ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceWater2/iceWater3.tex
(Generate patch)

Comparing trunk/iceWater2/iceWater3.tex (file contents):
Revision 4253 by plouden, Mon Dec 15 14:21:07 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 4254 by gezelter, Mon Dec 15 16:38:35 2014 UTC

# Line 32 | Line 32
32  
33   \begin{document}
34  
35 < \title{Friction at water / ice-I\textsubscript{h} interfaces: Do the
36 <  different facets of ice have different hydrophilicities?}
35 > \title{The different facets of ice have different hydrophilicities:
36 >  Friction at water / ice-I\textsubscript{h} interfaces}
37  
38   \author{Patrick B. Louden\affil{1}{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame,
39   IN 46556}
# Line 51 | Line 51 | of the United States of America}
51  
52   \begin{article}
53    \begin{abstract}
54 <    In this paper we present evidence that some of the crystal facets
55 <    of ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ posess structural features that can halve
56 <    the effective hydrophilicity of the ice/water interface. The
57 <    spreading dynamics of liquid water droplets on ice facets exhibits
58 <    long-time behavior that differs substantially for the prismatic
54 >    We present evidence that some of the crystal facets of
55 >    ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ posess structural features that can reduce the
56 >    effective hydrophilicity of the ice/water interface. The spreading
57 >    dynamics of liquid water droplets on ice facets exhibits long-time
58 >    behavior that differs substantially for the prismatic
59      $\{1~0~\bar{1}~0\}$ and secondary prism $\{1~1~\bar{2}~0\}$ facets
60      when compared with the basal $\{0001\}$ and pyramidal
61      $\{2~0~\bar{2}~1\}$ facets.  We also present the results of
# Line 81 | Line 81 | degree of hydrophilicity of a surface can be described
81   surfaces do not have strong enough interactions with water to overcome
82   the internal attraction between molecules in the liquid phase, and the
83   degree of hydrophilicity of a surface can be described by the extent a
84 < droplet can spread out over the surface. The contact angle formed
85 < between the solid and the liquid depends on the free energies of the
86 < three interfaces involved, and is given by Young's
87 < equation.\cite{Young05}
84 > droplet can spread out over the surface. The contact angle, $\theta$,
85 > formed between the solid and the liquid depends on the free energies
86 > of the three interfaces involved, and is given by Young's
87 > equation~\cite{Young05},
88   \begin{equation}\label{young}
89   \cos\theta = (\gamma_{sv} - \gamma_{sl})/\gamma_{lv} .
90   \end{equation}
91   Here $\gamma_{sv}$, $\gamma_{sl}$, and $\gamma_{lv}$ are the free
92 < energies of the solid/vapor, solid/liquid, and liquid/vapor interfaces
92 > energies of the solid/vapor, solid/liquid, and liquid/vapor interfaces,
93   respectively.  Large contact angles, $\theta > 90^{\circ}$, correspond
94   to hydrophobic surfaces with low wettability, while small contact
95   angles, $\theta < 90^{\circ}$, correspond to hydrophilic surfaces.
96   Experimentally, measurements of the contact angle of sessile drops is
97   often used to quantify the extent of wetting on surfaces with
98   thermally selective wetting
99 < characteristics.\cite{Tadanaga00,Liu04,Sun04}
99 > characteristics~\cite{Tadanaga00,Liu04,Sun04}.
100  
101   Nanometer-scale structural features of a solid surface can influence
102   the hydrophilicity to a surprising degree.  Small changes in the
# Line 105 | Line 105 | electrically tunable Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel states h
105   \sim 0^{\circ}$.\cite{Koishi09} This is often referred to as the
106   Cassie-Baxter to Wenzel transition.  Nano-pillared surfaces with
107   electrically tunable Cassie-Baxter and Wenzel states have also been
108 < observed.\cite{Herbertson06,Dhindsa06,Verplanck07,Ahuja08,Manukyan11}
108 > observed~\cite{Herbertson06,Dhindsa06,Verplanck07,Ahuja08,Manukyan11}.
109   Luzar and coworkers have modeled these transitions on nano-patterned
110 < surfaces\cite{Daub07,Daub10,Daub11,Ritchie12}, and have found the
110 > surfaces~\cite{Daub07,Daub10,Daub11,Ritchie12}, and have found the
111   change in contact angle is due to the field-induced perturbation of
112 < hydrogen bonding at the liquid/vapor interface.\cite{Daub07}
112 > hydrogen bonding at the liquid/vapor interface~\cite{Daub07}.
