correlation function for the prismatic system fit by the triexponential decay $a_{1}e^{-t/\tau_{short}}+a_{2}e^{-t/\tau_{middle}}+a_{3}e^{-t/\tau_{long}}+a_{4}$ where $a_{1}+a_{2}+a_{3}+a_{4}=1$. The verticle dotted line indicates the average midpoint of the interface as determined by the tetrahedrality fit. In (b) and (c) $\tau_{middle}$ and $\tau_{long}$ have a consistent value of about 3.5 ps and 30 ps in the liquid region, and increase in value approaching the interface. $\tau_{middle}$ corresponds to the breaking and making of hydrogen bonds as explained by extended jump model proposed by Laage and Hynes\cite{Laage08,Laage11} and $\tau_{long}$ relates to the translational motion of the molecules. In (a), we see that $\tau_{short}$ has a value of about 73 fs in the liquid region, and decreases in value approaching the interface. This component of the decay corresponds to the reorientational forces of existing hydrogen bonds on the inertial rotational of the molecules. Thus $\tau_{short}$ decreases approaching the interface due to the hindered range of motion of the molecules.}
541 > \caption{\label{fig:prismatic_Tau_comic_strip}
542 > Decay constants for $C_2(t)$ at the prismatic interface.  Panel
543 >  descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip}.}
544   \end{figure}
545  
546 < Figures \ref{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip} and \ref{fig:prismatic_Tau_comic_strip} plot the decomposition of the OTCF at varying displacements from the center of the ice for the basal and prismatic systems. We see in (a) $\tau_{short}$, (b) $\tau_{middle}$, and (c) $\tau_{long}$ for the control system (no applied momentum flux)  in black, and a system with a large shear rate in red. The verticle dotted lines at a displacement of about 17 \AA\ and 9 \AA\ denote the midpoints of the interfaces as determined by the hyperbolic tangent fit of the tetrahedrality profile.
546 > Figures \ref{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip} and
547 > \ref{fig:prismatic_Tau_comic_strip} show the three decay constants for
548 > the orientational time correlation function for water at varying
549 > displacements from the center of the ice slab for both the basal and
550 > prismatic interfaces.  The vertical dotted lines indicate the
551 > locations of the midpoints of the interfaces as determined by the
552 > tetrahedrality fits. In the liquid regions, $\tau_{middle}$ and
553 > $\tau_{long}$ have consistent values around 3-4 ps and 20-40 ps,
554 > respectively, and increase in value approaching the interface.
555 > According to the jump model of Laage and Hynes {\em et
556 >  al.},\cite{Laage08,Laage11} $\tau_{middle}$ corresponds to the
557 > breaking and making of hydrogen bonds and $\tau_{long}$ is explained
558 > with translational motion of the molecules (i.e. frame reorientation).
559 > The shortest of the three decay constants, the librational time
560 > $\tau_\mathrm{short}$ has a value of about 70 fs in the liquid region,
561 > and decreases in value approaching the interface. The observed
562 > speed-up in the short time contribution is surprising, but appears to
563 > reflect the restricted motion of librations closer to the interface.
564  
565 < In panels (a), we see at large displacements from the center of the ice $\tau_{short}$ for the basal system has a value of about 71 fs and 72 fs for the prismatic. Decreasing in displacement from about 26 \AA\ to about 19 \AA\ in the basal system, the value of $\tau_{short}$ decreases to about 63 fs. Likewise, $\tau_{short}$ decreases to about 63 fs from roughly 20 \AA\ to 12 \AA\ . This is due to the increasingly constrained motion of the water molecules as we approach the interface. In panels (b), $\tau_{middle}$ at large displacements from the ice has a value of about 5.5 ps and 3 ps for the basal and prismatic systems. We find $\tau_{middle}$ increases in value as we approach the interface in both cases. This component of the decay corresponds to the rearrangement of the hydrogen bonding network, which takes longer as the molecules motion becomes more constrained. In panels (c), $\tau_{long}$ has a value of about 50 ps for the basal system and roughly 30 ps for the prismatic system at large displacements from the interface. Similar to $\tau_{middle}$, $\tau_{long}$ also increases in value as we approach the interface for both systems. It is also apparent from Figures \ref{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip} and \ref{fig:prismatic_Tau_comic_strip} that shearing the ice water has no effect on the orientational decay time, or on any of its decomposed components.
