1 |
\documentclass[11pt]{article} |
2 |
\usepackage{amsmath} |
3 |
\usepackage{amssymb} |
4 |
\usepackage{setspace} |
5 |
%\usepackage{endfloat} |
6 |
\usepackage{caption} |
7 |
%\usepackage{epsf} |
8 |
%\usepackage{tabularx} |
9 |
\usepackage{graphicx} |
10 |
\usepackage{multirow} |
11 |
\usepackage{wrapfig} |
12 |
%\usepackage{booktabs} |
13 |
%\usepackage{bibentry} |
14 |
%\usepackage{mathrsfs} |
15 |
%\usepackage[ref]{overcite} |
16 |
\usepackage[square, comma, sort&compress]{natbib} |
17 |
\usepackage{url} |
18 |
\pagestyle{plain} \pagenumbering{arabic} \oddsidemargin 0.0cm |
19 |
\evensidemargin 0.0cm \topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt \textheight |
20 |
9.0in \textwidth 6.5in \brokenpenalty=10000 |
21 |
|
22 |
% double space list of tables and figures |
23 |
%\AtBeginDelayedFloats{\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.66}} |
24 |
\setlength{\abovecaptionskip}{20 pt} |
25 |
\setlength{\belowcaptionskip}{30 pt} |
26 |
|
27 |
%\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional referenc note |
28 |
\bibpunct{}{}{,}{s}{}{;} |
29 |
\bibliographystyle{aip} |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
% \documentclass[journal = jpccck, manuscript = article]{achemso} |
33 |
% \setkeys{acs}{usetitle = true} |
34 |
% \usepackage{achemso} |
35 |
% \usepackage{natbib} |
36 |
% \usepackage{multirow} |
37 |
% \usepackage{wrapfig} |
38 |
% \usepackage{fixltx2e} |
39 |
|
40 |
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem} % this is a great package for formatting chemical reactions |
41 |
\usepackage{url} |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
\begin{document} |
45 |
|
46 |
\title{Simulations of solid-liquid friction at Secondary Prism and Pyramidal ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ / water interfaces} |
47 |
|
48 |
\author{Patrick B. Louden and J. Daniel |
49 |
Gezelter\footnote{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: |
50 |
gezelter@nd.edu} \\ |
51 |
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,\\ |
52 |
University of Notre Dame\\ |
53 |
Notre Dame, Indiana 46556} |
54 |
|
55 |
\date{\today} |
56 |
\maketitle |
57 |
\begin{doublespace} |
58 |
|
59 |
\begin{abstract} |
60 |
Abstract abstract abstract... |
61 |
\end{abstract} |
62 |
|
63 |
\newpage |
64 |
|
65 |
\section{Introduction} |
66 |
Explain a little bit about ice Ih, point group stuff. |
67 |
|
68 |
Mention previous work done / on going work by other people. Haymet and Rick |
69 |
seem to be investigating how the interfaces is perturbed by the presence of |
70 |
ions. This is the conlcusion of a recent publication of the basal and |
71 |
prismatic facets of ice Ih, now presenting the pyramidal and secondary |
72 |
prism facets under shear. |
73 |
|
74 |
\section{Methodology} |
75 |
|
76 |
\begin{figure} |
77 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SP_comic_strip} |
78 |
\caption{\label{fig:spComic} The secondary prism interface with a shear |
79 |
rate of 3.5 ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Lower panel: the local tetrahedral order |
80 |
parameter, $q(z)$, (black circles) and the hyperbolic tangent fit (red line). |
81 |
Middle panel: the imposed thermal gradient required to maintain a fixed |
82 |
interfacial temperature. Upper panel: the transverse velocity gradient that |
83 |
develops in response to an imposed momentum flux. The vertical dotted lines |
84 |
indicate the locations of the midpoints of the two interfaces.} |
85 |
\end{figure} |
86 |
|
87 |
\begin{figure} |
88 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Pyr_comic_strip} |
89 |
\caption{\label{fig:pyrComic} The pyramidal interface with a shear rate of 3.8 \ |
90 |
ms\textsuperscript{-1}. Panel descriptions match those in figure \ref{fig:spComic}.} |
91 |
\end{figure} |
92 |
|
93 |
\subsection{Pyramidal and secondary prism system construction} |
94 |
|
95 |
The construction of the pyramidal and secondary prism systems follows that of |
96 |
the basal and prismatic systems presented elsewhere\cite{Louden13}, however |
97 |
the ice crystals and water boxes were equilibrated and combined at 50K |
98 |
instead of 225K. The ice / water systems generated were then equilibrated |
99 |
to 225K. The resulting pyramidal system was |
100 |
$37.47 \times 29.50 \times 93.02$ \AA\ with 1216 |
101 |
SPC/E molecules in the ice slab, and 2203 in the liquid phase. The secondary |
102 |
prism system generated was $71.87 \times 31.66 \times 161.55$ \AA\ with 3840 |
103 |
SPC/E molecules in the ice slab and 8176 molecules in the liquid phase. |
104 |
|
105 |
\subsection{Computational details} |
106 |
% Do we need to justify the sims at 225K? |
107 |
% No crystal growth or shrinkage over 2 successive 1 ns NVT simulations for |
108 |
% either the pyramidal or sec. prism ice/water systems. |
109 |
|
110 |
The computational details performed here were equivalent to those reported |
111 |
in the previous publication\cite{Louden13}. The only changes made to the |
112 |
previously reported procedure were the following. VSS-RNEMD moves were |
113 |
attempted every 2 fs instead of every 50 fs. This was done to minimize |
114 |
the magnitude of each individual VSS-RNEMD perturbation to the system. |
115 |
|
116 |
All pyramidal simulations were performed under the NVT ensamble except those |
117 |
during which statistics were accumulated for the orientational correlation |
118 |
function, which were performed under the NVE ensamble. All secondary prism |
119 |
simulations were performed under the NVE ensamble. |
120 |
|
121 |
\section{Results and discussion} |
122 |
\subsection{Interfacial width} |
123 |
In the literature there is good agreement that between the solid ice and |
124 |
the bulk water, there exists a region of 'slush-like' water molecules. |
125 |
In this region, the water molecules are structured differently and |
126 |
behave differently than those of the solid ice or the bulk water. |
127 |
The characteristics of this region have been defined by both structural |
128 |
and dynamic properties; and its width has been measured by the change of these |
129 |
properties from their bulk liquid values to those of the solid ice. |
130 |
Examples of these properties include the density, the diffusion constant, and |
131 |
the translational order profile. \cite{Bryk02,Karim90,Gay02,Hayword01,Hayword02,Karim88} |
132 |
|
133 |
Since the VSS-RNEMD moves used to impose the thermal and velocity gradients |
134 |
perturb the momenta of the water molecules in |
135 |
the systems, parameters that depend on translational motion may give |
136 |
faulty results. A stuructural parameter will be less effected by the |
137 |
VSS-RNEMD perturbations to the system. Due to this, we have used the |
138 |
local order tetrahedral parameter to quantify the width of the interface, |
139 |
which was originally described by Kumar\cite{Kumar09} and |
140 |
Errington\cite{Errington01} and explained in our |
141 |
previous publication\cite{Louden13} in relation to an ice/water system. |
142 |
|
143 |
Paragraph and eq. for tetrahedrality here. |
144 |
|
145 |
To determine the width of the interfaces, each of the systems were |
146 |
divided into 100 artificial bins along the |
147 |
$z$-dimension, and the local tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z)$, was |
148 |
time-averaged for each of the bins, resulting in a tetrahedrality profile of |
149 |
the system. These profiles are shown across the $z$-dimension of the systems |
150 |
in panel $a$ of Figures \ref{fig:spComic} |
151 |
and \ref{fig:pyrComic} (black circles). The $q(z)$ function has a range of |
152 |
(0,1), where a larger value indicates a more tetrahedral environment. |
153 |
The $q(z)$ for the bulk liquid was found to be $\approx $ 0.77, while values of |
154 |
$\approx $0.92 were more common for the ice. The tetrahedrality profiles were |
155 |
fit using a hyperbolic tangent\cite{Louden13} designed to smoothly fit the |
156 |
bulk to ice |
157 |
transition, while accounting for the thermal influence on the profile by the |
158 |
kinetic energy exchanges of the VSS-RNEMD moves. In panels $b$ and $c$, the |
159 |
imposed thermal and velocity gradients can be seen. The verticle dotted |
160 |
lines traversing all three panels indicate the midpoints of the interface |
161 |
as determined by the hyperbolic tangent fit of the tetrahedrality profiles. |
162 |
|
163 |
From fitting the tetrahedrality profiles for each of the 0.5 nanosecond |
164 |
simulations (panel c of Figures \ref{fig:spComic} and \ref{fig:pyrComic}) |
165 |
by Eq. 6\cite{Louden13},we find the interfacial width to be |
166 |
$3.2 \pm 0.2$ and $3.2 \pm 0.2$ \AA\ for the control system with no applied |
167 |
momentum flux for both the pyramidal and secondary prism systems. |
168 |
Over the range of shear rates investigated, |
169 |
$0.6 \pm 0.2 \mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow 5.6 \pm 0.4 \mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for |
170 |
the pyramidal system and $0.9 \pm 0.3 \mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow 5.4 \pm 0.1 |
171 |
\mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the secondary prism, we found no significant change in |
172 |
the interfacial width. This follows our previous findings of the basal and |
173 |
prismatic systems, in which the interfacial width was invarient of the |
174 |
shear rate of the ice. The interfacial width of the quiescent basal and |
175 |
prismatic systems was found to be $3.2 \pm 0.4$ \AA\ and $3.6 \pm 0.2$ \AA\ |
176 |
respectively. Over the range of shear rates investigated, $0.6 \pm 0.3 |
177 |
\mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow 5.3 \pm 0.5 \mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the basal |
178 |
system and $0.9 \pm 0.2 \mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow 4.5 \pm 0.1 |
179 |
\mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the prismatic. |
180 |
|
181 |
These results indicate that the surface structure of the exposed ice crystal |
182 |
has little to no effect on how far into the bulk the ice-like structural |
183 |
ordering is. Also, it appears that the interface is not structurally effected |
184 |
by shearing the ice through water. |
185 |
|
186 |
|
187 |
\subsection{Orientational dynamics} |
188 |
%Should we include the math here? |
189 |
The orientational time correlation function, |
190 |
\begin{equation}\label{C(t)1} |
191 |
C_{2}(t)=\langle P_{2}(\mathbf{u}(0)\cdot \mathbf{u}(t))\rangle, |
192 |
\end{equation} |
193 |
helps indicate the local environment around the water molecules. The function |
194 |
begins with an initial value of unity, and decays to zero as the water molecule |
195 |
loses memory of its former orientation. Observing the rate at which this decay |
196 |
occurs can provide insight to the mechanism and timescales for the relaxation. |
197 |
In eq. \eqref{C(t)1}, $P_{2}$ is the second-order Legendre polynomial, and |
198 |
$\mathbf{u}$ is the the bisecting HOH vector. The angle brackets indicate |
199 |
an ensemble average over all the water molecules in a given spatial region. |
200 |
|
201 |
To investigate the dynamics of the water molecules across the interface, the |
202 |
systems were divided in the $z$-dimension into bins, each $\approx$ 3 \AA\ |
203 |
wide, and \eqref{C(t)1} was computed for each of the bins. A water |
204 |
molecule was allocated to a particular bin if it was initially in the bin |
205 |
at time zero. To compute \eqref{C(t)1}, each 0.5 ns simulation was followed |
206 |
by an additional 200 ps microcanonical (NVE) simulation during which the |
207 |
position and orientations of each molecule were recorded every 0.1 ps. |
208 |
|
209 |
The data obtained for each bin was then fit to a triexponential decay given by |
210 |
\begin{equation}\label{C(t)_fit} |
211 |
C_{2}(t) \approx a e^{-t/\tau_\mathrm{short}} + b e^{-t/\tau_\mathrm{middle}} +\ |
212 |
c |
213 |
e^{-t/\tau_\mathrm{long}} + (1-a-b-c) |
214 |
\end{equation} |
215 |
where $\tau_{short}$ corresponds to the librational motion of the water |
216 |
molecules, $\tau_{middle}$ corresponds to jumps between the breaking and |
217 |
making of hydrogen bonds, and $\tau_{long}$ corresponds to the translational |
218 |
motion of the water molecules. The last term in \eqref{C(t)_fit} accounts |
219 |
for the water molecules trapped in the ice which do not experience any |
220 |
long-time orientational decay. |
221 |
|
222 |
In Figures \ref{fig:PyrOrient} and \ref{fig:SPorient} we see the $z$-coordinate |
223 |
profiles for the three decay constants, $\tau_{short}$ (panel a), |
224 |
$\tau_{middle}$ (panel b), |
225 |
and $\tau_{long}$ (panel c) for the pyramidal and secondary prismatic systems |
226 |
respectively. The control experiments (no shear) are shown in black, and |
227 |
an experiment with an imposed momentum flux is shown in red. The vertical |
228 |
dotted line traversing all three panels denotes the midpoint of the |
229 |
interface as determined by the local tetrahedral order parameter fitting. |
230 |
In the liquid regions of both systems, we see that $\tau_{middle}$ and |
231 |
$\tau_{long}$ have approximately consistent values of $3-6$ ps and $30-40$ ps, |
232 |
resepctively, and increase in value as we approach the interface. Conversely, |
233 |
in panel a, we see that $\tau_{short}$ decreases from the liquid value |
234 |
of $72-76$ fs as we approach the interface. We believe this speed up is due to |
235 |
the constrained motion of librations closer to the interface. Both the |
236 |
approximate values for the decays and relative trends match those reported |
237 |
previously for the basal and prismatic interfaces. |
238 |
|
239 |
As done previously, we have attempted to quantify the distance, $d_{pyramidal}$ |
240 |
and $d_{secondary prism}$, from the |
241 |
interface that the deviations from the bulk liquid values begin. This was done |
242 |
by fitting the orientational decay constant $z$-profiles by |
243 |
\begin{equation}\label{tauFit} |
244 |
\tau(z)\approx\tau_{liquid}+(\tau_{solid}-\tau_{liquid})e^{-(z-z_{wall})/d} |
245 |
\end{equation} |
246 |
where $\tau_{liquid}$ and $\tau_{solid}$ are the liquid and projected solid |
247 |
values of the decay constants, $z_{wall}$ is the location of the interface, |
248 |
and $d$ is the displacement from the interface at which these deviations |
249 |
occur. The values for $d_{pyramidal}$ and $d_{secondary prismatic}$ were |
250 |
determined |
251 |
for each of the decay constants, and then averaged for better statistics |
252 |
($\tau_{middle}$ was ommitted for secondary prism). For the pyramidal system, |
253 |
$d_{pyramidal}$ was found to be 2.7 \AA\ for both the control and the sheared |
254 |
system. We found $d_{secondary prismatic}$ to be slightly larger than |
255 |
$d_{pyramidal}$ for both the control and with an applied shear, with |
256 |
displacements of $4$ \AA\ for the control system and $3$ \AA\ for the |
257 |
experiment with the imposed momentum flux. These values are consistent with |
258 |
those found for the basal ($d_{basal}\approx2.9$ \AA\ ) and prismatic |
259 |
($d_{prismatic}\approx3.5$ \AA\ ) systems. |
260 |
|
261 |
\subsection{Coefficient of friction of the interfaces} |
262 |
While investigating the kinetic coefficient of friction for the larger |
263 |
prismatic system, there was found to be a dependence for $\mu_k$ |
264 |
on the temperature of the liquid water in the system. We believe this |
265 |
dependence |
266 |
arrises from the sharp discontinuity of the viscosity for the SPC/E model |
267 |
at temperatures approaching 200 K\cite{kuang12}. Due to this, we propose |
268 |
a weighting to the structural interfacial parameter, $\kappa$ by the |
269 |
viscosity at $225$ K, the temperature of the interface. $\kappa$ is |
270 |
traditionally defined as |
271 |
\begin{equation}\label{kappa} |
272 |
\kappa = \eta/\delta |
273 |
\end{equation} |
274 |
where $\eta$ is the viscosity and $\delta$ is the slip length. |
275 |
In our ice/water shearing simulations, the system has reached a steady state |
276 |
when the applied force, |
277 |
|
278 |
\begin{equation} |
279 |
f_{applied} = \mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})L_x L_y |
280 |
\end{equation} |
281 |
is equal to the frictional force resisting the motion of the ice block |
282 |
\begin{equation} |
283 |
f_{friction} = \frac{\eta \mathbf{v} L_x L_y}{\delta} |
284 |
\end{equation} |
285 |
where $\mathbf{v}$ is the relative velocity of the liquid from the ice. |
286 |
When this condition is met, we are able to solve the resulting expression to |
287 |
obtain, |
288 |
\begin{equation}\label{force_equality} |
289 |
\frac{\eta}{\delta} = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\mathbf{v}} |
290 |
\end{equation} |
291 |
From \eqref{kappa}, \eqref{force_equality} becomes |
292 |
\begin{equation} |
293 |
\kappa = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\mathbf{v}} |
294 |
\end{equation} |
295 |
which we will multiply by a viscosity weighting term to reach |
296 |
\begin{equation} \label{kappa2} |
297 |
\kappa = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\mathbf{v}} \frac{\eta(225)}{\eta(T)} |
298 |
\end{equation} |
299 |
Assuming linear response theory is valid, an expression for ($\eta$) can |
300 |
be found from the imposed momentum flux and the measured velocity gradient. |
301 |
\begin{equation}\label{eta_eq} |
302 |
\eta = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}} |
303 |
\end{equation} |
304 |
Substituting eq \eqref{eta_eq} into eq \eqref{kappa2} we arrive at |
305 |
\begin{equation} |
306 |
\kappa = \frac{\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}}{\mathbf{v}}\eta(225) |
307 |
\end{equation} |
308 |
|
309 |
To obtain the value of $\eta(225)$ for the SPC/E model, a $31.09 \times 29.38 |
310 |
\times 124.39$ \AA\ box with 3744 water molecules was equilibrated to 225K, |
311 |
and 6 unique shearing experiments were performed. Each experiment was |
312 |
conducted in the microcanonical ensemble (NVE) and were 1 ns in |
313 |
length. The VSS were attempted every timestep, which was set to 2 fs. |
314 |
|
315 |
|
316 |
\begin{table}[h] |
317 |
\centering |
318 |
\caption{Solid-liquid friction coefficients (measured in amu~fs\textsuperscript\ |
319 |
{-1}) } |
320 |
\label{tab:lambda} |
321 |
\begin{tabular}{|ccc|} \hline |
322 |
& \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Drag direction} \\ |
323 |
Interface & $x$ & $y$ \\ \hline |
324 |
basal\textsuperscript{a} & $0.08 \pm 0.02$ & $0.09 \pm 0.03$ \\ |
325 |
prismatic (T = 225)\textsuperscript{a} & $0.037 \pm 0.008$ & $0.04 \pm 0.01$ \\ |
326 |
prismatic (T = 230) & $0.10 \pm 0.01$ & $0.070 \pm 0.006$\\ |
327 |
pyramidal & $0.13 \pm 0.03$ & $0.14 \pm 0.03$ \\ |
328 |
secondary prism & $0.13 \pm 0.02$ & $0.12 \pm 0.03$ \\ \hline |
329 |
\end{tabular} |
330 |
\caption{\textsuperscript{a}Reference \cite{Louden13}} |
331 |
\end{table} |
332 |
|
333 |
|
334 |
\begin{figure} |
335 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{Pyr-orient} |
336 |
\caption{\label{fig:PyrOrient} The three decay constants of the |
337 |
orientational time correlation function, $C_2(t)$, for water as a function |
338 |
of distance from the center of the ice slab. The vertical dashed line |
339 |
indicates the edge of the pyramidal ice slab determined by the local order |
340 |
tetrahedral parameter. The control (black circles) and sheared (red squares) |
341 |
experiments were fit by a shifted exponential decay (Eq. 9\cite{Louden13}) |
342 |
shown by the black and red lines respectively. The upper two panels show that |
343 |
translational and hydrogen bond making and breaking events slow down |
344 |
through the interface while approaching the ice slab. The bottom most panel |
345 |
shows the librational motion of the water molecules speeding up approaching |
346 |
the ice block due to the confined region of space allowed for the molecules |
347 |
to move in.} |
348 |
\end{figure} |
349 |
|
350 |
\begin{figure} |
351 |
\includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{SP-orient-less} |
352 |
\caption{\label{fig:SPorient} Decay constants for $C_2(t)$ at the secondary |
353 |
prism face. Panel descriptions match those in \ref{fig:PyrOrient}.} |
354 |
\end{figure} |
355 |
|
356 |
|
357 |
|
358 |
\section{Conclusion} |
359 |
Conclude conclude conclude... |
360 |
|
361 |
\section{Acknowledgements} |
362 |
Support for this progect was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0848243. Computational time was provided by the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Notre Dame. |
363 |
|
364 |
|
365 |
\newpage |
366 |
\bibliography{iceWater} |
367 |
|
368 |
\end{doublespace} |
369 |
|
370 |
\end{document} |