113  
114   One would expect the interfaces of ice to be highly hydrophilic (and
115   possibly the most hydrophilic of all solid surfaces). In this paper we
116   present evidence that some of the crystal facets of ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$
117 < have structural features that can halve the effective hydrophilicity.
117 > have structural features that can reduce the effective hydrophilicity.
118   Our evidence for this comes from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations
119   of the spreading dynamics of liquid droplets on these facets, as well
120   as reverse non-equilibrium molecular dynamics (RNEMD) simulations of
# Line 135 | Line 135 | found QLL widths of approximately 10 \AA\ at 3 K below
135   quasi-liquid layer (QLL), at temperatures near the melting point.  MD
136   simulations of the facets of ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ exposed to vacuum have
137   found QLL widths of approximately 10 \AA\ at 3 K below the melting
138 < point.\cite{Conde08} Similarly, Limmer and Chandler have used the mW
138 > point~\cite{Conde08}. Similarly, Limmer and Chandler have used the mW
139   water model~\cite{Molinero09} and statistical field theory to estimate
140 < QLL widths at similar temperatures to be about 3 nm.\cite{Limmer14}
140 > QLL widths at similar temperatures to be about 3 nm~\cite{Limmer14}.
141  
142   Recently, Sazaki and Furukawa have developed a technique using laser
143   confocal microscopy combined with differential interference contrast
144   microscopy that has sufficient spatial and temporal resolution to
145   visulaize and quantitatively analyze QLLs on ice crystals at
146 < temperatures near melting.\cite{Sazaki10} They have found the width of
146 > temperatures near melting~\cite{Sazaki10}. They have found the width of
147   the QLLs perpindicular to the surface at -2.2$^{o}$C to be 3-4 \AA\
148   wide.  They have also seen the formation of two immiscible QLLs, which
149 < displayed different dynamics on the crystal surface.\cite{Sazaki12}
149 > displayed different dynamics on the crystal surface~\cite{Sazaki12}.
150  
151   There is now significant interest in the \textit{tribological}
152   properties of ice/ice and ice/water interfaces in the geophysics
153   community.  Understanding the dynamics of solid-solid shearing that is
154 < mediated by a liquid layer\cite{Cuffey99, Bell08} will aid in
154 > mediated by a liquid layer~\cite{Cuffey99, Bell08} will aid in
155   understanding the macroscopic motion of large ice
156 < masses.\cite{Casassa91, Sukhorukov13, Pritchard12, Lishman13}
156 > masses~\cite{Casassa91, Sukhorukov13, Pritchard12, Lishman13}.
157  
158   Using molecular dynamics simulations, Samadashvili has recently shown
159   that when two smooth ice slabs slide past one another, a stable
160 < liquid-like layer develops between them.\cite{Samadashvili13} In a
160 > liquid-like layer develops between them~\cite{Samadashvili13}. In a
161   previous study, our RNEMD simulations of ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ shearing
162   through liquid water have provided quantitative estimates of the
163 < solid-liquid kinetic friction coefficients.\cite{Louden13} These
163 > solid-liquid kinetic friction coefficients~\cite{Louden13}. These
164   displayed a factor of two difference between the basal and prismatic
165   facets.  The friction was found to be independent of shear direction
166   relative to the surface orientation.  We attributed facet-based
# Line 193 | Line 193 | the liquid-ice coexistence temperature for SPC/E
193   molecules within 3 \AA\ of any atoms in the ice slabs.  Each of the
194   combined ice/water systems were then equilibrated at 225K, which is
195   the liquid-ice coexistence temperature for SPC/E
196 < water~\cite{Bryk02}. Ref. \citealp{Louden13} contains a more detailed
197 < explanation of the construction of similar ice/water interfaces. The
198 < resulting dimensions as well as the number of ice and liquid water
199 < molecules contained in each of these systems are shown in Table
200 < \ref{tab:method}.
196 > water~\cite{Bryk02}. Reference \citealp{Louden13} contains a more
197 > detailed explanation of the construction of similar ice/water
198 > interfaces. The resulting dimensions as well as the number of ice and
199 > liquid water molecules contained in each of these systems are shown in
200 > Table \ref{tab:method}.
201  
202   The SPC/E water model~\cite{Berendsen87} has been extensively
203   characterized over a wide range of liquid
204 < conditions,\cite{Arbuckle02,Kuang12} and its phase diagram has been
205 < well studied.\cite{Baez95,Bryk04b,Sanz04b,Fennell:2005fk} With longer
204 > conditions~\cite{Arbuckle02,Kuang12}, and its phase diagram has been
205 > well studied~\cite{Baez95,Bryk04b,Sanz04b,Fennell:2005fk}, With longer
206   cutoff radii and careful treatment of electrostatics, SPC/E mostly
207   avoids metastable crystalline morphologies like
208   ice-\textit{i}~\cite{Fennell:2005fk} and ice-B~\cite{Baez95}.  The
209 < free energies and melting points
210 < \cite{Baez95,Arbuckle02,Gay02,Bryk02,Bryk04b,Sanz04b,Fennell:2005fk,Fernandez06,Abascal07,Vrbka07}
209 > free energies and melting
210 > points~\cite{Baez95,Arbuckle02,Gay02,Bryk02,Bryk04b,Sanz04b,Fennell:2005fk,Fernandez06,Abascal07,Vrbka07}
211   of various other crystalline polymorphs have also been calculated.
212   Haymet \textit{et al.} have studied quiescent Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$/water
213   interfaces using the SPC/E water model, and have seen structural and
# Line 225 | Line 225 | surfaces is given in Table \ref{tab:method}.  Weak tra
225   surface) until a large surface ($>$ 126 nm\textsuperscript{2}) had
226   been created.  The sizes and numbers of molecules in each of the
227   surfaces is given in Table \ref{tab:method}.  Weak translational
228 < restraining potentials with spring constants of 1.5-4.0~$\mathrm{kcal\
229 <  mol}^{-1}\mathrm{~\AA}^{-2}$ were applied to the centers of mass of
230 < each molecule in order to prevent surface melting, although the
231 < molecules were allowed to reorient freely. A water doplet containing
232 < 2048 SPC/E molecules was created separately. Droplets of this size can
233 < produce agreement with the Young contact angle extrapolated to an
234 < infinite drop size~\cite{Daub10}. The surfaces and droplet were
235 < independently equilibrated to 225 K, at which time the droplet was
236 < placed 3-5~\AA\ above the surface.  Five statistically independent
237 < simulations were carried out for each facet, and the droplet was
238 < placed at unique $x$ and $y$ locations for each of these simulations.
239 < Each simulation was 5~ns in length and was conducted in the
240 < microcanonical (NVE) ensemble.  Representative configurations for the
241 < droplet on the prismatic facet are shown in figure \ref{fig:Droplet}.
228 > restraining potentials with spring constants of 1.5~$\mathrm{kcal\
229 >  mol}^{-1}\mathrm{~\AA}^{-2}$ (prismatic and pyramidal facets) or
230 > 4.0~$\mathrm{kcal\ mol}^{-1}\mathrm{~\AA}^{-2}$ (basal facet) were
231 > applied to the centers of mass of each molecule in order to prevent
232 > surface melting, although the molecules were allowed to reorient
233 > freely. A water doplet containing 2048 SPC/E molecules was created
234 > separately. Droplets of this size can produce agreement with the Young
235 > contact angle extrapolated to an infinite drop size~\cite{Daub10}. The
236 > surfaces and droplet were independently equilibrated to 225 K, at
237 > which time the droplet was placed 3-5~\AA\ above the surface.  Five
238 > statistically independent simulations were carried out for each facet,
239 > and the droplet was placed at unique $x$ and $y$ locations for each of
240 > these simulations.  Each simulation was 5~ns in length and was
241 > conducted in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble.  Representative
242 > configurations for the droplet on the prismatic facet are shown in
243 > figure \ref{fig:Droplet}.
244  
243
245   \subsection{Shearing Simulations (Interfaces in Bulk Water)}
246  
247   To perform the shearing simulations, the velocity shearing and scaling
# Line 260 | Line 261 | order to prevent the frictional heating due to the she
261   The kinetic energy flux (producing a thermal gradient) is necessary
262   when performing shearing simulations at the ice-water interface in
263   order to prevent the frictional heating due to the shear from melting
264 < the interface. Reference \citealp{Louden13} provides more details on
265 < the VSS-RNEMD method as applied to ice-water interfaces.  A
266 < representative configuration of the solvated prismatic facet being
267 < sheared through liquid water is shown in figure \ref{fig:Shearing}.
264 > the crystal. Reference \citealp{Louden13} provides more details on the
265 > VSS-RNEMD method as applied to ice-water interfaces.  A representative
266 > configuration of the solvated prismatic facet being sheared through
267 > liquid water is shown in figure \ref{fig:Shearing}.
268  
269 < In the results discussed below, the exchanges between the two regions
270 < were carried out every 2 fs (e.g. every time step). This was done to
271 < minimize the magnitude of each individual momentum exchange.  Because
272 < individual VSS-RNEMD exchanges conserve both total energy and linear
273 < momentum, the method can be ``bolted-on'' to simulations in any
274 < ensemble.  The simulations of the pyramidal interface were performed
275 < under the canonical (NVT) ensemble.  When time correlation functions
276 < were computed (see section \ref{sec:orient}), these simulations were
277 < done in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble.  All simulations of the
278 < other interfaces were done in the microcanonical ensemble.  
269 > The exchanges between the two regions were carried out every 2 fs
270 > (e.g. every time step). This was done to minimize the magnitude of
271 > each individual momentum exchange.  Because individual VSS-RNEMD
272 > exchanges conserve both total energy and linear momentum, the method
273 > can be ``bolted-on'' to simulations in any ensemble.  The simulations
274 > of the pyramidal interface were performed under the canonical (NVT)
275 > ensemble.  When time correlation functions were computed, the RNEMD
276 > simulations were done in the microcanonical (NVE) ensemble.  All
277 > simulations of the other interfaces were carried out in the
278 > microcanonical ensemble.
279  
280   \section{Results}
281   \subsection{Ice - Water Contact Angles}
# Line 307 | Line 308 | height of the solid surface ($z_\mathrm{suface}$) alon
308   large density fluctuations close to the ice, all shells located within
309   2 \AA\ of the ice surface were left out of the circular fits.  The
310   height of the solid surface ($z_\mathrm{suface}$) along with the best
311 < fitting central height ($z_\mathrm{center}$) and radius
311 > fitting origin ($z_\mathrm{droplet}$) and radius
312   ($r_\mathrm{droplet}$) of the droplet can then be used to compute the
313   contact angle,
314   \begin{equation}
315 < \theta =  90 + \frac{180}{\pi} \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{z_\mathrm{center} -
315 > \theta =  90 + \frac{180}{\pi} \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{z_\mathrm{droplet} -
316    z_\mathrm{surface}}{r_\mathrm{droplet}} \right).
317   \end{equation}
318   Both methods provided similar estimates of the dynamic contact angle,
# Line 337 | Line 338 | prismatic and secondary prismatic had values for $\the
338   prismatic and secondary prismatic had values for $\theta_\infty$ near
339   43$^{o}$ as seen in Table \ref{tab:kappa}.
340  
341 < These results indicate that the basal and pyramidal facets are
342 < somewhat more hydrophilic than the prismatic and secondary prism
343 < facets, and surprisingly, that the differential hydrophilicities of
344 < the crystal facets is not reflected in the spreading rate of the
344 < droplet.
341 > These results indicate that the basal and pyramidal facets are more
342 > hydrophilic than the prismatic and secondary prism facets, and
343 > surprisingly, that the differential hydrophilicities of the crystal
344 > facets is not reflected in the spreading rate of the droplet.
345  
346   % This is in good agreement with our calculations of friction
347   % coefficients, in which the basal
# Line 351 | Line 351 | droplet.
351   % hydrophilicities of the facets.
352  
353   \subsection{Coefficient of friction of the interfaces}
354 < While investigating the kinetic coefficient of friction, there was found
355 < to be a dependence for $\mu_k$
356 < on the temperature of the liquid water in the system. We believe this
357 < dependence
358 < arrises from the sharp discontinuity of the viscosity for the SPC/E model
359 < at temperatures approaching 200 K\cite{Kuang12}. Due to this, we propose
360 < a weighting to the interfacial friction coefficient, $\kappa$ by the
361 < shear viscosity of the fluid at 225 K. The interfacial friction coefficient
362 < relates the shear stress with the relative velocity of the fluid normal to the
363 < interface:
364 < \begin{equation}\label{Shenyu-13}
365 < j_{z}(p_{x}) = \kappa[v_{x}(fluid)-v_{x}(solid)]
366 < \end{equation}
367 < where $j_{z}(p_{x})$ is the applied momentum flux (shear stress) across $z$
368 < in the
369 < $x$-dimension, and $v_{x}$(fluid) and $v_{x}$(solid) are the velocities
370 < directly adjacent to the interface. The shear viscosity, $\eta(T)$, of the
371 < fluid can be determined under a linear response of the momentum
372 < gradient to the applied shear stress by
354 > In a bulk fluid, the shear viscosity, $\eta$, can be determined
355 > assuming a linear response to a shear stress,
356   \begin{equation}\label{Shenyu-11}
357 < j_{z}(p_{x}) = \eta(T) \frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}.
357 > j_{z}(p_{x}) = \eta \frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}.
358   \end{equation}
359 < Using eqs \eqref{Shenyu-13} and \eqref{Shenyu-11}, we can find the following
360 < expression for $\kappa$,
361 < \begin{equation}\label{kappa-1}
362 < \kappa = \eta(T) \frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}\frac{1}{[v_{x}(fluid)-v_{x}(solid)]}.
359 > Here $j_{z}(p_{x})$ is the flux (in $x$-momentum) that is transferred
360 > in the $z$ direction (i.e. the shear stress). The RNEMD simulations
361 > impose an artificial momentum flux between two regions of the
362 > simulation, and the velocity gradient is the fluid's response. This
363 > technique has now been applied quite widely to determine the
364 > viscosities of a number of bulk fluids~\cite{}.
365 >
366 > At the interface between two phases (e.g. liquid / solid) the same
367 > momentum flux creates a velocity difference between the two materials,
368 > and this can be used to define an interfacial friction coefficient
369 > ($\kappa$),
370 > \begin{equation}\label{Shenyu-13}
371 > j_{z}(p_{x}) = \kappa \left[ v_{x}(liquid) - v_{x}(solid) \right]
372   \end{equation}
373 < Here is where we will introduce the weighting term of $\eta(225)/\eta(T)$
374 < giving us
373 > where $v_{x}(liquid)$ and $v_{x}(solid)$ are the velocities measured
374 > directly adjacent to the interface.
375 >
376 > The simulations described here contain significant quantities of both
377 > liquid and solid phases, and the momentum flux must traverse a region
378 > of the liquid that is simultaneously under a thermal gradient.  Since
379 > the liquid has a temperature-dependent shear viscosity, $\eta(T)$,
380 > estimates of the solid-liquid friction coefficient can be obtained if
381 > one knows the viscosity of the liquid at the interface (i.e. at the
382 > melting temperature, $T_m$),
383   \begin{equation}\label{kappa-2}
384 < \kappa = \frac{\eta(225)}{[v_{x}(fluid)-v_{x}(solid)]}\frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}.
384 > \kappa = \frac{\eta(T_{m})}{\left[v_{x}(fluid)-v_{x}(solid)\right]}\left(\frac{\partial v_{x}}{\partial z}\right).
385   \end{equation}
386 <
387 < To obtain the value of $\eta(225)$ for the SPC/E model, a $31.09 \times 29.38
388 < \times 124.39$ \AA\ box with 3744 SPC/E liquid water molecules was
389 < equilibrated to 225K,
390 < and 5 unique shearing experiments were performed. Each experiment was
391 < conducted in the NVE and were 5 ns in
392 < length. The VSS were attempted every timestep, which was set to 2 fs.
393 < For our SPC/E systems, we found $\eta(225)$  to be 0.0148 $\pm$ 0.0007 Pa s,
394 < roughly ten times larger than the value found for 280 K SPC/E bulk water by
395 < Kuang\cite{Kuang12}.
386 > For SPC/E, the melting temperature of Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ is estimated
387 > to be 225~K~\cite{Bryk02}.  To obtain the value of
388 > $\eta(225\mathrm{~K})$ for the SPC/E model, a $31.09 \times 29.38
389 > \times 124.39$ \AA\ box with 3744 water molecules in a disordered
390 > configuration was equilibrated to 225~K, and five
391 > statistically-independent shearing simulations were performed (with
392 > imposed fluxes that spanned a range of XXXX-YYYY).  Each simulation
393 > was conducted in the microcanonical ensemble with total simulation
394 > times of 5 ns. The VSS-RNEMD exchanges were carried out every 2 fs. We
395 > estimate $\eta(225\mathrm{~K})$ to be 0.0148 $\pm$ 0.0007 Pa s for
396 > SPC/E, roughly ten times larger than the shear viscosity previously
397 > computed at 280~K~\cite{Kuang12}.
398  
399 < The interfacial friction coefficient, $\kappa$, can equivalently be expressed
400 < as the ratio of the viscosity of the fluid to the slip length, $\delta$, which
401 < is an indication of how 'slippery' the interface is.