565 > The control systems (with no applied momentum flux) are shown with
566 > black symbols in figs. \ref{fig:basal_Tau_comic_strip} and
567 > \ref{fig:prismatic_Tau_comic_strip}, while those obtained while a
568 > shear was active are shown in red.
569  
570 < For each system, there is an apparent approximate value for $\tau_{short}$, $\tau_{middle}$, and $\tau_{long}$ at large displacements from the interface. There also appears to be a single displacement, $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$, from the interface at which all three decay times begin to deviate from their bulk liquid values. We found $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$ to be roughly 15 \AA\ and 8 \AA\ respectively. These two results indicate that the dynamics of the water molecules within  $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$ are being significantly perturbed by the ice and/or the interface, even though the structural width of the interface by analysis of the tetrahedrality profile indicates that bulk liquid structure of water is recovered after about 4 \AA\ from the edge of the ice.
570 > Two notable features deserve clarification.  First, there are
571 > nearly-constant liquid-state values for $\tau_{short}$,
572 > $\tau_{middle}$, and $\tau_{long}$ at large displacements from the
573 > interface. Second, there appears to be a single distance, $d_{basal}$
574 > or $d_{prismatic}$, from the interface at which all three decay times
575 > begin to deviate from their bulk liquid values. We find these
576 > distances to be approximately 15~\AA\ and 8~\AA\, respectively,
577 > although significantly finer binning of the $C_2(t)$ data would be
578 > necessary to provide better estimates of a ``dynamic'' interfacial
579 > thickness.
580  
581 < Beaglehole and Wilson have measured the ice/water interface to have a thickness approximately 10 \AA\ for both the basal and prismatic face of ice by ellipticity measurements \cite{Beaglehole93}. Structurally, we have found the basal and prismatic  interfacial width to be 3.2$\pm$0.4 \AA\ and 3.6$\pm$0.2 \AA\ . However, we have shown through decomposition of the OTCF a much larger interfacial region exists in which the dynamics of the water molecules behave differently than those of the bulk liquid.
581 > Beaglehole and Wilson have measured the ice/water interface using
582 > ellipsometry and find a thickness of approximately 10~\AA\ for both
583 > the basal and prismatic faces.\cite{Beaglehole93} Structurally, we
584 > have found the basal and prismatic interfacial width to be
585 > 3.2~$\pm$~0.4~\AA\ and 3.6~$\pm$~0.2~\AA. However, decomposition of
586 > the spatial dependence of the decay times of $C_2(t)$ indicates that a
587 > somewhat thicker interfacial region exists in which the orientational
588 > dynamics of the water molecules begin to resemble the trapped
589 > interfacial water more than the surrounding liquid.
590  
591 + Our results indicate that the dynamics of the water molecules within
592 + $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$ are being significantly perturbed by
593 + the interface, even though the structural width of the interface via
594 + analysis of the tetrahedrality profile indicates that bulk liquid
595 + structure of water is recovered after about 4 \AA\ from the edge of
596 + the ice.
597 +
598   \subsection{Coefficient of Friction of the Interface}
599 < As the ice is sheared through the liquid, there will be a friction between the solid and the liquid. Pit has shown how to calculate the coefficient of friction $\lambda$ for a solid-liquid interface for a Newtonian fluid of viscosity $\eta$ and has a slip length of $\delta$. \cite{Pit99}
599 > As liquid water flows over an ice interface, there is a distance from
600 > the structural interface where bulk-like hydrodynamics are recovered.
601 > Bocquet and Barrat constructed a theory for the hydrodynamic boundary
602 > parameters, which include the slipping length
603 > $\left(\delta_\mathrm{wall}\right)$ of this boundary layer and the
604 > ``hydrodynamic position'' of the boundary
605 > $\left(z_\mathrm{wall}\right)$.\cite{PhysRevLett.70.2726,PhysRevE.49.3079}
606 > This last parameter is the location (relative to a solid surface)
607 > where the bulk-like behavior is recovered.  Work by Mundy {\it et al.}
608 > has helped to combine these parameters into a liquid-solid friction
609 > coefficient, which quantifies the resistance to pulling the solid
610 > interface through a liquid,\cite{Mundy1997305}
611 > \begin{equation}
612 > \lambda_\mathrm{wall} = \frac{\eta}{\delta_\mathrm{wall}}.
