ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | View Changeset | Root Listing
root/group/trunk/iceiPaper/iceiPaper.tex
Revision: 1457
Committed: Tue Sep 14 23:03:53 2004 UTC (19 years, 9 months ago) by chrisfen
Content type: application/x-tex
File size: 14642 byte(s)
Log Message:
More results and discussion

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 chrisfen 1453 %\documentclass[prb,aps,twocolumn,tabularx]{revtex4}
2     \documentclass[preprint,aps,endfloats]{revtex4}
3     %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
4     %\usepackage{endfloat}
5     \usepackage{amsmath}
6     \usepackage{epsf}
7     \usepackage{berkeley}
8     %\usepackage{setspace}
9     %\usepackage{tabularx}
10     \usepackage{graphicx}
11     %\usepackage[ref]{overcite}
12     %\pagestyle{plain}
13     %\pagenumbering{arabic}
14     %\oddsidemargin 0.0cm \evensidemargin 0.0cm
15     %\topmargin -21pt \headsep 10pt
16     %\textheight 9.0in \textwidth 6.5in
17     %\brokenpenalty=10000
18    
19     %\renewcommand\citemid{\ } % no comma in optional reference note
20    
21     \begin{document}
22    
23     \title{A Free Energy Study of Low Temperature and Anomolous Ice}
24    
25     \author{Christopher J. Fennell and J. Daniel Gezelter{\thefootnote}
26     \footnote[1]{Corresponding author. \ Electronic mail: gezelter@nd.edu}}
27    
28     \address{Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry\\ University of Notre Dame\\
29     Notre Dame, Indiana 46556}
30    
31     \date{\today}
32    
33     %\maketitle
34     %\doublespacing
35    
36     \begin{abstract}
37     \end{abstract}
38    
39     \maketitle
40    
41     \newpage
42    
43     %\narrowtext
44    
45     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
46     % BODY OF TEXT
47     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
48    
49     \section{Introduction}
50    
51     \section{Methods}
52    
53 chrisfen 1454 Canonical ensemble (NVT) molecular dynamics calculations were
54     performed using the OOPSE (Object-Oriented Parallel Simulation Engine)
55     molecular mechanics package. All molecules were treated as rigid
56     bodies, with orientational motion propogated using the symplectic DLM
57     integration method. Details about the implementation of these
58     techniques can be found in a recent publication.\cite{Meineke05}
59    
60     Thermodynamic integration was utilized to calculate the free energy of
61 chrisfen 1456 several ice crystals at 200 K using the TIP3P, TIP4P, TIP5P, SPC/E,
62     SSD/RF, and SSD/E water models. Liquid state free energies at 300 and
63     400 K for all of these water models were also determined using this
64     same technique, in order to determine melting points and generate
65     phase diagrams. All simulations were carried out at densities
66     resulting in a pressure of approximately 1 atm at their respective
67     temperatures.
68 chrisfen 1454
69     For the thermodynamic integration of molecular crystals, the Einstein
70     Crystal is chosen as the reference state that the system is converted
71     to over the course of the simulation. In an Einstein Crystal, the
72     molecules are harmonically restrained at their ideal lattice locations
73     and orientations. The partition function for a molecular crystal
74     restrained in this fashion has been evaluated, and the Helmholtz Free
75     Energy ({\it A}) is given by
76     \begin{eqnarray}
77     A = E_m\ -\ kT\ln \left (\frac{kT}{h\nu}\right )^3&-&kT\ln \left
78     [\pi^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{A}kT}{h^2}\right
79     )^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{B}kT}{h^2}\right
80     )^\frac{1}{2}\left (\frac{8\pi^2I_\mathrm{C}kT}{h^2}\right
81     )^\frac{1}{2}\right ] \nonumber \\ &-& kT\ln \left [\frac{kT}{2(\pi
82     K_\omega K_\theta)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\exp\left
83     (-\frac{kT}{2K_\theta}\right)\int_0^{\left (\frac{kT}{2K_\theta}\right
84     )^\frac{1}{2}}\exp(t^2)\mathrm{d}t\right ],
85     \label{ecFreeEnergy}
86     \end{eqnarray}
87     where $2\pi\nu = (K_\mathrm{v}/m)^{1/2}$.\cite{Baez95a} In equation
88     \ref{ecFreeEnergy}, $K_\mathrm{v}$, $K_\mathrm{\theta}$, and
89     $K_\mathrm{\omega}$ are the spring constants restraining translational
90     motion and deflection of and rotation around the principle axis of the
91     molecule respectively (Fig. \ref{waterSpring}), and $E_m$ is the
92     minimum potential energy of the ideal crystal. In the case of
93     molecular liquids, the ideal vapor is chosen as the target reference
94     state.
95 chrisfen 1456 \begin{figure}
96     \includegraphics[scale=1.0]{rotSpring.eps}
97     \caption{Possible orientational motions for a restrained molecule.
98     $\theta$ angles correspond to displacement from the body-frame {\it
99     z}-axis, while $\omega$ angles correspond to rotation about the
100     body-frame {\it z}-axis. $K_\theta$ and $K_\omega$ are spring
101     constants for the harmonic springs restraining motion in the $\theta$
102     and $\omega$ directions.}
103     \label{waterSpring}
104     \end{figure}
105 chrisfen 1454
106 chrisfen 1456 Charge, dipole, and Lennard-Jones interactions were modified by a
107     cubic switching between 100\% and 85\% of the cutoff value (9 \AA ). By
108     applying this function, these interactions are smoothly truncated,
109     thereby avoiding poor energy conserving dynamics resulting from
110     harsher truncation schemes. The effect of a long-range correction was
111     also investigated on select model systems in a variety of manners. For
112     the SSD/RF model, a reaction field with a fixed dielectric constant of
113     80 was applied in all simulations.\cite{Onsager36} For a series of the
114     least computationally expensive models (SSD/E, SSD/RF, and TIP3P),
115     simulations were performed with longer cutoffs of 12 and 15 \AA\ to
116     compare with the 9 \AA\ cutoff results. Finally, results from the use
117     of an Ewald summation were estimated for TIP3P and SPC/E by performing
118     calculations with Particle-Mesh Ewald (PME) in the TINKER molecular
119     mechanics software package. TINKER was chosen because it can also
120     propogate the motion of rigid-bodies, and provides the most direct
121     comparison to the results from OOPSE. The calculated energy difference
122     in the presence and absence of PME was applied to the previous results
123     in order to predict changes in the free energy landscape.
124 chrisfen 1454
125 chrisfen 1456 \section{Results and discussion}
126 chrisfen 1454
127 chrisfen 1456 The free energy of proton ordered Ice-{\it i} was calculated and
128     compared with the free energies of proton ordered variants of the
129     experimentally observed low-density ice polymorphs, $I_h$ and $I_c$,
130     as well as the higher density ice B, observed by B\`{a}ez and Clancy
131     and thought to be the minimum free energy structure for the SPC/E
132     model at ambient conditions (Table \ref{freeEnergy}).\cite{Baez95b}
133     Ice XI, the experimentally observed proton ordered variant of ice
134     $I_h$, was investigated initially, but it was found not to be as
135     stable as antiferroelectric variants of proton ordered or even proton
136     disordered ice$I_h$.\cite{Davidson84} The proton ordered variant of
137     ice $I_h$ used here is a simple antiferroelectric version that has an
138     8 molecule unit cell. The crystals contained 648 or 1728 molecules for
139     ice B, 1024 or 1280 molecules for ice $I_h$, 1000 molecules for ice
140     $I_c$, or 1024 molecules for Ice-{\it i}. The larger crystal sizes
141     were necessary for simulations involving larger cutoff values.
142 chrisfen 1454
143 chrisfen 1456 \begin{table*}
144     \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
145     \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
146     \begin{center}
147     \caption{Calculated free energies for several ice polymorphs with a
148     variety of common water models. All calculations used a cutoff radius
149     of 9 \AA\ and were performed at 200 K and $\sim$1 atm. Units are
150     kcal/mol. *Ice $I_c$ is unstable at 200 K using SSD/RF.}
151     \begin{tabular}{ l c c c c }
152     \hline \\[-7mm]
153     \ \quad \ Water Model\ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \quad \ \\
154     \hline \\[-3mm]
155     \ \quad \ TIP3P & \ \quad \ -11.41 & \ \quad \ -11.23 & \ \quad \ -11.82 & \quad -12.30\\
156     \ \quad \ TIP4P & \ \quad \ -11.84 & \ \quad \ -12.04 & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.33\\
157     \ \quad \ TIP5P & \ \quad \ -11.85 & \ \quad \ -11.86 & \ \quad \ -11.96 & \quad -12.29\\
158     \ \quad \ SPC/E & \ \quad \ -12.67 & \ \quad \ -12.96 & \ \quad \ -13.25 & \quad -13.55\\
159     \ \quad \ SSD/E & \ \quad \ -11.27 & \ \quad \ -11.19 & \ \quad \ -12.09 & \quad -12.54\\
160     \ \quad \ SSD/RF & \ \quad \ -11.51 & \ \quad \ NA* & \ \quad \ -12.08 & \quad -12.29\\
161     \end{tabular}
162     \label{freeEnergy}
163     \end{center}
164     \end{minipage}
165     \end{table*}
166 chrisfen 1453
167 chrisfen 1456 The free energy values computed for the studied polymorphs indicate
168     that Ice-{\it i} is the most stable state for all of the common water
169     models studied. With the free energy at these state points, the
170     temperature and pressure dependence of the free energy was used to
171     project to other state points and build phase diagrams. Figures
172     \ref{tp3phasedia} and \ref{ssdrfphasedia} are example diagrams built
173     from the free energy results. All other models have similar structure,
174     only the crossing points between these phases exist at different
175     temperatures and pressures. It is interesting to note that ice $I$
176     does not exist in either cubic or hexagonal form in any of the phase
177     diagrams for any of the models. For purposes of this study, ice B is
178     representative of the dense ice polymorphs. A recent study by Sanz
179     {\it et al.} goes into detail on the phase diagrams for SPC/E and
180     TIP4P in the high pressure regime.\cite{Sanz04}
181     \begin{figure}
182     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{tp3PhaseDia.eps}
183     \caption{Phase diagram for the TIP3P water model in the low pressure
184     regime. The displayed $T_m$ and $T_b$ values are good predictions of
185     the experimental values; however, the solid phases shown are not the
186     experimentally observed forms. Both cubic and hexagonal ice $I$ are
187     higher in energy and don't appear in the phase diagram.}
188     \label{tp3phasedia}
189     \end{figure}
190     \begin{figure}
191     \includegraphics[width=\linewidth]{ssdrfPhaseDia.eps}
192     \caption{Phase diagram for the SSD/RF water model in the low pressure
193     regime. Calculations producing these results were done under an
194     applied reaction field. It is interesting to note that this
195     computationally efficient model (over 3 times more efficient than
196     TIP3P) exhibits phase behavior similar to the less computationally
197     conservative charge based models.}
198     \label{ssdrfphasedia}
199     \end{figure}
200    
201     \begin{table*}
202     \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
203     \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
204     \begin{center}
205     \caption{Melting ($T_m$), boiling ($T_b$), and sublimation ($T_s$)
206     temperatures of several common water models compared with experiment.}
207     \begin{tabular}{ l c c c c c c c }
208     \hline \\[-7mm]
209     \ \ Equilibria Point\ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP3P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ TIP4P \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ TIP5P \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SPC/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/E \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ SSD/RF \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Exp. \ \ \\
210     \hline \\[-3mm]
211     \ \ $T_m$ (K) & \ \ 269 & \ \ 265 & \ \ 271 & 297 & \ \ - & \ \ 278 & \ \ 273\\
212     \ \ $T_b$ (K) & \ \ 357 & \ \ 354 & \ \ 337 & 396 & \ \ - & \ \ 349 & \ \ 373\\
213     \ \ $T_s$ (K) & \ \ - & \ \ - & \ \ - & - & \ \ 355 & \ \ - & \ \ -\\
214     \end{tabular}
215     \label{meltandboil}
216     \end{center}
217     \end{minipage}
218     \end{table*}
219    
220     Table \ref{meltandboil} lists the melting and boiling temperatures
221     calculated from this work. Surprisingly, most of these models have
222     melting points that compare quite favorably with experiment. The
223     unfortunate aspect of this result is that this phase change occurs
224     between Ice-{\it i} and the liquid state rather than ice $I_h$ and the
225     liquid state. These results are actually not contrary to previous
226     studies in the literature. Earlier free energy studies of ice $I$
227     using TIP4P predict a $T_m$ ranging from 214 to 238 K (differences
228     being attributed to choice of interaction truncation and different
229     ordered and disordered molecular arrangements). If the presence of ice
230     B and Ice-{\it i} were omitted, a $T_m$ value around 210 K would be
231     predicted from this work. However, the $T_m$ from Ice-{\it i} is
232     calculated at 265 K, significantly higher in temperature than the
233     previous studies. Also of interest in these results is that SSD/E does
234     not exhibit a melting point at 1 atm, but it shows a sublimation point
235     at 355 K. This is due to the significant stability of Ice-{\it i} over
236     all other polymorphs for this particular model under these
237     conditions. While troubling, this behavior turned out to be
238     advantagious in that it facilitated the spontaneous crystallization of
239     Ice-{\it i}. These observations provide a warning that simulations of
240     SSD/E as a ``liquid'' near 300 K are actually metastable and run the
241     risk of spontaneous crystallization. However, this risk changes when
242     applying a longer cutoff.
243    
244 chrisfen 1457 Increasing the cutoff radius in simulations of the more
245     computationally efficient water models was done in order to evaluate
246     the trend in free energy values when moving to systems that do not
247     involve potential truncation. As seen in Fig. \ref{incCutoff}, the
248     free energy of all the ice polymorphs show a substantial dependence on
249     cutoff radius. In general, there is a narrowing of the free energy
250     differences while moving to greater cutoff radius. This trend is much
251     more subtle in the case of SSD/RF, indicating that the free energies
252     calculated with a reaction field present provide a more accurate
253     picture of the free energy landscape in the absence of potential
254     truncation.
255 chrisfen 1456
256 chrisfen 1457 To further study the changes resulting to the inclusion of a
257     long-range interaction correction, the effect of an Ewald summation
258     was estimated by applying the potential energy difference do to its
259     inclusion in systems in the presence and absence of the
260     correction. This was accomplished by calculation of the potential
261     energy of identical crystals with and without PME using TINKER. The
262     free energies for the investigated polymorphs using the TIP3P and
263     SPC/E water models are shown in Table \ref{pmeShift}. TIP4P and TIP5P
264     are not fully supported in TINKER, so the results for these models
265     could not be estimated. The same trend pointed out through increase of
266     cutoff radius is observed in these results. Ice-{\it i} is the
267     preferred polymorph at ambient conditions for both the TIP3P and SPC/E
268     water models; however, there is a narrowing of the free energy
269     differences between the various solid forms. In the case of SPC/E this
270     narrowing is significant enough that it becomes less clear cut that
271     Ice-{\it i} is the most stable polymorph, and is possibly metastable
272     with respect to ice B and possibly ice $I_c$. However, these results
273     do not significantly alter the finding that the Ice-{\it i} polymorph
274     is a stable crystal structure that should be considered when studying
275     the phase behavior of water models.
276 chrisfen 1456
277 chrisfen 1457 \begin{table*}
278     \begin{minipage}{\linewidth}
279     \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\thempfootnote}
280     \begin{center}
281     \caption{The free energy of the studied ice polymorphs after applying the energy difference attributed to the inclusion of the PME long-range interaction correction. Units are kcal/mol.}
282     \begin{tabular}{ l c c c c }
283     \hline \\[-7mm]
284     \ \ Water Model \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_h$ \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ $I_c$ \ \ & \ \quad \ \ \ \ B \ \ & \ \ \ \ \ Ice-{\it i} \ \ \\
285     \hline \\[-3mm]
286     \ \ TIP3P & \ \ -11.53 & \ \ -11.24 & \ \ -11.51 & \ \ -11.67\\
287     \ \ SPC/E & \ \ -12.77 & \ \ -12.92 & \ \ -12.96 & \ \ -13.02\\
288     \end{tabular}
289     \label{pmeShift}
290     \end{center}
291     \end{minipage}
292     \end{table*}
293    
294 chrisfen 1453 \section{Conclusions}
295    
296     \section{Acknowledgments}
297     Support for this project was provided by the National Science
298     Foundation under grant CHE-0134881. Computation time was provided by
299     the Notre Dame Bunch-of-Boxes (B.o.B) computer cluster under NSF grant
300     DMR-0079647.
301    
302     \newpage
303    
304     \bibliographystyle{jcp}
305     \bibliography{iceiPaper}
306    
307    
308     \end{document}