1 |
%load any "/usepackage" here... |
2 |
\documentclass{pnastwo} |
3 |
|
4 |
%% ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL STYLE FILES Font specification |
5 |
|
6 |
%\usepackage{PNASTWOF} |
7 |
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem} |
8 |
\usepackage[round,numbers,sort&compress]{natbib} |
9 |
\usepackage{fixltx2e} |
10 |
\usepackage{booktabs} |
11 |
\usepackage{multirow} |
12 |
\usepackage{tablefootnote} |
13 |
|
14 |
\bibpunct{(}{)}{,}{n}{,}{,} |
15 |
\bibliographystyle{pnas2011} |
16 |
|
17 |
\renewcommand{\thefigure}{S\arabic{figure}} |
18 |
\renewcommand{\thetable}{S\arabic{table}} |
19 |
\renewcommand{\theequation}{S\arabic{equation}} |
20 |
\renewcommand{\thesection}{S\arabic{section}} |
21 |
|
22 |
%% OPTIONAL MACRO DEFINITIONS |
23 |
\def\s{\sigma} |
24 |
%%%%%%%%%%%% |
25 |
%% For PNAS Only: |
26 |
%\url{www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0709640104} |
27 |
\copyrightyear{2014} |
28 |
\issuedate{Issue Date} |
29 |
\volume{Volume} |
30 |
\issuenumber{Issue Number} |
31 |
%\setcounter{page}{2687} %Set page number here if desired |
32 |
%%%%%%%%%%%% |
33 |
|
34 |
\begin{document} |
35 |
|
36 |
\title{Supporting Information for: \\ |
37 |
The different facets of ice have different hydrophilicities: Friction at water / |
38 |
ice-I\textsubscript{h} interfaces} |
39 |
|
40 |
\author{Patrick B. Louden\affil{1}{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, |
41 |
IN 46556} |
42 |
\and |
43 |
J. Daniel Gezelter\affil{1}{}} |
44 |
|
45 |
\contributor{Submitted to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences |
46 |
of the United States of America} |
47 |
|
48 |
\maketitle |
49 |
|
50 |
\begin{article} |
51 |
|
52 |
\section{Overview} |
53 |
The supporting information contains further details about the model |
54 |
construction, analysis methods, and supplies figures that support the |
55 |
data presented in the main text. |
56 |
|
57 |
\section{Construction of the Ice / Water interfaces} |
58 |
Ice I$_\mathrm{h}$ crystallizes in the hexagonal space group |
59 |
P$6_3/mmc$, and common ice crystals form hexagonal plates with the |
60 |
basal face, $\{0~0~0~1\}$, forming the top and bottom of each plate, and |
61 |
the prismatic facet, $\{1~0~\bar{1}~0\}$, forming the sides. In extreme |
62 |
temperatures or low water saturation conditions, ice crystals can |
63 |
easily form as hollow columns, needles and dendrites. These are |
64 |
structures that expose other crystalline facets of the ice to the |
65 |
surroundings. Among the more common facets are the secondary prism, |
66 |
$\{1~1~\bar{2}~0\}$, and pyramidal, $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$, faces. |
67 |
|
68 |
We found it most useful to work with proton-ordered, zero-dipole |
69 |
crystals that expose strips of dangling H-atoms and lone |
70 |
pairs~\cite{Buch:2008fk}. Our structures were created starting from |
71 |
Structure 6 of Hirsch and Ojam\"{a}e's set of orthorhombic |
72 |
representations for ice-I$_{h}$~\cite{Hirsch04}. This crystal |
73 |
structure was cleaved along the four different facets. The exposed |
74 |
face was reoriented normal to the $z$-axis of the simulation cell, and |
75 |
the structures were extended to form large exposed facets in |
76 |
rectangular box geometries. Liquid water boxes were created with |
77 |
identical dimensions (in $x$ and $y$) as the ice, with a $z$ dimension |
78 |
of three times that of the ice block, and a density corresponding to 1 |
79 |
g / cm$^3$. Each of the ice slabs and water boxes were independently |
80 |
equilibrated at a pressure of 1 atm, and the resulting systems were |
81 |
merged by carving out any liquid water molecules within 3 \AA\ of any |
82 |
atoms in the ice slabs. Each of the combined ice/water systems were |
83 |
then equilibrated at 225K, which is the liquid-ice coexistence |
84 |
temperature for SPC/E water~\cite{Bryk02}. Reference |
85 |
\citealp{Louden13} contains a more detailed explanation of the |
86 |
construction of similar ice/water interfaces. The resulting dimensions |
87 |
as well as the number of ice and liquid water molecules contained in |
88 |
each of these systems are shown in Table S1. |
89 |
|
90 |
\section{Further details on the shearing (RNEMD) simulations} |
91 |
All simulations were performed using OpenMD~\cite{OOPSE,openmd}, with a |
92 |
time step of 2 fs and periodic boundary conditions in all three |
93 |
dimensions. Electrostatics were handled using the damped-shifted |
94 |
force real-space electrostatic kernel~\cite{Ewald}. The systems were |
95 |
divided into 100 bins along the $z$-axis for the VSS-RNEMD moves, |
96 |
which were attempted every 2~fs. |
97 |
|
98 |
The interfaces were equilibrated for a total of 10 ns at equilibrium |
99 |
conditions before being exposed to either a shear or thermal gradient. |
100 |
This consisted of 5 ns under a constant temperature (NVT) integrator |
101 |
set to 225~K followed by 5 ns under a microcanonical (NVE) integrator. |
102 |
Weak thermal gradients were allowed to develop using the VSS-RNEMD |
103 |
(NVE) integrator using a small thermal flux ($-2.0\times 10^{-6}$ |
104 |
kcal/mol/\AA$^2$/fs) for a duration of 5 ns to allow the gradient to |
105 |
stabilize. The resulting temperature gradient was $\approx$ 10K over |
106 |
the entire box length, which was sufficient to keep the temperature at |
107 |
the interface within $\pm 1$ K of the 225~K target. |
108 |
|
109 |
Velocity gradients were then imposed using the VSS-RNEMD (NVE) |
110 |
integrator with a range of momentum fluxes. These gradients were |
111 |
allowed to stabilize for 1~ns before data collection started. Once |
112 |
established, four successive 0.5~ns runs were performed for each shear |
113 |
rate. During these simulations, configurations of the system were |
114 |
stored every 1~ps, and statistics on the structure and dynamics in |
115 |
each bin were accumulated throughout the simulations. Although there |
116 |
was some small variation in the measured interfacial width between |
117 |
succcessive runs, no indication of bulk melting or crystallization was |
118 |
observed. That is, no large scale changes in the positions of the top |
119 |
and bottom interfaces occurred during the simulations. |
120 |
|
121 |
\section{A second method for computing contact angles} |
122 |
In addition to the spherical cap method outlined in the main text, a |
123 |
second method for obtaining the contact angle was described by |
124 |
Ruijter, Blake, and Coninck~\cite{Ruijter99}. This method uses a |
125 |
cylindrical averaging of the droplet's density profile. A threshold |
126 |
density of 0.5 g cm\textsuperscript{-3} is used to estimate the |
127 |
location of the edge of the droplet. The $r$ and $z$-dependence of |
128 |
the droplet's edge is then fit to a circle, and the contact angle is |
129 |
computed from the intersection of the fit circle with the $z$-axis |
130 |
location of the solid surface. Again, for each stored configuration, |
131 |
the density profile in a set of annular shells was computed. Due to |
132 |
large density fluctuations close to the ice, all shells located within |
133 |
2 \AA\ of the ice surface were left out of the circular fits. The |
134 |
height of the solid surface ($z_\mathrm{suface}$) along with the best |
135 |
fitting origin ($z_\mathrm{droplet}$) and radius |
136 |
($r_\mathrm{droplet}$) of the droplet can then be used to compute the |
137 |
contact angle, |
138 |
\begin{equation} |
139 |
\theta = 90 + \frac{180}{\pi} \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{z_\mathrm{droplet} - |
140 |
z_\mathrm{surface}}{r_\mathrm{droplet}} \right). |
141 |
\end{equation} |
142 |
|
143 |
\section{Interfacial widths using structural information} |
144 |
To determine the structural widths of the interfaces under shear, each |
145 |
of the systems was divided into 100 bins along the $z$-dimension, and |
146 |
the local tetrahedral order parameter (Eq. 5 in Reference |
147 |
\citealp{Louden13}) was time-averaged in each bin for the duration of |
148 |
the shearing simulation. The spatial dependence of this order |
149 |
parameter, $q(z)$, is the tetrahedrality profile of the interface. |
150 |
The lower panels in figures S2-S5 in the SI show tetrahedrality |
151 |
profiles (in circles) for each of the four interfaces. The $q(z)$ |
152 |
function has a range of $(0,1)$, where a value of unity indicates a |
153 |
perfectly tetrahedral environment. The $q(z)$ for the bulk liquid was |
154 |
found to be $\approx~0.77$, while values of $\approx~0.92$ were more |
155 |
common in the ice. The tetrahedrality profiles were fit using a |
156 |
hyperbolic tangent function (see Eq. 6 in Reference |
157 |
\citealp{Louden13}) designed to smoothly fit the bulk to ice |
158 |
transition while accounting for the weak thermal gradient. In panels |
159 |
$b$ and $c$ of the same figures, the resulting thermal and velocity |
160 |
gradients from an imposed kinetic energy and momentum fluxes can be |
161 |
seen. The vertical dotted lines traversing these figures indicate the |
162 |
midpoints of the interfaces as determined by the tetrahedrality |
163 |
profiles. |
164 |
|
165 |
\section{Interfacial widths using dynamic information} |
166 |
To determine the dynamic widths of the interfaces under shear, each of |
167 |
the systems was divided into bins along the $z$-dimension ($\approx$ 3 |
168 |
\AA\ wide) and $C_2(z,t)$ was computed using only those molecules that |
169 |
were in the bin at the initial time. To compute these correlation |
170 |
functions, each of the 0.5 ns simulations was followed by a shorter |
171 |
200 ps microcanonical (NVE) simulation in which the positions and |
172 |
orientations of every molecule in the system were recorded every 0.1 |
173 |
ps. |
174 |
|
175 |
The time-dependence was fit to a triexponential decay, with three time |
176 |
constants: $\tau_{short}$, measuring the librational motion of the |
177 |
water molecules, $\tau_{middle}$, measuring the timescale for breaking |
178 |
and making of hydrogen bonds, and $\tau_{long}$, corresponding to the |
179 |
translational motion of the water molecules. An additional constant |
180 |
was introduced in the fits to describe molecules in the crystal which |
181 |
do not experience long-time orientational decay. |
182 |
|
183 |
In Figures S6-S9, the $z$-coordinate profiles for the three decay |
184 |
constants, $\tau_{short}$, $\tau_{middle}$, and $\tau_{long}$ for the |
185 |
different interfaces are shown. (Figures S6 \& S7 are new results, |
186 |
and Figures S8 \& S9 are updated plots from Ref \citealp{Louden13}.) |
187 |
In the liquid regions of all four interfaces, we observe |
188 |
$\tau_{middle}$ and $\tau_{long}$ to have approximately consistent |
189 |
values of $3-6$ ps and $30-40$ ps, respectively. Both of these times |
190 |
increase in value approaching the interface. Approaching the |
191 |
interface, we also observe that $\tau_{short}$ decreases from its |
192 |
liquid-state value of $72-76$ fs. The approximate values for the |
193 |
decay constants and the trends approaching the interface match those |
194 |
reported previously for the basal and prismatic interfaces. |
195 |
|
196 |
We have estimated the dynamic interfacial width $d_\mathrm{dyn}$ by |
197 |
fitting the profiles of all the three orientational time constants |
198 |
with an exponential decay to the bulk-liquid behavior, |
199 |
\begin{equation}\label{tauFit} |
200 |
\tau(z)\approx\tau_{liquid}+(\tau_{wall}-\tau_{liquid})e^{-(z-z_{wall})/d_\mathrm{dyn}} |
201 |
\end{equation} |
202 |
where $\tau_{liquid}$ and $\tau_{wall}$ are the liquid and projected |
203 |
wall values of the decay constants, $z_{wall}$ is the location of the |
204 |
interface, as measured by the structural order parameter. These |
205 |
values are shown in table 1 in the main text. Because the bins must be |
206 |
quite wide to obtain reasonable profiles of $C_2(z,t)$, the error |
207 |
estimates for the dynamic widths of the interface are significantly |
208 |
larger than for the structural widths. However, all four interfaces |
209 |
exhibit dynamic widths that are significantly below 1~nm, and are in |
210 |
reasonable agreement with the structural width above. |
211 |
|
212 |
\bibliography{iceWater} |
213 |
\end{article} |
214 |
|
215 |
\begin{table}[h] |
216 |
\centering |
217 |
\caption{Sizes of the droplet and shearing simulations. Cell |
218 |
dimensions are measured in \AA. \label{tab:method}} |
219 |
\begin{tabular}{r|cccc|ccccc} |
220 |
\toprule |
221 |
\multirow{2}{*}{Interface} & \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Droplet} & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Shearing} \\ |
222 |
& $N_\mathrm{ice}$ & $N_\mathrm{droplet}$ & $L_x$ & $L_y$ & $N_\mathrm{ice}$ & $N_\mathrm{liquid}$ & $L_x$ & $L_y$ & $L_z$ \\ |
223 |
\midrule |
224 |
Basal $\{0001\}$ & 12960 & 2048 & 134.70 & 140.04 & 900 & 1846 & 23.87 & 35.83 & 98.64 \\ |
225 |
Pyramidal $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$ & 11136 & 2048 & 143.75 & 121.41 & 1216 & 2203 & 37.47 & 29.50 & 93.02 \\ |
226 |
Prismatic $\{1~0~\bar{1}~0\}$ & 9900 & 2048 & 110.04 & 115.00 & 3000 & 5464 & 35.95 & 35.65 & 205.77 \\ |
227 |
Secondary Prism $\{1~1~\bar{2}~0\}$ & 11520 & 2048 & 146.72 & 124.48 & 3840 & 8176 & 71.87 & 31.66 & 161.55 \\ |
228 |
\bottomrule |
229 |
\end{tabular} |
230 |
\end{table} |
231 |
|
232 |
%S1: contact angle |
233 |
\begin{figure} |
234 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ContactAngle} |
235 |
\caption{\label{fig:ContactAngle} The dynamic contact angle of a |
236 |
droplet after approaching each of the four ice facets. The decay to |
237 |
an equilibrium contact angle displays similar dynamics. Although |
238 |
all the surfaces are hydrophilic, the long-time behavior stabilizes |
239 |
to significantly flatter droplets for the basal and pyramidal |
240 |
facets. This suggests a difference in hydrophilicity for these |
241 |
facets compared with the two prismatic facets.} |
242 |
\end{figure} |
243 |
|
244 |
|
245 |
%S2-S5 are the z-rnemd profiles |
246 |
\begin{figure} |
247 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Pyr_comic_strip} |
248 |
\caption{\label{fig:pyrComic} Properties of the pyramidal interface |
249 |
being sheared through water at 3.8 ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Lower |
250 |
panel: the local tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z)$, (circles) and |
251 |
the hyperbolic tangent fit (turquoise line). Middle panel: the |
252 |
imposed thermal gradient required to maintain a fixed interfacial |
253 |
temperature of 225 K. Upper panel: the transverse velocity gradient |
254 |
that develops in response to an imposed momentum flux. The vertical |
255 |
dotted lines indicate the locations of the midpoints of the two |
256 |
interfaces.} |
257 |
\end{figure} |
258 |
|
259 |
\begin{figure} |
260 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SP_comic_strip} |
261 |
\caption{\label{fig:spComic} The secondary prism interface with a shear |
262 |
rate of 3.5 \ |
263 |
ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Panel descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:pyrComic}.} |
264 |
\end{figure} |
265 |
|
266 |
\begin{figure} |
267 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{B_comic_strip} |
268 |
\caption{\label{fig:bComic} The basal interface with a shear |
269 |
rate of 1.3 \ |
270 |
ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Panel descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:pyrComic}.} |
271 |
\end{figure} |
272 |
|
273 |
\begin{figure} |
274 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{prismatic_comic_strip} |
275 |
\caption{\label{fig:pComic} The prismatic interface with a shear |
276 |
rate of 2 \ |
277 |
ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Panel descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:pyrComic}.} |
278 |
\end{figure} |
279 |
|
280 |
%Figures S6-S9 are the z-orientation times |
281 |
\begin{figure} |
282 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Pyr-orient} |
283 |
\caption{\label{fig:PyrOrient} The three decay constants of the |
284 |
orientational time correlation function, $C_2(z,t)$, for water as a |
285 |
function of distance from the center of the ice slab. The vertical |
286 |
dashed line indicates the edge of the pyramidal ice slab determined |
287 |
by the local order tetrahedral parameter. The control (circles) and |
288 |
sheared (squares) simulations were fit using shifted-exponential |
289 |
decay (see Eq. 9 in Ref. \citealp{Louden13}).} |
290 |
\end{figure} |
291 |
|
292 |
\begin{figure} |
293 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SP-orient} |
294 |
\caption{\label{fig:SPorient} Decay constants for $C_2(z,t)$ at the secondary |
295 |
prism face. Panel descriptions match those in \ref{fig:PyrOrient}.} |
296 |
\end{figure} |
297 |
|
298 |
|
299 |
\begin{figure} |
300 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{B-orient} |
301 |
\caption{\label{fig:Borient} Decay constants for $C_2(z,t)$ at the basal face. Panel descriptions match those in \ref{fig:PyrOrient}.} |
302 |
\end{figure} |
303 |
|
304 |
\begin{figure} |
305 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{prismatic-orient} |
306 |
\caption{\label{fig:Porient} Decay constants for $C_2(z,t)$ at the |
307 |
prismatic face. Panel descriptions match those in \ref{fig:PyrOrient}.} |
308 |
\end{figure} |
309 |
|
310 |
|
311 |
\end{document} |