613 > \end{equation}
614 > This expression is nearly identical to one provided by Pit {\it et
615 >  al.} for the solid-liquid friction of an interface,\cite{Pit99}
616   \begin{equation}\label{Pit}
617 < \lambda=\eta/\delta
617 >  \lambda=\frac{\eta}{\delta}
618   \end{equation}
619 < From linear response theory, $\eta$ can be obtained from the imposed momentum flux  and the slope of the velocity about the dimension of the imposed flux.\cite{Kuang12}
619 > where $\delta$ is the slip length for the liquid measured at the
620 > location of the interface itself.
621 >
622 > In both of these expressions, $\eta$ is the shear viscosity of the
623 > bulk-like region of the liquid, a quantity which is easily obtained in
624 > VSS-RNEMD simulations by fitting the velocity profile in the region
625 > far from the surface.\cite{Kuang12} Assuming linear response in the
626 > bulk-like region,
627   \begin{equation}\label{Kuang}
628 < j_{z}(p_{x})=-\eta\frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}
628 > j_{z}(p_{x})=-\eta \left(\frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}\right)
629   \end{equation}
630 < Solving eq. \eqref{Kuang} for $\eta$ and substituting the result into eq. \eqref{Pit}, we obtain an alternate expression for the coefficient of friction.
630 > Substituting this result into eq. \eqref{Pit}, we can estimate the
631 > solid-liquid coefficient using the slip length,
632   \begin{equation}
633 < \lambda=-\frac{j_{z}(p_{x})}{\delta \frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}}
633 > \lambda=-\frac{j_{z}(p_{x})} {\left(\frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial
634 >      z}\right) \delta}
635   \end{equation}
636  
637 < For our simulations, we obtain $\delta$ from the difference between the structural edge of the ice block determined by the tetrahedrality profile fit, and the intersection of the linear regression of the $v_{x}$ profiles about the $z$-dimension for the ice and liquid. (See Figure \ref{fig:delta_example}) The coefficient of friction for the basal and the prismatic facets were found to be (0.07$\pm$0.01) amu fs\textsuperscript{-1} and (0.032$\pm$0.007) amu fs\textsuperscript{-1}. It is known that the basal and prismatic faces have different surface structures. The basal face is smoother than the prismatic with small alternating valleys and crests, while the prismatic surface has deep corrugating channels. We believe the reason that the prismatic face's coefficient of friction was found to be smaller than the basal's is due to the direction of the shear. The shear of the ice/water was in the same direction of the corrugating channels, allowing water molecules to pass through the channels during the shear.
637 > For ice / water interfaces, the boundary conditions are markedly
638 > no-slip, so projecting the bulk liquid state velocity profile yields a
639 > negative slip length. This length is the difference between the
640 > structural edge of the ice (determined by the tetrahedrality profile)
641 > and the location where the projected velocity of the bulk liquid
642 > intersects the solid phase velocity (see Figure
643 > \ref{fig:delta_example}). The coefficients of friction for the basal
644 > and the prismatic facets are found to be
645 > 0.07~$\pm$~0.01~amu~fs\textsuperscript{-1} and
646 > 0.032~$\pm$~0.007~amu~fs\textsuperscript{-1}, respectively. These
647 > results may seem surprising as the basal face is smoother than the
648 > prismatic with only small undulations of the oxygen positions, while
649 > the prismatic surface has deep corrugated channels. The applied
650 > momentum flux used in our simulations is parallel to these channels,
651 > however, and this results in a flow of water in the same direction as
652 > the corrugations, allowing water molecules to pass through the
653 > channels during the shear.
654  
655   \begin{figure}
656   \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{delta_example}
657 < \caption{\label{fig:delta_example} A schematic of determining the slip length ($\delta$). The slip length is the difference of the structural starting point of the ice and the point of intersection of the linear regressions of the liquid phase velocity profile (red) and of the solid ice velocity profile (black). The dotted line indicates the location of the ice as determined by the tetrahedrality profile.}
657 > \caption{\label{fig:delta_example} Determining the (negative) slip
658 >  length ($\delta$) for the ice-water interfaces (which have decidedly
659 >  non-slip behavior).  This length is the difference between the
660 >  structural edge of the ice (determined by the tetrahedrality
661 >  profile) and the location where the projected velocity of the bulk
662 >  liquid (dashed red line) intersects the solid phase velocity (solid
663 >  black line).  The dotted line indicates the location of the ice as
664 >  determined by the tetrahedrality profile.}
665   \end{figure}
666  
667  
668   \section{Conclusion}
669 < Here we have simulated the basal and prismatic facets of an SPC/E model of the ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ / water interface. Using VSS-RNEMD, the ice was sheared relative to the liquid while imposed thermal gradients kept the interface at a stable temperature. Caculation of the local tetrahedrality order parameter has shown an apparent independence of the shear rate on the interfacial width, which was found to be 3.2$\pm$0.4 \AA\ and 3.6$\pm$0.2 \AA\ for the basal and prismatic systems. The orientational time correlation function was calculated from varying displacements from the interface. Decomposition by a triexponential decay also showed an apparent independence of the shear rate. The short time decay due to the restoring forces of existing hydrogen bonds decreased at close displacements from the interface, while the middle and long time decays were found to increase. There is also an apparent displacement, $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$, from the interface at which these deviations from bulk liquid values occurs. We found $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$ to be approximately 15 \AA\ and 8 \AA\ . This implies that the dynamics of water molecules which are structurally equivalent to bulk phase molecules are being perturbed by the presence of the ice and/or the interface. The coefficient of friction of each of the facets was also determined. They were found to be (0.07$\pm$0.01) amu fs\textsuperscript{-1} and (0.032$\pm$0.007) amu fs\textsuperscript{-1} for the basal and prismatic facets respectively. We believe the large difference between the two friction coefficients is due to the direction of the shear and the surface structure of the crystal facets.
669 > We have simulated the basal and prismatic facets of an SPC/E model of
670 > the ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ / water interface.  Using VSS-RNEMD, the ice
671 > was sheared relative to the liquid while simultaneously being exposed
672 > to a weak thermal gradient which kept the interface at a stable
673 > temperature.  Calculation of the local tetrahedrality order parameter
674 > has shown an apparent independence of the interfacial width on the
675 > shear rate.  This width was found to be 3.2~$\pm$0.4~\AA\ and
676 > 3.6~$\pm$0.2~\AA\ for the basal and prismatic systems, respectively.
677  
678 < \begin{acknowledgement}
678 > Orientational time correlation functions were calculated at varying
679 > displacements from the interface, and were found to be similarly
680 > independent of the applied momentum flux. The short decay due to the
681 > restoring forces of existing hydrogen bonds decreased close to the
682 > interface, while the longer-time decay constants increased in close
683 > proximity to the interface.  There is also an apparent dynamic
684 > interface width, $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$, at which these
685 > deviations from bulk liquid values begin.  We found $d_{basal}$ and
686 > $d_{prismatic}$ to be approximately 15~\AA\ and 8~\AA\ . This implies
687 > that the dynamics of water molecules which have similar structural
688 > environments to liquid phase molecules are dynamically perturbed by
689 > the presence of the ice interface.
690 >
691 > The coefficient of liquid-solid friction for each of the facets was
692 > also determined. They were found to be
693 > 0.07~$\pm$~0.01~amu~fs\textsuperscript{-1} and
694 > 0.032~$\pm$~0.007~amu~fs\textsuperscript{-1} for the basal and
695 > prismatic facets respectively. We attribute the large difference
696 > between the two friction coefficients to the direction of the shear
697 > and to the surface structure of the crystal facets.
698 >
699 > \section{Acknowledgements}
700    Support for this project was provided by the National Science
701    Foundation under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided
702    by the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of
703    Notre Dame.
444 \end{acknowledgement}
704  
705   \newpage
447 \bibstyle{achemso}
706   \bibliography{iceWater}
707  
708 < \begin{tocentry}
451 < \begin{wrapfigure}{l}{0.5\textwidth}
452 < \begin{center}
453 < \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SystemImage.png}
454 < \end{center}
455 < \end{wrapfigure}
456 < An image of our system.
457 < \end{tocentry}
708 > \end{doublespace}
709  
710 + % \begin{tocentry}
711 + % \begin{wrapfigure}{l}{0.5\textwidth}
712 + % \begin{center}
713 + % \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SystemImage.png}
714 + % \end{center}
715 + % \end{wrapfigure}
716 + % The cell used to simulate liquid-solid shear in ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ /
717 + % water interfaces.  Velocity gradients were applied using the velocity
718 + % shearing and scaling variant of reverse non-equilibrium molecular
719 + % dynamics (VSS-RNEMD) with a weak thermal gradient to prevent melting.
720 + % The interface width is relatively robust in both structual and dynamic
721 + % measures as a function of the applied shear.
722 + % \end{tocentry}
723 +
724   \end{document}
725  
726   %**************************************************************

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines