ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceWater2/iceWater2.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceWater2/iceWater2.tex (file contents):
Revision 4219 by plouden, Fri Sep 12 20:59:54 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4224 by plouden, Tue Sep 16 19:35:19 2014 UTC

# Line 50 | Line 50 | Abstract abstract abstract...
50   \date{\today}
51  
52   \begin{abstract}
53 < Abstract abstract abstract...
53 >
54 >
55   \end{abstract}
56  
57   \maketitle
# Line 101 | Line 102 | in the previous publication\cite{Louden13}. The only c
102   %    either the pyramidal or sec. prism ice/water systems.
103  
104   The computational details performed here were equivalent to those reported
105 < in the previous publication\cite{Louden13}. The only changes made to the
105 > in our previous publication\cite{Louden13}. The only changes made to the
106   previously reported procedure were the following. VSS-RNEMD moves were
107   attempted every 2 fs instead of every 50 fs. This was done to minimize
108   the magnitude of each individual VSS-RNEMD perturbation to the system.
# Line 130 | Line 131 | Errington\cite{Errington01} and explained in our
131   VSS-RNEMD perturbations to the system. Due to this, we have used the
132   local order tetrahedral parameter to quantify the width of the interface,
133   which was originally described by Kumar\cite{Kumar09} and
134 < Errington\cite{Errington01} and explained in our
135 < previous publication\cite{Louden13} in relation to an ice/water system.
134 > Errington\cite{Errington01}, and used by Bryk and Haymet in a previous study
135 > of ice/water interfaces.\cite{Bryk2004b}
136  
137 < Paragraph and eq. for tetrahedrality here.
137 > The local tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z)$, is given by
138 > \begin{equation}
139 > q(z) = \int_0^L \sum_{k=1}^{N} \Bigg(1 -\frac{3}{8}\sum_{i=1}^{3}
140 > \sum_{j=i+1}^{4} \bigg(\cos\psi_{ikj}+\frac{1}{3}\bigg)^2\Bigg)
141 > \delta(z_{k}-z)\mathrm{d}z \Bigg/ N_z
142 > \label{eq:qz}
143 > \end{equation}
144 > where $\psi_{ikj}$ is the angle formed between the oxygen sites of molecules
145 > $i$,$k$, and $j$, where the centeral oxygen is located within molecule $k$ and
146 > molecules $i$ and $j$ are two of the closest four water molecules
147 > around molecule $k$. All four closest neighbors of molecule $k$ are also
148 > required to reside within the first peak of the pair distribution function
149 > for molecule $k$ (typically $<$ 3.41 \AA\ for water).
150 > $N_z = \int\delta(z_k - z) \mathrm{d}z$ is a normalization factor to account
151 > for the varying population of molecules within each finite-width bin.
152  
153   To determine the width of the interfaces, each of the systems were
154   divided into 100 artificial bins along the
# Line 188 | Line 203 | $\mathbf{u}$ is the the bisecting HOH vector. The angl
203   loses memory of its former orientation. Observing the rate at which this decay
204   occurs can provide insight to the mechanism and timescales for the relaxation.
205   In eq. \eqref{C(t)1}, $P_{2}$ is the second-order Legendre polynomial, and
206 < $\mathbf{u}$ is the the bisecting HOH vector. The angle brackets indicate
206 > $\mathbf{u}$ is the bisecting HOH vector. The angle brackets indicate
207   an ensemble average over all the water molecules in a given spatial region.
208  
209   To investigate the dynamics of the water molecules across the interface, the
# Line 252 | Line 267 | While investigating the kinetic coefficient of frictio
267   ($d_{prismatic}\approx3.5$ \AA\ ) systems.
268  
269   \subsection{Coefficient of friction of the interfaces}
270 < While investigating the kinetic coefficient of friction for the larger
271 < prismatic system, there was found to be a dependence for $\mu_k$
270 > While investigating the kinetic coefficient of friction, there was found
271 > to be a dependence for $\mu_k$
272   on the temperature of the liquid water in the system. We believe this
273   dependence
274   arrises from the sharp discontinuity of the viscosity for the SPC/E model
275   at temperatures approaching 200 K\cite{kuang12}. Due to this, we propose
276 < a weighting to the structural interfacial parameter, $\kappa$ by the
277 < viscosity at $225$ K, the temperature of the interface. $\kappa$ is
278 < traditionally defined as
279 < \begin{equation}\label{kappa}
280 < \kappa = \eta/\delta
276 > a weighting to the interfacial friction coefficient, $\kappa$ by the
277 > shear viscosity at 225 K. The interfacial friction coefficient relates
278 > the shear stress with the relative velocity of the fluid normal to the
279 > interface:
280 > \begin{equation}\label{Shenyu-13}
281 > j_{z}(p_{x}) = \kappa[v_{x}(fluid)-v_{x}(solid)]
282   \end{equation}
283 < where $\eta$ is the viscosity and $\delta$ is the slip length.