399 > The interfacial friction coefficient, $\kappa$, can equivalently be
400 > expressed as the ratio of the viscosity of the fluid to the
401 > hydrodynamic slip length, $\delta$, which is an indication of strength
402 > of the interactions between the solid and liquid phases,
403   \begin{equation}\label{kappa-3}
404   \kappa = \frac{\eta}{\delta}
405   \end{equation}
406 < In each of the systems, the interfacial temperature was kept fixed to 225K,
407 < which ensured the viscosity of the fluid at the
408 < interace was approximately the same. Thus, any significant variation in
409 < $\kappa$ between
410 < the systems indicates differences in the 'slipperiness' of the interfaces.
411 < As each of the ice systems are sheared relative to liquid water, the
412 < 'slipperiness' of the interface can be taken as an indication of how
413 < hydrophobic or hydrophilic the interface is. The calculated $\kappa$ values
414 < found for the four crystal facets of Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ investigated are shown
415 < in Table \ref{tab:kappa}. The basal and pyramidal facets were found to have
416 < similar values of $\kappa \approx$ 0.0006
417 < (amu \AA\textsuperscript{-2} fs\textsuperscript{-1}), while values of
418 < $\kappa \approx$ 0.0003 (amu \AA\textsuperscript{-2} fs\textsuperscript{-1})
416 < were found for the prismatic and secondary prismatic systems.
417 < These results indicate that the basal and pyramidal facets are
418 < more hydrophilic than the prismatic and secondary prismatic facets.
406 > The connection between slip length and surface hydrophobicity is not
407 > yet clear. In some simulations, the slip length has been found to have
408 > a link to the effective surface hydrophobicity~\cite{Sendner:2009uq},
409 > although Ho \textit{et al.} have found that liquid water can also slip
410 > on hydrophilic surfaces~\cite{Ho:2011zr}. Experimental evidence for a
411 > direct tie between slip length and hydrophobicity is also not
412 > definitive. Total-internal reflection particle image velocimetry
413 > (TIR-PIV) studies have suggested that there is a link between slip
414 > length and effective
415 > hydrophobicity~\cite{Lasne:2008vn,Bouzigues:2008ys}. However, recent
416 > surface sensitive cross-correlation spectroscopy (TIR-FCCS)
417 > measurements have seen similar slip behavior for both hydrophobic and
418 > hydrophilic surfaces~\cite{Schaeffel:2013kx}.
419  
420 < \subsection{Interfacial width}
421 < In the literature there is good agreement that between the solid ice and
422 < the bulk water, there exists a region of 'slush-like' water molecules.
423 < In this region, the water molecules are structurely distinguishable and
424 < behave differently than those of the solid ice or the bulk water.
425 < The characteristics of this region have been defined by both structural
426 < and dynamic properties; and its width has been measured by the change of these
427 < properties from their bulk liquid values to those of the solid ice.
428 < Examples of these properties include the density, the diffusion constant, and
429 < the translational order profile. \cite{Bryk02,Karim90,Gay02,Hayward01,Hayward02,Karim88}  
420 > In each of the systems studied here, the interfacial temperature was
421 > kept fixed to 225K, which ensured the viscosity of the fluid at the
422 > interace was identical. Thus, any significant variation in $\kappa$
423 > between the systems is a direct indicator of the slip length and the
424 > effective interaction strength between the solid and liquid phases.
425  
426 < Since the VSS-RNEMD moves used to impose the thermal and velocity gradients
427 < perturb the momenta of the water molecules in
428 < the systems, parameters that depend on translational motion may give
429 < faulty results. A stuructural parameter will be less effected by the
430 < VSS-RNEMD perturbations to the system. Due to this, we have used the
431 < local tetrahedral order parameter (Eq 5\cite{Louden13}) to quantify the width of the interface,
432 < which was originally described by Kumar\cite{Kumar09} and
433 < Errington\cite{Errington01}, and used by Bryk and Haymet in a previous study
434 < of ice/water interfaces.\cite{Bryk04b}
435 <
436 < To determine the width of the interfaces, each of the systems were
437 < divided into 100 artificial bins along the
438 < $z$-dimension, and the local tetrahedral order parameter, $q(z)$, was
439 < time-averaged for each of the bins, resulting in a tetrahedrality profile of
445 < the system. These profiles are shown across the $z$-dimension of the systems
446 < in panel $a$ of Figures \ref{fig:pyrComic}
447 < and \ref{fig:spComic} (black circles). The $q(z)$ function has a range of
448 < (0,1), where a larger value indicates a more tetrahedral environment.
449 < The $q(z)$ for the bulk liquid was found to be $\approx $ 0.77, while values of
450 < $\approx $ 0.92 were more common for the ice. The tetrahedrality profiles were
451 < fit using a hyperbolic tangent (Eq. 6\cite{Louden13}) designed to smoothly fit the
452 < bulk to ice
453 < transition, while accounting for the thermal influence on the profile by the
454 < kinetic energy exchanges of the VSS-RNEMD moves. In panels $b$ and $c$, the
455 < resulting thermal and velocity gradients from an imposed kinetic energy and
456 < momentum fluxes can be seen. The verticle dotted
457 < lines traversing all three panels indicate the midpoints of the interface
458 < as determined by the hyperbolic tangent fit of the tetrahedrality profiles.
459 <
460 < From fitting the tetrahedrality profiles for each of the 0.5 nanosecond
461 < simulations (panel c of Figures \ref{fig:pyrComic} and \ref{fig:spComic})
462 < by eq. 6\cite{Louden13},we find the interfacial width to be
463 < 3.2 $\pm$ 0.2 and 3.2 $\pm$ 0.2 \AA\ for the control system with no applied
464 < momentum flux for both the pyramidal and secondary prismatic systems.
465 < Over the range of shear rates investigated,
466 < 0.6 $\pm$ 0.2 $\mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow$ 5.6 $\pm$ 0.4 $\mathrm{ms}^{-1}$
467 < for the pyramidal system and 0.9 $\pm$ 0.3 $\mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow$ 5.4
468 < $\pm$ 0.1 $\mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the secondary prismatic, we found no
469 < significant change in the interfacial width. This follows our previous
470 < findings of the basal and
471 < prismatic systems, in which the interfacial width was invarient of the
472 < shear rate of the ice. The interfacial width of the quiescent basal and
473 < prismatic systems was found to be 3.2 $\pm$ 0.4 \AA\ and 3.6 $\pm$ 0.2 \AA\
474 < respectively, over the range of shear rates investigated, 0.6 $\pm$ 0.3
475 < $\mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow$ 5.3 $\pm$ 0.5 $\mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the basal
476 < system and 0.9 $\pm$ 0.2 $\mathrm{ms}^{-1} \rightarrow$ 4.5 $\pm$ 0.1
477 < $\mathrm{ms}^{-1}$ for the prismatic.
426 > The calculated $\kappa$ values found for the four crystal facets of
427 > Ice-I$_\mathrm{h}$ are shown in Table \ref{tab:kappa}. The basal and
428 > pyramidal facets were found to have similar values of $\kappa \approx
429 > 6$ ($\times 10^{-4} \mathrm{amu~\AA}^{-2}\mathrm{fs}^{-1}$), while the
430 > prismatic and secondary prism facets exhibited $\kappa \approx 3$
431 > ($\times 10^{-4} \mathrm{amu~\AA}^{-2}\mathrm{fs}^{-1}$). These
432 > results are also essentially independent of shearing direction
433 > relative to features on the surface of the facets.  The friction
434 > coefficients indicate that the basal and pyramidal facets have
435 > significantly stronger interactions with liquid water than either of
436 > the two prismatic facets.  This is in agreement with the contact angle
437 > results above - both of the high-friction facets exhbited smaller
438 > contact angles, suggesting that the solid-liquid friction is
439 > correlated with the hydrophilicity of these facets.
440  
441 < These results indicate that the surface structure of the exposed ice crystal
442 < has little to no effect on how far into the bulk the ice-like structural
443 < ordering is. Also, it appears that the interface is not structurally effected
444 < by the movement of water over the ice.
441 > \subsection{Structural measures of interfacial width under shear}
442 > One of the open questions about ice/water interfaces is whether the
443 > thickness of the 'slush-like' quasi-liquid layer (QLL) depends on the
444 > facet of ice presented to the water.  In the QLL region, the water
445 > molecules are ordered differently than in either the solid or liquid
446 > phases, and also exhibit distinct dynamical behavior.  The width of
447 > this quasi-liquid layer has been estimated by finding the distance
448 > over which structural order parameters or dynamic properties change
449 > from their bulk liquid values to those of the solid ice.  The
450 > properties used to find interfacial widths have included the local
451 > density, the diffusion constant, and the translational and
452 > orientational order
453 > parameters~\cite{Karim88,Karim90,Hayward01,Hayward02,Bryk02,Gay02,Louden13}.
454  
455 + The VSS-RNEMD simulations impose thermal and velocity gradients.
456 + These gradients perturb the momenta of the water molecules, so
457 + parameters that depend on translational motion are often measuring the
458 + momentum exchange, and not physical properties of the interface.  As a
459 + structural measure of the interface, we have used the local
460 + tetrahedral order parameter to estimate the width of the interface.
461 + This quantity was originally described by Errington and
462 + Debenedetti~\cite{Errington01} and has been used in bulk simulations
463 + by Kumar \textit{et al.}~\cite{Kumar09}.  It has previously been used
464 + in ice/water interfaces by by Bryk and Haymet~\cite{Bryk04b}.
465  
466 < \subsection{Orientational dynamics \label{sec:orient}}
467 < %Should we include the math here?
466 > To determine the structural widths of the interfaces under shear, each
467 > of the systems was divided into 100 bins along the $z$-dimension, and
468 > the local tetrahedral order parameter (Eq. 5 in Reference
469 > \citealp{Louden13}) was time-averaged in each bin for the duration of
470 > the shearing simulation.  The spatial dependence of this order
471 > parameter, $q(z)$, is the tetrahedrality profile of the interface.  A
472 > representative profile for the pyramidal facet is shown in circles in
473 > panel $a$ of figure \ref{fig:pyrComic}. The $q(z)$ function has a
474 > range of $(0,1)$, where a value of unity indicates a perfectly
475 > tetrahedral environment.  The $q(z)$ for the bulk liquid was found to
476 > be $\approx~0.77$, while values of $\approx~0.92$ were more common in
477 > the ice. The tetrahedrality profiles were fit using a hyperbolic
478 > tangent function (see Eq. 6 in Reference \citealp{Louden13}) designed
479 > to smoothly fit the bulk to ice transition while accounting for the
480 > weak thermal gradient. In panels $b$ and $c$, the resulting thermal
481 > and velocity gradients from an imposed kinetic energy and momentum
482 > fluxes can be seen. The vertical dotted lines traversing all three
483 > panels indicate the midpoints of the interface as determined by the
484 > tetrahedrality profiles.
485 >
486 > We find the interfacial width to be $3.2 \pm 0.2$ \AA\ (pyramidal) and
487 > $3.2 \pm 0.2$ \AA\ (secondary prism) for the control systems with no
488 > applied momentum flux. This is similar to our previous results for the
489 > interfacial widths of the quiescent basal ($3.2 \pm 0.4$ \AA) and
490 > prismatic systems ($3.6 \pm 0.2$ \AA).
491 >
492 > Over the range of shear rates investigated, $0.4 \rightarrow
493 > 6.0~\mathrm{~m~s}^{-1}$ for the pyramidal system and $0.6 \rightarrow
494 > 5.2~\mathrm{~m~s}^{-1}$ for the secondary prism, we found no
495 > significant change in the interfacial width. The mean interfacial
496 > widths are collected in table \ref{tab:kappa}. This follows our
497 > previous findings of the basal and prismatic systems, in which the
498 > interfacial widths of the basal and prismatic facets were also found
499 > to be insensitive to the shear rate~\cite{Louden13}.
500 >
501 > The similarity of these interfacial width estimates indicate that the
502 > particular facet of the exposed ice crystal has little to no effect on
503 > how far into the bulk the ice-like structural ordering persists. Also,
504 > it appears that for the shearing rates imposed in this study, the
505 > interfacial width is not structurally modified by the movement of
506 > water over the ice.
507 >
508 > \subsection{Dynamic measures of interfacial width under shear}
509   The orientational time correlation function,
510   \begin{equation}\label{C(t)1}
511    C_{2}(t)=\langle P_{2}(\mathbf{u}(0)\cdot \mathbf{u}(t))\rangle,
# Line 555 | Line 577 | those found for the basal ($d_{basal}\approx2.9$ \AA\
577   ($d_{prismatic}\approx3.5$ \AA\ ) systems.
578  
579  
558
559
560
580   \section{Conclusion}
581   We present the results of molecular dynamics simulations of the basal,
582   prismatic, pyrmaidal

Diff Legend

Removed lines
+ Added lines
< Changed lines
> Changed lines