ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceWater2/Supplemental_Information.tex
Revision: 4268
Committed: Wed Dec 31 17:25:13 2014 UTC (9 years, 8 months ago) by gezelter
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 14809 byte(s)
Log Message:
JCP version now that PNAS said no

File Contents

# Content
1 %load any "/usepackage" here...
2 \documentclass{pnastwo}
3
4 %% ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL STYLE FILES Font specification
5
6 %\usepackage{PNASTWOF}
7 \usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}
8 \usepackage[round,numbers,sort&compress]{natbib}
9 \usepackage{fixltx2e}
10 \usepackage{booktabs}
11 \usepackage{multirow}
12 \usepackage{tablefootnote}
13
14 \bibpunct{(}{)}{,}{n}{,}{,}
15 \bibliographystyle{pnas2011}
16
17 \renewcommand{\thefigure}{S\arabic{figure}}
18 \renewcommand{\thetable}{S\arabic{table}}
19 \renewcommand{\theequation}{S\arabic{equation}}
20 \renewcommand{\thesection}{S\arabic{section}}
21
22 %% OPTIONAL MACRO DEFINITIONS
23 \def\s{\sigma}
24 %%%%%%%%%%%%
25 %% For PNAS Only:
26 %\url{www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0709640104}
27 \copyrightyear{2014}
28 \issuedate{Issue Date}
29 \volume{Volume}
30 \issuenumber{Issue Number}
31 %\setcounter{page}{2687} %Set page number here if desired
32 %%%%%%%%%%%%
33
34 \begin{document}
35
36 \title{Supporting Information for: \\
37 The different facets of ice have different hydrophilicities: Friction at water /
38 ice-I\textsubscript{h} interfaces}
39
40 \author{Patrick B. Louden\affil{1}{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame,
41 IN 46556}
42 \and
43 J. Daniel Gezelter\affil{1}{}}
44
45 \contributor{Submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
46 of the United States of America}
47
48 \maketitle
49
50 \begin{article}
51
52 \section{Overview}
53 The supporting information contains further details about the model
54 construction, analysis methods, and supplies figures that support the
55 data presented in the main text.
56
57 \section{Construction of the Ice / Water interfaces}
58 Ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ crystallizes in the hexagonal space group
59 P$6_3/mmc$, and common ice crystals form hexagonal plates with the
60 basal face, $\{0~0~0~1\}$, forming the top and bottom of each plate, and
61 the prismatic facet, $\{1~0~\bar{1}~0\}$, forming the sides. In extreme
62 temperatures or low water saturation conditions, ice crystals can
63 easily form as hollow columns, needles and dendrites. These are
64 structures that expose other crystalline facets of the ice to the
65 surroundings. Among the more common facets are the secondary prism,
66 $\{1~1~\bar{2}~0\}$, and pyramidal, $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$, faces.
67
68 We found it most useful to work with proton-ordered, zero-dipole
69 crystals that expose strips of dangling H-atoms and lone
70 pairs~\cite{Buch:2008fk}. Our structures were created starting from
71 Structure 6 of Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e's set of orthorhombic
72 representations for ice-I$_{h}$~\cite{Hirsch04}. This crystal
73 structure was cleaved along the four different facets. The exposed
74 face was reoriented normal to the $z$-axis of the simulation cell, and
75 the structures were extended to form large exposed facets in
76 rectangular box geometries. Liquid water boxes were created with
77 identical dimensions (in $x$ and $y$) as the ice, with a $z$ dimension
78 of three times that of the ice block, and a density corresponding to 1
79 g / cm$^3$. Each of the ice slabs and water boxes were independently
80 equilibrated at a pressure of 1 atm, and the resulting systems were
81 merged by carving out any liquid water molecules within 3 \AA\ of any
82 atoms in the ice slabs. Each of the combined ice/water systems were
83 then equilibrated at 225K, which is the liquid-ice coexistence
84 temperature for SPC/E water~\cite{Bryk02}. Reference
85 \citealp{Louden13} contains a more detailed explanation of the
86 construction of similar ice/water interfaces. The resulting dimensions
87 as well as the number of ice and liquid water molecules contained in
88 each of these systems are shown in Table S1.
89
90 \section{Further details on the shearing (RNEMD) simulations}
91 All simulations were performed using OpenMD~\cite{OOPSE,openmd}, with a
92 time step of 2 fs and periodic boundary conditions in all three
93 dimensions. Electrostatics were handled using the damped-shifted
94 force real-space electrostatic kernel~\cite{Ewald}. The systems were
95 divided into 100 bins along the $z$-axis for the VSS-RNEMD moves,
96 which were attempted every 2~fs.
97
98 The interfaces were equilibrated for a total of 10 ns at equilibrium
99 conditions before being exposed to either a shear or thermal gradient.
100 This consisted of 5 ns under a constant temperature (NVT) integrator
101 set to 225~K followed by 5 ns under a microcanonical (NVE) integrator.
102 Weak thermal gradients were allowed to develop using the VSS-RNEMD
103 (NVE) integrator using a small thermal flux ($-2.0\times 10^{-6}$
104 kcal/mol/\AA$^2$/fs) for a duration of 5 ns to allow the gradient to
105 stabilize. The resulting temperature gradient was $\approx$ 10K over
106 the entire box length, which was sufficient to keep the temperature at
107 the interface within $\pm 1$ K of the 225~K target.
108
109 Velocity gradients were then imposed using the VSS-RNEMD (NVE)
110 integrator with a range of momentum fluxes. These gradients were
111 allowed to stabilize for 1~ns before data collection started. Once
112 established, four successive 0.5~ns runs were performed for each shear
113 rate. During these simulations, configurations of the system were
114 stored every 1~ps, and statistics on the structure and dynamics in
115 each bin were accumulated throughout the simulations. Although there
116 was some small variation in the measured interfacial width between
117 succcessive runs, no indication of bulk melting or crystallization was
118 observed. That is, no large scale changes in the positions of the top
119 and bottom interfaces occurred during the simulations.
120
121 \section{A second method for computing contact angles}
122 In addition to the spherical cap method outlined in the main text, a
123 second method for obtaining the contact angle was described by
124 Ruijter, Blake, and Coninck~\cite{Ruijter99}. This method uses a
125 cylindrical averaging of the droplet's density profile. A threshold
126 density of 0.5 g cm\textsuperscript{-3} is used to estimate the
127 location of the edge of the droplet. The $r$ and $z$-dependence of
128 the droplet's edge is then fit to a circle, and the contact angle is
129 computed from the intersection of the fit circle with the $z$-axis
130 location of the solid surface. Again, for each stored configuration,
131 the density profile in a set of annular shells was computed. Due to
132 large density fluctuations close to the ice, all shells located within
133 2 \AA\ of the ice surface were left out of the circular fits. The
134 height of the solid surface ($z_\mathrm{suface}$) along with the best
135 fitting origin ($z_\mathrm{droplet}$) and radius
136 ($r_\mathrm{droplet}$) of the droplet can then be used to compute the
137 contact angle,
138 \begin{equation}
139 \theta = 90 + \frac{180}{\pi} \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{z_\mathrm{droplet} -
140 z_\mathrm{surface}}{r_\mathrm{droplet}} \right).
141 \end{equation}
142
143 \section{Interfacial widths using structural information}
144 To determine the structural widths of the interfaces under shear, each
145 of the systems was divided into 100 bins along the $z$-dimension, and
146 the local tetrahedral order parameter (Eq. 5 in Reference
147 \citealp{Louden13}) was time-averaged in each bin for the duration of
148 the shearing simulation. The spatial dependence of this order
149 parameter, $q(z)$, is the tetrahedrality profile of the interface.
150 The lower panels in figures S2-S5 in the SI show tetrahedrality
151 profiles (in circles) for each of the four interfaces. The $q(z)$
152 function has a range of $(0,1)$, where a value of unity indicates a
153 perfectly tetrahedral environment. The $q(z)$ for the bulk liquid was
154 found to be $\approx~0.77$, while values of $\approx~0.92$ were more
155 common in the ice. The tetrahedrality profiles were fit using a
156 hyperbolic tangent function (see Eq. 6 in Reference
157 \citealp{Louden13}) designed to smoothly fit the bulk to ice
158 transition while accounting for the weak thermal gradient. In panels
159 $b$ and $c$ of the same figures, the resulting thermal and velocity
160 gradients from an imposed kinetic energy and momentum fluxes can be
161 seen. The vertical dotted lines traversing these figures indicate the
162 midpoints of the interfaces as determined by the tetrahedrality
163 profiles.
164
165 \section{Interfacial widths using dynamic information}
166 To determine the dynamic widths of the interfaces under shear, each of
167 the systems was divided into bins along the $z$-dimension ($\approx$ 3
168 \AA\ wide) and $C_2(z,t)$ was computed using only those molecules that
169 were in the bin at the initial time. To compute these correlation
170 functions, each of the 0.5 ns simulations was followed by a shorter
171 200 ps microcanonical (NVE) simulation in which the positions and
172 orientations of every molecule in the system were recorded every 0.1
173 ps.
174
175 The time-dependence was fit to a triexponential decay, with three time
176 constants: $\tau_{short}$, measuring the librational motion of the
177 water molecules, $\tau_{middle}$, measuring the timescale for breaking
178 and making of hydrogen bonds, and $\tau_{long}$, corresponding to the
179 translational motion of the water molecules. An additional constant
180 was introduced in the fits to describe molecules in the crystal which
181 do not experience long-time orientational decay.
182
183 In Figures S6-S9, the $z$-coordinate profiles for the three decay
184 constants, $\tau_{short}$, $\tau_{middle}$, and $\tau_{long}$ for the
185 different interfaces are shown. (Figures S6 \& S7 are new results,
186 and Figures S8 \& S9 are updated plots from Ref \citealp{Louden13}.)
187 In the liquid regions of all four interfaces, we observe
188 $\tau_{middle}$ and $\tau_{long}$ to have approximately consistent
189 values of $3-6$ ps and $30-40$ ps, respectively. Both of these times
190 increase in value approaching the interface. Approaching the
191 interface, we also observe that $\tau_{short}$ decreases from its
192 liquid-state value of $72-76$ fs. The approximate values for the
193 decay constants and the trends approaching the interface match those
194 reported previously for the basal and prismatic interfaces.
195
196 We have estimated the dynamic interfacial width $d_\mathrm{dyn}$ by
197 fitting the profiles of all the three orientational time constants
198 with an exponential decay to the bulk-liquid behavior,
199 \begin{equation}\label{tauFit}
200 \tau(z)\approx\tau_{liquid}+(\tau_{wall}-\tau_{liquid})e^{-(z-z_{wall})/d_\mathrm{dyn}}
201 \end{equation}
202 where $\tau_{liquid}$ and $\tau_{wall}$ are the liquid and projected
203 wall values of the decay constants, $z_{wall}$ is the location of the
204 interface, as measured by the structural order parameter. These
205 values are shown in table 1 in the main text. Because the bins must be
206 quite wide to obtain reasonable profiles of $C_2(z,t)$, the error
207 estimates for the dynamic widths of the interface are significantly
208 larger than for the structural widths. However, all four interfaces
209 exhibit dynamic widths that are significantly below 1~nm, and are in
210 reasonable agreement with the structural width above.
211
212 \bibliography{iceWater}
213 \end{article}
214
215 \begin{table}[h]
216 \centering
217 \caption{Sizes of the droplet and shearing simulations. Cell
218 dimensions are measured in \AA. \label{tab:method}}
219 \begin{tabular}{r|cccc|ccccc}
220 \toprule
221 \multirow{2}{*}{Interface} & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Droplet} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Shearing} \\
222 & $N_\mathrm{ice}$ & $N_\mathrm{droplet}$ & $L_x$ & $L_y$ & $N_\mathrm{ice}$ & $N_\mathrm{liquid}$ & $L_x$ & $L_y$ & $L_z$ \\
223 \midrule
224 Basal $\{0001\}$ & 12960 & 2048 & 134.70 & 140.04 & 900 & 1846 & 23.87 & 35.83 & 98.64 \\
225 Pyramidal $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$ & 11136 & 2048 & 143.75 & 121.41 & 1216 & 2203 & 37.47 & 29.50 & 93.02 \\
226 Prismatic $\{1~0~\bar{1}~0\}$ & 9900 & 2048 & 110.04 & 115.00 & 3000 & 5464 & 35.95 & 35.65 & 205.77 \\
227 Secondary Prism $\{1~1~\bar{2}~0\}$ & 11520 & 2048 & 146.72 & 124.48 & 3840 & 8176 & 71.87 & 31.66 & 161.55 \\
228 \bottomrule
229 \end{tabular}
230 \end{table}
231
232 %S1: contact angle
233 \begin{figure}
234 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ContactAngle}
235 \caption{\label{fig:ContactAngle} The dynamic contact angle of a
236 droplet after approaching each of the four ice facets. The decay to
237 an equilibrium contact angle displays similar dynamics. Although
238 all the surfaces are hydrophilic, the long-time behavior stabilizes
239 to significantly flatter droplets for the basal and pyramidal
240 facets. This suggests a difference in hydrophilicity for these
241 facets compared with the two prismatic facets.}
242 \end{figure}
243
244
245 %S2-S5 are the z-rnemd profiles
246 \begin{figure}
247 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Pyr_comic_strip}
248 \caption{\label{fig:pyrComic} Properties of the pyramidal interface
249 being sheared through water at 3.8 ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Lower
250 panel: the local tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z)$, (circles) and
251 the hyperbolic tangent fit (turquoise line). Middle panel: the
252 imposed thermal gradient required to maintain a fixed interfacial
253 temperature of 225 K. Upper panel: the transverse velocity gradient
254 that develops in response to an imposed momentum flux. The vertical
255 dotted lines indicate the locations of the midpoints of the two
256 interfaces.}
257 \end{figure}
258
259 \begin{figure}
260 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SP_comic_strip}
261 \caption{\label{fig:spComic} The secondary prism interface with a shear
262 rate of 3.5 \
263 ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Panel descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:pyrComic}.}
264 \end{figure}
265
266 \begin{figure}
267 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{B_comic_strip}
268 \caption{\label{fig:bComic} The basal interface with a shear
269 rate of 1.3 \
270 ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Panel descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:pyrComic}.}
271 \end{figure}
272
273 \begin{figure}
274 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{prismatic_comic_strip}
275 \caption{\label{fig:pComic} The prismatic interface with a shear
276 rate of 2 \
277 ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Panel descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:pyrComic}.}
278 \end{figure}
279
280 %Figures S6-S9 are the z-orientation times
281 \begin{figure}
282 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Pyr-orient}
283 \caption{\label{fig:PyrOrient} The three decay constants of the
284 orientational time correlation function, $C_2(z,t)$, for water as a
285 function of distance from the center of the ice slab. The vertical
286 dashed line indicates the edge of the pyramidal ice slab determined
287 by the local order tetrahedral parameter. The control (circles) and
288 sheared (squares) simulations were fit using shifted-exponential
289 decay (see Eq. 9 in Ref. \citealp{Louden13}).}
290 \end{figure}
291
292 \begin{figure}
293 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SP-orient}
294 \caption{\label{fig:SPorient} Decay constants for $C_2(z,t)$ at the secondary
295 prism face. Panel descriptions match those in \ref{fig:PyrOrient}.}
296 \end{figure}
297
298
299 \begin{figure}
300 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{B-orient}
301 \caption{\label{fig:Borient} Decay constants for $C_2(z,t)$ at the basal face. Panel descriptions match those in \ref{fig:PyrOrient}.}
302 \end{figure}
303
304 \begin{figure}
305 \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{prismatic-orient}
306 \caption{\label{fig:Porient} Decay constants for $C_2(z,t)$ at the
307 prismatic face. Panel descriptions match those in \ref{fig:PyrOrient}.}
308 \end{figure}
309
310
311 \end{document}