284 < In our ice/water shearing simulations, the system has reached a steady state
285 < when the applied force,
286 <
287 < \begin{equation}
288 < f_{applied} = \mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})L_x L_y
289 < \end{equation}
290 < is equal to the frictional force resisting the motion of the ice block
275 < \begin{equation}
276 < f_{friction} = \frac{\eta \mathbf{v} L_x L_y}{\delta}
283 > where $j_{z}(p_{x})$ is the applied momentum flux (shear stress) across $z$
284 > in the
285 > $x$-dimension, and $v_{x}$(fluid) and $v_{x}$(solid) are the velocities
286 > directly adjacent to the interface. The shear viscosity, $\eta(T)$, of the
287 > fluid can be determined if we assume a linear response of the momentum
288 > gradient to the applied shear stress by
289 > \begin{equation}\label{Shenyu-11}
290 > j_{z}(p_{x}) = \eta(T) \frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}.
291   \end{equation}
292 < where $\mathbf{v}$ is the relative velocity of the liquid from the ice.
293 < When this condition is met, we are able to solve the resulting expression to
294 < obtain,
295 < \begin{equation}\label{force_equality}
282 < \frac{\eta}{\delta} = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\mathbf{v}}
292 > Using eqs \eqref{Shenyu-13} and \eqref{Shenyu-11}, we can find the following
293 > expression for $\kappa$,
294 > \begin{equation}\label{kappa-1}
295 > \kappa = \eta(T) \frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}\frac{1}{[v_{x}(fluid)-v_{x}(solid)]}.
296   \end{equation}
297 < From \eqref{kappa}, \eqref{force_equality} becomes
298 < \begin{equation}
299 < \kappa = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\mathbf{v}}
297 > Here is where we will introduce the weighting term of $\eta(225)/\eta(T)$
298 > giving us
299 > \begin{equation}\label{kappa-2}
300 > \kappa = \frac{\eta(225)}{[v_{x}(fluid)-v_{x}(solid)]}\frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}.
301   \end{equation}
302 < which we will multiply by a viscosity weighting term to reach
303 < \begin{equation} \label{kappa2}
304 < \kappa = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\mathbf{v}} \frac{\eta(225)}{\eta(T)}
305 < \end{equation}
306 < Assuming linear response theory is valid, an expression for ($\eta$) can
307 < be found from the imposed momentum flux and the measured velocity gradient.
308 < \begin{equation}\label{eta_eq}
309 < \eta = \frac{\mathbf{j}_z(\mathbf{p})}{\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}}
310 < \end{equation}
311 < Substituting eq \eqref{eta_eq} into eq \eqref{kappa2} we arrive at
312 < \begin{equation}
313 <  \kappa = \frac{\frac{\partial v_x}{\partial z}}{\mathbf{v}}\eta(225)
302 >
303 > To obtain the value of $\eta(225)$ for the SPC/E model, a $31.09 \times 29.38
304 > \times 124.39$ \AA\ box with 3744 SPC/E water molecules was equilibrated to
305 > 225K,
306 > and 5 unique shearing experiments were performed. Each experiment was
307 > conducted in the microcanonical ensemble (NVE) and were 5 ns in
308 > length. The VSS were attempted every timestep, which was set to 2 fs.
309 > For our SPC/E systems, we found $\eta(225)$  to be $0.0148 \pm 0.0007$ Pa s,
310 > roughly ten times larger than the value found for 280 K SPC/E bulk water by
311 > Kuang\cite{kuang12}.
312 >
313 > The interfacial friction coefficient, $\kappa$, can equivalently be expressed
314 > as the ratio of the viscosity of the fluid to the slip length, $\delta$, which
315 > is an indication of how 'slippery' the interface is.
316 > \begin{equation}\label{kappa-3}
317 > \kappa = \frac{\eta}{\delta}
318   \end{equation}
319 + In each of the systems, the interfacial temperature was kept fixed to 225K,
320 + which ensured the viscosity of the fluid at the
321 + interace was approximately the same. Thus, any significant variation in
322 + $\kappa$ between
323 + the systems indicates differences in the 'slipperiness' of the interfaces.
324 + As each of the ice systems are sheared relative to liquid water, the
325 + 'slipperiness' of the interface can be taken as an indication of how
326 + hydrophobic or hydrophilic the interface is. The calculated $\kappa$ values
327 + found for the four crystal facets of Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ investigated are shown
328 + in Table \ref{tab:kapa}. The basal and pyramidal facets were found to have
329 + similar values of $\kappa \approx$ 0.0006 (units), while $\kappa \approx$
330 + 0.0003 (units) were found for the prismatic and secondary prismatic systems.
331 + These results indicate that the prismatic and secondary prismatic facets are
332 + more hydrophobic than the basal and pyramidal facets.
333 + %This indicates something about the similarity between the two facets that
334 + %share similar values...
335 + %Maybe find values for kappa for other materials to compare against?
336  
337   \begin{table}[h]
338   \centering
339 < \caption{$\kappa$ values for the basal, prismatic, pyramidal, and secondary    prismatic facets of Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$}
339 > \caption{$\kappa$ values for the basal, prismatic, pyramidal, and secondary    \
340 > prismatic facets of Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$}
341   \label{tab:kappa}
342   \begin{tabular}{|ccc|}  \hline
343 <           & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\kappa_{Drag direction}$} \\
343 >           & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\kappa_{Drag direction}$ (units)} \\
344   Interface & $\kappa_{x}$     & $\kappa_{y}$   \\ \hline
345       basal & $0.00059 \pm 0.00003$ & $0.00065 \pm 0.00008$ \\
346   prismatic & $0.00030 \pm 0.00002$ & $0.00030 \pm 0.00001$ \\
# Line 314 | Line 350 | To obtain the value of $\eta(225)$ for the SPC/E model
350   \end{table}
351  
352  
317 To obtain the value of $\eta(225)$ for the SPC/E model, a $31.09 \times 29.38
318 \times 124.39$ \AA\ box with 3744 water molecules was equilibrated to 225K,
319 and 5 unique shearing experiments were performed. Each experiment was
320 conducted in the microcanonical ensemble (NVE) and were 5 ns in
321 length. The VSS were attempted every timestep, which was set to 2 fs.
322 For our SPC/E systems, we found $\eta(225)$  to be $0.0148 \pm 0.0007 Pa s$,
323 roughly ten times larger than the value found for 280 K SPC/E water by
324 Kuang\cite{kuang12}.
353  
354  
355 < \begin{table}[h]
356 < \centering
357 < \caption{Solid-liquid friction coefficients (measured in amu~fs\textsuperscript\
358 < {-1}). \\
359 < \textsuperscript{a} See ref. \onlinecite{Louden13}. }
360 < \label{tab:lambda}
361 < \begin{tabular}{|ccc|}  \hline
362 <           & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Drag direction} \\
363 < Interface & $x$               & $y$  \\ \hline
364 <     basal\textsuperscript{a} &  $0.08 \pm 0.02$  & $0.09 \pm 0.03$ \\
365 < prismatic (T = 225)\textsuperscript{a} & $0.037 \pm 0.008$ & $0.04 \pm 0.01$ \\
366 < prismatic (T = 230) & $0.10 \pm 0.01$ & $0.070 \pm 0.006$\\
367 < pyramidal & $0.13 \pm 0.03$   & $0.14 \pm 0.03$ \\
368 < secondary prism & $0.13 \pm 0.02$ & $0.12 \pm 0.03$ \\ \hline
369 < \end{tabular}
370 < \end{table}
355 > %\begin{table}[h]
356 > %\centering
357 > %\caption{Solid-liquid friction coefficients (measured in amu~fs\textsuperscript\
358 > %{-1}). \\
359 > %\textsuperscript{a} See ref. \onlinecite{Louden13}. }
360 > %\label{tab:lambda}
361 > %\begin{tabular}{|ccc|}  \hline
362 > %           & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{Drag direction} \\
363 > % Interface & $x$               & $y$  \\ \hline
364 > %     basal\textsuperscript{a} &  $0.08 \pm 0.02$  & $0.09 \pm 0.03$ \\
365 > % prismatic (T = 225)\textsuperscript{a} & $0.037 \pm 0.008$ & $0.04 \pm 0.01$ \\
366 > % prismatic (T = 230) & $0.10 \pm 0.01$ & $0.070 \pm 0.006$\\
367 > % pyramidal & $0.13 \pm 0.03$   & $0.14 \pm 0.03$ \\
368 > % secondary prism & $0.13 \pm 0.02$ & $0.12 \pm 0.03$ \\ \hline
369 > %\end{tabular}
370 > %\end{table}
371  
372  
373   \begin{figure}
# Line 367 | Line 395 | Conclude conclude conclude...
395  
396  
397   \section{Conclusion}
398 < Conclude conclude conclude...
398 > We present the results of molecular dynamics simulations of the pyrmaidal
399 > and secondary prismatic facets of an SPC/E model of the
400 > Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$/water interface. The ice was sheared through the liquid
401 > water while being exposed to a thermal gradient to maintain a stable
402 > interface by using the minimal perturbing VSS RNEMD method. In agreement with
403 > our previous findings for the basal and prismatic facets, the interfacial
404 > width was found to be independent of shear rate as measured by the local
405 > tetrahedral order parameter. This width was found to be
406 > 3.2~$\pm$0.2~\AA\ for both the pyramidal and the secondary prismatic systems.
407 > These values are in good agreement with our previously calculated interfacial
408 > widths for the basal (3.2~$\pm$0.4~\AA\ ) and prismatic (3.6~$\pm$0.2~\AA\ )
409 > systems.
410  
411 + Orientational dynamics of the Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$/water interfaces were studied
412 + by calculation of the orientational time correlation function at varying
413 + displacements normal to the interface. The decays were fit
414 + to a tri-exponential decay, where the three decay constants correspond to
415 + the librational motion of the molecules driven by the restoring forces of
416 + existing hydrogen bonds ($\tau_{short}$ $\mathcal{O}$(10 fs)), jumps between
417 + two different hydrogen bonds ($\tau_{middle}$ $\mathcal{O}$(1 ps)), and
418 + translational motion of the molecules ($\tau_{long}$ $\mathcal{O}$(100 ps)).
419 + $\tau_{short}$ was found to decrease approaching the interface due to the
420 + constrained motion of the molecules as the local environment becomes more
421 + ice-like. Conversely, the two longer-time decay constants were found to
422 + increase at small displacements from the interface. As seen in our previous
423 + work on the basal and prismatic facets, there appears to be a dynamic
424 + interface width at which deviations from the bulk liquid values occur.
425 + We had previously found $d_{basal}$ and $d_{prismatic}$ to be approximately
426 + 2.8~\AA\ and 3.5~\AA\~. We found good agreement of these values for the
427 + pyramidal and secondary prismatic systems with $d_{pyramidal}$ and
428 + $d_{secondary prism}$ to be 2.7~\AA\ and 3~\AA\~. For all of the facets, there
429 + was found to be no apparent dependence of the dynamic width on the shear rate.
430 +  
431 + %Paragraph summarizing the Kappa values
432 + The interfacial friction coefficient, $\kappa$, was determined for each of the
433 + interfaces. We were able to reach an expression for $\kappa$ as a function of
434 + the velocity profile of the system and is scaled by the viscosity of the liquid
435 + at 225 K. In doing so, we have obtained an expression for $\kappa$ which is
436 + independent of temperature differences of the liquid water at far displacements
437 + from the interface. We found the basal and pyramidal facets to have
438 + similar $\kappa$ values, of $\kappa \approx$ 0.0006 (units). However, the
439 + prismatic and secondary prismatic facets were found to have $\kappa$ values of
440 + $\kappa \approx$ 0.0003 (units). As these ice facets are being sheared
441 + relative to liquid water, with the structural and dynamic width of all four
442 + interfaces being approximately the same, the difference in the coefficient of
443 + friction indicates the hydrophilicity of the crystal facets are not
444 + equivalent. Namely, that the basal and pyramidal facets of Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$
445 + are more hydrophilic than the prismatic and secondary prismatic facets.
446  
447 +
448   \begin{acknowledgments}
449    Support for this project was provided by the National
450    Science Foundation under grant CHE-1362211. Computational time was

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines